Incidence Of Immune-related Adverse Events Research Articles

Immunotherapy in thymic epithelial tumors: tissue predictive biomarkers for immune checkpoint inhibitors

Thymic epithelial tumors (TETs) are rare malignant neoplasms arising in the thymus gland. Nevertheless, TETs, including thymomas (TMs), thymic carcinomas (TCs), and thymic neuroendocrine neoplasms (TNENs), are the most common mediastinal malignancies overall. A multidisciplinary approach is required for the appropriate diagnostic and therapeutic management of TETs. To date, the main therapeutic strategies are largely depended on the stage of the tumor and they include surgery with or without neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy, represented by platinum-based chemotherapy, radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are ongoing under evaluation in the advanced or metastatic diseases despite the challenges related to the very low tumor mutation burden (TMB) and the high incidence of immune-related adverse events in TETs. In this regard, predictive impact of tissue biomarkers expression such as programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1), and other emerging biomarkers, as well as their optimal and shared interpretation are currently under evaluation in order to predict response rates to ICIs in TETs.

Safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients aged over 80 years: a retrospective cohort study

BackgroundImmuno-oncology (IO) drugs are essential for treating various cancer types; however, safety concerns persist in older patients. Although the incidence of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) is similar among age groups, higher rates of hospitalization or discontinuation of IO therapy have been reported in older patients. Limited research exists on IO drug safety and risk factors in older adults. Our investigation aimed to assess the incidence of irAEs and identify the potential risk factors associated with their development.MethodsThis retrospective analysis reviewed the clinical data extracted from the medical records of patients aged > 80 years who underwent IO treatment at our institution. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to assess the incidence of irAEs.ResultsOur study included 181 patients (median age: 82 years, range: 80–94), mostly men (73%), with a performance status of 0–1 in 87% of the cases; 64% received IO monotherapy. irAEs occurred in 35% of patients, contributing to IO therapy discontinuation in 19%. Our analysis highlighted increased body mass index, eosinophil counts, and albumin levels in patients with irAEs. Eosinophil count emerged as a significant risk factor for any grade irAEs, particularly Grade 3 or higher, with a cutoff of 118 (/μL). The group with eosinophil counts > 118 had a higher frequency of irAEs, and Grade 3 or higher events than the group with counts ≤ 118.ConclusionIO therapy is a safe treatment option for patients > 80 years old. Furthermore, patients with elevated eosinophil counts at treatment initiation should be cautiously managed.

Abstract PS08-06: A Phase Ib/II Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of PM8002 (Anti-PD-L1 x VEGF-A Bispecific Antibody) in Combination with Nab-Paclitaxel for First Line Treatment of Locally Advanced or Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

Abstract Background: PD-L1 and VEGF play important roles in immune evasion and pro-tumor angiogenesis promoting cancer growth and metastasis. PM8002 is a bispecific antibody targeting PD-L1 and VEGF-A for treating cancer. Here, we present results from a Phase Ib/II study of PM8002 in combination with nab-paclitaxel in patients with locally-advanced or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Methods: 42 patients with locally-advanced or metastatic TNBC (without prior systemic treatment) were enrolled in this Phase Ib/II study to test the safety and efficacy of PM8002 in combination with nab-paclitaxel. The first 6 patients were enrolled during Phase Ib with safety as the primary endpoint, and the remaining patients were enrolled during Phase II with objective response rate (ORR) as the primary endpoint. Each treatment cycle lasts 28 days. All patients received PM8002 at 20 mg/kg (Q2W) and nab-paclitaxel at 100 mg/m2 on the 1st, 8th, and 15th days of each cycle until unacceptable toxicity or disease progression were observed. Tumor responses were evaluated every 8 weeks according to RECIST 1.1. Safety was evaluated according to CTCAE 5.0. Nab-paclitaxel dose was reduced according to toxicity, while PM8002 dose was kept consistent according to body weight. PD-L1 expression in tumors was tested, and subgroup analysis of ORR data stratified by PD-L1 expression was also included. Results: As of June 30, 2023, 42 patients were treated and evaluated at least once for treatment efficacy. The median duration of drug exposure was 4.6 months (min, max: 2.0, 7.6). The best overall ORR was 76.2% (32/42), including 1 complete response (CR) and 31 partial responses (PRs) with 29 objective responses occurring at the patient's first evaluation. The confirmed ORR was 57.2% (24/42) and the overall disease control rate (DCR) was 95.2% (40/42). The median time to response (TTR) was 1.9 months (95% CI:1.8~2.0) and the median best percentage change from baseline for target lesions was -47.2% (Q1, Q3: -56.9%, -33.5%). Among 13 patients with PD-L1 combined positive scores (CPS) < 1, the best ORR and DCR were 69.2% (9/13) and 100.0% (13/13), respectively. Among 25 patients with PD-L1 CPS ≥1, the best ORR and DCR were 80.0% (20/25) and 96.0% (24/25), respectively. Among 9 patients with PD-L1 CPS ≥10, the best ORR and DCR were both 100.0% (9/9). At the cut-off date of data analysis, 38 patients were still on treatment with a median progression-free survival (mPFS) of 7.4 months (95% CI: 7.4~NA); 38 patients were censored due to no disease progression or death. The incidence of treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) was 95.2%, of which 26.2% were Grade 3 or 4; no Grade 5 TRAEs were observed. The incidence of drug-related TRAEs related to PM8002 was 92.9%, of which 23.8% were Grade 3 or 4. The incidence of drug-related TRAEs related to nab-paclitaxel was 95.2%, of which 26.2% were Grade 3 or 4. 1 patient (2.4%) reduced nab-paclitaxel dose due to diarrhea. 1 patient (2.4%) discontinued PM8002 and nab-paclitaxel treatment due to diarrhea. The most common TRAEs related to PM8002 and nab-paclitaxel included neutropenia (69.0%), leukocytopenia (59.5%), anemia (52.4%) and proteinuria (26.2%). The incidence of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) was 11.9%, which included hyperthyroidism, hypothyroidism, and rash. No ≥ Grade 3 irAEs were observed. AEs related to targeting VEGF were also analyzed, including hypertension 19.0% (4.8% at Grade 1, 11.9% at Grade 2, and 2.4% at Grade 3) and proteinuria 26.2% (9.5% at Grade 1, and 16.7% at Grade 2). Conclusions: Rapid, deep, and durable tumor responses were observed for the combination of PM8002 and nab-paclitaxel in patients with first line TNBC. PM8002 did not enhance toxicity that is typically observed for nab-paclitaxel. This Phase II study is still ongoing with plans for entering late-stage clinical development for solid tumors. Citation Format: Jiong Wu, Jian Zhang, Zhongsheng Tong, Qingyuan Zhang, Yong-Sheng Wang, Qiao Cheng, Xin Chen, Zhihua Li, Yongmei Yin. A Phase Ib/II Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of PM8002 (Anti-PD-L1 x VEGF-A Bispecific Antibody) in Combination with Nab-Paclitaxel for First Line Treatment of Locally Advanced or Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PS08-06.

Gender Difference in sidE eFfects of ImmuNotherapy: a possible clue to optimize cancEr tReatment (G-DEFINER): study protocol of an observational prospective multicenter study.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have significantly improved outcomes in various cancers. ICI treatment is associated with the incidence of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) which can affect any organ. Data on irAEs occurrence in relation to sex- differentiation and their association with gender-specific factors are limited. The primary objective of the G-DEFINER study is to compare the irAEs incidence in female and male patients who undergo ICI treatment. Secondary objectives are: to compare the irAEs incidence in pre- and postmenopausal female patients; to compare the irAEs incidence in female and male patients according to different clinical and gender-related factors (lifestyle, psychosocial, and behavioral factors). Exploratory objectives of the study are to compare and contrast hormonal, gene-expression, SNPs, cytokines, and gut microbiota profiles in relation to irAEs incidence in female and male patients. The patients are recruited from Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Italy, St Vincent's University Hospital, Ireland, Oslo University Hospital, Norway, and Karolinska Insitutet/Karolinska University Hospital, Sweden. The inclusion of patients was delayed due to the Covid pandemic, leading to a total of 250 patients recruited versus a planned number of 400 patients. Clinical and translational data will be analyzed. The expected outcomes are to improve the management of cancer patients treated with ICIs, leading to more personalized clinical approaches that consider potential toxicity profiles. The real world nature of the trial makes it highly applicable for timely irAEs diagnosis.

The early-stage clinical course of anti-pituitary-specific transcription factor-1 hypophysitis diagnosed post-immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment: A case with review of literature.

Anti-pituitary-specific transcription factor-1 (PIT-1) hypophysitis, a paraneoplastic syndrome resulting from an autoimmune response against PIT-1, typically manifests with undetectable levels of growth hormone (GH) and prolactin (PRL), and significantly low levels of serum thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) at diagnosis. These hormonal levels are highly specific to this disease and serve as key diagnostic indicators. Herein, we present a detailed clinical course of a 69-year-old male with a history of gastric cancer and lymph node metastases who developed anti-PIT-1 hypophysitis after the initiation of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy, specifically nivolumab, oxaliplatin, and capecitabine. The patient was referred to our department owing to decreased TSH, free triiodothyronine (T3), and free thyroxine (T4) levels after two doses of nivolumab. Initially suspected as central hypothyroidism due to ICI-related hypophysitis, further assessment confirmed the diagnosis of anti-PIT-1 hypophysitis. Notably, GH, PRL, and TSH levels markedly declined, leading to complete deficiencies 2 months after the first nivolumab dose-a pattern consistent with that of previous cases of anti-PIT-1 hypophysitis. Therefore, this report not only presents an atypical subset of ICI-related hypophysitis but also delineates the process of hormone impairment leading to complete deficiencies in anti-PIT-1 hypophysitis. This case highlights the importance of vigilant monitoring for endocrine issues in patients undergoing ICI therapy, given the escalating incidence of immune-related adverse events associated with the extensive use of ICI therapy for various cancers.

Abstract 6293: Influence of prescription opioids and recreational cannabis use on efficacy outcomes and adverse events related to immune checkpoint inhibitors

Abstract Introduction: Opioids and cannabis possess immunomodulatory properties. However, the effect of opioid receptor activity on immune function is complicated, facilitated by several mechanisms and can lead to enhancement or inhibition. Similarly, the relation between cannabinoid ligands of diverse types and endocannabinoid receptors on various immune cells is complex. We hereby delineate the effect of prescription opioids and recreational cannabis use on immune-related adverse events (IRAEs) during immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy in various cancers, as well as efficacy outcomes in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC). Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study of adult patients with advanced cancers who received ICI with or without chemotherapy for at least two months at an urban safety net hospital from January 2016 to June 2022. All patients, as well as a subset of patients with aNSCLC, were divided into two arms based on whether they were prescribed opioids during ICI therapy or not (OP vs. NO). Similarly, they were grouped based on whether they reported recreational cannabis use during ICI therapy (since initiation of therapy) or not (CA vs. NC). Incidence of IRAEs, median overall survival (mOS) and median progression-free survival (mPFS) calculated per RECIST 1.1 were the outcome variables. Multivariate logistic regression and alternative log-rank test were utilized for analysis with adjustments for demographics, insurance status, BMI, ECOG, PD-L1, TMB, smoking and concurrent chemotherapy. Results: 230 patients received ICI-based therapy; 47% were female, 34% were African American and 6.5% were Hispanic. There was no significant difference in the incidence of IRAEs between OP (n=144) and NO (n=86; p=0.225). However, CA (n=44) had higher IRAEs than NC (n=186) with an odds ratio estimate of 2.023 (X2=4.18, CI 1.03-3.97, p=0.04). Among 110 patients with aNSCLC, 46% were female. Patients with aNSCLC in the OP arm (n=69) had no significant difference in mOS (HR=1.34, CI 0.8-2.25, p=0.26) or mPFS (HR=1.21, CI 0.69-2.1, p=0.51) compared to patients in the NO arm (n=51). Similarly, the two arms CA (n=21) and NC (n=89) had no difference in mOS (HR:0.96, CI 0.5-1.83, p=0.89) or mPFS (HR:1.18, CI 0.61-2.29, p=0.63) for aNSCLC. Conclusion: Recreational cannabis use during ICI therapy increased the incidence of IRAEs. Prescription opioids and recreational cannabis use did not significantly affect survival outcomes for ICI in aNSCLC. Prescription opioid use also did not significantly influence the occurrence of IRAEs. This study suggests that recreational cannabis may need to be used with caution in this patient population due to its influence on IRAEs. On the other hand, opioids appear to be a safe option for pain management in these patients. Larger studies are warranted to shed more insight into the effect of these substances on ICI therapy. Citation Format: Himil Mahadevia, Benjamin Eidenschink, An-Lin Cheng, Atharva Desai, Stephanie Harry, Lara Kujtan. Influence of prescription opioids and recreational cannabis use on efficacy outcomes and adverse events related to immune checkpoint inhibitors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 6293.

Abstract 6391: Spatial proteomic profiling unveils pre-existing anti-tumor immunity as a hallmark of exceptional benefit from immunotherapy in NSCLC

Abstract Background: Immunotherapy is firmly established as a treatment regimen in various solid tumors due to its exceptional benefits observed in a select group of patients. Despite widespread use of immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) across diverse solid tumors, including non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the quest for a clinically informative biomarker for long-term benefit remains unmet. Here we investigate the potential utility of clinicopathological and spatial proteomic profiling of tumor specimens from NSCLC patients to identify predictive biomarkers of long-term benefit to ICB. Methods: Forty-nine patients diagnosed with advanced NSCLC who received ICB at Hospital del Mar, Barcelona between 2017-2021 were included. Long-term responders (LTR, n=21) were defined as patients achieving a maintained radiologic response for more than 2 years, and short-term responders (STR, n=28) as patients presenting disease progression within the first six months of ICB initiation. Clinicopathological information, incidence of immune related adverse (irAES) and PD-L1 tumor proportion score assessed by IHC was available for all of them. DSP GeoMx was performed in subset of patients (LTR n=14 and STR n=14), to assess 49 immune biomarkers. Pancytokeratin (panCK; epithelial), CD3, CD20 and SYTO 13 (nuclear) were utilized as morphology biomarkers. Regions of interest were placed in tissue areas containing tumor and segmented in Tumor (PanCK+) and tumor microenvironment (TME) (PanCK-) that was used on downstream analysis. Digital counts were normalized using the protein expression of housekeeper proteins. Statistical analysis was performed using linear mixed models. A P value less than 0.05 was considered significant. Results: Our analysis revealed specific characteristics of LTR patients compared with STR, namely LTR population was enriched for PD-L1 positive in tumors (p=0.005) and a higher incidence of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) (p=0.001). Within the Tumor compartment, LTR patients displayed significantly higher levels of IDO1, CD8, PD-L1, CD45, HLA-DR and STING, while STR patients exhibit higher levels of B7-H3, CD56 and OX40L (p<0.05 for all proteins). Comparison analysis of the TME compartment between LTR and STR revealed augmented levels of IDO1, CD8, CD45, CD11c, CD27 and CD3 in LTR patients, and lower levels of B7H3 and OX40L compared with STR patients (p<0.05 for all proteins). Conclusions: Our comprehensive analysis of metastatic NSCLC patients treated with ICB has unveiled distinct clinicopathological and immunological features associated with long-term benefit of ICB, highlighting the presence of pre-existing antitumor immunity as a stronger predictor of long-term benefit. These findings offer insights into potential biomarkers and therapeutic strategies for enhancing ICB outcomes in metastatic NSCLC. Citation Format: Sharia Hernandez, Rafael Bach, Mario Giner, Wei Lu, Larisa Kostousov, Sean Barnes, Khaja Khan, Laura Masfarré, Xavier Villanueva, Ignacio Sanchéz, Nil Navarro, Álvaro Taus, Miguel Galindo, Max Hardy, Raúl Del Rey-Vergara, Albert Iñañez, Beatriz Sanchez-Espiridion, Laura Moliner, Sergi Clavé, Beatriz Bellosillo, Ana Rovira, Júlia Perera-Bel, Ignacio Wistuba, Edurne Arriola, Luisa M. Solis, Pedro Rocha. Spatial proteomic profiling unveils pre-existing anti-tumor immunity as a hallmark of exceptional benefit from immunotherapy in NSCLC [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 6391.

Abstract 735: Mitigation of liver toxicity effects of bispecific T cell engagers in immune-competent liver-tumor co-culturing high-throughput platform

Abstract The remarkable clinical therapeutic effects and wide-ranging applications of bispecific T cell engagers (BiTEs) have revolutionized the treatment approaches in the field of oncology. While the advantages of these innovative immunotherapies are undeniable, it is imperative to thoroughly investigate their safety aspects. With increasing use of biologics for treatment of various cancers, the incidence of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) will undoubtedly increase. Therefore, there is a compelling need to develop measures to effectively prevent or manage irARs already on the stage of the development of new clinical candidates. To address this need, we have created a high-throughput, automation friendly, 384-well-format platform in which 3D spheroid models are co-cultured in units interconnected by microfluidic channel. The tissue-tissue interaction was facilitated by a gravity-driven, tubeless flow system. The design allows for the simultaneous evaluation of the anti-tumor efficacy and liver safety of immunotherapeutics. In our system, we employed 3D spheroids comprised of primary human hepatocytes and Kupffer cells to model the liver, ensuring the preservation of their metabolic and inflammatory functions. Additionally, we established a solid tumor model using human cancer cell lines (HCT116-GFP) and primary cancer-associated fibroblasts, effectively mimicking the complex tumor microenvironment We treated 3D spheroid models with runimotamab (HER2xCD3 BiTE), catumaxomab (EPCAMxCD3), nivatrotamab (GD2xCD3) and control bispecific antibodies in the presence of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). Tumor viability and growth was assessed by fluorescence measurements, while liver toxicity and function were monitored by release of liver aminotransferases ALT and microscopy. To mitigate potential liver toxicity, we co-treated spheroid co-cultures with adalimumab (anti-TNF), tocilizumab (anti-IL-6R), raleukin (IL-1R antagonist) (each 100ug/ml), desatanib, dexamethasone or ruxolitinib (each 100nM). The treatment with all bispecific antibodies resulted in a significant decrease of fluorescence and size of tumor spheroids in comparison to control antibody. At the same time increased ALT concentrations were observed after the treatment with BiTEs. The application of small molecular drugs protected against liver damage, but also severely disrupted tumor killing. Interestingly, adalimumab revealed liver protective actions without affecting tumor killing, suggesting TNF-mediated mechanism of toxicity. In summary, we have developed a relevant, high-throughput platform for the evaluation of novel immunotherapies closely reflecting clinical scenarios. High throughput of the assay represents a powerful screening tool for clinical candidate development. Citation Format: Michal Rudnik, Lisa Hölting, Tamara Häfeli, Özlem Yavaş Grining, Frauke Greve, Daniela Ortiz Franyuti, Ramona Matheis, Laure-Anne Ligeon, Ekaterina Breous-Nystrom, Olivier Frey. Mitigation of liver toxicity effects of bispecific T cell engagers in immune-competent liver-tumor co-culturing high-throughput platform [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 735.

Efficacy and Safety of Pembrolizumab Monotherapy or Combined Therapy in Patients with Metastatic Triple-negative Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials

Background: Metastatic Triple-negative Breast Cancer (mTNBC) is the most aggressive form of breast cancer, with a greater risk of metastasis and recurrence. Research studies have published in-depth analyses of the advantages and disadvantages of pembrolizumab, and early data from numerous trials suggests that patients with mTNBC have had remarkable outcomes. This meta-analysis compares the data from numerous relevant studies in order to evaluate the safety and efficacy of pembrolizumab monotherapy or combination therapies for mTNBC. Methods: To identify eligible RCTs, a thorough literature search was carried out using electronic databases. CMA software was utilized to perform heterogeneity tests using fixed and random-effects models. Results: According to our pooled data, the median Progression-free Survival (PFS) was 2.66 months, and the median overall survival (OS) was 12.26 months. Furthermore, by comparing efficacy indicators between PD-L1–positive and PD-L1–negative groups, a correlation was found between the overexpression of PD-L1 with OS, PFS, and ORR. Patients with PD-L1-positive tumors had a higher response rate, with an ORR of 21.1%, compared to the patients with PD-L1-negative tumors. The ORR for first-line immunotherapy was higher than that of ≥second-line immunotherapy. In addition, pembrolizumab plus combination treatment resulted in a pooled incidence of immune-related adverse events of 22.7%. Conclusion: A modest response to pembrolizumab monotherapy was detected in the mTNBC patients. Furthermore, a better outcome from pembrolizumab treatment may be predicted by PD-L1-- positive status, non-liver/lung metastases, combination therapy, and first-line immunotherapy. Pembrolizumab, in combination with chemotherapy, may be more beneficial for patients whose tumors are PD-L1 positive.

Safety and efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitor rechallenge in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a retrospective study

We conducted a retrospective study to evaluate the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) rechallenge in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The study included 111 patients who had previously received ICI therapy and experienced disease progression. The primary endpoints assessed were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and objective response rate (ORR). Our findings revealed that the ICI rechallenge showed promising results in improving patient outcomes. OS (r) is the time from rechallenging with immune checkpoint inhibitors to the last follow-up or death from any cause. The median OS (r) was 14.3 months (95% CI 11.3–17.3 months), with a median PFS (r) of 5.9 months (95% CI 4.1–7.7 months). The ORR was 17.1%; the DCR was 82.3%. Subgroup analysis demonstrated that patients without brain or liver metastases had a longer OS (r) compared to those with metastases (21.6 vs. 13.8 months, χ2 = 3.873, P = 0.046; 20.8 vs. 9.1 months, χ2 = 10.733, P = 0.001, respectively). Moreover, patients without driver gene mutations exhibited significantly longer OS than those with mutations or wild-type patients (22.9 vs. 16.1 vs. 7.5 months, χ2 = 10.710, P = 0.005). Notably, patients who switched to a different ICI during the rechallenge had shorter OS than those who did not change medications (10.4 vs. 21.1 months, χ2 = 9.014, P = 0.003). The incidence of immune-related adverse events did not significantly differ between the two treatment phases. These findings suggest that ICI rechallenge may be a viable therapeutic strategy for select NSCLC patients. Further prospective studies are needed to validate these results and guide treatment decisions for advanced NSCLC.

P641 Faecal calprotectin determines non-response to corticosteroids in patients with immune checkpoint inhibitor colitis

Abstract Background Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy has improved survival outcomes in patients with advanced malignancy. ICI colitis (ICI-C) is one of the most common adverse events which often leads to cessation of an otherwise effective therapy.1,2 Corticosteroid therapy remains first-line treatment in patients with ICI-C. The aim of this study was to assess predictors of non-response to corticosteroid therapy to help guide early escalation to biologic therapy. Methods Multicentre retrospective analysis of adults hospitalized with ICI-C between July 2018 to March 2023. ICI-C was defined by patients who had current or prior immunotherapy who presented with diarrhoea with negative infective faeces PCR testing and admission diagnosis of ICI-C by their treating Physician. Baseline demographic, clinical, biochemical, and endoscopic data were collected. Grading of clinical severity on presentation and response to immunosuppression was defined by CTCAE diarrhoea grading with response defined as improvement to grade 1 or less. Results 82 patients were analysed. 31 (38%) female, median age was 65.5 years (IQR 59-72)], 27 (33%) failed corticosteroid therapy and required biologic therapy. 34 (42%) had a faecal calprotectin on admission. On univariable analysis faecal calprotectin emerged as the sole predictor of corticosteroid non-response. ROC analysis identified an optimal faecal calprotectin cut-off of 620 mcg/g to identify corticosteroid non-responders [Sensitivity 75% (57.6-92.7), Specificity 77.8% (52.4-93.6), Accuracy 76.5%, PLR 3.37 (1.36-8.38), NLR 0.32 (0.13-0.78), AUROC 0.76 (0.616-0.911), OR 10.5 (2.24-49.3), PPV 75 (47.6-92.7), NPV 77.8 ( 52.4-93.6)].12/16 (75%) of patients with a faecal calprotectin ≥ 620 required biologic therapy. Conclusion Faecal calprotectin is a predictor of non-response to corticosteroid therapy in patients with immune checkpoint inhibitor colitis. This study identified a faecal calprotectin threshold of 620mcg/g as the optimal cut-off to identify corticosteroid non-response and need for second-line immunosuppression. These findings may help to reduce the need for endoscopic assessment and guide early escalation to biologic therapy. REFERENCES: 1. Fujii T, Colen RR, Bilen MA, et al. Incidence of immune-related adverse events and its association with treatment outcomes: The MD Anderson Cancer Center experience. Invest New Drugs. 2018;36(4):638-646. doi:10.1007/s10637-017-0534-0 2. Wang Y, Abu-Sbeih H, Mao E, et al. Endoscopic and Histologic Features of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Related Colitis. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2018;24(8):1695-1705. doi:10.1093/ibd/izy104.

Immune-related adverse events in patients with gastrointestinal cancer undergoing pembrolizumab monotherapy: A systematic review of clinical trials.

744 Background: Pembrolizumab, an immune checkpoint inhibitor targeting programmed death 1 (PD-1), is widely employed in the treatment of various gastrointestinal (GI) cancers. This systematic review aims to assess the spectrum and incidence of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) associated with pembrolizumab monotherapy in GI cancer patients. Methods: A comprehensive search of PubMed/MEDLINE was conducted to identify full-text articles of clinical trials investigating pembrolizumab monotherapy in GI cancer patients. Two independent authors reviewed the articles and extracted data, with discrepancies resolved by consensus. Primary endpoints included the incidence of grade 3 or higher irAEs and the treatment discontinuation rate due to irAEs. Secondary endpoints encompassed the incidence of any-grade irAEs and specific irAEs such as pneumonitis, colitis, hepatitis, myositis, myocarditis, nephritis, pancreatitis, peripheral neuropathy, skin toxicity, endocrine toxicity, infusion reactions, and deaths. Results: After excluding duplicates and articles not meeting inclusion criteria, data extraction and analysis were performed on 25 selected articles. Common reasons for exclusion included concomitant use of chemotherapy or targeted therapy and trials involving non-GI cancer patients. The analysis included 2866 patients with a median age of 62 years, of which 29% were female. Tumor types included colorectal (13%), esophagogastric (46%), hepatocellular carcinoma (25%), and others (16%). The aggregate incidence of grade 3 or higher irAEs was 8.7%, with reported rates ranging from 3% to 41% across different trials. The incidence of any grade irAEs varied from 39% to 98%. The treatment discontinuation rate due to irAEs was 6.8%. The most common grade 3 or higher irAEs were hepatitis (3.6%), pneumonitis (0.8%), and colitis (0.7%). irAE-related deaths were infrequent (0.9%). Detailed irAE data are summarized in the Table. Conclusions: In GI cancer patients receiving pembrolizumab monotherapy, severe irAEs are rare. Treatment discontinuation and deaths attributed to pembrolizumab-related irAEs are infrequent, underscoring the safety profile of this therapy in patients with GI cancer. [Table: see text]

Perioperative Toripalimab Plus Chemotherapy for Patients With Resectable Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer

Adjuvant and neoadjuvant immunotherapy have improved clinical outcomes for patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the optimal combination of checkpoint inhibition with chemotherapy remains unknown. To determine whether toripalimab in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy will improve event-free survival and major pathological response in patients with stage II or III resectable NSCLC compared with chemotherapy alone. This randomized clinical trial enrolled patients with stage II or III resectable NSCLC (without EGFR or ALK alterations for nonsquamous NSCLC) from March 12, 2020, to June 19, 2023, at 50 participating hospitals in China. The data cutoff date for this interim analysis was November 30, 2022. Patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive 240 mg of toripalimab or placebo once every 3 weeks combined with platinum-based chemotherapy for 3 cycles before surgery and 1 cycle after surgery, followed by toripalimab only (240 mg) or placebo once every 3 weeks for up to 13 cycles. The primary outcomes were event-free survival (assessed by the investigators) and the major pathological response rate (assessed by blinded, independent pathological review). The secondary outcomes included the pathological complete response rate (assessed by blinded, independent pathological review) and adverse events. Of the 501 patients randomized, 404 had stage III NSCLC (202 in the toripalimab + chemotherapy group and 202 in the placebo + chemotherapy group) and 97 had stage II NSCLC and were excluded from this interim analysis. The median age was 62 years (IQR, 56-65 years), 92% of patients were male, and the median follow-up was 18.3 months (IQR, 12.7-22.5 months). For the primary outcome of event-free survival, the median length was not estimable (95% CI, 24.4 months-not estimable) in the toripalimab group compared with 15.1 months (95% CI, 10.6-21.9 months) in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.40 [95% CI, 0.28-0.57], P < .001). The major pathological response rate (another primary outcome) was 48.5% (95% CI, 41.4%-55.6%) in the toripalimab group compared with 8.4% (95% CI, 5.0%-13.1%) in the placebo group (between-group difference, 40.2% [95% CI, 32.2%-48.1%], P < .001). The pathological complete response rate (secondary outcome) was 24.8% (95% CI, 19.0%-31.3%) in the toripalimab group compared with 1.0% (95% CI, 0.1%-3.5%) in the placebo group (between-group difference, 23.7% [95% CI, 17.6%-29.8%]). The incidence of immune-related adverse events occurred more frequently in the toripalimab group. No unexpected treatment-related toxic effects were identified. The incidence of grade 3 or higher adverse events, fatal adverse events, and adverse events leading to discontinuation of treatment were comparable between the groups. The addition of toripalimab to perioperative chemotherapy led to a significant improvement in event-free survival for patients with resectable stage III NSCLC and this treatment strategy had a manageable safety profile. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04158440.

Incidence of immune-related adverse events in U.S. veterans treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are associated with potentially severe immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Emerging clinical practice reports have suggested higher incidence of irAEs in real-world settings than initially observed in phase III clinical trials. Objectives were to determine the incidence of irAEs associated with ICIs in a clinical population, the Veterans Health Administration, characterize their time to onset, and explore potential risk factors. This retrospective observational study included patients from eight Midwest VA medical centers who initiated an ICI between January 1, 2014, and June 30, 2022. Courses of incident prednisone therapy lasting at least seven days at a dose ≥ 20 mg/day were used to identify irAEs, within two years following ICI initiation. A multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to explore potential irAE risk factors. Of 1314 patients, the incidence of irAEs was 19.8%, with most (86.5%) occurring within one year of ICI initiation. Monthly incidence rates peaked three months following ICI initiation at 3.0% and decreased thereafter. Female gender (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.01, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.01-4.00) and combination therapy with ipilimumab and nivolumab (HR = 2.46, 95% CI: 1.44-4.21) were significantly associated with irAE incidence. These findings are consistent with recent studies in clinical populations that demonstrate higher irAE incidence rates than originally reported in clinical trials. Our findings may enhance prompt recognition and treatment of irAEs for VA patients.

Adverse events of neoadjuvant combination immunotherapy for resectable cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Neoadjuvant combination immunotherapy is changing the treatment landscape for patients with cancer. Exploring the incidence of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) in relation to this novel approach may provide valuable insights for future clinical investigations. This review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), and European Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO) websites were searched for all relevant literature from their inception to November 24, 2023. We then extracted the required data from the included studies and used the R software to analyze the pooled incidence of irAEs. Subgroup analyses examined the pooled incidence of irAEs according to cancer and combination types using a random-effects model. Sixteen studies involving 501 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Considering the heterogeneity of the study design, we analyzed the randomized controlled studies (RCTs) and the single-arm studies separately. In RCTs, the incidence of any-grade irAEs was 95.0% (95% confidence interval [CI] 87.3-99.3) and that of grade ≥3 irAEs was 24.0% (95% CI 13.7-36.0). In single-arm studies, the incidence of any-grade irAEs was 89.4% (95% CI 75.0-98.0) and grade ≥3 irAEs was 20.3% (95% CI 8.7-35.2). In both RCTs and single arms, the most common any- grade irAEs were rash and fatigue, while the most common grade ≥3 irAEs was abnormal liver function and colitis. Due to irAEs, 9.4% of patients in RCTs and 6.9% of patients in single-arm studies did not complete the prescribed neoadjuvant treatment cycle. This study comprehensively summarized the incidence of irAEs in neoadjuvant combination immunotherapy. The occurrence of irAEs varies depending on the cancer and combination types. Our meta-analysis provides clinicians with essential guidance for the management of patients with cancer. https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero, identifier CRD42023387969.

The Timing, Trajectory, and Incidence of Immune-Related Adverse Events in NSCLC Treated With Atezolizumab

IntroductionImmune-related adverse events (irAEs) due to immune checkpoint inhibitors can have complicated clinical courses. We comprehensively evaluated the timing, trajectory, and incidence of both single and multiple irAEs for NSCLC treated with atezolizumab. MethodsData were pooled from 2457 patients who participated in the IMpower130, IMpower132, and IMpower150 clinical trials investigating the use of atezolizumab in metastatic NSCLC as part of a chemoimmunotherapy regimen. Longitudinal irAE data with landmark analysis, time-to-onset, changes in grading severity, and occurrence of multiple events were summarized. ResultsIn general, 1557 patients were treated with atezolizumab and 900 patients were in the control groups. Median follow-up was 32.3 and 23.5 months, respectively. In the atezolizumab group, 753 patients (48.4%) experienced at least one irAE. In the control group, 289 patients (32.1%) experienced at least one nonimmune adverse event that was attributed to an irAE. In the atezolizumab group, the most common irAEs were rash, hepatitis, and hypothyroidism. Furthermore, 13% of the patients experienced two irAEs and 4% experienced three irAEs. Within 5 months of treatment, the cumulative incidence for any irAE was 39.2%. Median time-to-onset varied from 1 to 10 months based on the specific irAE. Grade 1 to 2 irAEs increased in severity for 33% of the patients. ConclusionsWe identified dynamic clinical patterns for irAEs in patients treated with atezolizumab, including variations in time-to-onset, incidence of multiple irAEs, and frequency of irAEs increasing in severity. These results can guide clinical management and future reporting of adverse events to enable comprehensive longitudinal analyses.

Out-of-hours admissions in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors and their primary management with steroids.

The incidence of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) from immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) is well described. However, the impact on emergency care services is not. This study investigated the incidence of irAEs out-of-hours, and the management used to mitigate symptoms and side effects. This retrospective cohort study reviewed all emergency presentations triaged by the acute oncology team between December 2021 and June 2022, between 5 pm and 9 am. Patients were identified from triage audit sheets and remaining data points were retrieved from electronic health records. Inclusion criteria included all adult patients admitted on an ICI at one tertiary centre. In 7 months, 970 patients called the acute oncology helpline 11% (n = 109) of patients were on an ICI treatment. After clinical review, 78% (n = 70) resulted in hospital admissions, with length of stay cumulating to 496 bed days. 56% (n = 39) of patients delayed reporting symptoms, ranging between 12 hours and 10 days from symptom onset to seeking support. 49% (n = 34) patients received steroids to manage suspected irAEs. Dexamethasone was the most common steroid used in 71% (n = 24) of patients, and variation was found in prescribed doses. These results underline the urgent need to address patient and staff education on adverse effects related to ICI. Patients require a comprehensive understanding of the symptoms and importance of prompt reporting. Staff education on recognition and treatment management is needed to reduce variation in practice. Further research is needed to identify barriers in symptom reporting and focus on realtime reporting to reduce the out-of-hours burden on services.

Real-world efficacy and safety of low-dose pembrolizumab in patients with advanced and refractory gynecologic cancers

The approved standard dose of pembrolizumab (200mg administrated every 3 weeks) for cancer treatment imposes a significant financial burden on patients. However, no study has analyzed the clinical outcomes of low-dose pembrolizumab among individuals diagnosed with gynecologic cancer. The primary objective of this study was to assess the effectiveness and safety of a low-dose pembrolizumab regimen in real-world clinical practice. We retrospectively assessed the efficacy and safety data of patients with gynecologic malignancies who received pembrolizumab between 2017 and 2022at Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital. Furthermore, we conducted a comparative analysis of the objective response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS) between patients with deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) and proficient MMR (pMMR). A total of thirty-nine patients were included and received pembrolizumab at fixed dosages of 50mg (5.1%), 100mg (84.6%) and 200mg (10.3%) per cycle. Compared to the pMMR group, the dMMR group exhibited a tendency toward improved ORR (45.5% vs. 13.0%, p=0.074), and notably, the median duration of response remained unreached. There was no significant difference in PFS between the dMMR and pMMR groups; however, the patients with dMMR in tumor tissue had a trend of better survival (p=0.079). Incidence of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) of any grade was observed in 13 patients (33.3%), with 3 individuals (7.7%) experiencing grade 3 or 4 events. Low-dose pembrolizumab may be a cost-effective and safe treatment option without compromising clinical outcomes in patients with refractory gynecologic cancers.

Immune-Related Adverse Event Likelihood Score Identifies "Pure" IRAEs Strongly Associated With Outcome in a Phase I-II Trial Population.

Immune-related adverse events (IRAE) pose a significant diagnostic and therapeutic challenge in patients treated with immune-oncology (IO) drugs. IRAEs have been suggested to correlate with better outcome, but studies are conflicting. Estimating the true incidence of IRAEs is particularly difficult in the early phase I/II trial setting. A key issue is the lack of IRAE diagnostic criteria, necessary to discriminate "pure" IRAEs from other treatment-related adverse events not sustained by an autoimmune process. In patients treated with immune-oncology (IO) drugs in phases I-II trials at our institute, we identified high confidence (HC) or low confidence (LC) IRAEs by clinical consensus. We empirically developed an IRAE likelihood score (ILS) based on commonly available clinical data. Correlation with outcome was explored by multivariate Cox analysis. To mitigate immortal time-bias, analyses were conducted (1) at 2-month landmark and (2) modeling IRAEs as time-dependent covariate. Among 202 IO-treated patients, 29.2% developed >1 treatment-related adverse events (TRAE). Based on ILS >5, we classified patients in no IRAE (n = 143), HC IRAE (n = 24), or LC IRAE (n = 35). hazard ratios (HR) for HC were significantly lower than LC patients (HR for PFS ranging 0.24-0.44, for OS 0.18-0.23, all P < .01). ILS provides a simple system to identify bona fide IRAEs, pruning for other treatment-related events likely due to different pathophysiology. Applying stringent criteria leads to lower and more reliable estimates of IRAE incidence and identifies events with significant impact on survival.

Utilization and toxicity patterns of 2-weekly (Q2W) versus 4-weekly (Q4W) nivolumab for treatment of adjuvant and metastatic melanoma at BC cancer.

Nivolumab, an immune checkpoint inhibitor used to treat several malignancies, is associated with immune-related adverse events (IrAEs). Original dosing for melanoma was 3 mg/kg (maximum 240 mg) every 2 weeks (Q2W). Based on simulation studies depicting similar efficacy and toxicity to original dosing, extended interval dosing of 6 mg/kg (maximum 480 mg) every 4 weeks (Q4W) was introduced. This study will compare safety between Q2W and Q4W dosing at BC Cancer in melanoma patients. Retrospective chart review for reported incidence, onset, and severity of IrAEs in melanoma patients treated with nivolumab Q2W and Q4W dosing was completed. Fisher's test was conducted for first incidence IrAEs using Microsoft Excel. Seventy-one patients were identified (Q2W n = 35, Q4W n = 36). Baseline characteristics were similar in both groups. No statistically significant difference was found in incidence of IrAEs between Q2W and Q4W dosing (Q2W 40% vs Q4W 50%, p = 0.477). Rash was most common (Q2W 79% vs Q4W 50%) followed by hypothyroidism (Q2W 33% vs Q4W 20%). Median onset of IrAEs seemed later with Q4W dosing (Q2W cycle 1 vs Q4W cycle 4). Regardless of dosing, most IrAEs were grade 1-2 in severity (Q2W 100% vs Q4W 89%). Q4W dosing is associated with comparable incidence and potentially later onset of IrAEs compared to Q2W dosing. Most IrAEs in both dosing groups were similar and mild. Therefore, Q4W dosing offers a safe alternative to Q2W dosing while providing benefits including decreased workload for staff, decreased clinic visits, and viral exposure by patients.