Inappropriate Antibiotic Choice Research Articles

Patterns and Quality of Antibiotic Prescribing: Results from a Multicentre Point Prevalence Survey in Government Hospitals in Perak, Malaysia

A point prevalence survey (PPS) is used to collect data on antimicrobial prescribing and assess a set of quality indicators associated with antimicrobial use. This study aimed to describe patterns and quality indicators of antibiotic prescribing among government hospitals in Perak, Malaysia. Data was retrospectively reviewed data from a PPS conducted from 1st to 14th December 2021 in 5 specialist and 10 non-specialist hospitals. All hospitalised patients on the day of the survey formed the study population. Those who had received at least one active systemic antibiotic by 8.00 a.m. or surgical prophylaxis within 24 h of the survey day were eligible for PPS. Data on pattern and quality indicators of prescribing (documentation of indication, guideline compliance and appropriateness of surgical prophylaxis) were analysed with descriptive evaluation. Of 2,386 hospitalised patients, 40% were prescribed antibiotics, mainly from the ‘Access’ category (52.3%). Antibiotic prevalence was highest in the intensive care unit (ICU) (90.8%). The predominant antibiotic class was beta-lactam/ beta-lactamase inhibitor (32.6%), corresponding to community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) (19.8%) being the most common diagnosis. Intravenous administration was ordered in 79.4%, while empirical therapy constituted 84.5%. Documentation of indication within 24 h and guideline compliance were 88.2% and 69.8%, respectively. Inappropriate choice of antibiotics and improper dose/frequency were identified as important non-compliance issues. Of the surgical prophylaxis prescriptions, 35.6% were administered for more than 24 h. The findings have helped identify critical areas for antimicrobial stewardship interventions. Efforts are needed to reinforce compliance, documentation and improve surgical prophylaxis prescribing practices.

Practices and motives behind antibiotics provision in drug outlets in Tanzania: A qualitative study.

Dispensing antibiotics without prescription is among the major factors leading to antimicrobial resistance. Dispensing of antibiotics without prescription has negative impact at the individual and societal level leading to poor patient outcomes, and increased risks of resistant bacteria facilitated by inappropriate choice of antibiotics doses/courses. Antimicrobial resistance is a global public health threat which is projected to cause 10 million deaths by 2050 if no significant actions are taken to address this problem This study explored the practices and motives behind dispensing of antibiotics without prescription among community drug outlets in Tanzania. Finding of this study provides more strategies to antibiotics stewardship intervention. In-depth interviews with 28 drug dispensers were conducted for three months consecutively between November 2019 and January 2020 in 12 community pharmacies and 16 Accredited Drug Dispensing Outlets (ADDOs) in the Mwanza, Kilimanjaro and Mbeya regions of Tanzania. Transcripts were coded and analyzed thematically using NVivo12 software. Majority of dispensers admitted to providing antibiotics without prescriptions, selling incomplete courses of antibiotics and not giving detailed instructions to customers on how to use the drugs. These practices were motivated by several factors including customers' pressure/customers' demands, business orientation-financial gain of drug dispensers, and low purchasing power of patients/customers. It is important to address the motives behind the unauthorized dispensing antibiotics. On top of the existing regulation and enforcement, we recommend the government to empower customers with education and purchasing power of drugs which can enhance the dispensers adherence to the dispensing regulations. Furthermore, we recommend ethnographic research to inform antibiotic stewardship interventions going beyond awareness raising, education and advocacy campaigns. This will address structural drivers of AMR such as poverty and inadequate government health services, and the disconnect between public messaging and/or policy and the public itself.

Validation of an electronic algorithm to identify appropriate antibiotic use for community-acquired pneumonia in children

Background: Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is a common indication for antibiotic use in hospitalized children and is a key target for pediatric antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs). Building upon prior work, we developed and refined an electronic algorithm to identify children hospitalized with CAP and to evaluate the appropriateness of initial antibiotic choice and duration. Methods: We performed a cross-sectional study including children 6 months to 17 years hospitalized for CAP between January 1, 2019, and October 31, 2022, at a tertiary-care children’s hospital. CAP was defined electronically as an International Classification of Disease, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) code for pneumonia, a chest radiograph or chest computed tomography scan (CT) performed within 48 hours of admission, and systemic antibiotics administered within the first 48 hours of hospitalization and continued for at least 2 days. We applied the following exclusion criteria: patients transferred from another healthcare setting, those who died within 48 hours of hospitalization, children with complex chronic conditions, and those with intensive care unit stays >48 hours. Criteria for appropriate antibiotic choice and duration were defined based on established guidelines. Two physicians performed independent medical record reviews of 80 randomly selected patients (10% sample) to evaluate the performance of the electronic algorithm in (1) identifying patients treated for clinician-diagnosed CAP and (2) classifying antibiotic choice and duration as appropriate. A third physician resolved discrepancies. The electronic algorithm was compared to this medical record review, which served as the reference standard. Results: Of 80 children identified by the electronic algorithm, 79 (99%) were diagnosed with CAP based on medical record review. Antibiotic use was classified as the appropriate choice in 75 (94%) of 80 cases, and appropriate duration in 16 (20%) of 80 cases. The sensitivity of the electronic algorithm for identifying appropriate initial antibiotic choice was 94%; specificity could not be calculated because no events of inappropriate antibiotic choice were identified based on chart review. The sensitivity and specificity for determining appropriate duration were 88% and 97%, respectively (Table 1).Conclusions: The electronic algorithm accurately identified children hospitalized with CAP and demonstrated acceptable performance for identifying appropriate antibiotic choice and duration. Use of this electronic algorithm may improve the efficiency of stewardship activities and could facilitate alignment with updated accreditation standards. Future studies validating this algorithm at other centers are needed.Disclosures: None

Assessment of antibiotic appropriateness at discharge: experience from a quaternary care hospital setting.

BackgroundThere is a gap in antimicrobial stewardship in transitions of care.ObjectivesTo assess the appropriateness of antibiotics utilized and prescribing habits at hospital discharge.MethodsA retrospective, observational study was conducted at our quaternary care hospital between January 2021 and March 2021. During the study period, all patients discharged on antibiotics for pneumonia (PNA), skin and soft tissue infections (SSTI), urinary tract infections (UTI) and intra-abdominal infections (IAI) were included. The overall appropriateness of therapy was assessed based on the following combined criteria: agent, dose, frequency, duration of therapy, and ability to meet diagnostic criteria.ResultsOne hundred and forty-five subjects met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 44 (30.3%) were determined to have received overall appropriate antibiotic therapy. The most common infections were UTI, followed by IAI, PNA, and SSTI, respectively. Further, from the group deemed to have received overall inappropriate therapy, 26 of the 101 (25.7%) patients received an inappropriate antibiotic choice, 6 (5.9%) an inappropriate dose, and 84 (83.2%) an inappropriate duration of therapy.ConclusionsInappropriate duration of therapy represented the most challenging problem with antibiotic regimens at discharge. Larger studies are needed to identify potential interventions that are effective, and can be implemented in all settings, including resource-limited ones.

Evaluation of antibiotic appropriateness at an outpatient oncology centre.

Current evidence supporting antimicrobial stewardship programs focused largely in inpatient setting. With the shift in cancer management from inpatient to ambulatory setting, it is crucial to examine the prevalence and predictors of inappropriate antibiotics prescribing. This is a retrospective cross-sectional study conducted at the National Cancer Centre Singapore (NCCS). Patients at least 21 years, with an active or past cancer diagnosis and prescribed with at least one oral antibiotic by a NCCS physician from 1st July to 30th September 2019 were included. Antibiotic appropriateness was assessed using institutional antibiotic guidelines or published clinical practice guidelines. For cases where antibiotics appropriateness cannot be ascertained using these guidelines, an independent three-member expert panel was consulted. A total of 815 patients were screened; 411 (59.4% females) were included with mean age of 62.4 years. The top three cancer diagnoses were breast (26.5%), lung (15.6%) and head and neck (13.6%). More than half (58.6%) received appropriate antibiotic choice. Of which, 235 (97.5%), 238 (98.8%) and 194 (80.5%) received appropriate dose, frequency and duration respectively. The presence of non-oncologic immunosuppressive comorbidities (OR 4.890, 95% CI 1.556-15.369, p-value = 0.007), antibiotic allergy (OR 2.352, 95% CI 1.178-4.698, p-value = 0.015) and skin and soft tissue infections (OR 2.004, 95% CI 1.276-3.146, p-value = 0.003) were associated with a higher incidence of inappropriate antibiotic choice. This study highlighted that inappropriate antibiotic prescribing is prevalent in the ambulatory oncology setting. Predicators identified can aid in the design of targeted strategies to optimise antibiotic use in ambulatory oncology patients.

Rational use of antibiotics and covariates of clinical outcomes in patients admitted to intensive care units of a tertiary hospital in Kenya

Objectives : Rational use of antibiotics implies appropriate choice of an antibiotic administered at correct dose, frequency and duration using the most suitable route of administration. Irrational antibiotics use is associated with antimicrobial resistance, drug failure and high mortality in the critical care units (CCUs). This study sought to establish rational use of antibiotics and determinants of clinical outcomes of patients admitted in the CCUs at the Kenyatta National Hospital (KNH). The findings would guide policy formulation of antibiotics use in hospital CCUs in Kenya and the region. Methods : Retrospective review of 220 admissions to the KNH CCUs over the period February 2018–February 2020 was conducted. Participants’ sociodemographics, clinical characteristics, antibiotics therapy, and outcome of admission were extracted from patient files and analyzed using STATA version 23. Determinants of irrational antibiotic use and covariates of clinical outcomes were computed at 95% confidence. Results The prevalence of rational use of antibiotics was only 18.5%. Inappropriate choice of antibiotics (51.0%) and incorrect duration (32.3%) were the most common irrational practices. Flucloxacillin (100%), cefuroxime (93.3%), cefazolin (85.7%) and ceftriaxone (83.0%) were the most irrationally used antibiotics. Irrational use of ceftriaxone was significantly associated with clinical diagnosis (p=0.012) while that of amoxiclav was associated with patient risk category (p=0.039). Mortality in the CCUs was 10%, and the odds of dying were almost six times among intubated patients compared to those who were not (AOR 5.5, 95% CI=1.1–28.1, p=0.042). Conclusion Irrational antibiotics prescribing is high in the KNH CCUs, attributable largely to incorrect choice and wrong duration of antibiotic use. Mortality was significantly associated with intubation. Intensification of management in critical care settings should be directed towards intubated patients while ensuring appropriate choice of antibiotics administered for the correct duration. Future studies should explore factors that could promote rational antibiotics use in critical care settings.

An exploratory analysis of general practitioner prescribing patterns in Malaysia using a health insurance claims database.

To determine the prescribing patterns and identify potentially inappropriate prescribing practices among general practitioners in the private primary care sector by analysing a large electronic health insurance claims database. Medical claims records from February 2019 to February 2020 were extracted from a health insurance claims database. Data cleaning and data analysis were performed using Python 3.7 with the Pandas, NumPy and Matplotlib libraries. The top five most common diagnoses were identified, and for each diagnosis, the most common medication classes and medications prescribed were quantified. Potentially inappropriate prescribing practices were identified by comparing the medications prescribed with relevant clinical guidelines. The five most common diagnoses were upper respiratory tract infection (41.5%), diarrhoea (7.7%), musculoskeletal pain (7.6%), headache (6.7%) and gastritis (4.0%). Medications prescribed by general practitioners were largely as expected for symptomatic management of the respective conditions. One area of potentially inappropriate prescribing identified was inappropriate antibiotic choice. Same-class polypharmacy that may lead to an increased risk of adverse events were also identified, primarily involving multiple paracetamol-containing products, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and antihistamines. Other areas of non-adherence to guidelines identified included the potential overuse of oral corticosteroids and oral salbutamol, and inappropriate gastroprotection for patients receiving NSAIDs. While prescribing practices are generally appropriate within the private primary care sector, there remain several areas where some potentially inappropriate prescribing occurs. The areas identified should be the focus in continuing efforts to improve prescribing practices to obtain the optimal clinical outcomes while reducing unnecessary risks and healthcare costs.

Rapid Detection of Escherichia coli Antibiotic Susceptibility Using Live/Dead Spectrometry for Lytic Agents.

Antibiotic resistance is a serious threat to public health. The empiric use of the wrong antibiotic occurs due to urgency in treatment combined with slow, culture-based diagnostic techniques. Inappropriate antibiotic choice can promote the development of antibiotic resistance. We investigated live/dead spectrometry using a fluorimeter (Optrode) as a rapid alternative to culture-based techniques through application of the LIVE/DEAD® BacLightTM Bacterial Viability Kit. Killing was detected by the Optrode in near real-time when Escherichia coli was treated with lytic antibiotics—ampicillin and polymyxin B—and stained with SYTO 9 and/or propidium iodide. Antibiotic concentration, bacterial growth phase, and treatment time used affected the efficacy of this detection method. Quantification methods of the lethal action and inhibitory action of the non-lytic antibiotics, ciprofloxacin and chloramphenicol, respectively, remain to be elucidated.

Carbapenems for the Treatment of Pneumonia: A literature review regarding resistance, risk factors, and mortality

Carbapenem is one of antibiotic to treat respiratory infections such as pneumonia that frequently used in tertiary care facilities and started to create resistances. This study aims to review the resistance of carbapenems, assess the risk factors for resistance that leads to mortality, and the more effective antibiotic treatment options to overcome the resistance. Assessment of the use of carbapenems in pneumonia through previous studies were carried out by searching the articles in search engine databases in 2011 to 2021. Articles reporting carbapenems resistance, risk factors, and mortality were selected based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. Of 14 articles included in inclusion criteria, 4 studies reported the occurrence of resistance to gram-negative bacteria such as Acinetobacter aumanii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Klebsiella pneumoniae, and 10 articles reported risk factors and mortality. The risk factors for carbapenems resistance are the history of carbapenems use, duration of hospitalization, use of mechanical ventilation, high Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS) scores, and high Acute Physiologic and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE). Carbapenems resistance causes mortality such as septic shock, high Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores, and elevated risk at > 60 years of age, female sex, and inappropriate choice of antibiotics. The results showed that imipenem has higher resistance than other carbapenems members, the risk factors for carbapenems resistance are dominated by a history of carbapenems use, mortality caused by high score SOFA, and colistin can be the current choice to overcome carbapenems resistance.

1473. Guideline Adherence in Pediatric Ambulatory Visits for Acute Otitis Media

BackgroundAcute otitis media (AOM) is the most common pediatric outpatient condition treated with antibiotics in the United States. Over 30% of children receive inappropriate antibiotics for AOM, contributing to increasing antimicrobial resistance and unnecessary adverse events. Strict adherence to diagnostic and treatment guidelines has been proposed by the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) Committee on Infectious Diseases as one strategy to combat inappropriate antibiotic use. Our objective was to describe adherence to the 2013 AAP guidelines on AOM.MethodsWe performed a cross-sectional study on a random sample of visit notes for patients 3 to 59 months old diagnosed with otitis media based on ICD-10-CM codes (H65, H66, H67) and treated with antibiotics between 9/1/2017 and 8/31/2018 in an association of pediatric practices across Massachusetts. Children with tympanostomy tubes or a chronic medical condition increasing their risk for AOM were excluded. Based on the 2013 AAP diagnostic criteria, tympanic membrane exam descriptions were reviewed and classified as describing AOM or not. Antibiotic choices were classified as appropriate or inappropriate. Notes were then labeled as “fully adherent” (exam consistent with AOM and appropriate antibiotic choice), “partially adherent” (exam inconsistent with AOM or inappropriate antibiotic choice), and “non-adherent” (exam inconsistent with AOM and inappropriate antibiotic choice).ResultsThree hundred and ninety-four visit notes from 39 different practices were analyzed. One hundred and sixty-six notes (42%) were “fully adherent” to the AAP guidelines, 183 (46%) were “partially adherent” and 45 (11%) were “non-adherent” (Figure 1). In the “partially adherent” and “non-adherent” groups combined, exams were inappropriate in 179 notes (45.4%) and antibiotic choice was inappropriate in 94 notes (23.9%). Cefdinir was the most frequent inappropriate antibiotic (44/94, 46.8%) (Table 1). “Watchful waiting” occurred in only 7% (16/229) of eligible cases.Figure 1. Breakdown of encounters by adherence type Table 1. Cross-table of indicated and prescribed antibiotics ConclusionOur analysis of independent pediatric practices showed moderate adherence to the AAP guidelines for AOM. Substantial room exists for improvement in diagnosing and treating AOM in young children, especially regarding the potential for watchful waiting.Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Antibiotics in Prevention and Treatment of Multi-Drug Resistant (MDR) Organisms causing Surgical Site Infection (SSI)

Antibiotics play a vital role in prevention and treatment of various infections. But inappropriate antibiotic choice could lead to emergence of multi-drug resistance (MDR) among microorganisms. Since, the antibiotic susceptibility pattern of organisms could vary from place to place; forming a local prophylaxis and treatment protocol could hugely reduce this global burden. The primary objectives of the study were to observe the frequency of multi-drug resistant organisms causing Surgical Site Infections (SSIs) and to study the pattern of antibiotic usage for the prophylaxis and treatment of SSIs. A descriptive study was carried out in general surgical wards of KR hospital, Mysore for a period of 18 months (2015-2016). The relevant data was collected from the case sheets of patients who were diagnosed with SSI. Pus samples were collected, and culture-sensitivity was done. Collected data were analyzed using relevant statistical tests. A total of 263 study subjects including both males and females were enrolled in the study. Cefotaxime was the most common antibiotic used for pre-surgical prophylaxis (n=221). Out of 263 pus samples 92% were culture positive. The most common organisms causing SSI were E-coli-ESBL (n=73) and MRSA (n=44). About 95% of organisms showed multi-drug resistance. Imipenem, Gentamicin, Piperacillin-Tazobactum and Linezolid were the most common antibiotics used in the treatment of SSIs. The result of the study is alarming. Overall, there is great rise in the prevalence of MDR organisms causing SSIs. The hospital antibiotic policy should be revised in such a way to decrease the emergence of MDR microbes.

Evaluating antimicrobial appropriateness in a tertiary care pediatric ICU in Saudi Arabia: a retrospective cohort study

BackgroundInappropriate antibiotic utilization is associated with the emergence of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) and a decline in antibiotic susceptibility in many pathogenic organisms isolated in intensive care units. Antibiotic stewardship programs (ASPs) have been recommended as a strategy to reduce and delay the impact of AMR. A crucial step in ASPs is understanding antibiotic utilization practices and quantifying the problem of inappropriate antibiotic use to support a targeted solution. We aim to characterize antibiotic utilization and determine the appropriateness of antibiotic prescription in a tertiary care pediatric intensive care unit.MethodsA retrospective cohort study was conducted at King Abdullah Specialized Children’s Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, over a 6-month period. Days of therapy (DOT) and DOT per 1000 patient-days were used as measures of antibiotic consumption. The appropriateness of antibiotic use was assessed by two independent pediatric infectious disease physicians based on the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 12-step Campaign to prevent antimicrobial resistance among hospitalized children.ResultsDuring the study period, 497 patients were admitted to the PICU, accounting for 3009 patient-days. A total of 274 antibiotic courses were administered over 2553 antibiotic days. Forty-eight percent of antibiotic courses were found to be nonadherent to at least 1 CDC step. The top reasons were inappropriate antibiotic choice (empirical or definitive) and inappropriate prophylaxis durations. Cefazolin and vancomycin contributed to the highest percentage of inappropriate DOTs.ConclusionsAntibiotic consumption was high with significant inappropriate utilization. These data could inform decision-making in antimicrobial stewardship programs and strategies. The CDC steps provide a more objective tool and limit biases when assessing antibiotic appropriateness

2676. Effect of β-Lactam Allergy on Appropriateness of Antibiotic Use in Patients with Febrile Neutropenia

BackgroundOver 80% of patients with hematologic malignancies develop some form of infectious complication, most commonly febrile neutropenia. Patients with febrile neutropenia have 10% mortality, which increases if antibiotic administration is delayed past 30 minutes. Studies have suggested β-lactam allergy may delay administration of antibiotic while putting patients at greater risk for inappropriate antibiotic choice and adverse effects stemming from this. We sought to describe the risks associated with β-lactam allergy in the neutropenic population.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective, descriptive study from January 2016 to December 2017 identifying patients with febrile neutropenia and a reported history of β-lactam allergy. Baseline characteristics, allergy data, treatment data, and outcomes were collected and analyzed.ResultsWe identified 31 patients with febrile neutropenia and β-lactam allergy during this time period. Etiologies of neutropenia were hematologic malignancy (61.2%), stem cell transplantation (12.9%), solid-organ malignancy (22.6%), and autoimmune (3.3%). Reported reactions to β-lactams were rash (41.9%), hives (9.7%), anaphylaxis (3.2%), other (9.7%), and unknown (35.5%). Average time to antibiotic administration was 142.5 minutes. Antibiotic choice was cefepime (61.3%), piperacillin–tazobactam (6.5%), carbapenem (22.6%), fluoroquinolone (6.5%), cefepime and fluoroquinolone (3.2%), and vancomycin (58.1%). 51.6% received initial antibiotics consistent with the 2010 IDSA guidelines. Six patients underwent penicillin skin testing, all negative. 1 patient developed C. difficile infection, 1 developed MRSA colonization, and 3 developed VRE colonization. Mortality was 3.2% at 30 days and 16.1% at 90 days.ConclusionOur study estimated the antibiotic usage patterns and outcomes in patients with febrile neutropenia and reported β-lactam allergy. This showed low adherence to an established guideline for antibiotic choice in these patients. With rising antimicrobial resistance, there is a need to develop strategies to reduce inappropriate antimicrobial use, especially in patients with febrile neutropenia. Preemptive β-lactam allergy evaluation warrants further evaluation in the neutropenic population.Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

17. Tick-borne relapsing fever: a fever syndrome mimic

17. Tick-borne relapsing fever: a fever syndrome mimic

Antibiotic choice in UK general practice: rates and drivers of potentially inappropriate antibiotic prescribing.

To identify the rates of potentially inappropriate antibiotic choice when prescribing for common infections in UK general practices. To examine the predictors of such prescribing and the clustering effects at the practice level. The rates of potentially inappropriate antibiotic choice were estimated using 1 151 105 consultations for sinusitis, otitis media and externa, upper respiratory tract infection (URTI) and lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI) and urinary tract infection (UTI), using the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD). Multilevel logistic regression was used to identify the predictors of inappropriate prescribing and to quantify the clustering effect at practice level. The rates of potentially inappropriate prescriptions were highest for otitis externa (67.3%) and URTI (38.7%) and relatively low for otitis media (3.4%), sinusitis (2.2%), LRTI (1.5%) and UTI in adults (2.3%) and children (0.7%). Amoxicillin was the most commonly prescribed antibiotic for all respiratory tract infections, except URTI. Amoxicillin accounted for 62.3% of prescriptions for otitis externa and 34.5% of prescriptions for URTI, despite not being recommended for these conditions. A small proportion of the variation in the probability of an inappropriate choice was attributed to the clustering effect at practice level (8% for otitis externa and 23% for sinusitis). Patients with comorbidities were more likely to receive a potentially inappropriate antibiotic for URTI, LRTI and UTI in adults. Patients who received any antibiotic in the 12 months before consultation were more likely to receive a potentially inappropriate antibiotic for all conditions except otitis externa. Antibiotic prescribing did not always align with prescribing guidelines, especially for URTIs and otitis externa. Future interventions might target optimizing amoxicillin use in primary care.

Post-surgical antibiotic prophylaxis: Impact of pharmacist’s educational intervention on appropriate use of antibiotics

BackgroundGuidelines assisted appropriate use of prophylactic antibiotics can lower the prevalence of surgical site infections (SSIs). The present study was conducted to evaluate the impact and cost-benefit value of pharmacist’s educational intervention for antibiotic use in post-surgical prophylaxis. MethodsA prospective quasi experimental study was conducted by enrolling 450 patients from tertiary care hospital of Lahore, Pakistan, 225 patients in each, control and intervention, arm using non-random convenient sampling. The study parameters included antibiotic indication, choice, dose, frequency, duration and associated costs. This study is registered with Chinese Clinical Trial Registry # ChiCTR-OON-17013246. Results and conclusionAfter educational intervention, in post-intervention arm, total compliance in terms of correct antibiotic choice, dose, frequency and duration increased from 1.3% to 12.4%. The rate of inappropriate antibiotic choice did not change significantly. After intervention only metronidazole utilization decreased (16%) significantly (p=0.011). Significant reductions were observed in mean duration of antibiotic prophylaxis (17%, p=0.003), average number of prescribed antibiotics (9.1%, p=0.014) and average antibiotic cost (25.7%, p=0.03), with reduction in mean hospitalization cost (p=0.003) and length of stay (p=0.023). Educational intervention was significantly associated (OR; 2.4, p=0.005) with appropriate antibiotic prophylaxis. The benefit of pharmacist intervention, mean antibiotic cost savings to mean cost of pharmacist time, was 4.8:1. Thus, the educational intervention resulted in significant reductions in the duration and average number of antibiotic use having considerable effect on therapy and hospitalization cost.

Shining a light on antibiotic selection: optimised live/dead fluorescence spectrometry for rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing

Antibiotic resistance is a serious threat to public health. The empiric use of the wrong antibiotic occurs due to urgency in treatment combined with slow, culture-based diagnostic techniques. Inappropriate antibiotic choice can promote the development of antibiotic resistance. We propose to use live/dead spectrometry as a rapid alternative to culture-based techniques through application of the LIVE/DEAD® BacLightTM Bacterial Viability Kit. We have developed a spectroscopic device (Optrode) to measure fluorescence from SYTO 9 and propidium iodide stained cells that can be used to enumerate the bacterial load. We propose a procedure using the Optrode that will take bacteria in a clinical sample, challenge with a panel of antibiotics, and measure live/dead ratios to determine the best bactericidal choice. Using calibration data we optimised the live/dead spectrometry protocol outlined in the kit instructions, improving upon media selection for growth and staining, and analytical parameters. We applied the optimised methodology to detect live and dead Escherichia coli in populations challenged with ampicillin. Killing was detected by the Optrode in near real-time when E. coli was treated with ampicillin and stained with SYTO 9 and/or PI. Following on from the promising results generated with ampicillin, live/dead spectrometry of ampicillin challenged cells was characterised in terms of antibiotic concentration, growth phase, and susceptibility to treatment for each treatment time. The generated data demonstrated that reliable detection of E. coli knockdown by ampicillin using live/dead spectrometry requires log phase cells challenged with a suitable concentration for a particular treatment time.

A single center observational study on emergency department clinician non-adherence to clinical practice guidelines for treatment of uncomplicated urinary tract infections.

BackgroundThe Emergency Department (ED) is a frequent site of antibiotic use; poor adherence with evidence-based guidelines and broad-spectrum antibiotic overuse is common. Our objective was to determine rates and predictors of inappropriate antimicrobial use in patients with uncomplicated urinary tract infections (UTI) compared to the 2010 International Clinical Practice Guidelines (ICPG).MethodsA single center, prospective, observational study of patients with uncomplicated UTI presenting to an urban ED between September 2012 and February 2014 that examined ED physician adherence to ICPG when treating uncomplicated UTIs. Clinician-directed antibiotic treatment was compared to the ICPG using a standardized case definition for non-adherence. Binomial confidence intervals and student’s t-tests were performed to evaluate differences in demographic characteristics and management between patients with pyelonephritis versus cystitis. Regression models were used to analyze the significance of various predictors to non-adherent treatment.Results103 cases met the inclusion and exclusion criteria, with 63.1 % receiving non-adherent treatment, most commonly use of a fluoroquinolone (FQ) in cases with cystitis (97.6 %). In cases with pyelonephritis, inappropriate antibiotic choice (39.1 %) and no initial IV antibiotic for pyelonephritis (39.1 %) where recommended were the most common characterizations of non-adherence. Overall, cases of cystitis were no more/less likely to receive non-adherent treatment than cases of pyelonephritis (OR 0.9, 95 % confidence interval 0.4–2.2, P = 0.90). In multivariable analysis, patients more likely to receive non-adherent treatment included those without a recent history of a UTI (OR 3.8, 95 % CI 1.3–11.4, P = 0.02) and cystitis cases with back or abdominal pain only (OR 11.4, 95 % CI 2.1–63.0, P = 0.01).ConclusionsPatients with cystitis with back or abdominal pain only were most likely to receive non-adherent treatment, potentially suggesting diagnostic inaccuracy. Physician education on evidence-based guidelines regarding the treatment of uncomplicated UTI will decrease broad-spectrum use and drug resistance in uropathogens.

The use of daily electronic prompts to help improve antimicrobial stewardship in a critical care unit.

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) represents a growing threat to public health, with the potential to reverse many of the gains made in modern medicine. AMR is contributed to by both inappropriate choice of antibiotics and inappropriate antibiotic course durations. The objective of this audit was to determine if the introduction of antimicrobial prescribing electronic prompts in an electronic patient record had a positive impact on antimicrobial stewardship. The audit examined the proportion of antibiotic prescriptions within a critical care unit in which both a valid stop date and indication were recorded. The audit was repeated on two occasions: first, after an education programme, and second, after the introduction of an electronic prompt within the patients' electronic patient record. Chi-square analyses indicated that significant improvements in both the recording of indications (χ²(4) = 39.69, P <0.0001) and stop-dates (χ²(4) = 42.10, P <0.0001) occurred across the three audits. We conclude that the novel use of daily electronic prompts has a positive impact on antimicrobial stewardship.

Antibiotics in surgical wards: use or misuse? A newly industrialized country's perspective.

Studies exploring the appropriateness of therapeutic antibiotic use among surgical patients are limited, particularly in developing countries. Therefore, the aim of our study was to determine the appropriateness of antibiotics prescribed in a surgical setting in Malaysia. A prospective observational study was conducted in two surgical wards at a tertiary hospital in Malaysia from November 2012-July 2013. Data was collected using a case report form. The appropriateness of antibiotic therapy was based on compliance with either the Malaysian National Antibiotic Guidelines 2008 or International Clinical Practice Guidelines and determined by an expert panel (consisting of two infectious disease consultants and a pharmacist). Over the study period, a total of 593 antibiotic courses were prescribed for 129 patients (4.6±3.4 antibiotics/patient). Only 34 (26.4%) patients received appropriate antibiotic therapy, whilst 95 (73.6%) patients received at least one course of inappropriate antibiotic therapy. The prevalence of inappropriate antibiotic use was 214 (66.3%) and 55 (42.0%) for prophylactic and therapeutic purposes, respectively. The most common causes of inappropriate prophylactic antibiotics were inappropriate timing 20 (36.4%) and inappropriate duration of prophylaxis 19 (34.5%). In cases of inappropriate timing, 9 (45%) were administered too late while 6 (30%) were too early. In contrast, inappropriate choice of antibiotics (42.1%) and inappropriate indication (40.7%) were the most common reasons encountered for inappropriate therapeutic antibiotics. Our study suggests considerable inappropriate use of both prophylactic and therapeutic antibiotics in the surgical wards; highlighting an urgent need for antibiotic stewardship initiatives in this setting.