Improvement In Progression-free Survival Research Articles

Toripalimab Plus Chemotherapy as a First-Line Therapy for Extensive-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer: The Phase 3 EXTENTORCH Randomized Clinical Trial.

Patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) have poor prognoses and unmet medical needs. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of toripalimab plus etoposide and platinum-based chemotherapy (EP) vs placebo plus EP as a first-line treatment for patients with ES-SCLC. This multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 randomized clinical trial (EXTENTORCH study) enrolled patients from September 26, 2019, to May 20, 2021, and was conducted at 49 sites in China. Eligible patients had histologically or cytologically confirmed ES-SCLC without previous systemic antitumor therapy for ES-SCLC. Data were analyzed between May 6, 2023, and June 1, 2024. Patients were randomized (1:1) to receive toripalimab, 240 mg, or placebo plus EP every 3 weeks for up to 4 to 6 cycles, followed by maintenance with toripalimab or placebo until disease progression, intolerable toxic effects, or up to 2 years of treatment. The primary end points were investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Whole-exome sequencing results identified correlative biomarkers for clinical efficacy. Among 595 screened patients, 442 eligible patients were randomized (median [range] age, 63 [30-77] years; 366 [82.8%] male); 223 patients were randomized to toripalimab plus EP, and 219 to placebo plus EP. By April 20, 2023, the median (range) survival follow-up was 13.7 (0.0-42.7) months. Compared with placebo, toripalimab improved investigator-assessed PFS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.67 [95% CI, 0.54-0.82]; P < .001), and significantly reduced the risk of death (HR, 0.80 [95% CI, 0.65-0.98]; P = .03). The median OS was 14.6 (95% CI, 12.9-16.6) months in the toripalimab group vs 13.3 (95% CI, 11.8-14.4) months in the placebo group. Whole-exome sequencing results from 300 patients identified low intratumor heterogeneity, HLA-A11+ HLA-B62- haplotype, wild-type KMT2D and COL4A4, or sequence variations in CTNNA2 or SCN4A correlated with favorable PFS and OS in the toripalimab group. No new safety signals were observed. Grade 3 or higher treatment-emergent adverse event incidence was similar between the toripalimab and placebo safety set groups (199 of 222 patients [89.6%] vs 193 of 216 patients [89.4%], respectively). In this phase 3 randomized clinical trial, adding toripalimab to first-line chemotherapy demonstrated significant improvements in PFS and OS for patients with ES-SCLC. The treatment exhibited an acceptable safety profile, supporting this combination regimen as a new treatment option for patients with ES-SCLC. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04012606.

INNV-14. OUTCOMES OF PATIENTS WITH ISOCITRATE DEHYDROGENASE-MUTANT WHO GRADE 4 ASTROCYTOMA TREATED WITH TUMOR TREATING FIELDS (TTFIELDS) THERAPY: A REAL-WORLD ANALYSIS

Abstract BACKGROUND Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields) therapy is approved for the treatment of patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma, based on the EF-14 study which demonstrated improvement in progression free survival and overall survival (OS). EF-14 included patients with the isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutation (IDHmut), which has since been reclassified as IDHmut WHO grade 4 astrocytoma (Astrocytoma IDHmut/G4) and confers a more favorable prognosis than IDH wild type. However, large real-world datasets are lacking. Here, we report real-world outcomes of patients with Astrocytoma IDHmut/G4 treated with TTFields in the US. METHODS Utilizing electronic health records from the xCures real-world data platform, patients with newly diagnosed Astrocytoma IDHmut/G4 receiving TTFields in the US from January 1 to December 31, 2019 were analyzed and IDH-mut status was confirmed. Survival was analyzed based on IDH-mut status and TTFields usage, with patients categorized into 2 usage groups (minimum 30 days treatment): high (≥50%) and low (&amp;lt;50%) usage. RESULTS Among 1285 patients with known IDH status, 82 had an IDH-mut and were included. The median (range) age of patients was 40.6 (21–75) years, with the majority being men (n=58/71%) and with methylguanine-methyltransferase-promoter methylation (n=48/59%). Median TTFields therapy duration and usage were 9.4 months and 76.8%, respectively. OS at 2 and 4 years was 66% (95% CI: 56–77%) and 44% (34–57%), respectively. Patients with high TTFields usage had increased OS compared to low usage (HR: 0.53 [0.28–1.02], P=0.057, n=80). Among 22 patients with a minimum 4 years of survival, 5 were still on therapy as of the data cutoff. CONCLUSIONS These findings demonstrate the utility of the xCures platform in systematically assessing outcomes for a rare glioma subtype in the real-world setting, and suggests that patients with Astrocytoma IDHmut/G4 may benefit from TTFields therapy. Additional patient follow-up and correlative data will be presented.

CTNI-53. A GLOBAL, RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLINDED, PHASE 3 STUDY OF VORASIDENIB VERSUS PLACEBO IN PATIENTS WITH ADULT-TYPE DIFFUSE GLIOMA WITH AN IDH1/2 MUTATION (INDIGO): UPDATED EFFICACY RESULTS

Abstract INTRODUCTION The Phase 3 INDIGO study (NCT04164901) evaluated vorasidenib, an oral, brain-penetrant, dual inhibitor of mutated isocitrate dehydrogenase 1/2 (mIDH1/2), in patients with mIDH1/2 diffuse glioma. The primary endpoint of progression-free survival (PFS) per blinded independent review committee (BIRC), and key secondary endpoint of time to next intervention (TTNI), were met in the positive, preplanned second interim analysis (IA2). The study was unblinded in March 2023 following independent data monitoring committee recommendation. Here, we present results after an additional 6 months of follow-up between the database lock for IA2 (September 6, 2022) and study unblinding (March 7, 2023). METHODS Patients with residual/recurrent grade 2 mIDH1/2 oligodendroglioma or astrocytoma were enrolled (≥12 years; Karnofsky Performance Status ≥80; measurable non-enhancing disease; surgery as only prior treatment; no immediate need of chemoradiotherapy). Patients were randomized 1:1 to vorasidenib 40 mg or placebo daily in 28-day cycles. RESULTS Overall, 331 patients were randomized (median age: 40.0 years; oligodendroglioma: 172; astrocytoma: 159). As of March 7, 2023, 123/168 (73%) patients remained on vorasidenib and 72/163 (44%) remained on placebo. PFS per BIRC remained in favor of vorasidenib (HR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.25–0.49), and was consistent with PFS per investigator assessment (HR, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.23–0.50). Median PFS per BIRC: vorasidenib, not estimable (NE; 95% CI, 22.1–NE); placebo, 11.4 months (95% CI, 11.1–13.9). TTNI also remained in favor of vorasidenib (HR, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.16–0.40). Median TTNI: vorasidenib, NE (95% CI, NE–NE); placebo, 20.1 months (95% CI, 17.5–27.1). No new safety signals emerged. CONCLUSIONS Vorasidenib is a targeted therapy for patients with predominantly non-enhancing mIDH1/2 diffuse glioma following surgical intervention, as shown in the INDIGO population. These additional 6 months of follow-up confirm the previously reported statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvements in PFS and TTNI with vorasidenib.

NCOG-25. STEREOTACTIC RADIOSURGERY VERSUS SURGICAL MICRODISSECTION FOR JUGULAR FORAMEN SCHWANNOMAS: A RETROSPECTIVE COMPARATIVE STUDY

Abstract INTRODUCTION Jugular foramen schwannomas (JFS) are rare, benign tumors arising from lower cranial nerves. Given their delicate location, surgical microdissection carries a substantial risk of neurological morbidity. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) presents an alternative, particularly for smaller or residual tumors. OBJECTIVE This study aims to compare the outcomes and symptomatic improvements between these two treatment modalities. METHODS We conducted a retrospective analysis of 32 patients with JFS who underwent SRS (13 cases [40.6%]) or surgical dissection (19 cases [59.4%]) as their primary management at Stanford Medical Center between 1998 and 2024. Outcomes included progression-free survival (PFS), post-management adverse events based on common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE), symptom improvement, overall survival (OS), and the necessity for secondary interventions. RESULTS Significant differences were observed in baseline characteristics between the SRS and surgery groups, including mean age (62.52 vs. 46.87 years, p&amp;lt;0.001), mean largest diameter (34.38 vs. 53.66 mm, p=0.02), and median total tumor volume (6.50 vs. 19.70 mm3, p=0.009). There were no significant differences in sex or lesion shape (dumbbell vs. non-dumbbell shaped). After adjusting for baseline characteristics, no significant differences were noted in PFS (85.71 vs. 77.77%), OS (92.3 vs 100%), symptom improvement (61.53 vs. 52.63%) or mean CTCAE grade (1.31 vs. 1.58) between the SRS and surgery groups. SRS patients had significantly lower odds of requiring secondary treatment procedures after their primary intervention as compared to those in the surgery group (OR=0.01, 95% CI: 0.0001-0.59, p=0.02). CONCLUSION Both SRS and surgery provide exceptional outcomes for JFS with no significant differences in PFS, OS, CTCAE grades, or symptom improvement between the two groups. However, SRS patients had lower odds of requiring secondary interventions for JFS. This is among the first studies comparing surgical microdissection and SRS for JFS. Future controlled prospective studies are necessary to derive more definitive conclusions.

CTNI-15. A PERIOPERATIVE STUDY OF SAFUSIDENIB IN PATIENTS WITH IDH1 MUTATED GLIOMA

Abstract BACKGROUND IDH mutations cause aberrant accumulation of (R)-2-hydroxyglutarate (2-HG), an oncometabolite that promotes tumorigenesis through abnormal hypermethylation of histones and DNA as well as suppression of normal cellular differentiation. IDH inhibition significantly improves progression free survival in patients with IDH mutant WHO grade 2 glioma, however most patients progress, and there is a lack of understanding on mechanistic reasons for failure. METHODS We tested Safusidenib, an oral, blood brain barrier penetrant IDH1 R132X enzyme inhibitor in a single arm, open label perioperative study. Patients with IDH1 mutated glioma, treatment naïve to radiation or chemotherapy, received Safusidenib (250 mg BID) for four weeks following surgical biopsy and prior to definitive resection (Part A). After resection patients continued Safusidenib until toxicity or progression (Part B). Translational endpoints include paired whole genome transcriptome sequencing (WGTS), single nuclei RNA sequencing (snRNAseq), spatial transcriptomics and spatial metabolomics as well as longitudinal sampling of blood and CSF for circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA). Here we are reporting Part A of the study. RESULTS As of May/27/2024 10 patients (mean age 37, 40% female) have been enrolled: seven with astrocytoma, three with oligodendroglioma; six had prior surgical resection. Pharmacokinetic sampling showed a mean tumor concentration 2457 ng/mL (range 957.0 – 4810) with tumor:plasma ratio 0.33. Consistent with mechanism, tumor 2-HG reduced 86% from biopsy (mean 75.0μM, range 7.8-203) to surgery (10.3μM, range 2.3 – 30.8), as well as identification of novel biomarkers of response. Paired tumour snRNAseq reveals transcriptional shift with changing cell-to-cell communication, and increased immune infiltration post-treatment, validated by spatial transcriptomics. Additionally, we find reduced heterogeneity consistent with a more differentiated tumour state. Treatment was well tolerated with ongoing follow-up. CONCLUSIONS This innovative trial facilitates intra-patient comparisons and confirmation of the on-target effects of Safusidenib, enhancing understanding of the mechanisms of response and resistance. The approach serves as a proof of concept for advancing drug development in glioma through perioperative trials.

Cisplatin- or Carboplatin-Based Chemotherapy Plus Pembrolizumab in Advanced Urothelial Cancer: Exploratory Analysis From the Phase 3 KEYNOTE-361 Study

IntroductionKEYNOTE-361 evaluated first-line pembrolizumab with and without platinum-based chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone in advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma. The primary end points of progression-free survival (PFS) or overall survival (OS) were not met. Exploratory analysis of efficacy by platinum agent (cisplatin or carboplatin) is reported. Patients and MethodsEligible patients were randomly assigned 1:1:1 to receive pembrolizumab 200 mg intravenously every 3 weeks for ≤35 cycles with or without chemotherapy (gemcitabine with investigator's choice of either cisplatin or carboplatin) or chemotherapy alone. This exploratory subset analysis evaluated PFS and objective response rate (ORR) per RECIST v1.1 by blinded independent central review and OS for cisplatin- or carboplatin-based chemotherapy with versus without pembrolizumab for patients assigned to chemotherapy-containing arms of KEYNOTE-361. ResultsOf 1010 patients enrolled, 703 were assigned to receive a chemotherapy-containing regimen (n = 312 cisplatin based; n = 391 carboplatin based). Median follow-up was 31.3 months. For cisplatin-based arms, with versus without pembrolizumab, median OS was 20.1 versus 16.4 months (HR 0.88, 95% CI 0.67-1.15) and median PFS was 8.5 versus 7.1 months (HR 0.67, 0.51-0.89). ORR was 64.1% versus 48.7%, respectively. For carboplatin-based arms, with versus without pembrolizumab, median OS was 15.5 versus 12.3 months (HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.67-1.06) and median PFS was 8.0 versus 6.7 months (HR 0.86, 0.68-1.09). ORR was 47.2% versus 41.8%, respectively. Among patients in the cisplatin-based versus carboplatin-based chemotherapy alone arms, 55.8% versus 41.8% received a subsequent anti–programmed cell death protein 1/ligand 1 therapy. The addition of pembrolizumab did not significantly increase the incidence of adverse events reported. ConclusionResults suggest trends towards OS and PFS improvements with the addition of pembrolizumab to gemcitabine-platinum doublet over gemcitabine-platinum alone regardless of whether cisplatin or carboplatin was the chosen platinum agent. OS may have been influenced by active subsequent therapies. MicroAbstractUntil recently, the standard first-line treatment for advanced urothelial carcinoma included platinum-based chemotherapy containing either cisplatin or carboplatin. This exploratory analysis from the KEYNOTE-361 study describes efficacy outcomes with the addition of pembrolizumab to cisplatin- or carboplatin-based chemotherapy to determine if there are differences in clinical benefit between patients who received cisplatin-based versus carboplatin-based combination therapy.

Efficacy and safety of bevacizumab combined with temozolomide in the treatment of glioma a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials.

Glioma is the most common malignant brain tumor in neurosurgery. Bevacizumab (BEV) is a monoclonal antibody that inhibits tumors by inhibiting vascular endothelial growth factor and reducing tumor angiogenesis. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of BEV combined with temozolomide (TMZ) in glioma, we performed a meta-analysis. PubMed, Embase, The Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases were searched for randomized controlled trials comparing survival outcomes between TMZ combined with BEV and TMZ alone as well as cohort studies were included in our study. The primary outcome measures analyzed were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). A total of six randomized controlled trials and four cohort studies with a total of 2515 patients were included in our meta-analysis. The results of meta-analysis suggested that there were no significant improvements in overall survival, but the combination of TMZ and BEV prolonged progression-free survival, improved overall response rate (ORR), and increased the incidence of some adverse reactions, compared with TMZ alone. Subgroup analysis suggested sex, recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) grade, MGMT gene status and radiotherapy combination did not affect the improvement of OS with the combination of the two drugs, and RPA grade did not affect the improvement of PFS with the combination of the two drugs. The combination of TMZ and BEV can improve PFS as well as ORR in patients and has no benefit on OS. At the same time, the adverse reactions during the combination of the two drugs were acceptable.

Abemaciclib plus non-steroidal aromatase inhibitor or fulvestrant in women with HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer: Final results of the randomized phase III MONARCH plus trial.

In the interim analysis of MONARCH plus, adding abemaciclib to endocrine therapy (ET) improved progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rate (ORR) in predominantly Chinese postmenopausal women with HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer (ABC). This study presents the final pre-planned PFS analysis. In the phase III MONARCH plus study, postmenopausal women in China, India, Brazil, and South Africa with HR+/HER2- ABC without prior systemic therapy in an advanced setting (cohort A) or progression on prior ET (cohort B) were randomized (2:1) to abemaciclib (150mg twice daily [BID]) or placebo plus: anastrozole (1.0mg/day) or letrozole (2.5mg/day) (cohort A) or fulvestrant (500mg) (cohort B). The primary endpoint was PFS of cohort A. Secondary endpoints included cohort B PFS (key secondary endpoint), ORR, overall survival (OS), safety, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). In cohort A (abemaciclib: n =207; placebo: n =99), abemaciclib plus a non-steroidal aromatase inhibitor improved median PFS vs . placebo (28.27months vs . 14.73months, hazard ratio [HR]: 0.476; 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 0.348-0.649). In cohort B (abemaciclib: n =104; placebo: n =53), abemaciclib plus fulvestrant improved median PFS vs . placebo (11.41months vs . 5.59months, HR: 0.480; 95% CI: 0.322-0.715). Abemaciclib numerically improved ORR. Although immature, a trend toward OS benefit with abemaciclib was observed (cohort A: HR: 0.893, 95% CI: 0.553-1.443; cohort B: HR: 0.512, 95% CI: 0.281-0.931). The most frequent grade ≥3 adverse events in the abemaciclib arms were neutropenia, leukopenia, anemia (both cohorts), and lymphocytopenia (cohort B). Abemaciclib did not cause clinically meaningful changes in patient-reported global health, functioning, or most symptoms vs . placebo. Abemaciclib plus ET led to improvements in PFS and ORR, a manageable safety profile, and sustained HRQoL, providing clinical benefit without a high toxicity burden or reduced quality of life. ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02763566).

Real-World Evidence on Prognostic Value of MRD in Multiple Myeloma Using Flow Cytometry.

Minimal residual disease (MRD) is one of the most important prognostic factors in multiple myeloma (MM) and a valid surrogate for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Recently, MRD negativity was approved as an early clinical endpoint for accelerated drug approval in MM. Nevertheless, there is limited evidence of MRD utility in real-world setting. In this retrospective multicenter study, we report outcomes of 331 newly diagnosed MM patients with MRD evaluation at Day+100 after autologous stem cell transplantation using flow cytometry with a median limit of detection of 0.001%. MRD negativity was reached in 47% of patients and was associated with significantly prolonged median PFS (49.2 months vs. 18.4 months; hazard ratios (HR) = 0.37; p < 0.001) and OS (not reached vs. 74.9 months; HR = 0.50; p = 0.007). Achieving MRD negativity was associated with PFS improvements regardless of age, International Staging System (ISS) stage, lactate dedydrogenase (LDH) level, or cytogenetic risk. Importantly, MRD positive patients benefited from lenalidomide maintenance versus no maintenance (18-months PFS: 81% vs. 46%; HR = 0.24; p = 0.002) while in MRD negative patients such benefit was not observed (p = 0.747). The outcomes of our real-world study recapitulate results from clinical trials including meta-analyses and support the idea that MRD positive patients profit more from lenalidomide maintenance than MRD negative ones.

Spinal chordoma and chondrosarcoma treatment experiences - a 20-year retrospective study from databases of two medical centers

The research retrospectively analyzed cases of spinal chordoma and chondrosarcoma involving patients who received treatment at the two hospitals between 2001 and 2023. Among the 48 patients studied (39 chordoma and 9 chondrosarcoma cases), the average age was 53.9 ± 15.8 years, with a range of 17 to 86 years. Out of these patients, 43 underwent excision surgery and were categorized based on tumor margin into negative (R0) or microscopically positive (R1) margin (n = 14) and macroscopically positive (R2) margin (n = 29) groups. The mean overall survival (OS) for R0/R1 and R2 groups was 156.5 ± 19.3 and 79.2 ± 11.9 months, respectively (p value = 0.012). The mean progression-free survival (PFS) for R0/R1 and R2 was 112.9 ± 24.4 and 25.5 ± 5.5 months (p value < 0.001). The study showed that regardless of whether patients in the R0/R1 or R2 groups received radiation therapy (RT) or not, there was no significant improvement in OS or PFS. Specifically, the OS and PFS for the RT only group were 75.9 ± 16.6 and 73.3 ± 18.0 months. In conclusion, the recommended treatment approach for spinal chordoma and chondrosarcoma remains en bloc resection surgery with an appropriate margin. Patients who are unsuitable for or decline surgery may find a beneficial disease control rate with traditional external beam photon/proton therapy.

Different Prophylaxis Strategies for Central Nervous System Recurrence of Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma

To analyze the effects of highdose methotrexate (HD-MTX) and lenalidomide as central nervous system (CNS) prophylaxis strategies in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). The data of DLBCL patients with high risk of CNS recurrence who were initially treated in Fujian Provincial Hospital and Fujian Cancer Hospital from January 2012 to June 2022 were analyzed retrospectively. The patients were divided into HD-MTX group and lenalidomide group according to different prophylaxis strategies. Each group was further divided into high-risk group and medium-risk group based on CNS-IPI score and/or testicular involvement. The CNS relapse-free survival (CRFS) rate, adverse effects, and the effects of different prophylaxis strategies on overall survival (OS) rate and progression-free survival (PFS) rate were evaluated in different groups and subgroups. There were 200 patients enrolled in this study, 80 cases in lenalidomide group and 120 cases in HD-MTX group. According to the delivery timing of prophylactic HD-MTX, the patients in HD-MTX group were further divided into two groups: 80 cases at the end of induction chemotherapy and 40 cases during chemotherapy interval. At a median follow-up of 48(14-133) months, the 4-year CRFS rate, 4-year PFS rate, and 4-year OS rate of the HD-MTX group was 93.6%, 57.2%, and 68.8%, respectively, while that of the lenalidomide group was 90.4%, 69.4% and 75.6%. There were no significant differences in 4-year CRFS rate, 4-year PFS rate, and 4-year OS rate between HD-MTX group and lenalidomide group (all P >0.05), but lenalidomide group showed a trend of improvement in PFS. Further subgroup analysis showed that there was no significant difference in 4-year CRFS rate between high-risk patients of the two groups (91.7% vs 83.4%, P >0.05), while 4-year PFS rate showed difference (49.5% vs 64.2%, P <0.05). A total of 248 cycles were collected for adverse reaction analysis in the HD-MTX group, and 25 cycles occurred neutropenia accompanied with infection (10.1%), while in lenalidomide group 240 cycles were collected in which 20 cycles occurred neutropenia accompanied with infection (8.3%). Both the two groups had no treatment-related deaths. Compared with HD-MTX, lenalidomide combined with immunochemotherapy can prevent CNS relapse, at the same time, improve prognosis, which is a safe and well tolerated central prophylaxis strategy.

Sacituzumab govitecan in HR+HER2- metastatic breast cancer: the randomized phase 3 EVER-132-002 trial.

Sacituzumab govitecan (SG) significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) versus chemotherapy in hormone receptor-positive human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HR+HER2-) metastatic breast cancer (mBC) in the global TROPiCS-02 study. TROPiCS-02 enrolled few Asian patients. Here we report results of SG in Asian patients with HR+HER2- mBC from the EVER-132-002 study. Patients were randomized to SG (n = 166) or chemotherapy (n = 165). The primary endpoint was met: PFS was improved with SG versus chemotherapy (hazard ratio of 0.67, 95% confidence interval 0.52-0.87; P = 0.0028; median 4.3 versus 4.2 months). OS also improved with SG versus chemotherapy (hazard ratio of 0.64, 95% confidence interval 0.47-0.88; P = 0.0061; median 21.0 versus 15.3 months). The most common grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events were neutropenia, leukopenia and anemia. SG demonstrated significant and clinically meaningful improvement in PFS and OS versus chemotherapy, with a manageable safety profile consistent with prior studies. SG represents a promising treatment option for Asian patients with HR+HER2- mBC (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier no. NCT04639986 ).

Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy versus Radiotherapy Alone in the Treatment of Stage II and T3N0M0 Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

AimsThe efficacy of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) for Stage II and T3N0 nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), particularly during the shift from two-dimensional conventional radiotherapy (2DCRT) to intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) is debated.Therefore this study aims to systematically evaluate and meta-analyze survival benefits of CCRT versus radiotherapy alone for Stage II and T3N0 NPC, stratified by radiotherapy techniques. Materials and methodsAs of April 1, 2024, we conducted an exhaustive literature search across databases such as PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science, with the aim of identifying and screening studies that compare the efficacy of CCRT versus radiotherapy alone in the treatment of Stage II and T3N0 NPC. ResultsA total of 10 studies encompassing 5015 patients were included in this comprehensive analysis. The findings indicate that, apart from progression-free survival (PFS), CCRT did not improve survival outcomes, including overall survival (OS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), local recurrence-free survival (LRRFS), and failure-free survival (FFS), with all P values exceeding 0.05. Concurrently, the incidence of grade ≥3 adverse events associated with CCRT was significantly elevated (odds ratio [OR] = 3.77, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.75–5.15, P < 0.0001). Subgroup analysis revealed that, compared with RT, the combination of 2DCRT with concurrent chemotherapy significantly improved OS (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.57, 95% CI = 0.46–0.71, P < 0.00001), PFS (HR = 0.65, 95% CI=0.53–0.78, P < 0.00001), DMFS (HR = 0.54, 95% CI = 0.37–0.79, P = 0.002), and LRRFS (HR = 0.63, 95% CI = 0.49–0.82, P = 0.0005). In contrast, the combination of IMRT with concurrent chemotherapy failed to demonstrate improvements in OS, PFS, DMFS, or LRRFS, with all P values exceeding 0.05. ConclusionIn contrast with RT, CCRT did not enhance survival in stage II and T3N0 NPC patients, yet caused more adverse reactions. 2DCRT combined with concurrent chemotherapy significantly improved OS, PFS, DMFS, and LRRFS, while IMRT with concurrent chemotherapy showed no clinical benefits.

Analysis of progression-free and overall survival in ovarian cancer: Bevacizumab treatment outcomes using historical cohort.

Background: The incorporation of bevacizumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), has redefined therapeutic strategies for advanced ovarian cancer. This study evaluates the efficacy of bevacizumab combined with standard chemotherapy by comparing progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) outcomes with a historical cohort of patients treated with standard chemotherapy alone. Methods: We conducted an analysis of 71 patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer treated at the University Clinical Center in Niš, Serbia, from April 2017 to March 2023. All patients received standard chemotherapy paired with bevacizumab and were monitored for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) using Kaplan-Meier estimates. Subgroup analyses were performed based on age, ECOG performance status, presence of metastases, and pleural effusion. Additionally, a historical cohort of 30 patients treated with standard chemotherapy alone was used for comparison, and Cox regression analysis was conducted to identify factors influencing treatment outcomes. Results: The study findings indicate significant improvements in median PFS (20 months vs. 15 months) and OS (58 months vs. an undetermined upper limit) compared to the historical cohort. Subgroup analysis of the bevacizumab-treated group revealed that younger patients (<65 years) and those without metastases or pleural effusion exhibited notably better survival outcomes. The hazard ratio for PFS in patients younger than 65 was 0.65 (95% CI: 0.45-0.93), suggesting a substantial reduction in disease progression risk compared to older patients. Conclusion: Bevacizumab, when used alongside standard chemotherapy, significantly extends both PFS and OS in patients with advanced ovarian cancer. These benefits are particularly pronounced in younger patients. The results underscore the necessity of integrating bevacizumab into the treatment regimen for advanced ovarian cancer, advocating for tailored therapeutic strategies based on individual risk profiles and clinical characteristics. This study reinforces the pivotal role of bevacizumab in enhancing the current ovarian cancer treatment landscape and highlights the potential for further personalizing oncological care.

Patient-reported outcomes in the subpopulation of patients with mismatch repair-deficient/microsatellite instability-high primary advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer treated with dostarlimab plus chemotherapy compared with chemotherapy alone in the ENGOT-EN6-NSGO/GOG3031/RUBY trial

ObjectiveIn the ENGOT-EN6-NSGO/GOG3031/RUBY trial, dostarlimab+carboplatin–paclitaxel demonstrated significant improvement in progression free survival and a positive trend in overall survival compared with placebo+carboplatin–paclitaxel, with manageable toxicity, in patients with primary advanced...

Longitudinal follow up of a phase 2 trial of venetoclax added to hyper-CVAD, nelarabine and pegylated asparaginase in patients with T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia and lymphoma.

Optimal frontline use of active agents in T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma (T-ALL/LBL) is prudent to improve outcomes. We report the long-term follow-up of the phase 2 trial of HyperCVAD with nelarabine and pegylated asparaginase (Original cohort). In the latest protocol iteration venetoclax was added to the induction/consolidation regimen (Venetoclax cohort). Eligible patients were adults with untreated T-ALL/LBL or after minimal therapy and with adequate organ function. Primary endpoint of this analysis was improvement in 2-year progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) with venetoclax. From Aug 2007 to Dec 2024, 145 patients, at a median age of 35.4 years, were treated; 46 (33.8%) were in the venetoclax cohort. At median follow-up (mFU) of 62.4 months, 5-year PFS, duration of response (DOR), and OS were 63.7%, 72.0% and 66.2% respectively. In the venetoclax cohort (mFU 24.4 months) 2-year PFS (87.9% versus 64.1%, p = 0.03) and 2-year DOR (93.6% versus 69.2%, p = 0.005) were superior to the original cohort (mFU 89.4 months) and 2-year OS appeared better (87.8% versus 73.9%, p = 0.16). Febrile neutropenia was the most common serious adverse event, seen in 60% patients. The addition of venetoclax to HyperCVAD-nelarabine-pegylated asparaginase was tolerable and led to improvement in DOR and PFS.

Efficacy and safety of PARP inhibitor maintenance therapy for ovarian cancer: a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of randomized controlled trials.

The landscape of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor treatment for ovarian cancer (OC) is continually evolving. This research aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of PARP inhibitors compared to placebo as a maintenance therapy for OC patients. We conducted a search of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving the use of PARP inhibitors as maintenance therapy in OC patients, up to 16 June 2024. Data regarding progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), chemotherapy-free interval (CFI), time to first subsequent therapy or death (TFST), time to second subsequent therapy or death (TSST), and treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were aggregated. Pooled hazard ratio (HR) and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for PFS, OS, CFI, TFST, and TSST. Additionally, the relative risk (RR) and 95% CI for TEAEs were determined. This meta-analysis encompassed 20 RCTs involving 7,832 participants. The overall analysis demonstrated that maintenance therapy with PARP inhibitors led to significant improvements in PFS (HR: 0.398, 95% CI = 0.339-0.467, 95% PI = 0.219-0.724), OS (HR: 0.677, 95% CI = 0.582-0.788, 95% PI = 0.546-0.839), CFI (HR: 0.417, 95% CI = 0.368-0.472, 95% PI = 0.265-0.627), TFST (HR: 0.441, 95% CI = 0.391-0.498, 95% PI = 0.308-0.632), and TSST (HR: 0.574, 95% CI = 0.507-0.649, 95% PI = 0.488-0.674) compared with placebo. Subgroup analyses further indicated that PARP inhibitor maintenance treatment significantly improved PFS, regardless of homologous recombination status (all p < 0.05). However, the risks of any grade (RR = 1.046, 95% CI = 1.032-1.059, 95% PI = 1.028-1.055) and grade ≥3 TEAEs (RR = 2.931, 95% CI = 2.641-3.253, 95% PI = 2.128-3.792) were increased by PARP inhibitor maintenance therapy compared to placebo. Our research elucidated the benefits of maintenance therapy with PARP inhibitors in patients with OC, showing improvements in PFS, OS, CFI, TFST, and TSST. Vigilance regarding TEAEs is paramount for clinicians implementing PARP inhibitor maintenance therapy in clinical practice. https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier CRD42024560286.

Osimertinib after definitive chemoradiotherapy in unresectable stage III epidermal growth factor receptor-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer: analyses of central nervous system efficacy and distant progression from the phase III LAURA study

Distant metastases in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are a poor prognostic factor that negatively impact quality of life. The central nervous system (CNS) is a common site of distant progression in epidermal growth factor receptor-mutated (EGFRm) NSCLC. Osimertinib is a third-generation EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor recommended for advanced EGFRm NSCLC and as adjuvant treatment for resected EGFRm NSCLC. In LAURA (NCT03521154), osimertinib demonstrated statistically significant improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) versus placebo in unresectable stage III EGFRm NSCLC without progression during/following chemoradiotherapy (CRT). CNS efficacy and time to death or distant metastases (TTDM) analyses are reported here. Patients without progression during/following definitive platinum-based CRT were randomised 2 : 1 to receive osimertinib (80 mg daily) or placebo until progression [by blinded independent central review (BICR)] or discontinuation. The primary endpoint was PFS by BICR. CNS PFS by neuroradiologist BICR and TTDM by BICR were secondary endpoints. Overall, 216 patients were randomised (143 osimertinib, 73 placebo). Median CNS PFS by neuroradiologist BICR was not reached [95% confidence interval (CI) not calculable (NC)-NC] with osimertinib versus 14.9 months (95% CI 7.4 months-NC) with placebo; hazard ratio (HR) for CNS PFS: 0.17 (95% CI 0.09-0.32). CNS PFS analysis by investigator assessment was consistent with BICR assessment. The cumulative incidence of CNS progression at 12 months was 9% (95% CI 5% to 14%) with osimertinib and 36% (95% CI 24% to 47%) with placebo. There was clinically meaningful improvement in TTDM with osimertinib versus placebo; HR for TTDM: 0.21 (95% CI 0.11-0.38). The cumulative incidence of distant metastases at 12 months was 11% (95% CI 6% to 17%) with osimertinib and 37% (95% CI 26% to 48%) with placebo. Osimertinib demonstrated clinically meaningful improvements in CNS PFS and TTDM versus placebo, supporting osimertinib post-CRT as the standard of care in unresectable stage III EGFRm NSCLC.

A Phase II Placebo-Controlled Study of the Effect and Safety of Nanvuranlat in Patients with Advanced Biliary Tract Cancers Previously Treated by Systemic Chemotherapy.

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of nanvuranlat [an L-type amino acid transporter 1 inhibitor] monotherapy as a later-line treatment in advanced, metastatic, and refractory biliary tract cancers. A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase II study was conducted across fourteen leading Japanese cancer centers and hospitals. Nanvuranlat 25 mg/m2/day or placebo was given intravenously in cycles of 5 consecutive days, followed by 9 days off. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included overall survival and disease control rate. Subgroup analysis was performed in patients with high L-type amino acid transporter 1 expression and biliary tract cancer subtypes. A total of 211 patients were screened, of which 105 eligible patients were randomized. Among these, 70 received nanvuranlat and 35 received placebo. Nanvuranlat demonstrated an improvement in PFS when compared with placebo (HR, 0.56; 95% confidence interval, 0.34-0.90; P = 0.02). Grade 3 or higher adverse events were reported in 30.0% and 22.9% of those in the nanvuranlat and placebo groups, respectively. The overall survival was not statistically different between nanvuranlat- and placebo-treated patients. An exploratory analysis indicated that nanvuranlat is warranted to evaluate its long-term clinical benefit in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, and gallbladder cancer. Compared with placebo, nanvuranlat improved PFS in patients with advanced and refractory biliary tract cancer with an acceptable safety profile. Further studies of this promising compound are warranted in the population of patients who are exhausted from treatment options.

Datopotamab Deruxtecan Versus Chemotherapy in Previously Treated Inoperable/Metastatic Hormone Receptor-Positive Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Negative Breast Cancer: Primary Results From TROPION-Breast01.

The global, phase 3, open-label, randomized TROPION-Breast01 study assessed the trophoblast cell surface antigen 2-directed antibody-drug conjugate datopotamab deruxtecan (Dato-DXd) versus investigator's choice of chemotherapy (ICC) in hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HR+/HER2-) breast cancer. Adult patients with inoperable/metastatic HR+/HER2‒ breast cancer, who had disease progression on endocrine therapy, for whom endocrine therapy was unsuitable, and had received one to two previous lines of chemotherapy in the inoperable/metastatic setting, were randomly assigned 1:1 to Dato-DXd (6 mg/kg once every 3 weeks) or ICC (eribulin/vinorelbine/capecitabine/gemcitabine). Dual primary end points were progression-free survival (PFS) by blinded independent central review (BICR) and overall survival (OS). Patients were randomly assigned to Dato-DXd (n = 365) or ICC (n = 367). Dato-DXd significantly reduced the risk of progression or death versus ICC (PFS by BICR hazard ratio [HR], 0.63 [95% CI, 0.52 to 0.76]; P < .0001). Consistent PFS benefit was observed across subgroups. Although OS data were not mature, a trend favoring Dato-DXd was observed (HR, 0.84 [95% CI, 0.62 to 1.14]). The rate of grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) with Dato-DXd was lower than ICC (20.8% v 44.7%). The most common TRAEs (any grade; grade ≥3) were nausea (51.1%; 1.4%) and stomatitis (50%; 6.4%) with Dato-DXd and neutropenia (grouped term, 42.5%; 30.8%) with ICC. Patients receiving Dato-DXd had statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in PFS and a favorable and manageable safety profile, compared with ICC. Results support Dato-DXd as a novel treatment option for patients with inoperable/metastatic HR+/HER2‒ breast cancer who have received one to two previous lines of chemotherapy in this setting.