Incidence Of Drug-related Adverse Events Research Articles

Efficacy and safety of pelvic floor magnetic stimulation combined with mirabegron in female patients with refractory overactive bladder: a prospective study.

To observe the efficacy and safety of pelvic floor magnetic stimulation (PFMS) combined with mirabegron in female patients with refractory overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms. A total of 160 female patients with refractory OAB symptoms were prospectively randomized into two groups. Eighty cases in the combination group accepted PFMS and mirabegron therapy and 80 cases as control only accepted mirabegron therapy (The clinical trial registry number: ChiCTR2200070171). The lower urinary tract symptoms, OAB questionnaire (OAB-q) health-related quality of life (HRQol), symptom bother score and OABSS between two groups were compared at the 1st, 2nd and 4th week ends. All of 160 patients were randomly assigned to two groups, of which 80 patients were included in the combination group and 80 in the mirabegron group. The incidences of LUTS, including urgency, frequent urination, and incontinence episodes, in the 2nd week and the 4th week after combination treatment were significantly lower than those in the mirabegron group (p < 0.05). The incidence of drug-related adverse events between two groups was similar, and there was no statistically significant difference (p > 0.05). With respect to secondary variables, the OAB-q HRQol score in the combination group was statistically superior in comparison with that in the mirabegron group between the 2nd week and the 4th week (p < 0.05). This was consistent with the primary outcome. Meanwhile, from the second to fourth week, the OAB-q symptom bother score and OABSS in the combination group were both lower than in the mirabegron group (p < 0.05). Combination therapy of PFMS and mirabegron demonstrated significant improvements over mirabegron monotherapy in reducing refractory OAB symptoms for female patients, and providing a higher quality of life without increasing bothersome adverse effects. https://www.chictr.org.cn/, ChiCTR-INR-22013524.

Efficacy and safety of selumetinib in patients with neurofibromatosis type 1 and inoperable plexiform neurofibromas: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

The approval of selumetinib in patients with neurofibromatosis type 1(NF1) and inoperable plexiform neurofibromas (PN) has reshaped the landscape of clinical management of the disease, and further comprehensive evaluation of the drug's efficacy and safety is needed. Original articles reporting on the efficacy and safety of elumetinib in patients with NF1 were comprehensively searched in the Pubmed database, Embase database, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science database and screened for inclusion of studies that met the criteria. We pooled the objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), disease progression rate (DPR), and the rate of improvement in PN-related complications using meta-analysis. The incidence of drug-related adverse events was also statistically analyzed. This study included 10 clinical trials involving 268 patients. The pooled ORR was 68.0% (95% CI 58.0-77.3%), the DCR was 96.8% (95% CI 90.8-99.7%) and the DPR was only 1.4% (95% CI 0-4.3%). The pooled improvement rate was 75.3% (95% CI 56.2-90.9%) for pain and 77.8% (95% CI 63.1-92.5%) for motor disorders. Most adverse events were mild, with the most common being gastrointestinal reactions (diarrhea: 62.5%; vomiting: 54.5%). Our study demonstrates that selumetinib is effective in patients with NF1 and PN, significantly improving the serious complications associated with PN as well as having tolerable toxicities. Our findings help to increase clinicians' confidence in applying selumetinib and promote the clinical adoption and benefit of the new drug.

Effect of esketamine combined with pregabalin on acute postsurgical pain in patients who underwent resection of spinal neoplasms: a randomized controlled trial.

Moderate-to-severe acute postsurgical pain (APSP) can prolong the recovery and worsen the prognosis of patients who undergo spinal surgery. Esketamine and pregabalin may resolve APSP without causing hyperpathia or respiratory depression after surgery. However, there are other risks, such as dissociative symptoms. We designed a randomized controlled trial to investigate the effect of the combination of these 2 drugs on the incidence of APSP in patients who underwent resection of spinal neoplasms. Patients aged 18 to 65 years were randomized to receive esketamine (a bolus dose of 0.5 mg·kg-1 and an infusion dose of 0.12 mg·kg-1·h-1 for 48 hours after surgery) combined with oral pregabalin (75-150 mg/day, starting 2 hours before surgery and ending at 2 weeks after surgery) or an identical volume of normal saline and placebo capsules. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with moderate-to-severe APSP (visual analog scale score ≥ 40) during the first 48 hours after surgery. Secondary outcomes included the incidence of drug-related adverse events. A total of 90 patients were randomized. The incidence of moderate-to-severe APSP in the combined group (27.3%) was lower than that in the control group (60.5%) during the first 48 hours after surgery (odds ratio = 0.25, 95% CI = 0.10-0.61; P = 0.002). The occurrence of mild dissociative symptoms was higher in the combined group than in the control group (18.2% vs 0%). In conclusion, esketamine combined with pregabalin could effectively alleviate APSP after spinal surgery, but an analgesic strategy might increase the risk of mild dissociative symptoms.

Different doses of nalmefene combined with hydromorphone hydrochloride for postoperative analgesia after colorectal surgery: a randomized controlled study

BackgroundHydromorphone hydrochloride has a satisfactory postoperative analgesic effect for patients with colorectal cancer but is accompanied by a relatively high incidence of adverse events. Low-doses of naloxone combined with opioids for patient-controlled analgesia can reduce the incidence of drug-related adverse events. Nalmefene is a more selective opioid receptor antagonist than naloxone. The aim of this study was to determine the impact of low-doses of nalmefene on the analgesic effect and incidence of adverse events of patients with hydromorphone patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) undergoing colorectal radical surgery.MethodsNinety-nine patients undergoing elective laparoscopic or hand-assisted laparoscopic radical surgery under general anaesthesia were randomly divided into three groups. Group N1 received hydromorphone hydrochloride 0.15 mg/kg + nalmefene 2 µg/kg; Group N2 received hydromorphone hydrochloride 0.15 mg/kg + nalmefene 0.5 µg/kg; and the control group (Group C) received hydromorphone hydrochloride 0.15 mg/kg. All medications were diluted to 100 ml with normal saline. The primary outcome was pain intensity at 12 h after surgery; the secondary outcomes were the occurrence of nausea, vomiting and pruritus and the total analgesic consumption of the PCA pump at 1 h, 6 h, 12 h, 24 and 48 h after surgery.ResultsThe NRS scores of Group N1 (2 µg/kg) were significantly lower than those of Group C (P = 0.025), and no difference was found between group N2 and group C (P > 0.05). Among the three groups, the NRS scores of Group N1 (2 µg/kg) were significantly lower than those of Group C at 12 h (P = 0.01) and 48 h (P = 0.01) postoperatively. Compared with 12 h postoperatively, the NRS scores were lower at 24 h postoperatively in Group N1 and Group C (P < 0.05) and significantly lower at 48 h postoperatively in all three groups (P < 0.001). There was a significant difference in the incidence of pruritus among the three groups (P = 0.036).ConclusionsNalmefene at a dosage of 2 µg/kg enhances the postoperative analgesic effect of hydromorphone hydrochloride and reduces the occurrence of postoperative pruritus.Trial RegistrationThe trial was registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (Registration number: ChiCTR2000033520, date: 03/06/2020).

Comparison of pharmacokinetics and safety between CE-fosphenytoin sodium, fosphenytoin sodium, and phenytoin sodium after intravenous and intramuscular administration in healthy volunteers.

Background: Captisol®-enabled-fosphenytoin sodium (CE-fosphenytoin sodium) injection is a modified formulation of fosphenytoin sodium. Objective: We aim to compare the intravenous and intramuscular bioavailability and safety between CE-fosphenytoin sodium, fosphenytoin sodium (Cerebyx®), and phenytoin sodium (intravenous injection only). Methods: In pivotal study 1, 54 subjects were divided into three sequence groups that receive intravenous injection of 250mg of phenytoin sodium equivalent (PE), CE-fosphenytoin sodium (T), or fosphenytoin sodium (R1) and 250mg of phenytoin sodium (R2) in period 1. After a 14-day washout period, 36 subjects were randomized to two treatment sequence groups (T-R1 or R1-T, n = 18 per group) in period 2, in which the subjects who received R2 in period 1 were removed, those who received T in period 1 used R1 (T-R1), while those who previously received R1 used T (R1-T). In pivotal study 2, a single intramuscular dose of T (400mg PE) or R1 (400mg PE) was administered according to the individual sequential treatment assignment in each period. There was a washout (14days) period before receiving the next period study drug. Results: T and R1 have similar pharmacokinetic characteristics regarding total and free phenytoin, showing bioequivalence of both drugs in the intravenous and intramuscular administration. The geometric mean ratio was close to 1 (0.98-1.06). The AUC of total and free phenytoin in subjects who intravenously received T and R1 was very similar to those who received R2, although their Cmax was lower than that of the subjects who received R2. Overall, treatment with T and R1 was safe and well-tolerated, without serious adverse events (SAEs) or grade III adverse events (AEs). With intravenous (i.v.) or intramuscular (i.m.) treatment, the incidence of drug-related AEs using T was similar to that using R1. Treatment with T and R1 had clearly superior tolerability than that with R2. Conclusion: CE-fosphenytoin sodium is a promising substitute for fosphenytoin sodium. Clinical Trial Registration: http://www.chinadrugtrials.org.cn/, CTR20202154 (11 November 2020).

Efficacy, Safety, and Durability of Brolucizumab: An 8-Month Post-Marketing Surveillance Analysis.

Brolucizumab (Beovu®) is an anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agent approved for the treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nvAMD). Brolucizumab was marketed for its noninferiority to aflibercept and its potential for greater durability. However, post-marketing utilization has been tempered by safety concerns. We evaluate the visual and anatomic efficacy of brolucizumab, examine changes in treatment intervals after switching to brolucizumab, and estimate the incidence of drug-related adverse events in the real world. This was a retrospective consecutive case series of 626 eyes (543 patients) with nvAMD treated with 1438 brolucizumab injections at a single retina practice between 10/1/2019 and 5/15/2020. Changes in visual acuity (VA); anatomic outcomes assessed by optical coherence tomography (OCT) including central subfield thickness (CST), macular volume (MV), presence of intraretinal fluid (IRF), subretinal fluid (SRF), and serous pigment epithelial detachment (sPED) on foveal line scans; treatment intervals before and after receiving brolucizumab; and the incidence of brolucizumab-related adverse events. The majority of eyes (N = 531, 89.7%) had received prior anti-VEGF therapy with aflibercept, ranibizumab, and/or bevacizumab. VA improved in treatment-naïve eyes (+3.7 letters, p = 0.04), and was maintained in previously treated eyes. There were significant improvements in all anatomic outcomes in both groups (p < 0.001). We observed a 4.8% incidence of intraocular inflammation (IOI) and a 0.6% incidence of retinal vasculitis. The average treatment interval increased from 6.3 to 6.8 weeks (p = 0.001). Brolucizumab treatment was associated with VA improvement in naïve eyes and maintenance of VA in previously treated eyes. Switching to brolucizumab was associated with improved anatomic outcomes and extended treatment intervals in most eyes. We observed a similar incidence of IOI and a lower incidence of retinal vasculitis compared to the Safety Review Committee's analysis of HAWK and HARRIER.

Efficacy and safety of combined Chinese and Western medicine in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis: a prospective, multicenter cohort study.

Purpose: To conduct a real-world evaluation of the efficacy and safety of combined Chinese and Western medicine in treating knee osteoarthritis (KOA). Methods: A multicenter, prospective cohort study design was employed, enrolling 450 KOA patients (Kellgren-Lawrence score of 3 or less). The patients were divided into a Western medicine treatment group (WM group) and a combined Western and traditional Chinese medicine treatment group (WM-CM group). A 6-week treatment plan was administered, and follow-up visits occurred at 2weeks, 4weeks, and 6weeks after initiating treatment. The primary outcome indicator was the total Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) score after 6weeks of treatment. Secondary outcome indicators included WOMAC subscales for pain, stiffness, and joint function, visual analogue scale (VAS) score, physical component summary (PCS), mental component summary (MCS), and clinical effectiveness. The incidence of drug-related adverse events was used as a safety evaluation indicator. Results: A total of 419 patients were included in the final analysis: 98 in the WM group and 321 in the WM-CM group. The baseline characteristics of the two groups were comparable, except for the incidence of stiffness symptoms and stiffness scores. After 6weeks of treatment, the WM-CM group exhibited superior results to the WM group in improving the total WOMAC score (24.71 ± 1.38 vs. 16.36 ± 0.62, p < 0.001). The WM-CM group also outperformed the WM group in WOMAC pain and joint function scores, VAS score, PCS score, MCS score, and clinical effectiveness (p < 0.05), which was consistent with the findings of the main evaluation index. Subgroup analysis indicated that the combined Chinese and Western medicine treatment showed more pronounced benefits in patients under 65years of age and in those with a Kellgren-Lawrence (K-L) classification of 0-I. Throughout the study, no adverse effects were observed in either group. Conclusion: The combination of Chinese and Western medicine demonstrated superiority over Western medicine alone in relieving knee pain symptoms, improving knee function, and enhancing the quality of life for KOA patients with a K-L score of 3 or less. Moreover, the treatment exhibited a good safety profile. Clinical Trial Registration: (https://www.chictr.org.cn/), identifier (ChiCTR1900027175).

Efficacy and safety of an extended-release sebacoyl dinalbuphine ester for laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A randomized controlled trial.

A long-acting κreceptor agonist parenteral analgesic may theoretically improve acute pain and reduce incidence of chronic postsurgical pain (CPSP) after laparoscopic cholecystectomy with minimal drug-related side effects of the traditional μreceptor opioids. Eighty adult patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy were randomly assigned to receive single intramuscular injection of an extended-release sebacoyl dinalbuphine ester (SDE, Naldebain 150 mg; n = 40) or placebo (n = 40) after anesthesia induction. Standard multimodal analgesia (MMA) was administered for postoperative pain control. The primary endpoint was pain intensity within 7 days after surgery. The secondary endpoints were incidence CPSP at 3 months and adverse reactions up to 7 days after surgery. The highest visual analogue scale (VAS) and area under the curve of VAS 0 to 48 hours after operation were not different between the two groups and a similar proportion of patients requested rescue parenteral analgesics. Average pain intensities were also not different at 72 hours and 7 days after surgery. Incidence of CPSP was 22.5% and 13.1% in patients who received placebo and SDE treatment, respectively (P = .379). Significantly higher incidence of drug-related adverse events, including dizziness, nausea and injection site reactions, were recorded in the SDE group. A single dose of extended-release analgesic SDE given intraoperatively did not provide sufficient add-on effect for acute and chronic pain management after laparoscopic cholecystectomies in patients who received standard postoperative MMA. Intramuscular injection of 150 mg SDE in patients with average body mass causes adverse events that could have been overlooked. More clinical studies are warranted to determine the target populations who may benefit from SDE injections for improvement of acute and chronic postsurgical pain management.

Clinical efficacy and safety of regorafenib for patients with recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma after hepatectomy: A real-world study in China.

e16119 Background: The therapeutic strategy for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after hepatectomy is limited. There is a significantly unmet clinical need for effective treatment options for these patients. This study aimed to assess the clinical efficacy and safety of regorafenib alone or combined with a PD-1 inhibitor as a second or further-line treatment for patients with recurrent HCC after hepatectomy. Methods: Patients receiving regorafenib alone or combined with a PD-1 inhibitor in Peking University People’s Hospital from January 2019 to November 2022 were entered prospectively into a clinical database. Data were retrospectively analyzed. The major inclusion criteria were: histologically confirmed diagnosis of HCC; disease recurrence after radical hepatectomy; with tumor that cannot be re-resected; ECOG performance status score (PS) ≤2. Regorafenib was administered at the daily dose of 80-120 mg for more than 4 weeks. Progression-free survival (PFS) was the primary endpoint. The second outcomes included PFS, objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and the incidence of drug-related adverse events (AEs). CTCAE v5.0 was used for evaluation of AEs. Results: Twenty-two patients were enrolled with a median age of 59. The hepatic function of all patients was mildly impaired (Child-Pugh A). Among all patients, 36.35% of cases were enrolled in Barcelona Clinic Liver Clinic (BCLC) A and the remainder were in BCLC B. Eight cases (36.36%) received regorafenib in combination with PD-1 inhibitor therapy and 14 cases received regorafenib treatment alone. Among all patients, 86.36% of the cases were treated with regorafenib as second-line therapy. Five patients (22.73%) had extrahepatic metastasis. The median PFS and overall survival (OS) were 11.66 (±10.20) months and 16.92 (±10.21) months, respectively. The 3-month PFS rate was 100%. The 6-month and 12-month PFS rates were 75% (95%CI: 58.49%-96.70%) and 53.33% (95%CI: 34.88%-81.50%), respectively. The results showed a significant difference in median PFS between patients receiving regorafenib as second-line therapy and third-line therapy [12.30 months (95%CI: 4.25-20.36) vs 4.30 months (95%CI: 3.50-5.10); P&lt;0.001]. In addition, there is a significant difference in median PFS between patients with extrahepatic metastasis and those without extrahepatic metastasis [5.20 months (95%CI: 3.48-6.92) vs 18.20 months (95%CI: 5.09-31.31; P=0.003)]. The ORR and DCR were 18.18% and 81.82%. The most frequent AEs were hand-foot syndrome (40.91%), pain (18.18%), diarrhea (13.64%), and hypertension (13.64%). Most AEs were grade 1 or 2, with only 1 case having grade 3 AE. Conclusions: Regorafenib alone or combined with a PD-1 inhibitor showed significant clinical efficacy in controlling the disease progression of recurrent HCC.

Esketamine combined with pregabalin on acute postoperative pain in patients undergoing resection of spinal neoplasms: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

BackgroundPerioperative pain management is one of the most challenging issues for patients with spinal neoplasms. Inadequate postoperative analgesia usually leads to severe postsurgical pain, which could cause patients to suffer from many other related complications. Meanwhile, there is no appropriate analgesic strategy for patients with spinal neoplasms.Methods/designThis is a protocol for a randomized double-blind controlled trial to evaluate the effect of esketamine combined with pregabalin on postsurgical pain in spinal surgery. Patients aged 18 to 65 years scheduled for spinal neoplasm resection will be randomly allocated into the combined and control groups in a 1:1 ratio. In the combined group, esketamine will be given during the during the surgery procedure until 48-h postoperative period, and pregabalin will be taken from 2 h before the surgery to 2 weeks postoperatively. The control group will receive normal saline and placebo capsules at the same time points. Both groups received a background analgesic regimen by using patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (containing 100 μg sufentanil and 16 mg ondansetron) until 2 days after surgery. To ensure the accuracy and reliability of this trial, all the researchers and patients will be blinded until the completion of this study. The primary outcome will be the proportion of patients with acute moderate-to-severe postsurgical pain (visual analog scale, VAS ≥ 40, range: 0–100, with 0, no pain; 100, the worst pain) during the 48-h postoperative period. The secondary outcomes will include the maximal VAS scores (when the patients felt the most intense pain over the last 24 h before being interviewed) at 0–2 h, 2–24 h, 24–48 h, and 48–72 h after leaving the operating room and 24 h before discharge; the incidence of acute moderate-to-severe postsurgical pain at each other time point; chronic postsurgical pain assessment; neuropathic pain assessment; and the incidence of drug-related adverse events and other postoperative complications, such as postoperative delirium and postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV).DiscussionThe aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of esketamine combined with pregabalin on acute postsurgical pain in patients undergoing resection of spinal neoplasms. The safety of this perioperative pain management strategy will also be examined.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT05096468. Registered on October 27, 2021

Effectiveness of Yishen Tongbi decoction versus methotrexate in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: A double-blind, randomized, controlled, non-inferiority trial

Yishen Tongbi decoction (YSTB) which is an herbal formula, has been used for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) for more than ten years with a better curative effect. Methotrexate (MTX) is an effective anchoring agent used to treat rheumatoid arthritis. There were, however, no head-to-head comparative randomized controlled trials comparing traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) to MTX, Therefore, we performed this double-blind, double-model, randomized controlled trial of the efficacy and safety of YSTB and MTX in the treatment of active RA for 24 weeks. Patients who met the enrollment criteria were randomly selected (1:1) to receive either YSTB therapy (YSTB 150 ml once daily+MTX placebo 7.5-15mg once weekly) or MTX therapy (MTX 7.5-15mg once weekly+YSTB placebo 150 ml once daily) in treatment cycles lasting 24 weeks. The percentage of patients who achieve a clinical disease activity index (CDAI) response at week 24 is the primary efficacy outcome. A 10% risk differential non-inferiority margin was previously defined. The Chinese Clinical Trials Registry has recorded this trial (ChiCTR-1,900,024,902, registered on August 3rd 2019, http://www.chictr.org.cn/index.aspx). Out of 118 patients whose eligibility was determined from September 2019 to May 2022, 100 patients (n = 50 for each group) were enrolled in the research overall. The 24-week trial was completed by 82% (40/49) of the YSTB group's patients and 86% (42/49) of the MTX group's patients. In the intention-to-treat analysis, 67.4% (33/49) of patients in the YSTB group met the main outcome of CDAI response criteria at week 24, compared to 57.1% (28/49) in the MTX group. The risk difference was 0.102 (95% CI -0.089 to 0.293), which demonstrated the non-inferiority of YSTB to MTX. After further testing for superiority, the ratio of CDAI responses achieved by the YSTB and MTX groups was not statistically significant (p=0.298). At the same time, in week 24, secondary outcomes such as the ACR 20/50/70 response, the European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology good or moderate response, remission rate, simplified disease activity index response, and low disease activity rate all showed similar statistically significant patterns. There was statistically significant attainment of ACR20 (p = 0.008) and EULAR good or moderate response (p = 0.009) in two groups at week 4. The intention-to-treat analysis results and the per-protocol analysis results were in agreement. The incidence of drug-related adverse events was not statistically different between the two groups (p = 0.487). Previous studies have used TCM as an adjunct to conventional therapy, and few of them have directly compared it with MTX. In order to lessen disease activity in RA patients, this trial demonstrated that YSTB compound monotherapy was non-inferior to MTX monotherapy and had superior efficacy following short-term treatment. This study provided evidence-based medicine in the treatment of RA with compound prescriptions of TCM and contributed to promoting phytomedicine use in RA patients.

Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of Anti-C5a Antibody BDB-001 for Severe COVID-19: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Phase 1 Clinical Trial in Healthy Chinese Adults.

Severe Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) progresses with inflammation and coagulation, due to an overactive complement system. Complement component 5a (C5a) plays a key role in the complement system to trigger a powerful "cytokine and chemokine storm" in viral infection. BDB-001, a recombinant human immunoglobulin G4 (IgG4) that specially binds to C5a, has the potential to inhibit the C5a-triggered cytokine storm in treating COVID-19 patients and other inflammation diseases. Here, we have explored its safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics in healthy adults. This trial is registered with http://www.chinadrugtrials.org.cn/(CTR20200429 ). Thirty-two enrolled participants were randomized into three single-dose cohorts (2, 4, and 8mg/kg) and 1 multi-dose cohort (4mg/kg), and received either BDB-001 or placebo (3:1) double-blindly. The safety and tolerability after administration were evaluated for 21days for single-dose cohorts and 28days for the multi-dose cohort. The pharmacokinetics of BDB-001 in plasma and pharmacodynamics as free C5a in plasma were analyzed. The incidence of drug-related adverse events (AEs) was low, and all AEs were mild or moderate: neither AEs≥3 (NCI-Common Terminology Criteria For Adverse Events, CTCAE 5.0) nor serious adverse events (SAEs) were found. The area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to 480h (AUC0-480h), that from time zero to infinity (AUCinf), and peak plasma concentration ©max) increased dose-dependently from 2 to 8mg/kg in the single-dose cohorts and were characterized by a nonlinear pharmacokinetics of target-mediated drug disposal (TMDD). The accumulation index by AUC0-tau after five administrations (4mg/kg) from the multi-dose cohort was 6.42, suggesting an accumulation effect. Furthermore, inhibition of C5a at the plasma level was observed. The results of this phase I study supported that BDB-001 is a potent anti-C5a inhibitor with safety, tolerability, and no immunogenicity. TRIALREGISTRATION NUMBER: CTR20200429.

Efficacy and safety of Ciprofol for procedural sedation and anesthesia in non-operating room settings

Study objectiveCiprofol, a novel intravenous anesthetic, provides rapid recovery in patients undergoing colonoscopy. We aimed to examine the efficacy and safety of ciprofol in comparison with propofol for sedation or anesthesia in non-operating room settings including endoscopic submucosal dissection, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, and flexible bronchoscopy (FB). DesignProspective, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group clinical trial. SettingUniversity-affiliated teaching hospital. PatientsWe recruited 207 patients scheduled for an endoscopic procedure from October 2021 to December 2021. InterventionsPatients were randomized into three groups according to the dose during induction (n = 69 each): 1) ciprofol 6 mg/kg/h, 2) ciprofol 8 mg/kg/h, or 3) propofol 40 mg/kg/h. Ciprofol or propofol was administered throughout the procedure. MeasurementsThe primary outcome was the success rate of sedation or anesthesia for the procedures. Secondary outcomes included induction time, endoscope insertion time, recovery time, discharge time, incidence of drug-related adverse events (AEs), neurological and inflammatory outcomes. Main resultsThe procedure success rates in the three groups were 100%. The induction time in the 6 (3.3 ± 1.0 min) and 8 mg/kg/h (2.9 ± 0.6 min) ciprofol groups was longer than that in the propofol group (2.5 ± 0.6 min) only in patients undergoing FB (p = 0.004). The time for patients to be fully alert and discharged from the post-anesthesia care unit was comparable across the three groups (p > 0.05). The incidence of drug-related AEs in the propofol and 6 and 8 mg/kg/h ciprofol groups was 84.1%, 76.8%, and 79.7%. No pain on injection was reported by ciprofol groups. Neurological outcomes and inflammatory responses were comparable among the three groups. ConclusionsCiprofol induced a level of sedation or anesthesia equivalent to that induced by propofol in non-operating room settings except for a prolonged induction time in patients undergoing FB. Ciprofol had a safety profile similar to that of propofol. No pain on injection was reported by ciprofol.

Efficacy and safety of combination of mirabegron and solifenacin in patients with double-J stent related overactive bladder: a prospective study

To observe the efficacy and safety of solifenacin and/or mirabegron as a medical expulsive therapy (MET) in patients with double-J stent-related overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms. A total of 219 patients with double-J stent-related OAB symptoms were prospectively randomized into two groups. One-hundred and nine cases in the combination group accepted mirabegron and solifenacin therapy and 110 cases as control only accepted solifenacin therapy. The lower urinary tract symptoms and overactive bladder questionnaire (OAB-q) health-related quality of life (HRQol) and symptom bother score between two groups were compared at the 1st, 2nd and 4th week ends. All of 219 patients were randomly assigned to two groups, of which 109 patients were included in the combination group and 110 in the solifenacin group. The incidences of LUTS, including urgency, frequent urination, and incontinence episodes, in the 2nd week (44.9% vs. 64.5%, P = 0.028; 48.6% vs. 62.7%, P = 0.036; and 40.4% vs. 56.4%, P = 0.018) and the 4th week (14.7% vs. 30.9%, P = 0.004; 16.5% vs. 33.6%, P = 0.003; and 11.9% vs. 26.4%, P = 0.007) after combination treatment were significantly lower than those in the solifenacin group. The incidence of drug-related adverse events in the solifenacin group was higher than that in the combination group, but there was no statistically significant difference (P > 0.05). In terms of secondary variables, the OAB-q HRQol score in the combination group was statistically superior in comparison with that in the solifenacin group between the second and fourth week (77.9 vs. 76.4, P = 0.020; and 87.9 vs. 85.6, P = 0.001). The OAB-q symptom bother score was higher in the solifenacin group than in the combination group (37.6 vs. 36.4, P = 0.016; and 26.2 vs. 24.8, P = 0.003). Combination therapy of solifenacin and mirabegron demonstrated significant improvements over solifenacin monotherapy in reducing OAB symptoms associated with double-J stents, and providing a higher quality of life without increasing bothersome adverse effects.

CLINICAL ASSESSMENT OF PHARMACOKINETICS AND SAFETY OF NOVEL GLYCINE STABILIZED 10% IVIG IN PIDD PATIENTS

<h3>Introduction</h3> This study aimed to evaluate the safety and pharmacokinetics (PK) of a novel glycine stabilized 10% immunoglobulin preparation for intravenous (IV) administration in patients with primary immunodeficiency disease (PIDD). <h3>Methods</h3> Phase III, open-label, prospective, multi-center study. The primary endpoint of the study was the incidence rate of acute serious bacterial infections (ASBIs) per patient-year. Forty-seven patients across 11 US sites received 200 to 800 mg/kg IVIg every 21 or 28 days for 48 weeks. The experimental IVIg had an average of 6 μg/ml IgA content. Additional end points included IgG trough levels, all infections other than ASBIs, hospitalization for any reason, and incidence of drug-related adverse events. <h3>Results</h3> No patients in the study had an ASBI. IgG trough levels were maintained well above the level of 600 mg/dL throughout the study in all patients except for one. The incidence rate of any infection other than ASBI was 2.0. Four patients were hospitalized during the study not attributed to an infection or the study drug. Twenty-two patients (46.8%) reported 75 drug-related AEs. The most frequently reported (≥ 5%) drug-related AEs were headache in 12 patients (25.5%), infusion-related reaction in 5 patients (10.6%), nausea, fatigue and Coombs direct test positive in 4 patients (8.5%) each. There were no cases of thrombosis. No AEs led to study discontinuation and no patients died during the study due to AE. <h3>Conclusion</h3> The novel glycine stabilized 10% IVIg is highly efficacious for treatment of PIDD with no serious infections, low overall infections, and no adverse event related study discontinuation.

A randomized, double-blind, parallel control study to evaluate the biosimilarity of QL1209 with Perjeta® in healthy male subjects.

Purpose: This is the first study to compare the pharmacokinetics, safety and, immunogenicity of QL1209, a biosimilar of Perjeta®. Methods: This study was a randomized, double-blind, parallel-controlled clinical trial evaluating the biosimilarity between QL1209 (specification: 420 mg:14 ml, single use via, manufacturer: Qilu Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., batch number: 201808001KJL) and Perjeta® (specification: 420 mg: 14 ml, single use via, manufacturer: Roche Pharma AG, batch number: H0309H02). The trial period was 99 days (blood samples for PK were collected 99 days after infusion). Serum concentrations were determined using a validated assay. PK parameters were calculated using a non-compartmental model and analyzed statistically. Anti-drug antibody (ADA)-positive samples were further tested for the presence of neutralization antibody detection (NAb). Results: A total of 137 healthy subjects were administrated. The subjects were randomized 1:1 to receive QL1209 or Perjeta® 420 mg intravenously. The geometric mean ratio (GMRs) for QL1209 versus Perjeta® are 104.14%, 104.09%, and 110.59% for Cmax, AUC0-t, and AUC0-∞, respectively, and their 90% confidence interval (CIs) all fell within the predefined bioequivalence margin 80.00–125%. The incidence of drug-related adverse events was 95.6% and 95.5% in the QL1209 and Perjeta® groups, respectively, also comparable between the two groups. Conclusion: The results of this comparative clinical pharmacology study demonstrated the PK similarity of QL1209 (420 mg: 14 ml) and Perjeta® (420 mg: 14 ml) and there was no significant difference in safety and immunogenicity between QL1209 and Perjeta® manufactured by Roche Pharma AG.

Insights into the Pharmacogenetics of Tacrolimus Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics.

The influence of pharmacogenetics in tacrolimus pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics needs further investigation, considering its potential in assisting clinicians to predict the optimal starting dosage and the need for a personalized adjustment of the dose, as well as to identify patients at a high risk of rejection, drug-related adverse effects, or poor outcomes. In the past decade, new pharmacokinetic strategies have been developed to improve personalized tacrolimus treatment. Several studies have shown that patients with tacrolimus doses C0/D < 1 ng/mL/mg may demonstrate a greater incidence of drug-related adverse events and infections. In addition, C0 tacrolimus intrapatient variability (IPV) has been identified as a potential biomarker to predict poor outcomes related to drug over- and under-exposure. With regard to tacrolimus pharmacodynamics, inconsistent genotype-phenotype relationships have been identified. The aim of this review is to provide a concise summary of currently available data regarding the influence of pharmacogenetics on the clinical outcome of patients with high intrapatient variability and/or a fast metabolizer phenotype. Moreover, the role of membrane transporters in the interindividual variability of responses to tacrolimus is critically discussed from a transporter scientist’s perspective. Indeed, the relationship between transporter polymorphisms and intracellular tacrolimus concentrations will help to elucidate the interplay between the biological mechanisms underlying genetic variations impacting drug concentrations and clinical effects.

The efficacy and safety of keverprazan, a novel potassium-competitive acid blocker, in treating erosive oesophagitis: a phase III, randomised, double-blind multicentre study.

Keverprazan is a novel potassium-competitive acid blocker (P-CAB) with a strong acid-suppressive capacity that may provide clinical benefit in acid-related diseases. This study aimed to explore the non-inferior efficacy and safety of keverprazan to lansoprazole in treating erosive oesophagitis (EO). This was a phase III, randomised, double-blind multicentre study. Patients were randomised to receive keverprazan 20 mg once daily or lansoprazole 30 mg once daily for 4-8 weeks. EO healing rates and adverse events (AEs) were compared between the keverprazan group and the lansoprazole group. A total of 238 patients comprised the full analysis set (FAS) while 221 patients comprised the per-protocol set (PPS). For FAS analysis, the EO healing rates at week 8 were 95.8% (114/119) and 89.9% (107/119) for keverprazan and lansoprazole respectively. For PPS analysis, the EO healing rates at week 8 were 99.1% (110/111) and 92.7% (102/110) for keverprazan and lansoprazole respectively. Non-inferiority of keverprazan compared with lansoprazole according to EO healing rates at 8 weeks was demonstrated in both FAS (difference: 5.8% [95% CI: -0.6% to 12.3%]; p= 0.081) and PPS (difference: 6.1% [95% CI: 1.1%-11.2%]; p= 0.018) analysis. Drug-related AEs were reported in 34.5% (41/119) patients of the keverprazan group and 25.2% (30/119) patients of the lansoprazole group with no significant difference (p= 0.156). No severe AE happened in the keverprazan group. This study demonstrated the non-inferior efficacy of keverprazan to lansoprazole in treating EO. The incidences of drug-related AEs were comparable between keverprazan and lansoprazole.

Trastuzumab Deruxtecan versus Trastuzumab Emtansine for Breast Cancer

BackgroundTrastuzumab emtansine is the current standard treatment for patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)–positive metastatic breast cancer whose disease progresses after treatment with a combination of anti-HER2 antibodies and a taxane.MethodsWe conducted a phase 3, multicenter, open-label, randomized trial to compare the efficacy and safety of trastuzumab deruxtecan (a HER2 antibody–drug conjugate) with those of trastuzumab emtansine in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer previously treated with trastuzumab and a taxane. The primary end point was progression-free survival (as determined by blinded independent central review); secondary end points included overall survival, objective response, and safety.ResultsAmong 524 randomly assigned patients, the percentage of those who were alive without disease progression at 12 months was 75.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 69.8 to 80.7) with trastuzumab deruxtecan and 34.1% (95% CI, 27.7 to 40.5) with trastuzumab emtansine (hazard ratio for progression or death from any cause, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.22 to 0.37; P<0.001). The percentage of patients who were alive at 12 months was 94.1% (95% CI, 90.3 to 96.4) with trastuzumab deruxtecan and 85.9% (95% CI, 80.9 to 89.7) with trastuzumab emtansine (hazard ratio for death, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.36 to 0.86; prespecified significance boundary not reached). An overall response (a complete or partial response) occurred in 79.7% (95% CI, 74.3 to 84.4) of the patients who received trastuzumab deruxtecan and in 34.2% (95% CI, 28.5 to 40.3) of those who received trastuzumab emtansine. The incidence of drug-related adverse events of any grade was 98.1% with trastuzumab deruxtecan and 86.6% with trastuzumab emtansine, and the incidence of drug-related adverse events of grade 3 or 4 was 45.1% and 39.8%, respectively. Adjudicated drug-related interstitial lung disease or pneumonitis occurred in 10.5% of the patients in the trastuzumab deruxtecan group and in 1.9% of those in the trastuzumab emtansine group; none of these events were of grade 4 or 5.ConclusionsAmong patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer previously treated with trastuzumab and a taxane, the risk of disease progression or death was lower among those who received trastuzumab deruxtecan than among those who received trastuzumab emtansine. Treatment with trastuzumab deruxtecan was associated with interstitial lung disease and pneumonitis. (Funded by Daiichi Sankyo and AstraZeneca; DESTINY-Breast03 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03529110.)

ED50 and ED95 of propofol combined with different doses of esketamine for children undergoing upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: A prospective dose-finding study using up-and-down sequential allocation method.

Propofol and esketamine are routine anaesthetics used in sedation or general anaesthesia for paediatric procedures. Coadministration could reduce the dose of either propofol or esketamine required and lower the incidence of drug-related adverse events. We designed a four-arm randomized controlled trial in children undergoing diagnostic upper gastrointestinal endoscopy to investigate the dose of propofol with different doses of esketamine inducing appropriate depth of anaesthesia in 50% patients (median effective dose, ED50 ). After getting the approval of the research ethics committee and informed consent, 92 paediatric patients planning for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy were divided into four groups randomly: esketamine 0, 0.25, 0.5 and 1mg/kg groups (n=23/group). Propofol doses followed the Dixon and Massey up-and-down method with different starting and interval doses between groups. During the first attempt of endoscope insertion, if patients' reactions prevented the insertion, it would be considered as a failure. The awakening time, total propofol doses, as well as the perioperative and post-procedure adverse events were evaluated and recorded for each patient. The ED50 (median, 95% confidence interval) of propofol was significantly greater in esketamine 0 and 0.25mg/kg groups in comparison with the esketamine 0.5 and 1mg/kg groups (4.1 [3.3-4.9]; 3.1 [2.5-3.8] mg/kg vs. 1.8 [1.1-2.4]; 0.8 [0.2-1.3] mg/kg, respectively, p<.05). The total doses of propofol in esketamine 0.5 and 1mg/kg groups were statistically lower than these in esketamine 0 and 0.25mg/kg group (p<.01). The mean blood pressure was lower in the esketamine 0mg/kg group than that in 1mg/kg group after administration and during the procedure (p<.01). The esketamine 1mg/kg group showed a higher incidence of vomiting and visual disturbances than the other three groups (p<.001). In children who accomplished diagnostic paediatric upper gastrointestinal endoscopy under deep sedation/anaesthesia, the total dosage of propofol needed was reduced significantly in esketamine 0.5 and 1mg/kg groups with a corresponding reduce in propofol-related hemodynamic changes. However, a higher incidence of esketamine-related adverse effects was found in esketamine 1mg/kg group.