The authors have undertaken an interesting laboratory experimental research program to validate the results of numerical analyses studies done previously (El-Taher and Moore 2008; Mai et al. 2012) to evaluate by rational means the stability of buried culverts with varying degrees of deterioration. The overall intent of the rational approach is to identify quantitatively when a culvert structure has deteriorated to such an extent that rehabilitation of the structure is warranted. This approach could result in considerable savings in costly infrastructure repair or replacement if the remaining life of a structure could be evaluated without subjectivity. The vast majority of corrugated steel pipes (CSPs) along a highway system are often composed of circular pipes or culverts of 600–900 mm diameter used in small watercourses that cross the highway alignment and at entrances to residences adjacent to the highway whereas large-diameter structural plate CSPs (SPCSPs) or multiplates, as they are frequently called, are used typically as bridgesized culverts and underpass structures. According to the Ontario Highway Bridge Design Code (Ministry of Transportation Ontario 1992), such structures classified as bridge structures are 3 m or more in diameter, whereas in Alberta, culverts of 1.5 m in diameter or greater are classified as bridge structures. The authors’ experimental results have brought out some interesting findings regarding corrosion and stiffness of the structure and backfill or the lack thereof on the structural performance of the structures. However, one aspect that was not addressed that may be important is the documented history of pipe installation in relation to any defects of the structure noted prior to and during installation. This could be important to the continued use of the structure because it would tend to provide baseline information that can be used to determine reasons why the lack of structural stability had originated or what effect the initial defects have on the structure stability other than or in addition to loss of structure thickness caused by corrosion. It is realized that this would be a significant effort by highway departments. However, with the large sums of money required for large SPSCP structure rehabilitation, the effort would be well worth the time and cost because these records should be available as a matter of quality control and quality assurance for the installation of every structure, rather than relying on the assumption that the installation was undertaken as per specifications regarding backfill density, material characteristics, and so forth. Very often, CSPs and SPSCPs are damaged during the installation process, for example, by backfill material placed over the crown containing rockfill and lack of care for the structure by equipment during the installation process. In such cases, the culvert is often deemed acceptable from visual observation because the damage may be considered not to affect the hydraulic capacity much, and, being a new structure, the structural integrity aspect is not considered inadequate. For significant multiplate structures, instrumenting these structures to evaluate the in-service structural behavior with time would also be of valued importance and could be somewhat similar to the approach being used to evaluate existing piled foundations for reuse. This aspect would also be important to understanding which type of installation damage would warrant that an installation be rejected and the installation redone with new materials. This aspect is often a contentious issue between the client and contractor, with the contractor often arguing that the integrity of the culvert is not compromised whether constructed with multiplates or SPCSP. For SPCSP structures, other modes of distress such as bolt shearing, for example, resulting from ground settlement that results in distortion of the crown and invert can eventually lead to collapse of the structure. The need for a rational approach to assessment is, therefore, very relevant. The findings of this research program would tend to indicate that installation damage may have a penalty on the performance of such a structure with time because the distortion of the crown could cause deflection around the circumference of the culvert, as shown in Figs. 4 and 5 of the authors’ paper. With in-service deterioration of the plate thickness attributable to corrosion and abrasion, this would further decrease the integrity of the structure. Overall, the authors’ paper has provided very pertinent information in assessing the stability of culvert structures to determine when repair and/or replacement is required, but it also has merits in quality control and quality-assessment evaluations during installation of these structures. Procedures for use of the rational approach separately or together with the visual-inspection approach would be of benefit to practitioners. It also would have been of interest if the authors had presented in the figures the results of the numerical analyses for comparison with those obtained from the experimental program.
Read full abstract