In-contact Chickens Research Articles

Different Outcomes of Chicken Infection with UK-Origin H5N1-2020 and H5N8-2020 High-Pathogenicity Avian Influenza Viruses (Clade 2.3.4.4b).

Clade 2.3.4.4 H5Nx highly pathogenic avian influenza viruses (HPAIVs) of the "goose/Guangdong" lineage have caused a series of European epizootics since 2014. During autumn/winter 2020-2021, several H5Nx subtypes were detected in the UK, with H5N8 being the dominant subtype in wild birds and poultry. Despite the greater subtype diversity (due to viral neuraminidase gene reassortment) reported in wild birds, only H5N8 and H5N1 subtypes caused clade 2.3.4.4 UK HPAIV poultry outbreaks during this period. The direct inoculation of layer chickens showed that H5N8-2020 was more infectious than H5N1-2020, which supported the European H5N8 dominance during that season. However, the mean death time was longer for H5N8-2020 (3.42 days) than for H5N1-2020 (2.17 days). Transmission from directly infected to naive in-contact chickens was inefficient for both subtypes. Histological lesions, the tissue dissemination of viral antigen, and nucleic acid were more extensive and abundant and accumulated more rapidly for H5N1-2020 compared with H5N8-2020. Although inefficient, H5N1-2020 transmission was faster, with its greater virulence indicating that this subtype posed a major concern, as subsequently shown during H5N1 dominance of the clade 2.3.4.4 epizootic since autumn 2021. An evaluation of these in vivo viral characteristics is key to understanding the continuing poultry threats posed by clade 2.3.4.4 H5Nx HPAIVs.

Pathogenicity of H5N8 avian influenza virus in chickens and in duck breeds and the role of MX1 and IFN-α in infection outcome and transmission to contact birds

This study examined the pathogenicity, immunogenicity, and transmission potential of the H5N8 HPAI clade 2.3.4.4b virus in three breeds of ducks and in broiler chickens. Chickens, Muscovy, Pekin, and Mallard ducks (n = 10) received a dose of 6 log10 EID50 of HPAIV H5N8 directly. Nine contact chickens were introduced to each group on the day of infection. All infected chickens died, with MDT of 7.6 days. Muscovy and Pekin ducks died by 11.1% and 10%, respectively, with MDTs of 7 and 6 days. No Mallards died but showed more severe clinical disease than Pekin ducks. Mallards had the highest MX1 gene expression in the lung and spleen and IFN-α in the spleen. MX1 expression levels were lower in the spleen and lung of Pekin ducks, in the spleen of chickens and in the lung of Muscovy ducks than in noninfected controls. However, viral shedding was higher in ducks than in chickens and was highest in Mallards. 66.7% of chickens placed in contact with infected chickens died and 77.8% of in-contact chickens to infected three duck breeds died. In conclusion, there was a diversity in sensitivity and immunogenicity for HPAIV H5N8 among duck breeds, resulting in diverse infection outcomes and transmissibility to contacts. This study provides duck/chicken interface models for HPAIV transmission to poultry.

Virulence factors of Mycoplasma synoviae: Three genes influencing colonization, immunogenicity, and transmissibility.

Infections caused by Mycoplasma synoviae are major welfare and economic concerns in poultry industries worldwide. These infections cause chronic respiratory disease and/or synovitis in chickens and turkeys leading to reduced production and increased mortality rates. The live attenuated vaccine strain MS-H (Vaxsafe® MS), commonly used for protection against M. synoviae infection in many countries, contains 32 single nucleotide variations compared to its wildtype parent strain, 86079/7NS. Genomic analysis of vaccine strains reisolated from flocks following the administration of MS-H has identified reversions to the original 86079/7NS sequence in the obgE, oppF and gapdh genes. Here, three MS-H field reisolates containing the 86079/7NS genotype in obgE (AS2), obgE and oppF (AB1), and obgE, oppF and gapdh (TS4), as well as the vaccine MS-H and the parental strain 86079/7NS were experimentally inoculated to chickens. The strains were assessed for their ability to infect and elicit immune responses in the recipient chickens, as well as in naïve in-contact chickens. Despite the loss of temperature sensitivity phenotype and colonization of the reisolates in the lower respiratory tract, there was no significant differences detected in the microscopic mucosal thickness of the middle or lower trachea of the inoculated chickens. Concurrent reversions in ObgE, OppF and GAPDH proteins were associated with higher gross air sac lesion scores and increased microscopic upper-tracheal mucosal thickness in chickens directly inoculated with the reisolates following intratracheal administration of a virulent strain of infectious bronchitis virus. The gross air sac lesions of the chickens in-contact with those inoculated with reisolates were not significantly different to those of chickens in-contact with MS-H inoculated chickens, suggesting that horizontal transmission of the reisolates in the poultry flock will not lead to higher pathogenicity or clinical signs. These results suggest a significant role of GAPDH and/or cumulative effect of ObgE, OppF and GAPDH on M. synoviae pathogenicity. Future experiments will be required to investigate the effect of single mutations in gapdh or oppF gene on pathogenicity of M. synoviae.

Patterns of Avian Influenza A (H5) and A (H9) virus infection in backyard, commercial broiler and layer chicken farms in Bangladesh.

In order to control Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza (HPAI) H5N1 and Low Pathogenic Avian Influenza (LPAI) H9N2 virus spread in endemically infected countries, a detailed understanding of infection patterns is required. We conducted cross-sectional studies in Bangladesh in 2016 and 2017, on 144 backyard, 106 broiler and 113 layer chicken farms. Although all sampled birds were negative for H5 virus by RT-PCR, H5 antibodies were detected in unvaccinated birds on all three farming systems. Higher H5 antibody prevalence was observed in ducks raised on backyard farms, 14.2% (95% CI: 10.0%-19.8%), compared to in-contact backyard chickens, 4.2% (95% CI: 2.8%-6.1%). The H5 antibody prevalence was lower in broiler chickens, 1.5% (95% CI: 0.9%-2.5%), compared to layer chickens, 7.8% (95% CI: 6.1%-9.8%). H9 viruses were detected by RT-PCR in 0.5% (95% CI: 0.2%-1.3%) and 0.6% (95% CI: 0.3%-1.5%) of broilers and layers, respectively, and in 0.2% (95% CI: 0.0%-1.2%) of backyard chickens. Backyard chickens and ducks showed similar H9 antibody prevalence, 16.0% (95% CI: 13.2%-19.2%) and 15.7% (95% CI: 11.3%-21.4%), which was higher compared to layers, 5.8% (95% CI: 4.3%-7.6%), and broilers, 1.5% (95% CI: 0.9%-2.5%). Over the course of a production cycle, H5 and H9 antibody prevalence increased with the age of backyard and layer chickens. Usually, multiple ducks within a flock were H5 antibody positive, in contrast to backyard chickens, broilers and layers where only individual birds within flocks developed H5 antibodies. Our findings highlight low virus circulation in healthy chickens of all production systems in Bangladesh, which is in contrast to high virus circulation reported from live bird markets. Data generated in this project can be used to adopt risk-based surveillance approaches in different chicken production systems in Bangladesh and to inform mathematical models exploring HPAI infection dynamics in poultry from the source of production.

Muscovy ducks infected with velogenic Newcastle disease virus (genotype VIId) act as carriers to infect in-contact chickens

This work was designed to study the dynamics of transmission of Newcastle disease virus (NDV), genotype VIId, from Muscovy ducks (Cariana moscata) infected either by intramuscular (IM) or intranasal (IN) inoculation, to in-contact broiler chickens (Gallus gallus). IM-infected Muscovy ducks (G1d) exhibited only 5% mortality, and the concentration of virus shed from the cloaca was greater and for longer period than virus shed from the trachea. In contrast, IN-infected ducks (G2d) exhibited no mortality, and virus shedding from the trachea was higher than that from the cloaca starting from 4 days post infection (dpi) and continued up to 16 dpi, while in IM-infected ducks (G1d), tracheal shedding stopped at 11 dpi. Chickens in contact with IM-infected and IN-infected ducks, G1c and G2c, respectively, not only developed severe clinical symptoms and death (80% and 20% mortality, respectively), but also shed the virus at higher concentrations than infected ducks. G1c chickens had higher viral shedding titers in both the trachea and cloaca than G2c chickens until 11 dpi. All broiler chickens infected by IM route (G3c) died, while the IN route of infection resulted in lower mortality (70%) in G4c. Generally, all IM-infected birds produced an earlier and higher level of NDV hemagglutination inhibition (HI) antibody titer, along with higher rates and shorter periods of viral shedding than those infected by the intranasal route. Our conclusion is that Muscovy ducks are efficient carriers of NDV-genotype VIId and transmit the virus to contact chickens.

Replication-independent reduction in the number and diversity of recombinant progeny viruses in chickens vaccinated with an attenuated infectious laryngotracheitis vaccine

Recombination is closely linked with virus replication and is an important mechanism that contributes to genome diversification and evolution in alphaherpesviruses. Infectious laryngotracheitis (ILTV; Gallid alphaherpesvirus 1) is an alphaherpesvirus that causes respiratory disease in poultry. In the past, natural (field) recombination events between different strains of ILTV generated virulent recombinant viruses that have caused severe disease and economic loss in poultry industries. In this study, chickens were vaccinated with attenuated ILTV vaccines to examine the effect of vaccination on viral recombination and diversity following subsequent co-inoculation with two field strains of ILTV. Two of the vaccines (SA2 and A20) prevented ILTV replication in the trachea after challenge, but the level of viral replication after co-infection in birds that received the Serva ILTV vaccine strain did not differ from that of the mock-vaccinated (control) birds. Even though the levels of viral replication were similar in the two groups, the number of recombinant progeny viruses and the level of viral diversity were significantly lower in the Serva-vaccinated birds than in mock-vaccinated birds. In both the mock-vaccinated and Serva-vaccinated groups, a high proportion of recombinant viruses were detected in naïve in-contact chickens that were housed with the co-inoculated birds. Our results indicate that vaccination can limit the number and diversity of recombinant progeny viruses in a manner that is independent of the level of virus replication. It is possible that immune responses induced by vaccination can select for virus genotypes that replicate well under the pressure of the host immune response.

Viral Kinetics, Shedding Profile, and Transmission of Serotype 1 Marek's Disease Vaccine Rispens/CVI988 in Maternal Antibody-Free Chickens

Probably the most effective current vaccine against Marek's disease is the live Rispens (CVI988) attenuated serotype 1 Marek's disease virus (MDV). It is unknown whether the currently available Rispens vaccines transmit effectively between chickens. To investigate the kinetics and shedding of three commercially available strains of this virus and the extent of lateral transmission, we measured the shedding rate in dander and the viral load in peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBLs) and feather tips over time. Four identical climate-controlled rooms were stocked with a total of 70 specific-pathogen-free chickens for 56 days. In each of three rooms, 10 chickens were vaccinated with one of the commercial vaccines at day old and left in contact with 10 unvaccinated chickens. The fourth room contained 10 unvaccinated control chickens. As determined by MDV-specific quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction of weekly room dust and individual PBLs and feather tip samples, the vaccine virus was shed from the vaccinated chickens in dander from day 7 postvaccination and transmitted effectively from vaccinated to in-contact chickens with a lag period of 2-3 wk. Viral load in PBLs and feather tips peaked at days 7 and 14, respectively, and declined thereafter, whereas viral load in dust increased rapidly to day 21 and then increased gradually thereafter. Antibody titer at day 56 was correlated with earlier measures of MDV load in PBLs but not feather tips or dust. These results show that currently available Rispens CVI988 vaccine virus is shed in significant quantities from vaccinated chickens and transmits effectively between chickens.

Scavenging Ducks and Transmission of Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza, Java, Indonesia

In Java, Indonesia, during March 2007-March 2008, 96 farms with scavenging ducks that were not vaccinated against highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) were monitored bimonthly. Bird-level (prevalence among individual birds) H5 seroprevalence was 2.6% for ducks and 0.5% for chickens in contact with ducks. At least 1 seropositive bird was detected during 19.5% and 2.0% of duck- and chicken-flock visits, respectively. Duck flocks were 12.4x more likely than chicken flocks to have seropositive birds. During 21.4% of farm visits, <or=1 sampled duck was H5 seropositive when all sampled in-contact chickens were seronegative. Subtype H5 virus was detected during 2.5% of duck-flock visits and 1.5% of chicken-flock visits. When deaths from HPAI infection occurred, H5 virus shedding occurred in apparently healthy birds on 68.8% of farms. Of 180 poultry deaths investigated, 43.9% were attributed to H5 virus. These longitudinal study results indicate that ducks are a source of infection for chickens and, potentially, for humans.

Highly pathogenic avian influenza (H5N1) in ducks and in-contact chickens in backyard and smallholder commercial duck farms in Viet Nam

Scavenging ducks are thought to play an important role in the maintenance and transmission of highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) H5N1 virus among domesticated and wild bird populations in South East Asia, but detailed field epidemiological results describing the infection status of domestic ducks and in-contact chickens have not been published. We conducted a longitudinal study, monitoring ducks and in-contact chickens in 80 flocks in the Mekong Delta of Viet Nam with bi-monthly testing from May 2007 until May 2008. Because H5 vaccination campaigns are conducted at regular intervals in poultry flocks in Viet Nam, both unvaccinated sentinel and H5 vaccinates were monitored. On each farm, a total of 10 birds were selected: 7 ducks (4 unvaccinated and 3 vaccinated) and 3 chickens (2 unvaccinated and 1 vaccinated) that were in close contact with the ducks. Blood samples were tested for H5 antibodies using the hemagglutination inhibition test, with H5 antibody titers ≥24 considered to indicate past exposure to H5 field or vaccine virus. Titers of vaccinated birds were analyzed for samples collected more than 3 weeks post-vaccination. Pooled oropharyngeal and cloacal swabs were assessed for H5 viral RNA using real-time PCR. Bird- and flock-level prevalences were estimated accounting for sampling fractions and clustering under the multi-stage sampling design with birds being sampled within flocks within villages in four different provinces.In total, serum and swab samples from 5409 birds-samplings were analyzed. Bird-level seroprevalence was 17.5% (95% CI: 14.1, 20.9) amongst unvaccinated ducks and 10.7% (95% CI: 7.4, 14.4) amongst unvaccinated in-contact chickens. Flock-level seroprevalence (proportion of flock-visits with at least one unvaccinated bird test positive) was 42.6% (95% CI: 38.0, 47.2) for ducks and 19.0% (95% CI: 13.6, 24.4) for chickens. Only 54.3% (95% CI: 39.2, 69.3) of vaccinated ducks and 55.5% (95% CI: 46.8, 64.2) of vaccinated in-contact chickens had H5 antibodies at more than 3 weeks post-vaccination. At about 40% and 48% of flock-visits, less than 50% of sampled vaccinated ducks and chickens, respectively, had positive titers.The flock-level virus prevalence (proportion of flocks with at least one bird positive for H5 virus of the vaccinated and unvaccinated birds tested) was 0.7% (95% CI: 0.0, 2.1). No HPAI outbreaks or mortality suspected to be due to HPAI occurred in study flocks during the observation period. Our results indicate that a substantial proportion of ducks and in-contact chickens were exposed to H5 virus during the study period. In the face of this widespread exposure to H5 virus, and despite only moderate proportions of birds developing positive titers post-vaccination, flocks were not affected by HPAI outbreaks during our study period. The higher bird-level seroprevalence in ducks compared to in-contact chickens may be due to greater durations of antibody persistence in ducks or greater rates of H5 virus exposure. These findings indicate that ducks are potentially an important source of H5 virus for other bird species.

The effect of a live vaccine on the horizontal transmission of Mycoplasma gallisepticum

The effect of a live Mycoplasma gallisepticum vaccine on the horizontal transmission of this Mycoplasma species was quantified in an experimental animal transmission model in specific pathogen free White Layers. Two identical trials were performed, each consisting of two experimental groups and one control group. The experimental groups each consisted of 20 birds 21 weeks of age, which were housed following a pair-wise design. One group was vaccinated twice with a commercially available live attenuated M. gallisepticum vaccine, while the other group was not vaccinated. Each pair of the experimental group consisted of a challenged chicken (10(4) colony-forming units intratracheally) and a susceptible in-contact bird. The control group consisted of 10 twice-vaccinated birds housed in pairs and five individually housed non-vaccinated birds. The infection was monitored by serology, culture and quantitative polymerase chain reaction. The vaccine strain and the challenge strain were distinguished by a specific polymerase chain reaction and by random amplified polymorphic DNA analysis. In both experiments, all non-vaccinated challenged chickens and their in-contact 'partners' became infected with M. gallisepticum. In the vaccinated challenged and corresponding in-contact birds, a total of 19 and 13 chickens, respectively, became infected with M. gallisepticum. Analysis of the M. gallisepticum shedding patterns showed a significant effect of vaccination on the shedding levels of the vaccinated in-contact chickens. Moreover, the Cox Proportional Hazard analysis indicated that the rate of M. gallisepticum transmission from challenged to in-contact birds in the vaccinated group was 0.356 times that of the non-vaccinated group. In addition, the overall estimate of R (the average number of secondary cases infected by one typical infectious case) of the vaccinated group (R = 4.3, 95% confidence interval = 1.6 to 49.9) was significantly lower than that of the non-vaccinated group (R = infinity, 95% confidence interval = 9.9 to infinity). However, the overall estimate of R in the vaccinated group still exceeded 1, which indicates that the effect of the vaccination on the horizontal transmission M. gallisepticum is insufficient to stop its spread under these experimental conditions.

Rapid transmission of the protozoan parasite Histomonas meleagridis in turkeys and specific pathogen free chickens following cloacal infection with a mono-eukaryotic culture

In the present investigation, the pathogenicity and transmission of a mono-eukaryotic culture of Histomonas meleagridis for commercial turkeys and specific pathogen free (SPF) chickens is described for the first time. Two separate trials with the same kind of experimental design were performed, one with commercial turkeys and one with SPF chickens. In each experiment, two different groups were included, which were housed in separate rooms. The first group contained four control birds, whereas the second group consisted of 10 infected and four in-contact birds. The birds were infected via the cloaca at 14 days of age with 380,000 cells of a mono-eukaryotic culture of H. meleagridis consisting of a cloned isolate (Turkey/Austria/2922-66/04). Reisolation of the parasite from turkeys and chickens under experimental conditions was performed for the first time. The infected birds started to excrete the parasite as soon as 2 days post infection. Rapid spread of the parasite to in-contact turkeys and chickens was noticed, based on reisolation of live parasites. Reisolation of the pathogen was impossible from two of the four in-contact SPF chickens at any time, whereas all of the infected turkeys were found positive. Intermittent shedding of the parasite was noticed in infected turkeys and SPF chickens, but the phenomenon was much more severe in the SPF chickens as these birds survived the infection. All of the infected and in-contact turkeys died between days 11 and 14 post infection, whereas no death was recorded in the SPF chickens, which were killed 6 weeks after the infection. Typical lesions were recorded in the caeca and livers of the infected turkeys. In addition, a heavy destruction of the bursa of Fabricius was seen in all of the infected and one of the in-contact turkeys. Altogether, the present investigations are of importance for an understanding of the pathogenicity and transmission of H. meleagridis in poultry.

The effect of vaccination with a bacterin on the horizontal transmission of Mycoplasma gallisepticum

The effect of an inactivated vaccine on the horizontal transmission of Mycoplasma gallisepticum was quantified in a transmission model. Twenty non-vaccinated and 20 vaccinated 23-week-old specific pathogen free hens were housed in pairs, while five individually housed hens acted as a negative control group. Each pair consisted of a challenged chicken (10(4) colony forming units intratracheally) and a non-challenged susceptible contact bird. Infection was monitored by serology, quantitative polymerase chain reaction and culture. All non-vaccinated and vaccinated in-contact chickens became infected with M. gallisepticum. The 95% confidence interval of the reproduction ratio, R (a measure of transmission defined as the average number of secondary cases caused by one infectious individual) was 4.48 to infinity in both groups. However, the logarithm of the area under the curve in the vaccinated group was 0.51 lower (P = 0.02) than in the non-vaccinated group, indicating that there was an effect of vaccination on the levels of potential shedding of M. gallisepticum. Nevertheless, the results of this study indicate that the use of an inactivated M. gallisepticum vaccine will not reduce the horizontal transmission of M. gallisepticum between laying hens.

An experimental model to quantify horizontal transmission of Mycoplasma gallisepticum

Before interventions to control horizontal transmission of Mycoplasma gallisepticum can be tested, a suitable experimental model should be available. Transmission dynamics in a flock can be quantified by two parameters: the average number of secondary cases infected by one typical infectious case (R0) and the number of new infections that occur due to one infectious animal per unit of time (beta). The transmission dynamics of M. gallisepticum have not been studied experimentally, so the aim of this study was to examine the horizontal transmission of M. gallisepticum. The study was carried out using a pairwise design with three different inoculation doses. Every pair consisted of an inoculated chicken and a susceptible in-contact chicken. Five susceptible individually housed chickens were placed in between pairs in order to measure airborne transmission. Infection was detected by serology, quantitative polymerase chain reaction and culture. The inoculated and in-contact chickens were equally infectious and the pairs could be regarded as independent. The R0 was estimated to be greater than 1 (infinity; 95% confidence interval, 4.5 to infinity), the estimated beta was 0.22 per day and there was no significant difference between the different inoculation doses. It was concluded that the animal model as described in this study meets the conditions for the establishment of transmission dynamics of M. gallisepticum and therefore can be used to establish the quantitative effect of intervention measures on horizontal transmission.

Evaluation of an oral newcastle disease vaccine in Thailand

Laboratory chickens were vaccinated against Newcastle disease by feeding them with the avirulent, heat-resistant V4 strain of Newcastle disease virus applied to various grains. In one experiment, chickens receiving vaccine on paddy (unhusked) rice and on cooked white rice at 4 and 6 weeks of age were protected against contact challenge with a viscerotropic, velogenic strain of Newcastle disease virus. The vaccine virus spread to in-contact chickens and these also resisted challenge. In another experiment, chickens receiving the same vaccine on the same grains were not projected. The chickens in the unsuccesful trial were younger, had higher levels of maternal antibody and were kept on wire mesh instead of on solid floors, thereby minimizing transmission of the vaccine virus. Strain V4 was an effective vaccine when given intranasally or in drinking water but V4 vaccine supplied on uncooked white rice and on uncooked broken brown rice was not protective. Oral vaccine delivered on paddy or cooked white rice could provide a practical method of protecting free-range village chickens against Newcastle disease.

The Status of Guinea Fowls (Numida meleagris) in the Epidemiology of Infectious Bursal Disease (IBD) of Poultry in Nigeria

A serological survey for IBD in market guinea fowls gave a total prevalence rate of 44.3% from five different locations in Nigeria. Guinea fowl keets were susceptible to experimental IBD infection and transmitted it to in-contact sentinel chickens. The infected guinea fowl keets showed the typical clinical-pathology and seroconversion for IBD. These results suggest that guinea fowls could play an active part in the epidemiology of IBD.

Serological response of chickens to oral vaccination with newcastle disease virus

Conventional Newcastle disease vaccines are not suitable for application to village chickens in tropical countries of Asia. Trials with food-based vaccines are being initiated and the following experiments were performed to evaluate oral vaccination with Newcastle disease irus. Experimental chickens were vaccinated orally with the avirulent V4 strain of Newcastle disease virus and haemagglutination-inhibition antibody responses were measured. V4 virus was introduced into the crop by tube and total faecal output was collected daily and assayed for Newcastle disease virus. Virus was recovered on Days 5 and 6 after vaccination from most chickesn that had received 10 7.4 and 10 6.4 50% egg-infectious doses (EID 50) of virus. There was no recovery of virus from birds receiving a lower dose of vaccine. Groups of chickens kept in cages with wire floors were given various doses of vaccine into the crop. Higher antibody titres were achieved with higher doses of virus. This dose responsiveness was not observed when various doses of vaccine were presented on food pellets and the groups of chickens were kept on concrete floors. Similar antibody responses were then seen with nominal doses of 10 5.2 and 10 8.2 IED 50 per bird, possibly as a result of excretion and re-ingestion of the vaccine virus. Spread of the vaccine virus was demonstrated when control chickens and chickens receiving 10 7.7 EID 50 of V4 virus On food pellets were housed together on a concrete floor. Similar antibody titres were achieved in both vaccinated and incontact chickens.

Pathogenicity of Australian isolates of haemophilus paragallinarum and haemophilus avium in chickens

Twenty-seven Australian avian Haemophilus isolates were tested for their ability to cause infectious coryza in specific pathogen-free chickens. All 15 isolates, identified as H. paragallinarum, produced infectious coryza, whereas all 12 H. avium isolates were nonpathogenic, but spread to in-contact chickens.

Transmissibility of two avian influenza a viruses (H7 N6) between chickens

Differences were demonstrated in the transmissibility of two strains of avian influenza virus among chickens. One strain, A/duck/Victoria/76 (H7N6) spread quickly and infected all incontact chickens, whereas A/chicken/Victoria/75 (H7N6) spread slowly and failed to infect all incontact chickens. These strains were isolated in the same locality at about the same time in a region where the viruses, and the disease fowl plague, had not been previously recognised.

The effect on the virulence and infectivity ofSalmonella typhimuriumandSalmonella gallinarumof acquiring antibiotic resistance plasmids from organisms that had caused serious outbreaks of disease

Antibiotic resistance plasmids from organisms that had caused serious epidemics, including those responsible for epidemics of chloramphenicol-resistant typhoid fever and dysentery in Central America, were transferred to a strain of Salmonella typhimurium and of Salmonella gallinarum. The virulence and infectivity of these R(+) forms were then compared with the R(-) parent forms in orally inoculated chickens.None of the R(+) forms were more virulent than their R(-) parent forms. The mortality rates they produced were either the same as or less than that of their R(-) parent forms. The mortality rates were not increased by feeding the chickens on diets containing antibiotics against which the plasmids provided resistance.The removal of the plasmids from some R(+) forms of decreased virulence was not accompanied by any alteration in virulence, indicating that they were less virulent mutants of the parent strain that had conjugated preferentially. In other cases their virulence was increased, indicating that the very possession of the plasmid was involved in their decreased virulence. Of four forms of the S. gallinarum strain harbouring the plasmid that had been incriminated in the Central American dysentery outbreak, one was as virulent as the parent R(-) form and the other three were less virulent. Preferential conjugation by an avirulent mutant was responsible for the lack of virulence of one of them but the very possession of the plasmid appeared responsible for the decreased virulence of the other two. The decreased virulence of de-repressed F(+) and I(+) forms of the S. typhimurium strain was increased to that of repressed F(+) form and of the parent form by plasmid removal.Organisms of the R(+) forms of the S. typhimurium strain were not excreted in larger amounts or for longer periods of time by infected chickens than organisms of the R(-) parent form were. Neither did organisms of the R(+) forms of this strain or the S. gallinarum strain spread more rapidly or more extensively from infected chickens to in-contact chickens than organisms of the R(-) parent forms did. When antibiotics against which the infecting R(+) organisms provided resistance were included in the diet of these chickens the R(+) organisms were usually excreted in greater amounts, for longer periods of time and spread more rapidly and more extensively from the infected chickens to the in-contact chickens.

INFECTION STUDIES ON A RETICULOENDOTHELIOSIS VIRUS CONTAMINANT OF A COMMERCIAL MAREK'S DISEASE VACCINE

Reticuloendotheliosis virus (REV) was isolated in cell cultures from commercial Marek's disease (herpesvirus of turkeys) vaccine and re-isolated from the organs of vaccinated chickens. Runting and feathering abnormalities were produced when 1-day-old specific pathogen free chickens were inoculated with REV. Histopathological lesions in infected chickens were hypoplasia of the thymus, bursa and spleen, and inflammation of the proventriculus, kidneys and liver. Serological responses to REV were detected by the indirect immunoflorescence test in chickens directly inoculated with contaminated vaccine, and spread of REV infection to in-contact chickens was demonstrated by histopathological and serological investigations.