Inadvertent Placement Research Articles

LAPAROSCOPIC CECOSTOMY PLACEMENT FOR ANTEGRADE ENEMA ACCESS IN THE PEDIATRIC POPULATION

AimUse of the appendix for an antegrade continence enema (ACE) is not always possible. Various methods exist for creating cecostomy tubes, including percutaneous, endoscopic, or surgical placement. We describe our laparoscopic cecostomy technique and review short- and long-term outcomes. MethodsSingle institution retrospective review of children who underwent laparoscopic cecostomy placement from June 2016 – June 2023. The cecum is secured to the abdominal wall with trans-fascial sutures and placement of an enterostomy button under direct vision. Half-volume flushes begin after 48 hours; after two weeks, patients transition to full flushes. Demographic, intraoperative, and postoperative variables were analyzed. ResultsForty patients were included [24 (60%) female; 31 (77.5%) Caucasian]. Twenty-one (52.5%) had myelomeningocele, 15 (37.5%) had an anorectal malformation and 4 (10%) had functional constipation. Twenty-five (62.5%) underwent laparoscopic cecostomy placement alone, while 15 (37.5%) had it performed with another procedure.Median operative time was 1.12 (IQR 0:93-1.45) hours for isolated cecostomy placement, with median post-operative stay of 2.0 days (2.2 - 3.1) days. Post-operatively, one patient had severe withholding, ultimately requiring a diverting ileostomy. No other 30-day complications (surgical site infection, tube removal) were identified. One patient required revision four months post-op due to inadvertent placement in the sigmoid. At one-year follow-up, 11/36 (30.6%) children noted granulation tissue, and 11 (30.6%) noted superficial leakage. Two (6%) patients had transitioned to oral laxatives. ConclusionLaparoscopic cecostomy tube placement is a safe and alternative method of developing ACE access that can be done concurrently with other procedures.

Keep Right: Inadvertent Placement of a Temporary Pacing Lead in the Left Ventricle

Keep Right: Inadvertent Placement of a Temporary Pacing Lead in the Left Ventricle

A Rare Case of Uvulitis Following Endotracheal Intubation Using C- Mac Videolaryngoscope and How To Avoid It

Uvular injuries are uncommon after general anesthesia and can result from direct trauma to the posterior part of the soft palate or compression and restriction of blood flow to the uvula caused by the inadvertent placement of the airway or suction devices in the oral cavity. There have been cases of inflammation and ulceration occurring in the midline oropharyngeal structures such as the uvula after general anesthesia with a tube or laryngeal mask airway, even in the absence of direct trauma or infection, presumably due to compression ischemia. While sore throat following general anesthesia is a common symptom, it is important to evaluate any severe or persistent pain to exclude uvulitis. Here we present a case of uvulitis that developed after the insertion of a flexometallic endotracheal tube using the midline technique during C-Mac video laryngoscopy. We also emphasize the measures that can be implemented to prevent such a complication. The entrapment of the uvula during intubation often goes unnoticed due to limited oral space after insertion of the video laryngoscope blade, with the intubating anesthetist staying focused on the monitor. This complication following the use of a C-Mac video laryngoscope has not been previously documented.

Intrathecal placement of percutaneous spinal cord stimulation leads: illustrative cases.

Spinal cord stimulation (SCS), including the percutaneous placement of epidural stimulation leads, has been increasingly utilized to treat chronic pain. Although lead migration is a well-characterized complication, few studies have reported on malpositioned leads in the intrathecal space. Here, the authors discuss two cases of intrathecal lead placement necessitating surgical revision. This report is a two-case series on the inadvertent placement of percutaneous SCS leads in the intrathecal space. The authors describe the identification of malpositioned leads, describe the clinical presentation, characterize stimulation parameters, and report improvement following neurosurgical revision for each case. Two patients originally presenting with chronic low-back pain underwent percutaneous SCS lead implantation. Both patients presented with atypical pain symptoms in the acute to subacute postprocedural period, raising suspicion for malpositioned leads. Imaging was consistent with intrathecal malpositioning. Both patients underwent revision surgery resulting in symptomatic improvement. Indicators of malpositioned thoracic SCS leads in the intrathecal space include thoracoabdominal or flank pain exacerbated by movement, insufficient pain relief versus that in the SCS trial, very low electrode impedances, direct visualization on imaging, and lack of epidural lead visualization following laminectomy. Revision options include removal of the intrathecal leads and the surgical placement of a paddle electrode in the epidural space. https://thejns.org/doi/10.3171/CASE24275.

FACTFINDERS FOR PATIENT SAFETY: Minimizing risks with cervical epidural injections

This series of FactFinders presents a brief summary of the evidence and outlines recommendations to minimize risks associated with cervical epidural injections.Evidence in support of the following facts is presented.Minimizing Risks with Cervical Interlaminar Epidural Steroid Injections – 1) CILESIs should be performed at C6-C7 or below, with C7-T1 as the preferred access point due to the more generous dorsal epidural space at this level compared to the more cephalad interlaminar segments. This reduces the risk of the minor complication of dural puncture and the major complication of spinal cord injury due to inadvertent needle placement. 2) LF gaps are most prevalent in the midline cervical spine. This can result in diminished tactile feedback with loss of resistance (LOR), increasing the risk for inadvertent dural puncture or spinal cord injury. Based on current evidence, needle placement in the paramedian portion of the interlaminar space is safest to avoid LF gaps. 3) An optimal AP trajectory view and the physician's ability to discern engagement in the LF and subsequent LOR are crucial. Confirmation of minimal needle insertion depth relative to the ventral margin of the lamina with either a lateral or contralateral oblique (CLO) safety view is critical to minimize the risk of inadvertently inserting the needle too ventral. 4) There have been closed claims and case reports of patients who have suffered catastrophic neurologic injuries while receiving CILESIs under deep sedation. If sedation is administered, the least amount necessary should be utilized to ensure the patient can provide verbal feedback during the procedure. 5) CILESIs are an elective procedure; therefore, necessity and likelihood of benefit must be foremost considerations. Current guidelines recommend holding ACAP therapy before CILESIs due to the potentially catastrophic complications associated with epidural hematoma (EH) formation. However, there is also a risk of severe systemic complications with ceasing ACAP in specific clinical scenarios. The treating physician is obligated to determine if the procedure is indicated and can ultimately decide to delay the intervention or not perform the procedure if the benefit does not outweigh the risks.Minimizing Risks with Cervical Transforaminal Epidural Steroid Injections – the Role of Preprocedural Review of Advanced Imaging -- Variations in vascular anatomy may warrant a modified approach to CTFESI. Preprocedural review of cross-sectional imaging can provide critical information for safe injection angle planning specific to individual patients and may help to decrease the risk of unintended vascular events with potentially catastrophic outcomes.Safety of Multi-level or Bilateral Fluoroscopically-Guided Cervical Transforaminal Epidural Steroid Injections -- Safe performance of a CTFESI procedure requires the ability to detect inadvertent arterial injection. Contrast medium placed into the epidural space and/or along the exiting spinal nerves during an initial CTFESI may obscure the detection of inadvertent cannulation of a radiculomedullary artery by a subsequent CTFESI. While no available literature directly addresses the potential risk that exists with a multi-level or bilateral CTFESI, caution is still warranted.

Reducing Lung Injury from Blind Insertion of Small-Bore Feeding Tubes.

Using a blind insertion technique to insert small-bore feeding tubes can result in inadvertent placement in the lungs, leading to lung perforation and even mortality. In a Magnet-designated, 500-bed, level 2 trauma center, two serious patient safety events occurred in a four-week period due to nurses blindly inserting a small-bore feeding tube. A patient safety event review team convened and conducted an assessment of reported small-bore feeding tube insertion events that occurred between March 2019 and July 2021. The review revealed six lung perforations over this two-year period. These events prompted the creation of a multidisciplinary team to evaluate alternative small-bore feeding tube insertion practices. The team reviewed the literature and evaluated several evidence-based small-bore feeding tube placement methods, including placement with fluoroscopy, a two-step X-ray, electromagnetic visualization, and capnography. After the evaluation, capnography was selected as the most effective method to mitigate the complications of blind insertion. In this article, the authors describe a quality improvement project involving the implementation of capnography-guided small-bore feeding tube placement to reduce complications and the incidence of lung perforation. Since the completion of the project, which took place from December 13, 2021, through April 18, 2022, no lung injuries or perforations have been reported. Capnography is a relatively simple, noninvasive, and cost-effective technology that provides nurses with a means to safely and effectively insert small-bore feeding tubes, decrease the incidence of adverse events, and improve patient care.

Navigating the layers of concern for safe dry needling of the rectus abdominis: a cadaveric study

ABSTRACT Objectives To assess needle placement accuracy in the rectus abdominis (RA) muscle during dry needling (DN) without entering the peritoneum. Methods Two physical therapists performed DN on a cadaver, making 10 attempts each to needle the RA without entering the peritoneum. Techniques followed two common DN approaches. Ultrasound verified needle depth and safety. Results Seventy percent of attempts were recorded as safe needle placement, while 30% were unsafe. Accurate RA needle placement without peritoneal entry occurred in 55% of attempts. Discussion/Conclusion Inadvertent peritoneal needle placement during RA DN poses risks regardless of experience. Ultrasound guidance may enhance safety and precision in clinical practice.

An innovative method to prevent guidewire access to the ipsilateral internal jugular vein during pediatric subclavian vein cannulation

ObjectivesCatheter misplacement into the internal jugular vein (IJV) often occurs during pediatric subclavian vein (SCV) catheter placement. The aim of this study was to investigate whether an innovative method of occluding the IJV by applying temporary pressure at the IJV just above the clavicle could help prevent its occurrence. DesignThis is a randomized controlled trial. SettingsThis study was conducted in a single medical center. ParticipantsOne hundred and seventy-eight children undergoing SCV catheterization were recruited. InterventionsChildren were randomly assigned to the traditional group (unassisted placement of the guidewire) and the innovative group (temporary pressure on the IJV just above the clavicle to occlude the IJV during placement of the guidewire). Measurements and Main ResultsThe primary outcome was the incidence of guidewire misplacement into the IJV at the time of first placement. Secondary outcomes included the total number of attempts and the total time of guidewire placement. The incidence of misplacement at the first attempts was reduced from 18.06% in group C to 6.67% in group I (P=0.04). The total number of guidewire entered the IJV in group I was less than in group C [group C vs. group I = 24/96 vs. 7/82, P=0.005]; the total time of guidewire placement was reduced from 35.00s (18.25s, 54.00s) in group C to 26.00s (17.00s, 38.00s) in group I, (P=0.03). ConclusionsTemporary pressure at the IJV just above the clavicle to occlude the IJV during placement of the guidewire helps prevent inadvertent placement of the guidewire into the IJV.

Factors associated with an inadvertent dural puncture or post-dural puncture headache following labour epidural analgesia: A retrospective cohort study

Inadvertent dural puncture and post-dural puncture headache are complications of labour epidural analgesia and may result in acute and chronic morbidity. Identification of risk factors may enable pre-emptive management and reduce associated morbidity. In this retrospective cohort study, we aimed to identify factors associated with an inadvertent dural puncture or post-dural puncture headache by identifying parturients who received labour epidural analgesia from January 2017 to December 2021. The primary outcome was any witnessed inadvertent dural puncture, inadvertent placement of an intrathecal catheter, clinical diagnosis of post-dural puncture headache, or headache that was assessed to have characteristic post-dural puncture headache features. A wide range of demographic, obstetric, and anaesthetic factors were analysed using univariate and multivariable analyses to identify independent associations with the primary outcome.Data from 26,395 parturients were analysed, of whom 94 (0.36%) had the primary outcome. Within these 94 parturients, 26 (27.7%) had inadvertent dural puncture, 30 (31.9%) had inadvertent intrathecal catheter, and 38 (40.4%) had post-dural puncture headache without documented inadvertent dural puncture or intrathecal catheter insertion. Increased number of procedure attempts (adjusted odds ratio 1.39, 95% confidence interval 1.19 to 1.63), longer procedure duration adjusted odds ratio 1.03, 95% confidence interval 1.01 to 1.05), increased depth of epidural space (adjusted odds ratio 1.10, 95% confidence interval 1.04 to 1.18), greater post-procedure Bromage score (adjusted odds ratio 7.70, 95% confidence interval 4.22 to 14.05), and breakthrough pain (adjusted odds ratio 3.97, 95% confidence interval 2.59 to 6.08) were independently associated with increased odds of the primary outcome, while the use of standard patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) regimen (adjusted odds ratio 0.50, 95%confidence interval 0.31 to 0.81), increased concentration of ropivacaine (adjusted odds ratio 0.08 per 0.1%, 95% confidence interval 0.02 to 0.46), and greater satisfaction score (adjusted odds ratio 0.96, 95% confidence interval 0.95 to 0.97) were associated with reduced odds. The area under curve of this multivariable model was 0.83.We identified independent association factors suggesting that greater epidural depth and procedure difficulty may increase the odds of inadvertent dural puncture or post-dural puncture headache.

Monitored epidural catheter placement-ultrasound-guided neurostimulation-aided thoracic catheter placement via caudal route for perioperative analgesia in neonatal thoracotomies: A technical feasibility study.

In this case series, we investigated the feasibility of combining ultrasound and neurostimulation for inserting a stimulating epidural catheter in the thoracic epidural space through the caudal route in neonates. Twelve neonates undergoing tracheo-oesophageal fistula repair under general anaesthesia were studied. The catheter was visible on ultrasound as a hyperechoic dot in the epidural space. Inadvertent high placement was identified in two neonates with neurostimulation, in whom the catheter was withdrawn to the thoracic epidural space, and the position was confirmed on ultrasound. A 0.5 ml/kg bolus dose of 0.125% bupivacaine injected through the epidural catheter was imaged in real-time in the epidural space. Block was effective in 10 neonates; two needed an additional local anaesthetic (LA) bolus. To conclude, ultrasound with neurostimulation facilitates accurate positioning of the caudally placed epidural catheter to the mid-thoracic level in neonates.

Iatrogenic injury of aortic valve leaflet during mitral valve replacement: A transesophageal echocardiographic finding

Iatrogenic aortic valve injury during non-aortic cardiac surgery is an infrequent complication. Iatrogenic aortic regurgitation (AR) has been reported after mitral valve repair, aortic valve repair, septal myomectomy, closure of the ventricular septal defect, and atrial septal defect repair. Various causes have been reported for AR after non-aortic cardiac surgery. Perforation of the aortic valve leaflet is a common cause of AR. Other causes of AR are leaflet tension and leaflet retraction due to inadvertent suture placement. A few previous case reports have presented severe AR as a complication of iatrogenic involvement of aortic valve leaflet during MV surgery. We report a case of severe AR and severe aortic stenosis occurring immediately after mitral valve replacement. This was diagnosed intraoperatively by Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) and aortic valve replacement was done.

Relining of a Bridging Covered Stent to Treat a Rare Cause of Type IIIc Endoleak Following Fenestrated Endovascular Aneurysm Repair.

To present a rare cause of type III endoleak via the left renal artery (LRA) fenestration following fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair (FEVAR) and to describe a successful reintervention for treating this endoleak. The patient presented with a type IIIc endoleak following FEVAR, due to inadvertent placement of the LRA bridging balloon expandable covered stent (BECS) via the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) fenestration, but deployed outside the SMA fenestration. The proximal part of the BECS was positioned outside of the main body. This caused a type IIIc endoleak via the open LRA fenestration. Reintervention was performed by relining the LRA with a new BECS. First, access to the lumen of the previously placed BECS was gained using a re-entry catheter, followed by placement of a new BECS via the LRA fenestration. Completion angiography, and computerized tomography angiography (CTA) at 3 months follow-up showed total obliteration of the endoleak and patency of the LRA. Placement of a bridging stent via an incorrect fenestration during FEVAR is a rare cause of type III endoleak. In certain cases, successful treatment of such an endoleak could be achieved by perforation and relining of the misplaced BECS via the correct fenestration of the target vessel. To our best knowledge, a type IIIc endoleak following fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair, due to placement of a bridging covered stent through an incorrect fenestration and deployed short of the fenestration, has not been described before. Reintervention was performed with perforation of the previously placed covered stent and relining using a new bridging covered stent. The technique presented here was successful for treating the endoleak in this case and could help guide clinicians when dealing with this or similar complications.

P88 Subdural spinal haematoma following presumed inadvertent subdural catheter placement during labour

P88 Subdural spinal haematoma following presumed inadvertent subdural catheter placement during labour

Preventing unrecognized esophageal intubation in the emergency department.

Tracheal intubation is a commonly performed procedure on critically ill patients in the emergency department. It is associated with many serious complications, one of the most dangerous being unrecognized esophageal intubation, which can result in anoxic brain injury, cardiac arrest, or death. It is the responsibility of the emergency physician to do everything possible to avoid this devastating complication. Preventing unrecognized esophageal intubation requires a two-pronged approach. First, the inadvertent placement of intended tracheal tubes into the esophagus must be reduced as much as is humanly possible. This can be achieved with the routine use of video laryngoscopes for emergency department intubations. Numerous studies have demonstrated that use of video laryngoscopes can significantly reduce the occurrence of esophageal intubation, presumablyby providing an improved view of the larynx. Second, if an esophageal intubation inadvertently occurs, it must be rapidly identified and appropriately addressed. The cornerstone of rapid identification is the use of continuous waveform capnography to detect exhaled carbon dioxide. Capnography has been shown to be the most accurate method to determine tube placement after intubation. Standard clinical examinations, for example, auscultation of breath sounds, visualization of chest excursion, and observation of condensation in the tube, have all been demonstrated in studies to be unreliable and thus should not be used to exclude esophageal intubation. Recently, the Project for Universal Management of Airways, an international collaborative of airway experts from anesthesiology, critical care and emergency medicine, published evidence-based guidelines to specifically address the issue of preventing unrecognized esophageal intubation. These guidelines, which have received endorsement from several prominent airway societies, including the Society for Airway Management, the Difficult Airway Society, and the European Airway Management Society, will be briefly discussed in this review.

Identification and Subsequent Extraction of an Atrial Pacing Lead Inadvertently Positioned Within the Pulmonary Venous Atrium of a Patient With D-Transposition of the Great Arteries.

In a male patient with D-transposition of the great arteries post Mustard repair, we report the inadvertent placement of an atrial pacemaker lead across the baffle into the pulmonary venous atrium managed with extraction and re-implantation.

1101 AN UNUSUAL CASE OF PHRENIC NERVE STIMULATION IN A PATIENT WITH SINGLE CHAMBER IMPLANTABLE CARDIOVERTER DEFIBRILLATOR

Abstract Background Phrenic nerve stimulation is a well-recognized complication related to cardiac implantable electronic devices, in particular with left ventricular coronary sinus pacing leads for cardiac resynchronization therapy. Case presentation We report an unusual case of symptomatic phrenic nerve stimulation due to inadvertent placement of a right ventricular defibrillation lead in coronary sinus posterior branch in a patient with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction with a recently implanted single-chamber cardioverter defibrillator. Discussion Phrenic nerve stimulation is a relatively common complication of left ventricular pacing. Inadvertent placement of a right ventricular lead in a coronary sinus branch is a rare but possible cause of phrenic nerve stimulation. Careful evaluation of intraprocedural fluoroscopic and electrocardiographic appearance of pacing and defibrillation leads during implantation may prevent inadvertent placement of a right ventricular lead in the coronary sinus.

Iatrogenic Portobiliary Fistula following Endoscopic Biliary Stent Placement: A Case Series and Review of the Literature

Iatrogenic portobiliary fistula is a rare adverse event following endoscopic biliary stent placement. Damage to the portal vein following endoscopic biliary stent placement has previously only been reported as single case reports. Management has ranged from conservative monitoring to surgery. Here, the authors present 4 cases of inadvertent endoscopic placement of a biliary stent into the portal vein. Interventional radiology was called to assist in the management of each of these cases. The experience presented here in conjunction with review of the previously reported cases helps shed light on potential management strategies if this adverse event is encountered in the future.

Ureteral Obstruction Due to Inadvertent Placement of the Suprapubic Catheter and Bladder Indwelling Catheter: Presentation of Two Clinical Cases and Review of the Literature

Introduction: Suprapubic catheter (SPC) and bladder indwelling catheter (BIC) placement are among the most common urological procedures. Inadvertent misplacement of the catheter tip into the ureteral orifice is an infrequent event with potentially critical complications. Case Presentation: We describe two cases of inadvertent intraureteral misplacement of an SPC and a BIC. A 66-year-old man with chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage G3b, urethral stenosis, long-term SPC who attended the emergency room (ER) 6 hours after the last catheter replacement due to low back pain, fever, deterioration of the general condition, anuria, acute kidney injury (AKI); CT-scan revealed a left uretero-hydronephrosis secondary to obstruction of the catheter balloon misplaced inside the distal ureter. A 59-year-old woman with CKD stage G3b, post-radiotherapy cystitis, and small capacity bladder, long-term BIC who attended the ER a few hours after the last BIC replacement due to abdominal pain, anuria, AKI; CT-scan revealed left hydronephrosis secondary to catheter obstruction within the distal ureter. In both patients, management was conservative, consisting of removing the catheter and repositioning it inside the bladder, in addition to hydration and antibiotherapy. Conclusions: These cases illustrate that awareness of this rare complication can be prevented by confirming the correct positioning of SPC or BIC after its replacement. Early detection and management of this complication can prevent a serious clinical setting.

PARTIAL ANOMALOUS PULMONARY VENOUS CONNECTION DIAGNOSED AFTER CENTRAL VENOUS CATHETER PLACEMENT

PARTIAL ANOMALOUS PULMONARY VENOUS CONNECTION DIAGNOSED AFTER CENTRAL VENOUS CATHETER PLACEMENT

IATROGENIC PNEUMOMEDIASTINUM AND PNEUMOTHORAX AFTER SMALL-BORE FEEDING TUBE PLACEMENT IN A PATIENT WITH EHLERS-DANLOS SYNDROME

IATROGENIC PNEUMOMEDIASTINUM AND PNEUMOTHORAX AFTER SMALL-BORE FEEDING TUBE PLACEMENT IN A PATIENT WITH EHLERS-DANLOS SYNDROME