Incidence Of Iatrogenic Nerve Injury Research Articles

Iatrogenic nerve injury in primary and revision reverse total shoulder arthroplasty

IntroductionIatrogenic nerve injury in orthopedic surgery can impair functional outcomes. During the last years, a steady increase in the number of performed reverse total shoulder arthroplasties has been reported and complications associated with this procedure are continuously described. Neurological complications, however, remain underreported. The aims of this study were to calculate the incidence of iatrogenic nerve injury after primary and revision reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in a large patient cohort, as well as identify associated patient-and surgery-related risk factors.Materials and methodsA retrospective review of our institution’s internal Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty (RTSA) database from September 2005 to December 2019 was undertaken and 34 patients with iatrogenic nerve injuries were identified, resulting in a neurological complication rate of 2.6%. Group comparisons between patients with nerve injuries (n = 34) and the remaining cohort without nerve injuries (n = 1275) were performed to identify patient- and surgery-related risk factors.ResultsOf the 34 cases with iatrogenic nerve injury, damage to terminal nerve branches occurred in 21 patients, whereas a brachial plexus lesion was diagnosed in the other 13. Nerve revision surgery was necessary in four patients. At final follow-up 13 patients (45%) had residual motor deficits and 17 (59%) had residual sensory deficits. Higher numbers of previous surgeries of the affected shoulder correlated with subsequent nerve injury (p = 0.035). Operative time was significantly longer in patients, who developed a neurologic deficit, showing a correlation between duration of surgery and occurrence of nerve injury (p = 0.013). Patients with neurologic complications were significantly younger than patients without nerve damage (median 68 vs. 72 years, p = 0.017).ConclusionsIn specialists’ hands reverse total shoulder arthroplasty is a rather safe procedure regarding the risk of neurologic injury. However, multiple previous surgeries of the affected shoulder increase the risk of neurological complications. Cases with post-operative neurologic compromise are rare and usually recover well, with few patients suffering long-term functional deficits from iatrogenic nerve injury.Level of evidenceLevel III, retrospective cohort study.

201 Compliance to New BOAST's Guidelines for Paediatric Supracondylar Fractures in the Middle of COVID Pandemic

Abstract Aim Amid COVID pressures, standards of surgical practices need constant reviewing to maintain patient safety and streamline care pathways. Newly published BOAST (British Orthopaedic Association Standards for Trauma and Orthopaedics) guidelines for paediatric supracondylar fractures became a benchmark against which a restructured DGH trauma unit's performance can be appraised. Method Theatre records were analysed between April-2020 and September-2020. Data were collected to reveal time to theatre, operative techniques, documentations of ulnar nerve protection, complications, follow-up plans, time to first post-op radiograph and to wire removal. Results 90% of patients underwent operations within 24–48 hour. Although there was no incidence of iatrogenic nerve injury, documentation of ulnar nerve protection was not identified in 45% of crossed wire fixations. Wire size was not mentioned in 14%. 33% did not have first follow-up with radiograph within 4–10 days, and 43% of patients did not have the wires removed till 4 weeks post op. Conclusion This re-audit highlights the need to improve in documentation for ulnar nerve protection and to identify the delays in follow-up appointments. Although BOAST no longer recommends a fixed timeframe for follow-up plan, first radiograph within 4–10 days and wire removal within 4 weeks are still reasonable locally.

Best Practices in Facial Nerve Monitoring.

Facial nerve monitoring (FNM) has evolved into a widely used adjunct for many surgical procedures along the course of the facial nerve. Even though majority opinion holds that FNM reduces the incidence of iatrogenic nerve injury, there are few if any studies yielding high-level evidence and no practice guidelines on which clinicians can rely. Instead, a review of the literature and medicolegal cases reveals significant variations in methodology, training, and clinical indications. Literature review and expert opinion. Given the lack of standard references to serve as a resource for FNM, we assembled a multidisciplinary group of experts representing more than a century of combined monitoring experience to synthesize the literature and provide a rational basis to improve the quality of patient care during FNM. Over the years, two models of monitoring have become well-established: 1) monitoring by the surgeon using a stand-alone device that provides auditory feedback of facial electromyography directly to the surgeon, and 2) a team, typically consisting of surgeon, technologist, and interpreting neurophysiologist. Regardless of the setting and the number of people involved, the reliability of monitoring depends on the integration of proper technical performance, accurate interpretation of responses, and their timely application to the surgical procedure. We describe critical steps in the technical set-up and provide a basis for context-appropriate interpretation and troubleshooting of recorded signals. We trust this initial attempt to describe best practices will serve as a basis for improving the quality of patient care while reducing inappropriate variations. 4 Laryngoscope, 131:S1-S42, 2021.

Distribution patterns of the cutaneous nerves on the dorsum of the foot and their clinical significance.

The aim of this study was to clarify the distribution patterns of the cutaneous nerves on the dorsum of the foot. This study investigated 130 feet of 77 cadavers. The distribution patterns of the sural (SN) and deep fibular nerves (DFN) were classified into five and four types, respectively. In Type A, the SN was only distributed to the lateral side of the fifth toe. In Type B, the nerve was distributed to the medial side of the fourth toe and both sides of the fifth toe. In Type C, the nerve was mainly distributed to the lateral side of the fifth toe. In Type D, the nerve was distributed to the lateral side of the third toe and both sides of the fourth and fifth toes. In Type E, no SN was found. In Type α, the DFN was simultaneously distributed to the lateral side of the first toe and the medial side of the second toe. In Type β, the nerve was distributed like in Type α and additionally to the medial side of the first toe. In Type γ, the nerve was distributed like in Type α and additionally to the lateral side of the second toe and the medial side of the third toe. In Type δ, no DFN was found. The results of this study will help physicians to reduce the incidence of iatrogenic nerve injury and improve the quality of diagnoses of relevant nerves in this body region. Clin. Anat. 33:592-597, 2020. © 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Multicentre collaborative cohort study of the use of Kirschner wires for the management of supracondylar fractures in children

PurposeSupracondylar fractures of the humerus cause significant morbidity in children. Nerve damage and loss of fracture reduction are common recognised complications in patients with this injury. Uncertainty surrounds the optimal Kirschner wire configuration and diameter for closed reduction and pinning of these fractures. This study describes current practice and examined the association between wire configuration or diameter and outcomes (clinical and radiological) in the operative management of paediatric supracondylar fractures. MethodsChildren presenting with Gartland II or III supracondylar fractures at five hospitals in south-west England were eligible for inclusion. Collaborators scrutinised paper and electronic case notes. Outcome measures were maintenance of reduction and iatrogenic nerve injury. ResultsAltogether 209 patients were eligible for inclusion: 15.7% had a documented neurological deficit at presentation; 3.9% who were neurologically intact at presentation sustained a new deficit caused by treatment and 13.4% experienced a clinically significant loss of reduction following fixation. Maintenance of reduction was significantly better in patients treated specifically with crossed ×3 Kirschner wire configuration compared to all other configurations. The incidence of iatrogenic nerve injury was not significantly different between groups treated with different wire configurations. ConclusionWe present a large multicentre cohort study showing that crossed ×3 Kirschner wires are associated with better maintenance of reduction than crossed ×2 or lateral entry wires. Greater numbers would be required to properly investigate nerve injury relating to operative management of supracondylar fractures. We found significant variations in practice and compliance with the British Orthopaedic Association Standard for Trauma (BOAST) 11 guidelines.

Comparison of clinic-radiological outcome of cross pinning versus lateral pinning for displaced supracondylar fracture of humerus in children: A randomized controlled trial

IntroductionSupracondylar fracture of humerus (SFH) is frequently encountered in the immature skeleton, [1] predominantly in the non-dominant extremity. AimThis study compared the clinic-radiological outcome between cross pinning with lateral pinning for fixation of displaced supracondylar fracture of humerus in children. Materials and methodsAll eligible patients were randomized into two groups, group I for lateral pinning and group II for cross pinning. Before passing medial pin in group II a stab incision was given to visualise the medial epicondyle. Patients were followed up on 3 weeks, 6 weeks and 3 months. Final outcome was measured in terms of clinic-radiological union, Baumann angle, loss of reduction, stability of fracture fixation, incidence of iatrogenic nerve injury and Flynn's score. Results: There were 37 patients in group I and 40 in group II. Both groups were comparable in terms of demographic details. At the final outcome there were no difference in between the groups in terms of all radiological and clinical outcome. Two patients of group I developed delay ulnar neuritis, which resolve completely in subsequent follow-up. ConclusionBoth techniques provide stable fixation, union and good functional outcome without iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury provided that small incision sufficient enough to identify the medial epicondyle is given with passing of medial pin.