In-hospital Medication Research Articles

The Impact of Real-Time Documentation of In-Hospital Medication Changes on Preventing Undocumented Discrepancies at Discharge and Improving Physician-Pharmacist Communication: A Retrospective Cohort Study and Survey.

Transitional medication safety is crucial, as miscommunication about medication changes can lead to significant risks. Unclear or incomplete documentation during care transitions can result in outdated or incorrect medication lists at discharge, potentially causing medication errors, adverse drug events, and inadequate patient education. These issues are exacerbated by extended hospital stays and multiple care events, making accurate medication recall challenging at discharge. Thus, we aimed to investigate how real-time documentation of in-hospital medication changes prevents undocumented medication changes at discharge and improves physician-pharmacist communication. We conducted a retrospective cohort study in a tertiary hospital. Two pharmacists reviewed medical records of patients admitted to the acute medical unit from April to June 2020. In-hospital medication discrepancies were determined by comparing preadmission and hospitalization medication lists and it was verified whether the physician's intent of medication changes was clarified by documentation. By a documentation rate of medication changes of 100% and <100%, respectively, fully documented (FD) and partially documented (PD) groups were defined. Any undocumented medication changes at discharge were considered a "documentation error at discharge". Pharmacists' survey was conducted to assess the impact of appropriate documentation on the pharmacists. After reviewing 400 medication records, patients were categorized into FD (61.3%) and PD (38.8%) groups. Documentation errors at discharge were significantly higher in the PD than in the FD group. Factors associated with documentation errors at discharge included belonging to the PD group, discharge from a non-hospitalist-managed ward, and having three or more intentional discrepancies. Pharmacists showed favorable attitudes towards physician's documentation. Appropriate documentation of in-hospital medication changes, facilitated by free-text communication, significantly decreased documentation errors at discharge. This analysis underlines the importance of communication between pharmacists and hospitalists in improving patient safety during transitions of care.

#1259 Relationship between renal dysfunction, non-obstructive ACS and in-hospital prognosis: findings from the CCC-ACS project

Abstract Background and Aims Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is an acute and critical condition of coronary heart disease (CHD) with high mortality and poor prognosis. The prevalence of non-obstructive ACS is about 5% ∼ 15%. Among patients with non-obstructive ACS, which patients are more prone to poor prognosis is a concern. Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is an important risk factor for cardiovascular disease, and due to its special pathophysiological mechanism, non-obstructive ACS may not be uncommon in CKD patients. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between renal function, the occurrence and prognosis of non-obstructive ACS. Method Improving Care for Cardiovascular Disease in China - Acute Coronary Syndrome (CCC-ACS), a hospital-based medical quality improvement project, is a hospital-based medical quality improvement project to improve the compliance of ACS guidelines in China and improve the prognosis of patients. It was jointly sponsored by the American Heart Association (AHA) and the Chinese Society of Cardiology (CSC) in 2014, with 240 hospitals participating, representing different levels of ACS management in Chinese hospitals. We analyzed patients who underwent coronary angiography from November 2014 to July 2019 in CCC-ACS. Patients were divided into eGFR &amp;lt;60 ml/min·1.73 m² and eGFR≥60 ml/min·1.73 m² groups according to estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) calculated by the EPI formula. According to the results of coronary angiography, the patients were divided into obstructive ACS group and non-obstructive ACS group (obstructive ACS group was defined as at least one coronary artery stenosis ≥ 50%; the others were non-obstructive ACS group). Outcome was defined as in-hospital all-cause mortality and in-hospital MACEs. Results A total of 77 586 patients were included, including 2 292 patients (3.0%) with non-obstructive ACS and 75 294 patients (97.0%) with obstructive ACS. After adjusting for confounding factors using a multivariate logistic regression model, patients with eGFR&amp;lt;60 ml/min·1.73 m² had an approximately 20% increased risk of non-obstructive ACS compared with patients with eGFR≥60 ml/min·1.73 m². The comparison of in-hospital outcomes between the patients with non-obstructive ACS and obstructive ACS is shown in Fig. 1. In-hospital outcomes showed that although the obstructive ACS group had a worse in-hospital prognosis than the non-obstructive ACS group, and the eGFR&amp;lt;60 ml/min·1.73 m² group had a worse in-hospital prognosis than the eGFR≥60 ml/min·1.73 m² group, further grouping of patients showed that the non-obstructive ACS group with eGFR&amp;lt;60 ml/min·1.73 m² had a worse prognosis than the obstructive ACS group with eGFR≥60 ml/min·1.73 m². Confounding factors adjusted for non-obstructive ACS showed that lower eGFR was associated with a higher risk of in-hospital MACEs. After analyzing the in-hospital medication and discharge medication of patients, it was found that the standardized cardiovascular drug therapy was inadequate in patients with non-obstructive ACS. Conclusion Patients with non-obstructive ACS have worse renal function than patients with obstructive ACS, and the proportion of patients with eGFR&amp;lt;60 ml/min·1.73 m² is higher. In patients with non-obstructive ACS, the risk of in-hospital MACEs significantly increased as eGFR decreased. This suggests that we may consider giving standardized cardiovascular drug therapy to patients with non-obstructive ACS, especially those with non-obstructive ACS combined with abnormal renal function, in order to improve the prognosis of patients. This needs to be confirmed by more randomized controlled trial results.

Effects of different treatments for type 2 diabetes mellitus on mortality of coronavirus disease from 2019 to 2021 in China: a multi-institutional retrospective study.

The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic has continued for 5 years. Sporadic cases continue to occur in different locations. Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is associated with a high risk of a poor prognosis in patients with COVID-19. Successful control of blood glucose levels can effectively decrease the risks of severe infections and mortality. However, the effects of different treatments were reported differently and even adversely. This retrospective study included 4,922 patients who have been diagnosed as COVID-19 and T2DM from 138 Hubei hospitals. The clinical characteristics and outcomes were compared and calculated their risk for death using multivariate Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier curves. After adjustment of age, sex, comorbidities, and in-hospital medications, metformin and alpha-glucosidase inhibitor (AGI) use performed lower all-cause mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.41; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.24-0.71; p = 0.001 for metformin; 0.53, 0.35-0.80, p = 0.002 for AGIs), while insulin use was associated with increased all-cause mortality (adjusted HR, 2.07, 95% CI, 1.61-2.67, p < 0.001). After propensity score-matched (PSM) analysis, adjusted HRs for insulin, metformin, and AGIs associated with all-cause mortality were 1.32 (95% CI, 1.03-1.81; p = 0.012), 0.48 (95% CI, 0.23-0.83, p = 0.014), and 0.59 (95% CI, 0.35-0.98, p = 0.05). Therefore, metformin and AGIs might be more suitable for patients with COVID-19 and T2DM while insulin might be used with caution.

Effect of an in-hospital medication self-management intervention (SelfMED) on medication adherence in polypharmacy patients postdischarge: protocol of a pre–post intervention study

IntroductionHealthcare providers usually manage medication for patients during hospitalisation, although patients are expected to self-manage their medication after discharge. A lack of self-management competencies is found to be associated with...

Qualitative Insights Into Patients' and Family Members’ Experiences of In-Hospital Medication Management After a Critical Care Episode

BackgroundPatient recovery after a critical illness can be protracted, requiring a care continuum that extends along a patient pathway from the critical care unit, hospital ward and into the community care setting. High-quality care on patient transfer from critical care, including medication safety, is facilitated by education for patients and families, family engagement, support systems and healthcare professional-patient communication. Currently, there is uncertainty on how healthcare professionals can and should engage with critical care patients and family members about their medication. Research QuestionWe aimed to explore the views and experiences of critical care patients and family members about their involvement, communication, understanding, and decision making related to their medication following transfer from critical care to the hospital ward. Study Design and MethodsQualitative study, using semi-structured interviews, conducted with critical care patients and family members after transfer from critical care to a hospital ward in a large National Health Service hospital Trust. Anonymized transcripts of interviews were thematically analysed using a coding framework developed from understandings of patient and family engagement in their medication. ResultsTwenty-seven participants (15 patients and 12 family members of patients) completed the interviews. We identified five themes and 15 sub-themes, providing an overview of patients and family members’ views on their medication management during their acute illness and ongoing recovery. Themes identified were: Impact of acute illness and treatment burden on pre-existing illness; Pre-existing knowledge and capability; Beliefs about persons roles and expectations; Care continuity and individualised information exchange; and Engagement in practice. InterpretationCritical care patients and family members want to engage with healthcare professionals about their medication. Health care professionals must take an individualized approach to communication and timing, acknowledging the dynamic interplay between patients and family members, using multimodal forms of communication.

Quality indicators for appropriate in-hospital pharmacotherapeutic stewardship: An international modified Delphi study.

In-hospital prescribing errors may result in patient harm, such as prolonged hospitalisation and hospital (re)admission, and may be an emotional burden for the prescribers and healthcare professionals involved. Despite efforts, in-hospital prescribing errors and related harm still occur, necessitating an innovative approach. We therefore propose a novel approach, in-hospital pharmacotherapeutic stewardship (IPS). The aim of this study was to reach consensus on a set of quality indicators (QIs) as a basis for IPS. A three-round modified Delphi procedure was performed. Potential QIs were retrieved from two systematic searches of the literature, in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) statement. In two written questionnaires and a focus meeting (held between the written questionnaire rounds), potential QIs were appraised by an international, multidisciplinary expert panel composed of members of the European Association for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics (EACPT). The expert panel rated 59 QIs and four general statements, of which 35 QIs were accepted with consensus rates ranging between 79% and 97%. These QIs describe the activities of an IPS programme, the team delivering IPS, the patients eligible for the programme and the outcome measures that should be used to evaluate the care delivered. A framework of 35 QIs for an IPS programme was systematically developed. These QIs can guide hospitals in setting up a pharmacotherapeutic stewardship programme to reduce in-hospital prescribing errors and improve in-hospital medication safety.

Predischarge death or lung transplantation in tracheostomy and ventilator dependent grade 3 bronchopulmonary dysplasia.

Premature infants surviving beyond a postmenstrual age (PMA) of 36 weeks with severe or grade 3 bronchopulmonary dysplasia (sBPD) have significant predischarge mortality. The in-hospital mortality for BPD supported by invasive mechanical ventilation beyond 36 weeks PMA is not well described. The role of lung transplantation in treating severe BPD is uncertain. We studied our experience over 20 years to better define the predischarge mortality of infants with progressive grade 3 BPD and whether lung transplant is a feasible intervention. Data were obtained from a retrospective review of medical records from Children's Minnesota over a 20-year period (1997-2016). Inclusion criteria included prematurity <32 weeks PMA, BPD, tracheostomy for chronic respiratory failure, and survival beyond 36 weeks PMA. Collected data included perinatal demographics, in-hospital medications and interventions, level of respiratory support, and outcomes. In all, 2374 infants were identified who survived beyond 36 weeks PMA with a diagnosis of <32 weeks gestation prematurity and BPD. Of these, 143/2374 (6.0%) survived beyond 36 weeks PMA and required invasive mechanical ventilation with subsequent tracheostomy for management. Among these patients, discharge to home with tracheostomy occurred in 127/143 (88.8%), and predischarge death or lung transplantation occurred in 16/143 (11.2%). Deteriorating cardiopulmonary status was associated with pulmonary hypertension, prolonged hypoxemic episodes and the need for deep sedation or neuromuscular relaxation. Three of four patients referred for lung transplantation had >5-year survival, chronic allograft rejection, and mild to moderate developmental delays. Chronic respiratory failure requiring invasive mechanical ventilation for grade 3 BPD is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. For selected patients and their families, timely referral for lung transplantation is a viable option for end-stage grade 3 BPD. As in other infants receiving solid organ transplants, long-term issues with co-morbidities and special needs persist into childhood.

Recent trends in incidence, survival and treatment of multiple myeloma in Finland – a nationwide cohort study

This study aimed to determine the incidence and prevalence of multiple myeloma (MM) in Finland in 2015–2019, to characterize adult patients newly diagnosed with MM, and to follow-up their overall survival (OS) and treatment patterns until the end of 2020. We sourced the data on inpatient and outpatient diagnoses, outpatient medication use, and date of death from comprehensive, nationwide registers. We identified 2037 incident patients with MM in 2015–2019. On average, the annual crude incidence was 8.8 and the age-standardized incidence (World Standard Population) was 3.3 per 100,000. The crude prevalence at the end of 2019 was 32.7 cases per 100,000 inhabitants ≥ 18 years of age. Median age of the patients at first diagnosis (index date) was 71 years, and 48% were female, the median follow-up being 2.4 years. The median OS was estimated at 4.5 years. The proportion of the patients receiving autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) within one year since the index date was 24%, with little variation across study years. Conversely, the proportion of all patients receiving lenalidomide within one year since the index date increased from 27 to 48% overall, and from 39 to 81% among ASCT recipients. The estimated median relapse-free survival after ASCT was 2.9 years. Information on in-hospital MM medication administrations was available for a subset of the study cohort. In this subset, 85.8% of the patients received immunomodulatory drugs and/or proteasome inhibitors within the first year after the index date.

Recovery of left ventricular ejection fraction in Takotsubo Syndrome

Abstract Introduction Takotsubo Syndrome (TTS) is a condition of transient left ventricular dysfunction that is typically triggered by emotional or physical stress. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) recovery in TTS occurs over a wide-range interval, varying from days to weeks. Purpose Our purpose was to access the prognostic impact of delayed recovery of LVEF in patients with TTS. Methods We performed a retrospective analysis of patients admitted in a single centre between 2008 and 2022 with the diagnosis of TTS, with a LVEF &amp;lt;50% at admission. Patients were divided into two groups: Group A- patients with the recovery of ejection fraction during hospitalization (LV EF ≥ 50% at the pre-discharge echocardiogram) and Group B- patients that had a delay in recovery, with LV EF &amp;lt;50% at the pre-discharge echocardiogram. Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACCE) included heart failure hospitalization, cardiovascular mortality, stroke and TTS recurrence. Results We included 63 pts, 88,9% females, mean age of 69,38 ±12,5 years. Group A included 27 pts, with a median LV EF of 37% (IQR 33-41) and group B included 36 pts with a median LV EF of 36% (IQR 33-38,8), with no statistically significant difference between the two groups (p= 0,347). The median pre-discharge LV EF was 60,0% (IQR 56-65,6) in group A and 42,0% (IQR 37-47) in group B (p&amp;lt;0,005). The hospitalization length (HL)was similar between the two groups (mean HL of 7,9 ±7,8 in group A versus 8,1 ±8,4 days in group B, p= 0,93). The two groups were similar in terms of basal characteristics, with more prevalence of psychiatric disease in group A (13,9% vs 33,3%, p= 0,066). We found no statistically differences in clinical presentation and evolution during hospitalization (Killip class, cardiogenic shock, ventricular arrhythmias) and in the rates of concomitant coronary artery disease (14,8% group A versus 26,5% group B, p= 0,270). Also, the in-hospital medication and at discharge (Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, beta blockers, spironolactone and aspirin) were identical between the two groups. There was a tendency for more prescription of anticoagulants at discharge in group B (45,7% versus 22,2%, p = 0,055). During a median follow-up of 41,0 months (IQR 14,0-54,5), group B had a higher rate of MACCE (34,4% versus 20,0%, log rank p= 0,033). In a multivariate analysis, after adjusting for possible confounders, delayed recovery of LV EF was an independent predictor of MACCE with a HR 6,1 (95% CI: 1,50-24,9, p= 0,012) (Fig.1). Conclusions In this population, delayed recovery of LV EF in TTS was an independent predictor of major adverse cardiovascular events. These findings suggest that this population should be targeted in clinical trials to investigate possible interventions and these patients should have a closer follow-up.

Beneficial Effects of Angiotensin II Receptor Blockers on Mortality in Patients with COVID-19: A Retrospective Study from 2019 to 2020 in China.

The COVID-19 pandemic has become a serious global public health problem. Although the use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin II receptor type 1 blockers (ARBs) has been recommended in patients with COVID-19 and cardiovascular diseases (CVDs), according to the results of some small-sample retrospective analyses, there remains a lack of sufficient evidence to validate their efficacy. This multicenter retrospective study investigated whether ACEI/ARB administration was beneficial in patients with COVID-19 and CVDs. A total of 11,231 patients with confirmed COVID-19 and CVDs, from 138 hospitals in Hubei Province, were included in this multicenter retrospective study. We compared the clinical characteristics and outcomes between the ARB and non-ARB groups and analyzed the risk factors for in-hospital death using univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses and Kaplan-Meier curves. In the multivariate Cox regression model, after adjusting for age, gender, comorbidities, and in-hospital medications, ARB use was associated with lower all-cause mortality (adjusted HR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.38-0.73; P < 0.001). After propensity score-matched analysis, the adjusted HR for the use of ARB associated with all-cause mortality was 0.62 (95% CI, 0.40-0.88; P = 0.02). Further subgroup analyses found that the adjusted HRs for the use of ARB associated with all-cause mortality were 0.52 (95% CI, 0.30-0.89; P = 0.016), 0.37 (95% CI, 0.21-0.64; P < 0.001), 0.42 (95% CI, 0.28-0.64; P < 0.001), and 0.55 (95% CI, 0.37-0.84; P = 0.005) in patients with heart failure, diabetes, and hypercholesterolemia, and severe COVID-19, respectively. ARB administration was significantly associated with a lower risk of all-cause mortality in patients with COVID-19 and CVDs. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05615792. https://www. gov/ct2/show/NCT05615792.

Associations between early in-hospital medications and the development of delirium in patients with stroke

ObjectivesPatients hospitalized with stroke develop delirium at higher rates than general hospitalized patients. While several medications are associated with existing delirium, it is unknown whether early medication exposures are associated with subsequent delirium in patients with stroke. Additionally, it is unknown whether delirium identification is associated with changes in the prescription of these medications. Materials and methodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients admitted to a comprehensive stroke center, who were assessed for delirium by trained nursing staff during clinical care. We analyzed exposures to multiple medication classes in the first 48 h of admission, and compared them between patients who developed delirium >48 hours after admission and those who never developed delirium. Statistical analysis was performed using univariate testing. Multivariable logistic regression was used further to evaluate the significance of univariately significant medications, while controlling for clinical confounders. Results1671 unique patients were included in the cohort, of whom 464 (27.8%) developed delirium >48 hours after admission. Delirium was associated with prior exposure to antipsychotics, sedatives, opiates, and antimicrobials. Antipsychotics, sedatives, and antimicrobials remained significantly associated with delirium even after accounting for several clinical covariates. Usage of these medications decreased in the 48 hours following delirium identification, except for atypical antipsychotics, whose use increased. Other medication classes such as steroids, benzodiazepines, and sleep aids were not initially associated with subsequent delirium, but prescription patterns still changed after delirium identification. ConclusionsEarly exposure to multiple medication classes is associated with the subsequent development of delirium in patients with stroke. Additionally, prescription patterns changed following delirium identification, suggesting that some of the associated medication classes may represent modifiable targets for future delirium prevention strategies, although future study is needed.

Clinical outcome of established diagnostic and treatment modalities of COVID-19-associated myocarditis: a systematic review.

This systemic review provides the most recent overview of myocarditis caused by COVID-19, including clinical manifestations, diagnostic techniques, available treatments, and outcomes. The PubMed, Google Scholar, and ScienceDirect servers were used to conduct a systematic search in compliance with the PRISMA guidelines. Boolean search terms included "(COVID-19)" OR "(COVID19)" OR "(COVID-19 VIRUS INFECTION)" AND "(MYOCARDITIS)". The results were tabulated and analyzed. A total of 32 studies, including 26 case reports and 6 case series, were included in the final analysis, and 38 cases of COVID-19-associated myocarditis were analyzed. Middle-aged men constituted the most affected population (60.52%). Dyspnoea (63.15%), chest pain or discomfort (44.73%), and fever (42.10%) were the prevalent presentations. ST-segment abnormalities were reported in 48.38% of cases on electrocardiography testing. Leucocytic infiltration (60%) was the frequent finding obtained on endomyocardial biopsy. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging yielded myocardial oedema (63.63%), and late gadolinium enhancement (54.54%) as the most common findings. Reduced ejection fraction (75%) was the frequent result obtained on echocardiography. Corticosteroids (76.31%) and immunomodulators (42.10%) were the well-established in-hospital medications. Veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (35%) was the most common intervention used to support the treatment. The frequent in-hospital complications were cardiogenic shock (30.76%), followed by pneumonia (23.07%). The mortality rate was 7.9%. Early detection and timely management of myocarditis are essential to reduce the risk of developing further complications. It is crucial to emphasize the need to evaluate COVID-19 as a possible cause of myocarditis in populations that are young and healthy to avoid fatal consequences.

Validating an approach to overcome the immeasurable time bias in cohort studies: a real-world example and Monte Carlo simulation study.

Immeasurable time bias arises from the lack of in-hospital medication information. It has been suggested that time-varying adjustment for hospitalization may minimize this potential bias. However, whereas we examined this issue in one case study, there remains a need to assess the validity of this approach in other settings. Using a Monte Carlo simulation, we generated synthetic immeasurable time-varying hospitalization-related factors of duration, frequency and timing. Nine scenarios were created by combining three frequency scenarios and three duration scenarios, where the empirical cohort distribution of hospitalization was used to simulate the 'timing'. We used Korea's healthcare database and a case example of β-blocker use and mortality among patients with heart failure. We estimated the gold-standard hazard ratio (HR) with 95% CI using inpatient and outpatient drug data, and that of the pseudo-outpatient setting using outpatient data only. We assessed the validity of adjusting for time-varying hospitalization in nine different scenarios, using relative bias, confidence limit ratio (CLR) and mean squared error (MSE) compared with the empirical gold-standard estimate across bootstrap resamples. With the real-world gold standard (HR 0.73; 95% CI 0.67-0.80) as the reference estimate, adjusting for time-varying hospitalization (0.71; 0.63-0.80) effectively reduced the immeasurable time bias and had the following performance metrics across the nine scenarios: relative bias (range: -7.08% to 0.61%), CLR (1.28 to 1.36) and MSE (0.0005 to 0.0031). The approach of adjusting for time-varying hospitalization consistently reduced the immeasurable time bias in Monte Carlo simulated data.

Do sociodemographic and clinical factors affect the selection of initial antidepressant treatment for depression in older adults? Results from a nationwide descriptive study in Denmark

BackgroundThe choice of antidepressants for initial pharmacological treatment of depression in older adults and associated patients' characteristics are understudied. We aimed to describe the first selected antidepressant (first-choice) for depression in older adults (≥65 years) and whether patients' sociodemographic and clinical characteristics influence selecting an alternative first-choice (any other antidepressant than the nationally recommended first-choice sertraline) in Denmark. MethodsRegister-based cross-sectional study including all older adults who redeemed their first antidepressant prescription for depression at community pharmacies in Denmark in 2015–2019. We analyzed the effect of patients' characteristics on the first-choice antidepressant selection using multinomial logistic regression. ResultsAmong 34,337 older adults with a first antidepressant-prescription, over two-thirds filled alternative first-choice antidepressants than sertraline (28.9 %): escitalopram or citalopram (30.3 %) or mirtazapine (34.4 %). Socially disadvantaged older adults (e.g., with short educational attainment, being single, or of non-western ethnicity) and clinically vulnerable older adults (e.g., having somatic diagnoses and hospital contacts) were more likely to use alternative first-choice antidepressants. LimitationsInformation on prescribers and in-hospital medications was not included in this study. ConclusionsFurther investigation of the first antidepressant selection and its impact on depression treatment outcomes in older adults is necessary. Moreover, for older patients, national guidelines on depression treatment should be more specific. Article summaryAntidepressant selection for initial pharmacological treatment of depression in older adults can be difficult due to comorbidity, polypharmacy, and age-related changes in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. Real-world evidence/knowledge on first-choice antidepressant selection and associated user characteristics are rare. This Danish register-based cross-sectional study found over two-thirds of older adults filled alternative antidepressants (primarily escitalopram/citalopram or mirtazapine) than nationally recommended first-choice sertraline for depression treatment and identified wide-ranging sociodemographic and clinical factors influencing the first antidepressant selection.

Effect of Perioperative Oral Vitamin C Supplementation on In-Hospital Postoperative Medication Costs for Cardiac Surgery Patients: A Prospective, Single-Centre, Randomised Clinical Trial.

Due to its antioxidant properties, vitamin C might be a promising and effective strategy for preventing postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) after cardiac surgery. This study was aimed at evaluating whether vitamin C supplementation is effective in reducing the cost of in-hospital postoperative medication used for patients undergoing coronary artery bypass (CABG) or valve surgery (±CABG). The primary goal of this study was to evaluate the impact of perioperative vitamin C supplementation in patients undergoing cardiac surgery on in-hospital postoperative medication costs, while secondary endpoints were the effects on length of stay (LOS) in both the intensive care unit (ICU) and the hospital, and the incidence of POAF. From November 2018 to January 2021, 253 patients planned for CABG or valve surgery (±CABG) in AZ Maria Middelares, Ghent, Belgium, and who met the inclusion criteria (≥18 years of age, all having cardiac sinus rhythm, and who provided written informed consent) were randomised into a placebo group or vitamin C group. The medication was administered orally (1g twice daily), starting from 5 days preoperatively until 10 days postoperatively. The medication used, LOS in the hospital/ICU, and development of clinically relevant POAF in the ICU were registered. Mean medication costs were €264.6±98.1 for patients in the vitamin C group and €294.9±267.3 for patients in the placebo group. When stratifying according to the type of surgery (CABG or valve surgery [±CABG]), these costs did not significantly differ. There was no significant difference in LOS or the incidence of clinically relevant POAF. Our data did not identify any short-term financial impact on postoperative medication costs after oral perioperative vitamin C supplementation (1g twice daily) for patients undergoing a CABG procedure or valve surgery (±CABG). No effect was found on the LOS or the incidence of clinically relevant POAF. Potential effects in the longer term, after intravenous administration of vitamin C or in other types of (cardiac) surgery, are still to be investigated. NCT03592680.

Effectiveness of Remdesivir Treatment Protocols Among Patients Hospitalized with COVID-19: A Target Trial Emulation.

Remdesivir is recommended for certain hospitalized patients with COVID-19. However, these recommendations are based on evidence from small randomized trials, early observational studies, or expert opinion. Further investigation is needed to better inform treatment guidelines with regard to the effectiveness of remdesivir among these patients. We emulated a randomized target trial using chargemaster data from 333 US hospitals from 1 May 2020 to 31 December 2021. We compared three treatment protocols: remdesivir within 2 days of hospital admission, no remdesivir within the first 2 days of admission, and no remdesivir ever. We used baseline comorbidities recorded from encounters up to 12 months before admission and identified the use of in-hospital medications, procedures, and oxygen supplementation from charges. We estimated the cumulative incidence of mortality or mechanical ventilation/extracorporeal membrane oxygenation with an inverse probability of censoring weighted estimator. We conducted analyses in the total population as well as in subgroups stratified by level of oxygen supplementation. A total of 274,319 adult patients met the eligibility criteria for the study. Thirty-day in-hospital mortality risk differences for patients adhering to the early remdesivir protocol were -3.1% (95% confidence interval = -3.5%, -2.7%) compared to no early remdesivir and -3.7% (95% confidence interval -4.2%, -3.2%) compared to never remdesivir, with the strongest effect in patients needing high-flow oxygen. For mechanical ventilation/extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, risk differences were minimal. We estimate that, among hospitalized patients with COVID-19, remdesivir treatment within 2 days of admission reduced 30-day in-hospital mortality, particularly for patients receiving supplemental oxygen on the day of admission.

Prognostic comparison of COVID-19 outpatients and inpatients treated with Remdesivr: A retrospective cohort study.

Since the late COVID-19, many countries have faced various surges and peaks within the number of infected. Iran was one of the countries that faced many surges and peaks within these years and faced many inadequacies and shortages of resources and hospital beds. Hence the healthcare system started using in-hospital medication such as Remdesivir in outpatients to reduce the load of patients admitted to the hospital. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the reported signs, symptoms, and outcomes of COVID-infected hospitalized and out-patients receiving Remdesivir. In this retrospective cohort study, 214 patients (121 outpatient and 93 hospitalized) with moderate levels of Covid infection between October 2021 and February 2022 were studied. Both groups were treated with 200mg of Remdesivir, followed by 100 mg daily intravenous injections for five days; signs and symptoms, such as pain, shortness of breath, cough, fever and etc., of patients at the initiation and the end of treatment were recorded. Moreover, the patients' blood oxygen saturation was assessed two to three times a day, and the mean of the recorded measures was considered as the daily oxygen saturation. The outpatient group had to visit the hospital daily for treatment and assessment. At the treatment's end, mortality rates, disease signs, and symptoms alleviations were compared between the groups. The outpatient and hospitalized group's mean age was 40.30 ± 12.25 and 37.70 ± 12.00 years, and 51.2% and 55.9% were males, respectively. There was no statistical difference between baseline and clinical characteristics in the outpatients and hospitalized groups. After adjusting for oxygen saturation at baseline and gender in the multivariable Cox regression analysis, the risk of death did not statistically differ between the hospitalized and outpatient group (hazard ratio: 0.99, 95% confidence interval: 0.39-2.50)) at the end of the study. Based on the results of this study, the outcome, signs, and symptoms of inpatient and outpatient Remdesivir treatment groups did not differ significantly. Hence in COVID-19 surges where we have limitations in admitting patients, outpatient Remdesivir treatment for those without any underlying diseases can be a proper management method.

Treatment and outcome of patients with acute myocardial infarction and chronic lung disease: insights from the nationwide AMIS Plus registry

Abstract Introduction Little is known about patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and chronic lung disease (CLD). The aim of our study was to analyze risk factors, treatment, and outcome of AMI patients with CLD over the last 20 years using the nationwide AMIS Plus registry. Methods All AMI patients enrolled in the AMIS Plus registry with data on CLD between January 2002 and December 2021 were included. Chronic lung disease was determined according to the definition used in the Charlson Comorbidity Index. Data on baseline characteristics, regular medication, immediate therapy within 24 hours, in-hospital interventions and treatments, in-hospital outcome, complications and discharge medication were analyzed using descriptive statistics and logistic regression. Results Among 53,680 AMI patients, 5.8% had a CLD. The CLD group included 26.6% female and 73.4% male patients. Gender distribution was similar in patients with and without CLD. Patients with CLD were significantly older (71.2 vs. 65.8 y; p&amp;lt;0.001), more frequently diagnosed with NSTEMI, had more comorbidities and were less frequently never smokers (17.4% vs. 35.3%; p&amp;lt;0.001) compared to patients without CLD. In addition, CLD patients were less likely to receive aspirin, P2Y12 inhibitors, beta-blockers, ACE inhibitors and statins (all p&amp;lt;0.001), and were also less likely to undergo percutaneous coronary interventions (68.7% vs. 82.5%; p&amp;lt;0.001). Median length of stay was 2 days longer for CLD patients. Patients with CLD had more major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events in-hospital (10.3% vs. 5.9%; p&amp;lt;0.001) and higher crude in-hospital mortality (8.3% vs. 4.7%; p&amp;lt;0.001). However, multivariable regression analysis showed that CLD was not an independent predictor for in-hospital mortality (OR 1.19 (95% CI 0.98–1.45), p=0.081). Conclusion Patients with CLD were less likely to receive evidence-based medicine and had a worse in-hospital outcome compared to those without CLD. However, after adjustment, CLD was not an independent predictor of in-hospital mortality. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: Private company. Main funding source(s): AstraZeneca AG, Biotronik (Schweiz) AG

A stewardship program to facilitate anticholinergic and sedative medication deprescribing using the drug burden index in electronic medical records.

The drug burden index (DBI) measures a person's total exposure to anticholinergic and sedative medications, which are commonly associated with harm. Through incorporating the DBI in electronic medical records (eMR) and implementing a DBI stewardship program, we aimed to determine (i) uptake of the steward's recommendations to deprescribe anticholinergic and/or sedative drugs by the medical team and (ii) whether accepted recommendations were actioned in hospital or recommended for follow-up by the General Practitioner post-discharge. A single-arm, non-randomised feasibility study was performed at an Australian tertiary referral metropolitan hospital. The stewardship pharmacist reviewed eMRs of patients aged ≥75 years with DBI scores > 0, during admission. The steward identified and discussed potential opportunities to deprescribe anticholinergic and/or sedative medications with the medical registrars. Amongst 256 patients reviewed, the steward made 170 recommendations for 117 patients. Registrars agreed with 141 recommendations (82.9%) for 95 patients (81.2%), and actioned 115 deprescribing recommendations for 80 patients, most commonly for antidepressants and opioids. The 115 actioned recommendations resulted in 125 changes, with 44 changes to the inpatient drug chart and 81 additional changes recommended post-discharge in the discharge summary. Opportunities exist for deprescribing anticholinergic and sedative medications in older inpatients and a DBI stewardship program may help implement these. It is important to capture different outcomes of deprescribing interventions, including in-hospital medication changes, recommendations in the Discharge Summary, sustainability of deprescribing and clinical outcomes.

Application of intervention mapping to develop and evaluate a pharmaceutical discharge letter to improve information transfer between hospital and community pharmacists.

Insufficient information transfer is a major barrier in the transition from hospital to home. This study describes the systematic development and evaluation of an intervention to improve medication information transfer between hospital and community pharmacists. To develop and evaluate an intervention to improve the medication information transfer between hospital and community pharmacists based on patients', community and hospital pharmacists' needs. The intervention development and evaluation was guided by the six-step Intervention Mapping (IM) approach: (1) needs assessment to identify determinants of the problem, with a scoping review and focus groups with patients and healthcare providers, (2) formulation of intervention objectives with an expert group, (3) inventory of communication models to design the intervention, (4) using literature review and qualitative research with pharmacists and patients to develop the intervention (5) pilot-testing of the intervention in two hospitals, and (6) a qualitative evaluation of the intervention as part of a multicenter before-after study with hospital and community pharmacists. Barriers in the information transfer are mainly time and content related. The intervention was designed to target a complete, accurate and timely medication information transfer between hospital and community pharmacists. A pharmaceutical discharge letter was developed to improve medication information transfer. Hospital and community pharmacists were positive about the usability, content, and comprehensiveness of the pharmaceutical discharge letter, which gave community pharmacists sufficient knowledge about in-hospital medication changes. However, hospital pharmacists reported that it was time-consuming to draft the discharge letter and not always feasible to send it on time. The intervention showed that pharmacists are positive about the usability, content and comprehensiveness. This study developed an intervention systematically to improve medication information transfer, consisting of a discharge letter to be used by hospital and community pharmacists supporting continuity of care.