Incidence Of Leukopenia Research Articles

Disparities in Access to Valganciclovir Cytomegalovirus Prophylaxis in High-Risk African American Kidney Transplant Patients.

While access and outcomes disparities for African American (AA) kidney transplant recipients are documented, there are limited studies assessing medication access disparities in transplantation. Cytomegalovirus (CMV) causes severe complications for transplant recipients, and we aimed to understand differences in access to CMV prophylaxis valganciclovir and its impact on CMV infection rates in AA transplant recipients. This single-center, retrospective longitudinal cohort study examined high-risk (CMV serostatus D+/R-) adult kidney transplant recipients between June 1, 2010, and May 31, 202, through EMR abstraction. Standard univariate comparative statistics were employed alongside binary logistic regression for multivariable modeling. During the 10 year period,418 kidney transplant recipients were included, with 179 (42.8%) identified as AA and 239 as non-AA. There were significant differences in mean age (p = 0.001) and private versus Medicaid insurance status (p < 0.001). AAs experienced higher death-censored graft loss rates (10.6% AA vs. 5.0% non-AA, p = 0.031). CMV infection rate, opportunistic infection rate, leukopenia incidence, and death did not differ significantly between AA and non-AA patients. AA patients were 42% less likely to receive valganciclovir out-of-pocket cost assistance compared to non-AA patients (OR 0.58, [0.379-0.892], p = 0.013). When incorporating age, Medicaid status, and donor marginality in a multivariable model, the impact of AA race on utilizing assistance programs became statistically non-significant (OR 0.70, [0.448-1.094], p = 0.118). AAs were significantly less likely to leverage assistance programs or utilize personal resources to access valganciclovir. This disparity was partially explained by age, insurance status, and donor type. Despite this, CMV infection rates were similar between AA and non-AA cohorts.

Amphotericin B Colloidal Dispersion is Efficacious and Safe for the Management of Talaromycosis in HIV-Infected Patients: Results of a Retrospective Cohort Study in China.

Amphotericin B deoxycholate (AmB-D) have potential toxic effects in the treatment of talaromycosis, and high-quality, non-generic liposomal AmB (L-AMB) is still inaccessible in many regions of China. As such, the efficacy and safety of alternative drugs warrant further investigation for the management of talaromycosis. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of Amphotericin B Colloidal Dispersion (ABCD) and AmB-D for the treatment of talaromycosis in a retrospective cohort of HIV-infected patients. This was a retrospective study and the data of HIV-infected patients with talaromycosis who received ABCD or AmB-D from January 2018 to December 2022, were retrospectively collected and analyzed. We compared the efficacy and safety of the two antifungal drugs. Overall, 38 patients receiving ABCD and 33 patients receiving AmB-D were included. The conversion rates to fungal negativity at one week post-treatment were 86.84% (33/38) in the ABCD group and 90.09% (30/33) in the AmB-D group, which reached 100.00% in both groups at two weeks post-treatment. A higher symptom remission rate was observed at two weeks in the ABCD group compared with the AmB-D group (94.74% vs 75.76%; p=0.003). Additionally, the serum creatinine level significantly increased from baseline in the AmB-D group, whereas it did not increase significantly in the ABCD group. Furthermore, significantly fewer patients discontinued antifungal treatment due to drug intolerance in the ABCD group, and the incidences of leukopenia and elevated creatinine levels were lower in the ABCD group compared with the AmB-D group. ABCD has a clinical efficacy comparable to AmB-D, with higher symptom remission rate, lower nephrotoxicity, and lower bone marrow suppression, indicating that ABCD may be an appropriate alternative option for the clinical management of talaromycosis.

Recent efficacy and long-term survival of Astragalus polysaccharide combined with gemcitabine and S-1 in pancreatic cancer.

Pancreatic cancer is a highly malignant tumor with a rapid progression rate and a high susceptibility to infiltration and metastasis. Astragalus polysaccharide (APS), a pure Chinese medicine preparation primarily made from the traditional Chinese herb Astragalus, plays a positive role in the treatment of many malignant tumors. To explore the recent efficacy of APS combined with gemcitabine plus tegafur gimeracil oteracil potassium capsule (S-1) (GS) regimen in the treatment of pancreatic cancer and assess its effect on the immune function and long-term survival of patients. A total of 97 patients who were diagnosed with pancreatic cancer and received GS chemotherapy at The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University (Zhejiang Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine) from March 2021 to December 2021 were included in the retrospective analysis. Among them, 41 patients received APS combined with GS chemotherapy, and 56 patients received GS chemotherapy only. The recent efficacy, immune function, adverse reactions, and long-term survival were compared among these patients. After 4 cycles of treatment, the objective response rate of patients receiving the combined therapy of APS and GS was 51.22%, and the disease control rate (DCR) was 56.10%, higher than those of patients receiving the monotherapy with GS alone (30.36% and 35.71%, respectively). Besides, the percentages of CD3+ T cells (50.18% ± 9.57%) and CD4+ T cells (31.52% ± 5.33%) in the peripheral blood of patients receiving the combined therapy of APS and GS were higher compared with those treated with GS regimen alone [(44.06% ± 8.55%) and (26.01% ± 7.83%), respectively]. Additionally, the incidences of leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, and fatigue in patients receiving the combined therapy of APS and GS were significantly lower than those in patients receiving the monotherapy of GS alone (17.07%, 9.76%, 31.71% vs 37.50%, 28.57%, 60.71%). Moreover, the median survival time of patients receiving the combined therapy of APS and GS was 394 days, significantly longer than that of patients receiving the monotherapy of GS alone (339 days) (hazard ratio: 0.66; 95%CI: 0.45-0.99; P = 0.036). All these differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05). The combined therapy of APS and GS improved the recent efficacy and long-term survival of patients with pancreatic cancer and alleviated chemotherapy-induced immune suppression and adverse reactions.

Traditional Chinese medicine combined with chemotherapy for breast cancer after operation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

This systematic review aims to explore the effect of traditional Chinese medicine combined with chemotherapy on the clinical efficacy of breast cancer postoperative patients, providing theoretical basis for the treatment of breast cancer postoperative patients with traditional Chinese medicine. A comprehensive search was conducted on databases such as China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Database, VIP Database, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, PubMed, and the Cochrane Library from their inception to August 2023 to screen RCTs comparing the effect of traditional Chinese medicine combined with chemotherapy with that of chemotherapy alone on the clinical efficacy of breast cancer postoperative patients. The included literature was systematically reviewed. A total of 22 RCTs involving 1834 breast cancer postoperative patients were finally included, with 918 patients in the traditional Chinese medicine combined with chemotherapy group (treatment group) and 916 patients in the chemotherapy alone group (control group). Meta-analysis showed that compared with the control group, therapeutical effective rate, CD3, CD4, CD4/CD8, and adverse reactions in the treatment group were all improved, and the incidence of leukopenia and thrombocytopenia after chemotherapy were all reduced, with statistically significant differences. Traditional Chinese medicine combined with chemotherapy is superior to chemotherapy alone in improving the therapeutical effective rate after breast cancer surgery, reducing chemotherapy adverse reactions, and enhancing immune function.

Application of CAR-T cell therapy in B-cell lymphoma: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

This study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) immunotherapy with standard treatment for B-cell lymphoma, providing evidence-based support for the more efficient use of CAR-T cell immunotherapy. We conducted a comprehensive literature search of high-quality randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on CAR-T therapy for B-cell lymphoma in the following databases: Wanfang, Web of Science, CNKI, VIP database, and PubMed, up to February 2024. The outcome measures included objective remission rate (ORR), complete remission rate (CRR), and incidence of adverse reactions. Subgroup analysis was performed based on the differences in co-stimulatory domains. Meta-analysis was conducted using Review Manager 5.4 and Stata software. A total of five RCTs involving 1670 patients were included in this meta-analysis. The results showed that the CAR-T treatment group had significantly higher ORR (RR: 1.47, 95% CI 1.23-1.76, I2 = 80%, p < 0.0001), CRR (RR: 2.19, 95% CI 2.16-3.79, I2 = 93%, p = 0.005), cytokine release syndrome (CRS) incidence (RR: 34.51, 95% CI 2.27-523.78, I2 = 98%, p = 0.01), neurotoxicity (NT) incidence (RR: 6.00, 95% CI 1.82-19.75, I2 = 80%, p = 0.003), neutropenia incidence (RR: 1.39, 95% CI 1.02-1.88, I2 = 93%, p = 0.03), leukopenia incidence (RR: 1.39, 95% CI 1.04-1.87, I2 = 61%, p = 0.03), and headache incidence (RR: 1.56, 95% CI 1.25-1.95, I2 = 34%, p < 0.0001) compared to the standard treatment group. Subgroup analysis based on co-stimulatory domains revealed that the 4-1BB subgroup had higher incidences of CRR, CRS, NT and leukopenia than the CD28 subgroup; however, the CD28 subgroup exhibited higher ORR and neutropenia than the 4-1BB subgroup. CAR-T cell immunotherapy demonstrates superior efficacy compared to standard therapy in treating B-cell lymphoma. However, CAR-T treatment can lead to adverse reactions such as CRS and NT. Infusion of an appropriate dose of CAR-T cells (e.g., 100 × 106) may be a strategy to mitigate the risk of CRS and NT.

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy with S-1 versus platinum in the treatment of locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a multicenter, retrospective, propensity score-matched analysis.

Literature data are scarce on concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) with S-1 for locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LANPC) treatment. This study compared the efficacy and safety of the S-1 versus platinum-based CCRT in LANPC treatment. Methods: This study enrolled 547 patients newly diagnosed with LANPC who underwent CCRT with S-1 or platinum at three institutions. Propensity score matching in a 1:1 ratio balancing baseline features was performed. Survival and adverse effects were compared between groups. Of 160 patients in the cohort, 100 eligible were propensity score matched. Matched dataset analyses showed a higher 5-year overall survival rate (87.1% vs. 84.7%, P = 0.833), progression-free survival (79.6% vs. 75.5%, P = 0.669), locoregional recurrence-free survival (87.0% vs. 84.7%, P = 0.518), and distant metastasis-free survival (84.8% vs. 83.0%, P = 0.780) in the S-1 group than in the platinum-based CCRT group, although not statistically significant. Objective response rate (98.0% vs. 88.0%, P = 0.117) was significantly higher in the S-1 than in the platinum-based regimen, although it was not statistically reflected. Compared with platinum-based, those undergoing S-1-based chemotherapy demonstrated a higher incidence of grade 3 mucositis (20.0% vs. 2.0%, P = 0.016) in the S-1 group and a lower incidence of leukopenia (44.0% vs. 68.0%, P = 0.033), neutropenia (28.0% vs. 52.0%, P = 0.032), anemia (22.0% vs. 44.0%, P = 0.040), nephrotoxicity (4.0% vs. 20.0%, P = 0.028), and nausea/vomiting (30.0% vs. 56.0%, P = 0.019). The results suggest that S-1 can be used as a concurrent chemotherapy regimen during radiotherapy for patients with LANPC, since it presents a noninferior survival benefit compared with platinum and shows tolerable adverse effects.

Occupational exposure to arsenic and leukopenia risk: Toxicological alert.

Arsenic and its inorganic compounds affect numerous organs and systemic functions, such as the nervous and hematopoietic systems, liver, kidneys, and skin. Despite a large number of studies on arsenic toxicity, rare reports have investigated the leukopenia incidence in workers exposed to arsenic. In workplaces, the main source of workers' exposure is the contaminated air by the inorganic arsenic in mines, arsenic or copper smelter industries, and chemical factories. Erythropoiesis inhibition is one of the arsenic effects and it is related to regulatory factor GATA-1. This factor is necessary for the normal differentiation of early erythroid progenitors. JAK-STAT is an important intracellular signal transduction pathway responsible for the mediating normal functions of several cytokines related to cell proliferation and hematopoietic systems development and regulation. Arsenic inactivates JAK-STAT by inhibiting JAK tyrosine kinase and using the IFNγ pathway. The intravascular hemolysis starts after the absorption phase when arsenic binds to the globin of hemoglobin in erythrocytes and is transported into the body, which increases the oxidation of sulfhydryl groups in hemoglobin. So, this article intends to highlight the potential leukopenia risk via inhalation for workers exposed to arsenic and suggests a possible mechanism for this leukopenia through the JAK-signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) pathway inhibition.

Radiotherapy with S-1 for the treatment of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma 75 years or older

ObjectiveExplore the efficacy and safety of involved-field irradiation (IFI) combined with S-1 as definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy (dCRT) for locally advanced elderly esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), under the premise of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT).MethodsWe designed a prospective single-arm phase II study. The study enrolled 91 patients aged 75 to 92 years. Eligible participants had histologically confirmed squamous cell carcinoma, stage II to IV disease based on the 8th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC). All elderly patients (EPs) received dCRT with S-1. which was administered orally twice daily for 28 days. The radiotherapy dose was 61.2 Gy delivered in 34 fractions or 50.4 Gy delivered in 28 fractions. The primary endpoint was 2-year overall survival (OS), and the secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), local control rate (LCR), and safety.ResultsFrom July 2017 to July 2021, we enrolled EPs with ESCC who were treated at the Jiangsu Cancer hospital. As of August 1, 2023, the median follow-up of surviving EPs was 31.4 months (IQR: 25.2 to 72.6 months). 83 patients (91.2%) completed the whole course of treatment. The 2-year OS rate was 59.2%, and the PFS rate was 43.7%. The most common grade 1 to 2 adverse effects (AEs) were radiation esophagitis (79.1%), and then were radiation pneumonia (46.2%). Anemia (41.8%) was the most common of grade 1 to 2 hematologic toxicity. The incidence of grade 3 or above AEs was 24.2%, and the incidence of leukopenia was the highest (11.0%). There was not one death due to treatment-related toxicity. In a subgroup analysis of radiotherapy doses, we found no statistically significant differences in PFS (P = 0.465) and OS (P = 0.345) in EPs with ESCC who received 50.4 Gy and 61.2 Gy, and that patients in the 50.4 Gy group had lower dermatitis (P = 0.045) and anemia (P = 0.004).ConclusionsIF-IMRT combined with S-1 is a promising regimen for elderly ESCC. And the radiotherapy dose of 50.4 Gy remains the standard dose for EPs with ESCC undergoing CCRT.

Epidemiological, clinical, biochemical, and treatment characteristics of brucellosis cases in Turkey.

In our study, we aimed to evaluate the epidemiological features of brucellosis and the efficacy of different treatment options in patients with various organ involvements. Patients diagnosed with brucellosis and treated in two different centers between 2009 and 2019 were retrospectively screened and evaluated regarding epidemiological and clinical features, laboratory findings, and treatment responses. The study included 297 complete-data patients (76% of rural patients were farmers). Farming (76%) and raw dairy (69%) were the main transmission methods. Most patients (98.6%) had positive tube agglutination tests. Ninety-two patients' blood and bodily fluid cultures grew Brucella spp. The incidence of leukopenia was 18.8%, thrombocytopenia 10.7%, anemia 34.3%, and pancytopenia 4.3%. Doxycycline and rifampicin were the major treatments, with streptomycin utilized in osteoarticular patients. Pregnant women with neurobrucellosis took ceftriaxone and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. After one year, 7.1% of patients relapsed. Doxycycline + streptomycin and doxycycline + rifampicin had similar relapse rates (p = 0.799). The double- and triple-antibiotic groups had identical recurrence rates (p = 0.252). In uncomplicated brucellosis cases doxycycline + streptomycin and doxycycline + rifampicin treatments were equally effective. Again, there is no statistical difference in relapse development rates between double and triple combination treatments in uncomplicated brucellosis cases. Relapsed patients generally miss follow-ups, interrupt therapy, have osteoarticular involvement, and get short-term treatment. Patients with focused participation should be thoroughly checked at diagnosis and medicine, and treatment should be lengthy to prevent relapses.

Clinical Analysis of the Efficacy and Safety of Different Neoadjuvant Strategies in the Treatment of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer

Objective In this study, we retrospectively analysed the efficacy and safety of three treatment models, namely, short-course radiotherapy sequential XELOX chemotherapy, neoadjuvant mFOLFOX6 concurrent radiotherapy and long-course concurrent radiotherapy with total mesorectal excision (TME) after treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer with high-risk factors. Methods We collected clinical data on 177 patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (cT3-4 and/or cN+) who were treated at the Department of Abdominal Oncology of the Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Guizhou Medical University from December 2017 to December 2022. All patients were associated with 2-3 risk factors [T4b, N2, Extramural Vascular Invasion (EMVI), Mesorectal Fascia (MRF) positivity], positive lateral lymph nodes. Among them, there were 45 cases in the short course radiotherapy sequential XELOX chemotherapy group (RT + XELOX group); 64 cases in the neoadjuvant mFOLFOX6 concurrent radiotherapy group (mFOLFOX6 + CRT group); and 68 cases in the long course concurrent radiotherapy group (CRT group). The RT + XELOX group and mFOLFOX6 + CRT group completed radiotherapy and 4 cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, respectively, and then rested for 1-2 weeks before TME surgery; the CRT group completed concurrent radiotherapy and then rested for 6-8 weeks before TME surgery.Adjuvant chemotherapy was conducted after surgery in each of the three groups: 2 cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy with XELOX regimen in the RT + XELOX group, 4-6 cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy with mFOLFOX6 in the mFOLFOX6 + CRT group, and 8-12 cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy with mFOLFOX6 in the CRT group.The pathological complete response rate (pCR rate), tumour downstage rate, tumour complete resection rate (R0 resection rate), local recurrence rate, distant metastasis rate, overall survival rate, incidence of adverse reactions, surgical complications and completion rate of perioperative systemic chemotherapy were compared among patients in the three groups of cases after TME. Results The pCR rate (21.95% vs 17.24% vs 5.00%, p = 0.034) and and tumour downstage rate (78.05% vs 68.97% vs 53.33%, p = 0.029) were higher in the RT + XELOX group and mFOLFOX6 + CRT group compared to the CRT group. The RT + XELOX group had a lower 3-year distant metastasis rate (14.63% vs 36.67%, p = 0.048) and improved 3-year overall survival (76.57% vs 48.56%, p < 0.001) compared to the CRT group. There was no significant reduction in the 3-year distant metastasis rate in the mFOLFOX6 + CRT group versus the CRT group (27.59% vs 36.67%, p = 0.719), and the 3-year overall survival was similar (51.23% vs 48.56%, p = 0.35). Multi-logistic regression analysis and stratified analysis showed that patients in the RT + XELOX group and mFOLFOX6 + CRT group were more likely to achieve pCR than the CRT group (RT + XELOX group: OR 7.3, 95% CI [2.6-20.8], p < 0.001; mFOLFOX6 + CRT group OR 2.9, 95% CI [1.1-7.9], p = 0.036). The completion rates of perioperative systemic chemotherapy in the RT + XELOX, mFOLFOX6 + CRT, and CRT groups were 82.93% vs. 84.48% vs. 61.67% (χ2=9.95, p = 0.007), respectively. And there were significant differences in grade 3-4 leukopenia and thrombocytopenia (incidence of leukopenia: 15.50% vs. 7.81% vs. 1.47%, p = 0.045; incidence of thrombocytopenia: 13.33% vs 7.81% vs 1.47%, p = 0.027). There was no significant difference in the incidence of intraoperative and postoperative complications among the three groups (p > 0.05). Conclusions RT + XELOX group and mFOLFOX6 + CRT group significantly improved the near-term outcome (e.g., pCR rate) in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer with high-risk factors compared with CRT group. The RT + XELOX group also reduced the 3-year distant metastasis rate, increased the 3-year overall survival rate, and did not increase the incidence of perioperative surgical complications. It provides an effective means for the comprehensive treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer and has important clinical guidance and application value.

Use of letermovir for cytomegalovirus primary prophylaxis in lung transplant recipients.

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is a driver of negative outcomes after lung transplant (LTX) and primary prophylaxis (PPX) with valganciclovir (VGC) is standard-of-care. VGC is associated with myelosuppression, prompting interest in letermovir (LTV). Adults receiving LTX between April 1, 2015, and July 30, 2022, at our institution were evaluated. Patients were excluded if low CMV risk (D-/R-), survived <90 days post-LTX, or transferred care before PPX withdrawal. Primary outcomes were leukopenia (white blood cell count [WBC] ≤ 3.0×109/L), severe leukopenia (WBC ≤ 2.0×109/L), and neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count ≤ 1500 cells/µL) requiring granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (GCSF) on PPX. Secondary outcomes included breakthrough CMV infection and post-PPX CMV infection. 204 patients met inclusion criteria: 175 patients on VGC and 29 patients on LTV (after VGC conversion). Most patients received bilateral LTX (62.7%) with non-lymphocyte-depleting induction (96.6%) and moderate-risk serostatus (D+/R+, 48.5%). Patients transitioned from VGC to LTV after a mean of 178 days (SD 80.8 days) post-transplant. Patients on VGC experienced significantly more leukopenia (82.3%vs. 58.6%, p = 0.008), severe leukopenia (57.1%vs. 31.0%, p = 0.016), and neutropenia requiring GCSF (70.9%vs. 51.7%, p = 0.048). Breakthrough (5.7%vs. 3.4%, p = 0.955) and post-PPX (24.6%vs. 37.9%, p = 0.199) infections were similar. A subgroup analysis of patients with high-risk serostatus showed similar trends, though did not reach statistical significance. In this single-center study, the incidence of leukopenia and neutropenia requiring GCSF were reduced with LTV compared to VGC. Breakthrough and post-PPX infections were not significantly different. This evidence suggests that LTV has comparable efficacy with reduced myelosuppression compared to VGC in LTX recipients, and may be an appropriate alternative for PPX.

Impact of chrono-radiotherapy on the prognosis and treatment-related toxicity in patients with locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A multicenter propensity-matched study

ABSTRACT The timing of radiotherapy (RT) delivery has been reported to affect both cancer survival and treatment toxicity. However, the association among the timing of RT delivery, survival, and toxicity in locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LA-NPC) has not been investigated. We retrospectively reviewed patients diagnosed with LA-NPC who received definitive RT at multiple institutions. The median RT delivery daytime was categorized as morning (DAY) and night (NIGHT). Seasonal variations were classified into the darker half of the year (WINTER) and brighter half (SUMMER) according to the sunshine duration. Cohorts were balanced according to baseline characteristics using propensity score matching (PSM). Survival and toxicity outcomes were evaluated using Cox regression models. A total of 355 patients were included, with 194/161 in DAY/NIGHT and 187/168 in WINTER/SUMMER groups. RT delivered during the daytime prolonged the 5-year overall survival (OS) (90.6% vs. 80.0%, p = 0.009). However, the significance of the trend was lost after PSM (p = 0.068). After PSM analysis, the DAY cohort derived a greater benefit in 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) (85.6% vs. 73.4%, p = 0.021) and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) (89.2% vs. 80.8%, p = 0.051) in comparison with the NIGHT subgroup. Moreover, multivariate analysis showed that daytime RT was an independent prognostic factor for OS, PFS, and DMFS. Furthermore, daytime RT delivery was associated with an increase in the incidence of leukopenia and radiation dermatitis. RT delivery in SUMMER influenced only the OS significantly (before PSM: p = 0.051; after PSM: p = 0.034). There was no association between toxicity and the timing of RT delivery by season. In LA-NPC, the daytime of radical RT served as an independent prognostic factor. Furthermore, RT administered in the morning resulted in more severe toxic side effects than that at night, which needs to be confirmed in a future study.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors combined with concurrent chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) combined with concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) versus CCRT alone in patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. This retrospective cohort study included patients diagnosed with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma who received either CCRT alone or CCRT combined with ICIs from April 2019 to February 2023. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary endpoint was overall survival (OS). A total of 101 patients were enrolled, with 58 undergoing CCRT alone and 43 receiving CCRT+ICI. The CCRT+ICI group demonstrated a higher complete response rate compared to the CCRT alone group (11.6% vs. 1.7%, P = 0.037). However, no significant difference was observed in 1-year PFS (58.9% vs. 55.2%; hazard ratio [HR] = 1.26, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.70-2.26; P = 0.445) or 1-year OS (70.8% vs. 75.9%; HR = 1.21, 95% CI: 0.58-2.53; P = 0.613) between CCRT+ICI and CCRT alone groups. The CCRT alone group experienced a higher incidence of leukopenia of any grade (93.1% vs. 76.7%, P = 0.039) but a lower incidence of pneumonitis of any grade (36.2% vs. 65.1%, P = 0.008). CCRT+ICI may not lead to improved survival outcomes compared to CCRT alone in patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. These findings indicate the need for further investigation into this treatment approach.

Chinese Medicine Combined with Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Improving Myelosuppression in Colorectal Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

To assess the effectiveness of Chinese herbal medicine (CHM) combined with adjuvant chemotherapy on myelosuppression for colorectal cancer (CRC) patients using network meta-analysis (NMA). Literature searches in both international (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library) and Chinese (China Science and Technology Journal Database, Wanfang Data, China National Knowledge Infrastructure) databases for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were conducted from inception until October 10, 2022. We included RCTs of patients who received CHM combined with chemotherapy, including FOLFOX, XELOX, FOLFIRI, and other relevant regimens in the CHM treatment group. The outcomes included the incidence of myelosuppression, leukopenia, hemoglobin reduction, and thrombocytopenia. Two reviewers independently screened the databases, extracted the data, and assessed the risk of bias and credibility of evidence. RevMan 5.4.1 software and STATA 14.0 were used to perform the NMA. A total of 31 RCTs were included, published from 2008 to 2021 in Chinese. Among these, 2,314 participants comparing the following 9 CHMs were identified: Shengbai Recipe (SBR), Bazhen Decoction (BZD), Jianpi Jiedu Recipe (JJR), Jianpi Recipe (JR), Compound Cantharis Capsule (CCC), Zaofan Pill (ZFP), Guilu Erxian Gel (GL), Buzhong Tiaogan Decoction (BZ), and Qiamagu Capsule (QM). The results of NMA found an indirect comparison. Based on the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA), the ZFP+ chemotherapy group had the lowest incidence of myelosuppression, with an odds ratio (OR) of 0.08 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.01, 0.76], whereas the GL+ chemotherapy group had the lowest incidence of leukopenia, hemoglobin reduction, and thrombocytopenia, with an OR of 5.25 (95% CI: 2.41, 11.43), 4.66 (95% CI: 2.23, 9.72), and 0.27 (95% CI: 0.13, 0.54), respectively. Moreover, BZD + chemotherapy could alleviate leukopenia, hemoglobin reduction, and thrombocytopenia (P<0.01). Pairwise comparison showed that there was no difference in the efficacy among the 8 CHMs+ chemotherapy group. The comparison and adjustment funnel plot indicated that small-study effect had no impact on these outcomes. This NMA provided evidence to support that patients with CRC benefit from receiving different combination of CHM chemotherapies. Among these, GL plus chemotherapy and BZD plus chemotherapy were the more effective for myelosuppression in patients; however, as the qualtiy of evidence is insufficient, further research is needed. (PROSPERO, No. CRD42022369025).

The role of Shenqi Fuzheng injection as adjuvant therapy for breast cancer: an overview of systematic reviews and meta-analyses

BackgroundBreast cancer (BC) is the most frequent malignancy in the world. Chemotherapy (CT) is a common treatment for BC but is accompanied by toxicity and side effects. Shenqi Fuzheng Injection (SFI) is an adjuvant therapy with promising results in improving efficacy and reducing toxicity in clinical studies. This overview of systematic reviews and meta-analysis (SRs/MAs) aimed to summarize the benefits and evaluate the quality of evidence supporting SFI adjuvant as CT for BC.MethodsA systematic search for SRs/MAs of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on SFI treatment for BC was performed by searching PubMed, Web of Science, EMbase, Cochrane Library, CNKI, Wanfang, VIP, and SinoMed databases from inception to October 1, 2022. The quality of SRs/MAs was evaluated using AMSTAR-2, PRISMA 2020, ROBIS, and GRADE by two reviewers. The corrected covered area (CCA) was used to quantify the degree of duplication of the original SRs/MAs. Finally, quantitative analysis of RCTs was conducted using RevMan 5.4 software. This study was registered with PROSPERO, CRD42022377290.ResultsSix SRs/MAs including 61 RCTs with 5593 patients were included in this study. Studies were published between 2015 and 2019, the original RCTs ranged from 7–49, with sample sizes ranging from 336–1989. The quantitative meta-analysis found that adjuvant CT of SFI improved the clinical response rate (RR=1.37, 95% CI=1.28, 1.46; P<0.00001) and the KPS score (RR=1.66, 95% CI 1.54, 1.79, P<0.00001) of patients with BC. In terms of immune function, CD3+ (SMD=1.51, 95% CI 0.91, 2.10; P<0.00001), CD4+ (SMD=1.87, 95% CI 1.18, 2.56; P<0.00001), CD4+/CD8+ (SMD=0.86, 95% CI 0.48, 1.23; P<0.00001), and NK cell levels (SMD=0.94, 95% CI 0.63, 1.24; P<0.00001) in the adjuvant CT group SFI were better than those with CT alone. Adverse reactions following SFI adjuvant CT showed reduced incidence of leukopenia (RR=0.53, 95% CI 0.46, 0.62; P<0.00001) and gastrointestinal reactions (RR=0.48, 95% CI 0.39, 0.58; P<0.00001). However, the GRADE results showed ‘very low’ to ‘moderate’ evidence for the 42 outcomes, without high-quality evidence supporting them, limited mainly by deficiencies in the design of RCTs (42/42, 100.00%), inconsistency (19/42, 45.24%), publication bias (41/42, 97.62%), and inaccuracy (3/42, 7.14%). The unsatisfactory results of AMSTAR-2, PRISMA 2020, and ROBIS were limited to lack of registration of study protocols, explanation of inclusion basis of RCTs, description of funding sources for the included studies, incomplete search strategy and screening process, addressing heterogeneity and sensitivity, and reporting potential conflicts of interest.ConclusionAdjuvant CT with SFI for BC had better benefits and a lower risk of adverse events. The methodology and quality of the evidence are generally low, highlighting a need of greater attention during study implementation. More objective and high-quality studies are needed to verify the efficacy of adjuvant CT with SFI in clinical decision-making for BC.

Chronomodulated chemotherapy for locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A phase II randomized controlled trial

ObjectiveTo validate the safety and efficacy of chronochemotherapy for locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). MethodsParticipants for this phase II randomized controlled trial were recruited from the Department of Head and Neck Oncology at the Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Guizhou Medical University. Patients enrolled (128 in total, 112 in the final analysis) between April 1, 2017, and February 28, 2018, were randomly divided into the chronochemotherapy and conventional chemotherapy groups. In the chronochemotherapy group, docetaxel was intravenously administered between 3:30 a.m. and 4:30 a.m. on day 1, followed by intravenous administration of cisplatin between 10:00 a.m. and 10:00 p.m. from day 1to day 5. In addition, 5-fluorouracil was administered through a continuous intravenous pump between 10:00 p.m. and 10:00 a.m. (2nd day) from day 1 to day 5. In the conventional chemotherapy group, docetaxel (on day 1), cisplatin (on day 2), and 5-fluorouracil (from day 1 to day 5, 120 ​h in total) were administered without time-specific constraints. Both groups underwent intensity-modulated radiation therapy with 6-MV X-rays. The gross target volume (GTV) comprised the nasopharyngeal GTV and cervical lymph node GTV. The primary endpoint was immune function, quantified by measuring dendritic cell and lymphocyte subsets, whereas the secondary endpoints were therapeutic efficacy and incidence of adverse events. Pearson Chi-square test was applied to compare total events between the groups, Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare the DC subsets and toxicities, and Wilcoxon signed-rank test ​was used to compare the continuous variables between the two groups. ResultsChronochemotherapy preserved immune function, as evidenced by elevated levels of myeloid dendritic cells (P ​= ​0.394) and higher CD4/CD8 ratio (P ​= ​0.781). No significant difference in overall response rate, measured as the sum of complete and partial response rates, was observed between the groups (P ​= ​0.711). A reduction in the incidence of vomiting (P ​= ​0.002), stomatitis (P ​= ​0.028), and mucositis (P ​= ​0.028) was observed in the chronochemotherapy group. Leukopenia incidence rate was 83.3 ​% and 92.3 ​% in the chronochemotherapy and conventional chemotherapy groups, respectively (P ​= ​0.232). ConclusionsIn patients with locoregionally advanced NPC, the overall response rate of chronochemotherapy is comparable to that of conventional chemotherapy; however, chronochemotherapy shows fewer adverse events.

Effects of Yipi Huayu decoction on tumor markers, immune function, and adverse reactions during chemotherapy in gastric cancer patients: a retrospective propensity score-matched study.

To analyze the effects of Yianpi Huayu Decoction on tumor markers, immune function and adverse reactions during chemotherapy in patients with gastric cancer. The clinical data of 154 patients with progressive gastric cancer who attended Baoji Maternal and Child Health Hospital (Daijiawan Branch) from January 2020 to March 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into an observation group (61 cases) and a control group (93 cases) according to the treatment method and were matched using propensity score matching (PSM). The control group was given SOX neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimen (oxaliplatin + tiglio), and the observation group was given spleen-strengthening and blood-stasis-reducing tonics as adjuvant treatment on the basis of the treatment given to the control group. Clinical efficacy in the two groups was observed, as well as Carbohydrate Antigen 19-9 (CA19-9), Carbohydrate Antigen 72-4 (CA72-4), and Carcinoembryonic Antigen (CEA) levels, immune function (IgA, IgM, and IgG), Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS), and occurrence of adverse reactions. After matching, there was no significant difference in the total clinical efficiency between the two groups (P > 0.05). After matching, there were no differences in CA19-9, CA72-4, and CEA levels between the observation group and the control group before or after treatment (P > 0.05). After matching, the IgA, IgM, and IgG levels in the observation group were significantly better than those in the control group after treatment (P < 0.05). The incidence of leukopenia (P = 0.011) and diarrhea (P = 0.011) during treatment was higher in the control group than in the observation group after matching. The KPS score of the observation group was higher than that of the control group after matching (P < 0.05). After matching, Cox regression analysis found that the treatment regimen (P < 0.001, HR = 2.527), TNM staging (P = 0.001, HR = 0.471), local recurrence (P = 0.001, HR = 2.147), and pretreatment CEA (P = 0.011, HR = 1.131) were independent prognostic factors affecting patients' 2-year survival. While the spleen-enhancing and blood-stasis-removing herbal formula combined with the SOX chemotherapy regimen did not improve therapeutic outcomes in gastric cancer patients, it did enhance immune function, reduce adverse reactions, and improve quality of life.

The efficiency of liposomal paclitaxel versus docetaxel in neoadjuvant chemotherapy with the TPF regimen for locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a retrospective study.

This retrospective study aimed to explore the efficiency and untoward reaction of liposomal paclitaxel versus docetaxel for locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). This retrospective study included 115 patients diagnosed with NPC at our hospital between January 2018 and December 2021. Patients were stratified into two groups based on their treatment with either liposomal paclitaxel (n = 71) or docetaxel (n = 44) as part of the neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimen. Objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), locoregional relapse-free survival (LRFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and overall survival (OS) were compared between the two groups. ORR was significantly improved in the liposomal paclitaxel group than in the docetaxel group (62.0% versus 40.9%, p = 0.028). The 3-year PFS (PFS: 84.4% versus 77.5%, p = 0.303), LRFS (95.8% versus 94.4%, p = 0.810), DMFS (87.2% versus 83.0%, p = 0.443), and OS (90.7% versus 88.8%, p = 0.306) revealed no significance. The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio [hazard ratio (HR): 3.510; p = 0.039] and distant metastasis (HR: 4.384; p = 0.035) were regarded as the risk factors using multivariate regression analysis. Moreover, the incidence of leukopenia at grades 1-2 in the liposomal paclitaxel group was significantly lower than that in the docetaxel group (28.1% versus 79.5%, p < 0.05). Liposomal paclitaxel had better efficacy in terms of short-term effects and lower incidence of leukopenia at grades 1-2 compared with the docetaxel group.

Efficacy and safety of camrelizumab-based comprehensive treatment for non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Many studies show that camrelizumab combination therapy can significantly improve progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the time of camrelizumab to market is short, and there is no systematic evaluation of camrelizumab-based comprehensive treatment of NSCLC. To systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of camrelizumab in comprehensively treating NSCLC. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane, were searched by computer before August 2023 based on Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines, and reports on the efficacy and safety of camrelizumab-based treatment for NSCLC were collected, and RevMan 5.4 software was employed for meta-analysis finally. Totally, 5 RCTs, 2 cohort studies, and 12 single-arm studies were included. The meta-analysis results revealed that, compared with the treatment without camrelizumab, the camrelizumab-based combination treatment considerably extended the OS (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.60, 95% confidence interval (CI): (0.44-0.82), p < 0.01), PFS (HR = 0.42, 95% CI: (0.28-0.63), p < 0.01), and event-free survival (EFS) (HR = 0.55, 95% CI: (0.44-0.68), p < 0.01). The median objective response rate in single-arm studies was 41% (95% CI: 28%-53%), and the disease control rate was 84% (95% CI: 78%-89%). Furthermore, in terms of the occurrence of grades 3-5 adverse events, the incidence of neutropenia was lower in the camrelizumab combination group than in the control group, while the incidence of leukopenia and rash was higher than in the combination group, and no significant difference was revealed in the incidence of other adverse events. Among single-arm studies, the incidence of grades 3-5 adverse events did not exceed 10%. Treatment combined with camrelizumab can effectively prolong OS, PFS, and EFS in NSCLC patients with good safety, camrelizumab combined with chemotherapy is an effective treatment option for NSCLC patients.

Lower leukocytes pretreatment as a possible risk factor for therapy-induced leukopenia in interferon-beta-treated patients with multiple sclerosis.

Interferon-beta (IFN-β) still plays a fundamental role in immunomodulation of people with multiple sclerosis (MS) with low disease activity and in clinically isolated syndrome (CIS). In 2014, pegylated (PEG) interferon was licensed by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) for relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS), enabling a lower dosing frequency. Our retrospective study compares laboratory findings and adverse events between subcutaneous (sc.) PEG-IFN-β-1a and IFN-β-1a in RRMS and CIS patients. Patients with CIS or RRMS fulfilling the revised McDonald criteria from 2017 visiting the neurology department of the University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz from 2010 to 2019 and treated with sc. PEG-IFN-β-1a or sc. IFN-β-1a (n = 202) were screened for eligibility. Patients who underwent regular laboratory controls in-house were included in our analysis (n = 128). We evaluate disease progression through clinical examination, relapse history, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) disease activity (gadolinium-enhancing or new T2 lesions). Relevant laboratory findings such as leukopenia (leukocyte count < 3.5/nl) and neutropenia (neutrophil count <43% of lymphocytes or <1500/µl) were assessed. Telephone interviews evaluated the side effects of the respective medication. A subgroup of patients was analyzed regarding neutrophil quantities and qualities. Patients treated with sc. PEG-IFN-β-1a had significantly lower leukocyte counts (p = 0.046) and higher incidences of leukopenia (p = 0.006) and neutropenia (p = 0.03) compared to sc. IFN-β-1a. Clinical and MRI disease activity showed no significant differences, but people treated with sc. PEG-IFN-β-1a reported more common adverse events such as joint/muscle pain, injection-site reaction, and infections. No serious adverse events were reported. Treatment with sc. PEG-IFN-β-1a compared to unpegylated sc. IFN-β resulted in a significantly greater reduction in leukocyte and neutrophil levels with a higher incidence of side effects. We suggest mandatory monitoring of differential blood counts before and during treatment.