Incidence Of Cytokine Release Syndrome Research Articles

Tocilizumab Prophylaxis Following Axicabtagene Ciloleucel in Relapsed or Refractory Large B-cell Lymphoma

Axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) is an autologous anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy approved in patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL). Most patients treated with axi-cel experience cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and/or adverse neurologic events (NEs). To explore potential approaches for reducing CAR T-cell-related toxicities with axi-cel, several safety expansion cohorts were added to the pivotal ZUMA-1 trial. ZUMA-1 Cohort 3 was an exploratory safety cohort that investigated the use of the IL-6 receptor blocking antibody tocilizumab and anticonvulsant levetiracetam as prophylaxis against CRS and NEs in patients treated with axi-cel. Patients with R/R LBCL were enrolled in Cohort 3 and received conditioning chemotherapy on Days -5 through -3 followed by a single infusion of axi-cel (2 × 106 cells/kg) on Day 0. Prophylactic tocilizumab (8 mg/kg) was administered 48 hours after axi-cel infusion. Primary endpoints were incidence and severity of CRS and NEs. Key secondary endpoints included the incidence of adverse events, objective response rate (ORR), duration of response, progression-free survival, overall survival (OS), and biomarker analyses (eg, circulating CAR T cells, cytokines, chemokines). Forty-two patients were enrolled in Cohort 3, 38 of whom received axi-cel. In the 24-month analysis, any-grade CRS and NEs occurred in 92% and 87% of patients, and Grade ≥3 CRS and NEs occurred in 3% and 42% of patients, respectively. One Grade 5 NE (cerebral edema) occurred. With 24-month minimum follow-up, the ORR was 63%, and 39.5% of patients had ongoing response. With 48-month follow-up, median OS was 34.8 months (95% CI, 5.4-not estimable). CAR T-cell expansion in ZUMA-1 Cohort 3 was comparable with pivotal Cohorts 1 and 2. Consistent with tocilizumab-mediated inhibition of IL-6R, serum IL-6 levels were increased relative to Cohorts 1 and 2. Grade ≥3 NEs were associated with elevated IL-6 levels, proinflammatory cytokines, and myeloid cells in the cerebrospinal fluid. Based on these findings, prophylactic tocilizumab is not recommended to prevent CAR T-cell-related adverse events, and beneficial effects of prophylactic levetiracetam remain uncertain in patients with R/R LBCL.

Novel prognostic scoring systems for severe CRS and ICANS after anti-CD19 CAR T cells in large B-cell lymphoma

Autologous anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells are now used in routine practice for relapsed/refractory (R/R) large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL). Severe (grade ≥ 3) cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity (ICANS) are still the most concerning acute toxicities leading to frequent intensive care unit (ICU) admission, prolonging hospitalization, and adding significant cost to treatment. We report on the incidence of CRS and ICANS and the outcomes in a large cohort of 925 patients with LBCL treated with axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) or tisagenlecleucel (tisa-cel) in France based on patient data captured through the DESCAR-T registry. CRS of any grade occurred in 778 patients (84.1%), with 74 patients (8.0%) with grade 3 CRS or higher, while ICANS of any grade occurred in 375 patients (40.5%), with 112 patients (12.1%) with grade ≥ 3 ICANS. Based on the parameters selected by multivariable analyses, two independent prognostic scoring systems (PSS) were derived, one for grade ≥ 3 CRS and one for grade ≥ 3 ICANS. CRS-PSS included bulky disease, a platelet count < 150 G/L, a C-reactive protein (CRP) level > 30 mg/L and no bridging therapy or stable or progressive disease (SD/PD) after bridging. Patients with a CRS-PSS score > 2 had significantly higher risk to develop grade ≥ 3 CRS. ICANS-PSS included female sex, low level of platelets (< 150 G/L), use of axi-cel and no bridging therapy or SD/PD after bridging. Patients with a CRS-PSS score > 2 had significantly higher risk to develop grade ≥ 3 ICANS. Both scores were externally validated in international cohorts of patients treated with tisa-cel or axi-cel.

Optimizing the post-CAR T monitoring period in recipients of axicabtagene ciloleucel, tisagenlecleucel, and lisocabtagene maraleucel

AbstractCD19–directed chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR T) therapies, including axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel), tisagenlecleucel (tisa-cel), and lisocabtagene maraleucel (liso-cel), have transformed the treatment landscape for B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma, showcasing significant efficacy but also highlighting toxicity risks such as cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell–associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS). The US Food and Drug Administration has mandated patients remain close to the treatment center for 4 weeks as part of a Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy to monitor and manage these toxicities, which, although cautious, may add to cost of care, be burdensome for patients and their families, and present challenges related to patient access and socioeconomic disparities. This retrospective study across 9 centers involving 475 patients infused with axi-cel, tisa-cel, and liso-cel from 2018 to 2023 aimed to assess CRS and ICANS onset and duration, as well as causes of nonrelapse mortality (NRM) in real-world CAR T recipients. Although differences were noted in the incidence and duration of CRS and ICANS between CAR T products, new-onset CRS and ICANS are exceedingly rare after 2 weeks after infusion (0% and 0.7% of patients, respectively). No new cases of CRS occurred after 2 weeks and a single case of new-onset ICANS occurred in the third week after infusion. NRM is driven by ICANS in the early follow-up period (1.1% until day 28) and then by infection through 3 months after infusion (1.2%). This study provides valuable insights into optimizing CAR T therapy monitoring, and our findings may provide a framework to reduce physical and financial constraints for patients.

Safety outcomes of teclistamab accelerated dose escalation.

Teclistamab, a bispecific T-cell engaging antibody targeting B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA), is indicated for the treatment of relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma after at least four lines of therapy. It has boxed warnings for life threatening cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS). To mitigate these risks, teclistamab is initiated using step-up doses. This article examines safety event rates following the implementation of a 2-day separation between step-up doses at one institution to streamline patient care. This was a retrospective, single-center study encompassing all patients who received teclistamab within a 1-year period. The primary endpoint was the overall incidence of CRS and ICANS. Secondary endpoints included hospital length of stay, hematological toxicities, infection rates, among other adverse events. A total of 27 patients were included in the analysis and stratified into accelerated (days 1,3,5) or standard (days 1,4,7) dosing groups. CRS occurred in 48% (11) of patients for the accelerated dosing and 50% (2) for the standard dosing group. ICANS was seen in 17% (4) of patients in the accelerated dosing group and none in the standard dosing group. Average length of stay in the accelerated dose was 7.6 days versus 9.2 days in the standard dose group. Accelerated dose escalation of teclistamab yielded safety event rates comparable to those in the literature. These findings may support outpatient administration for teclistamab. Accelerated dose escalation strategy allowed for the optimization of hospitalization and resources.

The Kinetics of Inflammation-Related Proteins and Cytokines in Children Undergoing CAR-T Cell Therapy-Are They Biomarkers of Therapy-Related Toxicities?

CD19-targeted CAR-T cell therapy has revolutionized the treatment of relapsed/refractory (r/r) pre-B acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). However, it can be associated with acute toxicities related to immune activation, particularly cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS). Cytokines released from activated immune cells play a key role in their pathophysiology. This study was a prospective analysis of proinflammatory proteins and cytokines in children treated with tisagenlecleucel. Serial measurements of C-reactive protein, fibrinogen, ferritin, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IFNγ, and TNFα were taken before treatment and on consecutive days after infusion. The incidence of CRS was 77.8%, and the incidence of ICANS was 11.1%. No CRS of grade ≥ 3 was observed. All complications occurred within 14 days following infusion. Higher biomarker concentrations were found in children with CRS grade ≥ 2. Their levels were correlated with disease burden and CAR-T cell dose. While cytokine release syndrome was common, most cases were mild, primarily due to low disease burden before lymphodepleting chemotherapy (LDC). ICANS occurred less frequently but exhibited various clinical courses. None of the toxicities were fatal. All of the analyzed biomarkers rose within 14 days after CAR-T infusion, with most reaching their maximum around the third day following the procedure.

“Fast but not so furious”: A condensed step‐up dosing schedule of teclistamab for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma

AbstractTeclistamab is a B‐cell maturation antigen (BCMA)‐directed bispecific T‐cell engager approved for relapsed‐refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and Immune effector cell‐associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) are well‐documented treatment ‐related adverse events of teclistamab. The prescribing information recommends step‐up dosing on days 1, 4, and 7 with 48–72 h of inpatient observation after each dose to monitor for CRS. This leads to a more than weeklong hospital stay, adding to the cost of therapy, resource utilization, and patient inconvenience. Here, we present a single center retrospective analysis addressing the safety and utility of a condensed step‐up dosing schedule for teclistamab. All patients who were treated with teclistamab from November 2022 to August 2023 at the Medical University of South Carolina were included in the analysis. Patients received subcutaneous (SC) teclistamab with step‐up doses (0.06 and 0.3 mg/kg) separated by either 2 or 3 (48–72 h) before the administration of the first full (1.5 mg/kg) dose (days 1, 3, and 5 ‘condensed’ schedule or days 1, 4, and 7 ‘standard’ schedule, respectively). All patients were hospitalized for the two step‐up doses and first full dose of teclistamab and received pre‐medications prior to each dose. Patients could be discharged after a minimum of 24 h following the full dose, if they did not have any CRS or ICANS. Relevant data regarding incidence, severity, and onset of CRS was collected. Statistical analysis was completed to assess the probability of fever with the first full dose of teclistamab based on incidence of fever with previous doses. A total of 25 patients were included in the analysis. Twenty‐eight percent (7/25) of patients underwent the standard step up while the remaining 72% (18/25) underwent a condensed step up of teclistamab. More than half (53%, 13/25) of the patients experienced CRS during step up dosing. Grades 1 and 2 CRS occurred in 48% (12/25) and 4% (1/25) patients, respectively. Of the 13 patients that experienced CRS, 30% (4/13) fevered with the first dose, 84% (11/13) fevered with the second dose, and one patient developed fever after the third dose. The negative predictive value of being ‘fever free’ after doses 1 and 2 and remaining ‘fever free’ throughout hospitalization was 0.92. The median length of hospital stay among the 1, 3, and 5 step up group was 6 days (6–25) and 70% (14/20) of patients were discharged from the hospital within 7 days of treatment initiation. This report demonstrates the utility of a condensed step‐up schedule for teclistamab initiation. The schedule was found to be safe and reduced hospital length of stay. These results should prompt consideration of shorter hospital stays for patients who do not experience CRS and raise the possibility of outpatient administration with close observation.

Prophylactic tocilizumab reduces the incidence of cytokine release syndrome in relapsed/refractory myeloma patients treated with teclistamab: Implications for outpatient step-up dosing.

Prophylactic tocilizumab reduces the incidence of cytokine release syndrome in relapsed/refractory myeloma patients treated with teclistamab: Implications for outpatient step-up dosing.

Epcoritamab monotherapy in patients with relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma (EPCORE NHL-1): a phase 2 cohort of a single-arm, multicentre study

A standard of care and optimal duration of therapy have not been established for patients with multiply relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma. The aim of this study was to evaluate epcoritamab, a novel CD3 × CD20 bispecific antibody, in the third-line and later setting of follicular lymphoma. EPCORE NHL-1 is a multicohort, single-arm, phase 1-2 trial conducted at 88 sites across 15 countries. Here, we report the primary analysis of patients with relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma in the phase 2 part of the trial, which included the pivotal (dose expansion) cohort and the cycle 1 optimisation cohort. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older, had relapsed or refractory CD20+ follicular lymphoma (grade 1-3A), an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of up to 2, and had received at least two previous lines of therapy (including an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody and an alkylating agent or lenalidomide). Patients were treated with subcutaneous epcoritamab 48 mg in 28-day cycles: weekly in cycles 1-3, biweekly in cycles 4-9, and every 4 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. To mitigate the risk and severity of cytokine release syndrome, in the pivotal cohort, cycle 1 consisted of a step-up dosing regimen of a 0·16-mg priming dose on day 1 and a 0·80-mg intermediate dose on day 8, followed by subsequent 48-mg full doses and prophylactic prednisolone 100 mg; in the cycle 1 optimisation cohort, a second intermediate dose of 3 mg on day 15, adequate hydration, and prophylactic dexamethasone 15 mg were evaluated during cycle 1 to further reduce risk and severity of cytokine release syndrome. Primary endpoints were independently reviewed overall response rate for the pivotal cohort and the proportion of patients with grade 2 or worse and any-grade cytokine release syndrome for the cycle 1 optimisation cohort. Analyses were done in all enrolled patients who had received at least one dose of epcoritamab. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03625037, and is ongoing. Between June 19, 2020, and April 21, 2023, 128 patients (median age 65 years [IQR 55-72]; 49 [38%] female and 79 [62%] male) were enrolled and treated in the pivotal cohort (median follow-up 17·4 months [IQR 9·1-20·9]). The overall response rate was 82·0% (105 of 128 patients; 95% CI 74·3-88·3), with a complete response rate of 62·5% (80 of 128; 95% CI 53·5-70·9). The most common grade 3-4 treatment-emergent adverse event was neutropenia in 32 (25%) of 128 patients. Grade 1-2 cytokine release syndrome was reported in 83 (65%) of 128 patients; grade 3 cytokine release syndrome was reported in two (2%). Immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome was reported in eight (6%) of 128 patients (five [4%] grade 1; three [2%] grade 2). Between Oct 25, 2022, and Jan 8, 2024, 86 patients (median age 64 years [55-71]; 37 [43%] female and 49 [57%] male) were enrolled and treated in the cycle 1 optimisation cohort. The incidence of cytokine release syndrome was 49% (42 of 86 patients; eight [9%] grade 2; none of grade 3 or worse), with no reported immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome. Epcoritamab monotherapy showed clinically meaningful activity in patients with multiply relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma, and had a manageable safety profile. Genmab and AbbVie.

Metformin and cytokine release syndrome after immune effector cell therapy.

e14535 Background: Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) is the most common complication of chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CAR-T) for hematologic malignancies. We hypothesized that patients undergoing CAR-T therapy who are on metformin will experience a lower incidence or severity of CRS than patients not on this medication. Methods: We evaluated all patients treated with CAR-T at Mayo Clinic Rochester between 1/1/2018 and 1/31/2023, and abstracted relevant clinical and laboratory characteristics to determine the incidence and severity of CRS, PFS as well as OS in patients who were, or were not, on metformin before and during CAR-T therapy for Type 2 diabetes mellitus. We used the Chi-Square test, Mann-Whitney test and the Kaplan-Meier method to analyze data. Results: In the 5-year interval under consideration 237 patients received CAR-T, 168 for non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), and 69 for multiple myeloma (MM). 23 patients (15 NHL and 8 MM) were on metformin at the time of CAR-T. 15 patient developed CRS while on metformin and 175 patients not on metformin (p=0.05). Grade 3 or 4 CRS incidence was 4% in both groups (p=0.41). Of the 153 patients with NHL not on metformin, 121 developed any grade of CRS, while 10 of 15 patients on metformin developed CRS (p=0.268). 4 NHL patients developed CRS Grade ≥3 or higher, while 0 of 15 on metformin developed Grade ≥3 CRS (p=0.237). For the MM patients, the incidence of CRS was 49 patients not on metformin and 5 patients on metformin (p&lt;0.001). 3 MM patients developed CRS Grade ≥3 or higher, while 0 of 8 on metformin developed Grade ≥3 CRS (p=0.346). 12 of 15 patients on metformin with NHL achieved CR compared to 92 of 153 patients not on metformin (p=0.1305). 3 of 8 patients with MM on metformin compared to 24 of 61 patients with MM not on metformin achieved CR or better post CAR-T (p=0.92). Tocilizumab was used in 40% of patients on metformin but in 66% of patients not on metformin (p=0.0016). In NHL patients, PFS from CAR-T infusion was not reached (range: 6.3 to NR) for patients on metformin versus 9.9 months (range: 6.3–19.5) in patients not on metformin (p = 0.3332). In the MM patients, progression-free survival (PFS) from CAR-T infusion was 8.4 months (95% CI: 7.9–not reached [NR]) for patients on metformin and 22.6 months (13.7–NR) for those not on metformin (p = 0.07). Median OS for NHL patients on metformin was not reached (9.766–NR) versus 32.6 months (18.6–NR) for patients not on metformin (p = 0.7022). Median OS was 17 months (95% CI: 8.3 to NR) for patients with MM on metformin vs NR (95% CI: 9.4 to NR) for patients not on metformin (p = 0.2559). Conclusions: In this retrospective study, the co-administration of metformin during CAR-T cell therapy for NHL and MM appears to be associated with a numerically reduced incidence of CRS. The effect appears to be particularly marked in patients with multiple myeloma. Metformin therapy did not seem to affect the response to CAR-T therapy in either NHL or MM.

OPTec: A phase 2 study to evaluate outpatient (OP) step-up administration of teclistamab (Tec), a BCMA-targeting bispecific antibody, in patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM).

7528 Background: Tec is the only approved BCMA×CD3 bispecific antibody with personalized, weight-based dosing for triple-class exposed RRMM. In the MajesTEC-1 study, Tec showed deep, durable responses and a manageable safety profile. Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) occurred in 72% of pts during Cycles 1-2, and 33% of pts had recurrent CRS grade (gr) ≤3 (gr 3, 0.6%). Tocilizumab (Toci) is used to manage CRS. In a separate MajesTEC-1 cohort, pts who received prophylactic Toci (proToci) experienced less CRS, compared with pts who did not (26% vs 72%). Administering the Tec step-up dosing (SUD) regimen in the OP setting may make Tec more accessible, especially at community centers. Therefore, we are investigating whether proToci can reduce the incidence and severity of CRS associated with Tec and facilitate safe OP administration. Methods: This single-arm, non-randomized, multicenter, prospective study (NCT05972135) will evaluate proToci in pts treated with Tec using an OP SUD regimen. The primary endpoint is the overall incidence of CRS. Secondary endpoints include recurrent CRS gr ≥3, and any gr infections, neurotoxicity (NT) including ICANS, neutropenia, and efficacy. Eligible pts are ≥18 years with RRMM and ≥4 prior lines of therapy. Pts with rapidly progressing MM, CNS involvement, active infection, or contraindication to Toci are excluded. Toci 8 mg/kg IV is administered 2 to 4 hours prior to SUD 1 of Tec in an OP setting. The Tec SUD regimen consists of 0.06 mg/kg subcutaneously (SC), 0.3 mg/kg SC 2 to 4 days later, and 1.5 mg/kg SC 1 week after SUD 1. Tec 1.5 mg/kg SC is then given weekly for 12 cycles (28-day) or until MM progression or unacceptable toxicity. Pts with ≥PR after 6 mo can receive 1.5 mg/kg SC biweekly. IVIG is allowed in pts with serum IgG &lt;400 mg/dL. Results: Ten pts will be enrolled at 4 Sarah Cannon / US Oncology community sites in a safety and PK/PD cohort, followed by 40 pts at 12 sites. After the first 6 pts, a Data Review Committee (DRC) meeting was held. Median age was 74 (56 to 83) yrs; half of pts were male. Pts had received a median of 4.5 (4 to 6) prior therapies. One pt with diffuse bony lesions had an SAE of bilateral leg weakness and pain unrelated to Toci or Tec, did not complete the SUD regimen, and died on C1D40 of unknown causes. The other 5 pts completed the SUD regimen per protocol. AEs in &gt;1 pt were fatigue, headache and neutropenia (2 each). Gr 2 hypotension (1 pt) and gr 1 confusion and dizziness (1 pt each) were not felt due to CRS or ICANS. Stopping criteria (gr &gt;3 CRS or NT/ICANS) were not met. The DRC recommended proceeding with enrollment. Conclusions: Initial results indicate that proToci prior to SUD 1 of Tec may mitigate the risk of CRS. Enrollment is ongoing to determine if proToci may make Tec safe to give in an OP setting and increase accessibility in community centers. The full safety cohort will be presented at ASCO. Clinical trial information: NCT05972135 .

Longer-term follow-up of patients (pts) receiving prophylactic tocilizumab (toci) for the reduction of cytokine release syndrome (CRS) in the phase 1/2 MajesTEC-1 study of teclistamab in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM).

7517 Background: Emerging data suggest that administering toci prior to bispecific antibodies reduces the incidence of CRS, which may support outpatient therapy initiation. We previously showed that the incidence of CRS with teclistamab, the first approved BCMA×CD3 bispecific antibody with weight-based dosing for the treatment of pts with triple-class exposed RRMM, was reduced from 72% in the overall MajesTEC-1 study population to 26% in a cohort receiving a single dose of toci before the first teclistamab step-up dose. Here, we present an updated analysis with longer-term follow-up. Methods: Pts with triple-class exposed RRMM received subcutaneous teclistamab 1.5 mg/kg weekly in a prospective exploratory cohort or at a comparable fixed dose, following 2 step-up doses. Toci 8 mg/kg was given intravenously ≤4 hours before the first teclistamab step-up dose. CRS was graded per Lee et al ( Blood 2014;124:188-95) and managed per the study protocol. Results: This analysis included 24 pts with median follow-up 8.1 months (range, 0.9–13.2). Median age was 72 years (range, 50–82); 100% had ECOG PS score ≤1; 96% had International Staging System stage I/II; 74% had standard-risk cytogenetics; 21% had extramedullary plasmacytomas; 33% had ≥30% bone marrow plasma cells (biopsy or aspirate). Pts had a median of 4 prior lines of therapy (range, 2–9); 58% were triple-class refractory. CRS occurred in 6 pts (25%; 2 grade 1, 4 grade 2, no grade ≥3); 3 pts each had 1 recurrent CRS event. Median time to CRS onset was 2 days (range, 1–3); median duration was 2 days (range, 2–4). CRS was managed with additional toci in 5/6 pts and steroids in 1/6; all CRS events resolved and none led to teclistamab discontinuation. Most common adverse events (AEs; any grade/grade 3/4) were infections (79%/25%), neutropenia (63%/63%), and anemia (58%/25%); 5 pts had a neurotoxicity AE (grade 1 dizziness; grade 1 headache; grade 1 insomnia; grade 2 headache; grade 2 immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome). Overall response rate (n=22) was 73% (59% very good partial response or better). Timing of interleukin (IL)-6 induction in the prophylactic toci cohort was consistent with the phase 1 MajesTEC-1 population, with higher IL-6 levels as observed in other studies of IL-6 receptor-blocking antibodies. Conclusions: Prophylactic toci reduced the incidence of CRS with teclistamab, with a 65% relative reduction vs the overall MajesTEC-1 population (grade 1, 8% vs 50%; grade 2, 17% vs 21%). No new safety signals or impact on response to teclistamab was observed with longer follow-up. Prophylactic toci may be a useful measure to consider when selecting pts for outpatient administration of teclistamab in the future. This approach is being evaluated in the phase 2, multicenter, prospective OPTec study (NCT05972135). Clinical trial information: NCT03145181 / NCT04557098 .

Influence of gender on acute kidney injury among patients undergoing chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T cell) therapy: Insights from National Inpatient Sample.

e14524 Background: Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T Cell) immunotherapy has shown promising results in patients with B-cell leukemia and lymphoma and multiple myeloma. The side effect profile is still being studied and acute kidney injury (AKI) following treatment has been a commonly reported outcome in the context of cytokine release syndrome. In most cases, the kidney injury is reversible with adequate hydration and treatment of the underlying cytokine release syndrome when needed. This study aimed to investigate the outcomes of gender in patients undergoing CAR-T cell therapy along with the protective variables and independent predictors of AKI in this patient population. Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of data the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) between January 2019 and December 2020 to identify patients who underwent CAR-T cell therapy. We stratified the data based on gender and studied the incidence of AKI in patient admitted to the hospital primarily for CAR-T cell treatment. The primary endpoint was in-hospital mortality, AKI, average age, length of stay (LOS), and total charge by hospital. Additionally, we explored independent predictors and protective variables for AKI in patients receiving the treatment. Results: A total of 4010 patients underwent CAR-T Cell therapy from January 2019 to December 2020. Among these patients, females comprised 41.1% (n=1650). The mean age at the time of CAR-T cell treatment for males was 57.5 and for females 56.9. The inpatient mortality rates for both groups were 3% (p=0.97). The total incidence of AKI in patients undergoing CAR-T cell therapy was 14.9%, with rates of 19% in males and 9% in females (p&lt;0.01). LOS for males and females was 19 days, and 20 days respectively (p=0.4). Average total hospital charge for males was 958,345 and 1,017,685 for females (p=0.3642). Interestingly, there was no difference between genders in relation to the incidence of cytokine release syndrome (p=0.3). Notably, CKD, obesity, liver disease, and electrolyte imbalances were independent predictors of AKI with an adjusted odds ratio of 4.26 (p&lt;0.01; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.7-10.6), 2.7 (p=0.015; 95% CI: 1.2-6.06), 2.7 (p=0.045; 95% CI: 1.02-7.23), 2.5 (p&lt;0.01; 95% CI: 1.67-3.81). Importantly, gender was a protective variable for females when it came to AKI after CAR-T cell therapy with an adjusted odds ratio of 0.38 (p&lt;0.01; 95% CI: 0.23-0.63). Conclusions: AKI has been documented as a common side effect in patients undergoing CAR-T cell therapy. In most cases the kidney injury is reversible with adequate hydration and CRS treatment when necessary. Our study highlights CKD, obesity, liver disease, and electrolyte imbalance as independent predictors of AKI after CAR-T cell therapy and female gender as a predictive variable against developing AKI.

Real-world outcomes of teclistamab for the treatment of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma at UC San Diego Health: A single-institution experience.

e19504 Background: Bispecific antibodies (BsAb) are emerging as a promising class of cancer immunotherapy. Teclistamab, a BsAb targeting B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) expressed on plasma cells, received FDA approval for the treatment of relapsed/refractory (R/R) multiple myeloma (MM) in 2022. Here we describe the real-world experience of teclistamab at a single institution. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients with R/R MM who received teclistamab at University of California San Diego and had at least 6 months of follow up. Baseline characteristics, efficacy outcomes, and safety outcomes were collected. Kaplan-Meier method was used to describe survival. Results: A total of 18 patients who received teclistamab between 01/01/2023 and 06/15/2023 were included in this analysis. The median age was 67 years old (range 50-83). Median prior lines of therapy was 6.5 (range 3-11). All patients had triple-refractory disease; all but one had penta-refractory disease. Approximately 44% of patients had extramedullary plasmacytomas at time of BsAb initiation; 39% had received prior BCMA therapy (2 belantamab, 5 ide-cel) before teclistamab. High-risk cytogenetics (t(4;14), t(14;16), t(14;20), Del17p, Gain1q) were characterized for 13 patients with data available. 6 had a single high-risk mutation, 4 had two, and 1 had three. Incidence of cytokine release syndrome (CRS) was 12 (67%); (4 (33%) grade 2, no grade 3-5). 6 (50%) received tocilizumab to treat CRS. Immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) incidence was 2 (11%); (1 (50%) grade 2, no grade 3-5). Pain crisis occurred in 11% of patients. The incidence of infection was 67%; the majority were grade ≥ 3. The overall response rate (ORR) by IMWG criteria was 50%. All patients who responded had a very good partial response (VGPR) or better; further response data was not available due to the lack of restaging bone marrow biopsies during treatment. Median duration of response for the entire cohort was not reached. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 12.5 months (95% CI 1.0 – not reached); median overall survival (OS) was not reached (95% CI 7.8 – not reached).Univariate analyses showed no statistically significant relationship between response and prior BCMA therapy (p=.91), response and presence of extramedullary disease (p=.31), or response and mSMART risk stratification (p=.13). Conclusions: Overall, the incidence and grades of CRS, ICANS, and infection in our cohort were similar to those observed in the phase I/II MajesTEC-1 trial. In contrast, the ORR and PFS in this study were lower compared to the MajesTEC-1 study. This difference may be due to a greater proportion of patients with high-risk cytogenetics and more aggressive disease, as depicted by the higher median prior lines of therapy and higher rates of extra-medullary plasmacytomas and triple-/penta-class refractory disease.

Timing of Toxicities and Non-Relapse Mortality Following CAR T Therapy in Myeloma

BCMA-directed chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR T) therapies, including idecabtagene vicleucel (ide-cel) and ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta-cel), have transformed the treatment landscape for relapsed-refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM), offering remarkable efficacy with hallmark toxicity risks of cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS). The FDA mandates a 4-week monitoring period at the treatment center as part of a Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) to monitor and manage these toxicities, which, while prudent, may add unnecessary challenges related to access and socioeconomic disparities. We sought to assess CRS and ICANS onset and duration, as well as causes of non-relapse mortality (NRM) in real-world BCMA CAR T recipients in order to better inform future changes to the monitoring guidelines for CAR T recipients. This is a retrospective study across four academic centers that examined 129 ide-cel and cilta-cel recipients that received CAR T cell infusions from May 2021 to June 2023. Infusion and toxicities were managed per institutional guidelines in accordance with previously published guidelines. While differences were noted in the incidence and duration of CRS/ ICANS between ide-cel and cilta-cel, late-onset CRS and ICANS were rare after 2 weeks following infusion (0% and 1.6%, respectively). NRM was driven by hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis and infections in the early follow-up period (1.1% until Day 29), then by infections through three months post-infusion (1.2%). Our findings suggest that 25% of patients had to relocate for 4 weeks due to distance from the treatment center. With the low risk of CRS and ICANS after 2 weeks, a flexible shorter monitoring period may be reasonable, emphasizing collaboration with referring oncologists to improve NRM.

Can teclistamab be safely administered in the community? A single-center experience.

e19502 Background: Majority of patients with multiple myeloma are treated in community settings. Teclistamab, a highly effective bispecific T-cell engager (BiTE), was approved for the treatment of relapsed refractory multiple myeloma but has the potentially lethal toxicity of cytokine release syndrome (CRS). Due to the risk of CRS, pharmacies/providers must be REMS-certified prior to prescribing treatment. CRS most commonly occurs after the 1st 3 doses with a median onset time of 2 days. The hospitals most comfortable administering and monitoring for BiTE toxicities are typically transplant/cellular therapy centers. Patients are hospitalized for 48 hours following the administration of first 3 doses. Subsequent outpatient treatment typically continues at these centers as well, limiting patient access to highly effective treatment. Whether teclistamab can safely be given in non-rapid response community infusion centers (CIC) with a less vigorous monitoring schedule is unknown. We established a monitoring guide to expand teclistamab accessibility to 18 (CIC) in our network. Methods: At AHN, a monitoring guide was devised for teclistamab (Table) based on existing safety data regarding the incidence and timing of CRS. Patients would be admitted for the 1st 3 doses and monitored for 48 hours after each dose. Starting with the 4th dose, teclistamab administration at CIC with no additional monitoring would be allowed if there were no CRS events with the immediately preceding dose. If the patient experienced a CRS event with the immediately preceding dose, the patient would be monitored for 1 hour until a dose was tolerated with no subsequent CRS events. Nursing and pharmacist education was arranged for all CIC regarding CRS identification and management. All CIC pharmacies were prospectively enrolled in the teclistamab REMS program at the time education was deployed. Prescribing providers were REMS certified as well. Results: Between 1/2023 and 1/2024, a total of 8 patients were treated at 6 CIC within AHN. Of those 6 centers, 3 were non-rapid response CIC. Out of the eight patients treated at local infusion centers, starting with the fourth teclistamab dose, none experienced CRS events. No additional safety occurred, and no patients were subsequently hospitalized for teclistamab toxicities. Conclusions: Teclistamab can be safely administered at CIC, including centers without rapid response capabilities, starting with the 4th dose after prior ramp-up administration. Post-injection monitoring may be reduced without increased incidence of CRS-related toxicities. Our monitoring guide may serve as a model for the safe administration of teclistamab and other BiTEs in CIC. [Table: see text]

Efficacy and safety of chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy in hematologic malignancies: a living systematic review (protocol).

To determine the efficacy and safety of CAR-T therapy in the treatment of patients with hematologic malignancies, in comparison with other current therapies. A living systematic review. We will include randomized trials evaluating the effect of CAR-T therapy versus other active treatments, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, best supportive care or any other intervention in patients with hematologic malignancies. Non-randomized primary studies will be searched in case we found no direct evidence from randomized controlled trials. Two reviewers will independently screen each study for eligibility, extract data, and assess the risk of bias. Efficacy measures will include overall survival rate, overall response rate, complete response/remission (CR) rate, partial response/remission (PR) rate, relapse from CR, progression-free survival, and time from CAR-T infusion to transplantation. Safety measures will include serious adverse events, the incidence of cytokine release syndrome, graft-versus-host disease, neurotoxicity, and total adverse events. Quality of life will also be assessed. Meta-analyses will be carried out to summarize the results. We will apply the GRADE approach to assess the certainty of the evidence for each outcome. A living, web-based version of this review will be openly available until there is solid evidence to respond to the review objective. We will resubmit it for publication every time the conclusions change or whenever there are substantial updates.

The degree of HLA matching determines the incidence of cytokine release syndrome and associated nonrelapse mortality in matched related and unrelated allogeneic stem cell transplantation with post-transplant cyclophosphamide

Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) occurs frequently after haplo-identical allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT) with post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy), increasing nonrelapse mortality (NRM) and decreasing survival. Data on CRS in HLA-matched alloSCT are limited and effects of specific HLA-mismatches on CRS development unknown. We hypothesized that in HLA-matched alloSCT increasing degrees of HLA-mismatching influence CRS incidence, NRM and survival. Retrospective analysis of 126 HLA-matched PTCy-alloSCT patients showed that higher degrees of HLA-mismatching significantly increased CRS incidence (26%, 75% and 90% CRS with 12/12, 10/10 and 9/10 matched donors, respectively). Maximum temperature during CRS increased with higher HLA-mismatch. Specific associations between HLA-mismatches and CRS could be determined. Grade 2 CRS and CRS-induced grade 3 fever were associated with significantly increased NRM (p < 0.001 and p = 0.003, respectively) and inferior survival (p < 0.001 and p = 0.005, respectively). NRM was mainly caused by disease conditions that may be considered CRS-induced inflammatory responses (encephalopathy, cryptogenic organizing pneumonia and multi-organ failure).

Patterns of CRS with teclistamab in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma with or without prior T-cell redirection therapy

AbstractTeclistamab (Tec) is a first-in-class BCMA × CD3 bispecific T-cell engager antibody approved for treating multiple myeloma progressing after at least 4 lines of therapy. The objective of this study was to evaluate the rate of cytokine release syndrome (CRS) in patients who were treated with commercial Tec and had prior exposure to other T-cell redirection therapies. A retrospective chart review was performed to identify patients who completed the Tec step-up dosing phase between November 2022 and November 2023. Patients were divided into 2 cohorts based on prior exposure to T-cell redirection therapy (cohort 1: T-cell redirection therapy experienced; cohort 2: T-cell redirection therapy naïve). The primary objective was to compare the differences in the rates of CRS between the 2 cohorts. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to assess the association between CRS rates with Tec and prior treatment with T-cell redirection therapy. A total of 72 patients were included in the analysis (27 in cohort 1 and 45 in cohort 2). The CRS rates were significantly lower in cohort 1 (37%, n = 10) compared with cohort 2 (80%, n = 36; P = .0004). Based on multivariate logistic regression analysis, patients without prior exposure to T-cell redirection therapy (cohort 2) had about a fourfold increase in the incidence of CRS (95% confidence interval, 1.40-14.90; P = .0002) with Tec. In our study, prior exposure to T-cell redirection therapy reduced the risk of CRS with Tec during the step-up dosing phase. This observation will allow for the optimization of CRS prophylactic strategies for Tec.

Associations of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor with toxicities and efficacy of chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy in relapsed or refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Few studies have reported the associations of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) with cytokine release syndrome (CRS), neurotoxic events (NEs) and efficacy after chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy for relapsed or refractory (R/R) B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL). We present a retrospective study of 67 patients with R/R B-ALL who received anti-CD19 CAR T-cell therapy, 41 (61.2%) patients received G-CSF (G-CSF group), while 26 (38.8%) did not (non-G-CSF group). Patients had similar duration of grade 3–4 neutropenia between the two groups. The incidences of CRS and NEs were higher in G-CSF group, while no differences in severity were found. Further stratified analysis showed that the incidence and severity of CRS were not associated with G-CSF administration in patients with low bone marrow (BM) tumor burden. None of the patients with low BM tumor burden developed NEs. However, there was a significant increase in the incidence of CRS after G-CSF administration in patients with high BM tumor burden. The duration of CRS in patients who used G-CSF was longer. There were no significant differences in response rates at 1 and 3 months after CAR T-cell infusion, as well as overall survival (OS) between the two groups. In conclusion, our results showed that G-CSF administration was not associated with the incidence or severity of CRS in patients with low BM tumor burden, but the incidence of CRS was higher after G-CSF administration in patients with high BM tumor burden. The duration of CRS was prolonged in G-CSF group. G-CSF administration was not associated with the efficacy of CAR T-cell therapy.

Abstract P66: Off-The-Shelf Epstein Barr Virus Specific T Cells Armored with B7-H3-Targeting Chimeric Antigen Receptors Is an Effective and Safe Tumor- Agnostic Therapy For B7-H3 Positive Solid Malignancies

Abstract In contrast to its limited expression in normal tissues, the B7 homolog 3 protein (B7-H3) is over-expressed in many human tumors, making it an attractive target for chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy. To address the technical challenges limiting broader patient access to autologous CAR T cell therapy, we armoured Epstein-Barr Virus Specific T Cells (EBVSTs) with CARs as an off-the-shelf therapy against solid tumors. We identified and utilised a nanobody as the domain specifically targeting B7-H3 in our CAR construct to reduce the stability issues associated with scFv-based domains. Our B7H3.CAR armored EBVSTs demonstrated potent in-vitro and in-vivo activity against multiple B7-H3 positive tumor and patient-derived xenografts models. Analysis of human healthy tissues and tumors microarrays indicated that B7-H3 expression, while elevated in patient tumors, was differentially low in healthy tissues. Consistent with this, mouse T cells expressing a murine equivalent of our B7H3.CAR displayed good on-target off-tumor safety in immunocompetent mice bearing syngeneic tumors. Further in-vitro evaluation revealed that while human T, B and NK cells were unaffected by B7H3.CAR EBVSTs targeting, monocytes were readily targeted due to the upregulation of B7-H3. Consequent to this targeting and depletion of B7-H3 positive human myeloid cells which are key mediators of CRS, a low incidence of cytokine release syndrome was observed in humanized mice after B7H3.CAR EBVST treatment. Lastly, we showed that B7H3.CAR EBVSTs can target myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) that express B7-H3 and in doing so, alleviate MDSC-driven immune suppression. Our findings demonstrate that our nanobody-based B7H3.CAR EBVSTs present not only an effective and safe off-the-shelf approach for targeting any B7-H3-positive solid tumor while also addressing challenges that hindered the clinical development of CAR T cells in such indications. Citation Format: Siok Ping Yeo, Lindsay Kua, Jin Wei Tan, Joanna Kristyn Lim, Fiona Wong, May Delos Santos, Chek Meng Poh, Angeline Goh XH, Xin Yu Koh, Xiao Hua Zhou, Rajarethinam R, Qing Feng Chen, Zhisheng Her, Ivan D Horak, Lionel Low, Kar Wai Tan. Off-The-Shelf Epstein Barr Virus Specific T Cells Armored with B7-H3-Targeting Chimeric Antigen Receptors Is an Effective and Safe Tumor- Agnostic Therapy For B7-H3 Positive Solid Malignancies [abstract]. In: Proceedings of Frontiers in Cancer Science; 2023 Nov 6-8; Singapore. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(8_Suppl):Abstract nr P66.