Incidence Of Delayed Graft Function Research Articles

Does Severity of Donor Acute Kidney Injury Influence Outcomes Following Kidney Transplantation?

The study purpose was to review retrospectively our single-center experience transplanting kidneys from deceased donors (DD) with acute kidney injury (AKI) according to terminal serum creatinine (tSCr) level. AKI kidneys were defined by a doubling of the DD's admission SCr and a tSCr ≥ 2.0mg/dL. From 1/07 to 11/21, we transplanted 236 AKI DD kidneys, including 100 with a tSCr ≥ 3.0mg/dL (high SCr AKI group, mean tSCr 4.2mg/dL), and the remaining 136 from DDs with a tSCr of 2.0-2.99mg/dL (lower SCr AKI group, mean tSCr 2.4mg/dL). These two AKI groups were compared to 996 concurrent control patients receiving DD kidneys with a tSCr < 1.0mg/dL. Mean follow-up was 69 months. Delayed graft function (DGF) rates were 51%versus 46%versus 29% (p < 0.0001), and 5-year patient and death-censored kidney graft survival rates were 96.8%versus 83.5%versus 82.2% (p=0.002) and 86.7%versus 77.8%versus 78.8% (p=0.18) in the high tSCr AKI versus lower tSCr AKI versus control groups, respectively. Despite a higher incidence of DGF, patients receiving kidneys from DDs with tSCr levels ≥3.0mg/dL have acceptable medium-term outcomes compared to either AKI DDs with a lower tSCr or DDs with a tSCr < 1.0mg/dL.

Ex Vivo Surgical Removal Versus Conservative Management of Small Asymptomatic Kidney Stones in Living Donors and Long-term Kidney Transplant Outcomes.

Donors with small asymptomatic kidney stones have been increasingly accepted because of organ shortages and advances in endoscopic urology. This study aims to evaluate and compare long-term living-donor kidney transplant outcomes following ex vivo surgical removal versus conservative management of donors' gifted asymptomatic stones. Between January 2007 and December 2021, 119 kidney transplant recipients received stone-bearing kidneys, divided into the removal group (N = 63) and observation group (N = 56). We evaluated posttransplant stone events, urinary infections, kidney function, delayed graft function, length of hospital stay, and survival outcomes. After a median follow-up of 75.5 mo, the removal group had a 10.9% lower absolute incidence of stone events (7/56 [12.5%] versus 1/63 [1.6%]; hazard ratio, 0.08; 95% confidence interval, 0.01-0.77) and a 14.3% lower absolute incidence of urinary infections (16/56 [28.6%] versus 9/63 [14.3%]; hazard ratio, 0.42; 95% confidence interval, 0.19-0.95) than the observation group. The removal group also showed superior kidney graft function. The 2 groups had comparable length of hospital stay (11.0 versus 12.0 d; P = 0.297) and exhibited similar delayed graft function incidence (1/56 [1.8%] versus 2/63 [3.2%]; P = 1.000) and urinary stricture incidence (1/56 [1.8%] versus 3/63 [4.8%]; P = 0.621). Graft survival (P = 0.350) and patient survival (P = 0.260) were comparable between 2 groups. Subgroup analyses in recipients who received kidneys with stones <4 mm also reported similar results. Ex vivo surgical removal might outperform conservative management for donors' gifted asymptomatic kidney stones, improving long-term transplant outcomes and reducing stone events without increasing perioperative complications, even for stones <4 mm.

Establishing targets for goal-directed anesthesia in renal transplantation: A cohort analysis of high-saliency surgical time courses

Delayed graft function (DGF) increases morbidity and mortality in kidney transplant recipients. Operative parameters, including hemodynamic manipulation through vasopressors and fluids, can impact perfusion to the newly transplanted kidney and influence DGF incidence. We analyzed intraoperative time-series data in 5-minute intervals from kidney transplant recipient operations (N = 545) in conjunction with pretransplant characteristics and postsurgical outcomes, including DGF incidence, 60-day creatinine, and graft survival. Of the operations, 127 DGF events were captured in our cohort from a single academic transplant center (57/278 donations after brainstem death [DBDs], 65/150 donations after circulatory/cardiac death [DCDs], 5/117 live donations). In multiple regression, postanastomosis hypotension defined as mean arterial pressure (MAP) <75 mmHg was a risk factor for DGF independent of conventional predictors of DGF in DCD and DBD kidneys. DCD recipients with DGF had lower average postanastomosis MAP (DGF: 80.1 ± 8.1 mmHg vs no DGF: 76.4 ± 6.7 mmHg, P = .004). Interaction analysis demonstrated above-average doses of vasopressors and crystalloids were associated with improved outcomes when used at MAPs ≤75 mmHg, but they were associated with increased DGF at MAPs >75 mmHg, suggesting that the incidence of DGF can be highly influenced by intraoperative hemodynamic controls. This analysis of surgical time courses has identified potential new strategies for goal-directed anesthesia in renal transplantation.

#1103 Delayed initiation or reduced initial dose of calcineurin-inhibitors for kidney transplant recipients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract Background and Aims Delayed graft function (DGF) is more common in donors after cardiac death, especially expanded criteria donors and those with longer cold ischaemia time, older or with an increased serum creatinine. There is no agreement on the optimal immunosuppressive approach in patients at increased risk of DGF, with strategies including a delayed introduction of calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) or initial low dose CNI. Our aim was to evaluate the benefits and harms of delayed initiation of CNI or reduced CNI dose as initial immunosuppression therapy for kidney transplant (KT) recipients at high risk of DGF. Method We searched the Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Register of Studies up to 07 March 2023 through contact with the Information Specialist using search terms relevant to this review. Studies in the Register are identified through searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE, conference proceedings, the International Clinical Trials Register (ICTRP) Search Portal, and ClinicalTrials.gov. We included all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs evaluating early vs delayed initiation of CNI or reduced vs standard initial dose of CNI in kidney transplant (KT) recipients at high risk of DGF. Three authors independently assessed study eligibility, and two assessed the risk of bias, certainty of evidence, extracted the data, and performed the analysis. Results were reported as risk ratios with 95% confidence intervals for dichotomous outcomes and as mean difference with 95% CI for continuous outcomes. Statistical analysis was performed using the random-effects model. Risk of bias was assessed with RoB2 and the certainty of the evidence according to GRADE methods. Results Thirteen studies were included (2386 randomized participants). Incidence of DGF (RR 1.09, 95% CI 0.89 to 1.32; I2 = 18%) and acute rejection (RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.72 to 1.33; I2 = 54%) were similar between early and delayed introduction of CNI, as well as between low vs standard dose of CNI (DGF: RR 1.16, 95% CI 0.90 to 1.50; I2 = 9%; acute rejection: RR 0.70, 95% CI 0.43 to 1.14; I2 = 58%). There were also no differences in secondary outcomes such as graft function, graft loss, risk of death, or infection. Conclusion In patients at high risk of DGF, the strategy of delaying CNI introduction or starting at a lower dose does not reduce the risk of DGF.

Effect of Pretransplant Dialysis Method and Vintage on Early Clinical Outcomes of Kidney Transplantation

Pre-transplantation dialysis duration and modality may affect patients' long-term (mortality and graft failure) and short-term (delayed graft function) outcomes after kidney transplantation. We aimed to assess the impact of the method and duration of dialysis therapy on the graft function in the first 6 months post-transplant. The analysis included 122 kidney transplant patients (109 from a deceased donor and 13 from a living donor). Before transplantation, 91 were on hemodialysis (HD), 19 were on peritoneal dialysis (PD), and 9 received preemptive transplants. The incidence of delayed graft function (DGF) and creatinine levels at discharge and 6 months after transplantation were assessed. PD and HD patients did not differ in age, number of mismatches, and cold ischemia time (CIT), but they had a significantly shorter dialysis vintage (18.3 ± 25.7 vs 39.6 ± 34.3 months, P = .01) and a lower incidence of DGF (5% vs 37%, P = .006). The duration of hospitalization and creatinine concentration at discharge and after 6 months were similar. Preemptively transplanted patients had a significantly shorter CIT (ND vs DO - 576 ± 362 vs 1113 ± 574, P = .01; ND vs HD - 576 ± 362 vs 1025 ± 585 minutes, P = .01). DGF did not occur in any of the patients transplanted preemptively. They had slightly shorter hospitalization times and, compared to HD, better graft function at discharge. After 6 months, creatinine levels were comparable to HD and PD. Patients dialyzed for less than 12 months, regardless of the method, had a lower incidence of DGF. Peritoneal dialysis and a short duration of pre-transplant dialysis may improve the early results of kidney transplantation.

Kidney transplant utilising donors after circulatory death: The first report from the African continent.

At Groote Schuur Hospital in Cape Town, South Africa, the number of deceased organ donors has declined over the past 2 decades, necessitating a more liberal approach to donor selection. In 2007, measures to expand the deceased kidney donor pool were implemented, including an HIV positive-to-positive transplant programme and the utilisation of extended-criteria donors as well as donors after circulatory death (DCDs). To report on our institutional experience with DCD kidney transplants and to encourage this approach among other African centres to improve access to transplantation. An observational cohort study of consecutive DCD kidney transplants at Groote Schuur Hospital over a 17-year period was performed. Primary endpoints were 1-, 2- and 5-year graft and patient survival. Secondary endpoints included the incidence of delayed graft function (DGF), 30-day morbidity, length of stay, and donor and recipient clinical characteristics. Fifteen DCD procurements were performed, with no kidneys discarded. Thirty kidney transplants were performed, with a median (interquartile range) cold ischaemic time of 11.5 (8 - 14) hours. The incidence of DGF was 60.0%, and 30-day morbidity (other than DGF) was 20.0%. Graft survival at 1, 2 and 5 years was 100%, 96.0% and 73.7%, respectively. Patient survival at 1, 2 and 5 years was 93.3%, 93.3% and 88.4%, respectively. Long-term graft and patient survival was comparable with the international literature. DCD may present a unique opportunity to expand deceased donation throughout Africa, particularly in areas affected by a lack of brain death legislation and religious or cultural objections to donation after brain death.

Prevention of Delayed Graft Function in Kidney Transplant Recipients through a Continuous Infusion of the Prostaglandin Analogue Iloprost: A Single-Center Prospective Study.

Delayed graft function (DGF) is common after kidney transplantation from deceased donors and may significantly affect post-transplant outcomes. This study aimed to evaluate whether an innovative approach, based on the administration of the intravenous prostaglandin analogue iloprost, could be beneficial in reducing the incidence of DGF occurring after kidney transplantation from deceased donors. This prospective, randomized (1:1), placebo-controlled study enrolled all consecutive patients who received a kidney transplant from a deceased donor from January 2000 to December 2012 and who were treated in the peri-transplant period with the prostaglandin analogue iloprost at 0.27 μg/min through an elastomeric pump (treatment group) or with a placebo (control group). A total of 476 patients were included: DGF was reported in 172 (36.1%) patients in the entire cohort. The multivariate analysis showed that the donor's age > 70 years (OR 2.50, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.40-3.05, p < 0.001), cold ischemia time > 24 h (OR 2.60, 95% CI: 1.50-4.51, p < 0.001), the donor's acute kidney injury (OR 2.71, 95% CI: 1.61-4.52, p = 0.021) and, above all, the recipient's arterial hypotension (OR 5.06, 95% CI: 2.52-10.1, p < 0.0001) were the strongest risk factors for developing post-transplant DGF. The incidence of DGF was 21.4% in the treatment group and 50.9% in the control group (p < 0.001). Interestingly, among patients who developed DGF, those who received iloprost had a shorter duration of post-transplant DGF (10.5 ± 8.3 vs. 13.4 ± 6.7, days, p = 0.016). This study showed that the use of a continuous infusion of iloprost could safely and effectively reduce the incidence of DGF in recipients of deceased-donor kidneys, allowing a better graft functionality as well as a better graft survival.

The impact of preservation solutions for static cold storage on kidney transplantation outcomes: Results of a Brazilian nationwide multicenter study.

This study evaluated the current practices of selecting cold storage preservation solutions in Brazil and their impact on delayed graft function (DGF) incidence and 1-year outcomes in kidney transplant recipients. A retrospective cohort study was conducted, including 3,134 brain-dead deceased donor kidney transplants performed between 2014 and 2015 in 18 Brazilian centers. The most commonly used preservation solution was Euro-collins (EC, 55.4%), followed by Histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate (HTK, 30%) and Institut Georges Lopez (IGL-1, 14.6%). The incidence of DGF was 54.4%, with 11.7% of patients requiring dialysis for more than 14 days, indicating prolonged DGF. Upon adjusting for confounding variables, HTK demonstrated a significantly lower risk of DGF than EC (OR 0.7350.82500.926), as did IGL-1 (OR 0.6050.7120.837). Similar protective effects were observed for prolonged DGF when comparing HTK (OR 0.4780.5990.749) and IGL-1 (OR 0.4780.6810.749) against EC. No significant association was found between preservation solutions and 1-year death-censored graft survival. In conclusion, EC was the most frequently used cold storage perfusion solution, demonstrating a higher incidence and duration of DGF compared with HTK and IGL-1, but with no impact on 1-year graft survival.

Delayed Graft Function After Kidney Transplantation: The Role of Residual Diuresis and Waste Products, as Oxalic Acid and Its Precursors.

Delayed graft function (DGF) after kidney transplantation heralds a worse prognosis. In patients with hyperoxaluria, the incidence of DGF is high. Oxalic acid is a waste product that accumulates when kidney function decreases. We hypothesize that residual diuresis and accumulated waste products influence the DGF incidence. Patients transplanted between 2018-2022 participated in the prospective cohort study. Pre-transplant concentrations of oxalic acid and its precursors were determined. Data on residual diuresis and other recipient, donor or transplant related variables were collected. 496 patients were included, 154 were not on dialysis. Oxalic acid, and glyoxylic acid, were above upper normal concentrations in 98.8%, and 100% of patients. Residual diuresis was ≤150mL/min in 24% of patients. DGF occurred in 157 patients. Multivariable binary logistic regression analysis demonstrated a significant influence of dialysis type, recipient BMI, donor type, age, and serum creatinine on the DGF risk. Residual diuresis and glycolic acid concentration were inversely proportionally related to this risk, glyoxylic acid directly proportionally. Results in the dialysis population showed the same results, but glyoxylic acid lacked significance. In conclusion, low residual diuresis is associated with increased DGF incidence. Possibly accumulated waste products also play a role. Pre-emptive transplantation may decrease the incidence of DGF.

Diuretic Use in Post-Kidney Transplant Patients: A Retrospective Chart Review

The occurrence of delayed graft function (DGF) significantly enhances the possibility of both acute and chronic rejection of the transplanted organ, thereby reducing patient quality of life and survival rates. To prevent and manage oliguria in renal transplant patients, loop diuretics are presently commonly used. In our study, we assessed the possible impact of furosemide on the incidence of DGF among kidney transplant recipients. A review of medical records was conducted to examine demographic characteristics and kidney transplant outcomes in an adult (older than 18 years old) population. The primary objective was to determine the incidence of delayed graft function (DGF), whereas the secondary objective was to compare the creatinine levels and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at day 30 and day 90 post-transplantation in patients who were administered furosemide vs those who were not. This study included 330 patients who underwent kidney transplantation. Furosemide was administered to 169 (51.3%), whereas 161(48.7%) patients did not receive continued dose of diuretic postoperatively. The rate of DGF was significantly higher in patients who received furosemide than in those who did not (furosemide 44% vs 4%; P < .001). The eGFR was lower in the furosemide group compared to the no furosemide group at day 30 (56 ± 24 vs 71 ± 24 mL/min/1.73 m2, P < .001) and day 90 (66 ± 27 vs 78 ± 25 mL/min/1.73 m2, P < .001). Our results show that there is no benefit in treating an oliguric AKI with furosemide. Administration of furosemide, especially in high doses, may increase the risk of toxicity, delay dialysis, and increase the length of stay.

Association between peri-transplant acid-base parameters and graft dysfunction types in kidney transplantation.

Perioperative acid-base disturbance could be informative regarding the possible slow graft function (SGF) or delayed graft function (DGF) development. There is a lack of data regarding the relationship between perioperative acid-base parameters and graft dysfunction in kidney transplant (KT) recipients. We aim to determine the incidence of graft dysfunction types and the association between them and acid-base parameters. We performed a prospective, cohort study on 54 adults, KT recipients, between 1st of January 2019 and 31st of December 2019. Graft function was defined and classified in three categories: immediate graft function (IGF) (serum creatinine < 3 mg/dL at day 5 after KT), SGF (serum creatinine ≥ 3mg/dL at day 5 or ≥ 2.5mg dL at day 7 after KT) and DGF (the need for at least one dialysis treatment in the first week after kidney transplantation). Among the 54 KT recipients, the incidence of SGF and DGF was 13% and 11.1%, respectively. SGF was significantly associated with lower intraoperative pH (7.26± 0.05 vs 7.35± 0.06, p= 0.004), preoperative and intraoperative base excess (BE) [-7.0 (-10.0 ߝ -6.0) vs -3.4 (-7.8 ߝ - 2.1) mmol/L, p= 0.04 and -10.3 (-11.0 ߝ -9.1) vs -4.0 (-6.3 ߝ - 3.0) mmol/L, p= 0.002, respectively] and serum bicarbonate (HCO3-) (16.0± 2.7 vs 19.3± 3.4 mmol/L, p= 0.01 and 14.1± 1.9 vs 18.8± 3.2 mmol/L, p= 0.002 respectively), compared to IGF. DGF was significantly associated with lower intraoperative values of pH (7.27± 0.05 vs 7.35± 0.06, p= 0.003), BE [-7.1 (-10.9 ߝ -6.1) vs -4.0 (-6.3 ߝ - 3.0) mmol/L, p= 0.02] and HCO3- (15.9± 2.4 vs 18.8± 3.2 mmol/L, p=0.02) compared to IGF. No differences were observed between SGF and DGF patients in any of the perioperative acid-base parameters. In conclusion we found that kidney graft dysfunction types are associated with perioperative acid-base parameters and perioperative metabolic acidosis could provide important information to predict SGF or DGF occurrence.

The Effect of Perfusate Temperature on Delayed Graft Function in Deceased Donor Renal Transplantation.

Introduction: Renal allograft hypothermic machine perfusion results in a decreased incidence of delayed graft function compared with static cold storage. Ensuring perfusate temperatures remain within the target range of 4-10 °C may impact delayed graft function rates. Project Aims: To identify whether this target was achieved and, if not, whether higher perfusate temperature was associated with delayed graft function. Design: In this retrospective cohort study, transplanted grafts from deceased donors placed on hypothermic machine perfusion pump from June 2019 to August 2020 were analyzed. Measurements were recovered after 5, 15, 60, and 180 min of perfusion. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed to identify predictors of delayed graft function. Results: A total of 113 grafts from 94 donors were analyzed. Of these, 21 (19%) developed delayed graft function. On univariable logistic regression, variables associated with delayed graft function included older donor age (OR 1.08, P = .002), higher Kidney Donor Profile Index score (OR 1.03, P = .024), and higher 5-min perfusate temperature (T5 min; OR 1.49, P = .014). A higher T5 min was also associated with delayed graft function in multivariable logistic regression models (OR 1.58, P = .005; OR 1.37, P = .08). Grafts with T5 min >10 °C were more likely to experience delayed graft function than those with T5 min <10 °C (OR 4.5, P = .006). Conclusion: Higher early perfusate temperature was an independent predictor of delayed graft function and may be due to inadequate cooling of the circuit prior to placing grafts on pump. Quality improvement initiatives targeting early perfusate temperatures of ≤10 °C may reduce delayed graft function incidence.

Impact of Extraction Time During Donation After Circulatory Death Organ Procurement on Kidney Function After Transplantation in The Netherlands.

In The Netherlands, 60% of deceased-donor kidney offers are after donation after circulatory death. Cold and warm ischemia times are known risk factors for delayed graft function (DGF) and inferior allograft survival. Extraction time is a relatively new ischemia time. During procurement, cooling of the kidneys is suboptimal with ongoing ischemia. However, evidence is lacking on whether extraction time has an impact on DGF if all ischemic periods are included. Between 2012 and 2018, 1524 donation after circulatory death kidneys were procured and transplanted in The Netherlands. Donation and transplantation-related data were obtained from the database of the Dutch Transplant Foundation. The primary outcome parameter was the incidence of DGF. In our cohort, extraction time ranged from 14 to 237 min, with a mean of 62 min (SD 32). In multivariate logistic regression analysis, extraction time was an independent risk factor for incidence of DGF (odds ratio per minute increase 1.008; 95% confidence interval, 1.003-1.013; P = 0.001). The agonal phase, hypoperfusion time, and anastomosis time were not independent risk factors for incidence of DGF. Considering all known ischemic periods during the donation after the circulatory death process, prolonged kidney extraction time increased the risk of DGF after kidney transplantation.

Perioperative Management Of Blood Pressure In Living Donor Kidney Transplantation

Delayed graft function (DGF) is a poor clinical prognostic factor in kidney transplantation (KT) which frequently occurs due to acute kidney injury (AKI) within the postoperative first week. It has been encountered in the review of available data that meticulous perioperative hemodynamic management of the patients performed KT may reduce the incidence of DGF

SP3.1 80 patient series from UK renal transplant centre shows extended criteria deceased donor transplants are associated with a poorer graft function but at no increased risk of graft loss after 1 year

Abstract Aims Between 12/2018 – 12/2021 our centre performed 163 deceased donor transplants. 30.7% of these utilised organs from so-called extended criteria donors (ECD). ECD [originally in context of donation after brain death (DBD), but later used also for donation after cardiac death (DCD)] refers to donors &amp;gt;60yo; or &amp;gt;50yo with ≥2 of hypertension / death from CVA / Cr &amp;gt;133. We wanted to assess outcomes in ECD transplant recipients and compare with outcomes of our standard donor (SCD) recipients. Methods Retrospective analysis of 40 ECD transplants (12/2018- 12/2021) and control group of 40 age-matched (overall mean age 58.2) SCD recipients with 12 month follow up. Results The groups were comparable regarding proportion of DCD donors (ECD 62.5%, SCD 50%; X2= 1.270 p=0.260). Although rate of delayed graft function (DGF) was higher in the ECD group, this was not statistically significant (ECD: 62.5%, SCD:47.5%; X2=1.257 p=0.262). There was, however a difference in creatinine at discharge (median ECD:390; SCD:221; U= 1018.500; p=0.036) and in EGFR at 1 year (mean ECD:39.62; SCD: 54.3; t=-3.780 p&amp;lt;0.001). There was no difference in incidence of graft loss (ECD:0%; SCD:2.5%; X2=1.013, p=0.314) or mortality (ECD:5.0%; SCD:7.5%; X2=0.213, p=0.644). There was no difference in index length of stay (median ECD:6; SCD: 6; U=928.000 p=0.212), or total readmissions (median ECD:2.5; SCD:2.0; U=902.500 p=0.319). Conclusions In our sample incidence of DGF was similar between the two groups. ECD recipients had poorer graft function at 1 year but there was no evidence of increased risk of graft loss at 1 year.

Past, Current, and Future Perspectives on Transplanting Acute Kidney Injury Kidneys.

(1) Background: Acute kidney injury (AKI) kidneys have high non-utilization rates due to concerns regarding unfavorable outcomes. In this paper, we aimed to review the past, present, and future opinions on AKI kidneys. (2) Methods: A PubMed search was conducted for topics relevant to AKI kidney transplantation. (3) Results: Current short- and long-term data on AKI kidneys have demonstrated good outcomes including favorable graft function and survival. The role of procurement biopsies is controversial, but they have been shown to be beneficial in AKI kidneys by allowing clinicians to differentiate between reversible tubular injury and irreversible cortical necrosis. Machine perfusion has also been applied to AKI kidneys and has been shown to reduce delayed graft function (DGF). The incidence of DGF increases with AKI severity and its management can be challenging. Strategies employed to counteract this have included early initiation of dialysis after kidney transplantation, early targeting of adequate immunosuppression levels to minimize rejection risk, and establishment of outpatient dialysis. (4) Conclusions: Despite good outcomes, there continue to be barriers that impact AKI kidney utilization. Successful strategies have included use of procurement biopsies or machine perfusion and expectant management of DGF. With increasing experience, better use of AKI kidneys can result in additional opportunities to expand the donor pool.

Choosing fluids to reduce the risk of delayed graft function after deceased donor kidney transplantation

Delayed graft function (DGF) after deceased donor kidney transplantation, defined clinically as the need for at least one dialysis session within the first week after transplantation, is a common occurrence. 1 Swanson KJ Bhattarai M Parajuli S Delayed graft function: current status and future directions. Curr Opin Organ Transplant. 2023; 28: 1-7 Crossref PubMed Scopus (0) Google Scholar Use of organs that are predisposed to DGF is increasing, 2 NHS Blood and TransplantOrgan and tissue donation and transplantation. Activity Report 2021/22. nhsbtdbe.blob.core.windows.net/umbraco-assets-corp/27108/activity-report-2021-2022.pdfDate accessed: March 23, 2023 Google Scholar meaning it is important to consider the clinical sequelae of DGF. In a systematic review and meta-analysis of 38 studies, 3 Li MT Ramakrishnan A Yu M et al. Effects of delayed graft function on transplant outcomes: a meta-analysis. Transplant Direct. 2023; 9: e1433 Crossref PubMed Scopus (1) Google Scholar DGF was associated with adverse short-term and long-term outcomes, including risk for rejection, graft failure, and (in single-centre studies only) all-cause mortality. Some studies suggest the duration of DGF is more important than its occurrence. 4 Schrezenmeier E Müller M Friedersdorff F et al. Evaluation of severity of delayed graft function in kidney transplant recipients. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2022; 37: 973-981 Crossref PubMed Scopus (2) Google Scholar However, any DGF has a real-world impact on patients and can influence decision making for clinicians. For example, a third of North American transplant professionals indicated in a survey that the risk of DGF had a role in their willingness to accept organs, 5 Jadlowiec CC Hippen B Gill J et al. Current opinions on DGF management practices: a survey of the United States and Canada. Clin Transplant. 2023; 37: e14949 Crossref PubMed Scopus (0) Google Scholar and strategies to reduce DGF are a clinical priority. A simple intervention to reduce DGF might relate to optimising intravenous fluid replacement. Isotonic sodium chloride (0·9% saline) is the standard of care in many transplantation units. However, 0·9% saline might be harmful due to its high chloride content, which causes metabolic acidosis and can promote acute kidney injury, thus DGF. 6 Yunos NM Bellomo R Hegarty C Story D Ho L Bailey M Association between a chloride-liberal vs chloride-restrictive intravenous fluid administration strategy and kidney injury in critically ill adults. JAMA. 2012; 308: 1566-1572 Crossref PubMed Scopus (844) Google Scholar Balanced crystalloid solution versus saline in deceased donor kidney transplantation (BEST-Fluids): a pragmatic, double-blind, randomised, controlled trialAmong patients receiving a deceased donor kidney transplant, intravenous fluid therapy with balanced crystalloid solution reduced the incidence of DGF compared with saline. Balanced crystalloid solution should be the standard-of-care intravenous fluid used in deceased donor kidney transplantation. Full-Text PDF

Balanced crystalloid solution versus saline in deceased donor kidney transplantation (BEST-Fluids): a pragmatic, double-blind, randomised, controlled trial

Delayed graft function (DGF) is a major adverse complication of deceased donor kidney transplantation. Intravenous fluids are routinely given to patients receiving a transplant to maintain intravascular volume and optimise graft function. Saline (0·9% sodium chloride) is widely used but might increase the risk of DGF due to its high chloride content. We aimed to test our hypothesis that using a balanced low-chloride crystalloid solution (Plasma-Lyte 148) instead of saline would reduce the incidence of DGF. BEST-Fluids was a pragmatic, registry-embedded, multicentre, double-blind, randomised, controlled trial at 16 hospitals in Australia and New Zealand. Adults and children of any age receiving a deceased donor kidney transplant were eligible; those receiving a multi-organ transplant or weighing less than 20 kg were excluded. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) using an adaptive minimisation algorithm to intravenous balanced crystalloid solution (Plasma-Lyte 148) or saline during surgery and up until 48 h after transplantation. Trial fluids were supplied in identical bags and clinicians determined the fluid volume, rate, and time of discontinuation. The primary outcome was DGF, defined as receiving dialysis within 7 days after transplantation. All participants who consented and received a transplant were included in the intention-to-treat analysis of the primary outcome. Safety was analysed in all randomly assigned eligible participants who commenced surgery and received trial fluids, whether or not they received a transplant. This study is registered with Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, (ACTRN12617000358347), and ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03829488). Between Jan 26, 2018, and Aug 10, 2020, 808 participants were randomly assigned to balanced crystalloid (n=404) or saline (n=404) and received a transplant (512 [63%] were male and 296 [37%] were female). One participant in the saline group withdrew before 7 days and was excluded, leaving 404 participants in the balanced crystalloid group and 403 in the saline group that were included in the primary analysis. DGF occurred in 121 (30%) of 404 participants in the balanced crystalloid group versus 160 (40%) of 403 in the saline group (adjusted relative risk 0·74 [95% CI 0·66 to 0·84; p<0·0001]; adjusted risk difference 10·1% [95% CI 3·5 to 16·6]). In the safety analysis, numbers of investigator-reported serious adverse events were similar in both groups, being reported in three (<1%) of 406 participants in the balanced crystalloid group versus five (1%) of 409 participants in the saline group (adjusted risk difference -0·5%, 95% CI -1·8 to 0·9; p=0·48). Among patients receiving a deceased donor kidney transplant, intravenous fluid therapy with balanced crystalloid solution reduced the incidence of DGF compared with saline. Balanced crystalloid solution should be the standard-of-care intravenous fluid used in deceased donor kidney transplantation. Medical Research Future Fund and National Health and Medical Research Council (Australia), Health Research Council (New Zealand), Royal Australasian College of Physicians, and Baxter.

Outcomes of Kidney Perfusion Techniques in Transplantation from Deceased Donors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

The high demand for organs in kidney transplantation and the expansion of the donor pool have led to the widespread implementation of machine perfusion technologies. In this study, we aim to provide an up-to-date systematic review of the developments in this expanding field over the past 10 years, with the aim of answering the question: "which perfusion technique is the most promising technique in kidney transplantation?" A systematic review of the literature related to machine perfusion in kidney transplantation was performed. The primary outcome measure was delayed graft function (DGF), and secondary outcomes included rates of rejection, graft survival, and patient survival rates after 1 year. Based on the available data, a meta-analysis was performed. The results were compared with data from static cold storage, which is still the standard of care in many centers worldwide. A total of 56 studies conducted in humans were included, and 43 studies reported outcomes of hypothermic machine perfusion (HMP), with a DGF rate of 26.4%. A meta-analysis of 16 studies showed significantly lower DGF rates in the HMP group compared to those of static cold storage (SCS). Five studies reported outcomes of hypothermic machine perfusion + O2, with an overall DGF rate of 29.7%. Two studies explored normothermic machine perfusion (NMP). These were pilot studies, designed to assess the feasibility of this perfusion approach in the clinical setting. Six studies reported outcomes of normothermic regional perfusion (NRP). The overall incidence of DGF was 71.5%, as it was primarily used in uncontrolled DCD (Maastricht category I-II). Three studies comparing NRP to in situ cold perfusion showed a significantly lower rate of DGF with NRP. The systematic review and meta-analysis provide evidence that dynamic preservation strategies can improve outcomes following kidney transplantation. More recent approaches such as normothermic machine perfusion and hypothermic machine perfusion + O2 do show promising results but need further results from the clinical setting. This study shows that the implementation of perfusion strategies could play an important role in safely expanding the donor pool.

Does dialysis modality or duration influence outcomes in simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplant recipients? Single center experience and review of the literature.

The influence of dialysis modality and duration on outcomes following simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation (SPKT) remains uncertain. We performed a single-center retrospective review in 255 SPKT recipients according to dialysis modality (55 preemptive/no dialysis-ND, 70 peritoneal dialysis-PD, 130 hemodialysis-HD) and duration (55 none, 137<2 years, 41 2-4 years, 22>4 years). Mean follow-up was 9.4 years (median 9.2 years). Early (3-month) relaparotomy rate (20% ND vs. 36% PD/HD, p=.03) was lower in ND patients. There were no differences in early graft loss, patient survival, overall or death-censored kidney or pancreas graft survival rates (GSR) at 1 or 10 years follow-up. When analyzing dialysis duration, there were no differences in rates of pancreas thrombosis or early pancreas graft loss. Kidney delayed graft function (DGF) was lower in the ND/short dialysis groups combined (1.0%), compared to the intermediate/long dialysis groups combined (9.5%, p=.003). Early relaparotomy rates were higher with longer duration of dialysis (p=.045 between ND and >4 years of dialysis). Patient survival in the long dialysis group was 50% compared to 69.5% in the other three groups combined (p=.09). However, both overall and death-censored kidney and pancreas GSR were comparable. Preemptively transplanted patients had a lower incidence of kidney DGF and relaparotomy whereas patient survival was slightly lower with longer dialysis vintage prior to SPKT. Dialysis modality and duration did not influence either overall or death-censored pancreas or kidney GSR in patients with short waiting times, low KDPI donor organs, and dialysis duration up to 4 years.