Inappropriate Hospital Days Research Articles

Reduction of hospital length of stay through the implementation of SAFER patient flow bundle and Red2Green days tool: a pre–post study

BackgroundIn 2018, the National Health System released the ‘Guide to reducing long hospital stays’ to stimulate improvement and decrease length of stay (LOS) in England hospitals. The SAFER patient flow...

Prevalence and associated factors of inappropriate hospital admissions and days of children in a secondary hospital in Shanghai, China.

BackgroundAlthough the appropriateness of hospital utilization of adults and the elderly in China was audited by several studies, the appropriateness of hospital use by children in Shanghai remains to be determined. This study aims to assess the level of inappropriate hospital admissions and hospital days, to detect factors associated with inappropriateness, and to elucidate reasons for inappropriateness.MethodsA retrospective review of the records of 291 admissions and 1449 hospital days of children inpatients from a secondary hospital in Shanghai was performed by two reviewers using the Chinese version Pediatric Appropriateness Evaluation Protocol (C-PAEP). Demographics, socio-economic characteristics, and other admission- or hospital stay-related information were collected and analyzed to determine factors associated with inappropriateness utilizing multivariate regression models.Results38.5% (n = 112) of admissions and 9.5% (n = 137) of hospital days were categorized as inappropriate, according to the C-PAEP. Children who were non-Shanghai residents (p < 0.001), admitted through the emergency sector (p = 0.030), and/or received services in a surgical ward (p < 0.001) had a higher risk of being admitted inappropriately. Payment method (p = 0.006), service type (p < 0.001), comorbidity (p = 0.016), length of stay (p = 0.007), and appropriateness of admission (p < 0.001) were found to be associated with prevalence of inappropriate hospital days. Approximately three-fourths of the inappropriate admissions were premature admissions (75.9%, n = 85). The most frequent reasons for inappropriate hospital days were awaiting test results (34.3%, n = 47), awaiting surgery (19.7%, n = 27), awaiting test execution (10.9%, n = 15), and family unprepared for home care (10.9%, n = 15).ConclusionsAlthough the extent of inappropriate hospital days was moderate compared with that found by previous investigations, the prevalence of inappropriateness of admission was considerable. To enhance the appropriateness of hospital care for children, interventions could be implemented according to the associated factors and identified causes.

Predictors and reasons for inappropriate hospitalization days for surgical patients in a tertiary hospital in Wuhan, China: a retrospective study

BackgroundInappropriate hospitalization day (IHD) is recognized as an important indication of the excessive demand for health-care services, especially for surgical patients. We aim to examine the degree of IHDs, predictors associated with higher incidences of IHDs, and reasons for each IHD in different periods of hospitalization.MethodsA total of 4586 hospital days from 408 cases were evaluated by a cross-sectional and retrospective audit program carried out in a tertiary hospital with 5613 beds and 9623 faculty in Wuhan, China. This study used the revised Chinese version of the Appropriateness Evaluation Protocol (C-AEP) to assess IHDs, and the Delay Tool to ascertain each reason for IHDs. A binary logistic regression model was performed to examine the predictors of higher incidences of IHDs.ResultsThe average frequency of IHDs was 23.24 %, and a total of 322 cases (78.92 %) were reported to have experienced at least one IHD. The multivariate analysis showed that patients at the age of 60–69 with respect to under 50, and with overlength of stay were predictors of higher incidences of preoperative IHDs, while admission from outpatient, multiple diagnosis, higher surgical incision level, and overlength of stay were predictors of higher incidence of postoperative IHDs. The most frequent reasons related to health providers for IHDs were doctor’s conservative views of patient management and delays in inspection, prescription, appointment, or result report. Patient factors gave rise to nearly a quarter of postoperative IHDs.Conclusions Findings from this study indicate that measures including paying more attention to the construction of MDT for diagnosis and treatment in general surgery, reducing laboratory turnaround time, dispelling distrust among health-care providers and patients, setting stricter discharge standards and, providing integrated out-of-hospital services could be adopted accordingly to improve the inappropriateness of hospital stays.

Inappropriate hospital stays and association with lack of homecare services.

Efforts to reduce inappropriate hospital stay, including alternatives such as homecare, are important to improve patient care and reduce health care costs. This study evaluated inappropriate hospital stay in Shiraz, Islamic Republic of Iran and the extent to which these stays were due to lack of homecare services and others factors needed for homecare. This cross-sectional study was conducted between January 2018 and September 2019 at two public hospitals in Shiraz. All adult patients hospitalized in these two hospitals in the study period were included, except patients in mental care wards. Appropriateness of patients' hospital stay was assessed on a daily basis using the Iranian version of the Appropriateness Evaluation Protocol. The chi-squared test was used to assess association between need for homecare and patient characteristics. Of 6458 hospitalization days assessed (for 1954 patients), 710 (11.0%) days were inappropriate. The greatest proportion of causes of inappropriate stay were physician-related (32.9%). Of the 710 inappropriate hospitalization days, 231 were due to lack of homecare services. Most patients who were inappropriately hospitalized because of lack of homecare services were insured through Salamat insurance (64.0%). A statistically significant relationship was found between the need for homecare services and the type of health insurance (P = 0.01). Of the patients admitted to hospital because of lack of homecare services, 36.8% had endocrine diseases, especially diabetes, and 21.8% needed oxygen services. Institutionalizing home health care in the Iranian health system could encourage more home health care referral and reduce inappropriate hospitalization, especially for diabetes.

Evaluation of Inappropriate Admission and Hospitalization According to Appropriateness Evaluation Protocol and Estimation of Direct Financial Burden

Background: Appropriate allocation of resources is an important issue in the delivery of services that can reduce the health system costs. The inappropriateness of healthcare services is one of the problems that increase the pressure on hospitals and patients. Methods: In this study, the data were collected using the appropriateness evaluation protocol by a medicine specialist at Rasoul Akram Hospital. In total, 248 participants were selected through systematic sampling. To calculate the financial burden simultaneously with the evaluation of inappropriate hospitalization days, the medicine and facility costs along with the cost of bed-day were estimated. Data were analyzed by SPSS software. Results: The type of treatment was surgery in 56.8% of the patients and 43.2% of them were admitted to the hospital for internal medicine. The mean length of stay was 4 ± 6 days. The inappropriate admission rate was estimated at about 6% and the rate of inappropriate hospital stays was 21.5%. The most important factors influencing the inappropriateness of hospitalization were delayed medical consultations, delayed surgery, conservative practitioner, and the follow-up of clinical test results. The sum of the direct financial burden of inappropriate hospitalization for the patients was estimated at around 1060 dollars. Conclusions: The findings of this study indicated that inappropriate hospitalization and admission imposed a huge financial burden on the health system and community. Hospital authorities by considering issues such as delayed medical consultations and delayed surgery can decrease the financial burden of inappropriate hospitalization to a large extent.

Inappropriate hospital days of a tertiary hospital in Shanghai, China

This study aims to evaluate the prevalence of inappropriate hospital stays in a tertiary hospital in Shanghai, identify the causes for the inappropriateness and analyze the predictors. A retrospective review of medical records. The cardiology and the orthopedics departments of a tertiary hospital in Shanghai, China. About 806 patients discharged from the cardiology or the orthopedics department of a tertiary hospital from March 2013 to February 2014. Two reviewers audited 8396 hospital days of the cardiology department (n = 3606) and the orthopedics department (n = 4790) by adopting the Chinese Version of the Appropriateness Evaluation Protocol. Univariate and multivariate analysis were adopted to identify the predictors of higher levels of inappropriateness produced by internal causes. The prevalence of inappropriate hospital days. It was found that 910 (25.2%) and 1940 (40.5%) hospital days were judged to be inappropriate in the cardiology and the orthopedics departments, respectively; and 753 (20.9%) and 1585 (33.1%) of these inappropriate hospital days were due to internal reasons, respectively. Awaiting tests, surgery or discharge were determined to constitute the main causes of inappropriateness for both departments. The predictors of higher levels of inappropriateness in the cardiology department were younger age, self-pay, outpatient admission and inappropriate admission. Self-pay, surgical and/or first-time admission patients exhibited the highest levels of inappropriateness in the orthopedics department. The rates of inappropriateness in the involved departments were relatively high. Further interventions should be designed and implemented, accordingly.

Evaluation study on the appropriateness of hospitalization days at a tertiary hospital

Objective To evaluate the appropriateness of hospitalization days at a tertiary hospital in 2014 by means of the Appropriateness Evaluation Protocol (AEP), and to analyze the causes of inappropriate stays. Methods Medical records of inpatients admitted at a tertiary hospital in 2014 were randomly selected. AEP(US version) was used to evaluate the appropriateness of every hospitalization day, while the causes of inappropriate hospitalization day were also analyzed. Results A total of 1 641 days of stay from 148 medical records were reviewed, and 129 days of stay (7.9%) were seen as inappropriate. Two major factors for inappropriate stays were waiting for surgery and waiting for test, roughly 89.1% of the inappropriate hospitalization days. The proportion of inappropriate hospital stays reduced to 4.8% after adjustment of two-day weekend. Inappropriate hospital stays mostly appeared during the second day to the eighth day after admission(93.8%). Logistic analysis results showed that with concomitant symptoms, preoperative waiting days >5 days, high level surgery, non-emergency admission were significantly associated with appropriateness of hospital stays (P<0.05). Conclusions The rate of inappropriate stays will be reduced and the quality of medical services will be improved if comprehensive measures could be carried out according to the causes of inappropriate stays. Key words: Hospitalization days; Appropriateness evaluation protocol; Medical records; Logistic regression

Evaluation of Appropriateness Admission and Hospital Stay at Educational Hospital.

Appropriate admissions and patients' length of stay are two of the most important indicators of efficient health care delivery in hospitals. Paying due attention to these indicators may lead to optimal use of hospital resources as well as provision of ambulatory services to a larger population of patients. The purpose of the current study is to quantify the rate of inappropriate hospital admissions and days of hospital stay to identify factors affecting them. Data were collected regarding admissions and length of stay of 1815 patients admitted to an educational hospital in Tehran, Iran, with a total 12,629 days of hospitalization using the Appropriateness Evaluation Protocol. A qualitative study was conducted using content analysis method by analyzing data from interviews with the hospital personnel about the factors affecting patients' length of stay. The results indicated that the average length of stay in medical and surgical wards was 9.4 to 6.3 days, and 8.5% of admissions and 3.4% of stays were inappropriate. The necessity to receive nursing care and/or to receive medical services and/or the patients' conditions accounted for 57.6% of total hospitalization days, followed by the need to receive nursing care alone (36.6%). Planning/Procedures/ Personnel factors were responsible for 77.3% of inappropriate stays. The qualitative study revealed that in addition to sound in house policy setting, abundance of suitable equipment and facilities at the hospital site had positively affected the appropriateness of hospital stay while incoordination of health care delivery groups, rotation of residents and other wards personnel and lack of a proper complementary patient follow-up system, had a negative impact on the same indicator. Inappropriate admissions and inappropriate stays are influenced by numerous factors, both inside and outside of the hospitals; the results of the current study indicate that structural factors such as techniques adopted in the studied hospital, contributed significantly to decreasing inappropriate stays. Improving and upgrading these techniques will make optimal use of hospital beds possible.

A comparison study between two discharge planning tools

ObjectiveThe objective was to compare the effectiveness between a systematic assessment tool and a traditional assessment tool for discharge planning. MethodsThis research adopted a two-group comparison study design, and convenience sampling was adopted to recruit patients requiring discharge-planning services at eight wards in a regional teaching hospital in Southern Taiwan. The postdischarge care requirements of two groups of patients were evaluated using a traditional assessment tool and a systematic assessment tool in different implementation periods, respectively. Sixty-eight patients were matched with similar age and with similar activity in daily living index scores to compare the effectiveness of the tools. ResultsThe systematic assessment tool exhibited higher assessment integrity and placement appropriateness, as well as lower rates of rehospitalization or mortality within discharge 14 days. The two groups exhibited no significant difference in inappropriate hospital days, primary decision-makers' satisfaction, and proportion of referral professionals who meet patient care requirements. However, the differences in three items of satisfaction exhibited moderate-to-large effect sizes, which may be of clinical importance. ConclusionsTo meet the needs of primary decision-makers in a family, enhance their satisfaction, and provide effective discharge-planning services, clinicians should adopt the systematic assessment tool to assess the postdischarge care requirements of a patient, and the hospital should provide relevant facilities to assist in implementing all plans.

Developing of the appropriateness evaluation protocol for public hospitals in iran.

Background:Employment of utilization review instruments is a method for managing costs and efficiency in the healthcare systems.Objectives:This study developed an instrument for measuring the level of inappropriate acute hospital admissions and days of care in Iran.Patients and Methods:The American version of the Appropriateness Evaluation Protocol (AEP) was modified, using the agreement method, by a multidisciplinary group of physicians. We conducted a retrospective descriptive study of 273 randomly selected patients admitted to Imam Khomeini Hospital of Tehran University of Medical Sciences in Tehran, Iran. For the reliability study, two nurses were asked to review patients’ medical records using the instrument. Validity was appraised by pairs of clinicians, including two general surgeons, two internists and two gynecologists. The degree of consensus between the three pairs of clinicians was compared with that of the nurses.Results:Inter-rater and intra-rater reliability testing revealed an excellent level of consensus between the two nurses employing the AEP in all the studied departments. Overall agreement was > 92%, while the specific appropriate agreement and specific inappropriate agreement were > 88% and > 83%, respectively. External validity testing of the instrument yielded a sensitivity > 0.785, specificity > 0.55, and positive and negative predictive values > 0.775 and > 0.555, respectively. The kappa statistic for the nurses who applied the AEP and clinicians using personal judgment were perfect (k > 0.85) and substantial (k > 0.68), respectively.Conclusions:The results illustrate that the Iranian version of the AEP (IR-AEP) could be a reliable and valid instrument for assessing the level of inappropriate acute hospital admissions and days of care in the Iranian context.

A multicenter study on the appropriateness of hospitalization in obstetric wards: application of Obstetric Appropriateness Evaluation Protocol (Obstetric AEP)

The cross-sectional study has been based on the implementation of the Obstetric Appropriateness Evaluation Protocol (OAEP) in seven hospitals to determine inappropriate hospital admissions and days of stay. The outcomes were: inappropriateness of admission and “percentage of inappropriateness” for one hospitalization. A total number of 2196 clinical records were reviewed. The mean percentage of inappropriateness for hospitalization was 22%. The percentage of inappropriateness for the first 10 d of hospitalization peaked in correspondence of the fourth (42%). The logistic regression model on inappropriated admission reported that emergency admission was a protective factor (OR = 0.4) and to be hospitalized in wards with ≥30 beds risk factor (OR = 5.12). The second linear model on “percentage of inappropriateness” showed that inappropriated admission and wards with ≥30 beds increased the percentage (p < 0.001); whereas the admission in Teaching Hospitals was inversely associated (p < 0.001). The present study suggests that the percentage of inappropriate admission depends especially on the inappropriate admission and the large number of beds in obstetric wards. This probably indicates that management of big hospitals, which is very complex, needs improving the processes of support and coordination of health professionals. The OAEP tool seems to be an useful instrument for the decision-makers to monitor and manage the obstetric wards.

Causes of inappropriate hospital days: development and validation of a French assessment tool for rehabilitation centres

To develop and validate a list of criteria to assess the causes of inappropriate hospital days for patients admitted to rehabilitation centres and sub-acute care units. The tool was developed by a multidisciplinary panel of 33 experts, using a formalized consensus method. It collects both the needs of patients (distinguishing healthcare needs (9 criteria) and accommodation needs (9 criteria)) and the reasons for inappropriateness (19 criteria). Inappropriate days were identified using the tool to assess appropriateness of hospital days validated previously. Reliability was studied by measuring agreement between two independent simultaneous ratings. The validation study was performed on a randomized sample of 576 hospital days from 22 wards in France. Inter-rater reliability was evaluated using the κ-statistic and prevalence-adjusted and bias-adjusted kappa (PABAK). For patient accommodation needs, the inter-rater reliability was estimated by a κ-value of 0.80 (95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.66-0.92) and a PABAK of 0.80 (95% CI 0.63-0.91). There was good agreement on the reasons for inappropriateness, with κ-values from 0.30 to 0.60 and PABAK from 0.46 to 0.69. The κ-coefficient varied from 0.33 to 0.49 for the assessment of patient healthcare needs, with PABAK ranging from 0.49 to 0.72. The instrument is suitable and valid to assess the causes of inappropriate hospital days in rehabilitation centres and sub-acute care units. The study showed that the tool can be easily used by healthcare workers, which makes it useful for quality improvement.

Length of stay as risk factor for inappropriate hospital days: interaction with patient age and co‐morbidity

The likelihood of a hospital day being inappropriate depends on patient characteristics, on the organization of in-hospital care and on the co-ordination between hospital care and the rest of the health care sector. The aim of the study was to assess if certain socio-demographic and medical factors affect inappropriate hospital stay including possible interactions between age and co-morbidity. To determine the appropriateness of length of hospitalization, a prospective study was carried out using the European version of the Appropriateness Evaluation Protocol (AEP). A total of 438 hospital days of stay was analysed in medical wards of a university-affiliated teaching hospital in the North of Italy for 3 days in September 2010. 44.6% of hospitalization days were classified as inappropriate. Unjustified hospital use was more frequent in patients whose hospital length of stay exceeded 10 days. Age and co-morbidity were not per se risk factors for inappropriateness; however, in young patients hospitalized for more than 10 days, absence of chronic illness was a predictor. Conservative patient management, lack of discharge planning and delays in scheduling diagnostic tests or therapeutic interventions were the most common causal or contributory doctor- and hospital-related factors. Doctor attitudes and hospital organization are still among the most common reasons for inappropriate in-hospital days of care. Monitoring whether the length of stay is appropriate combined with protocol interventions for scheduling of diagnosis, treatment and discharge are likely to improve efficiency in this area of medical care.

Inappropriate hospitalization days in Korean Oriental Medicine hospitals

To examine the extent of inappropriate hospitalization days in Korean oriental medicine (OM) hospitals and to determine the factors associated with inappropriate stays. Cross-sectional study design using concurrent and retrospective medical record reviews. Two teaching OM hospitals in Korea. Patients (n = 256) consecutively discharged from general care units in two OM hospitals in 1 month. The appropriateness of each hospitalization day was assessed using a modified appropriateness evaluation protocol. Patient and healthcare use characteristics were also reviewed. Multiple regression analyses were performed to determine factors associated with inappropriate stay. Rate of inappropriate hospitalization days. Overall, 14.9% (691/4644) of hospitalization days reviewed were judged inappropriate with a mean of 18.3% (95% confidence interval = 14.6-22.0) per patient. Approximately half of patients (n = 126, 49.2%) had at least 1 inappropriate hospitalization day. Factors associated with inappropriate hospitalization days were admission method and number of types of OM therapies. Patients admitted to hospitals on foot without assistance had more inappropriate hospitalization days than those admitted by stretcher cart. Those who underwent several types of OM therapies during hospitalization had fewer inappropriate hospitalization days. A substantial proportion of hospitalization days were evaluated as inappropriate. Patient condition at admission and types of OM therapies required should be taken into account to reduce unnecessary stays in OM hospitals. Additionally, availability of OM services, especially for patients with limited motor functions, needs to be improved outside hospitals.

A case-control study about multi-disciplinary management for aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage treated with clipping surgery

Objective To explore the effect of multi-disciplinary management for aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage treated with clipping surgery. Methods 123 subjects admitted to hospital in April 2005 to March 2007 and received traditional management were named as the control group.62 subjects in the control group who admitted to neurology department first and then transferred to neurosurgery when diagnosed as aSAH by DSA were named as the transfer group. 61 subjects who admitted to neurosurgery directly and diagnosed as aSAH by DSA were named as the surgery group. 101 subjects who received multidisciplinary management from April 2007 to March 2009 were named as the experimental group. The waiting time before DSA, waiting time before surgery, hospital and hospitalization costs were compared between the three groups. Results Compared with the transfer group and the surgery group, the experimental group was lower in waiting time before DSA, waiting time before surgery, hospital and hospitalization costs, but there is no significant difference between the three groups in postoperative neurological function score and incidence rate of complications. The mortality rate was not significantly higher in the experimental group than the transfer group, but was significantly lower than the surgery group. Conclusions Multi-disciplinary management can reduce the inappropriate hospital stay of aSAH patients for early surgery. It can reduce the average hospital stay, hospital cost, in order to reduce the burden on families and society. Key words: Aneurysm; Subarachnoid hemorrhage; Multi- disciplinary cooperation; Process management; Inappropriate hospitalization days

Revue de pertinence des journées d’hospitalisation en médecine et chirurgie : un tiers de journées inappropriées au CHU de Nantes

To assess the rate of inappropriate hospital days at Nantes University Hospital, to compare Internal Medicine and General Medicine departments to other hospital departments and to describe the main reasons for inappropriateness. A cross-sectional study was conducted during spring 2006, on a given day that differed in the 11 participating medical and surgical departments. All inpatients in the departments were included, except those admitted or discharged that day. The French version of the Appropriateness Evaluation Protocol was used to assess each day. Overall 32.4% of hospital days (71/219) (95% confidence interval: 26.1-38.7) were inappropriate. This rate did not vary significantly between internal and general medical, specialty, and surgical departments, although their inpatients had different characteristics. The risk factors for inappropriateness included long stays, unplanned admissions, behavioral disorders, and older age. Only a long stay was identified as a risk factor in all departments. Most of these inappropriate days (77.5%) were due to external causes (patients awaiting transfer). The decision of the patient (or family) was involved in 12.7%, and internal organizational reasons in 9.8%. This study showed a variety of risk factors for inappropriate days, differing according to department (except long stays, which were a risk factor in all departments). This confirms that patient characteristics play a major role, more significant than the department itself. Our analysis of the causes of these inappropriate hospital days, like those of most other studies, finds that only a few of these causes are susceptible to internal improvements. To optimize patient transfers, however, several units have begun training to make hospital staff aware of the importance of early planning. The impact of these measures on the number of inappropriate days should be assessed in the future.

A predictive score to identify hospitalized patients' risk of discharge to a post-acute care facility

BackgroundEarly identification of patients who need post-acute care (PAC) may improve discharge planning. The purposes of the study were to develop and validate a score predicting discharge to a post-acute care (PAC) facility and to determine its best assessment time.MethodsWe conducted a prospective study including 349 (derivation cohort) and 161 (validation cohort) consecutive patients in a general internal medicine service of a teaching hospital. We developed logistic regression models predicting discharge to a PAC facility, based on patient variables measured on admission (day 1) and on day 3. The value of each model was assessed by its area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC). A simple numerical score was derived from the best model, and was validated in a separate cohort.ResultsPrediction of discharge to a PAC facility was as accurate on day 1 (AUC: 0.81) as on day 3 (AUC: 0.82). The day-3 model was more parsimonious, with 5 variables: patient's partner inability to provide home help (4 pts); inability to self-manage drug regimen (4 pts); number of active medical problems on admission (1 pt per problem); dependency in bathing (4 pts) and in transfers from bed to chair (4 pts) on day 3. A score ≥ 8 points predicted discharge to a PAC facility with a sensitivity of 87% and a specificity of 63%, and was significantly associated with inappropriate hospital days due to discharge delays. Internal and external validations confirmed these results.ConclusionA simple score computed on the 3rd hospital day predicted discharge to a PAC facility with good accuracy. A score > 8 points should prompt early discharge planning.

Reducing Inappropriate Hospital Use on a General Pediatric Inpatient Unit

Studies have documented high rates of inappropriate hospital use in children. We assessed the effectiveness of an audit-and-feedback intervention at reducing inappropriate hospital days on a general pediatric inpatient unit. A prospective observational study, using a before-and-after design, was conducted at a tertiary care pediatric hospital in Canada between March 2005 and August 2006. The appropriateness of all hospital days for all admissions was evaluated by a nurse trained in using a utilization review tool. This tool classifies hospital days as "qualified" or "nonqualified" on the basis of the nature of the inpatient services that are used. Reasons for nonqualified days were classified. The intervention consisted of (1) weekly feedback to attending physicians of which patients were nonqualified and (2) dissemination of summary reports to attending physicians. Comparisons were made between the preintervention (March 2005 to August 2005) and intervention (March 2006 to August 2006) phases. The intervention was associated with a significantly lower risk of inappropriate hospital days. Of the 7246 hospital days in the 6-month intervention phase, 2413 (33%) were nonqualified versus 3859 (47%) of 8228 hospital days in the 6-month preintervention phase. A total of 7.35 hospital days would have to be reviewed, combined with weekly feedback, to prevent 1 nonqualified hospital day. The 48-hour readmission rate in the intervention phase and preintervention phase was 1.0% and 1.6%, respectively. The proportion of nonqualified days to total hospital days that were attributable to "finishing intravenous antibiotics," "awaiting tests," "providing nutrition," "observation only," "tapering treatment," and "teaching" decreased significantly, whereas the "lack of an alternate level of care" increased significantly. An audit-and-feedback intervention directed at attending physicians was associated with a lower risk of inappropriate hospital days without an increase in the readmission rate. The utilization review tool also identified processes that impact on inappropriate hospital days.

Characteristics of patient and healthcare service utilization associated with inappropriate hospitalization days

This paper is a report of a study to examine the number of inappropriate days of hospitalization and to identify the characteristics of patient and healthcare service utilization associated with inappropriate hospital stays. Inappropriate hospitalization stays are recognized as an important indication of the misuse of healthcare services, but the published literature shows inconsistent findings on factors influencing this. A descriptive, correlational study was carried out in September 2005, with a patient survey and a review of patient records. Data were collected for 383 patients discharged from eight general nursing care units in a tertiary teaching hospital in Korea. Inappropriate hospitalization days were defined as inpatient days not requiring continuous and active medical, nursing or paramedical treatment provided by hospital services, and were judged using the Korean version of the Appropriate Evaluation Protocol. Univariate and multiple regression analyses were performed to determine factors associated with inappropriate hospitalization days. A total of 3076 hospitalization days were reviewed. The average proportion that were inappropriate was 5.1% (+/-16.0) per patient, and 14.1% of patients were determined to have had at least one inappropriate hospitalization day. The most common reason judged as appropriate was need for nursing/life support services. Statistically significant factors associated with inappropriate stay included gender, age, primary disease, length of stay and ward bed occupancy level during the patient's hospitalization. Managers should take into account patient and clinical characteristics to promote better utilization of hospital resources.

An assessment of inappropriate hospital bed utilization by elderly patients in southern Italy

The aims of this study were to quantify the rate of inappropriate hospital admissions and days of stay among elderly patients, and to identify the main causes of such inappropriateness. A random sample of 560 medical records of patients aged 65 and over, admitted to medical and surgical wards of a non-teaching hospital in Catanzaro (Italy) were reviewed (occupation rate: 81.9%, average length of stay: 5.6 days; hospitalization rate in the area: 130.8 per 1,000 inhabitants). Of the 529 patient days reviewed, 9.8% of hospital admissions were judged to be inappropriate, and the level of inappropriate hospital days of stay was 39.5%. The inappropriateness of admission was significantly higher for younger patients and for those whose admission was programmed. Demographic and hospital variables were significant predictors of the risk of inappropriateness per day of care: women, those not living alone, patients admitted with a more severe burden of overall comorbidity, patients inappropriately admitted, and those sampled close to discharge were more likely to be classified as inappropriate. Inappropriate admission was due to premature admission, an overcautious physician's attitude in the management of a patient, and admission for a diagnostic or therapeutic procedure that should have been performed on an out-patient basis. The reasons for inappropriate hospital stay were: physician's lack of decision regarding discharge of a patient and delays in scheduling a diagnostic or therapeutic procedure. Interventions are needed in order to increase the quality and efficiency of hospital care, by rectifying the attitudes and behaviors of Italian physicians.