Incidence Of Advanced Neoplasia Research Articles

Risk of advanced neoplasia after removal of colorectal adenomas with high-grade dysplasia

BackgroundMany studies reported the presence of adenomas with high-grade dysplasia (HGD) at index colonoscopy increased the incidence of advanced neoplasia (AN) and colorectal cancer (CRC) following. However, the conclusion remains obscure due to lack of studies on the specific population of adenomas with HGD. This study aimed to assess the long-term risk of AN and CRC after removal of adenomas with HGD.MethodsA total of 814 patients who underwent adenomas with HGD removal between 2010 and 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. The outcomes were the incidences of AN and CRC during surveillance colonoscopy. Cox proportional hazards models were utilized to identify risk factors associated with AN and CRC.ResultsDuring more than 2000 person-years of follow-up, we found that AN and CRC incidence densities were 44.3 and 4.4 per 1000 person-years, respectively. The 10-year cumulative incidence of AN and CRC were 39.1% and 5.5%, respectively. In the multivariate model, synchronous low-risk polyps (HR 1.80, 95% CI 1.10–2.93) and synchronous high-risk polyps (HR 3.99, 95% CI 2.37–6.72) were risk factors for AN, whereas participation in surveillance colonoscopy visits (HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.36–0.88 for 1 visit; HR 0.10, 95% CI 0.06–0.19 for ≥ 2 visits) were associated with decreased AN incidence. Additionally, elevated baseline carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level (HR 10.19, 95% CI 1.77–58.59) was a risk factor for CRC, while participation in ≥ 2 surveillance colonoscopy visits (HR 0.11, 95% CI 0.02–0.56) were associated with decreased CRC incidence. Interestingly, for 11 patients who developed CRC after removal of adenomas with HGD, immunohistochemistry revealed that 8 cases (73%) were deficient mismatch repair CRCs.ConclusionsPatients who have undergone adenoma with HGD removal are at higher risk of developing AN and CRC, while surveillance colonoscopy can reduce the risk. Patients with synchronous polyps, or with elevated baseline CEA level are considered high-risk populations and require more frequent surveillance.

Low Incidence of Colorectal Advanced Neoplasia During Surveillance in Individuals with a Family History of Colorectal Cancer

BackgroundFamily history of colorectal cancer (CRC) is used to stratify individuals into risk categories which determine timing of initial screening and ongoing CRC surveillance. Evidence for long-term CRC risk following a normal index colonoscopy in family history populations is limited.AimsTo assess the incidence of advanced neoplasia and associated risk factors in a population undergoing surveillance colonoscopies due to family history of CRC.MethodsSurveillance colonoscopy findings were examined in 425 individuals with a family history of CRC, a normal index colonoscopy and a minimum of 10 years of follow-up colonoscopies. Advanced neoplasia risk was determined for three CRC family history categories (near-average, medium and high-risk), accounting for demographics and time after the first colonoscopy.ResultsThe median follow-up was 13.5 years (IQR 11.5–16.0), with an incidence of advanced neoplasia of 14.35% (61/425). The number of affected relatives and age of CRC diagnosis in the youngest relative did not predict the risk of advanced neoplasia (p > 0.05), with no significant differences in advanced neoplasia incidence between the family history categories (p = 0.16). Patients ≥ 60 years showed a fourfold (HR 4.14, 95% CI 1.33–12.89) higher advanced neoplasia risk during surveillance than those < 40 years at index colonoscopy. With each subsequent negative colonoscopy, the risk of advanced neoplasia at ongoing surveillance was reduced.ConclusionsThe incidence of advanced neoplasia was low (14.35%), regardless of the family history risk category, with older age being the main risk for advanced neoplasia. Delaying onset of colonoscopy or lengthening surveillance intervals could be a more efficient use of resources in this population.

FIT for purpose: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial to personalize surveillance colonoscopy for individuals at elevated risk of colorectal cancer

PurposeThere is increasing demand for colorectal cancer (CRC) surveillance, but healthcare capacity is limited. The burden on colonoscopy resources could be reduced by personalizing surveillance frequency using the fecal immunochemical test (FIT). This study will determine the safety, cost-effectiveness, and patient acceptance of using FIT to extend surveillance colonoscopy intervals for individuals at elevated risk of CRC.MethodsThis multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled trial will invite participants who are scheduled for surveillance colonoscopy (due to a personal history of adenomas or a family history of CRC) and who have returned a low fecal hemoglobin (< 2 μg Hb/g feces; F-Hb) using a two-sample FIT (OC Sensor, Eiken Chemical Company) in the prior 3 years. A total of 1344 individuals will be randomized to either surveillance colonoscopy as scheduled or delayed by 1 or 2 years for individuals originally recommended a 3- or 5-year surveillance interval, respectively. The primary endpoint is incidence of advanced neoplasia (advanced adenoma and/or CRC). Secondary endpoints include cost-effectiveness and consumer acceptability of extending surveillance intervals, determined using surveys and discrete choice experiments.ConclusionThis study will establish the safety, cost-effectiveness, and acceptability of utilizing a low FIT Hb result to extend colonoscopy surveillance intervals in a cohort at elevated risk for CRC. This personalized approach to CRC surveillance will lead to a reduction in unnecessary colonoscopies, increases in healthcare savings, and a better patient experience. Trial registrationRegistration was approved on December 9, 2019 with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ANZCTR 12619001743156.

Multiple Negative Fecal Immunochemical Tests Reduce Risk of Advanced Neoplasia in a Colonoscopy Surveillance Program

In above-average-risk individuals undergoing colonoscopy-based surveillance for colorectal cancer (CRC), screening with fecal immunochemical tests (FIT) between colonoscopies might facilitate personalization of surveillance intervals. Because a negative FIT is associated with a reduced risk for CRC, we examined the relationship between number of rounds of negative FIT and risk for advanced neoplasia in individuals undergoing surveillance colonoscopy. We conducted a retrospective cohort study on 4021 surveillance intervals in 3369 individuals (50-74 years), who had completed a 2-sample FIT between colonoscopies, from 1 to 4 rounds at 1-2 yearly intervals, each with a negative result (<20 μg hemoglobin/g feces). Incidence of advanced neoplasia (CRC or advanced adenoma) was determined at the follow-up colonoscopy. Competing-risk regression was used to assess the association between multiple negative FIT results and the risk of advanced neoplasia within 2 years. The incidence of advanced neoplasia in the cohort was 9.9% and decreased with increasing numbers of rounds of negative FIT results: 11.1% after 1 negative FIT to 5.7% after 4 negative FIT. The risk of advanced neoplasia was significantly lower in participants with 3 (subdistribution hazard ratio, 0.50; 95% confidence interval, 0.24-0.97) and 4 (subdistribution hazard ratio, 0.33; 95% confidence interval, 0.15-0.73) rounds of negative FIT compared with only 1 negative FIT. There was a low risk of advanced neoplasia after multiple rounds of negative FIT in above-average-risk people undergoing surveillance with no neoplasia or nonadvanced adenoma at prior colonoscopy. This supports the use of interval FIT to personalize surveillance by lengthening colonoscopy intervals following multiple negative FIT results.

Potential Impact of Extending Surveillance Intervals for Patients With 1-2 Low-Risk Adenomas.

Potential Impact of Extending Surveillance Intervals for Patients With 1-2 Low-Risk Adenomas.

Risk Factors for High-Risk Adenoma on the First Lifetime Colonoscopy Using Decision Tree Method: A Cross-Sectional Study in 6,047 Asymptomatic Koreans.

Background/Aims: As risk of colorectal neoplasm is varied even in persons with “average-risk,” risk evaluation and tailored screening are needed. This study aimed to evaluate the risk factors of high-risk adenoma (HRA) in healthy individuals and determine the characteristics of advanced neoplasia (AN) among individual polyps.Methods: Asymptomatic adults who underwent the first lifetime screening colonoscopy at the Seoul National University Hospital Healthcare System Gangnam Center (SNUH GC) were recruited from 2004 to 2007 as SNUH GC Cohort and were followed for 10 years. Demographic and clinical characteristics were compared between the subjects with and without AN (≥10 mm in size, villous component, and/or high-grade dysplasia and/or cancer) or HRA (AN and/or 3 or more adenomas). For individual polyps, correlations between clinical or endoscopic features and histologic grades were evaluated using a decision tree method.Results: A total of 6,047 subjects were included and 5,621 polyps were found in 2,604 (43%) subjects. Advanced age, male sex, and current smoking status were statistically significant with regards to AN and HRA. A lower incidence of AN was observed in subjects taking aspirin. In the decision tree model, the location, shape, and size of the polyp, and sex of the subject were key predictors of the pathologic type. A weak but significant association was observed between the prediction of the final tree and the histological grouping (Kendall's tau-c = 0.142, p < 0001).Conclusions: Advanced neoplasia and HRA can be predicted using several individual characteristics and decision tree models.

Gastrointestinal Cancer

Background and Aim: Colonoscopic surveillance is undertaken at regular intervals (typically 3 or 5 years) to reduce the incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC) in people with an elevated risk (personal or family history of neoplasia). Pathology findings at index and each surveillance colonoscopy determine recall intervals. Due to coronavirus disease 2019, hospital services around the world have been limited, resulting in some surveillance colonoscopies being delayed beyond the recommended time frames. Previous studies suggest that delays to colonoscopy might increase the incidence of advanced neoplasia (advanced adenoma/CRC). However, it is possible that this risk could be reduced by ensuring that individuals are maintained in a CRC screening program with an immunochemical fecal occult blood test (FIT) in the interval between surveillance colonoscopies. Our aim was to determine whether risk of advanced neoplasia increases if surveillance colonoscopy is delayed in people with elevated CRC risk who perform and have a negative FIT result in the interval between colonoscopies. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study using data from the Southern Cooperative Program for the Prevention of Colorectal Cancer on people at elevated risk because of family history or personal history of adenoma or CRC. People with at least two consecutive colonoscopies of a 3- or 5-year surveillance interval and who had at least one negative interval FIT result were included in the study. They were stratified based on a previous colonoscopy finding of advanced adenoma, non-advanced adenoma, or no neoplasia. People with early colonoscopies (3 months before the recommended due date), poor bowel preparation, previous CRC, or hereditary CRC syndromes were excluded from the study. Colonoscopy was defined as 'delayed' if it did not occur within 6 months after the recommended recall interval and was further subdivided into delays of 6-12, 12-24, and >24 months. The incidence of advanced neoplasia was calculated for all groups. The relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence intervals estimated from a robust multivariable modified Poisson regression were used to assess the association between surveillance colonoscopy delay and risk of advanced neoplasia. Results: A total of 1748 public hospital surveillance colonoscopies (in 1516 participants) were included in the analysis. More than half of the colonoscopies (56.86%, 994/1748) were delayed by at least 6 months because of system and/or patient factors. In people with delayed colonoscopies, the incidence of advanced neoplasia was higher in those with previous advanced adenoma (16.72%, 48/287) and previous non-advanced adenoma (15.23%, 37/243) compared with those with no neoplasia (6.25%, 29/464) (P < 0.001). However, relative to on-time colonoscopy, delay of surveillance colonoscopy was not associated with an increased risk of advanced neoplasia for people who had at least one negative interval FIT result, regardless of previous colonoscopy finding (previous advanced adenoma: RR, 1.01;95% CI, 0.70-1.46;non-advanced adenoma: RR, 1.41;95% CI, 0.85-2.33;and no neoplasia: RR, 0.96;95% CI, 0.55-1.66) (Table 1). Conclusion: In an elevated-risk cohort undergoing FIT screening between surveillance colonoscopies, delays to colonoscopy did not increase risk of advanced neoplasia. These results suggest that surveillance colonoscopy could be safely extended in people at elevated CRC risk by participating in FIT testing between colonoscopies within a surveillance program.

Randomised comparison of postpolypectomy surveillance intervals following a two-round baseline colonoscopy: the Japan Polyp Study Workgroup

ObjectiveTo assess whether follow-up colonoscopy after polypectomy at 3 years only, or at 1 and 3 years would effectively detect advanced neoplasia (AN), including nonpolypoid colorectal neoplasms (NP-CRNs).DesignA prospective multicentre...

Systematic review with meta-analysis: IBD-associated colonic dysplasia prognosis in the videoendoscopic era (1990 to present).

The prognosis of dysplasia in patients with IBD is largely determined from observational studies from the pre-videoendoscopic era (pre-1990s) that does not reflect recent advances in endoscopic imaging and resection. To better understand the risk of synchronous colorectal cancer and metachronous advanced neoplasia (ie high-grade dysplasia or cancer) associated with dysplasia diagnosed in the videoendoscopic era, and to stratify risk according to a lesion's morphology, endoscopic resection status or whether it was incidentally detected on biopsy of macroscopically normal colonic mucosa (ie invisible). A systematic search of original articles published between 1990 and February 2020 was performed. Eligible studies reported on incidence of advanced neoplasia at follow-up colectomy or colonoscopy for IBD-dysplasia patients. Quantitative and qualitative analyses were performed. Thirty-three studies were eligible for qualitative analysis (five for the meta-analysis). Pooled estimated proportions of incidental synchronous cancers found at colectomy performed for a pre-operative diagnosis of visible high-grade dysplasia, invisible high-grade dysplasia, visible low-grade dysplasia and invisible low-grade dysplasia were 13.7% (95% CI 0.0-54.1), 11.4% (95% CI 4.6-20.3), 2.7% (95% CI 0.0-7.1) and 2.4% (95% CI 0.0-8.5) respectively. The lowest incidences of metachronous advanced neoplasia, for dysplasia not managed with immediate colectomy but followed up with surveillance, tended to be reported by the studies where high definition imaging and/or chromoendoscopy was used and endoscopic resection of visible dysplasia was histologically confirmed. The prognosis of IBD-dysplasia diagnosed in the videoendoscopic era appears to have been improved but the quality of evidence remains low. Larger, prospective studies are needed to guide management. PROSPERO registration no: CRD42019105736.

DOP41 Low-grade dysplasia prognosis and predictive factors for advanced neoplasia progression in the 21st century: A large multi-centre retrospective cohort study

Abstract Background Recent advances in ulcerative colitis (UC) endoscopic surveillance such as high-definition imaging and greater chromoendoscopy (CE) use have led to an increase in detection and resection of visible dysplasia. An updated study of prognosis of low-grade dysplasia (LGD) is needed to address uncertainty as to the accuracy of progression rates based on historical studies. Methods This retrospective cohort study involved four UK IBD centres. Hospital and endoscopy pathology databases were searched between 1 January 2001 and 30 December 2018 to identify adult patients with UC who had their first LGD diagnosis diagnosed within the extent of colitis. Only patients followed up with at least one colonoscopy or colectomy by 30 August 2019 were included. The study endpoint was time to high-grade dysplasia (HGD) or cancer (CRC), i.e. advanced neoplasia (AN), or end of follow-up. Survival analyses were performed using Kaplan–Meier estimation and Cox proportional hazards (PH) models. Results In total, 460 patients met the inclusion criteria and were followed up for a median of 4.1 years (IQR 6), equating to 2,232 patient-years. A mean of 3.7 (range 0–17) subsequent colonoscopies was performed per patient. Seventy-seven per cent of patients had CE surveillance. Complete endoscopic resection was achieved in 94% and 64% of the polypoid and non-polypoid LGD, respectively. There was progression to AN in 88 cases (19%) during follow-up. There was no significant difference in AN progression between centres. Unresectable non-polypoid or invisible LGD carried the greatest risk of AN development (Figure 1). On univariate Cox PH analysis, CE use was protective against AN progression (HR 0.5; 95% CI 0.3–1.0; p = 0.04). However, only highly significant predictors of LGD progression to AN on univariate analysis (Bonferroni adjusted p &amp;lt; 0.003), were entered into the multivariate model: Cumulative risk of AN increased with the number of risk factors (Figure 2). Conclusion This is the largest study examining prognosis of LGD, based on endoscopic features, in this century. Five-year cumulative incidence of AN is low after complete endoscopic resection of visible LGD without surrounding dysplasia. Lesion size of 1 cm or more, invisibility, multifocality and unresectability of LGD are significant risk factors for progression to AN. These factors should be taken into consideration when discussing management options with patients.

Panchromoendoscopy Increases Detection of Polyps in Patients With Serrated Polyposis Syndrome

Serrated polyposis syndrome (SPS), characterized by multiple and/or large proximal serrated lesions, increases the risk of colorectal cancer. Serrated lesions often are missed during colonoscopy but panchromoendoscopy can increase their detection in an average-risk population. We performed a randomized controlled study to determine the efficacy of panchromoendoscopy in detection of polyps in patients with SPS. Patients with SPS (n= 86 patients) underwent tandem high-definition (HD) colonoscopies from February 2015 through July 2016 at 7 centers in Spain. Patients were assigned randomly to groups that received 2 HD white-light endoscopy examinations (HD-WLE group; n= 43) or HD-WLE followed by 0.4% indigo carmine panchromoendoscopy (HD-CE group; n= 43). For each procedure, polyps detected were described, removed, and analyzed by histology. The primary outcome was additional polyp detection rate, defined as the number of polyps detected during the second inspection divided by the total number of polyps detected during the first and the second examination. A total of 774 polyps were detected (362 in the HD-WLE group and 412 in the HD-CE group); 54.2% were hyperplastic, 13.8% were adenomas, and 10.9% were sessile serrated polyps. There was a significantly higher additional polyp detection rate in the HD-CE group (0.39; 95% CI, 0.35-0.44) than in the HD-WLE group (0.22; 95% CI, 0.18-0.27) (P < .001). A higher additional rate of serrated lesions proximal to the sigmoid colon were detected in the second inspection with HD-CE (0.40; 95% CI, 0.33-0.47) than with HD-WLE (0.24; 95% CI, 0.19-0.31) (P= .001). Detection of adenomas and serrated lesions greater than 10 mm did not differ significantly between groups. In a multivariate logistic regression analysis, only use of HD-CE was associated independently with increased polyp detection throughout the colon. In a randomized controlled trial, we found that panchromoendoscopy increases detection of polyps (mostly of small serrated lesions) and should be considered the standard of care in patients with SPS. Studies are needed to determine the effects of this strategy on the incidence of advanced neoplasia during long-term follow-up evaluation. ClinicalTrials.gov no: NCT03476434.

Risk of Metachronous Advanced Neoplasia in Patients With Multiple Diminutive Adenomas

Individuals with advanced adenomas or three or more adenomas have a higher risk of metachronous advanced neoplasia (AN) and are recommended to undergo surveillance colonoscopy at shorter intervals. However, it is questionable whether patients with multiple (three or more) non-advanced diminutive adenomas should be considered as high-risk. We analyzed 5482 patients diagnosed with one or more adenomas during their first colonoscopy screening and who underwent a follow-up colonoscopy. Patients were categorized into four groups based on adenoma characteristics at baseline: Group 1, 1-2 non-advanced adenomas; Group 2, ≥3 non-advanced, diminutive (1 to 5 mm) adenomas; Group 3, ≥3 non-advanced, small (6-9 mm) adenomas; and Group 4, advanced adenomas. During a median follow-up of 38 months, the incidence of metachronous AN at surveillance colonoscopy was 5.6%. The incidence of AN was 3.9% in group 1, 5.9% in group 2, 10.6% in group 3, and 22.1% in group 4. The adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) [95% confidence intervals (CIs)] for metachronous AN between group 2, group 3, and group 4, and low risk group 1 were 1.71 (0.99-2.94), 2.76 (1.72-4.44), and 5.23 (3.57-7.68), respectively. Compared with group 4, the adjusted HRs (95% CIs) for group 1, group 2, and group 3 were 0.19 (0.13-0.28), 0.32 (0.18-0.59), and 0.52 (0.31-0.89), respectively. We found that patients with three or more non-advanced diminutive adenomas had a borderline increased risk of metachronous AN compared with patients with low risk adenomas.

Association Between Concentrations of Hemoglobin Determined by Fecal Immunochemical Tests and Long-term Development of Advanced Colorectal Neoplasia

Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening using quantitative fecal immunochemical tests (FITs) is rapidly gaining ground worldwide. FITs are invariably used in a dichotomous manner using pre-specified cut-off values. To optimize FIT-based screening programs, we investigated the association between fecal hemoglobin (fHb) concentrations below the FIT cut-off valueand later development of colorectal advanced neoplasia (AN). We analyzed data collected from a population-based study of 9561 average-risk subjects (50-74 years old) in the Netherlands who were offered 4 rounds of FIT screening for CRC from November 2006 through December 2014. We analyzed data from 7663 participants screened at least once and found to have a negative FIT result at baseline (below the cut-off value of 10 μg Hb/ g feces). Participants were followed for a median of 4.7 years (interquartile range, 2.0-6.1 years); CRCs diagnosed outside thescreening program were identified from the Dutch Comprehensive Cancer Centre database. Hazard ratios for AN were determined using Cox proportional hazard regression analyses. Logistic regression techniques were used to calculate risks of ANafter consecutive fHb concentrations below the cut-off value. After 8 years of follow-up, participants with baseline concentrations of 8-10 μg fHb/g had a higher cumulative incidence of AN (33%) than participants with 0 μg fHb/g (5%) (P< .001). Multi-variate hazard ratios increased from 1.2 for subjects with concentrations of 0-2 μg fHb/g to 8.2 for subjects with concentrations of 8-10 μg fHb/g (P < .001). Participantswith 2 consecutive fHb concentrations of 8 μg Hb/g had a 14-fold increase in risk of AN compared with participantswith 2 consecutive fHb concentrations of 0 μg Hb/g (P < .001). In a population-based study of average-risk individuals with a FIT result below the cut-off value, we associated baseline concentrations of 8-10 μg fHb/g with an increased risk of AN compared with baseline concentrations of 0 μg fHb/g. Baseline and consecutive fHb concentrations are independent predictors for incident AN. This information might be used in designing personalized strategies for population-based CRC screening and reduce unnecessary repeat tests. Trialregister.nl no: first round, NTR1096; second round and additional invitees, NTR1512.

Su1649 Higher Incidence of Advanced Neoplasia in Patients With Left-Sided Colorectal Cancer Resection and Synchronous Advanced Neoplasia: Do We Need to Change the Surveillance Protocol Based on the Resection Type and the Baseline Colonoscopy Findings?

Su1649 Higher Incidence of Advanced Neoplasia in Patients With Left-Sided Colorectal Cancer Resection and Synchronous Advanced Neoplasia: Do We Need to Change the Surveillance Protocol Based on the Resection Type and the Baseline Colonoscopy Findings?

Clinical implications of low grade dysplasia found during inflammatory bowel disease surveillance: a retrospective study comparing chromoendoscopy and white-light endoscopy.

Background and study aims Current guidelines recommend the use of pancolonic chromoendoscopy for surveillance of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). It is currently unknown whether low grade dysplasia (LGD) found using chromoendoscopy carries a similar risk of high grade dysplasia (HGD) or colorectal cancer (CRC) compared with LGD detected using white-light endoscopy (WLE). The aim of this study was to compare the risk of advanced neoplasia, a combined endpoint of HGD and CRC, during follow-up after detection of lesions containing LGD identified with either chromoendoscopy or WLE. Patients and methods A retrospective cohort was established to identify patients who underwent IBD surveillance for ulcerative colitis or colonic Crohn's disease between 2000 and 2014. Subgroups were identified, based on the endoscopic technique (standard definition resolution WLE, high definition resolution WLE or chromoendoscopy). LGD detected in random biopsies was considered invisible LGD. Patients were followed until detection of advanced neoplasia, colectomy, death, or the last known surveillance colonoscopy. Results Of 1065 patients undergoing IBD surveillance, 159 patients underwent follow-up for LGD, which was visible in 133 cases and invisible in 26 cases. On follow-up, five cases of HGD and five cases of CRC were detected. The overall incidence rate of advanced neoplasia was 1.34 per 100 patient-years with a median follow-up of 4.7 years and a median time to advanced neoplasia of 3.3 years. There were no significant differences in the incidence of advanced neoplasia between chromoendoscopy-detected and WLE-detected LGD. Conclusion Advanced neoplasia was found to develop infrequently after detection of LGD in patients undergoing endoscopic surveillance for IBD. LGD lesions detected with either chromoendoscopy or WLE carry similar risks of advanced neoplasia over time.

French comment on article: Incidence of advanced neoplasia during surveillance in high- and intermediate-risk groups of the European colorectal cancer screening guidelines.

French comment on article: Incidence of advanced neoplasia during surveillance in high- and intermediate-risk groups of the European colorectal cancer screening guidelines.

Video Comment on Cubiella et al.

See also: Incidence of advanced neoplasia during surveillance in high- and intermediate-risk groups of the European colorectal cancer screening guidelinesEndoscopy 2016; 48(11): 995-1002DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-112571

Regional colorectal cancer screening program using colonoscopy on an island: a prospective Nii-jima study.

Colorectal cancer screening program using fecal immunochemical test had been conducted on an isolated island named Nii-jima. However, the participation rate of the program had been approximately 12%, which was lower than average level of Japan. This study aimed to evaluate the participation rate, safety and efficacy of a colorectal cancer screening program using colonoscopy on the island. Educational campaigns were actively conducted every month using information bulletins and special propaganda pamphlets. The primary recommended modality was colonoscopy, followed by fecal immunochemical test. The participants of this program were 1671 individuals aged 40–79 years (men, 819; women, 852). A total of 789 (47.2%) individuals provided consent for this screening program, and 89.2% (704/789) of participants chose colonoscopy as the primary screening procedure. The completion rate of total colonoscopy was 99.7%, and there was no complication during this program. Detection rates of invasive cancer, intramucosal cancer, advanced neoplasia and any adenoma were 0.9% (n = 6), 2.4% (n = 17), 11.8% (n = 83) and 50.0% (n = 352), respectively. The adenoma detection rate and incidence of advanced neoplasia were significantly higher in men than in women in all age groups. The colorectal cancer screening program using colonoscopy that was conducted on an island achieved considerably higher participation rate than the conventional screening program using fecal immunochemical test. Completion rate and safety of screening colonoscopy were excellent during this program.

Incidence of advanced neoplasia during surveillance in high- and intermediate-risk groups of the European colorectal cancer screening guidelines.

Background and study aims: The European guidelines for quality assurance in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening have established high-risk (≥ 5 adenomas or an adenoma ≥ 20 mm) and intermediate-risk (3 - 4 adenomas or at least one adenoma 10 - 19 mm in size, or villous histology, or high grade dysplasia) groups with different endoscopic surveillance intervals. The aim of this study was to evaluate the difference in the incidence of advanced neoplasia (advanced adenoma or CRC) between the two risk groups. Patients and methods: This retrospective group study included patients meeting high- or intermediate-risk criteria for adenomas detected in CRC screening programs and the COLONPREV study before European guidelines were adopted in Spain (June 2011) with a 3-year surveillance recommendation according to Spanish guidelines. The primary outcome measure was the incidence of advanced neoplasia in patients undergoing surveillance. The secondary outcome measure was the CRC incidence. We used an adjusted proportional hazards regression model to control confounding variables. Results: The study included 5401 patients (3379 intermediate risk, 2022 high risk). Endoscopic surveillance was performed in 65.5 % of the patients (2.8 ± 1 years). The incidence of advanced neoplasia in the high- and intermediate-risk groups was 16.0 % (59.0 cases/1000 patient-years) and 12.3 % (41.2 cases/1000 patient-years), respectively. The CRC incidence was 0.5 % (1.4 cases/1000 patient-years) and 0.4 % (1 case/1000 patient-years), respectively. The advanced neoplasia and CRC attributable risk to the high risk group was of 3.7 % and 0.1 %, respectively. In the proportional hazards analysis, the risk of advanced neoplasia was greater in the high-risk group (hazard ratio [HR] 1.5, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 1.2 - 1.8), with no significant differences in the CRC incidence (HR 1.6, 95 %CI 0.6 - 3.8). Conclusions: Patients meeting high-risk criteria have a higher incidence of advanced neoplasia during endoscopic surveillance. No differences were found in the CRC incidence at a 3-year surveillance recommendation.

Characteristics of colorectal tumours in asymptomatic patients with negative immunochemical faecal occult blood test results.

The immunochemical faecal occult blood test (iFOBT) is a simple, non-invasive colorectal cancer (CRC) screening method for reducing CRC-related mortality. However, the sensitivity of iFOBT is imperfect and certain colonic neoplasms that require removal may be missed. The aim of this study was to investigate the incidence and characteristics of CRC in asymptomatic, iFOBT-negative patients who underwent opportunistic screening. A total of 919 subclinical patients (276 iFOBT-positive and 643 iFOBT-negative) in the health screening program of our hospital underwent total colonoscopy (TCS) within 2 years after iFOBT. The patients were divided into an iFOBT-positive and an iFOBT-negative group and the TCS findings were compared between the two groups. Although the incidence of advanced neoplasia (CRC, high-grade dysplasia, adenoma sized ≥10 mm and tubulovillous adenoma) was significantly higher in the iFOBT-positive group, these lesions were also found in 6.3% of iFOBT-negative patients. The lesions tended to be proximally located and non-protruding. In conclusion, screening with iFOBT remains clinically significant. However, colonoscopy is indispensable for reducing the incidence and mortality of CRC.