Incidence Of Intradialytic Hypotension Research Articles

#2570 Non-invasive blood pressure monitoring in dialysis patients using pulse wave velocity

Abstract Background and Aims Dialysis patients are at high risk of circulatory dysregulation and hypotension during treatment. Intradialytic hypotension (IDH) is a potentially life-threatening complication. The main causes are high ultrafiltration volumes and high ultrafiltration rates when patients tend to gain a lot of weight between dialysis treatments. A lack of patient compliance with regard to drinking volumes and a lack of residual diuresis are risk factors for this. Close circulatory monitoring and therapy settings to avoid absolute or relatively high UF rates to prevent IDH are frequently used. These are primarily the frequent non-invasive measurement of blood pressure using cuffs, the measurement of relative blood volume and the adjustment of ultrafiltration rates to these values. Prophylactically, the dialysis time can be extended, ultrafiltration profiles or ultrafiltration breaks can be planned, the dialysate temperature can be lowered and the composition of the dialysate can be adjusted. Despite all attempts, however, the incidence of IDH in everyday clinical practice is too high. The non-invasive measurements with cuffs are not carried out frequently enough, the measurement of the relative blood volume only covers a partial range, sudden changes in vascular tension or cardiac output are not recorded. Method The pulse wave velocity (PWV) is a well-known parameter for describing the propagation of the pressure wave after ejection of the heart beat volume in the arteries. The PWV is dependent on blood pressure, vessel wall tension and cardiac output. Changes in blood pressure can therefore be recognised by measuring the PWV. With the help of a measuring device (PESAS) for the ECG signal and peripheral pulse plethysmography, PWV can be measured non-invasively, continuously, for every heartbeat and, above all, hardly noticed by the patient. The PESAS allows the time-synchronised measurement of ECG and peripheral plethysmography curves and thus the determination of PWV. It is an experimental device. We would like to present a study showing the use of a measuring device (PESAS) in 15 prevalent dialysis patients for the detection of IDH. All study participants were examined during 3 dialysis treatments. Results The measurement of PWV in chronic dialysis patients during treatment is technically feasible. The measurement is tolerated by the patients. Changes in PWV could be detected in the patients during the course of dialysis; these were also dependent on the ultrafiltration rates. Individual patient reactions to volume withdrawal varied, with both increases and decreases in PWV being demonstrated. An acute change in PWV was usually associated with a drop in blood pressure. Continuous measurement allowed IDH events to be detected earlier than intermittent blood pressure measurement with cuffs. Sudden drops in blood pressure could be detected better and earlier with the PESAS system than by measuring the relative blood volume. Conclusion The PESAS system is suitable for monitoring dialysis patients to prevent IDH. Further adjustments and optimisation of the evaluation algorithms are necessary.

Association of frequent intradialytic hypotension with the clinical outcomes of patients on hemodialysis: a prospective cohort study

Intradialytic hypotension (IDH) is a common complication of hemodialysis (HD), but there is no consensus on its definition. In 2015, Flythe proposed a definition of IDH (Definition 1 in this study): nadir systolic blood pressure (SBP) <90 mmHg during hemodialysis for patients with pre-dialysis SBP <159 mmHg, and nadir SBP <100 mmHg during hemodialysis for patients with pre-dialysis SBP ≥160 mmHg. This prospective observational cohort study investigated the association of frequent IDH based on Definition 1 with clinical outcomes and compared Definition 1 with a commonly used definition (nadir SBP <90 mmHg during hemodialysis, Definition 2). The incidence of IDH was observed over a 3-month exposure assessment period. Patients with IDH events ≥30% were classified as ‘frequent IDH’; the others were ‘infrequent IDH’. All-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, and all-cause hospitalization events were followed up for 36 months. This study enrolled 163 HD patients. The incidence of IDH was 11.1% according to Definition 1 and 10.5% according to Definition 2. The Kaplan-Meier curves showed that frequent IDH patients had higher risks of all-cause mortality (p = 0.009, Definition 1; p = 0.002, Definition 2) and cardiovascular mortality (p = 0.021, Definition 1). Multivariable Cox regression analysis indicated that frequent IDH was independently associated with a higher risk of all-cause mortality (Model 1: HR = 2.553, 95%CI 1.334–4.886, p = 0.005; Model 2: HR = 2.406, 95%CI 1.253–4.621, p = 0.008). In conclusion, HD patients classified as frequent IDH are at a greater risk of all-cause mortality. This highlights the significance of acknowledging and proactively managing frequent IDH within the HD patients.

Incidence of intradialytic hypotension in heart transplant recipients with acute kidney injury treated by acetate-free hemodiafiltration

Introduction. Intradialytic hypotension (IDH) is a common complication of renal replacement therapy (RRT) sessions and may be a particularly detrimental factor in heart recipients. Objective: to investigate the incidence of IDH in heart recipients with acute kidney injury (AKI). Patients and Methods: Two groups of recipients were compared – the study group (SG), n = 313, in which 49 patients required intermittent RRT (IRRT) and in which online hemodiafiltration (OL-HDF) sessions were performed using acetate-free hydrochloric acid-based dialysate fluid; and control group (CG) n = 387, in which 88 patients required IRRT, where standard dialysate with an acetate ion content of 3 mmol/L was used for OL-HDF. Results. There was a significantly lower incidence of IDH in the SG compared to the CG: 10.46% vs 20.47% (p &lt; 0.05). Conclusions. In heart recipients for whom IDH can be considered as a significant adverse factor, the use of acetate-free dialysis fluid can significantly reduce the incidence of this complication.

Efficacy and safety of ultrafiltration combined with haemodialysis in patients with uraemia who cannot tolerate dialysis because of hypotension

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of ultrafiltration (UF) combined with haemodialysis (HD) sequential therapy in patients with intradialytic hypotension (IDH) and water retention. Methods: A total of 53 uraemia patients with IDH who could not tolerate dehydration and significant water and sodium retention (net weight gain of more than 4 kg) were randomly divided into control group (28 cases) and treatment group (25 cases). After adjusting dialysis parameters (blood pump speed and excessive filtration), HD was tried again in the control group, and UF combined with HD was given sequential treatment in the treatment group. Outcome measures included efficacy measures (duration of treatment, total water removal, weight loss, dyspnoea score and left ventricular ejection fraction) and safety measures (heart rate, blood pressure, IDH incidence, bleeding and thromboembolic events). Results: In terms of efficacy indicators, In the sequential treatment group, the duration of treatment (740 ± 168 min vs. 380 ± 94 min, p < 0.05), total water removal (5280 ± 968 mL vs. 2980 ± 765 mL, p < 0.05) and the weight loss (2756 ± 537 g vs. 1421 ± 362 g, p < 0.05) was significantly higher than that of control group. Postoperative dyspnoea score (1.92 ± 0.400 vs. 3.32 ± 0.476, p < 0.05), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF; 49.25 ± 3.76 vs. 56.46 ± 4.42, p < 0.05) was significantly improved compared with that before treatment, and the difference was statistically significant. In control group, dyspnoea score (1.89 ± 0.416 vs. 1.82 ± 0.390, p > 0.05) and left ventricular ejection fraction (49.04 ± 6.72 vs. 48.61 ± 7.12, p > 0.05) were slightly improved after treatment, but there was no statistical significance. In terms of safety indicators, patients in the control group were prone to significant blood pressure fluctuation during treatment, and the incidence of IDH was significantly higher than that in the treatment group (75% vs. 0%, p < 0.01), the difference was statistically significant, while the other safety indicators (heart rate change, bleeding and thromboembolic events) showed no statistically significant difference between the two groups. Conclusions: Compared with conventional HD, UF combined with HD can safely and effectively reduce water retention in patients with uraemia while avoiding IDH.

Comparison of therapeutic strategies for aortic stenosis between transcatheter and surgical aortic valve implantation: a retrospective cohort study in Japanese dialysis patients

BackgroundAlthough transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is assumed to be a less invasive therapy in high-risk patients with aortic valve stenosis (AS), there have been limited data suggesting its beneficial effects on cardiovascular mortality in Japanese patients receiving dialysis therapy.MethodsHemodialysis patients with severe AS underwent either TAVI (n = 33) or surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR, n = 25). We compared the postoperative outcomes and perioperative complications, including dialysis-associated parameters [e.g., intradialytic hypotension (IDH)], between TAVI and SAVR.ResultsA 30-day and 1-year mortality rate was nearly the same among the TAVI and the SAVR group. Incidence of permanent pacemaker implantation or other events, including stroke, bleeding and vascular complications, in the TAVI group were not different from those in SAVR patients during the 30-day or 1-year postoperative period. The incidence of IDH was increased following SAVR (odds ratio (OR) = 11.29 [95% CI 1.29–98.89]) but was not affected by TAVI (OR = 1.55 [95% CI 0.24–9.94]). Among the patients aged 75 or older, the incidence of IDH was particularly conspicuous in the SAVR group (OR = 15.75 [95% CI 2.30–107.93]). Because there were differences in background data (age, EuroSCORE II, and dialysis duration) between these groups, propensity score-matched analysis was conducted and showed no difference in the composite event-free probability between the TAVI and the SAVR group over one year (p = 0.816).ConclusionsTAVI offers an alternative strategy to Japanese hemodialysis patients with severe AS, with nearly the same incidence of complications as SAVR during 1-year observation.

A randomised-controlled trial (TARGET-C) of high vs. low target mean arterial pressure in patients with cirrhosis and septic shock

A high mean arterial pressure (MAP) target has been associated with improved renal outcomes in patients with cirrhosis, though it has not been studied in critically ill patients with cirrhosis and septic shock (CICs). We compared the efficacy of a high (80-85mmHg; H-MAP) vs. low (60-65; L-MAP) target MAP strategy in improving 28-day mortality in CICs. We performed open-label 1:1 randomisation of 150 CICs (H-MAP 75; L-MAP 75). The primary endpoint was 28-day mortality and secondary endpoints included reversal of shock, acute kidney injury (AKI) at day 5, the incidence of intradialytic hypotension (IDH), and adverse events. Endothelial markers were analysed in a subset of patients. The baseline characteristics were comparable. On intention-to-treat analysis, 28-day mortality (65% vs. 56%; p= 0.54), reversal of shock (47% vs. 53%; p= 0.41) and AKI development (45% vs. 31%;p= 0.06) were not different between the H-MAP and L-MAP groups, respectively. A lower incidence of IDH (12% vs. 48%; p <0.001) and higher adverse events necessitating protocol discontinuation (24% vs. 11%; p= 0.031) were noted in the H-MAP group. On per-protocol analysis (L-MAP 67; H-MAP 57), a significantly higher reversal of AKI (53% vs. 31%; p= 0.02) and a lower incidence of IDH (4% vs. 53%; p <0.001) were observed in the H-MAP group. Endothelial repair markers such as ADAMTS (2.11 ± 1.13 vs. 1.15 ± 0.48; p= 0.002) and angiopoietin-2 (74.08 ± 53.00 vs. 41.80 ± 15.95; p= 0.016) were higher in the H-MAP group. A higher MAP strategy does not confer a survival benefit in CICs, but improves tolerance to dialysis, lactate clearance and renal recovery. Higher adverse events indicate the need for better tools to evaluate target microcirculation pressures in CICs. Maintaining an appropriate organ perfusion pressure during sepsis is the ultimate goal of haemodynamic management. A higher mean arterial pressure (MAP) improves renal outcomes in patients with hepatorenal syndrome. Patients with cirrhosis and septic shock have severe circulatory disturbances, low MAP, and poor tissue perfusion. In these patients, targeting higher MAP vs. lower MAP does not confer any survival benefit but is associated with more adverse events. A higher target strategy was associated with better tolerance and lesser episodes of hypotension on dialysis. Patients who could achieve the higher target MAP, without the development of adverse events, had improved renal outcomes and better lactate clearance. Higher MAP was also associated with improvements in markers of endothelial function. A higher target MAP strategy, with close monitoring of adverse events, may be recommended for patients with cirrhosis and septic shock. NCT03145168.

Application Value of Limb Ischemic Preconditioning in Preventing Intradialytic Hypotension during Maintenance Hemodialysis

Introduction: The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of limb ischemia preconditioning (LIPC) in the treatment of intradialytic hypotension (IDH) in patients with maintenance hemodialysis (MHD). Methods: This was a single-center, prospective, and randomized controlled case study. A total of 38 patients with MHD who met the inclusion criteria from September 2021 to August 2022 were selected from the Blood Purification Center of our hospital. They were randomly divided into the LIPC group (n = 19) and the control group (n = 19). For patients in the LIPC group, the femoral artery blood flow was blocked with an LIPC instrument for 5 min (pressurized to 200 mm Hg) before each dialysis, and they were reperfused for 5 min. The cycle was repeated five times, with a total of 50 min for 12 weeks. The control group was pressurized to 20 mm Hg with an LIPC instrument, and the rest was the same as the LIPC group. The blood pressure of 0 h, 1 h, 2 h, 3 h, 4 h, and body weight before and after hemodialysis were measured in the two groups during hemodialysis, the incidence of IDH and the changes of serum troponin I (TNI) and creatine kinase isoenzyme MB (CK-MB) levels before and after the intervention were observed, and the ultrafiltration volume and ultrafiltration rate were recorded. Results: At the 8th and 12th week after intervention, the MAP in the LIPC group was higher than that in the control group (103.28 ± 12.19 mm Hg vs. 93.18 ± 11.11 mm Hg, p = 0.04; 101.81 ± 11.36 mm Hg vs. 91.81 ± 11.92 mm Hg, p = 0.047). The incidence of IDH in the LIPC group was lower than that in the control group (36.5% vs. 43.1%, p = 0.01). The incidence of clinical treatment in IDH patients in the LIPC group was lower than that in the control group (6.3% vs. 12.4%, p = 0.00). The incidence of early termination of hemodialysis in the LIPC group was lower than that in the control group (1.6% vs. 3.8%, p = 0.01). The levels of TNI and CK-MB in the LIPC group after the intervention were lower than those in the control group (322.30 ± 13.72 ng/dL vs. 438.50 ± 24.72 ng/dL, p = 0.00; 159.78 ± 8.48 U/dL vs. 207.00 ± 8.70 U/dL, p = 0.00). The changes of MAP before and after the intervention were negatively correlated with the changes of TNI and CK-MB before and after the intervention (r = −0.473, p = 0.04; r = −0.469, p = 0.04). There were no differences in dry body mass and ultrafiltration rate between the two groups before and after the LIPC intervention (p > 0.05). Multiple linear regression analysis shows that TNI is the main influencing factor of ΔMAP. No LIPC-related adverse events were found during the study period. Conclusion: LIPC can effectively reduce the incidence of IDH in patients with MHD and may be associated with the alleviation of myocardial damage.

Effect of Fludrocortisone on Intradialytic Hypotension: An Open-Label, Randomized, Crossover Study

Introduction: Intradialytic hypotension (IDH) is an important complication during chronic hemodialysis due to its adverse cardiovascular and hemodialysis outcomes. Case reports have demonstrated that administration of fludrocortisone before undergoing hemodialysis might increase intradialytic blood pressure. This study is a randomized crossover study aiming to evaluate the intradialytic hemodynamic effects of fludrocortisone. Material and Methods: A randomized, controlled two-period crossover trial was conducted at Lampang Hospital in stable chronic hemodialysis patients who experienced IDH >30% in their sessions during the past 3 months. All participants have randomly received a single dose of 0.2-mg fludrocortisone 30 min before each hemodialysis session, or had no treatment for 4 weeks. After a 2-week washout period, the participants were then switched to the other treatment for 4 weeks. The primary outcome was the mean lowest intradialytic mean arterial pressure (MAP) during the hemodialysis session. Results: A total of 17 patients were recruited with a mean age of 61.7 ± 14.8 years. By analysis of crossover design, the mean lowest intradialytic MAP was not different between receiving fludrocortisone or with no treatment (76.1 ± 12.5 vs. 73.9 ± 11.5 mm Hg, p for treatment effect = 0.331, p for period effect = 0.855, p for sequence effect = 0.870). There was no difference in the incidence of IDH between the two groups (34.4% in fludrocortisone vs. 42.7% in no treatment, p = 0.137). However, in diabetic patients and patients with residual kidney function, the incidence of IDH was significantly lower when receiving fludrocortisone (30.8 vs. 52.6%, p < 0.001, and 27.6 vs. 74.3%, p < 0.001, respectively). Conclusions: In chronic hemodialysis patients who had IDH, fludrocortisone administration did not improve intradialytic hemodynamics and did not decrease the incidence of IDH.

MO657: Low Incidence of Intradialytic Hypotension During Online Post-Dilution High-Volume Haemodiafiltration: A Randomized Cross-Over Trial between Four Intermittent Dialysis Modalities

Abstract BACKGROUND AND AIMS Compared with standard haemodialysis (S-HD), online post-dilution haemodiafiltration (HDF) is associated with improved survival, especially when high convection volumes [high-volume (HV)-HDF] are achieved [1]. A superior intradialytic haemodynamic stability may play an important role in this respect. Therefore, we assessed whether the intradialytic haemodynamic profile differs between four dialysis modalities, including S-HD and HV-HDF. METHOD In the current randomized cross-over trial (NCT03249532, ClinicalTrials.gov), 40 prevalent dialysis patients were subjected to S-HD [dialysate temperature (Td) 36.5°C], HD with cool dialysate (C-HD; Td 35.5°C), low-volume (LV)-HDF [convection volume (CV) 15 L/1.73 m2/session) and HV-HDF (CV ≥23 L/1.73 m2/session) (both Td 36.5°C). Blood pressure (BP) was measured 4x/hour. The primary endpoint was the total number of intradialytic hypotensive (IDH) episodes. IDH was defined as a nadir in systolic BP (SBP) &amp;lt;90 mmHg for a pre-dialysis SBP &amp;lt;160 mmHg and &amp;lt;100 mmHg for a pre-dialysis SBP ≥160 mmHg, independent of symptoms and interventions. In addition, an explorative analysis was performed on the incidence of early-onset IDH, which has recently been related to mortality [2]. Secondary endpoints included the intradialytic courses of SBP, diastolic BP (DBP) and mean arterial pressure (MAP). RESULTS IDH occurred significantly less frequent during C-HD (0.21 episodes/session) and HV-HDF (0.27/session) compared with S-HD (0.68/session, both P &amp;lt; .0005) (Figure 1). Furthermore, early-onset of IDH was also observed more frequently during S-HD (0.32/session) than during C-HD (0.07/session, P&amp;lt;.0005) or HV-HDF (0.10/session, P = .001) (Figure 1). After correction for multiple testing, the intradialytic courses of SBP, DBP and MAP declined only significantly during S-HD (−6.8, −5.2, −5.2 mmHg/session; P = .004, &amp;lt;.0005, .002 resp.) whereas these remained stable in the other modalities (Table 1). CONCLUSION In conclusion, during both C-HD and HV-HDF, IDH occurred least frequent and the intradialytic haemodynamic stability was best preserved. In contrast, intradialytic haemodynamic stability is most dysregulated during S-HD. Therefore, it is conceivable that the survival benefit of HV-HDF over S-HD is (at least partly) due to a more stable intradialytic haemodynamic profile and consequently less repetitive tissue injury.

Benefit of an Internet-Based Management System among Hemodialysis Patients at the Risk of Intradialytic Hypotension and Muscle Cramps: A Controlled before and after Study

Background: The purpose of this study was to observe the impact of an internet-based management system on the incidence of intradialytic hypotension (IDH) and muscle cramps in hemodialysis patients. Methods: The patients, who underwent maintenance hemodialysis in the center from January 2018 to June 2020, were recruited and divided into the pre-intervention group (before operation of the internet-based hemodialysis management system, from January 2018 to December 2018) and intervention group (after operation of the system, from June 2019 to June 2020). The clinical outcomes were compared between groups. Results: The compound endpoint of >1 IDH or muscle cramps happened in 182 patients (61.7%) in the pre-intervention group and 99 participants (30.8%) in the intervention group (relative risk [RR] = 0.50 [95% confidence interval [CI], 0.42; 0.60]). IDH occurred in 122 patients (1–5 episodes in 47 patients, 6–10 episodes in 25 patients, and >10 episodes in 50 patients) and 33 patients (30 patients had 1–5 episodes and 3 patients had 6–10 episodes) before and after execution of the internet-based management system, respectively (RR = 0.25 [95% CI, 0.18; 0.35]). The incidence of muscle cramps was significantly decreased (RR = 0.57 [95% CI, 0.45; 0.73]) after the implementation of the system, and the number of patients with 6–10 episodes dropped from 10 to 1. Multivariate analyses also showed significantly lower RRs in the intervention group: 0.29 ([95% CI, 0.20; 0.41]) for IDH and 0.58 ([95% CI, 0.45; 0.74]) for muscle cramps. Compared with the pre-intervention, participants in the intervention group had a large improvement in self-management (p < 0.001) and self-efficacy (p < 0.001). Conclusion: The study found that the internet-based hemodialysis management system was effective in reducing the IDH and muscle cramp events and improving self-management. It provided a significant implication for the development and application of internet-based programs in hemodialysis management.

Intradialytic hypotension: is timing everything?

Intradialytic hypotension (IDH) is a major complication of hemodialysis, leading to myocardial stunning, cerebral hypoperfusion, gut ischemia, loss of residual kidney function, high symptom burden, and death. This study by Keane etal. provides new data on the incidence of IDH over well-defined time intervals during the hemodialysis treatment session, clinical parameters associated with the timing of IDH onset, and whether timing of IDH impacts survival in a nationally representative hemodialysis cohort.

Frequency of Intradialytic Hypotension Events Do Not Increase with Oral Nutritional Supplementation during Hemodialysis Treatment: A Randomized Controlled Trial

This study aimed to compare the effect of the use of a renal-specific oral nutritional supplement (RS-ONS) during hemodialysis sessions and the use of RS-ONS at home on the incidence of intradialytic hypotension. A single-center, 12-week, open-label, randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted. The intervention was a RN-ONS divided into two portions: 100 and 137mL. The first portion was given after 1hour of hemodialysis (HD) treatment, while the second portion was given 45minutes before the end of HD. The research staff registered the baseline and final nutritional parameters and systolic arterial pressure (SAP) from the screen of the HD device during 36 HD sessions. Hypotension symptoms were also recorded every hour during each HD session. The nutritional and functional status was also assessed. We registered a total of 16 hypotensive events during 1082 HD sessions: 9 were in patients supplemented at home (551 HD sessions) and 7 occurred in patients supplemented during HD P=.668. Incidence of intradialytic hypotension (IH) during 1082 HD sessions was 1.4%. The total malnutrition inflammation score (MIS) decreased in both groups (P<.01), and the percentage of cachexia improved in the supplemented-during-HD group (P<.05). In this randomized controlled trial, intradialytic hypotension events did not increase with the RS-ONS during HD treatment. This strategy appears to be a safe anabolic nutritional strategy for the prevention of PEW, selecting stable patients and administering a fractioned volume of the supplement after the first hour of HD treatment. More studies with larger samples size are required to confirm these findings.

Oxygen extraction ratio to identify patients at increased risk of intradialytic hypotension

Intradialytic hypotension (IDH) is a hemodynamic phenomenon recently associated with decreased blood oxygen saturation (SO2). The ratio between peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2) and central venous SO2 (ScvO2) or Oxygen Extraction Ratio (OER), which represents a roughly estimate of the amount of oxygen claimed by peripheral tissues, might be used to estimate haemodialysis (HD) related hypoxic stress. Aim of this pilot study was to evaluate the relationship between OER increments during dialysis sessions (ΔOER) and episodes of IDH. We enrolled chronic HD patients with permanent central venous catheter (CVC) and no fistula, in whom ScvO2 measurement is at hand. OER ([(SpO2 − ScvO2)/SpO2] × 100) was measured in three consecutive HD sessions (HD OER sessions) before HD, after 15′, 30′ and 60′ min and at the end of HD. Then, a one-year follow-up was planned to record the number of IDH episodes. In the 28 enrolled patients (age 74 ± 2.6 years), during 12 ± 1.2 months of follow up, incidence of IDH was 3.6%. We divided patients into two groups, above or below the median value of ΔOER at the end of HD, which was 36%. In these groups, the average incidence of IDH was 7% and 2% respectively (p < 0.01), while OER values before HD were not different. Notably, in the high ΔOER group the OER increment was evident since after 15′ and was significantly higher than in the low ∆OER group (∆OER-15′ = 19 ± 3.0% vs. 9.0 ± 3.0%; p < 0.05). By comparison, blood volume changes overlapped in the two groups (average change − 9 ± 0.8%). Values of ∆OER > 19% after only 15′ of HD treatment or > 36% at the end of the session characterize patients with higher rates of hypotension. Intradialytic ∆OER, a parameter of tissue hypoxic stress, identifies more fragile patients at greater risk of IDH.

Impacts of dialysis adequacy and intradialytic hypotension on changes in dialysis recovery time

BackgroundDialysis recovery time (DRT) surveys capture the perceived time after HD to return to performing regular activities. Prior studies suggest the majority of HD patients report a DRT > 2 h. However, the profiles of and modifiable dialysis practices associated with changes in DRT relative to the start of dialysis are unknown. We hypothesized hemodialysis (HD) dose and rates of intradialytic hypotension (IDH) would associate with changes in DRT in the first years after initiating dialysis.MethodsWe analyzed data from adult HD patients who responded to a DRT survey ≤180 days from first date of dialysis (FDD) during 2014 to 2017. DRT survey was administered with annual KDQOL survey. DRT survey asks: “How long does it take you to be able to return to your normal activities after your dialysis treatment?” Answers are: < 0.5, 0.5-to-1, 1-to-2, 2-to-4, or > 4 h. An adjusted logistic regression model computed odds ratio for a change to a longer DRT (increase above DRT > 2 h) in reference to a change to a shorter DRT (decrease below DRT < 2 h, or from DRT > 4 h). Changes in DRT were calculated from incident (≤180 days FDD) to first prevalent (> 365-to- ≤ 545 days FDD) and second prevalent (> 730-to- ≤ 910 days FDD) years.ResultsAmong 98,616 incident HD patients (age 62.6 ± 14.4 years, 57.8% male) who responded to DRT survey, a higher spKt/V in the incident period was associated with 13.5% (OR = 0.865; 95%CI 0.801-to-0.935) lower risk of a change to a longer DRT in the first-prevalent year. A higher number of HD treatments with IDH episodes per month in the incident period was associated with a 0.8% (OR = 1.008; 95%CI 1.001-to-1.015) and 1.6% (OR = 1.016; 95%CI 1.006-to-1.027) higher probability of a change to a longer DRT in the first- and second-prevalent years, respectively. Consistently, an increased in incidence of IDH episodes/months was associated to a change to a longer DRT over time.ConclusionsIncident patients who had higher spKt/V and less sessions with IDH episodes had a lower likelihood of changing to a longer DRT in first year of HD. Dose optimization strategies with cardiac stability in fluid removal should be tested.

Incidence of Intradialytic Hypotension Throughout a Hemodialysis Session: Does the Time of Onset Matter?

Incidence of Intradialytic Hypotension Throughout a Hemodialysis Session: Does the Time of Onset Matter?

Bioimpedance Spectroscopy-Guided Ultrafiltration Normalizes Hydration and Reduces Intradialytic Adverse Events in Hemodialysis Patients.

Chronic fluid overload as well as excessive fluid removal are associated with increased morbidity and mortality in hemodialysis (HD) patients. The clinical method to probe the dry weight is often inaccurate and the bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS) is shown to improve the accuracy. We compared the impact of BIS and clinical methods to guide ultrafiltration (UF) in a randomized controlled study on the intradialytic complications and blood pressure control in prevalent HD patients. Fifty patients on maintenance HD were randomized to BIS method (BIS-group) and clinical method (CL-group) to guide UF. The body composition monitor (BCM) was done post-HD in all patients at baseline and 2-weeks interval during the study period of 6 months to determine the hydration status, but the result was revealed only to the nephrologist managing the patients in BIS-group to probe the dry weight. The endpoints of the study were blood pressure control, intradialytic complications and anti-hypertensive drug burden. The mean age was 56.0 ± 12.0 years and 70% were male. There was significant increase in patients with normal hydration in BIS-group (20% vs. 88%, p = 0.0001), but remained similar to baseline in CL-group (40% vs. 48%, p = 0.3) at 6 months. The incidence of intradialytic hypotension was significantly reduced in BIS-group (4.84 ± 3.0 vs. 2.8 ± 3.13 events/patient/6 months, p = 0.003). There was 35% reduction in hypertensive pill burden in BIS-group with similar blood pressure, compared to CL-group. Post-dialysis underhydration was more common than over or normal hydration at baseline in our population, indicating that clinical method to probe dry weight often resulted in hypovolemia. BIS method to determine dry weight resulted in normalization in volume status and consequently resulted in significant reduction in intradialytic hypotension and anti-hypertensive pill burden over 6-month period.

FAKTOR-FAKTOR YANG MEMPENGARUHI TERJADINYA HIPOTENSI INTRADIALISIS PADA PASIEN GAGAL GINJAL TERMINAL YANG MENJALANI HEMODIALISIS

One of the most common complications of chronict kidney disease patientsundergoing hemodialysis is intradialytic hypotension. This study aims to identify thefactors that influence the occurrence of intradialytic hypotension in patients with end stagerenal failure undergoing hemodialysis. The study design was cross sectional recruited of81 patients of hemodialysis patients. Data were analyzed using contingency coefficient ,spearman and logistic regression. The results showed a significant relationship betweenhistory of heart disease, intradialytic weight gain and albumin levels and the incidence ofintradialytic hypotension (p &lt;0.05). The most influence variables that influence onincidence of intradialytic hypotension was history of heart disease with OR=3.525. Nurseshave to increase their capability in monitoring factors that influence intradialytichypotension especially in pre, intra, and post hemodilaytic, giving education about waterand dietary consumption. to increase their capability in the provision of nursing care forhemodialysis patients.

Intradialytic Hypotension as an Independent Risk Factor for Long-Term Mortality in Maintaining Hemodialysis Patients: A 5-Year Follow-Up Cohort Study

Aims: This study aimed to assess risk factors of intradialytic hypotension (IDH) and the association of prognosis and IDH among maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) patients. Methods: Among 293 patients, 117 were identified with IDH (more than 4 hypotensive events during 3 months). The association between IDH and survival was evaluated. Results: The incidence of IDH was 39.9%. Age, ultrafiltration rate, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), albumin, β₂-microglobulin (β₂MG), and aortic root inside diameter (AoRD) were independently associated with IDH. During the 5-year follow-up, 84 patients died with a mortality rate 5.2 per 100 person-year. IDH-prone patients had a higher all-cause mortality rate. IDH and left ventricular mass index were independent risk factors for death (HR 1.655, 95% CI 1.061–2.580; HR 1.008, 95% CI 1.001–1.016). Conclusion: IDH is an independent risk factor for long-term mortality in MHD patients. Patients with older age, high ultrafiltration rate, high level of serum NT-proBNP and β₂MG, hypoalbuminemia, and shorter AoRD are at high risk of IDH.

FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH INTRADIALYTIC HYPOTENSION IN HEMODIALYSIS PATIENTS AND WAYS OF ITS CORRECTION. CLINIC EXPERIENCE

Results of studies in recent years show a worse survival rate of dialysis patients who have frequent episodes intradialytic hypotension (IDH), as opposed patients without IDH.&#x0D; The purpose of this quality improvement project was to study the factors associated with intradialytic hypotension in these patients and institute appropriate measures to mitigate this issue.&#x0D; Patients and methods. In our clinic, we identified that 14.3% of dialysis patients experienced a decrease in their systolic blood pressure (SBP) to below 80 during dialysis.&#x0D; Results. The results were studied for 3 months. We found that 57.1% of patients experienced an improvement in their blood pressure profile over the period of the study.&#x0D; Conclusions. Factors associated with IDH are hypocalcemia, heart failure with systolic dysfunction, increase mterdialytic body weight over 2.5 kg and hospitalizations more than 2 times/year. Suggesting that simple changes to dialysis prescription can result in a significant reduction in the incidence of IDH.&#x0D;

Effect of Dialysis Day on Intradialytic Hypotension Risk

Background/Aims: Intradialytic hypotension (IDH) is a serious and frequent complication of hemodialysis (HD). Thus far, data are scarcely available to assess the impact of first versus subsequent HD sessions of the week in IDH. Therefore, the purpose of this work was to evaluate IDH risk in patients on thrice-weekly HD. Methods: We conducted an analysis of all blood pressure (BP) measurements obtained during 492 HD treatments given to 41 prevalent adult patients over a one month period. A logistic regression model for repeated binary observations was used to determine the association between hypotension and patient and dialysis factors. Results: The incidence of IDH was 32.5%. First dialysis session of the week was associated with a 9% higher risk of hypotension relatively to the second one. The risk was even higher from the first to the third session of the week (60%) and from the second to the third (50%). A higher hypotension odds ratio was also associated with age (1.03, 90%CI: 1.01-1.06), higher predialysis BP (1.04, 90%CI: 1.03-1.05) and higher phosphorus level (1.38, 90%CI: 1.07-1.76). The risk decreased 24.4% for each additional antihypertensive drug taken by the patient. Conclusions: The odds of hypotension occurrence decrease throughout dialysis sessions of the week. Minimizing modifiable risk factors may decrease IDH episodes.