Incidence Of Portal Vein Thrombosis Research Articles

Predictive value of hepatic venous pressure gradient in cirrhotic portal vein thrombosis development

Background & AimsThere are lots of risk factors reported for cirrhotic portal vein thrombosis (PVT) development, however, the relationship between hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) and PVT development remains unclear. MethodsThe clinical outcomes of cirrhotic patients who had no PVT and underwent HVPG measurement at baseline between March 2018 and March 2022 were analyzed retrospectively. Screening for non-tumoral PVT development was implemented by contrast-enhanced computed tomography and/or magnetic resonance imaging every 6-12 months. ResultsEighty-two cirrhotic patients were evaluated over a follow-up period. Of these, 12 patients (14.6%) experienced the development of PVT. The occurrence of non-tumoral PVT at one, two, and three years were 6.6%, 11.7%, and 22.2% respectively. HVPG (p=0.038;HR 1.07;95%CI 1.00-1.14) and alcohol liver disease (ALD) (p=0.019;HR 4.20;95%CI 1.27-13.89) were independently associated with a high PVT risk. The cutoff value of HVPG was 17.52 mmHg. The cumulative incidence of PVT differed significantly among groups stratified by HVPG thresholds of 16mmHg (P=0.011). The sensitivity and specificity of HVPG≥16mmHg in predicting PVT development were 100.0% and 35.7%. ConclusionsIn patients with liver cirrhosis, the value of HVPG was the independent predictive factor of PVT development. Screening for PVT was recommended during follow-up in patients with HVPG≥16 mmHg.

A comprehensive analysis of portal vein thrombosis in malignancy.

e24042 Background: Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is a rare venous thromboembolism, is often linked to cirrhosis, infection, and malignancy. Advancements in imaging have noted an increasing incidence of PVT, particularly in solid cancers. Treating PVT with malignancy is challenging due to lack of data, poor recanalization, and substantial bleeding risk with anticoagulation. This study aims to enhance understanding of malignancy-related PVT, anticoagulation trends, and assess prognosis. Methods: We conducted a multicenter, observational retrospective analysis of patients diagnosed with PVT (ICD code 452,181) from 2013 to 2023. Inclusion criteria: age > 18 and acute portal vein thrombosis. Exclusion criteria: presence of tumor thrombosis, and thrombus in other splanchnic vessels (e.g., mesenteric vein). Data entry was performed on a study-specific REDCap database. Patients with concomitant malignancy were identified and further assessed for cancer type, anticoagulation use, bleeding outcomes, and prognosis. Proportion analysis using Z test was done to compare outcomes between groups. Results: In our study of 583 patients, 236 (40.48%) had concurrent malignancy, predominantly male (144, 61.01%),and female (92, 38.98%) mean age 65. Common malignancies included HCC (28.38%), pancreatic (24.15%), colo-rectal (11.86%), cholangiocarcinoma (8.47%), myeloproliferative neoplasm, prostate, and gynecological cancers each (2.96%), and other cancers (18.22%). 41% had metastasis to liver. Cirrhosis was present in 40%, particularly in HCC patients (89%). Of the total,163 (69%) received anticoagulation; 26.38% showed improvement or re-canalization within a year. The primary anticoagulants were Direct Oral Anticoagulants (DOACs) (57%), with an increasing trend in the last 5 years (69.44%), followed by Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin (LMWH) (19%) and warfarin (14%). Most patients initiated on heparin infusion (9.81%) transitioned to hospice care. Bleeding events in patients receiving DOAC versus LMWH + Warfarin were 36.55% and 33.33%, respectively (p = 0.69). Patients without anticoagulation demonstrated a higher one-year mortality compared to those with anticoagulation (83.56% vs. 63.19%, p value < 0.05). Overall,malignancy-associated PVT had a significantly higher case fatality rate than non-malignancy cases, regardless of anticoagulation (81.35% vs. 32.85%, p < 0.05). Conclusions: There is a significant association between malignancy and PVT, particularly in HCC and pancreatic cancer. The increased mortality in malignancy-related PVT emphasizes the critical role of anticoagulation, which has demonstrated efficacy in improving outcomes, including one-year mortality. Although DOACs have seen increased use in the last 5 years, bleeding events have remained comparable. Further research is warranted to explore patient selection for optimal anticoagulation strategies.

Portal vein thrombosis in gastrointestinal cancers: Insights into prevalence and prognosis—A nationwide inpatient analysis 2018-2020.

e16382 Background: The relation between cancer and thrombotic events has been well established over the past decade. Cancer is a prothrombotic state and thrombosis is the second most common cause of death in cancer. While portal vein thrombosis (PVT) has been extensively studied in individuals with Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC), its significance in other Gastrointestinal (GI) cancers is often overlooked. This study aims to investigate the prevalence and prognostic impact of PVT across various GI cancers. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on the National Inpatient Sample database (2018-2020) and the ICD-10 codes to identify the patients > 18 years old with primary diagnosis of GI cancers (pancreatic, HCC, gastric, small intestinal[SI], colorectal). Prevalence of PVT in individual GI cancers and effect of PVT on mortality, length of stay and Hospital cost utilization was studied. Multivariable regression analyses were performed adjusting for demographics, hospital-level characteristics, and relevant comorbidities. These included Age, Sex, Race, obesity, Smoking, Hypertension, Diabetes, CKD, liver disease, CHF, CAD, Hypothyroidism. Results: Our study analyzed data from 2,313,888 individuals with GI cancers, Including HCC, Gastric cancer, SI cancer, colorectal and pancreatic cancer, The incidence of PVT varied across cancer types, with 12.9% in pancreatic cancer, 0.74% in HCC, 0.99% in gastric cancer, 0.47% in colorectal cancer, and 3.6% in pancreatic cancer. Multivariate regression analysis, adjusting for confounders, revealed a significant association between PVT and increased mortality in various GI cancers. Specifically, the odds ratio (OR) for mortality in pancreatic cancer was 1.31 (p < 0.001), in HCC was 1.39 (p < 0.001), in gastric cancer was 1.88 (p < 0.001), and in colorectal cancer was 2.10 (p < 0.001). However, the incidence of mortality in SI cancer did not yield a significant result OR 1.42 [p- value 0.369] [Table 1]. Additionally, Our findings revealed an increase in length of stay and total healthcare resource utilization across all GI cancers for individuals with PVT compared to without PVT. Conclusions: There is a statistically significant effect of symptomatic and asymptomatic PVT on mortality in various other GI cancers in addition to HCC, which has been established and studied widely. Further prospective studies are needed to study the effect of diagnosing PVT earlier in the disease to predict mortality and other major complications in GI cancers.[Table: see text]

Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease related cirrhosis and incidence of portal vein thrombosis.

There is heterogeneous data on whether metabolic-associated steatohepatitis is an independent risk factor for portal vein thrombosis (PVT). We aim to compare the incidence of PVT in patients with cirrhosis with and without metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). This is a single-center retrospective study of patients with cirrhosis seen between 1 January 2016 and 31 January 2021. Patients with a history of hepatocellular cancer, liver transplant, Budd-Chiari syndrome, and intra-abdominal malignancies were excluded. Patients with cirrhosis were followed from their first hepatology visit for 180 days to determine the incidence of PVT. Cox proportional hazard regression was used to determine the relationship between MASLD with PVT. We analyzed data from 2785 patients with cirrhosis who met inclusion and exclusion criteria [mean age: 61.0 ± 12.3 years, 44.3% female, 63.8% Whites and mean model for end-stage liver disease-sodium (MELD-Na) score: 11.7 ± 6.1]. MASLD was present in 21.7% of patients. A total of 89 patients developed PVT during the follow-up, which was fewer in patients with MASLD [2.0% vs. 3.5%, P = 0.04, unadjusted heart rate (HR): 0.60, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.27-0.96, P = 0.04]. After adjusting for the demographics, MASLD-related comorbid conditions and MELD-Na score, MASLD was associated with a lower incidence of PVT as compared to non-MASLD cirrhosis (HR: 0.44, 95% CI: 0.21-0.92, P = 0.03). After adjusting for the indicators of Child-Pugh Turcotte score, the risk of PVT in patients with MASLD compared to non-MASLD was not statistically significant (HR: 0.50, 95% CI: 0.22-1.13, P = 0.096). PVT incidence was lower in patients with MASLD cirrhosis as compared to non-MASLD cirrhosis. However, the difference was not significantly different after adjusting for liver decompensation.

Association between Portal Vein Thrombosis after Umbilical Vein Catheterization and Neonatal Asphyxia

Introduction: Neonatal portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is frequently related to umbilical venous catheterization (UVC), but risk factors remain unclear. This study aims to analyze the variables associated to PVT in near- to full-term newborns with UVC, with a focus on newborns exposed to controlled therapeutic hypothermia (CTH) for hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy (HIE). Methods: This is retrospective cohort study of infants delivered at or after 36 weeks and with a birthweight over 1,500 g. All infants were assessed for UVC location and PVT using ultrasonography performed between day 5 and day 10 after catheterization. Results: Among 213 eligible patients, PVT was diagnosed in 57 (27%); among them, 54 (95%) were localized in the left portal vein branch. With all significant factors in univariate analysis considered, higher gestational age at birth (adjusted OR 1.35; 95% CI: 1.12–1.64, p = 0.002) and duration of UVC placement (adjusted OR 1.36; 95% CI: 1.11–1.67, p = 0.004) were the main risk factors of PVT. Among 87 infants who were cooled for HIE, 31 (36%) had PVT compared to 26 (21%) in infants without CTH. Using a multivariate model including variables linked to treatment procedures only, an increased PVT incidence was statistically associated with UVC duration (adjusted OR 1.33; 95% CI: 1.08; 1.63, p = 0.01) and CTH (adjusted OR 1.94; 95% CI: 1.04–3.65, p = 0.04). Conclusion: Left PVT was frequently observed in near- to full-term neonates with UVC. Among factors linked to treatment procedures, both duration of UVC and CTH exposure for HIE were found to be independent risk factors of PVT.

Primary liver transplantation vs transplant after Kasai portoenterostomy in children with biliary atresia: A retrospective Brazilian single-center cohort.

Biliary atresia (BA) is the most common indication for pediatric liver trans plantation, although portoenterostomy is usually performed first. However, due to the high failure rate of portoenterostomy, liver transplantation has been advocated as the primary procedure for patients with BA. It is still unclear if a previous portoenterostomy has a negative impact on liver transplantation outcomes. To investigate the effect of prior portoenterostomy in infants un dergoing liver transplantation for BA. This was a retrospective cohort study of 42 pediatric patients with BA who underwent primary liver transplantation from 2013 to 2023 at a single tertiary center in Brazil. Patients with BA were divided into two groups: Those under going primary liver transplantation without portoenterostomy and those undergoing liver transplantation with prior portoenterostomy. Continuous variables were compared using the Student's t-test or the Kruskal-Wallis test, and categorical variables were compared using the χ2 or Fisher's exact test, as appropriate. Multivariable Cox regression analysis was performed to determine risk factors for portal vein thrombosis. Patient and graft survival analyses were conducted with the Kaplan-Meier product-limit estimator, and patient subgroups were compared using the two-sided log-rank test. Forty-two patients were included in the study (25 [60%] girls), 23 undergoing liver transplantation without prior portoenterostomy, and 19 undergoing liver transplantation with prior portoenterostomy. Patients with prior portoenterostomy were older (12 vs 8 months; P = 0.02) at the time of liver transplantation and had lower Pediatric End-Stage Liver Disease scores (13.2 vs 21.4; P = 0.01). The majority of the patients (35/42, 83%) underwent living-donor liver transplantation. The group of patients without prior portoenterostomy appeared to have a higher incidence of portal vein thrombosis (39 vs 11%), but this result did not reach statistical significance. Prior portoenterostomy was not a protective factor against portal vein thrombosis in the multivariable analysis after adjusting for age at liver transplantation, graft-to-recipient weight ratio, and use of vascular grafts. Finally, the groups did not significantly differ in terms of post-transplant survival. In our study, prior portoenterostomy did not significantly affect the outcomes of liver transplantation.

Predictors of portal vein thrombosis after splenectomy in patients with cirrhosis.

Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is a commonthsn complication after splenectomy in patients with cirrhosis. However, the predictors of postoperative PVT are not known. To investigate the predictors of PVT after splenectomy in patient with cirrhosis. A total of 45 patients with cirrhosis who underwent splenectomy were consecutively enrolled from January 2017 to December 2018. The incidence of PVT at 1 months, 3 months, and 12 months after splenectomy in patients with cirrhosis was observed. The hematological indicators, biochemical and coagulation parameters, and imaging features were recorded at baseline and at each observation point. The univariable, multivariable, receiver operating characteristic curve and time-dependent curve analyses were performed. The cumulative incidence of PVT was 40.0%, 46.6%, and 48.9% at 1 months, 3 months, and 12 months after splenectomy. Multivariable analysis showed that portal vein diameter (PVD) ≥ 14.5 mm and monthsdel‎ end-stage liver disease (MELD) score > 10 were independent predictors of PVT at 1 months, 3 months, and 12 months after splenectomy (P < 0.05). Time-dependent curve showed that the cumulative incidence of PVT was significantly different between patients with MELD score ≤ 10 and > 10 (P < 0.05). In addition, the cumulative incidence of PVT in the PVD ≥ 14.5 mm group was significantly higher than that in the PVD < 14.5 mm group (P < 0.05). Wider PVD and MELD score > 10 were independent predictors of PVT at 1 months, 3 months, and 12 months after splenectomy in patient with cirrhosis.

Statin use in cirrhosis and its association with incidence of portal vein thrombosis.

Statin use has shown a reduction in hepatic decompensation and portal hypertension. Its association with portal vein thrombosis (PVT) incidence is unknown. We aim to compare the incidence of PVT in patients with and without statin use. We excluded patients with a history of hepatocellular cancer, liver transplants, Budd-Chiari syndrome, and intra-abdominal malignancies. Patients with cirrhosis were followed from their first hepatologist clinical encounter (January 1, 2016, to January 31, 2021) for 180days to determine PVT incidence. We tested the association of statin use with PVT using 1:1 propensity score (PS) matching and Cox proportional hazard regression. We analyzed 2785 patients with cirrhosis (mean age:61.0±12.3years, 44.3% female, 63.8% White, mean MELD-Na score:11.7±6.1, and statin use:23.1%). A total of 89 patients developed PVT during the follow-up, which was lower in patients with statin use as compared to no statin use (1.3% vs 3.8%, P=0.001, unadjusted HR:0.28, 95% CI: 0.13-0.62, P=0.001). After matching for demographics, comorbidities, and hepatic decompensation events, patients with statin use had a lower risk of developing PVT in 180-day follow-up as compared to those without statin use (HR:0.24, 95% CI: 0.10-0.55, P=0.001). Subgroup analysis showed that statin use was associated with lower PVT incidence in non-NASH (HR: 0.20, 95% CI: 0.07-0.54, P=0.002) and decompensated cirrhosis (HR: 0.12, 95% CI:0.03-0.53, P=0.005) than no statin use. PVT incidence was lower in decompensated cirrhosis patients with statin use than in those with no statin use. However, this finding needs to be further tested in randomized control trials.

A nomogram model to predict the portal vein thrombosis risk after surgery in patients with pancreatic cancer.

Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is a common postoperative complication in patients with pancreatic cancer (PC), significantly affecting their quality of life and long-term prognosis. Our aim is to establish a new nomogram to predict the risk of PVT after PC surgery. We collected data from 416 patients who underwent PC surgery at our hospital between January 2011 and June 2022. This includes 87 patients with PVT and 329 patients without PVT. The patients were randomly divided into a training group and a validation group at a ratio of 7:3. We constructed a nomogram model using the outcomes from both univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses conducted on the training group. The nomogram's predictive capacity was assessed using calibration curve, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, and decision curve analysis (DCA). In the study, the prevalence of PVT was 20.9%. Age, albumin, vein reconstruction and preoperative D-dimer were independent related factors. The model achieved a C-index of 0.810 (95% confidence interval: 0.752-0.867), demonstrating excellent discrimination and calibration performance. The area under the ROC curve of the nomogram was 0.829 (95% CI: 0.750-0.909) in the validation group. DCA confirmed that the nomogram model was clinically useful when the incidence of PVT in patients was 5%-60%. We have established a high-performance nomogram for predicting the risk of PVT in patients undergoing PC surgery. This will assist clinical doctors in identifying individuals at high risk of PVT and taking appropriate preventive measures.

Allogeneic Vessels in Pancreaticoduodenectomy with Portal Vein Resection: Risk of Portal Vein Thrombosis and Prognosis

BackgroundAllogeneic vessels (AV) are commonly used in pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) with portal vein resection (PVR), but the epidemiological characteristics of portal vein thrombosis (PVT) are still unclear. MethodsThe clinicopathological data of patients who underwent PD combined with PVR in our hospital from January 2011 to October 2022 were retrospectively collected. All patients underwent regular contrast-enhanced CT of the abdomen after surgery to identify PVT or recurrence and metastasis of the tumor. ResultsA total of 878 patients received PD, of which 213 patients who also underwent PVR were included in the study. Among them are 16 (7.5%) tangential/patch reconstructions, 51 (23.9%) end-to-end anastomosis, and 146 (68.5%) AV reconstructions. The cumulative incidence of PVT in 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, and 3 years after surgery was 0.9%, 7.3%, 7.3%, 15.9%, 23.4%, and 27.6%, respectively. The results of logistic regression analysis showed that diabetes, operation procedure, and AV reconstruction were independent risk factors for PVT (P < 0.05). In the Cox analysis, PVT was clearly correlated with tumor recurrence (P = 0.038, hazard ratio (HR) = 1.553) and overall survival (P = 0.044, HR = 1.592) of pancreatic cancer patients. ConclusionThe prevalence of PVT is high in PD with PVR, particularly in patients undergoing AV reconstructions. The occurrence of PVT has a clear correlation with the patient’s long-term prognosis.

Surgical strategies to treat portal vein thrombosis during adult liver transplantation.

The incidence of portal vein thrombosis (PVT) at the time of liver transplantation (LT) may be variable and underestimated. Therefore, preoperative diagnosis and stratification of its extension is so relevant for adequate surgical planning. Revascularization of the portal vein graft becomes essential for graft and patient survival after LT. Early stages of PVT may be managed with eversion thrombectomy and end-to-end anastomoses. However, severe PVT (grades 3 and 4) poses significant challenges for patients requiring LT, resulting in more complex surgeries and higher complication rates. To address these complexities, various surgical techniques have been developed, including collateral alternative vessel utilization, renoportal anastomoses, mesoportal jump graft placement, cavoportal hemitranspositions, portal vein arterialization, or even multivisceral transplantation. We herein describe the preoperative surgical planning as well as the different surgical strategies possible to treat portal vein thrombosis during LT. A comprehensive preoperative evaluation of PVT is crucial for accurately assessing its extent and severity. This information is vital for proper surgical planning, which ultimately prepares both the surgeon and the patient for potentially complex procedures during LT. The surgical alternatives presented in this technical report offer promising solutions for treating PVT during LT, making it a viable option for selected patients.

Preexisting portal vein thrombosis and adult LDLT: A retrospective cohort analysis

BackgroundPortal Vein Thrombosis (PVT) is a common concern in cirrhotic patients awaiting liver transplantation (LT), with high morbidity and mortality rates. While preexisting PVT was traditionally considered a contraindication for the LT procedure, recent advances in surgical techniques have provided new possibilities for operating on these patients. This retrospective cohort study compared the surgical outcomes of adult living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) patients with and without preexisting PVT. MethodsThe study analyzed data from 416 liver transplant recipients and included 270 patients without PVT and 69 patients with PVT who underwent LDLT between March 2019 and March 2023. Preoperative imaging methods and intraoperative assessments were used to diagnose PVT and classify the extent of the thrombus using the Yerdel classification. Various surgical techniques were employed to remove the thrombus and establish a portal flow to the graft. Postoperatively, patients were monitored for complications and followed up regularly. ResultsThere were no significant differences between the non-PVT and PVT groups regarding recipient age, gender, body mass index, primary disease leading to transplantation, Child-Pugh class, or Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score. The operative variables, including graft type, duration of surgery, and cold and warm ischemia times, were also similar between the groups. The surgical procedures varied based on the Yerdel classification grade of PVT, with most patients undergoing partial or complete thrombectomy. The mean hospital stays, intensive care unit (ICU) stay duration, and reexploration rates were comparable between the non-PVT and PVT groups. However, the incidence of portal vein thrombosis was significantly higher in the PVT group (p < 0.001). Other complications, such as portal vein stenosis and hepatic artery thrombosis, occurred in a small number of patients. ConclusionThis retrospective cohort analysis demonstrates the feasibility of performing LDLT in patients with preexisting PVT using various surgical techniques. While the overall surgical outcomes and postoperative complications were comparable between patients with and without PVT, the incidence of portal vein thrombosis was higher in the PVT group. Further studies are needed to explore optimal management strategies for PVT in LDLT patients and improve outcomes in this population.

Comparison of prevention and treatment of portal vein thrombosis between proximal splenic vein ligation followed by postoperative transcatheter anticoagulant therapy and systemic anticoagulant therapy in patients with cirrhotic portal hypertension

AbstractAimsSplenectomy combined with pericardial devascularization is one of the important methods to treat hypersplenism, gastrointestinal bleeding, and other complications caused by liver cirrhosis; however, it is accompanied by a high risk of portal vein thrombosis (PVT). This study aimed to explore the preventive and therapeutic effects of proximal splenic vein ligation (PSVL) with postoperative transcatheter anticoagulant therapy (TCAT) on PVT.MethodsThis study retrospectively selected 143 patients with liver cirrhosis and portal hypertension, who received splenectomy combined with pericardial devascularization from June 30, 2018 to June 30, 2021. According to computed tomography photography, within 1 week before the operation, the patients were divided into a prevention group (without preoperative PVT, n = 112) and a treatment group (preoperative PVT, n = 31). Then, each group was subdivided based on the treatment and prevention measures into PSVL + TCAT (n = 70) and systemic anticoagulant therapy (SAT) subgroups (n = 73). The preventive and therapeutic effects of PSVL followed by TCAT on PVT were analyzed.ResultsThe operation time in the PSVL + TCAT subgroups was longer than that in the SAT subgroups (185 ± 76 min vs. 161 ± 55 min; p &lt; 0.01). There was no difference between the two subgroups in terms of operative bleeding (345 ± 82 mL vs. 336 ± 65 mL; p &gt; 0.50). There was no operative death, and all patients recovered uneventfully. In the prevention group, procedure‐related complications occurred in two patients in the PSVL + TCAT subgroup (3.7% [2/54]), including one patient with slight pancreatitis and one patient with chylous leakage, owing to mobilization of the pancreas. The PVT incidence in the prevention group was significantly different between the two subgroups at postoperative 7th day, 3rd month, and 6th month (PSVL + TCAT: 0%, 11.1%, and 5.6% vs. SAT: 39.7%, 31.0%, and 20.7%, respectively; all p &lt; 0.05). In the treatment group, the thrombus regression rate at postoperative 7th day and disappearance rates at the 3rd month and the 6th month of the PSVL + TCAT subgroup were significantly higher than those in the SAT subgroup after anticoagulant and thrombolysis therapy (PSVL + TCAT: 75.0%, 68.8%, and 87.5% vs. SAT: 20.0%, 26.7%, and 40.0%; all p &lt; 0.05).ConclusionsPSVL + TCAT reduces the risk of PVT after splenectomy and is safe and effective in treating PVT during surgery for portal hypertension.

Epidemiology, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Portal Vein Thrombosis

In recent years, the incidence of portal vein thrombosis (PVT) in patients with cirrhosis has increased; the thrombosis ranges from asymptomatic partial to complete occlusion. Treatment is difficult. Anticoagulation therapy may be the optimal first-line treatment for patients with acute PVT who lack variceal bleeding or mesenteric ischemia. Minimally invasive treatment options include mechanical thrombectomy, chemical thrombolysis, and stent placement. However, the effectiveness and timing of anticoagulation and interventional therapies remain unclear.

Natural history of portal vein thrombosis in cirrhosis: A systematic review with meta-analysis.

Progression of liver disease in cirrhosis is associated with an increased incidence of portal vein thrombosis (PVT) in cirrhosis. However, evidence suggests that spontaneous recanalization of PVT may occur even without anti-thrombotic therapy. Thus, the present meta-analysis was conducted to study the natural history of PVT in cirrhosis, facilitating decisions regarding anticoagulation. Three electronic databases were searched from 2000 to August 2022 for studies reporting the outcome of PVT in cirrhotics without anticoagulation. The pooled proportions with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using a random-effect model. A total of 26 studies (n=1441) were included in the final analysis. Progression of PVT on follow-up was seen in 22.2% (95% CI 16.1-28.4), while 77.7% (95% CI 71.6-83.9) remained non-progressive (improved or stable). The most common outcome was a stable PVT with a pooled event rate of 44.6% (95% CI 34.4-54.7). The pooled rates of regression and complete recanalization of PVT in cirrhotics were 29.3% (95% CI 20.9-37.7) and 10.4% (95% CI 5.0-15.8), respectively. On follow-up after improvement, pooled recurrence rate of PVT was 24.0% (95% CI 14.7-33.4). MELD score, and presence of ascites had a negative association, while a longer follow-up duration had positive association with PVT regression. Approximately 25% of the cases of PVT in cirrhosis are progressive, 30% cases improve, and 45% remain stable. Future studies are needed to analyze the predictors of spontaneous regression.

Interventional Approach to Portal Vein Thrombosis and Liver Transplantation: State of the Art.

Porto-mesenteric vein thrombosis (PVT) is a well-recognized but uncommon disease entity in patients with and without cirrhosis. Given the complexity of these patients, there are many differing treatment algorithms depending on the individual circumstances of a given patient. The focus of this review is primarily patients with cirrhosis, with an emphasis on liver transplantation considerations. The presence of cirrhosis substantially affects work-up, prognosis, and management of these patients and will substantially affect the patient treatment and have additional implications for prognosis and long-term outcomes. Here, we review the incidence of portal vein thrombosis in known cirrhotic patients, medical and interventional treatment options that are currently used, and, in particular, how to approach cirrhotic patients with PVT who are awaiting liver transplantation.

Portal vein thrombosis in cirrhosis: A literature review.

Portal Vein Thrombosis (PVT), a common complication of advanced liver disease, is defined as an obstruction of the portal vein due to thrombus formation that can extend to the superior mesenteric and splenic veins. It was believed that PVT occurred predominantly due to prothrombotic potential. However, recent studies have shown that decreased blood flow related to portal hypertension appears to increase PVT risk as per Virchow's triad. It is well known that there is a higher incidence of PVTs in cirrhosis with a higher MELD and Child Pugh score. The controversy for management of PVTs in cirrhotics lies in the individualized assessment of risks versus benefits of anticoagulation, since these patients have a complex hemostatic profile with both bleeding and procoagulant propensities. In this review, we will systematically compile the etiology, pathophysiology, clinical features, and management of portal vein thrombosis in cirrhosis.

Increased Factor VIII Activity Is Predictive of the Occurrence of Portal Vein Thrombosis in Cirrhosis.

The aim of this study was to identify the role of factor VIII (FVIII) in portal vein thrombosis (PVT) occurrence in cirrhotic patients with gastroesophageal variceal bleeding. A total of 453 cirrhotic patients with gastroesophageal varices were enrolled. Computed tomography was performed at baseline and patients were divided into PVT and non-PVT groups (n = 131 vs. 322). Individuals without PVT at baseline were followed up for the development of PVT. Time-dependent receiver operating characteristic analysis of FVIII for PVT development was performed. The Kaplan-Meier methodology was used to analyze the predictive ability of FVIII for PVT incidence at 1 year. FVIII activity (177.00 vs. 153.70, p = 0.001) was significantly increased in the PVT group compared with the non-PVT group in cirrhotic patients with gastroesophageal varices. FVIII activity was positively correlated with the severity of PVT (161.50 vs. 171.07 vs. 187.05%, p = 0.001). Furthermore, FVIII activity (hazard ratio [HR]: 3.48, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.14-10.68, p = 0.029 in model 1; HR: 3.29, 95% CI: 1.03-10.51, p = 0.045 in model 2) was an independent risk factor of 1-year PVT development in patients without PVT at baseline, which was confirmed by two separate Cox regression analysis and competing risk models. Patients with elevated FVIII activity exhibit a higher incidence of PVT in the non-PVT group at 1 year (15.17 vs. 3.16%, p < 0.001). The predictive value of FVIII remains significant in individuals who have never received splenectomy (14.76 vs. 3.04%, p = 0.002). Elevated FVIII activity was potentially associated with the occurrence and the severity of PVT. It might be helpful to identify cirrhotic patients at risk of PVT.

Prevalence of Portal Vein Thrombosis in Budd-Chiari Syndrome Patients

Background and Aim: Thrombosis of the portal vein or obstruction of the hepatic venous outflow tract is the cause of portal vein thrombosis (PVT) and Budd-Chiari syndrome (BCS). Patients with PVT may experience a shorter survival rate compared to those without. The present study aimed to determine the portal vein thrombosis occurrence in Budd-Chiari syndrome patients. Patients and Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted on 46 Budd-Chiari syndrome patients in Gastroenterology department of DHQ Teaching Hospital and Mufti Mahmood Memorial Hospital, Dera Ismail Khan from November 2021 to October 2022. Written informed consent was taken from each individual. Doppler ultrasonography (colored-pulsed) was used to confirm the PVT and BCS cases. Clinical data, laboratory findings, and radiological data were recorded. SPSS version 26 was used for data analysis. Results: The overall mean age of the BCS patients was 28.34±4.6 years. The prevalence of portal vein thrombosis in BCS patients was 12.8% (n=6). Of the total cases, the incidence of chronic and acute BCS presentation was 42 (91.3%) and 4 (8.7%) respectively. The most prevalent symptoms of BCS were abdominal pain and abdominal enlargement in 38 (82.6%) and 41 (89.1%) respectively. Hepatomegaly and ascites were most prevalent clinical signs found in 36 (78.3%) and 37 (80.4%) respectively. The incidence of esophageal varices, gastric extension, and fundal varices were 32 (69.6%), 4 (8.7%), and 2 (4.3%) respectively. About 21 (45.7%) cases had Portal hypertensive gastropathy (PHG). Conclusion: A higher incidence of PVT was observed in the present study than previously reported. Sociodemographic data and underlying etiology of BCS were not significantly different between patients with and without PVT. Those with PVT were more likely to experience hepatic tenderness, increased white blood cells, and increased direct bilirubin. PVT and other patients had similar Doppler ultrasound findings. Keywords: Portal vein thrombosis, Prevalence, Budd-Chiari syndrome

HEPATOSPLENIC SCHISTOSOMIASIS-ASSOCIATED CHRONIC PORTAL VEIN THROMBOSIS: RISK FACTOR FOR HEPATOCELLULAR CARCINOMA?

Hepatosplenic schistosomiasis is an endemic disease prevalent in tropical countries and is associated with a high incidence of portal vein thrombosis. Inflammatory changes caused by both parasitic infection and portal thrombosis can lead to the development of chronic liver disease with potential carcinogenesis. To assess the incidence of portal vein thrombosis and hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with schistosomiasis during long-term follow-up. A retrospective study was conducted involving patients with schistosomiasis followed up at our institution between 1990 and 2021. A total of 126 patients with schistosomiasis were evaluated in the study. The mean follow-up time was 16 years (range 5-31). Of the total, 73 (57.9%) patients presented portal vein thrombosis during follow-up. Six (8.1%) of them were diagnosed with hepatocellular carcinoma, all with portal vein thrombosis diagnosed more than ten years before. The incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with schistosomiasis and chronic portal vein thrombosis highlights the importance of a systematic long-term follow-up in this group of patients.