Incidence Of Prosthetic Joint Infection Research Articles

CIRCULAR FRAME IN THE PRESENCE OF PRE-EXISTING ARTHROPLASTY: IS THERE AN UNACCEPTABLE RISK OF INFECTION?

IntroductionCircular external frames (CEF) are commonly used for a wide variety of indications, often when other devices are not appropriate. Circular frames are particularly associated with pin-site infection (PSI). Currently there is a gap in the available literature surrounding the risk of frame use with in-situ prosthetic joints. This retrospective study investigated the incidence of prosthetic joint infection (PJI) in a series of patients with in-situ arthroplasties treated with CEF.Materials & MethodsFrom a departmental database of 1052 frames performed from March 2007-March 2023, the outcomes of 34 patients (40 frames) with in-situ arthroplasties at the time of CEF were reviewed (mean follow-up 70 months). Patient identification was by review of all local and regional imaging. The primary outcome was development of PJI during or following CEF and subsequent need for surgical intervention. Secondary outcomes were development of superficial pin site or deep bone infection (without PJI).ResultsOf 40 frames used to treat 34 patients, no PJIs were detected. Average patient age was 67 (range 55–82). 22 had cardio-respiratory disease, 11 diabetes, 15 smoked and 8 were immunosuppressed. 53 arthroplasties were in situ at the time of treatment, 12 involving the same bone as the frame. Average time in frame was 253 days. 23 patients developed PSI, 2 required a further procedure for persistent deep bone infection not involving the arthroplasties.ConclusionsAlthough this study involves a relatively low numbers of patients, our results are reassuring that circular frame management in patients with in-situ arthroplasty does not represent an unacceptable risk of PJI. We hope to promote these findings and encourage multi-centre collaboration to expand on the available evidence to better answer this important yet under-reported clinical question.

Effect of transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation on postoperative urinary function in elderly patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty.

To observe the effect of transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation (TEAS) on postoperative urinary function in elderly patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA). One hundred and eighty elderly patients undergoing unilateral THA without indwelling urinary catheters were randomly assigned to a TEAS group (90 cases, 3 cases dropped out, 4 cases were eliminated) and a sham TEAS group (90 cases, 1 case dropped out, 4 cases were eliminated). Both groups received fascia iliac block and subarachnoid block anesthesia under ultrasound guidance. The patients in the TEAS group were treated with TEAS at Zhongji (CV 3), Guanyuan (CV 4), and bilateral Huiyang (BL 35), Ciliao (BL 32) 30 minutes before anesthesia initiation, with dissperse-dense wave, frequency of 2 Hz/100 Hz, until 30 minutes after surgery. The patients in the sham TEAS group underwent the same procedure with the device applied at the same acupoints but without electrical stimulation. The incidence of postoperative urinary retention (POUR), time to first void, voiding threshold, urinary adenosine triphosphate (ATP) level, postoperative abnormal voiding status (bladder residual volume, re-catheterization rate, nocturia occurrence), and postoperative incidence of urinary tract infection (UTI) and prosthetic joint infection (PJI) were observed in both groups. The incidence of POUR in the TEAS group was lower than that in the sham TEAS group (P<0.05); the time to first void in the TEAS group was shorter than that in the sham TEAS group (P<0.05); the voiding threshold in the TEAS group was lower than that in the sham TEAS group (P<0.05); the urinary ATP level in the TEAS group was higher than that in the sham TEAS group (P<0.05); the bladder residual volume in the TEAS group was lower than that in the sham TEAS group (P<0.05); the nocturia occurrence in the TEAS group was lower than that in the sham TEAS group (P<0.05). However, there was no statistically significant difference in re-catheterization rate, incidence of UTI, and incidence of PJI between the two groups (P>0.05). TEAS could effectively reduce the occurrence of postoperative urinary retention and improve the postoperative urinary function in elderly patients undergoing THA, which might be related with increasing the urinary ATP level.

Effect of a national infection control programme in Sweden on prosthetic joint infection incidence following primary total hip arthroplasty: a cohort study

ObjectivesProsthetic joint infection (PJI) is a serious complication following total hip arthroplasty (THA) entailing increased mortality, decreased quality of life and high healthcare costs.The primary aim was to investigate whether...

Antibiotic prophylaxis before tissue biopsy has no effect on culture results in presumed aseptic revision total hip arthroplasty.

Background: Antibiotic prophylaxis (AP) is considered to be the gold standard for revision total hip arthroplasty (R-THA) due to the high incidence of prosthetic joint infection (PJI). To diagnose PJI, intraoperative tissue biopsies for culture are of particular importance. However, antibiotic interference could theoretically lead to less reliable culture results. Currently, there is no consensus on whether AP should be administered before or after tissue biopsy. In this study, we aimed to investigate the effect of AP timing on culture results and PJI rates in presumed aseptic R-THA. Methods: A retrospective single-center cohort study among 490 patients was performed; 61 patients received AP pre-incision, and 429 patients received AP post-biopsy. At least three intraoperative tissues were sampled for each patient and cultured for a minimum of 2 weeks. Minimum follow-up was 6 months. Epidemiological and clinical data (including culture results and incidence of PJI during follow-up) were gathered and analyzed. Results: Positive (4.9 % vs. 5.4 %, ) and contaminated culture results (23.0 % vs. 22.6 %, ) were not significantly different between pre-incisional and post-biopsy AP administration. Post-operative PJI incidence during follow-up was 1.6 % and 3.0 %, respectively. This difference was not statistically significant (). Conclusion: Pre-incisional AP administration does not yield fewer culture results compared to post-biopsy AP administration. Although statistically not significant, PJI during follow-up was almost twice as high when AP was withheld until after tissue biopsy. Other literature also supports the additional protective benefit of pre-incisional AP. Therefore, we believe pre-incisional AP administration is preferable for presumed aseptic R-THA.

Does Preoperative Statin Exposure Reduce Prosthetic Joint Infections and Revisions Following Total Joint Arthroplasty?

The pleiotropic effects of statins extend beyond managing cardiovascular health and are suggested to modulate Staphylococcus aureus biofilm formation with prosthetic joint infection (PJI) reduction. However, a large analysis of statin use prior to total joint arthroplasty (TJA) to determine infection and revision risk is lacking. We specifically evaluated: 90-day to two-year (1) prosthetic joint infection (PJIs); (2) revisions; and (3) respective risk factors. We queried a national, all-payer database for patients undergoing either TKA or THA between 2010-2020. Chronic statin exposure was defined as >3 prescriptions filled within one-year prior to TJA (statin users). A control cohort of patients undergoing TJA without history of statin use prior was identified (statin naïve). Cohorts were matched 1:1 based on demographics and comorbidities (TKA: n=579,136; THA: n=202,092). Multivariate logistic regression was performed to evaluate risk factors for PJIs and revisions. Among TKA recipients, statin users had lower incidence of PJIs at one year (0.36 vs. 0.39%) to two years (0.45 vs. 0.49%) compared to the statin naïve (all, p≤0.007). Similarly, statin users had lower incidence of one- to two-year revisions (all, p≤0.048). Among THA recipients, statin users had lower incidence of PJIs at 90 days (0.37 vs. 0.45%) to two years (2% vs. 2.14%) (all, p<0.001). Similar trends were observed for 90-day to two-year revisions (all, p≤0.022). Statin use was independently associated with decreased odds of PJIs and revisions by one year. Statin use is associated with a reduced risk of PJIs and revisions from one to two years following TJA. It may be worthwhile to ensure patients take statin therapy if indicated for previously established cardiovascular guidelines.

Curtailing infection risks in hepatitis C patients: the effect of antiviral treatment in revision shoulder arthroplasty

BackgroundRevision shoulder arthroplasty (RevSA) is a complex procedure that can result in various postoperative complications. However, the impact of hepatitis C virus (HCV) on postoperative complications after RevSA remains unclear due to limited and inconsistent evidence. This study aims (1) to investigate the incidence of postoperative complications in patients with HCV undergoing RevSA, and (2) to evaluate the impact of HCV treatment on complication rates at different time points after the revision procedure, specifically at 90 days, 1 year, and 2 years MethodsWe queried a national, all-payer database to investigate recent trends in the utilization of RevSA among HCV patients to assess postoperative complication rates, including venous thromboembolism, wound complication, transfusion, and prosthetic joint infection. Statistical analyses involved propensity score matching to create balanced cohorts and logistic regression to determine the relative risk of postoperative complications. "Data was analyzed with the SPSS Statistics software (version 24.0 for Windows; IBM, Armonk, NY, USA). The study included patients who underwent partial or total RevSA procedures between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2020. Patients were identified based on medical claims that included procedural codes for RevSA and associated diagnosis codes for PJI or insertion/removal of an antibiotic spacer. A Bonferroni correction was utilized because many tests were performed and statistical significance was set at p=0.0125. ResultsThe HCV cohort demonstrated higher prosthetic joint infection (PJI) rates at one-year (5.5 vs 3.9%, p=0.006) and two-year follow-ups (6.7 vs 4.6%, p=0.006). However, no significant differences emerged in venous thromboembolism (VTE) and wound complications rates between the HCV and non-HCV cohorts. Comparing untreated and treated HCV patients, the former showed significantly higher PJI rates at two-year p=0.010, while the treated group had significantly lower odds ratios for PJI. When comparing treated HCV patients with the no HCV cohort, minimal differences were found in postoperative outcomes, indicating no significant difference in the risk of complications between the groups ConclusionOur study observed an association between HCV patients who received antiviral treatment prior to RevSA and a reduced incidence of PJI compared to untreated HCV patients. When comparing this group to the non-HCV controls, there was no significant difference in the incidence of PJI, suggesting a potential association between antiviral treatment and the observed risk patterns in HCV patients. Proper management of HCV-positive patients during RevSA is crucial for improving outcomes and reducing complications.

1312. Incidence and Microbiology of Prosthetic Joint Infection According to Time Following Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Cohort Study Among US Veterans

Abstract Background Despite the frequency of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and clinical impact of prosthetic joint infections (PJIs), the incidence and microbiology of these infections in the United States remains unclear. Our objective was to determine the incidence of PJI occurring ≤ 3 months (early), between &amp;gt; 3 and ≤ 12 months (delayed), and &amp;gt; 12 months (late) after primary TKA and to identify the organisms isolated from microbiologic cultures during each of these periods. Methods We conducted a retrospective study of patients in the Veterans Aging Cohort Study- National Cohort who underwent elective primary TKA in the VA between October 1, 1999 to September 30, 2019. The primary outcome was incident hospitalization with PJI. We estimated incidence rates (events/10,000 person-months) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of early, delayed, and late PJI. Poisson regression was used to estimate the incidence rate ratio (IRR) with 95% CI of early and delayed PJI compared to late PJI. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to demonstrate the cumulative incidence of PJI at 3, 12 and 24 months. We measured the frequency of Gram-positive, Gram-negative, fungal, polymicrobial, and culture-negative PJI occurring within each of the three time periods and compared frequencies of interest using Pearson’s chi-squared tests. Results Among 82,401 VHA patients who underwent primary TKA, a total of 1,605 incident PJIs (1.9%) were identified. The incidence rate of PJI was higher in the first 12 months after primary TKA surgery, with an IRR of 20.4 (95% CI, 18.2-222.8) for early and 4.2 (95% CI, 3.7-4.8) for delayed periods when compared to late. The cumulative incidence of PJI at 3 months was 0.77% (95% CI, 0.71-0.83%), at 12 months was 1.25% (95% CI 1.17-1.33%), and at 24 months was 1.56% (95% CI 1.48-1.65%) (Figure 1). Staphylococcus aureus was the most common organism isolated (33.2%) across the periods. Gram-negative bacteria were isolated in 11.1% of all infections, and 15.1% of early PJIs (Table 1). Kaplan Meier failure curves for prosthetic joint infection for the overall study period (upper panel) as well as the first 24 months (lower panel) following primary total knee arthroplasty. Abbreviations: PJI, prosthetic joint infection; CI, confidence interval.Table 1.Organisms isolated from synovial fluid or operative tissue cultures of early, delayed and late prosthetic joint infections after primary total knee arthroplasty. aAmong the 1,605 PJIs in the Overall Cohort, the microbiology data for 103 were missing and 1,502 PJIs with available microbiology data were included in these results. bPolymicrobial defined by multiple genera of organisms identified cIncludes: Micrococcus species, diphtheroids dIncludes: Salmonella, Pasteurella, Citrobacter, Morganella, Acinetobacter, Pasteurella, Burkholderia species, and Gram-negative organisms not otherwise specified eAll fungal infections were identified as Candida species fNumbers may not sum to group totals or percentages as polymicrobial infections with more than one organism were possible Abbreviations: PJI, prosthetic joint infection. Conclusion Incidence rates of early and delayed PJI were significantly higher than late PJI following primary TKA. Gram-negative organisms were more prevalent in early compared to delayed or late PJI. Empiric Gram-negative antibiotic therapy should be considered with a suspected PJI within 3 months after elective primary TKA. Disclosures Alisa Stephens-Shields, PhD, Gilead Sciences: Advisor/Consultant Charles Nelson, MD, Stryker: Advisor/Consultant|Zimmer-Biomet: Advisor/Consultant|Zimmer-Biomet: Grant/Research Support

Surgical helmet systems in total joint arthroplasty: assessment of hood sterility and donning technique

BackgroundThe incidence of prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is increasing, coincident with the rising volume of joint arthroplasty being performed. With recent controversy regarding the efficacy of surgical helmet systems (SHS) in preventing infection, the focus has turned to the correct donning techniques and usage of surgical hoods. The aim of this study was to compare the bacterial contamination of the operating surgeon’s gloves after two common donning techniques of SHS hoods. We also evaluated the baseline sterility of the SHS hoods at the beginning of the procedure.MethodsThe bacterial contamination rate was quantified using colony-forming units (CFUs), with 50 trials performed per donning technique. Samples were cultured on 5% Columbia blood agar in ambient air at 37 °C for 48 h and all subsequent bacterial growth was identified using a MALDI-TOF mass spectrometer. In Group 1, the operating surgeon donned their colleague’s hood. In Group 2, the operating surgeon had their hood applied by a non-scrubbed colleague. After each trial, the operating surgeon immediately inoculated their gloves onto an agar plate. The immediate sterility of 50 SHS hoods was assessed at two separate zones—the screen (Zone 1) and the neckline (Zone 2).ResultsThere was no significant difference in contamination rates between the two techniques (3% vs. 2%, P = 0.99) or between right and left glove contamination rates. Immediately after donning, 6/50 (12%) of SHS hoods cultured an organism. Contamination rates at both the face shield and neckline zones were equivalent. The majority of bacteria cultured were Bacillus species.DiscussionWe found no significant difference in the operating surgeon’s glove contamination using two common SHS hood-donning techniques when they were performed under laminar airflow with late fan activation. We suggest the SHS hood should not be assumed to be completely sterile and that gloves are changed if it is touched intraoperatively.

Development of evidence-based guidelines for the treatment and management of periprosthetic hip infection.

Periprosthetic hip-joint infection is a multifaceted and highly detrimental outcome for patients and clinicians. The incidence of prosthetic joint infection reported within two years of primary hip arthroplasty ranges from 0.8% to 2.1%. Costs of treatment are over five-times greater in people with periprosthetic hip joint infection than in those with no infection. Currently, there are no national evidence-based guidelines for treatment and management of this condition to guide clinical practice or to inform clinical study design. The aim of this study is to develop guidelines based on evidence from the six-year INFection and ORthopaedic Management (INFORM) research programme. We used a consensus process consisting of an evidence review to generate items for the guidelines and online consensus questionnaire and virtual face-to-face consensus meeting to draft the guidelines. The consensus panel comprised 21 clinical experts in orthopaedics, primary care, rehabilitation, and healthcare commissioning. The final output from the consensus process was a 14-item guideline. The guidelines make recommendations regarding increased vigilance and monitoring of those at increased risk of infection; diagnosis including strategies to ensure the early recognition of prosthetic infection and referral to orthopaedic teams; treatment, including early use of DAIR and revision strategies; and postoperative management including appropriate physical and psychological support and antibiotic strategies. We believe the implementation of the INFORM guidelines will inform treatment protocols and clinical pathways to improve the treatment and management of periprosthetic hip infection.

The Risk of Acute Infection Following Intra-Articular Corticosteroid Injection During Total Knee Manipulation Under Anesthesia

BackgroundManipulation under anesthesia (MUA) is an established option for improving motion in patients presenting with early stiffness following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Intra-articular corticosteroid injections (IACI) are sometimes administered adjunctively, yet literature examining their efficacy and safety remains limited. Study DesignRetrospective, Level IV. MethodsA total of 209 patients (TKA = 230) were retrospectively examined to determine the incidence of prosthetic joint infections within 3 months following manipulation with IACI. Approximately 4.9% of initial patients had inadequate follow-up where the presence of infection could not be determined. Range of motion was assessed in patients who had follow-up at or beyond one year (n = 158) and was recorded over multiple time points. ResultsNo infections (0 of 230) were identified within 90 days of receiving IACI during TKA MUA. Before receiving TKA (preindex), patients averaged 111° of total arc of motion and 113° of flexion. Following index procedures, just prior to manipulation (pre-MUA), patients averaged 83° and 86° of total arc and flexion motion, respectively. At final follow-up, patients averaged 110° of total arc of motion and 111° of flexion. At six weeks following manipulation, patients had gained a mean of 25° and 24° of their total arc and flexion motion found at 1 year. This motion was preserved through a 12-month follow-up period. ConclusionAdministering IACI during TKA MUA does not harbor an elevated risk for acute prosthetic joint infections. Additionally, its use is associated with substantial increases in short-term range of motion at six weeks following manipulation, which remain preserved through long-term follow-up.

Risk of Periprosthetic Joint Infection After Intra-Articular Corticosteroid Injection Following Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty

BackgroundPerioperative intra-articular joint injection is a known risk factor for developing prosthetic joint infection (PJI) in the immediate preoperative and postoperative periods for total knee arthroplasty, but is less defined in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). The goal of this study was to elucidate the risk of developing PJI after intra-articular corticosteroid injection (IACI) into a post UKA knee. MethodsA retrospective review of a nationwide administrative claims database was performed from January 2015 to October 2020. Patients who underwent UKA and had an ipsilateral IACI were identified and matched 2:1 to a control group of primary UKA patients who did not receive IACI. Multivariate logistic analyses were conducted to assess differences in PJI rates at 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years. ResultsA total of 47,903 cases were identified, of which 2,656 (5.5%) cases received IACI. The mean time from UKA to IACI was 355 days. The incidence of PJI in the IACI group was 2.7%, compared to 1.3% in the control group. The rate of PJI after IACI was significantly higher than the rate in the control group at 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years (all P < .05). The majority of PJI occurred within the first 6 months following IACI (75%). ConclusionIn this study, IACI in a UKA doubled the risk of PJI compared to patients who did not receive an injection. Surgeons should be aware of this increased risk to aid in their decision-making about injecting into a UKA. Level of EvidenceIII, retrospective comparative study.

Prosthetic Joint Infection and Wound Leakage After the Introduction of Intraoperative Wound Irrigation With a Chlorhexidine-Cetrimide Solution: A Large-Scale Before-After Study

BackgroundIntraoperative chlorhexidine irrigation could be a valuable additive to systemic antibiotics to prevent infections after total joint arthroplasties. However, it may cause cytotoxicity and impair wound healing. This study evaluates the incidence of infection and wound leakage before and after the introduction of intraoperative chlorhexidine lavage. MethodsAll 4453 patients receiving a primary hip or knee prosthesis between 2007 and 2013 in our hospital were retrospectively included. They all underwent intraoperative lavage before wound closure. Initially, wound irrigation with 0.9% NaCl was standard care (n = 2271). In 2008, additional irrigation with a chlorhexidine-cetrimide (CC) solution was gradually introduced (n = 2182). Data on the incidence of prosthetic joint infections and wound leakage, as well as relevant baseline and surgical characteristics, were derived from medical charts. Chi-square analysis was used to compare the incidence of infection and wound leakage between patients with and without CC irrigation. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess robustness of these effects by adjusting for potential confounders. ResultsThe prosthetic infection rate was 2.2% in the group without CC irrigation vs 1.3% in the group with CC irrigation (P = .021). Wound leakage occurred in 15.6% of the group without CC irrigation and in 18.8% of the group with CC irrigation (P = .004). However, multivariable analyses showed that both findings were likely due to confounding variables, rather than by the change in intraoperative CC irrigation. ConclusionsIntraoperative wound irrigation using a CC solution does not seem to affect the risk of prosthetic joint infection or wound leakage. Observational data easily yield misleading results, so prospective randomized studies are needed to verify causal inference. Level of EvidenceLevel III—uncontrolled before and after the study.

Intraosseous Regional Administration of Antibiotic Prophylaxis for Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review

BackgroundIntraosseous regional administration (IORA) of antibiotics after tourniquet inflation has recently been introduced as a technique to deliver antibiotics directly to the surgical site among patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA). MethodsPubMed and Embase were queried for studies reporting on IORA for perioperative prophylaxis during TKA. Primary outcome measures were local tissue antibiotic concentrations and rates of prosthetic joint infection (PJI). Eight studies were included for analysis. Four studies (all randomized controlled trials) compared local tissue concentrations between patients receiving IORA and intravenous (IV) antibiotics. Six studies assessed the rate of PJI among patients receiving IORA versus IV antibiotics. ResultsAll studies found a statistically significant increase in antibiotic concentration in femoral bone and fat samples in patients who were treated with IORA (44.04 μg/g [fat] and 49.3 μg/g [bone] following 500 mg of intraosseous vancomycin) versus IV (3.5 μg/g [fat] and 5.2 μg/g [bone] following 1 g IV of vancomycin). The two studies powered to determine differences in PJI rates found a statistically significant decrease in the rate of PJI among patients receiving IORA versus IV antibiotics. The incidence of PJI in patients treated with IORA and IV antibiotics across all studies was 0.3 and 1.1%, respectively. ConclusionPerioperative IORA of antibiotics in TKA provides local tissue concentrations of antibiotics that are on average 10 times higher than IV administration alone. Although more adequately powered investigations are necessary to determine the effectiveness of IORA in reducing PJI rates, adoption of IORA should be considered in high-risk patients where elevated tissue antibiotic concentrations would be of a maximum benefit.

Intra-articular Hip Injections Prior to Total Hip Arthroplasty: Infection and Cost-Related Associations.

Intra-articular injections prior to total hip arthroplasty (THA) have been associated with postoperative infections. The purpose of this study was to determine whether a temporal relationship exists between hip injections prior to THA and infection. Specifically, we asked (1) Do patients who receive hip injections within 3 months of THA have a higher incidence of prosthetic joint infections (PJIs) or surgical site infections (SSIs)? and (2) Do these patients incur higher 90-day costs? Patients with hip injections prior to THA were identified using a national database from 2010 to 2019. Three laterality-specific groups (injection 0 to 3 months, 3 to 6 months, and 6 to 12 months prior to THA)were compared with a matched cohort without prior injection (n=277,841). Primary outcomes included PJIs, SSIs, and costs. Patients who had injections within 3 months of THA had a higher incidence of PJIs at 90 days (5.1% vs 1.6%, P<.01) and 1 year (6.8% vs 2.1%, P<.01), when compared with the matched cohort. They also had a higher incidence of SSIs at 90 days (2.8% vs 1.2%, P<.01) and 1 year (3.7% vs 1.7%, P<.01). Mean costs were 13.7% higher in this injection cohort. Patients who had injections between 3 and 6 months prior to THA had higher incidence and odds of postoperative PJIs at 90 days (2.6% vs 1.6%, P<.04), whereas those with injections beyond 6 months had no differences in PJIs (P≥.46). Patients who receive hip injections within 3 months of undergoing primary THA are at increased risk for postoperative PJIs, SSIs, and higher costs. This study reaffirms guidelines for when to perform THAs in these populations. [Orthopedics. 2023;46(1):19-26.].

Effectiveness and safety of vancomycin powder injection locally applied in theprevention of prosthetic joint infection

Prosthetic joint infection is a rare but serious complication that is associated with considerable morbidity and financialburdens and other hardships for the individual. The available treatment options for PJI include both surgery andantimicrobial therapy. The surgical option includes debridement, antibiotics and implant retention (DAIR), that is usuallyrecommended at initial stages, one stage or two stage revision arthroplasty at advanced stages. These treatments are muchexpensive and time consuming and have around 11-30% failure rate. Therefore, there is an urgent need for a appropriate andaffordable treatment strategy. Vancomycin serves as an active agent against the pathogens that have ability to causepotential damage to the wounds after surgery. In its powder form, it ensures adequate surgical site concentrations whileminimizing the adverse effects caused by undetectable systemic distribution. Thus, we explored the effectiveness and safetyof vancomycin powder injection locally applied in the prevention of prosthetic joint infection (PJI). A total of 90 inpatientswho underwent total hip and knee arthroplasty from January 2018 to December 2019 were selected and randomly dividedinto control group (routine preventive antibiotic therapy) and treatment group (vancomycin applied based on the treatmentof control group). The incidence of PJI and adverse reactions within 3 months after operation was observed. The changes inbody temperature, neutrophil count, interleukin-6 (IL-6) and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) levels wererecorded before operation and 1, 3 and 7 days after treatment. Ninety days after treatment, the incidence rate of PJI intreatment group (0.00) was significantly lower than that of control group (8.89%) (P <0.05). Within a short period of time (1d and 3 d) after treatment, the body temperature, neutrophil count, IL-6 and hs-CRP levels were all lower in treatment groupthan those in control group (P <0.05). However, the above indices had no significant differences between the two groups at1 week (7 d) after treatment (P >0.05). There were 3 cases (6.67%) and 2 cases (4.44%) of adverse reactions in treatmentgroup and control group, respectively. The incidence rates of adverse reactions were similar (χ2=0.212, P=0.645).Vancomycin powder injection locally applied can control the body temperature, and reduce the neutrophil count, IL-6 andhs-CRP levels within a short period of time after operation, which is superior to routine preventive antibiotic therapy. It candecrease the incidence rate of PJI after arthroplasty.

Risk factors for reoperation due to periprosthetic joint infection after elective total hip arthroplasty: a study of 35,056 patients using linked data of the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Registry (SHAR) and Swedish Perioperative Registry (SPOR)

BackgroundIn Sweden, the incidence of a prosthetic joint infection (PJI) after a planned Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) is 1.3%, but the worldwide incidence of PJI after THA is unknown. This study explores associations between reoperation due to PJI and potential risk factors.MethodsPrimary elective THA surgery registered in both the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Registry (SHAR) and the Swedish Perioperative Registry (SPOR) between 1 January 2015 and 31 December 2019 were included in this registry study, resulting in a total study population of 35,056 cases. The outcome variable was reoperation as the result of PJI within a year after surgery. Data were analysed using a multivariable Cox regression model.ResultsReoperation due to PJI occurred in 460 cases (i.e., 1.3% of the study population). Each year of age increased the risk with 2% (HR 1.02 Cl 1.01, 1.03 P = < 0.001). Compared to men, women had significantly less risk for reoperation (HR 2.17 Cl 1.79, 2.53 P = < 0.001). For patients with obesity (BMI > 30), the risk increased considerably compared to underweight, normal weight, or overweight patients (HR 1.89 Cl 1.43, 2.51 P = < 0.001). The risk also increased by 6% for every 10 min of operative time (HR 1.06 Cl 1.02, 1.09 P = < 0.001). Patients having general anaesthesia had greater risk compared to those with spinal anaesthesia (HR 1.34 Cl 1.04, 1.73 P = 0.024). Finally, a lateral approach showed higher risk of reoperation than a posterior approach (HR 1.43 Cl 1.18, 1.73 P = < 0.001).ConclusionRecognition of the several risk factors identified in this study will be important for the perioperative management of patients undergoing THA.

Does Surgical Trainee Participation Affect Infection Outcomes in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty?

To evaluate whether the involvement of surgeons-in-training was associated with increased infection rates, including both prosthetic joint infection (PJI) and surgical site infection (SSI), following primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This was a retrospective review of outcomes following primary total knee arthroplasty. Surgeries were divided into two groups: (a) attending-only and (b) trainee-involved. Association with PJI and SSI were evaluated with univariate analysis and multivariate analysis to adjust for sex, age, body mass index (BMI), Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), year of surgery, operative time, and hospital/surgeon volume. A single, large North-American integrated healthcare system between January 1, 2014 and December 31, 2017. A total of 12,664 primary TKAs with a minimum of one-year (mean of 2-years, range 1-4.5) follow-up were evaluated. Residents and fellows were more likely to participate in cases with longer operative times (p<0.001) than the attending-only group. A significant difference existed on univariate analysis between the trainee-involved group and attending-only group for PJI incidence (p=0.015) but not for SSI (p=0.840). After adjusting for patient- and procedure-related features, however, neither PJI nor SSI were independently associated with trainee involvement (PJI: p=0.089; SSI: p=0.998). Trainee participation did not directly correlate with increased infection risk, despite their association with longer-operative times and increased medical complexity. Further approaches to mitigating the risk of SSI and PJI for patients with increased comorbidities and in complex TKA cases, which demand longer operative times, are still required.

Seasonal Relationship of Prosthetic Joint Infection Following Primary Total Joint Arthroplasty in a Subtropical Climate: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Background: One devastating complication that leads to increased morbidity and mortality rates after total joint arthroplasty (TJA) is prosthetic joint infection (PJI). Evidence on the relationship between climate, seasonality, and the risk of developing a PJI conflicts. The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of seasonality and climate change on the rate of PJI. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed data of patients undergoing primary TJA at a single institution in a subtropical climate location from 2012 to 2015. Only primary TJAs with a minimum of 1-year follow-up were included in the analysis. Patient demographics and complications were extracted from the database, and monthly average temperature, humidity, and precipitation were obtained. The primary endpoint was PJI requiring revision surgery within 1 year of the index procedure. Results: A total of 3,696 TJAs met the inclusion criteria, with 28 PJIs requiring a second surgery within 1 year (0.76%). We found no significant difference in age, sex, or body mass index in patients who developed a PJI (P=0.9450, P=0.0989, and P=0.7942, respectively). The highest incidence of PJI occurred in August (1.49%), but the incidence of PJI by month was not significant (P=0.8996). July and August were the hottest (91 °F) and most humid (79%) months, and June had the most average precipitation (8.06 inches); however, these climate variables were not significant contributors to the incidence of PJI (P=0.4996, P=0.4999, and P=0.4957, respectively). Conclusion: We found no association between temperature, humidity, and development of PJI in a North American subtropical climate. Surgeons can use this information to counsel patients when planning for TJA.

815. Short-Course vs. Extended-Course Perioperative Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Patients Receiving Unilateral Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty

Abstract Background International guidelines recommend up to 24 hours of perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis (AP) in joint replacement procedures. However, some observational studies support AP beyond 24 hours for the prevention of surgical site infections (SSI) and prosthetic joint infections (PJI), and this practice is also observed in our institution. This study aims to evaluate the incidence of SSI and PJI in patients receiving short- vs extended-course AP after unilateral primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) at our center. Methods This was a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent elective unilateral primary TKA from October to December 2019 at Singapore General Hospital. Patients were excluded if they received antibiotics for reasons other than post-operative AP or underwent other procedures in addition to unilateral primary TKA. Data was collected from electronic medical records and patients who received a short-course of AP (≤24 hours) were compared with patients who received an extended-course of AP. Primary outcomes were 30-day SSI and 30-day PJI rates. Secondary outcome was the impact of duration of AP on length of stay. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS software version 20. Results There were 394 patients included in the study. 247 received short-course and 147 received extended-course AP. There were no differences in demographics (Table 1). Amongst those who received extended-course AP, median duration was 7 (IQR 4, 8) days, during which 119 (81.0%) patients switched from intravenous to oral route of antibiotics. Between the short- and extended-course arms, there were no differences observed in 30-day SSI (6.9% vs 6.1%, p=0.769) or PJI rates (0.4% vs 0.7%, p=0.999). However, extended-course AP was associated with a longer median length of stay (4 [IQR 3, 6] vs 5 [IQR 4, 7] days, p=0.001). In a subgroup analysis of 106 diabetic patients, there were no differences in 30-day SSI rates (12.3% vs 9.8%, p=0.763) and 30-day PJI rates (0% vs 2.4%, p=0.387) between both groups. Conclusion In this single center study, short-course AP in elective TKA was safe and effective. Extending AP did not reduce SSI or PJI rates, even in diabetic patients. In addition, extending AP was associated with increased length of stay, which translates to higher healthcare costs. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Prosthetic joint infections and legal disputes: a threat to the future of prosthetic orthopedics

Prosthetic joint infections (PJI) represent one of the major problems in orthopedic prosthetic surgery. The incidence of PJIs varies according to the site of intervention, and different published case studies report occurrence at 0.5 to 3.0% in the event of first implants, with a significant greater risk in the case of prosthesis revisions. The diagnosis of prosthetic infections is seldom simple, needing a multi-specialist approach, which includes the accurate collection of patient anamnesis, its clinical evaluation, the evaluation of inflammation biomarkers, and the use of imaging techniques. It is essential to identify the bacteria responsible for the infection not only for an accurate diagnosis, but also to select the correct antibiotic treatment. Failure to identify the bacteria involved makes it impossible to establish targeted systemic antibiotic therapy. In developed countries such as Italy, the right to health is guaranteed by the Constitution, where the institutions that provide health services must be staffed by a team of medical professionals that can guarantee the safest possible health pathways. Risk management represents the set of actions aimed at improving the quality of the care provided, the adherence to guidelines and good care practices with the final objective of guaranteeing patients’ safety. All hospitals, including the ones where prosthetic orthopedic surgery is performed, must adopt clinical risk management procedures which, through prospective tools aimed at preventing errors and complications and by retrospective methods, permit the identification of critical points in the different phases of the process and propose actions for improvement. The constant increase in litigation for malpractice in Western countries, especially in Italy, calls for special attention to the problem of PJIs and the in-depth assessment of medico-legal problems, also considering the new legislative initiatives in the field of medical malpractice. Hospitals need to tackle the onset of PJIs in a transparent and linear fashion by constantly informing the patient on their progress.