Incidence Of Intraocular Inflammation Research Articles

Long-term efficacy and safety of brolucizumab in neovascular age-related macular degeneration: A multicentre retrospective real-world study.

To investigate the long-term efficacy and safety of intravitreal brolucizumab (BRZ) injections in patients with typical neovascular age-related macular degeneration (typical nAMD) and polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV). This multicentre retrospective study included 401 eyes of 398 patients with nAMD who received BRZ injection(s), with a follow-up duration of ≥12 months. Changes in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), retinal fluid evaluation and central subfield thickness (CST) on optical coherence tomography were assessed. The efficacy of BRZ was compared between typical nAMD and PCV groups. Analyses were conducted with 280 eyes of 278 patients with typical nAMD and 121 eyes of 120 patients with PCV (mean age, 71.1 ± 8.6 years). 29 eyes (7.2%) were treatment naïve. The mean follow-up period was 15.3 ± 2.8 months; the mean number of BRZ injections within 1 year was 4.5 ± 1.7. BCVA was maintained during the follow-up period, and CST significantly improved from the first injection month and was maintained for 12 months in both the typical nAMD and PCV groups. The dry macula proportion increased from 2.7% at baseline to 56.1% at 1 month and 42.9% at 12 months. Among the 18 eyes that underwent indocyanine green angiography both before and after treatment, 10 (55.6%) showed polyp regression. Overall, the incidence of intraocular inflammation (IOI), retinal vasculitis and occlusive retinal vasculitis was 9.4% (38 eyes), 1.2% (5 eyes)and 0.5% (2 eyes), respectively. IOI occurred from the first to the sixth injections, with an average IOI onset of 28.5 ± 1.4 days. All eyes achieved IOI resolution, although the two eyes with occlusive retinal vasculitis showed a severe visual decline after IOI resolution. Brolucizumab was effective in maintaining BCVA and managing fluid in eyes with nAMD for up to 1 year, exhibiting a high polyp regression rate. However, the not uncommon incidence of IOI and the severe visual decline caused by the rare occlusive retinal vasculitis following BRZ treatment underscore the importance of careful monitoring and timely management.

Brolucizumab in recalcitrant neovascular age-related macular degeneration-real-world data in Chinese population.

This retrospective study aimed to determine the short-term efficacy and safety of brolucizumab treatment for recalcitrant neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) in a real-world setting in Taiwan. Recalcitrant nAMD patients who were treated with brolucizumab from November 2021 to August 2022 at Taipei Veterans General Hospital were included. Patients were followed for 3 months after switching to brolucizumab. The primary outcomes were changes in mean best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central retinal thickness (CRT) from baseline to the third month. The secondary outcomes included the incidence of intraocular inflammation (IOI), proportion of patients with subretinal and intraretinal fluid (SRF and IRF), and change in pigment epithelial detachment (PED) height from baseline to the third month. The significance level was considered as p < .05 in all tests. A total of 38 patients (40 eyes) with a mean (±SD) age of 76.3 (±10.84) years were included. The baseline BCVA was 0.92±0.64 logMAR, and the CRT and PED height were 329.0±171.18 and 189.8±114.94 um, respectively. The patients had a significant reduction in CRT and resolution of IRF and SRF from baseline to the third month. There were numerical improvements in mean BCVA and PED height, but they were not significant. The percentages of achieving at least 0.1, 0.2, and 0.3 logMAR (equivalent to 5, 10, 15 ETDRS letters) visual gain were 50%, 37.5%, and 30%, respectively, during the first 3 months of follow-up. No IOI occurred in these patients. This study demonstrated that brolucizumab had good short-term structural and functional efficacy in recalcitrant nAMD patients.

Baseline characteristics associated with the incidence of intraocular inflammation after the intravitreous injection of brolucizumab.

To investigate baseline characteristics associated with the incidence of intraocular inflammation (IOI) after the intravitreal injection of brolucizumab (IVBr) for the treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). This retrospective study included 66 eyes of 62 consecutive patients with nAMD who received IVBr (18 eyes were treatment naïve and 48 eyes had switched from other anti-vascular endothelial growth factor [VEGF] therapy). Baseline clinical characteristics were compared in non-IOI and IOI groups. Although a dry macula was achieved at a high rate even 6 months after IVBr, IOI occurred in 8 of 66 eyes (12.1%; all had switched therapy) during the study period. Baseline characteristics including age, sex, nAMD type, lens status, visual acuity, central macular thickness, and a history of diabetes did not differ between the groups. The number of previous anti-VEGF injections before IVBr was greater in the IOI group (P = 0.004), and the ratio of patients with a laser flare-cell photometry (LFCP) value over 15 photon count per millisecond (pc/ms) was higher in the IOI group (P = 0.017). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that a greater number of previous anti-VEGF injections (odds ratio [OR]: 1.12,P = 0.006; area under the curve: 0.82, cut-off score: 14.0) and an LFCP value over 15 pc/ms (OR: 81.6,P = 0.031) were significantly associated with the incidence of IOI after IVBr. A number of previous anti-VEGF injections greater than 14 and an LFCP value more than 15 pc/ms might be useful predictors of the incidence of IOI after IVBr in eyes with nAMD.

Efficacy and Safety of Brolucizumab for Diabetic Macular Edema

Despite the effectiveness of existing anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapies, a need remains for further treatment options to improve response rates and/or reduce injection or monitoring frequency in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME). To evaluate the efficacy and safety of brolucizumab vs aflibercept dosed every 4 weeks in participants with DME. This 52-week, double-masked, phase 3 randomized clinical trial included treatment-naive adults and adults who had previously received anti-VEGF therapy. Data were collected from September 2019 to March 2020, and data were analyzed from April 2020 to February 2021. Brolucizumab, 6 mg, intravitreal injection every 4 weeks or aflibercept, 2 mg, intravitreal injection every 4 weeks. Participants were randomized 2:1 to brolucizumab, 6 mg, or aflibercept, 2 mg. The primary end point was change from baseline in best-corrected visual acuity at week 52. Secondary end points were the proportion of participants with a 2-step improvement or greater from baseline in Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale score, the proportion of eyes with absence of both subretinal fluid and intraretinal fluid, change from baseline in central subfield thickness, and safety at week 52. A total of 517 participants were randomized to brolucizumab (n = 346) or aflibercept (n = 171); 299 (57.8%) were male, and the mean (SD) age was 60.7 (10.2) years. Brolucizumab was noninferior to aflibercept in best-corrected visual acuity (Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letter score) change from baseline at week 52 (brolucizumab, 12.2-letter improvement; aflibercept, 11.0-letter improvement; difference, 1.1; 95% CI, -0.6 to 2.9; noninferiority margin, 4; P < .001). Brolucizumab was superior to aflibercept for the proportion of eyes without subretinal and intraretinal fluid (brolucizumab, 144 of 346 [41.6%]; aflibercept, 38 of 171 [22.2%]; difference, 20.0%; 95% CI, 12.5to 28.6; P < .001) and mean central subfield thickness change from baseline at week 52 (brolucizumab, -237.8 μm; aflibercept, -196.5 μm; difference, -41.4; 95% CI, -58.9 to -23.8; P < .001). Incidence of intraocular inflammation was 4.0% (14 of 346) in the brolucizumab arm and 2.9% (5 of 171) in the aflibercept arm, incidence of retinal vasculitis was 0.9% (3 of 346) and 0.6% (1 of 171), respectively, and incidence of retinal vascular occlusion was 0.3% (1 of 346) and 0.6% (1 of 171). One participant in the brolucizumab arm had retinal artery occlusion. In these study participants with DME, no clinically meaningful differences in visual outcomes were noted between the brolucizumab and aflibercept arms; some superior anatomic improvements were noted in the brolucizumab arm. No new safety concerns were identified. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03917472.

Опыт клинического применения и оценка безопасности препарата бролуцизумаб у пациентов с неоваскулярной формой возрастной макулярной дегенерации

Aim. To evaluate the efficiency and safety of intravitreal administration of brolucizumab in real clinical practice in the treatment of patients with neovascular form of age-related macular degeneration. Methods. The study included 89 patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration, mean age 69.5±7.8 years, including 36 % men and 64 % women: group 1 – 17 patients who had not previously received anti VEGF therapy; group 2 – 72 patients with disease activity on the background of previous anti-VEGF therapy. Best corrected visual acuity was determined and the parameters of optical coherence tomography, biomicroscopic and ophthalmoscopic studies were evaluated. Results. Mean follow-up period was 51±3.4 weeks. The incidence of intraocular inflammation during brolucizumab therapy among patients who had not previously received anti-VEGF therapy was 0 %, against the background of previous anti-VEGF therapy – 1.4 %. Conclusions. Lower percentage of intraocular inflammation cases may be associated with careful selection of patients using exclusion criteria, assessment of the condition of the anterior and posterior segment of the eye. Key words: age-related macular degeneration; anti VEGF therapy; brolucizumab; intraocular inflammation.

Efficacy, Safety, and Durability of Brolucizumab: An 8-Month Post-Marketing Surveillance Analysis.

Brolucizumab (Beovu®) is an anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agent approved for the treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nvAMD). Brolucizumab was marketed for its noninferiority to aflibercept and its potential for greater durability. However, post-marketing utilization has been tempered by safety concerns. We evaluate the visual and anatomic efficacy of brolucizumab, examine changes in treatment intervals after switching to brolucizumab, and estimate the incidence of drug-related adverse events in the real world. This was a retrospective consecutive case series of 626 eyes (543 patients) with nvAMD treated with 1438 brolucizumab injections at a single retina practice between 10/1/2019 and 5/15/2020. Changes in visual acuity (VA); anatomic outcomes assessed by optical coherence tomography (OCT) including central subfield thickness (CST), macular volume (MV), presence of intraretinal fluid (IRF), subretinal fluid (SRF), and serous pigment epithelial detachment (sPED) on foveal line scans; treatment intervals before and after receiving brolucizumab; and the incidence of brolucizumab-related adverse events. The majority of eyes (N = 531, 89.7%) had received prior anti-VEGF therapy with aflibercept, ranibizumab, and/or bevacizumab. VA improved in treatment-naïve eyes (+3.7 letters, p = 0.04), and was maintained in previously treated eyes. There were significant improvements in all anatomic outcomes in both groups (p < 0.001). We observed a 4.8% incidence of intraocular inflammation (IOI) and a 0.6% incidence of retinal vasculitis. The average treatment interval increased from 6.3 to 6.8 weeks (p = 0.001). Brolucizumab treatment was associated with VA improvement in naïve eyes and maintenance of VA in previously treated eyes. Switching to brolucizumab was associated with improved anatomic outcomes and extended treatment intervals in most eyes. We observed a similar incidence of IOI and a lower incidence of retinal vasculitis compared to the Safety Review Committee's analysis of HAWK and HARRIER.

Exudative retinal detachment following intravitreal brolucizumab injection.

To report an unusual case of a patient who presented with intraocular inflammation and an exudative retinal detachment following first brolucizumab injection, and to compare this case to the existing literature. The patient's chart was thoroughly reviewed, and notes were made on visual acuities and ocular examination findings at each relevant visit. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) and ultra-wide fluorescein angiography (UWFA) images were taken across multiple timepoints. An 80-year-old female being treated for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) presented 11 days after her first intravitreal injection of brolucizumab with intraocular inflammation and an exudative retinal detachment. She was treated with systemic steroids. The patient's intraocular inflammation and exudative retinal detachment resolved three weeks after brolucizumab injection. In the literature, the incidence of intraocular inflammation (IOI) has been reported to be higher with brolucizumab versus aflibercept, but most of these cases were considered to be mild to moderate in severity. More recently, reports of severe IOI and retinal vasculitis associated with brolucizumab have been published in post-marketing surveillance articles. To our knowledge, this is the first report of exudative retinal detachment after intravitreal brolucizumab injection. As our experience with this new drug continues to grow, reports of these events are critical to increase our understanding, so that future management strategies can be developed to improve patient outcomes.

Short-Term Safety and Efficacy of Intravitreal Brolucizumab Injections for Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration: A Multicenter Retrospective Real-World Study

Introduction: The aim of the study was to determine the short-term real-world safety and efficacy of intravitreal brolucizumab injections in Korean patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). Methods: This multicenter retrospective study involved 294 eyes (treatment naïve 20 eye [6.8%] and nontreatment naïve 274 eyes [93.2%]) of 290 patients from 13 hospitals or retinal centers in South Korea. Patients with nAMD who received brolucizumab injection(s) between April 1 and November 30, 2021, with a follow-up ≥1 month, were included. Primary outcomes were safety, incidence of intraocular inflammation (IOI), and potential risk factors. The secondary outcome was efficacy, i.e., change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and optical coherence tomography-measured macular thickness and retinal fluid. Results: The mean age was 71.63 ± 8.66. The follow-up period was 2.38 ± 0.79 months. The mean number of brolucizumab injections during the follow-up was 1.52 ± 0.58. The overall incidence of IOI was 13.9% (n = 41 eyes). Most IOI cases were of anterior uveitis (8.8%, 26 eyes), followed by retinal vasculitis (2.4%, seven eyes) and occlusive retinal vasculitis (0.3%, one eye). Most eyes showed IOI resolution (n = 40, 97.5%) and BCVA restoration (n = 39, 95.1%) with or without corticosteroid treatment during the follow-up. Age, sex, IOI history, or other anti-vascular endothelial growth factor injection histories were not associated with the occurrence of IOI. However, only thin subfoveal choroidal thickness (SFCT) was associated with the occurrence of IOI (odds ratio = 0.995, p = 0.020). BCVA at 1 month improved from baseline (baseline 0.518 ± 0.356 vs. 1 month 0.503 ± 0.383, p = 0.023), but the improvement was not maintained. Anatomical improvement was significant after 3 months. Conclusion: In Korean patients with nAMD, the incidence of IOI following brolucizumab injections was 13.9%. IOI was well-controlled with or without steroid treatment. Most IOI eyes (95.1%) were restored to the level of vision before. IOI occurrence and occlusive vasculitis was rare. In the short term, brolucizumab injection effectively improved vision at 1 month and dried retinal fluid for 3 months.

Randomized trial of bilateral gene therapy injection for m.11778G > A MT-ND4 Leber optic neuropathy.

Leber hereditary optic neuropathy (LHON) is an important example of mitochondrial blindness with the m.11778G > A mutation in the MT-ND4 gene being the most common disease-causing mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) variant worldwide. The REFLECT phase 3 pivotal study is a randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled trial investigating the efficacy and safety of bilateral intravitreal injection of lenadogene nolparvovec in patients with a confirmed m.11778G > A mutation, using a recombinant adeno-associated virus vector 2, serotype 2 (rAAV2/2-ND4). The first-affected eye received gene therapy; the fellow (affected/not-yet-affected) eye was randomly injected with gene therapy or placebo. The primary endpoint was the difference in change from baseline of best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in second-affected/not-yet-affected eyes treated with lenadogene nolparvovec versus placebo at 1.5 years post-treatment, expressed in logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution (LogMAR). Forty-eight patients were treated bilaterally and 50 unilaterally. At 1.5 years, the change from baseline in BCVA was not statistically different between second-affected/not-yet-affected eyes receiving lenadogene nolparvovec and placebo (primary endpoint). A statistically significant improvement in BCVA was reported from baseline to 1.5 years in lenadogene nolparvovec-treated eyes: -0.23 LogMAR for the first-affected eyes of bilaterally treated patients (p < 0.01); and -0.15 LogMAR for second-affected/not-yet-affected eyes of bilaterally treated patients and the first-affected eyes of unilaterally treated patients (p < 0.05). The mean improvement in BCVA from nadir to 1.5 years was -0.38 (0.052) LogMAR and -0.33 (0.052) LogMAR in first-affected and second-affected/not-yet-affected eyes treated with lenadogene nolparvovec, respectively (bilateral treatment group). A mean improvement of -0.33 (0.051) LogMAR and -0.26 (0.051) LogMAR was observed in first-affected lenadogene nolparvovec-treated eyes and second-affected/not-yet-affected placebo-treated eyes, respectively (unilateral treatment group). The proportion of patients with one or both eyes on-chart at 1.5 years was 85.4% and 72.0% for bilaterally and unilaterally treated patients, respectively. The gene therapy was well tolerated, with no systemic issues. Intraocular inflammation, which was mostly mild and well controlled with topical corticosteroids, occurred in 70.7% of lenadogene nolparvovec-treated eyes versus 10.2% of placebo-treated eyes. Among eyes treated with lenadogene nolparvovec, there was no difference in the incidence of intraocular inflammation between bilaterally and unilaterally treated patients. Overall, the REFLECT trial demonstrated an improvement of BCVA in LHON eyes carrying the m.11778G > A mtDNA mutation treated with lenadogene nolparvovec or placebo to a degree not reported in natural history studies and supports an improved benefit/risk profile for bilateral injections of lenadogene nolparvovec relative to unilateral injections.

RISK OF INTRAOCULAR INFLAMMATION AFTER INJECTION OF ANTIVASCULAR ENDOTHELIAL GROWTH FACTOR AGENTS: A Meta-analysis.

This meta-analysis investigates the incidence of intraocular inflammation (IOI) after intravitreal antivascular endothelial growth factor injections in neovascular age-related macular degeneration. A systematic search was performed on Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Central from January 2005 to April 2021. Randomized controlled trials comparing IOI after intravitreal bevacizumab, ranibizumab, brolucizumab, or aflibercept in neovascular age-related macular degeneration were included. Primary outcomes were sight-threatening IOI, final best-corrected visual acuity, and change in best-corrected visual acuity from baseline. Secondary outcomes included the incidence of other IOI events. Meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model. Overall, 11,460 unique studies were screened, of which 14 randomized controlled trials and 6,759 eyes at baseline were included. There was no difference between agents for the risk of endophthalmitis and retinal vascular occlusion. Compared with aflibercept, brolucizumab had a higher incidence of generalized IOI (risk ratio = 6.24, 95% confidence interval = [1.40-27.90]) and vitreous haze/floaters (risk ratio = 1.64, 95% confidence interval = [1.00-2.67]). There were no significant differences between comparators for other secondary end points. There was no difference in the risk of severe sight-threatening IOI outcomes between intravitreal antivascular endothelial growth factor agents. There was a significantly higher risk of generalized IOI after brolucizumab relative to aflibercept. Our results alongside other recent safety findings suggest the need for further investigation in the risk-benefit profile of brolucizumab for the treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration.

Early Canadian Real-World Experience with Brolucizumab in Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor-Experienced Patients with Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration: A Retrospective Chart Review.

PurposeTo assess early real-world outcomes with brolucizumab in Canadian patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) for which they previously received ≥1 anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agent(s).Patients and MethodsThis multisite, real-world, retrospective chart review included data from a consecutive sample of 73 patients who received brolucizumab for nAMD after treatment with ≥1 other anti-VEGF agents. The principal reasons for switching to brolucizumab were to extend the treatment interval (51.6% of patients) and to treat persistent macular fluid (34.2%). The primary outcomes were best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and the incidence rates of intraocular inflammation (IOI), retinal vasculitis (RV), and retinal vascular occlusion (RVO). Secondary outcomes included central retinal thickness (CRT), injection interval, and presence of intraretinal and subretinal fluid (IRF and SRF). All parameters were measured at baseline until the last treatment visit between April 27, 2020, and August 31, 2021.ResultsOver a mean follow-up of 28 weeks, a nonsignificant mean improvement in BCVA was identified (4.3 [standard deviation (SD) 8.3] letters; P=0.057), with 47.9% experiencing a gain of ≥5 letters. IOI was detected in 3 patients (4.1%), one of whom also developed RV and RVO (1.4%), which is consistent with existing brolucizumab data. Significant reductions were observed in mean CRT (−36.6 μm [SD 56.1 μm]; P=0.0002) and presence of any macular fluid (56.1% [SD 5.6%]; P<0.001), IRF (66.6% [SD 6.3%]; P<0.001), and SRF (62.7% [SD 6.3%]; P<0.001). The mean injection interval increased significantly by 2.1 weeks (SD 2.7; P<0.001).ConclusionIn the first real-world Canadian analysis, brolucizumab was associated with improvements in functional outcomes in treatment-experienced patients, consistent with other real-world studies. The incidence of IOI, RV, and RVO were in line with the post hoc safety analysis of HAWK and HARRIER data.

Intravitreal Aflibercept versus Brolucizumab for Treatment-Naive Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration with Type 1 Macular Neovascularization: Comparison of Short-Term Outcomes

Introduction: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of loading-phase treatment with intravitreal aflibercept (IVA) or brolucizumab (IVBr) for treatment-naïve neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) associated with type 1 macular neovascularization (MNV). Methods: We retrospectively studied 108 consecutive eyes undergoing IVA and 103 consecutive eyes administered IVBr. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central macular thickness (CMT), central choroidal thickness (CCT), dry macula achievement, polypoidal lesion regression, and development of intraocular inflammation (IOI) were all assessed. Results: During the loading-phase treatment, IOI was detected in 18 eyes (17.5%) in the IVBr but none of those in the IVA group (p < 0.01). The loading-phase treatment was completed in 101 eyes in the IVA and 85 eyes in the IVBr group. In those cases, BCVA improved significantly, and CMT and CCT showed significant reductions after the loading-phase treatment in both groups (all p < 0.01). The CCT reduction was significantly greater with IVBr than with IVA (32 ± 28 μm vs. 40 ± 25 μm, p < 0.01). The dry macula achievement rate was significantly higher in the IVBr than in the IVA group (71.3 vs. 85.9%, p < 0.05). We observed complete regression of polypoidal lesions significantly more frequently with IVBr than with IVA (47.5 vs. 77.3%, p < 0.01). Discussion/Conclusion: Loading-phase treatment with IVA or IVBr for treatment-naïve nAMD with type 1 MNV effectively improved BCVA and diminished exudative changes. The CCT reduction, dry macula achievement, and polypoidal lesion regression rates were all significantly greater in the IVBr than in the IVA group. The incidence of IOI was significantly higher with IVBr than with IVA.

MERLIN: Phase 3a, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Masked Trial of Brolucizumab in Participants with Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration and Persistent Retinal Fluid

To assess the 52-week efficacy and safety of brolucizumab 6 mg administered every 4 weeks compared with aflibercept 2 mg dosed every 4 weeks in eyes with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) and persistent retinal fluid. Multicenter, randomized, double-masked phase 3a study. Participants with recalcitrant nAMD (persistent residual retinal fluid despite previous frequent anti-vascular endothelial growth factor treatment). Eyes were randomized (2:1) to intravitreal brolucizumab 6 mg or aflibercept 2 mg every 4 weeks up to and including week100. The primary end point was analysis of noninferiority in mean best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) change from baseline to week 52 (margin, 4 letters). Other key end points included change in central subfield thickness (CST) from baseline to week 52, fluid-free status (no intraretinal fluid and no subretinal fluid), and safety. At week 52, brolucizumab was noninferior to aflibercept in BCVA change from baseline (least squares mean difference, -0.6 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letters; 95% confidence interval [CI], -2.1 to 0.9; P < 0.001). A total of 4.8% and 1.7% of participants reported a 15-letter or more BCVA loss from baseline at week 52 in the brolucizumab and aflibercept groups, respectively. In eyes treated with brolucizumab compared with those treated with aflibercept, the CST was reduced significantly (P < 0.001), and a significantly greater proportion of eyes were fluid free at week 52 (40.4% brolucizumab vs. 19.0% aflibercept; 95% CI, 13.9-29.0; P < 0.001). Incidence of intraocular inflammation (IOI), including retinal vasculitis and retinal vascular occlusion, were 9.3% (0.8% and 2.0%) for brolucizumab versus 4.5% (0% and 0%) for aflibercept, respectively. Visual acuity outcomes in previously treated participants with nAMD and persistent retinal fluid receiving brolucizumab 6 mg dosed every 4 weeks were noninferior to aflibercept 2 mg dosed every 4 weeks, with superior anatomic outcomes. However, incidences of IOI, including retinal vasculitis and retinal vascular occlusion, also were higher, leading to study termination.

Safety Outcomes of Brolucizumab in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration

Limited data exist on the real-world safety outcomes of patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration treated with brolucizumab (Beovu). To determine the real-world incidence of intraocular inflammation (IOI), including retinal vasculitis (RV) and/or retinal vascular occlusion (RO), for patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration who underwent brolucizumab treatment. Additionally, potential risk factors associated with these adverse events were evaluated. This cohort study included patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration in the Intelligent Research in Sight (IRIS) Registry and Komodo Healthcare Map. Patients initiating and receiving 1 or more brolucizumab injections from October 8, 2019, to June 5, 2020, with up to 6 months of follow-up were included. Brolucizumab injections. Incidence of IOI (including RV) and/or RO and RV and/or RO and risk stratification for the identified risk factors. Of 10 654 and 11 161 included eyes (from the IRIS Registry and Komodo Health database, respectively), the median follow-up times were 97 and 95 days. Most eyes switched from another anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agent (9686 of 10 654 [90.9%] and 10 487 of 11 161 [94.0%], respectively), most commonly aflibercept (7160 of 9686 [73.9%] and 7156 of 10 487 [68.2%]), and most were from women (6105 of 10 654 [57.3%] and 6452 of 11 161 [57.8%]). The overall incidence of IOI and/or RO was 2.4% (255 of 10 654 eyes) and 2.4% (268 of 11 161 eyes) for the IRIS and Komodo groups, respectively, and RV and/or RO, 0.6% (59 of 10 654 eyes and 63 of 11 161 eyes), respectively. Patients with a history of IOI and/or RO in the 12 months before brolucizumab initiation had an increased observed risk rate (8.7% [95% CI, 6.0%-11.4%] and 10.6% [95% CI, 7.5%-13.7%]) for an IOI and/or RO event in the 6 months following the first brolucizumab treatment compared with patients without prior IOI and/or RO (2.0% in both data sets). There was an increased estimated incidence rate in women (2.9% [95% CI, 2.5%-3.3%] and 3.0% [95% CI, 2.6%-3.4%]) compared with men (1.3% [95% CI, 1.0%-1.7%] and 1.4% [95% CI, 1.0%-1.7%]), but this risk was not as large as that of a prior IOI and/or RO. Similar findings were observed for patients with RV and/or RO events. The incidence rate of IOI and/or RO was approximately 2.4%. Patient eyes with IOI and/or RO in the 12 months prior to first brolucizumab injection had the highest observed risk rate for IOI and/or RO in the early months after the first brolucizumab treatment. However, given study limitations, the identified risk factors cannot be used as predictors of IOI and/or RO events, and causality with brolucizumab cannot be assessed.

Ocular adverse events following intravitreal brolucizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration at a single tertiary care center.

To determine the incidence of ocular adverse effects (AEs) following brolucizumab injection for neovascular age-related macular degeneration at a tertiary academic institution. Retrospective, single center cohort study. All patients who received an intravitreal injection of brolucizumab 6 mg for neovascular age-related macular degeneration between October 7, 2019 and July 31, 2020. Medical records of all patients who received brolucizumab 6 mg during the aforementioned time period were carefully reviewed and all ocular adverse effects after injection were charted. Incidence of post-injection ocular AEs, including intraocular inflammation (IOI), and time to development of AEs after injection. A total of 77 patients received brolucizumab 6 mg for a total of 115 administrations during the study period. There were 4 AEs (3.5%), including three cases of IOI (2.6%), one central retinal artery occlusion, and one retinal detachment. Two men and two women were affected. Ocular AEs, including those leading to severe vision loss, may develop after intravitreal brolucizumab 6 mg. A careful discussion of benefits and risks to brolucizumab should be conducted with all patients. In this first case series of ocular adverse effects after brolucizumab 6 mg injection at a single tertiary care center, the incidence of ocular adverse effects was 3.5%, including a 2.6% incidence of intraocular inflammation.

Two-Year Results of the Phase 3 Randomized Controlled Study of Abicipar in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration

To report the 2-year efficacy and safety of abicipar every 8 weeks and quarterly (after initial doses) compared with monthly ranibizumab in patients with treatment-naïve neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). Two multicenter, randomized, phase 3 clinical trials with identical protocols (CEDAR and SEQUOIA). Analyses used pooled trial data. The trials enrolled 1888 patients (1 eye/patient) with active choroidal neovascularization secondary to age-related macular degeneration and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of 24 to 73 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letters. At enrollment, patients were assigned to study eye treatment with abicipar 2 mg every 8 weeks after initial doses at baseline and weeks 4 and 8 (abicipar Q8, n= 630), abicipar 2 mg every 12 weeks after initial doses at baseline and weeks 4 and 12 (abicipar Q12, n= 628), or ranibizumab 0.5 mg every 4 weeks (ranibizumab Q4, n= 630). Efficacy measures included stable vision (<15-letter loss in BCVA from baseline) and change from baseline in BCVA and central retinal thickness (CRT). Safety measures included adverse events (AEs). For patients who completed the study, efficacy of abicipar after initial doses was maintained through week 104. At week 104, the proportion of patients with stable vision was 93.0% (396/426), 89.8% (379/422), and 94.4% (470/498); mean change in BCVA from baseline was+7.8 letters,+6.1 letters, and+8.5 letters, and mean change in CRT from baseline was-147 μm,-146 μm, and-142 μm in the abicipar Q8 (14 injections), abicipar Q12 (10 injections), and ranibizumab Q4 (25 injections) groups, respectively. The overall incidence of intraocular inflammation (IOI) AEs was 15.4%, 15.3%, and 0.3% from baseline through week 52 and 16.2%, 17.6%, and 1.3% from baseline through week 104 in the abicipar Q8, abicipar Q12, and ranibizumab Q4 groups, respectively. Two-year results show efficacy of abicipar Q8 and Q12 in nAMD. First onset of IOI events withabicipar was much reduced in the second year and comparable with ranibizumab (0.8% and 2.3% vs. 1.0%). The extended duration of effect of abicipar allows for quarterly dosing and reduced treatment burden.

Risk of Inflammation, Retinal Vasculitis, and Retinal Occlusion–Related Events with Brolucizumab: Post Hoc Review of HAWK and HARRIER

An independent Safety Review Committee (SRC), supported by Novartis Pharma AG, analyzed investigator-reported cases of intraocular inflammation (IOI), endophthalmitis, and retinal arterial occlusion in the phase 3 HAWK and HARRIER trials of brolucizumab versus aflibercept in neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). A post hoc analysis of a subset of data from two 2-year, double-masked, multicenter, active-controlled randomized phase 3 trials (NCT02307682, NCT02434328). Patients (N= 1817) with untreated, active choroidal neovascularization due to age-related macular degeneration in the study eye were randomized and treated in HAWK/HARRIER. The SRC reviewed data from cases of investigator-reported IOI (60/1088 brolucizumab-treated eyes; 8/729 aflibercept-treated eyes). The SRC received details and images (color fundus photography, fluorescein angiography, and OCT) for all investigator-determined cases of IOI, retinal arterial occlusion, and endophthalmitis. Cases were reviewed in detail by ≥2 readers, then adjudicated by the SRC as a group. Within this patient subset: incidence of IOI, signs and incidence of retinal vasculitis and/or retinal vascular occlusion, and visual acuity loss; time since first brolucizumab injection to IOI event onset; and frequency of visual acuity loss after brolucizumab injection by time of first IOI event onset. Fifty brolucizumab-treated eyes were considered to have definite/probable drug-related events within the spectrum of IOI, retinal vasculitis, and/or vascular occlusion. On the basis of these cases, incidence of definite/probable IOI was 4.6% (IOI+ vasculitis, 3.3%; IOI+ vasculitis+ occlusion, 2.1%). There were 8 cases (incidence 0.74%) of at least moderate visual acuity loss (≥15 ETDRS letters) in eyes with IOI (7 in eyes with IOI+ vasculitis+ occlusion). Of the 8 cases, 5 experienced their first IOI-related event within 3 months of the first brolucizumab injection (increasing to 7/8 within 6 months). Incidence of IOI in aflibercept-treated eyes was 1.1%, with at least moderate visual acuity loss in 0.14%. This analysis of IOI cases after brolucizumab injection identified signs of retinal vasculitis with or without retinal vascular occlusion and an associated risk of visual acuity loss. The findings will help physicians to evaluate the risks and benefits of brolucizumab treatment for nAMD.

Efficacy and Safety of Abicipar in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration: 52-Week Results of Phase 3 Randomized Controlled Study

To compare the efficacy and safety of abicipar every 8 weeks and quarterly (after initial doses) versus ranibizumab every 4 weeks in treatment-naïve patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD). Two randomized, multicenter, double-masked, parallel-group, active-controlled, phase 3 clinical trials (CEDAR, SEQUOIA) with identical protocols were conducted. Data from both trials were pooled for analysis. Patients with active choroidal neovascularization secondary to AMD and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of 24-73 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letters in the study eye were enrolled. Patients (n= 1888) were randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio to study eye treatment with abicipar 2 mg every 8 weeks after 3 initial doses at baseline and weeks 4 and 8 (Q8), abicipar 2 mg every 12 weeks after 3 initial doses at baseline and weeks 4 and 12 (Q12), or ranibizumab 0.5 mg every 4 weeks (Q4). The primary efficacy end point was proportion of patients with stable vision (defined as <15-letter loss in BCVA from baseline) in the study eye at week 52. Secondary end points included change from baseline in BCVA and central retinal thickness (CRT) at week 52. Safety measures included adverse events (AEs). The proportion of patients with stable vision at week 52 was 93.2%, 91.3%, and 95.8% in the abicipar Q8, abicipar Q12, and ranibizumab Q4 groups, respectively, with both abicipar Q8 and Q12 noninferior to ranibizumab Q4. Week 52 mean change from baseline in BCVA was 7.5, 6.4, and 8.4 letters and in CRT was-144,-145, and-144 μm in the abicipar Q8, abicipar Q12, and ranibizumab Q4 groups, respectively. Incidence of intraocular inflammation (IOI) AEs was 15.4%, 15.3%, and 0.3%, respectively. The IOI AEs were typically mild or moderate in severity and treated with topical corticosteroids; 62 of 192 patients (32.3%) received oral and/or injectable corticosteroids. Abicipar Q8 and Q12 were both noninferior to ranibizumab Q4 in the primary end point of stable vision at week 52. Intraocular inflammation was more frequent with abicipar. Quarterly and Q8 abicipar reduce nAMD disease and treatment burden compared with monthly treatment.

Intravitreal Combined Aflibercept + Anti–Platelet-Derived Growth Factor Receptor β for Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration: Results of the Phase 2 CAPELLA Trial

To compare the efficacy and safety of intravitreal aflibercept+ anti-platelet-derived growth factor receptor β (PDGFRβ) combination with intravitreal aflibercept injection (IAI) monotherapy in patients with treatment-naïve neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). Phase 2, randomized, double-masked study. A total of 505 patients (eyes) with nAMD. Patients were randomized 1:2:2 to low-dose combination intravitreal anti-PDGFRβ 1 mg and aflibercept 2 mg (LD combo), high-dose combination intravitreal anti-PDGFRβ 3 mg and aflibercept 2 mg (HD combo), or IAI alone every 4 weeks through week 12. At week 12, patients in the HD combo and IAI groups were re-randomized to continue as assigned or switch to HD combo → IAI or IAI → HD combo and dosed every 4 weeks through week 28. During weeks 28 to 52, patients received treatment as needed per prespecified criteria. This report presents efficacy through week 28 and safety through week52. Mean best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) change from baseline at week 12(primary end point). At week 12, mean BCVA gains from baseline were 5.8, 5.8, and 7.5 letters with LD combo, HD combo, and IAI, respectively (P= 0.21 for LD combo and P= 0.10 for HD combo vs. IAI). The corresponding proportions of eyes that gained ≥15 letters were 12%, 19%, and 22%, respectively. Mean reductions in central retinal thickness from baseline were 126.1, 127.1, and 126.9 μm, respectively. Proportions of eyes with complete resolution of fluid from baseline were 35%, 24%, and 42%, respectively. Vision and anatomic outcomes at week 28 were consistent with the week 12 results. Through week 52, the incidence of intraocular inflammation was 1.0%, 7.5%, 2.1%, 2.1%, and 0%, respectively. The incidence of Anti-Platelet Trialists' Collaboration-defined arterial thromboembolic events was 1.9%, 0.9%, 1.1%, 2.1%, and 1.9%, respectively. Intravitreal aflibercept+ anti-PDGFRβ did not improve BCVA over IAI alone. Anatomic outcomesevaluating complete fluid resolution favored IAI. Adverse events were consistent with the reported IAIsafety profile, except for a higher frequency of intraocular inflammation in the HD combo group.

Acute Intraocular Inflammation Caused by Endotoxin after Intravitreal Injection of Counterfeit Bevacizumab in Shanghai, China

To describe an outbreak of intraocular inflammation caused by endotoxin-contaminated counterfeit bevacizumab in China. Retrospective, observational case series. Patients undergoing intravitreal injection at a public hospital in September 2010. The medical records and microbiology results of patients who presented with intraocular inflammation after injection with intravitreal counterfeit bevacizumab were reviewed. The incidence of intraocular inflammation, results of pathogen cultures, and clinical features of inflammation. A total of 116 patients (70 men and 46 women) were injected from 3 vials of counterfeit bevacizumab. Intraocular inflammation developed in 80 patients. The estimated median incubation period was 12 hours (range, 2-24 hours), and the median duration of symptoms was 6 days (range, 3-22 days). All patients were treated initially with topical corticosteroid and antibiotics. Vitreous tap and intravitreal injection were performed on 43 patients. Twenty-one patients with hypopyon and significant vitreous inflammation underwent vitrectomy. Microscopic evaluations and microbiologic cultures of all ocular specimens were negative for bacterial and fungal contamination. The presence of endotoxin in specimens was confirmed by laboratory testing. We refer to this new clinical syndrome as "endotoxin-induced ocular toxic syndrome" (EOTS). The inflammation regressed rapidly after treatment, and 63 patients (78.8%) recovered their pre-injection vision. This study implicates endotoxin as the cause of intraocular inflammation after the intravitreal injection of counterfeit bevacizumab. The EOTS appeared clinically distinct from typical infectious endophthalmitis.