Improvement In Median Overall Survival Research Articles

Impact of Adjuvant Chemotherapy on Resected Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasm-Derived Pancreatic Cancer: Results From an International Multicenter Study.

The benefit of adjuvant therapy for intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN)-derived pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains unclear because of severely limited evidence. Although biologically distinct entities, adjuvant therapy practices for IPMN-derived PDAC are largely founded on pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia-derived PDAC. We aimed to evaluate the role of adjuvant chemotherapy in IPMN-derived PDAC. This international multicenter retrospective cohort study (2005-2018) was conceived at the Verona Evidence-Based Medicine meeting. Cox regressions were performed to identify risk-adjusted hazard ratios (HR) associated with overall survival (OS). Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests were employed for survival analysis. Logistic regression was performed to identify factors motivating adjuvant chemotherapy administration. A decision tree was proposed and categorized patients into overtreated, undertreated, and optimally treated cohorts. In 1,031 patients from 16 centers, nodal disease (HR, 2.88, P < .001) and elevated (≥37 to <200 µ/mL, HR, 1.44, P = .006) or markedly elevated (≥200 µ/mL, HR, 2.53, P < .001) carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) were associated with worse OS. Node-positive patients with elevated CA19-9 had an associated 34.4-month improvement in median OS (P = .047) after adjuvant chemotherapy while those with positive nodes and markedly elevated CA19-9 had an associated 12.6-month survival benefit (P < .001). Node-negative patients, regardless of CA19-9, did not have an associated benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy (all P > .05). Based on this model, we observed undertreatment in 18.1% and overtreatment in 61.2% of patients. Factors associated with chemotherapy administration included younger age, R1-margin, poorer differentiation, and nodal disease. Almost half of patients with resected IPMN-derived PDAC may be overtreated or undertreated. In patients with node-negative disease or normal CA19-9, adjuvant chemotherapy is not associated with a survival benefit, whereas those with node-positive disease and elevated CA19-9 have an associated benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy. A decision tree was proposed. Randomized controlled trials are needed for validation.

Real-life nationwide characteristics and outcomes of small cell lung cancer over the last 20 years: Impact of immunotherapy on overall survival in a real-life setting

BackgroundThe KBP studies are real-life nationwide, prospective, multicenter cohort studies of patients diagnosed with primary lung cancer that have been conducted in French non-academic public hospitals each decade since 2000. MethodsPatients were analyzed in three prospective cohorts using the same methodology. In this study, we describe and compare the characteristics and outcomes of patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC), with a focus on treatments in the 2020 cohort. Findings8999 patients with lung cancer were included in the 2020 cohort, of whom 1137 had SCLC. From 2000 to 2010 and 2020, the proportion of patients with SCLC decreased from 16.4 % to 13.5 % and 12.6 % respectively. Between 2000 and 2020, the proportion of women increased from 15.5 % to 35.7 %. 15.4 % of patients with SCLC had limited-stage (LS) disease and 84.6 % of patients had extensive-stage (ES) disease. The 1-year overall survival (OS) rate for all patients with SCLC increased from 34.4 % in 2000 to 38.4 % in 2020. For ES-SCLC, multivariate analysis weighted with “entropy balancing” by including age, sex, performance status, number of metastatic sites, and brain metastases indicated an improvement in median OS from 8.1 months in patients receiving chemotherapy only to 11.1 months in patients receiving chemotherapy plus immunotherapy (HR 0.62, p < 0.001). InterpretationThe proportion with SCLC has decreased over time, but the proportion of women has increased. The 1-year OS rates have improved over 20 years. The KBP-2020 cohort suggests a benefit of immunotherapy on OS in patients with ES-SCLC in the real-life setting.

The landscape of checkpoint inhibitors in oncology

BackgroundImmune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapies have become increasingly popular treatment options for patients with cancer, even for patients in non-metastatic settings. Survival and responses have been reported for individual tumor types, but little is known about these outcomes, collectively. We sought to provide an overview of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in ICI drugs tested in registration trials. MethodsIn a cross-sectional analysis of US FDA oncology ICI drug approvals (2011–2023), we searched for supporting ICI registration trials. We characterized these trials, regarding differences in median OS and PFS between patients in intervention and control arm participants in ICI registration trials; percentage of patients who receive ICI crossover; and whether there is correlation between the percentage of crossover and differences in OS or PFS. ResultsFifty-six (54.4 %) approvals had trials that reported median OS for both intervention and control arms (median difference was 2.8 months; IQR: 2.2 to 5.0 months). Sixty-five (63.1 %) approvals had trials that reported PFS data for both arms (median of 0.9 months; IQR: −0.2 to 3.0 months). Subsequent therapy was common (median=18.9 %) and was significantly correlated with a higher difference in median OS in all studies with reported differences (R2 =0.15; p = 0.001). ConclusionICIs are increasingly used in the treatment of cancer, yet the median OS improvement is modest, and many ICIs have not been tested for OS benefit. OS is the outcome most meaningful for patients, and drug regulation should require better testing and reporting of these data.

Trends in Outcomes After Upfront Autologous Transplant for Multiple Myeloma Over Three Decades

Upfront autologous stem cell transplantation (auto-SCT) remains standard of care for eligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM), although recently its role has been questioned. The aim of the study was to evaluate trends in patient characteristics, treatment, and outcomes of NDMM who underwent upfront auto-SCT over three decades. We conducted a single-center retrospective analysis of patients with NDMM who underwent upfront auto-SCT at MD Anderson Cancer Center between 1988 to 2021. Primary end points were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Patients were grouped by the year of auto-SCT: 1988-2000 (n = 249), 2001-2005 (n = 373), 2006-2010 (n = 568), 2011-2015 (n = 815) and 2016-2021 (n = 1036). High-risk cytogenetic abnormalities were defined as del (17p), t (4;14), t (14;16), and 1q21 gain or amplification by fluorescence in situ hybridization. We included 3041 MM patients in the analysis. Median age at auto-SCT increased from 52 years (1988-2000) to 62 years (2016-2021), as did the incidence of high-risk cytogenetics from 15% to 40% (P < .001). Comorbidity burden, as measured by a Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation-Specific Comorbidity Index (HCT-CI) of >3, increased from 17% (1988-2000) to 28% (2016-2021) (P < .001). Induction regimens evolved from predominantly chemotherapy to immunomodulatory drug (IMiD) and proteasome inhibitor (PI) based regimens, with 74% of patients receiving IMiD-PI triplets in 2016-2021 (39% bortezomib, lenalidomide and dexamethasone (VRD) and 35% carfilzomib, lenalidomide and dexamethasone [KRD]). Response rates prior to auto-SCT steadily increased, with 4% and 10% achieving a ≥CR and ≥VGPR compared to 19% and 65% between 1988-2000 and 2016-2021, respectively. Day 100 response rates post auto-SCT improved from 24% and 49% achieving ≥CR and ≥VGPR between 1988-2000 to 41% and 81% between 2016-2021, respectively. Median PFS improved from 22.3 months between 1988-2000 to 58.6 months between 2016-2021 (HR 0.42, P < .001). Among patients with high-risk cytogenetics, median PFS increased from 13.7 months to 36.8 months (HR 0.32, P < .001). Patients aged ≥65 years also had an improvement in median PFS from 33.6 months between 2001 and 2005 to 52.8 months between 2016-2021 (HR 0.56, P = .001). Median OS improved from 55.1 months between 1988-2000 to not reached (HR 0.41, P < .001). Patients with high-risk cytogenetics had an improvement in median OS from 32.9 months to 66.5 months between 2016-2021 (HR 0.39, P < .001). Day 100 non-relapse mortality from 2001 onwards was ≤1%. Age-adjust rates of second primary malignancies were similar in patients transplanted in different time periods. Despite increasing patient age and comorbidity burden, this large real-world study demonstrated significant improvements in the depth of response and survival outcomes in patients with NDMM undergoing upfront auto-SCT over the past three decades, including those with high-risk disease.

LUNAR-2: Pivotal, randomized, open-label study of tumor treating fields (TTFields, 150 kHz) concomitant with pembrolizumab and platinum based chemotherapy for the treatment of metastatic non-small cell lung cancer.

TPS8665 Background: Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields) are electric fields that disrupt processes critical for cancer cell viability. TTFields are delivered by a noninvasive portable device that has the European CE Mark and FDA approval for glioblastoma and mesothelioma. Preclinical non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) studies demonstrated that TTFields enhance the antitumor immune response, through disruption of mitosis and subsequent induction of immunogenic cell death. The pivotal, phase III LUNAR study (NCT02973789) in metastatic NSCLC progressing on/after platinum-based therapy demonstrated that TTFields with an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) or docetaxel provided a statistically significant and clinically meaningful 3.3-month improvement in median overall survival (OS) vs an ICI or docetaxel alone, with no added systemic toxicities and no clinically significant difference on quality of life between groups. Despite advances in the treatment of NSCLC, survival rates for stage IV disease remain poor and there is a need for effective and tolerable treatments. Methods: LUNAR-2 (NCT06216301) is a pivotal, global, randomized, trial investigating the efficacy and safety of TTFields concomitant with pembrolizumab (P) and platinum-based chemotherapy (C) in patients (pts) with metastatic NSCLC, with a planned enrollment of 734 pts at 134 sites. Pts with NSCLC, radiologically evaluable disease in the thorax, ECOG PS of 0–1, and no prior treatment for metastatic disease are eligible. Pts will be stratified by histology, PD-L1 Tumor Proportion Score (TPS) and prior treatment with immunotherapy. Randomization is 1:1 to TTFields/P+C or P+C alone. Standard doses of P+C will be administered to both arms on day 1 of a 21-day cycle for 4 cycles of induction followed by up to 31 cycles of maintenance with TTFields/P or P alone. TTFields generated by the NovoTTF-200T System, will be delivered to the thorax ≥ 18 h/day until local disease progression per iRECIST. The primary endpoints are OS and progression-free survival (PFS) per RECIST v1.1 as assessed by a blinded independent central review (BICR). Secondary endpoints include OS and PFS according to histology or PD-L1 TPS, objective response rate, duration of response, and disease control rate, all per RECIST v1.1 as assessed by BICR and by investigator, comparing TTFields/P+C vs. P+C alone. Other secondary endpoints include PFS rates at 6, 12, 24 and 36 months per RECIST v1.1 as assessed by BICR, 1-, 2-, and 3-year survival rates and safety. Device Support Specialists will provide technical and lifestyle integration training for pts and caregivers throughout TTFields therapy. Pts usage is tracked by the device and is provided to pts and physicians to facilitate discussions to optimize outcomes by maximizing time on therapy. The trial is currently recruiting. Clinical trial information: NCT06216301 .

Abemaciclib plus a nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor as initial therapy for HR+, HER2− advanced breast cancer: final overall survival results of MONARCH 3

In MONARCH 2, the addition of abemaciclib to fulvestrant significantly improved both progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with HR+, HER2- advanced breast cancer (ABC) with disease progression on prior endocrine therapy (ET). In MONARCH 3, the addition of abemaciclib to a nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor (NSAI) as initial therapy for HR+, HER2- ABC significantly improved PFS. Here, we present the prespecified final OS results for MONARCH 3. MONARCH 3 is a randomized, double-blind, phase 3 study of abemaciclib plus NSAI (anastrozole or letrozole) versus placebo plus NSAI in postmenopausal women with HR+, HER2- ABC without prior systemic therapy in the advanced setting. The primary objective was investigator-assessed PFS; OS was a gated secondary endpoint, and chemotherapy-free survival (CFS) was an exploratory endpoint. A total of 493 women were randomized 2:1 to receive abemaciclib plus NSAI (n = 328) or placebo plus NSAI (n = 165). After a median follow-up of 8.1 years, there were 198 OS events (60.4%) in the abemaciclib arm and 116 (70.3%) in the placebo arm (hazard ratio, 0.804; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.637-1.015; P = 0.0664, non-significant). Median OS was 66.8 versus 53.7 months for abemaciclib versus placebo. In the subgroup with visceral disease (sVD), there were 113 OS events (65.3%) in the abemaciclib arm and 65 (72.2%) in the placebo arm (hazard ratio, 0.758; 95% CI, 0.558-1.030; P = 0.0757, non-significant). Median OS was 63.7 months versus 48.8 months for abemaciclib versus placebo. The previously demonstrated PFS benefit was sustained, and CFS numerically improved with the addition of abemaciclib. No new safety signals were observed. Abemaciclib combined with an NSAI resulted in clinically meaningful improvement in median OS (ITT: 13.1 months; sVD: 14.9 months) in patients with HR+ HER2- ABC; however, statistical significance was not reached.

Abstract GS01-12: MONARCH 3: Final overall survival results of abemaciclib plus a nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor as first-line therapy for HR+, HER2- advanced breast cancer

Abstract Background: Abemaciclib is approved both for high-risk early breast cancer as well as advanced breast cancer (ABC) in the first- and second-line setting. In MONARCH 2, the addition of abemaciclib to fulvestrant significantly improved both progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with HR+, HER2- ABC with disease progression on prior endocrine therapy (ET). In MONARCH 3, the addition of abemaciclib to a nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor (NSAI) significantly improved PFS (HR, 0.540; 95% CI, 0.418-0.698; p=0.000002) as initial therapy in HR+, HER2- ABC. At the last interim OS analysis (~252 events, at 5.8 years follow-up [FU]), a numerically favorable median OS difference (12.6 months) was observed (HR, 0.754; 95% CI, 0.584-0.974; p=0.0301, non-significant [NS]). Here, we present the final OS analysis of MONARCH 3 (NCT02246621). Methods: MONARCH 3 is a randomized, double-blind, Phase 3 study of abemaciclib + NSAI (anastrozole or letrozole) vs placebo + NSAI in postmenopausal women with HR+, HER2- ABC without prior systemic therapy in the advanced setting. OS was a gated secondary endpoint and chemotherapy-free survival (CFS) an exploratory endpoint. Final OS analysis was planned after approximately 315 OS events had occurred in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population with a split alpha between the ITT population and the subgroup with visceral disease (sVD) according to a prespecified graphical testing scheme. Kaplan-Meier method and stratified Cox proportional hazards models were used for time-to-event analyses. All reported p-values are two-sided. Results A total of 493 women were randomized 2:1 to receive abemaciclib + NSAI (n=328) or placebo + NSAI (n=165). After a median FU of 8.1 years, 7% of patients were still receiving treatment in the abemaciclib arm vs 3% in the placebo arm. In the ITT population, 314 OS events were observed (198 deaths among 328 patients [60%] in the abemaciclib arm and 116 among 165 [70%] in the placebo arm; HR, 0.804; 95% CI, 0.637-1.015; p=0.0664, NS). Median OS was 66.8 months in the abemaciclib arm and 53.7 months in the placebo arm, a numerical difference of 13.1 months in the ITT population. In the sVD, 178 events were observed (113 deaths among 173 patients [65%] in the abemaciclib arm and 65 among 90 [72%] in the placebo arm; HR, 0.758; 95% CI, 0.558-1.030; p=0.0757, NS). Median OS was 63.7 months in the abemaciclib arm and 48.8 months in the placebo arm, a numerical difference of 14.9 months in the sVD. Consistent OS differences were observed across prespecified subgroups. PFS benefit was sustained (median 29.0 vs 14.8 months; HR, 0.535; 95% CI, 0.429-0.668; nominal p&amp;lt;0.0001) with substantial difference in 6-year PFS rates (23.3% vs 4.3% for abemaciclib vs placebo). CFS was also improved with abemaciclib vs placebo (median 46.7 vs 30.6 months; HR, 0.693; 95% CI, 0.557-0.863; nominal p=0.0010). No new safety signals were observed with longer term use. Conclusion In patients with HR+, HER2- ABC, abemaciclib in combination with a NSAI resulted in numerically longer OS compared to NSAI alone; however, statistical significance was not reached after a median FU of 8.1 years. The clinically meaningful improvement in median OS (&amp;gt;13 months) combined with the sustained significant improvement in median PFS (&amp;gt;14 months) and substantial extension in median CFS (&amp;gt;16 months) continue to support the use of abemaciclib in combination with NSAI as first-line therapy in ABC. Citation Format: Matthew Goetz, Masakazu Toi, Jens Huober, Joo Hyuk Sohn, Olivier Trédan, Inhae Park, Mario Campone, Shin-Cheh Chen, Luis Manual Manso, Shani Paluch-Shimon, Orit C. Freedman, Valerie Andre, Abhijoy Saha, Gertjan van Hal, Ashwin Shahir, Hiroji Iwata, Stephen RD Johnston, Joyce O'Shaughnessy, Xavier Pivot, Sara Tolaney, Sara Hurvitz, Antonio Llombart. MONARCH 3: Final overall survival results of abemaciclib plus a nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor as first-line therapy for HR+, HER2- advanced breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr GS01-12.

First-line Immunotherapy for Metastatic Merkel Cell Carcinoma: Analysis of Real-world Survival Data and Practice Patterns.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors are a promising new therapy for advanced Merkel Cell Carcinoma (MCC). We investigated real-world utilization and survival outcomes of first-line immunotherapies in a contemporary cohort. Using the National Cancer Database (NCDB), we identified 759 patients with MCC between 2015 and 2020 with stage IV disease and known status of first-line systemic therapy. Univariable and multivariable analyses were used to determine predictors of immunotherapy usage. Overall survival (OS) was compared for patients receiving immunotherapy, chemotherapy, or no systemic therapies. We identified 759 patients meeting our inclusion criteria: 329 patients received immunotherapy, 161 received chemotherapy, and 269 received no systemic therapy. Adjusting for demographic, clinical, and facility factors, high facility volume significantly predicted first-line immunotherapy use (OR 1.99; P =0.017). Median OS was 16.2, 12.3, and 8.7 months, among patients who received immunotherapy, chemotherapy, or no systemic therapy, respectively ( P <0.001). On Cox multivariable survival analysis, first-line immunotherapy treatment (HR=0.79, P =0.041) and treatment at high-volume centers (HR=0.58, P =0.004) were associated with improved OS. Consistent with clinical trial results, first-line immunotherapy associated with improvement in median overall survival for patients with stage IV MCC, significantly outperforming chemotherapy in this real-world cohort. Treatment at high-volume centers associated with first-line immunotherapy utilization suggesting that familiarity with this rare disease is important to achieving optimal outcomes for metastatic MCC.

Isatuximab-pomalidomide-dexamethasone versus pomalidomide-dexamethasone in patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma: final overall survival analysis.

The primary and prespecified updated analyses of ICARIA-MM (clinicaltrial gov. Identifier: NCT02990338) demonstrated improved progression-free survival (PFS) and a benefit in overall survival (OS) was reported with the addition of isatuximab, an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody, to pomalidomide-dexamethasone (Pd) in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. Here, we report the final OS analysis. This multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase III study included patients who had received and failed ≥2 previous therapies, including lenalidomide and a proteasome inhibitor. Between January 10, 2017, and February 2, 2018, 307 patients were randomized (1:1) to isatuximab-pomalidomide-dexamethasone (Isa-Pd; N=154) or Pd (N=153), stratified based on age (<75 vs. ≥75 years) and number of previous lines of therapy (2-3 vs. >3). At data cutoff for the final OS analysis after 220 OS events (January 27, 2022), median follow-up duration was 52.4 months. Median OS was 24.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 20.3-31.3) with Isa-Pd and 17.7 months (95% CI: 14.4- 26.2) with Pd (hazard ratio=0.78; 95% CI: 0.59-1.02; 1-sided P=0.0319). Despite subsequent daratumumab use in the Pd group and its potential benefit on PFS in the first subsequent therapy line, median PFS2 was significantly longer with Isa-Pd versus Pd (17.5 vs. 12.9 months; log-rank 1-sided P=0.0091). In this analysis, Isa-Pd continued to be efficacious and well tolerated after follow-up of approximately 52 months, contributing to a clinically meaningful, 6.9-month improvement in median OS in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.

Real-world (RW) effectiveness of nivolumab plus chemotherapy (NIVO+chemo) in patients (pts) with advanced or metastatic gastric carcinoma, gastroesophageal junction carcinoma, or esophageal adenocarcinoma (GC/GEJC/EAC).

295 Background: In the CheckMate 649 trial, NIVO+chemo demonstrated superior efficacy vs chemo alone in pts with previously untreated, advanced, non-human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 positive GC/GEJC/EAC. Our study was the first to evaluate the RW adoption patterns and effectiveness of NIVO+chemo as a first-line (1L) treatment of advanced GC/GEJC/EAC in the immediate period after NIVO approval in this setting. We report the 18-mo follow-up results. Methods: Pts in the United States ≥ 18 years of age with previously untreated advanced or metastatic GC/GEJC/EAC receiving NIVO+chemo or chemo alone (FOLFOX or CAPEOX) between 04/01/2021 and 12/31/2022 were identified in the Flatiron Health database. Pts were followed from the start of 1L therapy to death, loss of data availability, or the end of data abstraction, whichever occurred first. Results: 528 pts were eligible for the analysis (231 [44%] NIVO+chemo, 297 [56%] chemo). The prevalence of PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS) ≥ 5 before the 1L therapy was 55% for NIVO+chemo and 27% for chemo. Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics were comparable between treatment groups in the overall cohort and the CPS subgroups. Median follow-up (interquartile range) was 6.0 (2.4−9.8) mo for NIVO+chemo and 6.1 (2.5−9.7) mo for chemo. There were 87 (37.7%) deaths in the NIVO+chemo cohort and 138 (46.5%) in the chemo cohort. NIVO+chemo demonstrated superior overall survival (OS) in the overall cohort, with a 12-mo OS rate of 53.3% vs 38.1% for chemo and a 2.6-mo improvement in median OS (12.6 [95% confidence interval (CI), 10.2−17.9] mo vs 10.0 [8.9−11.5] mo, P = 0.047). Univariate Cox regression analysis of OS yielded a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.76 (95% CI, 0.58−1.00; P = 0.048) and multivariate Cox regression yielded an HR of 0.74 (95% CI, 0.56−0.98; P = 0.033) for NIVO+chemo vs chemo. There was also a consistent trend toward OS benefit with NIVO+chemo vs chemo in all CPS subgroups (Table). Multivariate analysis in the CPS ≥ 1 subgroup yielded a HR of 0.51 (95% CI, 0.30−0.89) for NIVO+chemo vs chemo but was not feasible in other subgroups due to sample size. Conclusions: NIVO+chemo showed superior OS vs chemo alone in previously untreated pts with advanced GC/GEJC/EAC in the RW setting. A trend toward OS benefit was also observed in all CPS subgroups, which will be further examined in future analyses with larger samples and longer follow-up. Clinical trial information: NCT02872116 . [Table: see text]

Real-world progression in the survival of de novo Metastatic prostate cancer over the past decade

BackgroundThe impact of evolving treatment strategies for metastatic prostate cancer (mPCa) on real-world survival is not well understood. We analyzed changes in mPCa survival over the past decade and discussed the potential driving factors behind these changes. MethodsOur study involved 43,228 mPCa patients (2004–2020) from the SEER database, divided into 4 diagnostic periods. We used a multivariate Cox proportional hazards model to evaluate diagnostic periods' influence on overall mortality (OM) and prostate cancer-specific mortality (PSM), and calculated relative median survival improvements between adjacent periods. Subgroup analyses based on age and distant metastasis sites were conducted. ResultsPatients diagnosed in 2016 to 2020 experienced significantly reduced mortality risk compared to those in 2004 to 2007 (HR 0.64 for OM, HR 0.62 for CSM, both P < 0.001). The study period witnessed an absolute improvement in median overall survival (OS) and prostate cancer-specific survival (PCSS), 17 months (54.8%) and 25 months (67.6%) respectively. The most rapid relative survival improvement occurred post-2016, with a 29.7% increase in median OS and a 37.8% increase in PCSS compared to 2012 to 2015. There was a significant reduction in mortality risk throughout the study period in both age groups (age <75 and ≥75), but absolute survival gains were smaller in the older group (24 months [68.6%] vs. 8 months [32%] for OS, 36 months [90.0%] vs. 11 months [33.3%] for PCSS), with lower relative survival improvements after 2016 (37.2% vs. 17.9% for OS, 49% vs. 22.2% for PCSS). All metastasis site subgroups (except M1a) exhibited a significant reduction in mortality risk (all P < 0.001). Absolute survival improvements were 58 months (134.9%) for M1a, 16 months (50.0%) for M1b, and 17 months (54.8%) for M1c. ConclusionThe survival of mPCa have significantly improved over the past decade, although the progress is slower in elderly patients. Investigating the underlying reasons for survival differences among various patient profiles can further refine mPCa treatment strategies.

Loss of RAS Mutations in Liquid Biopsies of Patients With Multi-Treated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.

Liquid biopsy (LB) is a non-invasive tool to evaluate the heterogeneity of tumors. Since RAS mutations (RAS-mut) play a major role in resistance to antiepidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors (EGFR) monoclonal antibodies (Mabs), serial monitoring of RAS-mut with LB may be useful to guide treatment. The main aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic value of the loss of RAS-mut (NeoRAS-wt) in LB, during the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). A retrospective study was conducted on patients with mCRC between January 2018 and December 2021. RAS-mut were examined in tissue biopsy, at mCRC diagnosis, and with LB, during treatment. Thirty-nine patients with RAS-mut mCRC were studied. LB was performed after a median of 3 lines (0-7) of systemic treatment including anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) Mabs. NeoRAS-wt was detected in 13 patients (33.3%); 9 (69.2%) of them received further treatment with anti-EGFR Mabs with a disease control rate of 44.4%. Median overall survival (OS), from the date of LB testing, was 20 months in the NeoRAS-wt group and 9 months in the persistent RAS-mut group (log-rank 2.985; P = .08), with a 12-month OS of 84.6% and 57.7%, respectively. NeoRAS-wt was identified as a predictor of survival (HR = 0.29; P = .007), with an 11-month improvement in median OS and a 71% decrease in risk of death, in heavily pretreated patients. In conclusion, monitoring clonal evolution in mCRC by LB may provide an additional treatment line for patients with NeoRAS-wt in advanced disease.

A Meta-Analysis Comparing the Relative Efficacy of Pediatric-Inspired Regimens Versus Hyper-CVAD for the Treatment of Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia/Lymphoblastic Lymphoma in Adolescents, Young Adults, and Adults

Background: Acute lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoblastic lymphoma (ALL/LBL)are rare aggressive hematologic malignancies. Children with ALL/LBL have an overall favorable prognosis; however, adult patients (pts) have a poorer outcome. As a result, pediatric or pediatric-inspired regimens with asparaginase (ASP) have been used in adolescents and young adult (AYA) pts with ALL/LBL with promising results. Unfortunately, there are no prospective randomized studies comparing this approach with hyper-CVAD, a commonly used adult regimen not containing ASP. A meta-analysis was conducted to assess the efficacy of pediatric-inspired ASP-containing regimens compared with hyper-CVAD in treating ALL/LBL in AYA and adult pts. Methods: We performed a systematic literature review (using databases including PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library) to identify relevant studies comparing ASP-containing regimens and hyper-CVAD in pts with ALL/LBL published up to April 21, 2022. The search strategy consisted of title/abstract key words and subject headings describing key concepts of “acute lymphoblastic leukemia,” “lymphoblastic lymphoma,” “asparaginase,” “hyper-CVAD,” “refractory,” and “minimal residual disease.” Abstracts were screened for inclusion to identify full texts that were assessed for eligibility. To determine the effects of intervention on complete response (CR) and overall survival (OS) (2 commonly reported outcomes across identified studies), odds ratios (OR) and hazard ratios (HR) were calculated. A meta-analysis was conducted using both random- and fixed-effects models to estimate the pooled OR and HR, 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and 95% prediction intervals (PIs). Scenario analyses identified potential sources of heterogeneity and bias. Results: The initial search identified 46 primary publications of potential relevance: 12 studies directly compared ASP-containing regimens and hyper-CVAD, but none were randomized. Based on direct comparison studies, ASP-containing regimens had statistically significant improvement in median OS (4 studies), 2-year OS (1 study), 3-year OS (3 studies), and 5-year OS (1 study) compared with hyper-CVAD. Four studies with comparable demographics were suitable for meta-analysis (n=702 total pts; n=366 ASP-containing regimens; n=336 hyper-CVAD): 2 studies in AYA (aged 13-43 yrs) and 2 in adults of any age (aged &amp;gt;16 yrs). ASP-containing regimens in the included studies were all based on Berlin-Frankfurt-Münster (BFM) or Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB)-10403 protocols. Pts treated with ASP-containing regimens had a significantly higher chance of achieving CR (random- and fixed-effects model: OR, 2.04 [95% CI: 1.31, 3.18]) and improved OS (random-effects model: HR, 1.76 [95% CI: 1.36, 2.29]; fixed-effects model: HR, 1.75 [95% CI: 1.36, 2.24]) than those treated with hyper-CVAD. There was a low level of heterogeneity among studies for both CR (I 2=0%, tau^2=0.00, P=0.86) and OS (I 2=0%, tau^2=0.02, P=0.79) data. One study evaluated 2 different ASP-containing regimens vs hyper-CVAD. Two separate meta-analyses were executed: 1 pooling results from both treatment arms (base case) and 1 considering them separately (scenario 1). A further analysis was limited to just 2 studies, where the proportionality assumption for the HR was robust and the results consequently most statistically reliable (scenario 2). Compared with the base case, both scenarios yielded similar estimates of treatment effect but with greater heterogeneity and wider PIs. This analysis has limitations: the type of ASP-containing regimen varied (1 study assessed L-ASP regimens, 2 assessed pegaspargase, and 1 did not specify), the studies each took place in different countries potentially contributing to heterogeneity in cultural, genetic, and healthcare practices, and not all details of pts' clinical characteristics were reported to inform on comparability of the pt populations. Further, without head-to-head studies, there was no way to address whether treatment cost or institutional bias affected the results. Conclusion(s): Meta-analysis suggests that ASP-containing regimens are associated with improved rates of CR and OS in AYA (median age range 13-43 yrs) and adult (median age range 16-60 yrs) pts.

UC Trials Get Standing Ovation.

Trials reported at the 2023 ESMO Congress showed significant improvements in median overall survival (OS)-for the first time ever-in patients newly diagnosed with advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma who received combination therapies instead of standard chemotherapy. In one trial, median OS nearly doubled in patients who received the antibody-drug conjugate enfortumab vedotin combined with the PD-1 inhibitor pembrolizumab compared with those who received standard chemotherapy-31.5 months versus 16.1 months. In a second trial, the combination of the PD-1 inhibitor nivolumab and standard chemotherapy bested standard chemotherapy alone.

Checkpoint Inhibitors in Combination With Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors

Although immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) targeting programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) and PD-1 ligand 1 have improved the outcome for many cancer types, the majority of patients fails to respond to ICI monotherapy. Hypofractionated radiotherapy has the potential to improve the therapeutic ratio of ICIs. To assess the addition of radiotherapy to ICIs compared with ICI monotherapy in patients with advanced solid tumors. This open-label, multicenter, randomized phase 2 trial was conducted in 5 Belgian hospitals and enrolled participants between March 2018 and October 2020. Patients 18 years or older with locally advanced or metastatic melanoma, renal cell carcinoma, urothelial carcinoma, head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, or non-small cell lung carcinoma were eligible. A total of 99 patients were randomly assigned to either the control arm (n = 52) or the experimental arm (n = 47). Of those, 3 patients (1 in the control arm vs 2 in the experimental arm) withdrew consent and thus were not included in the analysis. Data analyses were performed between April 2022 and March 2023. Patients were randomized (1:1) to receive anti-PD-1/PD-1 ligand 1 ICIs alone as per standard of care (control arm) or combined with stereotactic body radiotherapy 3 × 8 gray to a maximum of 3 lesions prior to the second or third ICI cycle, depending on the frequency of administration (experimental arm). Randomization was stratified according to tumor histologic findings and disease burden (3 and fewer or more than 3 cancer lesions). The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) as per immune Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. Key secondary end points included overall survival (OS), objective response rate, local control rate, and toxic effects. Efficacy was assessed in the intention-to-treat population, while safety was evaluated in the as-treated population. Among 96 patients included in the analysis (mean age, 66 years; 76 [79%] female), 72 (75%) had more than 3 tumor lesions and 65 (68%) had received at least 1 previous line of systemic treatment at time of inclusion. Seven patients allocated to the experimental arm did not complete the study-prescribed radiotherapy course due to early disease progression (n = 5) or intercurrent illness (n = 2). With a median (range) follow-up of 12.5 (0.7-46.2) months, median PFS was 2.8 months in the control arm compared with 4.4 months in the experimental arm (hazard ratio, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.58-1.53; P = .82). Between the control and experimental arms, no improvement in median OS was observed (11.0 vs 14.3 months; hazard ratio, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.48-1.41; P = .47), and objective response rate was not statistically significantly different (22% vs 27%; P = .56), despite a local control rate of 75% in irradiated patients. Acute treatment-related toxic effects of any grade and grade 3 or higher occurred in 79% and 18% of patients in the control arm vs 78% and 18% in the experimental arm, respectively. No grade 5 adverse events occurred. This phase 2 randomized clinical trial demonstrated that while safe, adding subablative stereotactic radiotherapy of a limited number of metastatic lesions to ICI monotherapy failed to show improvement in PFS or OS. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03511391.

Do future innovations in development influence oncologists’ treatment recommendations today? A survey of U.S. oncologists.

e24004 Background: Survival benefit from current anticancer treatments, even if modest, improves a patient’s chances of accessing and benefiting from future innovations currently in clinical development. No studies to date have evaluated the potential impact of future innovations on oncologists’ treatment recommendations. Methods: We conducted a national survey of medical and hematologic oncologists (n = 200) on how expectations about future innovations may influence their treatment recommendations today. The survey described a hypothetical patient with metastatic cancer, whose median overall survival (OS) was approximately 6 months with most dying within 2 years. We presented four alternative hypothetical scenarios of new innovations in the clinical development pipeline with varying (a) expected efficacy—“modest” (improvement in median OS of 2 months} or “breakthrough” (improvement in median OS of 6 months) and (b) time of arrival (in 6 months or 1 year). We asked the oncologists about the likelihood (using a 5-point Likert scale) (1) that they would discuss these new innovations with the hypothetical metastatic patient, and (2) that these new innovations would influence their recommended treatment for the patient today. We descriptively summarized percentages of oncologists who responded “likely” or “very likely” and examined their associations (using multivariate logistic regression) with the expected efficacy and time of arrival of future innovations as well as the characteristics of oncologists and their practice. Results: When future innovations were expected to have modest efficacy and arrive in 6 months, 61% of oncologists reported that they would be likely or very likely discuss them with their patients, and 52% reported new innovations would influence their treatment recommendations today. With modest efficacy and time of arrival in 1 year, percentages dropped to 49% and 41%, respectively. With breakthrough efficacy and arrival in 6 months, 76% would discuss and 68% would consider new innovations. With breakthrough efficacy and arrival in 1 year, percentages dropped to 62% and 55%, respectively. Greater expected efficacy and shorter time to arrival were associated with a significantly greater likelihood of discussing a future innovations with patients across oncologist and practice characteristics (adjusted odds ratios: breakthrough vs. modest = 1.75; 6 month vs. 1 year = 1.72). Conclusions: Future treatment innovations in clinical development are relevant for decision-making today even when anticipated time to arrival is two times the current median OS. results indicate that it is important to include future innovations in shared decision-making in addition to the benefit-risk balance of current treatments.

Histone deacetylase-based dual targeted inhibition in multiple myeloma.

Despite enormous advances in terms of therapeutic strategies, multiple myeloma (MM) still remains an incurable disease with MM patients often becoming resistant to standard treatments. To date, multiple combined and targeted therapies have proven to be more beneficial compared to monotherapy approaches, leading to a decrease in drug resistance and an improvement in median overall survival in patients. Moreover, recent breakthroughs highlighted the relevant role of histone deacetylases (HDACs) in cancer treatment, including MM. Thus, the simultaneous use of HDAC inhibitors with other conventional regimens, such as proteasome inhibitors, is of interest in the field. In this review, we provide a general overview of HDAC-based combination treatments in MM, through a critical presentation of publications from the past few decades related to in vitro and in vivo studies, as well as clinical trials. Furthermore, we discuss the recent introduction of dual-inhibitor entities that could have the same beneficial effects as drug combinations with the advantage of having two or more pharmacophores in one molecular structure. These findings could represent a starting-point for both reducing therapeutic doses and lowering the risk of developing drug resistance.

The impact of neoadjuvant immunotherapy on perioperative outcomes and survival after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer

ObjectiveImmunotherapy for esophageal cancer is relatively novel but increasingly used. This study evaluated the early use of immunotherapy as an adjunct to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy before esophagectomy for locally advanced disease. MethodsPerioperative morbidity (composite of mortality, hospitalization ≥21 days, or readmission) and survival of patients with locally advanced (cT3N0M0, cT1-3N + M0) distal esophageal cancer in the National Cancer Database from 2013 to 2020 who underwent neoadjuvant immunotherapy plus chemoradiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy alone followed by esophagectomy were evaluated using logistic regression, Kaplan–Meier curves, Cox proportional hazards methods, and propensity-matched analysis. ResultsImmunotherapy was used in 165 (1.6%) of 10,348 patients. Younger age (odds ratio, 0.66; 95% confidence interval, 0.53-0.81; P < .001) predicted immunotherapy use, which slightly delayed time from diagnosis to surgery versus chemoradiation alone (immunotherapy 148 [interquartile range, 128-177] days vs chemoradiation 138 [interquartile range, 120-162] days, P < .001). There were no statistically significant differences between the immunotherapy and chemoradiation groups for the composite major morbidity index (14.5% [24/165] vs 15.6% [1584/10,183], P = .8). Immunotherapy was associated with a significant improvement in median overall survival (69.1 months vs 56.3 months, P = .005) and 3-year overall survival in univariate analysis (65.6% [95% confidence interval, 57.7-74.5] vs 55.0% [53.9-56.1], P = .005), and independently predicted improved survival in multivariable analysis (hazard ratio 0.68 [95% confidence interval, 0.52-0.89], P = .006). Propensity-matched analysis also showed that immunotherapy use was not associated with increased surgical morbidity (P = .5) but was associated with improved survival (P = .047). ConclusionsNeoadjuvant immunotherapy use before esophagectomy for locally advanced esophageal cancer did not lead to worse perioperative outcomes and shows promising results on midterm survival.

Abstract P1-05-28: Decreases in Circulating Tumor Associated Cells Predicts PFS and OS In A Pooled Analysis Of Phase I Clinical Trials Using SV-BR-1-GM Therapy With Or Without Immune Check-Point Inhibitors In Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients

Abstract Background: In metastatic Breast Cancer (mBC), Circulating Tumor Cells (CTCs) are clinical indicators of worse prognosis and indicate patients (pts) not responding to current therapy. However CTCs are rare, found in &amp;lt; 20% of mBC pts, and many pts without CTCs may also progress. Recently an inflammatory pro-tumorigenic PD-L1 expressing macrophage (Cancer associated macrophage-like cell [CAML])was identified in the blood, which was found in &amp;gt;90% of mBC pts and may indicate tumor response to new therapies (JCO 40[16_Suppl] 2022). SV-BR-1-GM is a mBC cell line derived with antigen presenting characteristics was developed for treatment of mBC as a monotherapy (monoTx), or in combination with checkpoint inhibitors (comboTx). We report preliminary post-hoc results of a pooled analysis of n=18 monoTx mBCs pts and interim results of n=15 comboTx to analyze the predictive value of CTCs &amp; CAMLs, as well as CAML PD-L1 expression, isolated from pt peripheral blood pre &amp; post treatment to predict drug response, with end point outcomes of Progression Free Survival (PFS) and Overall Survival (OS) at 24 months. Methods: The SV-BR-1-GM regimen includes low pre-dose cyclophosphamide, intradermal inoculation of ~20 million irradiated SV-BR-1-GM cells and post-dose local interferon-α with cycles every 2 weeks x 3, then monthly. ComboTx adds an anti-PD-1 antibody with cycles every 3 weeks. Blinded blood samples were taken at baseline (BL), prior to starting SV-BR-1-GM therapy (n=33), and a 2nd sample (T1) taken after therapy initiation (~52 days) obtained as part of the exploratory portion of 2 prospective phase I clinical drug studies, NCT03066947 &amp; NCT03328026, to evaluate the predictive value of CTCs/CAMLs and CAML PD-L1 measured by LifeTracDx liquid biopsy. The quantities of CTCs &amp; CAMLs were analyzed based on PFS using RECIST v1.1 and OS hazard ratios (HRs) by censored univariate analysis at 24 months. Results: A total of 33 mBC pts were pooled from monoTx (n=18), or comboTx (n =15), all with available blood samples at BL. CTCs were found in 30% (n=10/33) of pts at BL, and CAMLs were found in 94% (n=31/33) at BL. Presence of CTCs at BL did not correlate with worse PFS (HR=1.0, p=0.8550), but did trend for pts with worse survival (HR=5.1, p=0.0641). T1 samples were available from 61% (n=20/33) pts. A drop in CAMLs or CTCs after treatment at T1 was observed in 50% of pts, which correlated with a significantly improved PFS HR=11.8, p=0.0019 and OS HR=226.3, p=0.0397. Overall, pts with a decrease in CTCs/CAMLs after induction of SV-BR-1-GM therapy had a ~350% improvement in median PFS (1.9 mo. vs 6.6 mo.) and a ~200% improvement in median OS (6.3 mo. vs 12.4 mo). When stratified between monoTx and comboTx, pts with a decrease in CTCs/CAMLs had an improved PFS (HR 11.9, p=0.0136) in the monoTx group and an improved PFS (HR 17.5, p=0.0017) in the comboTx group. Further, while expression of CAML PDL1 at BL was not correlated with improved PFS (HR=1.0, p=0.9078), CAML PD-L1 expression at BL was correlated with significantly better OS HR=9.5, p=0.0116, consistent with long term benefit of SV-BR-1-GM therapy in this group of pts. Conclusions: We observed that treatment with the SV-BR-1-GM regimen was associated with decreases in the presence of CTCs and CAMLs in 50% of patients, which also significantly correlated with ~350% better median PFS and ~200% better median OS within 2 years. SV-BR-1-GM therapy alone, or as a combination treatment with anti-PD-1, appears to have improved long term clinical outcomes in a large portion of heavily pre-treated mBC patients compared to other typical standard of care published results. Citation Format: Daniel Adams, Mingjin Chang, Miguel Lopez-Lago, Cha-Mei Tang, William Williams, Giuseppe Del Priore. Decreases in Circulating Tumor Associated Cells Predicts PFS and OS In A Pooled Analysis Of Phase I Clinical Trials Using SV-BR-1-GM Therapy With Or Without Immune Check-Point Inhibitors In Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-05-28.

Abstract P5-01-04: Contralateral Axillary Lymph Node Metastasis after Ipsilateral Breast Tumor Recurrence: Is it distant metastasis or locoregional progression?

Abstract Background: Contralateral axillary lymph node metastasis (CAM) in breast cancer is currently classified as a stage IV disease but its prognosis is still controversial. Purpose: To determine outcomes in overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) in patients with and without locoregional tumor recurrence who present with contralateral axillary lymph node metastasis (CAM). Methods: Patients with pathologically confirmed invasive breast cancer with metachronous CAM who received treatment between 1988 and 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with other distant metastases at the time of CAM diagnosis were excluded. The outcome of CAM in cases of IBTR and regional recurrence (RR) were compared to CAM not accompanied by locoregional tumor recurrence. Results: Thirty-eight patients with metachronous CAM were included in the study. Metachronous CAM occurred 55 months (interquartile range, 17-77 months) after surgical treatment of the primary tumor and median follow-up was 95 months (interquartile range, 49-117 months) from the initial operation date and 40 months (interquartile range, 15-54 months) from the diagnosis of CAM. At the time of initial CAM diagnosis, 11 patients had IBTR, 12 patients had RR, and 15 patients had no locoregional recurrence. The estimated 5-year OS was 49.1% and 5-year DFS was 45.3%. Although statistically insignificant due to small sample size, when stratified by loco regional recurrence, the prognosis of CAM patients with IBTR appeared to be better than those without locoregional recurrence (5-year OS: 88.9% vs. 41.4%, HR 5.88, p = 0.09) whereas the prognosis of CAM patients with RR was worse than those without locoregional recurrence (5-year OS: 35.4% vs. 41.4%, HR 0.44, p = 0.20). Axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) improved median OS (83 vs. 36 months, p = 0.069) in all patients. When stratified, improvement in median OS was 13 vs 27 months (p = 0.094) in patients with RR, and 36 vs. 65 months (p = 0.061) in patients without locoregional recurrence. For patients accompanied by IBTR, ALND was performed in 8 out of 11 and only one patient died during the follow-up period. Conclusion: Our study indicates that the patients with CAM have superior survival outcome when compared to other stage IV patients, especially when CAM was accompanied by other loco regional recurrences. These data suggest that the CAM patients may benefit from active loco regional treatment. Citation Format: Ji-Jung Jung, Hyeong-Gon Moon, Wonshik Han, Han-Byoel Lee, Hong-Kyu Kim, Jung Whan Chun, Eunhye Kang, Changjin Lim, Jang-il Kim, Hyunsu Yeoh. Contralateral Axillary Lymph Node Metastasis after Ipsilateral Breast Tumor Recurrence: Is it distant metastasis or locoregional progression? [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-01-04.