Incidence Of Any Adverse Events Research Articles

The Safety of Cold Versus Hot Snare Polypectomy in Polyps 10-20 mm: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Colonoscopy remains the primary method for preventing colorectal cancer. Traditionally, hot snare polypectomy (HSP) was the method of choice for removing polyps larger than 5 mm. Yet, for polyps smaller than 10 mm, cold snare polypectomy (CSP) has become the favored approach. Lately, the use of CSP has expanded to include the removal of sessile polyps that are between 10 and 20 mm in size. Our systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the safety of cold snare polypectomy (CSP) compared to hot snare polypectomy (HSP) for resecting polyps measuring 10-20 mm. We searched the Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE), Embase, and Cochrane databases up to April 2020 to find studies that directly compared CSP to HSP for polyps larger than 10 mm. Our main focus was on assessing the risk of delayed bleeding after polypectomy; a secondary focus was the incidence of any adverse events that required medical intervention post procedure. Our search yielded three comparative studies, two observational studies, and one randomized controlled trial (RCT), together encompassing 1,193 polypectomy procedures. Of these, 485 were performed using CSP and 708 with HSP. The pooled odds ratio (OR) for post-polypectomy bleeding (PPB) was 0.36 (95% confidence interval {CI}: 0.02, 7.13), with a Cochran Q test P-value of 0.11 and an I2 of 53%. For the risk of any adverse events necessitating medical care, the pooled OR was 0.15 (95% CI: 0.01, 2.29), with a Cochran Q test P-value of 0.21 and an I2 of 35%. The quality of the two observational studies was deemed moderate, and the RCT was only available in abstract form, preventing quality assessment. Our analysis suggests that there is no significant difference in the incidence of delayed post-polypectomy bleeding or other adverse events requiring medical attention between CSP and HSP for polyps measuring 10-20 mm.

Efficacy and safety of bamlanivimab in patients with COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) have shown clinical benefits against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Several studies have reported the use of bamlanivimab as a promising treatment option for COVID-19. To synthesize the latest evidence for the efficacy and safety of bamlanivimab alone in the treatment of adult patients with COVID-19. A literature search was conducted in PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, medRxiv, and Google Scholar using "SARS-CoV-2", "COVID-19", "LY-CoV555", and "Bamlanivimab" keywords up to January 25, 2023. The quality of included studies was assessed using the Cochrane bias tools. The Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software version 3.0 was used to analyze the data. A total of 30 studies involving 47368 patients were included. A significant difference was observed between the bamlanivimab and standard of care/placebo groups in terms of mortality rate [risk ratio (RR) = 50, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.36-0.70], hospitalization rate (RR = 0.51; 95%CI: 0.39-0.68), and emergency department (ED) visits (RR = 0.69; 95%CI: 0.47-0.99); while the two groups exhibited no significant difference in terms of intensive care unit (ICU) admission (P > 0.05). Compared to other mAbs, bamlanivimab was associated with a higher rate of hospitalization (RR = 1.44; 95%CI: 1.07-1.94). However, no significant difference was detected between the bamlanivimab and other mAbs groups in terms of mortality rate, ICU admission, and ED (P > 0.05). The incidence of any adverse events was similar between the bamlanivimab and control groups (P > 0.05). Although the results suggest the efficacy and safety of bamlanivimab in COVID-19 patients, further research is required to confirm the efficacy of this drug for the current circulating SARS-CoV-2 variants.

A randomized, blind, parallel controlled phase I clinical trial to evaluate the safety and preliminary immunogenicity of 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine in healthy people aged 2 years and older

BackgroundDespite some progress in pneumococcal immunization, the global burden of pneumococcal infection remains high, and pneumococcal disease remains a public health concern. Studies in China and abroad have found that 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPV23) vaccination can effectively prevent invasive pneumococcal disease. This phase Ⅰ clinical study assessed the safety and immunogenicity of a PPV23 vaccine candidate. MethodsAll subjects were randomly assigned to receive one dose intramuscular injection of experimental vaccine or control vaccine at a ratio of 1:1. The incidence of any adverse events was observed within 30 min, 0–7 days and 8–28 days post vaccination and the incidence of abnormal blood biochemical and blood routine indicators were tested on the 4th day post vaccination, the incidence of serious adverse events (SAEs) at 6 months post vaccination was recorded. Blood samples were collected prior to vaccination and on the 28th day post vaccination, and serum antibodies were detected by enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). ResultsThe most common adverse reaction was pain at the injection site, followed by erythema. There was no significant difference of the incidence of systemic adverse reactions between the two vaccine groups. The adverse reactions observed in the trial were all common vaccination-related reactions, and no serious adverse reactions were observed. Compared to pre-vaccination, the (geometric mean concentrations) GMCs of IgG (immunoglobulin G) specific antibody against each serotype were all increased in the experimental group and the control group, there were statistical differences in seroconversion rates of serotypes 4 and 20 between the two vaccine groups. ConclusionThis clinical study showed good safety of the PPV23 vaccine candidate produced by Ab&b Biotechnology Co., Ltd.JS had good safety after vaccination in people aged 2 years and older. At the same time, good immunogenicity was also demonstrated.

Effects of rifampicin on the pharmacokinetics and safety of carotegrast methyl in healthy subjects: A randomized 2 × 2 crossover study.

To evaluate the effect of the combination of carotegrast methyl with rifampicin, a potent inhibitor of organic anion transporter polypeptide, on the pharmacokinetics (PKs), safety and tolerability of carotegrast methyl. In this 2 × 2 crossover study in 20 healthy Japanese adults, 10 subjects received carotegrast methyl 960 mg and rifampicin 600 mg on day 1 and received carotegrast methyl 960 mg on day 8. The subjects in the other sequence received the same treatments but in the opposite order. The 90% confidence interval (CI) of the geometric mean ratio of the Cmax and AUC0-t for carotegrast, the main active metabolite of carotegrast methyl, with/without rifampicin was calculated. If the 90% CI fell within the range of 0.80-1.25, this indicated the absence of any drug-drug interaction. Adverse events (AEs) were monitored. The geometric mean ratios (90% CI) of the Cmax and AUC0-t for carotegrast with/without rifampicin were 4.78 (3.64-6.29) and 5.59 (4.60-6.79), respectively, indicating that carotegrast has a PK interaction with rifampicin. The combination with rifampicin increased the exposure of carotegrast and also that of its metabolites. The incidence of any AEs with/without rifampicin was five (25.0%) and one (5.0%), respectively. Coadministration of carotegrast methyl with rifampicin significantly increased the exposure of carotegrast compared with carotegrast methyl administration alone. In this single dose study, the incidence of AEs of carotegrast methyl with rifampicin increased compared with carotegrast methyl alone, but the incidence of adverse drug reactions did not increase with combination administration.

Protocol of a first-in-human clinical trial to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and preliminary efficacy of the bispecific CD276xCD3 antibody CC-3 in patients with colorectal cancer (CoRe_CC-3).

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer worldwide in men and women. In the metastasized stage, treatment options and prognosis are limited. To address the high medical need of this patient population, we generated a CD276xCD3 bispecific antibody termed CC-3. CD276 is expressed on CRC cells and on tumor vessels, thereby allowing for a "dual" anticancer effect. This first-in-human clinical study is planned as a prospective multicenter trial, enrolling patients with metastatic CRC after three lines of therapy. During the dose-escalation part, initially, an accelerated titration design with single-patient cohorts is employed. Here, each patient will receive a fixed dose level (starting with 50 µg for the first patient); however, between patients, dose level may be increased by up to 100%, depending on the decision of a safety review committee. Upon occurrence of any adverse events (AEs) grade ≥2, dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), or reaching a dose level of ≥800 µg, the escalation will switch to a standard 3 + 3 dose design. After maximum tolerated dose (MTD) has been determined, defined as no more than one of the six patients experiencing DLT, an additional 14 patients receive CC-3 at the MTD level in the dose-expansion phase. Primary endpoints are incidence and severity of AEs, as well as the best objective response to the treatment according to response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) 1.1. Secondary endpoints include overall safety, efficacy, survival, quality of life, and pharmacokinetic investigations. The CD276xCD3 study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Medical Faculty of the Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf and the Paul-Ehrlich-Institut (P00702). Clinical trial results will be published in peer-reviewed journals. Trial registration numbers: ClinicalTrials.cov Registry (NCT05999396) and EU ClinicalTrials Registry (EU trial number 2022-503084-15-00).

Comparison of Sleeve Gastrectomy vs Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (SG) and laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) are widely used bariatric procedures for which comparative efficacy and safety remain unclear. To compare perioperative outcomes in SG and RYGB. In this registry-based, multicenter randomized clinical trial (Bypass Equipoise Sleeve Trial), baseline and perioperative data for patients undergoing bariatric surgery from October 6, 2015, to March 31, 2022, were analyzed. Patients were from university, regional, county, and private hospitals in Sweden (n = 20) and Norway (n = 3). Adults (aged ≥18 years) eligible for bariatric surgery with body mass indexes (BMIs; calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared) of 35 to 50 were studied. Laparoscopic SG or RYGB. Perioperative complications were analyzed as all adverse events and serious adverse events (Clavien-Dindo grade >IIIb). Ninety-day mortality was also assessed. A total of 1735 of 14 182 eligible patients (12%; 1282 [73.9%] female; mean (SD) age, 42.9 [11.1] years; mean [SD] BMI, 40.8 [3.7]) were included in the study. Patients were randomized and underwent SG (n = 878) or RYGB (n = 857). The mean (SD) operating time was shorter in those undergoing SG vs RYGB (47 [18] vs 68 [25] minutes; P < .001). The median (IQR) postoperative hospital stay was 1 (1-1) day in both groups. The 30-day readmission rate was 3.1% after SG and 4.0% after RYGB (P = .33). There was no 90-day mortality. The 30-day incidence of any adverse event was 40 (4.6%) and 54 (6.3%) in the SG and RYGB groups, respectively (odds ratio, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.47-1.08; P = .11). Corresponding figures for serious adverse events were 15 (1.7%) for the SG group and 23 (2.7%) for the RYGB group (odds ratio, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.33-1.22; P = .19). This randomized clinical trial of 1735 patients undergoing primary bariatric surgery found that both SG and RYGB were performed with a low perioperative risk without clinically significant differences between groups. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02767505.

Sorafenib plus transarterial chemoembolization vs sorafenib alone for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Although the past decade has seen remarkable advances in treatment options for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), the dismal overall prognosis still envelops HCC patients. Several comparative trials have been conducted to study whether transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) could improve clinical outcomes in patients receiving sorafenib for advanced HCC; however, the findings have been inconsistent. To study the potential synergies and safety of sorafenib plus TACE vs sorafenib alone for treating advanced HCC, by performing a systematic review and meta-analysis. This study was conducted following the PRISMA statement. A systematic literature search was conducted using the Cochrane Library, Embase, PubMed, and Web of Science databases. Data included in the present work were collected from patients diagnosed with advanced HCC receiving sorafenib plus TACE or sorafenib alone. Data synthesis and meta-analysis were conducted using Review Manager software. The present study included 2780 patients from five comparative clinical trials (1 was randomized control trial and 4 were retrospective studies). It was found that patients receiving sorafenib plus TACE had better prognoses in terms of overall survival (OS), with a combined hazard ratio (HR) of 0.65 [95% confidence interval (95%CI): 0.46-0.93, P = 0.02, n = 2780]. Consistently, progression free survival (PFS) and time to progression (TTP) differed significantly between the sorafenib plus TACE arm and sorafenib arm (PFS: HR = 0.62, 95%CI: 0.40-0.96, P = 0.03, n = 443; TTP: HR = 0.73, 95%CI: 0.64-0.83, P < 0.00001, n = 2451). Disease control rate (DCR) was also significantly increased by combination therapy (risk ratio = 1.36, 95%CI: 1.02-1.81, P = 0.04, n = 641). Regarding safety, the incidence of any adverse event (AE) was increased due to the addition of TACE; however, no significant difference was found in grade ≥ 3 AEs. The combination of sorafenib with TACE has superior efficacy to sorafenib monotherapy, as evidenced by prolonged OS, PFS, and TTP, as well as increased DCR. Additional high-quality trials are essential to further validate the clinical benefit of this combination in the treatment of advanced HCC.

Efficacy and effect on lipid profiles of Ainuovirine-based regimen versus Efavirenz-based regimen in treatment-naïve people with HIV-1 at week 24: A real-world, retrospective, multi-center cohort study.

This study aimed to compare the efficacy and effect on lipid profiles of Ainuovirine (ANV)- and efavirenz (EFV) -based regimens in treatment-naïve people living with HIV-1 (PLWH) at week 24. The proportion of PLWH achieving HIV-1 RNA < the limit of quantification in the ANV group was significantly higher than that in the EFV group (89.18% vs. 76.04%, P = 0.002). The mean change of log10 HIV-1 RNA from baseline was greater (-4.34 vs. -4.18, P < 0.001), the median change from baseline in CD4+ T cell count increased more (106.00 cells/μL vs. 92.00 cells/μL, P = 0.007) in the ANV group, while the CD4+/CD8+ ratio was similar (0.15 vs. 0.20, P = 0.167) between the two groups. The mean changes from baseline in total cholesterol (-0.02 for ANV vs. 0.25 mmol/L for EFV, P < 0.001), triglyceride (-0.14 for ANV vs. 0.11 mmol/L for EFV, P = 0.024), and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (-0.07 for ANV vs. 0.15 mmol/L for EFV, P < 0.001) was significantly different between the two groups. The percentage of patients with improved lipid profiles was significantly higher in the ANV group (37.44 %) than in the EFV group (29.55%, P = 0.0495). The incidence of any adverse events in the ANV group was significantly lower than that in the EFV group at week 12 (6.2% vs. 30.7%, P < 0.001) and was comparable at week 24 (3.6% vs. 5.5%, P = 0.28). The ANV-based regimen was well tolerated and lipid-friendly in treatment-naïve PLWH.

Once-weekly Insulin Icodec Versus Once-daily Long-acting Insulin for Type II Diabetes: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Insulin icodec is a novel basal insulin analog with once-weekly subcutaneous administration. We aim to estimate the efficacy and safety of insulin icodec vs long-acting insulin (insulin glargine and degludec) in type II diabetic patients. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis synthesizing randomized controlled trials (RCTs), which were retrieved by systematically searching PubMed, Web of Science, SCOPUS, and Cochrane through May 29, 2023. We used RevMan V. 5.4 to pool dichotomous data using risk ratio (RR) and continuous data using mean difference (MD) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). Our primary outcome was glycated hemoglobin (HbA1C) change. We included 7 RCTs with a total of 3183 patients. Insulin icodec was associated with significantly decreased HbA1C (MD: -0.15 with 95% CI [-0.24, -0.06], P = .002) and increased percentage of time with glucose in range (TIR) (MD: 4.06 with 95% CI [2.06, 6.06], P = .0001). However, insulin icodec was associated with increased body weight (MD: 0.57 with 95% CI [0.45, 0.70], P = .00001). Also, there was no difference regarding any serious adverse events (AEs) (RR: 0.96 with 95% CI [0.76, 1.20], P = .7) or AEs leading to withdrawal (RR: 1.54 with 95% CI [0.84, 2.82], P = .16). However, insulin icodec was associated with increased any AEs incidence (RR: 1.06 with 95% CI [1.01, 1.12], P = .02). Insulin icodec was associated with decreased HbA1C, increased TIR, with similar hypoglycemic and serious AEs. However, it was also associated with increased body weight and the incidence of any AEs.

Superiority and cost-effectiveness of monthly extended-release buprenorphine versus daily standard of care medication: a pragmatic, parallel-group, open-label, multicentre, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial

Daily methadone maintenance or buprenorphine treatment is the standard-of-care (SoC) medication for opioid use disorder (OUD). Subcutaneously injected, extended-release buprenorphine (BUP-XR) may be more effective-but there has been no superiority evaluation. This pragmatic, parallel-group, open-label, multi-centre, effectiveness superiority randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial was conducted at five National Health Service community-based treatment clinics in England and Scotland. Participants (adults aged ≥ 18 years; all meeting DSM-5 diagnostic criteria for moderate or severe OUD at admission to their current maintenance treatment episode) were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive continued daily SoC (liquid methadone (usual dose range: 60-120mg) or sublingual/transmucosal buprenorphine (usual dose range: 8-24mg) for 24 weeks; or monthly BUP-XR (Sublocade;® two injections of 300mg, then four maintenance injections of 100mg or 300mg, with maintenance dose selected by response and preference) for 24 weeks. In the intent-to-treat population (senior statistician blinded to blinded to treatment group allocation), and with a seven-day grace period after randomisation, the primary endpoint was the count of days abstinent from non-medical opioids between days 8-168 (i.e., weeks 2-24; range: 0-161 days). Safety was reported for the intention-to- treat population. Adopting a broad societal perspective inclusive of criminal justice, NHS and personal social service costs, a trial-based cost-utility analysis estimated the Incremental Cost-effectiveness Ratio (ICER) per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) of BUP-XR versus SoC at the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence threshold. The study was registered EudraCT (2018-004460-63) and ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05164549), and is completed. Between Aug 9, 2019 and Nov 2, 2021, 314 participants were randomly allocated to receive SoC (n=156) or BUP-XR (n=158). Participants were abstinent from opioids for an adjusted mean of 104.37 days (standard error [SE] 9.89; range: 0-161 days) in the SoC group and an adjusted mean of 123.43 days (SE 4.76; range: 24-161 days) in the BUP-XR group (adjusted incident rate ratio [IRR] 1.18, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.05-1.33; p-value 0.004). The incidence of any adverse event was higher in the BUP-XR group than the SoC group (128 [81.0%] of 158 participants versus 67 [42.9%] of 156 participants, respectively-most commonly rapidly-resolving (mild-moderate range) pain from drug administration in the BUP-XR group (121 [26.9%] of 450 adverse events). There were 11 serious adverse events (7.0%) in the 158 participants in the BUP-XR group, and 18 serious adverse events (11.5%) in the 156 participants in the SoC group-none judged to be related to study treatment. The BUP-XR treatment group had a mean incremental cost of £1033 (95% central range [CR]-1189 to 3225) and was associated with a mean incremental QALY of 0.02 (95% CR 0.00-0.05), and an ICER of £47,540 (0.37 probability of being cost-effective at the £30,000/QALY gained willingness-to-pay threshold). However, BUP-XR dominated the SoC among participants who were rated more severe at study baseline, and among participants in maintenance treatment for more that 28 days at study enrolment. Evaluated against the daily oral SoC, monthly BUP-XR is clinically superior, delivering greater abstinence from opioids, and with a comparable safety profile. BUP-XR was not cost-effective in a base case cost-utility analysis using the societal perspective, but it was more effective and less costly (dominant) among participants with more severe OUD, or those whose current treatment episode was longer than 28 days. Further trials are needed to evaluate if BUP-XR is associated with better clinical and health economic outcomes over the longer term. Indivior.

Effectiveness and tolerability of trimetazidine 80mg once daily in patients with chronic coronary syndrome: the V-GOOD observational study

Abstract Background Trimetazidine (TMZ) has shown anti-ischemic and anti-anginal effects by shifting the production of ATP from free fatty acid to glucose oxidation. Few clinical studies have looked at the effectiveness and tolerability of a new presentation of TMZ (80mg once daily) in real-world practice. Purpose The V-GOOD study was conducted in routine clinical practice to evaluate the effect of adding TMZ 80mg OD to treat patients with angina or angina equivalents despite treatment with background anti-anginal therapies. Methods This multicenter, prospective, observational study recruited symptomatic adult outpatients with a confirmed diagnosis of stable angina to whom physicians had decided to prescribe TMZ 80mg OD in 70 health facilities across Brazil from October 2021 to June 2022. Data on the number of angina attacks, the prevalence of angina-free patients, severity of angina (CCS class), impairment in daily activities, treatment adherence, tolerability, and physician and patient satisfaction were collected at baseline (V1) and at 1-month (V2) and 3-month (V3) follow-up visits. Patients with known hypersensitivity to TMZ, Parkinson's disease, related movement disorders, and severe or moderate renal impairment were excluded. Results 1,029 patients (57.9% women) with a mean age of 66.8±10.3 years were included, and 959 (93.2%) completed all three planned visits. Diabetes (53.7%), dyslipidemia (85.1%), and hypertension (85.1%) were the most frequent cardiovascular risk factors; 55.7% of patients had angina CCS class II and 25.1% class III. At V1, the mean number of angina attacks per week was 5.1±3.7 despite anti-anginal therapy, including beta-blockers (82%), CCBs (23%), and nitrates (22%). Following the addition of TMZ 80 OD, it decreased to 3.4±3.3 attacks per week at V2 and 3.5±6.4 at V3 (P&amp;lt;.001). The prevalence of angina-free patients increased from 15.4% (V1) to 73% at V3 (P&amp;lt;.001); accordingly, there was a significant decrease in the proportion of patients with limiting angina (CCS 3 or 4) from 27.3% (V1) to 8.7% (V3) (P&amp;lt;.001). The assessment of impairment in daily activities by a visual scale (ranging from 0 to 10) showed a significant improvement from V1 (5.1±2.2) to V3 (2.1±2.2) (P&amp;lt;.001). Patient adherence to the anti-anginal treatment was excellent, with only 4.4% of patients reporting forgetting to take the drug. The incidence of any adverse event was 2.1% on V3, with 1.1% attributed to the drug. In the end, satisfaction with treatment was classified as satisfactory/very satisfactory by 97.1% of patients and 91.0% of doctors. Conclusion The study confirms that the new formulation of TMZ 80mg OD when added to anti-anginal therapy in patients with symptomatic chronic coronary syndrome effectively reduced the angina frequency and severity, improved functional class, yielded a significant proportion of patients free of angina, decreased physical limitation, and it was well tolerated.

The safety and efficacy of quadruple ultra-low-dose combination (quadpill) for hypertension treatment: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Abstract Background Hypertension is a significant healthcare burden, with an average global prevalence of 1.28 billion adults aged between 30 -79 years old. Using antihypertensive drug combinations is considered more effective in controlling elevated blood pressure than monotherapy; however, psychological factors of the patients and the physicians’ caution from the drugs' adverse effects are still barriers against antihypertensive drug combinations. Quadpill, a single pill containing a quadruple combination of quarter doses of four antihypertensive agents, has been investigated for hypertension treatment. Purpose We aim to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the quadruple ultra-low-dose combination of antihypertensive drugs (quadpill) in patients with hypertension. Methods We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis synthesizing randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating quadpill versus monotherapy or placebo in patients with hypertension, which were retrieved by systematically searching: PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, SCOPUS, and Cochrane through February 17th, 2023. Continuous and dichotomous outcomes were pooled using mean difference (MD) and risk ratio (RR) along with confidence interval (CI), using Revman V. 5.4 software. Results Four RCTs with a total of 781 patients (372 in the quadpill group and 425 in the control group) were included in our analysis. Quadpill was effective in controlling automated systolic blood pressure on the short-term (4-6 weeks) (RR: -13.00 with 95% CI [-17.22, -8.78], P= 0.00001) and on the long-term (12 weeks) (RR: -6.18 with 95% CI [-9.35, -3.01], P= 0.0001). Quadpill was also effective in controlling automated diastolic blood pressure on the short-term (4-6 weeks) (MD: -8.15 with 95% CI [-9.42, -6.89], P= 0.00001) and on the long-term (12 weeks) (MD: -6.35 with 95% CI [-10.37, -2.33], P= 0.002). Moreover, patients in the quadpill group significantly achieved target blood pressure &amp;lt; 140/90 (RR: 1.77 with 95% CI [1.26, 2.51], P= 0.001), compared to the control group. Finally, there was no difference between the quadpill and the control groups regarding the safety outcomes, including the incidence of any adverse events (RR: 1.36 with 95% CI [0.86, 2.15], P= 0.19), any serious adverse events (RR: 1.13 with 95% CI [0.56, 2.25], P= 0.74), and any adverse events leading to drug discontinuation (RR: 0.89 with 95% CI [0.19, 4.11], P= 0.88). Conclusion Quadruple ultra-low-dose combination of antihypertensive drugs (quadpill) was effective and safe for hypertension treatment. However, further large-scale multicenter RCTs are still warranted before endorsement in the clinical practice as current evidence is based on a small number of RCTs and quadpill holds a promising strategy for hypertension treatment.Figure 1Figure 2

Effects of a high-protein, increased-fibre, dry diet supplemented with omega-3 fatty acids on quality of life in dogs undergoing chemotherapy.

Quality of life (QOL) in dogs with cancer is a key consideration in the assessment of cancer treatment options. Despite interest in dietary strategies to improve management of oncology patients, there have been very few clinical studies showing the impact of diet on adverse effects of chemotherapy in dogs. This study was a randomised, controlled, double-blinded, multicenter clinical trial to investigate a high-protein, increased-fibre diet supplemented with omega-3 fatty acids, for dogs with cancer undergoing standard-of-care chemotherapy. Client-owned dogs with newly diagnosed grade 2 or higher mast cell tumours (or non-resectable/incompletely resected tumours) or multicentric lymphoma were randomised to receive the test diet (n = 24) or control diet (n = 21) for 8 weeks. Primary outcomes were QOL assessments, faecal scores, and blood concentrations of C-reactive protein and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1. Of 12 QOL parameters, 10 significantly improved from baseline to Week 8 in the test group compared with one in the control group. However, differences between the two groups were only statistically significant for 'frequency of signs of illness' (P = .009). There were no significant differences in the incidence of any adverse events, including gastrointestinal adverse events or clinically significant differences in laboratory parameters or faecal scores between the two groups. The absence of an observed negative impact of the test diet, combined with the magnitude of QOL improvements associated with the diet, suggest that a larger trial is warranted.

Real-World Safety of COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

With the mass vaccination program for COVID-19 mRNA vaccines, there has been sufficient real-world study (RWS) on the topic to summarize their safety in the total population and in immunocompromised (IC) patients who were excluded from phase 3 clinical trials. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the safety of COVID-19 mRNA vaccines, with a total of 5,132,799 subjects from 122 articles. In the case of the total population vaccinated with first, second, and third doses, the pooled incidence of any adverse events (AEs) was 62.20%, 70.39%, and 58.60%; that of any local AEs was 52.03%, 47.99%, and 65.00%; that of any systemic AEs was 29.07%, 47.86%, and 32.71%. Among the immunocompromised patients, the pooled odds ratio of any AEs, any local AEs, and systemic AEs were slightly lower than or similar to those of the healthy controls at 0.60 (95% CI: 0.33-1.11), 0.19 (95% CI: 0.10-0.37), and 0.36 (95% CI: 0.25-0.54), with pooled incidences of 51.95%, 38.82%, and 31.00%, respectively. The spectrum of AEs associated with the vaccines was broad, but most AEs were transient, self-limiting, and mild to moderate. Moreover, younger adults, women, and people with prior SARS-CoV-2 infection were more likely to experience AEs.

Transarterial chemoembolization with or without multikinase inhibitors for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Background Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) testing the combination therapy of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) plus multikinase inhibitor (MKI) in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) have yielded inconsistent results. Methods In this work, a systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to compare the TACE+MKI combination therapy versus TACE monotherapy in HCC patients with time to progression (TTP) adopted as primary outcome. Results A total of 10 RCTs comprising 2837 patients receiving combination therapy (TACE plus sorafenib, brivanib, orantinib or apatinib) were included. TACE+MKI significantly prolonged TTP (hazard ratio [HR] 0.74, 95% CI 0.62-0.89, p=0.001) versus TACE monotherapy. Subgroup analysis suggested MKI administration before TACE might be preferable to post-TACE MKI for TTP. TACE+MKI also increased objective response rate (ORR) (risk ratio [RR] 1.17, 95% CI 1.03-1.32, p=0.01), but failed to improve overall survival (OS) (HR 0.98, 95% CI 0.86-1.13, p=0.82) and progression-free survival (PFS) (HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.50-1.12, p=0.16). The incidence of any adverse event (AE) did not significantly differ between TACE+MKI and TACE groups (RR 1.17, 95% CI 0.96-1.42, p=0.01), while serious AEs showed significant difference (RR 1.41, 95% CI 1.26-1.59, p&amp;lt;0.0001). Nevertheless, these AEs showing significant difference were mainly associated with MKI toxicities rather than TACE. Conclusions TACE+MKI combination therapy improved TTP and ORR but not OS and PFS in patients with unresectable HCC. Further high-quality trials are needed to verify these clinical benefits, and our findings could be very informative for future trial design.

Weight loss efficiency and safety of tirzepatide: A Systematic review.

Tirzeptide is a novel glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor (GLP-1) and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) drug, which shows good efficiency for weight loss. Therefore, we aim to investigate the efficacy and safety of tirzepatide for weight loss in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and obesity patients in this meta-analysis study. Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, Clinical Trials, and Web of Science were searched from inception to October 5, 2022. All randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included. The odds ratio (OR) was calculated using fixed-effects or random-effects models by Review Manager 5.3 software. In total, ten studies (12 reports) involving 9,873 patients were identified. A significant loss body weight in the tirzepatide group versus the placebo by -9.81 kg (95% CI (-12.09, -7.52), GLP-1 RAs by -1.05 kg (95% CI (-1.48, -0.63), and insulin by -1.93 kg (95% CI (-2.81, -1.05), respectively. In sub-analysis, the body weight of patients was significantly reduced in three tirzepatide doses (5 mg, 10 mg, and 15 mg) when compared with those of the placebo/GLP-1 RA/insulin. In terms of safety, the incidence of any adverse events and adverse events leading to study drug discontinuation was higher in the tirzepatide group, but the incidence of serious adverse events and hypoglycaemia was lower. Additionally, the gastrointestinal adverse events (including diarrhea, nausea, vomiting and decreased appetite) of tirzepatide were higher than those of placebo/basal insulin, but similar to GLP-1 RAs. In conclusion, tirzeptide can significantly reduce the weight of T2DM and patient with obesity, and it is a potential therapeutic regimen for weight-loss, but we need to be vigilant about its gastrointestinal reaction.

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Tuberculous Preventative Therapy Adverse Events.

Tuberculosis preventive therapy (TPT) is a key part of the WHO's end TB strategy. However, the occurrence of potentially serious adverse events (AE) is a limitation of TPT regimens. We conducted a systemic review and metanalysis to estimate the incidence of AE and hepatotoxicity with various TPT regimens to help inform clinical decision making. We searched MEDLINE, Cochrane, Health Star and EMBASE from 1952 to April 2021 for studies reporting AE associated with TPT. Included studies reported AE stratified by regimen and provided the number of participants receiving each regimen. We used a random-effect model to meta-analyze the cumulative incidence of AE. We included 175 publications describing TPT-related AE in 277 cohorts. Among adults, the incidence of any AE, and hepatotoxicity leading to drug discontinuation was 3.7% and 1.1% respectively, compared to 0.4% and 0.02% respectively in children. The highest incidence of any AE, and AE leading to drug discontinuation was with 3 months isoniazid and rifapentine (3HP) and the lowest was with 4 months rifampin (4R). 4R also had the lowest incidence of hepato-toxic AE and drug discontinuation due to hepato-toxic AE. 3HP also had a low incidence of hepato-toxic AE. Although our study was limited by variability in methods and quality of AE reporting in the studies reviewed, pediatric populations had a very low incidence of AE with all TPT regimens reviewed. In adults, compared to mono-H regimens all rifamycin-based regimens were safer, although 4R had the lowest incidence of TPT-related AE of all types and of hepatotoxicity.

Effect of Prophylactic Fibrinogen Concentrate In Scoliosis Surgery (EFISS): a study protocol of two-arm, randomised trial

IntroductionFibrinogen is one of the essential coagulation factors. Preoperative lower plasma fibrinogen level has been associated with higher blood loss. Scoliosis surgery presents a challenge for the anaesthetic team, one...

PO-04-108 THE EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF ETRIPAMIL NASAL SPRAY FOR THE TREATMENT OF ACUTE PAROXYSMAL SUPRAVENTRICULAR TACHYCARDIA: A META-ANALYSIS OF RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS

Paroxysmal Supraventricular Tachycardia (PSVT) treatment requires medically supervised intervention. This is derived from the lack of effective and safe self-administrated treatment for PSVT. Etripamil is a novel short-acting calcium channel blocker with a rapid intranasal spray and shows promising potential for the unsupervised treatment of PSVT, especially in the dosage of 70 mg. We aim to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Etripamil for the acute conversion of PSVT. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis synthesizing randomized controlled trials (RCTs), which were retrieved by systematically searching: PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, SCOPUS, and Cochrane through December 1st, 2022. RevMan version 5.4 software was used to pool dichotomous outcomes using risk ratio (RR) presented with the corresponding confidence interval (CI) while using the fixed-effects model. Three RCTs with a total of 496 patients (296 in the etripamil group and 200 in the placebo group) were included in our analysis. Etripamil was effective for PSVT conversion at 15 minutes (RR: 1.84 with 95% CI [1.37, 2.48]), 30 minutes (RR: 1.86 with 95% CI [1.42, 2.44]), and at 60 minutes after the drug administration (RR: 1.25 with 95% CI [1.05, 1.50]); decreasing medical intervention seeking (RR: 0.58 with 95% CI [0.37, 0.90]); and decreasing emergency (ER) visits (RR: 0.61 with 95% CI [0.38, 0.97]). However, there was no difference at 300 minutes (RR: 1.10 with 95% CI [0.97, 1.25]). Also, Etripamil was associated with higher rates of the incidence of any adverse events (AEs) (RR: 3.17 with 95% CI [2.15, 4.69]), nasal discomfort (RR: 3.82 with 95% CI [2.01, 7.24]), nasal congestion (RR: 5.89 with 95% CI [1.93, 17.97]), epistaxis (RR: 4.74 with 95% CI [1.21, 18.50]), and rhinorrhea (RR: 3.53 with 95% CI [1.22, 10.26]) with no difference regarding any serious adverse events (SAEs) incidence (RR: 0.30 with 95% CI [0.01, 7.21]). Etripamil was effective in inducing PSVT termination for up to 60 minutes and reduced medical treatment seeking and ER visits. Also, Etripamil was associated with higher rates of AEs, including epistaxis, nasal congestion, and rhinorrhea; however, it was not associated with SAEs. Therefore, Etripamil constitutes a promising strategy for PSVT self-termination without medical supervision; however, further RCTs are required before endorsement in clinical practice.

Review of the Trace Amine-Associated Receptor 1 (TAAR1) Agonist Ulotaront: Part II—Summary of Initial Clinical Efficacy/Safety Results

AbstractIntroductionUlotaront is a trace amine-associated receptor 1 (TAAR1) agonist with serotonin 5-HT1A agonist activity that has received FDA Breakthrough Therapy Designation for the treatment of schizophrenia. Here we summarize ongoing clinical research characterizing the efficacy and safety of ulotaront as a member of the novel trace amine-associated receptor 1 (TAAR1) agonist class.MethodsSummarized are results from a double-blind, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ulotaront (50 mg or 75 mg) in an acute exacerbation of schizophrenia, and a 6-month, open-label follow-up study. Also summarized are post-hoc analyses evaluating negative symptom efficacy, and key safety and adverse event (AE) outcomes.ResultsIn the short-term study, treatment with ulotaront was associated with significant (p&lt;0.001) endpoint improvement in the PANSS total score (effect size [ES]: 0.45), the CGI-Severity score (ES: 0.52) and the Brief Negative Symptom Scale total score (ES: 0.48). The incidence of any AE was lower on ulotaront versus placebo (45.8% vs. 50.4%), and the number needed to harm (NNH) for individual AEs on ulotaront were all &gt;40. Ulotaront was associated with lower risk for antipsychotic class-related AEs (extrapyramidal symptoms, akathisia, somnolence, nausea/vomiting, increased weight/metabolic labs, prolactinemia). The 6-month study demonstrated further improvement, with a completion rate (67%) that was higher than reported for current dopamine D2 antipsychotics.ConclusionsThe emerging profile of ulotaront is characterized by significant improvement in positive and negative symptoms of schizophrenia. The safety and tolerability profile of ulotaront is markedly different with respect to antipsychotic class-related AEs. The benefit-risk profile of ulotaront, as a member of a novel TAAR1 agonist class, is distinguished from antipsychotics by lack of AEs related to D2 and serotonin 5-HT2A receptor blockade.FundingSunovion Pharmaceuticals, Inc., and Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development &amp; Commercialization, Inc.