This research investigates how individuals’ regulatory orientations influence their utilization of store promotions through two meticulously designed studies in distinct contexts. The first study examines innate cognitive inclinations, while the second manipulates cognitive orientations within specific contexts. The findings reveal a significant relationship between regulatory orientations and store promotion usage, which is moderated by impulsivity and engagement levels. Importantly, this study addresses a critical gap in the existing literature by examining the same concept from two distinct cognitive perspectives, enhancing our understanding of the intricate interplay between regulatory orientations and store promotion utilization. The implications are twofold. Firstly, for retailers, this research offers practical significance by suggesting in-store promotions specially tailored for promotion-oriented individuals and more deliberative out-of-store promotions to capture the attention of prevention-oriented individuals, ultimately enhancing marketing effectiveness. Secondly, from a theoretical standpoint, this study contributes to a deeper understanding of the complex relationship between regulatory orientations, cognitive processes, and consumer behavior, thus enriching the theoretical foundation of the field. This research is particularly relevant to scholars and practitioners in marketing, psychology, and retail management, providing valuable insights into consumer behavior and the formulation of marketing strategies.
Read full abstract