Incidence Of Perineal Wound Complications Research Articles

Impact of peripartum antibiotics on wound complications in women with obstetric anal sphincter injury.

To evaluate the role of antibiotics on preventing wound complications following obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASI). This is a cohort study with retrospective and prospective components of women who sustained an OASI at vaginal delivery. The primary objective of this study was to assess the impact of prophylactic antibiotics at the time of delivery on perineal wound complications. Women were grouped based on peripartum antibiotic administration: no antibiotics (NABX), antibiotics for OASI wound complication prophylaxis (PABX), antibiotics for therapeutic indications (TABX), and antibiotics for any indication (AABX, PABX + TABX). Four hundred and twenty-five women with OASI were included in this analysis. Most women experienced a third-degree perineal laceration (358, 84.2%). One hundred and sixteen (27.3%) women received NABX, 195 (45.9%) women received PABX, and 114 (26.8%) women received TABX. Cefazolin was the most common antibiotic in the PABX group. Perineal wound complications occurred in 51 (12.0%) women: 14 (12.4%) in NABX, 26 (13.3%) in PABX, 11 (9.6%) in TABX, and 37 (12.0%) in AABX. The incidence of perineal wound complications did not differ between groups. In this cohort study, peripartum antibiotics did not reduce wound complication incidence following OASI. It is likely that a first-generation cephalosporin is not the ideal antibiotic in this clinical setting.

A comparison analysis of perineal wound complication after abdominoperineal extirpation (literature review)

At the moment, there is no consensus on such important issues for the practicing physician as the choice of the type of abdominoperineal resection and the optimal way to close the perineal defect. The review presents the data on the incidence of perineal wound complications after the use of various types of rectal extirpation and various types of perineal defect closure. The inconsistency of the data makes it necessary to conduct further randomized studies.

Efficacy of Pelvic Peritoneum Closure After Laparoscopic Extralevator Abdominoperineal Excision for Rectal Cancer

BackgroundThe descent of the small bowel into the pelvic dead space after extralevator abdominoperineal excision (ELAPE) presents a higher risk for postoperative complications. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy of pelvic peritoneum closure in preventing the small bowel from descending into the pelvic dead space and the potential consequences of this approach. MethodsPatients with rectal cancer undergoing laparoscopic ELAPE from March 2014 to January 2019 were retrospectively investigated. Closure of the pelvic peritoneum (CPP) was routinely performed unless it was not feasible. All patients with pelvic peritoneum reconstruction were included in the CPP group, and patients without pelvic peritoneum reconstruction were included in the no-CPP group. The main outcomes included the incidences of the small bowel descending into the retro-urogenital space (space between the bladder/uterus and the sacrum on axial CT scans), perineal wound complications, perineal hernia, and small bowel obstruction (SBO). ResultsOf the 100 patients included, 79 received CPP, and 21 did not. Fewer patients with pelvic peritoneum closure had small bowels residing in the retro-urogenital space than patients without closure (17.7% vs 42.9%, p=0.014). The incidence of SBO was also lower in the CPP group (7.6% vs. 23.8%, p=0.034). Multivariable analysis showed that no-CPP (p=0.014) was an independent risk factor for the small bowel descending into the retro-urogenital space. ConclusionCPP may prevent the small bowel from descending into the retro-urogenital dead space in patients undergoing laparoscopic ELAPE without increasing the incidence of perineal wound complications. Prospective studies are warranted to confirm the efficacy of CPP in preventing SBO and perineal hernia.

Excluding the ischiorectal fossa irradiation during neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy with intensity-modulated radiotherapy followed by abdominoperineal resection decreases perineal complications in patients with lower rectal cancer

BackgroundThe aim of this study was to explore the impact of including or excluding the ischiorectal fossa (IRF) within the clinical target volume during neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) using intensity modulated radiotherapy, in locally advanced lower rectal cancer (LALRC).MethodsWe retrospectively analysed the data of 220 LALRC patients who received NCRT followed by abdominoperineal resection between January 2009 and January 2015. Six patients were excluded because of loss to follow-up, 90 patients received IRF irradiation (IRF group) while 124 patients did not (NIRF group). Survival, patterns of recurrence, and treatment toxicities were compared between the two groups.ResultsOverall, patient/treatment variables were well balanced except for surgical technique. Perineal wound complications in the IRF and NIRF groups, were 40.0 and 24.2%, respectively (p = 0.010); corresponding 3-year perineal recurrence rates, local recurrence free survival, overall survival, and distant relapse free survival were 4.4% vs. 2.4% (p = 0.670), 88.1% vs. 95.0% (p = 0.079), 82.6% vs. 88.4% (p = 0.087), and 61.9% vs. 81.0% (p = 0.026), respectively. Multivariate analyses demonstrated the following factors to be significantly related to perineal wound complications: irradiation of the IRF (odds ratio [OR] 2.892, p = 0.002), anaemia (OR 3.776, p = 0.010), operation duration > 180 min (OR 2.486, p = 0.007), and interval between radiotherapy and surgery > 8 weeks (OR 2.400, p = 0.010).ConclusionsExclusion of the IRF from the clinical target volume during NCRT using intensity-modulated radiotherapy in LALRC could lower the incidence of perineal wound complications after abdominoperineal resection, without compromising oncological outcomes.

The results of use of myoplasty for closure of the pelvic floor defect after extralevator abdominoperineal excision of the rectum

Background. Extralevator abdominoperineal excision is associated with a high incidence of perineal wound complications. There is no uniform standard for choosing the method for pelvic floor reconstruction after extralevator abdominoperineal excision.The purpose of the study was to compare the results of extralevator abdominoperineal excisions of the rectum using various methods of perineal wound closure.Materials and Methods. Between 2014 and 2018, 120 patients underwent extralevator abdominoperineal excisions of the rectum using various options for closure of the pelvic floor. The patients were divided into 3 groups. Group I patients (n=64) underwent simple plasty of the peritoneal wound. Group II patients (n=43) underwent myoplasty using the gluteus maximus muscle. Group III patients (n=13) underwent myoplasty using the rectus abdominis muscle. The incidence of perineal wound complications in the early postoperative period was assessed.Results. The total number of perineal wound complications in Group I, II and III was 33 (51.5 %), 13 (30.2 %), and 6 (46.1 %), respectively. Grade IIIA-IIIB complications according to the Clavien-Dindo classification were observed in 25 % of Group I patients, in 18.6 % of Group II patients and in 7.7 % of Group II patients. Postoperative perineal wound complications occurred more often in Group I patients after simple plasty than in Group II and III patients after myoplasty (51.5 % versus 30.2 %). However, perineal wound complications were observed more often in Group III than in Group II (46.1 % versus 30.2 %, respectively). No significant differences in the frequency of complications between 3 groups were found.Conclusion. Using various options for closure of the pelvic floor after extralevator abdominoperineal excisions of the rectum, there was a tendency to reduction in the incidence of grade IIIA-IIIB perineal wound complications.

Perineal Wound Complications Following Extralevator Abdominoperineal Excision: Experience of a Regional Cancer Center.

Extralevator abdominoperineal excision (ELAPE) results in a large perineal defect which needs reconstruction by a flap or biological mesh. The incidence of perineal wound complications is thought to be higher following an ELAPE compared to conventional abdominoperineal excision (APE). WE aimed to analyze the perineal wound complications following ELAPE in our institution. This was a retrospective analysis of all consecutive patients who underwent an APE (conventional and ELAPE) procedure in our institution between 2012 and 2015. We retrieved the demographic data, treatment data, and pathological data from the case records. Reconstruction of the perineal defect after a prone perineal dissection was performed using a local muscle flap. The incidence of perinealwound complications, hospital stay, and time to initiate adjuvant chemotherapy was compared between the two groups. A total of 71 patients underwent APE over a period of 41months of which 21 patients underwent ELAPE. The perineal dissection during ELAPE was done in the prone position in 18 patients and in the supine position in 3 patients. Perineal wound complications were seen in 9 patients (42%) who underwent ELAPE compared to 17 patients (34%) who underwent conventional APE (p = 0.52). The mean duration of hospital stay was significantly longer in patients who underwent ELAPE when compared to those who underwent conventional APE (22.9 ± 3.6days vs 14.6 ± 1.0days, p = 0.03). The median interval between ELAPE and initiation of adjuvant chemo was 54days (range 32-120days) compared to 50days (range 30-100days) in patients undergoing conventional APE. A delay in initiating adjuvant chemotherapy of more than 12weeks was seen in 4 patients (19%) following ELAPE. The incidence of perineal wound complications following ELAPE in this study was comparable to that reported in literature. Although the hospital stay following ELAPE was significantly longer than that following conventional APE in our institution, it did not unduly prolong initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy. Improving the perineal reconstruction techniques and selecting patients who will benefit from ELAPE may help to reduce the wound complications.

PWE-403 Impact of the lorec programme on low rectal cancer surgery in a uk hospital

<h3>Introduction</h3> The higher rates of rectal perforation and positive resection margins (CRM) associated with abdominoperineal excision of the rectum (AP), compared with low anterior resection (LAR), are believed to explain the higher rates of local recurrence seen with AP. This has led to renewed emphasis on cylindrical excision of the anorectum with the levator muscles en-bloc, and in the UK the Low Rectal Cancer development programme (LOREC) has been established to improve decision making and surgical technique. Our Trust was among the first to participate in LOREC early in 2011 and from that point just 2 surgeons performed prone extralevator AP (ELAPE). This paper reports our first four years’ ELAPE experience and compares outcomes with our previous audit and international results. <h3>Method</h3> Patients with adenocarcinoma &lt;2 cm above the anorectal junction or with tumour breaching the levators on MRI are considered unsuitable for sphincter saving surgery and so undergo ELAPE. Where there is doubt, examination under anaesthetic is used to determine whether LAR can be performed. Patients with threatened CRM have long course chemoradiotherapy (LCRT) and reconstruction with a rectus abdominus flap; others have Permacol reconstruction. ELAPE is also used for residual or recurrent squamous cell carcinoma after chemoradiotherapy. Demographics, surgical and histological details were collected from our prospective database with retrospective review of radiology and correspondence to identify complications and recurrence. The primary outcome was intraoperative tumour perforation or CRM &lt;1 mm. Secondary outcomes were pelvic recurrence within 2 years and perineal complications. <h3>Results</h3> 2003–2009 9 surgeons performed AP for 95 patients with 12% positive CRM or intraoperative rectal perforation and 14% local recurrence. Since February 2011 48 patients have undergone ELAPE (32M:16F), median age 66 years (range 37–88) with median follow-up 23 months (3–46 months). 28 patients had LCRT. One patient had a perforated tumour preoperatively and 2 had CRM &lt;1 mm with no intraoperative rectal perforations (total 6%). There were no deaths within 30 days of surgery, 1 death within 90 days. Of the 26 patients with &gt;24 months follow up there has been 1 local recurrence (4%), none in the patients with shorter follow up. 12% had prolonged perineal wound healing, 4% had perineal hernia. <h3>Conclusion</h3> Our results demonstrate safe adoption of the modified technique with good outcomes, compared to previously published local recurrence rates of 10–30%. Closing the perineal wound either with VRAM flap in post neoadjuvant patients, or Permacol mesh repair, gives a low incidence of perineal wound complications. LOREC has enabled safe rapid spread of the ELAPE technique with an improvement in outcomes. <h3>Disclosure of interest</h3> None Declared.

Perineal reconstruction using pedicled vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap (VRAM).

The perineal wound is a major source of morbidity after abdominoperineal resection (APR) for rectal cancer, particularly after preoperative irradiation. Myocutaneous flap reconstruction is a viable alternative to primary perineal wound repair providing well-vascularized non-irradiated tissue to fill the dead space, and improve wound healing. Sixty patients with low rectal cancer receiving neoadjuvant radiotherapy were prospectively randomized to either primary perineal wound closure (Group B) or VRAM perineal reconstruction (Group A). The study was carried out in the surgical department, National Cancer Institute (NCI), Cairo University over a period of 4 years from August 2008 to July 2012. All patients were evaluated as regards incidence of perineal wound complications, abdominal wall complications, and added co-morbidity. Perineal wound complications were observed in 5 patients in group A (17.2%) and in 14 patients in group B (46.4%) (P = 0.015). There was no significant difference in the incidence of abdominal wound morbidity between both groups. Operative blood loss and time were lower in group B. The vertical rectus myocutaneous flap (VRAM) is a relatively simple and reliable technique for perineal wound reconstruction after abdominoperineal resection.

Interdisziplinäre, primäre Rekonstruktion des Perineums zur Vermeidung von Wundkomplikationen nach abdominoperinealer Rektumexstirpation

Multimodal treatment options for ultra-low neoplasms of the rectum or anal cancer include chemotherapy, radical abdominoperineal resection and/or radiation. Primary wound closure increases the risk of perineal wound complications that require secondary revision. Perineal wound complications may trigger delay of adjacent tumor therapy and thus have an impact on rate of local recurrence and long-term survival for rectal cancer. Simultaneous primary reconstruction of the perineal defect has been shown to reduce the incidence of perineal wound complications as well as hospital stay which enables timely adjacent therapy and may improve prognosis. This study was designed to retrospectively evaluate wound complications after abdominoperineal resection by comparing a group with and one without primary perineal reconstruction. Between 2005 and 2011, patients were analysed and divided into cohorts 1 and 2. Cohort 1 included n = 33 patients without primary perineal reconstruction. Cohort 2 included n = 4 patients with primary perineal reconstruction. Risk factors were identified for increased wound complications and delay of adjacent therapy. Subgroup analysis revealed that 18 out of 33 patients of cohort 1 had wound complications. In five cases, prolonged wound healing resulted in a delay of adjacent therapies. Four patients suffered from progression of tumour, 2 out of these 4 patients had a history of delayed adjacent therapy. The main risk factor for prolonged wound healing due to postoperative complications was a history of neoadjuvant treatment resulting in a rate of 64.7 %. Cohort 2 undergoing primary reconstruction presented without wound complications or delay in adjuvant therapy. A primary perineal reconstruction after APRE can reduce the rate of perineal wound complications. Furthermore, neoadjuvant treatment was shown to carry a major risk for wound complications. Patients after radio-/chemotherapy should undergo a primary reconstruction to prevent procedure-related perioperative morbidity. Subsequently, delays in adjuvant therapy, and prolonged hospital stay can be inhibited. Moreover, quality of life can be increased. The interdisciplinary approach aims at identifying high-risk patients for perineal wound complications who may benefit from primary reconstruction in order to reduce rate of wound complications with potential impact on rate of local recurrence. All these measures contribute to an optimized surgical standard.

Outcomes of Immediate Vertical Rectus Abdominis Myocutaneous Flap Reconstruction for Irradiated Abdominoperineal Resection Defects

Perineal wound complications after chemoradiotherapy and abdominoperineal resection (APR) for anorectal cancer occur in up to 60% of patients, including perineal abscess and wound dehiscence. Vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneous (VRAM) flaps have been used in an attempt to reduce these complications by obliterating the noncollapsible dead space with vascularized tissue and closing the perineal skin defect with nonirradiated flap skin. Many surgeons are reluctant to use VRAM flaps unless primary closure is not possible. All patients who underwent chemoradiotherapy and APR during a 12-year period at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center were retrospectively reviewed. Patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics and surgical complications and outcomes were compared between patients who underwent VRAM flap reconstruction of wounds that could have been closed primarily (flap group, n = 35) and those who had primary closure of the perineal wound (control group, n = 76). Overall, there were no significant differences in the incidence of perineal wound complications between the groups; the flap group had a significantly lower incidence of perineal abscess (9% versus 37%, p = 0.002), major perineal wound dehiscence (9% versus 30%, p = 0.014), and drainage procedures required for perineal/pelvic fluid collections (3% versus 25%, p = 0.003) than the control group had. Despite flap harvest and the need for donor site closure in the flap group, there was no significant difference in abdominal wall complications between groups during the study's mean patient followup of 3.8 years. VRAM flap reconstruction of irradiated APR defects reduces major perineal wound complications without increasing early abdominal wall complications. Strong consideration should be given to immediate VRAM flap reconstruction after chemoradiation and APR.

Perineal wound complications after abdominoperineal resection.

Perineal wound complications following abdominoperineal resection (APR) is a common occurrence. Risk factors such as operative technique, preoperative radiation therapy, and indication for surgery (i.e., rectal cancer, anal cancer, or inflammatory bowel disease [IBD]) are strong predictors of these complications. Patient risk factors include diabetes, obesity, and smoking. Intraoperative perineal wound management has evolved from open wound packing to primary closure with closed suctioned transabdominal pelvic drains. Wide excision is used to gain local control in cancer patients, and coupled with the increased use of pelvic radiation therapy, we have experienced increased challenges with primary closure of the perineal wound. Tissue transfer techniques such as omental pedicle flaps, and vertical rectus abdominis and gracilis muscle or myocutaneous flaps are being used to reconstruct large perineal defects and decrease the incidence of perineal wound complications. Wound failure is frequently managed by wet to dry dressing changes, but can result in prolonged hospital stay, hospital readmission, home nursing wound care needs, and the expenditure of significant medical costs. Adjuvant therapies to conservative wound care have been suggested, but evidence is still lacking. The use of the vacuum-assisted closure device has shown promise in chronic soft tissue wounds; however, experience is lacking, and is likely due to the difficulty in application techniques.

Rectus Flap Reconstruction Decreases Perineal Wound Complications After Pelvic Chemoradiation and Surgery: A Cohort Study

A major source of morbidity after abdominoperineal resection (APR) after external beam pelvic radiation is perineal wound complications, seen in up to 66% of cases. Our purpose was to determine the effect of rectus abdominus myocutaneous (RAM) flap reconstruction on perineal wound morbidity in this population. The study group consisted of 19 patients with anorectal cancer treated with external beam pelvic radiation followed by APR and RAM flap reconstruction of the perineum. A prospectively collected database was queried to identify a control group (n = 59) with anorectal cancer treated with similar radiation doses that subsequently underwent an APR without a RAM flap during the same time period. Comparison of percentages was performed with a two-sided Fisher's exact test, and comparison of means was performed with Wilcoxon's test. Perineal wound complications occurred in 3 (15.8%) of the RAM flap patients and 26 (44.1%) of the control patients (P = .03). The incidence of other complications was not different between groups (42.1% vs. 42.4%; P = .8). Despite an increased number of anal squamous tumors, an increased vaginectomy rate, increased use of intraoperative radiotherapy, and an increased proportion of cases with recurrent disease, the flap group had a significantly lower rate of perineal wound complications relative to the control group. Perineal closure with a RAM flap significantly decreases the incidence of perineal wound complications in patients undergoing external beam pelvic radiation and APR for anorectal neoplasia. Because other complications are not increased, RAM flap closure of the perineal wound should be strongly considered in this patient population.