Improvement In OS Research Articles

CTNI-59. TUMOUR VOLUMES PREDICT PROGNOSIS AND RESPONSE TO TREATMENT WITH DEPATUXIZUMAB MAFADOTIN

Abstract BACKGROUND Preclinical data demonstrates that tumor volumes predicted response to the anti-EGFR ADC Depatuxizumab mafadotin (Depatux-M) because of reduced drug delivery in large tumors. We investigated the impact of tumor volumes on outcomes with Depatux-M in the EORTC randomized phase 2 Intellance 2 study on recurrent glioblastoma (NeuroOncol 22(5):684). METHODS 260 patients were randomized to Depatux-M, Depatux-M with temozolomide, or control treatment (lomustine/temozolomide). Manual segmentation of enhancing tumor on baseline MRI scans was performed and compared with OS and PFS using SPSS Version 29.0: Kaplan-Meier survival analysis including log rank test and Cox regression analyses; categorical data were compared with Fishers’ exact test; correlation between 2D and 3D measurements with Pearson’s correlation. RESULTS MRI scans and data from 240/260 (92%) patients were available. Firstly, we confirmed that tumor volumes were a significant prognostic variable. Significant differences were seen in OS between the 0-20 vs 20-40 ml groups (321 vs 216 days, p<0.001) and between the 20-40ml vs 40+ groups (216 vs 150 days, p<0.001) with corresponding differences in PFS. Tumor volumes were also predictive of benefit from Depatux-M, with only patients with smaller tumors benefiting from Depatux-M. Patients in the 0-20 ml and 20-40 ml group group had superior OS when treated with Depatux-M compared to controls (356 vs 309 days, p=0.011 and 229 vs 178 days, p=0.028 respectively). Conversely, the 40 ml + group had no benefit (146 vs 152 days, p=0.875) as predicted. The benefit was maximal in the combination arm, with OS improvement in the 0-20 ml group (437 vs 309 days, p=0.007) and 20-40ml groups (225 vs 178 days, p=0.009). The impact of tumor volumes was confirmed in multi-variate analysis and superior to similar analysis with 2D RANO measurements. CONCLUSIONS Tumor volumes are an important prognostic variable in recurrent glioblastoma and modulate survival to large molecules like Depatux-M.

QLTI-04. UPDATE ON HIGH-GRADE GLIOMA PATIENTS TREATED WITH TTFIELDS FROM NANFANG HOSPITAL IN CHINA

Abstract OBJECTIVE Tumour-treating fields (TTFields) have changed the first-line clinical practice of glioblastoma worldwide due to their promising therapeutic efficacy. The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical efficacy of TTFields therapy for HGG in Nanfang Hospital, China. In 2023 ASNO we reported PFS.Now we reporte update about OS from our single center study. METHODS From January 2019 to December 2022, a total of 25 patients with newly diagnosed HGG (ndHGG) treated with TTFields were retrospectively included in our study. Among these patients, 9 patients received concurrent radiochemotherapy in combination with TTFields and 16 patients received non-concurrent chemoradiotherapy in combination with TTFields. The primary endpoint of the study was mPFS and mOS (Kaplan-Meier method used to estimate PFS and OS survival curves). Secondary endpoint was the influences about KPS score in PFS and OS. RESULTS The 25 ndHGG patients treated with TTFields included nine males and sixteen females with a mean age of 47.1 years (12-68). Gross total resection (GTR) was performed in eighteen patients. Twenty-one patients were IDH wild type, eleven patients showed methylation of the MGMT promoter. Followed up until January 2024, the median PFS was 13.3 months [95% CI: 11.33-15.2] with TTFields combined and 4.0 months (95% CI, 3.8-4.4) without TTFields treatment in EF-14.Median OS was 26.53 months [95% CI:19.47-33.57] with TTFields and 16.0 months (95% CI, 3.8-4.4) control in EF-14. In the KPS stratification, OS was 27.5 months (95% CI: 22.95-32.1) vs 4.3 months (95% CI: 0-11.2), p=0.0001. The OS of patients with concurrent chemoradiotherapy combined with TTFields vs. without concurrent chemoradiotherapy combined with TTFields was 26.5 months (95% CI: 24.33-28.7) vs 21.2 (95% CI: 3.1-39.3) months, p=0.59. CONCLUSIONS TTFields therapy is an effective treatment for HGG. In this study the addition of TTFields resulted in a statistically significant improvement in PFS and OS.

Long-term real-world evidence of CPX-351 of high-risk AML patients identified high rate of negative MRD and prolonged OS

CPX-351 has been approved for patients with therapy-related acute myeloid leukemia (t-AML) or AML with myelodysplasia-related changes (MRC-AML). No extensive data are available on MRD and long-term clinical outcome using CPX-351 in AML in real-life. We retrospectively collected data from 168 patients in 36 centers in France and Italy who had received one or two cycles of induction with CPX-351. All patients were older than 18 years and had newly diagnosed, untreated t-AML or MRC-AML. With a median follow-up of 3 years, median OS was 13.3 months. Median OS was 20.4 months vs. 12.9 months for patients with MRD below or above 10-3, respectively (p=0.006). In a multivariate analysis, only MRD >10-3 was associated with a poorer OS (hazard ratio [HR]=2.6, 95% CI 1.2-5.5, p=0.013). We also observed a trend towards a better median OS in patients who underwent HSCT with MRD <10-3 (not reached vs. 26.0 months, p=0.06). Achievement of MRD negativity contributed to the improvement of OS in the overall population and, maybe, in transplanted patients. These data provide the rationale for the two ongoing studies evaluating CPX-351 vs. 7+3 in non-MRC-AML and non-t-AML using MRD as the primary endpoint for ALFA-2101 phase II clinical trial and event-free survival for AMLSG 30-18 phase III clinical trial. Funding: Any

A meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized controlled trials in combination gemcitabine with erlotinib in the pancreatic cancer.

Previous studies have demonstrated the efficacy and safety of combining gemcitabine and erlotinib (Gem-Erlo) for the treatment of pancreatic cancer (PaC). However, there is a limited number of clinical studies and multiple prospective randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have yielded inconsistent conclusions. The question of whether Gem-Erlo has significant advantages over conventional chemotherapy in the treatment of PaC has been controversial. In order to provide valuable insights for PaC treatment, this study conducted a meta-analysis based on the current evidence from RCTs. We searched several databases including PubMed/Medline, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Embase, as well as relevant conference abstracts from the beginning of their inception to July 2023. We used the patient/population, intervention, comparison, outcomes and study design (PICOS) principle to screen the literature. After title, abstract and full text filtering, we extract the data from each study to assess the risk of bias by examining the quality of the literature. We used a meta-analysis with random effects model to synthesize and summarize the results regarding objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), median progression-free survival (median PFS), median overall survival (median OS) and 1-year survival rate. Seven RCTs were included, involving 2,152 PaC patients treated with either Gem-Erlo or gemcitabine alone. The results showed that Gem-Erlo significantly improved DCR [odds ratio (OR) =1.74; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.03 to 2.92; P=0.04]; but did not significantly improve median OS [standardized mean difference (SMD) =-0.20; 95% CI: -1.46 to 1.06; P=0.75], median PFS (SMD =-0.97; 95% CI: -4.01 to 2.07; P=0.53), ORR (OR =1.29; 95% CI: 0.84 to 1.97), or 1-year survival rate (OR =1.18; 95% CI: 0.88 to 1.57). In addition, sensitivity analysis of the median OS showed the Gem-Erlo group significantly prolonged the median OS compared to the gemcitabine alone group [weighted mean difference (WMD) =-1.74; 95% CI: -1.87 to -1.62; P<0.001]. The most common adverse events (AEs) were rash, diarrhea, fatigue, neutropenia and thrombocytopenia in both groups, but the Gem-Erlo group is more often than the gemcitabine alone (OR =1.40, 95% CI: 1.19 to 1.65; P<0.001), and all AEs were within the acceptable range for patients. Gem-Erlo can improve DCR when compared to gemcitabine. There was no statistically significant improvement in median PFS, median OS, ORR and 1-year survival rate. However, sensitivity analysis showed a statistical difference in the median OS. Our study indicated that Gem-Erlo had better efficacy than gemcitabine alone in PaC therapy. The occurrence of AEs is under the acceptable range for patients.

Chronic Ocular GVHD Treatment at Two Locations of a Tertiary Referral Center.

To compare baseline characteristics and treatment of chronic ocular graft-versus-host disease (oGVHD) patients in two treatment locations. Patients diagnosed with definite chronic oGVHD between September 1, 2014 and September 20, 2021 at two locations were identified. IRB-approved retrospective chart review was conducted for the following data: demographic information, ocular surface disease index (OSDI), corneal fluorescein staining (CFS), and treatment(s) used. Differences by site were assessed using Pearson's Chi-Square tests and two-sample t-tests; differences by time were assessed using paired t-tests. At baseline, Clinic 1 (C1) patients had a worse mean OSDI score (47.8 vs 36.3, p = 0.011) and CFS in both OD (1.3 vs 0.8, p = 0.005) and OS (1.3 vs 0.6, p < 0.001) compared to Clinic 2 (C2). Comparing baseline to endpoint, C1 patients experienced an improvement in OSDI (-17.26, p < 0.001), CFS OD (-0.50, p < 0.001), and CFS OS (-0.51, p < 0.001) at C1. Change in OSDI, CFS OD, or CFS OS was not statistically significant at C2. Despite similar follow-up length, C1 demonstrated more clinic visits (10.4 vs 3.4, p < 0.001) and more treatment trials (4.9 vs 2.4, p < 0.001) compared to C2. Punctal plugs (85.5% vs 61.2%, p = 0.002), punctal cautery (69.7% vs 28.6%, p < 0.001), topical steroids (72.4% vs 22.4%, p < 0.001), and autologous serum tears (AST) (52.6% vs 8.2%, p < 0.001) were used more frequently at C1 than at C2. oGVHD patients at C1 experienced significant improvement in OSDI and corneal fluorescein staining and compared to patients at C2, had more frequent follow-up and use of punctal plugs, punctal cautery, topical steroids, and AST.

Prognostic implications of margin status in association with systemic treatment in a cohort study of patients with resection of colorectal liver metastases.

This study investigates the impact of margin status after colorectal liver metastasis (CLM) resection on outcomes of patients after neoadjuvant treatment versus those who underwent upfront resection. An international collaborative database of CLM patients who underwent surgical resection was used. Proportional hazard regression models were created for single and multivariable models to assess the relationship between independent measures and median overall survival (mOS). R1 was associated with worse OS in the neoadjuvant group (mOS: 51.8 m for R0 vs. 26.0 m for R1; HR: 2.18). In the patients who underwent upfront surgery, R1 was not associated with OS. (mOS: 46.7 m for R0 vs. 42.6 m for R1). When patients with R1 in each group were stratified by adjuvant treatment, there was no significant difference in the neoadjuvant group, while in the upfront surgery group with R1, adjuvant treatment was associated with significant improvement in OS (mOS: 42.6 m for adjuvant vs. 25.0 m for no adjuvant treatment; HR: 0.21). R1 is associated with worse outcomes in the patients who receive neoadjuvant treatment with no significant improvement with the addition of adjuvant therapy, likely representing an aggressive tumor biology. R1 did not impact OS in patients with upfront surgery who received postoperative chemotherapy.

Efficacy, safety, and patient-reported outcome of immune checkpoint inhibitor in gynecologic cancers: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Over the past decades, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have shown dramatic efficacy in improving survival rates in multiple malignancies. Recently, gynecological cancer patients also showed to respond favorably to ICI treatment. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and patient-reported outcomes of ICI therapy in gynecological cancers. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis by retrieving literature from multiple electronic databases, such as MEDLINE, ScienceDirect, EBSCO, ProQuest, and Google Scholar. The protocol used in this study has been registered in PROSPERO (CRD42022369529). We included a total of 12 trials involving 8 therapies and 8,034 patients. ICI group demonstrated a longer OS (HR: 0.807; 95% CI: 0.719, 0.907; p = 0.000) and greater PFS improvement (HR: 0.809; 95% CI: 0.673, 0.973; p = 0.024) compared to the control group. There was no significant difference in the incidence of treatment-related adverse events [RR: 0.968; 95%CI: 0.936, 1.001; p = 0.061], but a higher incidence of immune-related adverse events (IRAEs) was observed in the ICI group (RR: 3.093; 95%CI: 1.933, 4.798; p = 0.000). Although the mean changes of QOL score from baseline was not significantly different between both groups (SMD: 0.048; 95% CI: -0.106, 0.202; p = 0.542), the time to definitive QOL deterioration was longer in the ICI group (HR: 0.508; 95% CI: 0.461, 0.560; p = 0.000). Despite having a higher incidence of IRAE, ICI was shown to improve survival rates and QOL of patients. Thus, it should be considered as a new standard of care for gynecologic cancers, especially in advanced stages.

Vasorin (VASN) overexpression promotes pulmonary metastasis and resistance to adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer

BackgroundLARC patients commonly receive adjuvant therapy, however, hidden micrometastases still limit the improvement of OS. This study aims to investigate the impact of VASN in rectal cancer with pulmonary metastasis and understand the underlying molecular mechanisms to guide adjuvant chemotherapy selection.MethodsSequencing data from rectal cancer patients with pulmonary metastasis from Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center (SYSUCC) and publicly available data were meticulously analyzed. The functional role of VASN in pulmonary metastasis was validated in vivo and in vitro. Coimmunoprecipitation (co-IP), immunofluorescence, and rescue experiments were conducted to unravel potential molecular mechanisms of VASN. Moreover, VASN expression levels in tumor samples were examined and analyzed for their correlations with pulmonary metastasis status, tumor stage, adjuvant chemotherapy benefit, and survival outcome.ResultsOur study revealed a significant association between high VASN expression and pulmonary metastasis in LARC patients. Experiments in vitro and in vivo demonstrated that VASN could promote the cell proliferation, metastasis, and drug resistance of colorectal cancer. Mechanistically, VASN interacts with the NOTCH1 protein, leading to concurrent activation of the NOTCH and MAPK pathways. Clinically, pulmonary metastasis and advanced tumor stage were observed in 90% of VASN-positive patients and 53.5% of VASN-high patients, respectively, and VASN-high patients had a lower five-year survival rate than VASN-low patients (26.7% vs. 83.7%). Moreover, the Cox analysis and OS analysis indicated that VASN was an independent prognostic factor for OS (HR = 7.4, P value < 0.001) and a predictor of adjuvant therapy efficacy in rectal cancer.ConclusionsOur study highlights the role of VASN in decreasing drug sensitivity and activating the NOTCH and MAPK pathways, which leads to tumorigenesis and pulmonary metastasis. Both experimental and clinical data support that rectal cancer patients with VASN overexpression detected in biopsies have a higher risk of pulmonary metastasis and adjuvant chemotherapy resistance.

Impact of Positive Resection Margins on Recurrence and Survival Following Resection and Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Pancreatic Cancer: Results of the PRODIGE 24-CCTG PA-6 Randomized Controlled Trial.

This study investigated the correlation between positive resection margins and outcomes in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma who underwent surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy according to the pivotal trial PRODIGE 24-CCTG PA-6. The primary focus is on elucidating the prognostic significance of specific resection margins, including those associated with the superior-mesenteric vein (SMV), medial, and posterior pancreas. The analysis involved 400 patients across multiple centers in France and Canada. Surgical resection and subsequent adjuvant chemotherapy were core interventions. This study assessed the prognostic impact of resection margins, highlighting the significance of standardized pathology assessments. Additionally, the influence of chemotherapy regimen choice, comparing gemcitabine to mFOLFIRINOX, on the implications of positive resection margins was examined. Only three margins, SMV (HR=1.48 95% CI [1.11;1.96], P<.001), medial (HR=1.92 95% CI [1.36;2.73], P<.001) and posterior (HR=1.65 95% CI [1.21;2.24], P=.002), had a significant prognostic impact on disease-free survival and were sufficient compared with the seven recommended margins (Kappa=0.90 95% CI [0.87; 0.94]). R1 status was significant independent prognostic factor for poorer survival in gemcitabine-treasted patients (HR=1.97 95% CI [1.23;3.16], P=.005) but lost its significance with mFOLFIRINOX (HR=1.46 95% CI [0.91;2.35], P=.114). All efforts should be made to evaluate the three margins of the highest prognostic value, with the others being secondary. A key finding of this study is the likely effect of mFOLFIRINOX on local invasion in operated patients, which seems to correct the impairment related to margin involvement, probably explaining the improvements in DFS and OS.

TRLS-03. A PHASE 1/2 STUDY ASSESSING SAFETY AND PHARMACOKINETICS OF CEMIPLIMAB IN PEDIATRIC PATIENTS WITH RELAPSED OR REFRACTORY SOLID OR CENTRAL-NERVOUS-SYSTEM TUMORS AND SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF CEMIPLIMAB IN COMBINATION WITH RADIOTHERAPY IN PATIENTS WITH NEWLY DIAGNOSED DIFFUSE INTRINSIC PONTINE GLIOMA, NEWLY DIAGNOSED HIGH-GRADE GLIOMA, OR RECURRENT HIGH-GRADE GLIOMA

Abstract BACKGROUND We investigated, for the first time, combination PD-1 inhibition (cemiplimab) and radiation therapy (RT) followed by cemiplimab monotherapy in children with solid tumors, diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG) and high-grade glioma (HGG). METHODS We conducted a multicenter study through the Pediatric Neuro-Oncology Consortium. Phase 1 established the safety/pharmacokinetics of cemiplimab monotherapy in children (&amp;lt;18 years) with recurrent solid and central-nervous-system (CNS) tumors. Phase 2 evaluated cemiplimab/RT in children and young adults (3-25 years) with newly diagnosed (nd) DIPG, ndHGG or recurrent HGG (rHGG). Patients with ndDIPG and ndHGG were randomized to hypofractionated RT (hfRT) or conventionally fractionated RT (cRT). Primary endpoints included overall survival at 12 months (OS12) for ndDIPG and rHGG and progression-free survival at 12 months (PFS12) for ndHGG. Correlates included quality-of-life, circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), immunogenicity, and PD-1 pathway components. RESULTS 25 patients (solid tumors, n=8; CNS tumors, n=17) were treated in phase 1; serum drug concentrations were comparable to adults. 32 patients were treated in phase 2. OS12 was 33.3% for ndDIPG treated with cemiplimab/hfRT (n=6), 0.0% for ndDIPG with cemiplimab/cRT (n=5), and 31.3% for rHGG (n=9). PFS12 was not estimable for ndHGG treated with cemiplimab/hfRT (n=5) and 20.0% for ndHGG treated with cemiplimab/cRT (n=7). 20 patients (35.1%) had grade 3/4 treatment-related AEs (TRAEs) and 13 (22.8%) had serious TRAEs. The most frequent grade 3/4 TRAE was decreased lymphocyte count (n=4 [7.0%]). 12 patients (21.1%) demonstrated treatment-emergent pseudo-progression, 2 (3.5%) grade 3/4. The most frequent serious TRAE was pseudo-progression (n=3 [5.3%]). CONCLUSIONS Cemiplimab/RT did not demonstrate an improvement in OS (ndDIPG and rHGG) or PFS (ndHGG), leading to early stopping for futility. However, the combination was tolerable, demonstrated similar outcomes across RT schedules, and showed similar exposure in serum compared to adults. Biologic and clinical correlate analyses are underway.

Phase 3 randomized study for evaluation of physician choice Rx versus best supportive care as second-line or beyond therapy in head and neck cancer with poor performance status.

LBA6019 Background: Relapsed-recurrent head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) cancers have limited treatment options in the second line and beyond setting. Many of these patients have poor performance status (PS) and are subject to best supportive care (BSC). There is a lack of any level 1 evidence about the benefit of systemic therapy in HNSCC with poor PS. Methods: This was a randomized phase 3 superiority open-label multicentric study. Adult patients (age&gt;=18 years) with relapsed-recurrent HNSCC, qualified to receive 2nd line or beyond systemic palliative therapy and had ECOG PS 2-3 were eligible. Such patients underwent central stratified random assignment 2:1 to either physician choice therapy either triple metronomic chemotherapy (tablet erlotinib 150 mg [fixed-dose] OD, capsule celecoxib 200 mg [fixed-dose] BD, and oral weekly methotrexate 9 mg/m2 orally or intravenous docetaxel [75 mg/m2 3 weekly]) or BSC. The chemotherapy was continued either till the progression of the disease or till the development of intolerable side effects. The primary endpoint was 6 month-overall survival (OS). The OS in the 2 arms was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and by log-rank test. A p-value of 0.05 was considered significant. Sample size: The 6-month OS assumed based on our previous data was 20%, we had assumed that it would increase to 50% in the intervention arm with a type 1 error of 5%, type 2 error of 20%, 2:1 allocation (1- BSC and 2- intervention) and 10% lost to follow up rate. The sample size required was 66. The events required for analysis were 47. Results: The study recruited 66 patients between 1st September 2022 to 27th December 2022 with 44 patients in physician choice therapy (PCT) and 22 in the BSC arm. The data was censored for analysis on 1st March 2024. The median age was 50 years (Range 25-75) with a predominantly male population (n=53;85%). The ECOG PS was PS 2 in 56 (84.8%) and PS 3 in 10 (15.2%) patients. The predominant site of primary was the oral cavity with 52 patients (78.8%). The previous number of systemic lines of therapy received were 1 in 41 (62.1%), 2 in 22 (33.3%), and &gt;2 in 3 (4.5%) patients. Except for 2, all patients had a platinum refractory status (64;97%). The PCT was triple metronomic chemotherapy in 41 patients (93.2%; n=44) and docetaxel in 3 patients (6.8%; n=44). The 6-month OS was 9.09% (95% CI 1.56-25.1) in the BSC versus 53.8% (95% CI 37.9-67.2) in the PCT arm (P&lt;0.0001). The median overall survival in PCT was 223.0 days (95% CI 129-283) versus 77.5 days (95%CI 58 -110) in the BSC arm. The corresponding hazard ratio was 0.333 (95%CI 0.187-0.593; P&lt;0.0001). The data regarding adverse events will be presented at the conference. Conclusions: In this first-ever randomized study on poor PS HNSCC patients, warranting second-line and beyond therapy, the administration of systemic therapy led to a substantial improvement in OS. Clinical trial information: CTRI/2022/08/044733 .

ADRIATIC: Durvalumab (D) as consolidation treatment (tx) for patients (pts) with limited-stage small-cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC).

LBA5 Background: The standard of care (SoC) for pts with LS-SCLC is concurrent platinum-based chemoradiotherapy (cCRT) ± prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI). ADRIATIC (NCT03703297), a phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo (PBO)-controlled, multicenter, global study, assessed D ± tremelimumab (T) as consolidation tx for pts with LS-SCLC who had not progressed after cCRT. Here we report results for D vs PBO from the first planned interim analysis (IA). Methods: Eligible pts had stage I–III LS-SCLC (stage I/II inoperable) and WHO performance status 0/1, and had not progressed after cCRT. PCI was permitted before randomization. Pts were randomized 1–42 days after cCRT to D 1500 mg + PBO, D 1500 mg + T 75 mg, or PBO + PBO every 4 weeks (Q4W) for 4 cycles, followed by D (D±T arms) or PBO Q4W until investigator-determined progression or intolerable toxicity, or for a maximum of 24 months (mo). The first 600 pts were randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio; subsequent pts were randomly assigned 1:1 to D or PBO. Randomization was stratified by stage (I/II vs III) and receipt of PCI (yes vs no). The dual primary endpoints were OS and PFS (blinded independent central review per RECIST v1.1) for D vs PBO. OS and PFS for D+T vs PBO were alpha-controlled secondary endpoints. Results: 730 pts were randomized, including 264 to D and 266 to PBO. Baseline characteristics and prior tx were well balanced between arms. Radiation schedule in the D vs PBO arms was once daily in 73.9% vs 70.3% of pts and twice daily in 26.1% vs 29.7%; 53.8% of pts in each arm received PCI. At this IA (data cutoff 15Jan2024), median (range) duration of follow-up for OS and PFS in censored pts was 37.2 (0.1–60.9) and 27.6 (0.0–55.8) mo, respectively. OS was significantly improved with D vs PBO (HR 0.73 [95% CI 0.57–0.93]; p=0.0104; median OS 55.9 [95% CI 37.3 – not estimable] vs 33.4 [25.5–39.9] mo; 24-mo OS rate 68.0% vs 58.5%; 36-mo OS rate 56.5% vs 47.6%). PFS was also significantly improved with D vs PBO (HR 0.76 [95% CI 0.61–0.95]; p=0.0161; median PFS 16.6 [95% CI 10.2–28.2] vs 9.2 [7.4–12.9] mo; 18-mo PFS rate 48.8% vs 36.1%; 24-mo PFS rate 46.2% vs 34.2%). Tx benefit was generally consistent across predefined pt subgroups for both OS and PFS. With D vs PBO, maximum grade 3/4 all-cause adverse events (AEs) occurred in 24.3% vs 24.2% of pts; AEs led to tx discontinuation in 16.3% vs 10.6% of pts and to death in 2.7% vs 1.9%. Any-grade pneumonitis/radiation pneumonitis was reported in 38.0% vs 30.2% of pts with D vs PBO (maximum grade 3/4 in 3.0% vs 2.6%). The D+T arm remains blinded until the next planned analysis. Conclusions: D as consolidation tx after cCRT demonstrated a statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in OS and PFS compared with PBO in pts with LS-SCLC. D was well tolerated and AEs were consistent with the known safety profile, with no new signals observed. These data support consolidation D as a new SoC for pts with LS-SCLC who have not progressed after cCRT. Clinical trial information: NCT03703297 .

Long term results of a randomized phase III study of nimotuzumab in combination with concurrent radiotherapy and cisplatin versus radiotherapy and cisplatin alone, in locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

LBA6092 Background: The addition of nimotuzumab to weekly cisplatin as a radiosensitizer had improved progression-free survival (PFS) in a phase 3 study in locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (LA HNSCC). However, whether it leads to an improvement in long-term OS is unknown. Hence this analysis was performed to evaluate the efficacy (in terms of OS) and late-term adverse events of the addition of nimotuzumab to concurrent chemoradiation in LA HNSCC. Methods: This was an open-label, investigator-initiated, phase 3 randomized trial conducted from 2012 - 2018. 536 adult patients with LA HNSCC, fit for radical chemoradiation were randomly assigned. Primary sites in the nasopharynx, salivary gland, nasal cavity, and paranasal sinus were excluded. Randomized 1:1 to either radical radiotherapy (66-70 Gy) with concurrent weekly cisplatin (30 mg/m2) (CRT) or the same schedule of chemoradiation with weekly nimotuzumab (200 mg) (NCRT). The primary endpoint was a 10-year OS; the key secondary endpoint was late adverse events. Intent to treat analysis was performed. OS was defined as the time from randomization till death. Kaplan Meier method will be used for the estimation of OS. Landmark analysis was performed to compare 10 OS between the 2 arms. COX proportional hazard model will be used for the calculation of hazard ratio (HR). The adverse events between the 2 arms were compared using a Fisher's test. A p-value of 0.05 will be considered as significant. Results: The median follow-up was 8.86 years (95% CI 8.59-9.16). The primary site of the primary was the oropharynx (269,50.2%) and only 24 cases were HPV positive. The 10-year OS was 22.5% (95% CI 16.7-28.8) versus 33.5% (95% CI 27.6-39.4) in the CRT and NCRT arm respectively (Hazard ratio=0.811; 95%CI 0.664-0.995, P=0.044). The median OS was 2.78 years (95% CI 2.31-3.69) versus 3.69 years (95% CI 2.90-4.49) in the CRT and NCRT arm respectively (P value by log-rank test=0.04). The median OS in HPV negative oropharynx was 1.8 years (95% CI 1.51-2.09) versus 2.48 years (95% CI 1.79-3.16) in the CRT and NCRT arm respectively (P value by log-rank test=0.02; HR 0.724 95%CI 0.546-0.959). Long-term adverse events were captured in 380 patients. There was no statistically significant difference in late-term adverse events between the 2 arms and will be presented at the conference. Conclusions: The addition of nimotuzumab to weekly cisplatin leads to improvement in long-term overall survival in locally advanced HNSCC without any additional increase in late-term adverse events. These results are largely applicable in HPV-negative patients. Clinical trial information: CTRI/2014/09/004980 .

Three-year follow-up data from KEYNOTE-966: Pembrolizumab (pembro) plus gemcitabine and cisplatin (gem/cis) compared with gem/cis alone for patients (pts) with advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC).

4093 Background: KEYNOTE-966 demonstrated that adding pembro to gem/cis provided a statistically significant, clinically meaningful improvement in OS as first-line therapy for BTC. After a median follow-up (ie, time from randomization to data cutoff) of 25.6 months (mo), median OS was 12.7 mo for pembro + gem/cis vs 10.9 mo with placebo + gem/cis (hazard ratio [HR] 0.83, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.72-0.95; P = 0.0034; data cutoff date December 15, 2022). We present updated efficacy and safety data after 11 mo of additional follow-up. Methods: Key eligibility criteria included age ≥18 years; previously untreated, histologically confirmed metastatic or unresectable locally advanced BTC measurable by RECIST v1.1; and ECOG PS 0 or 1. Pts were randomized 1:1 to pembro 200 mg or placebo Q3W for ≤35 cycles plus gem 1000 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 Q3W until PD and cis 25 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 for &lt;8 cycles.Pts were stratified by region (Asia vs non-Asia), stage (locally advanced vs metastatic), and site of origin (gallbladder vs intrahepatic vs extrahepatic). The primary end point was OS; secondary end points were PFS, ORR, and DOR assessed per RECIST v1.1 by blinded independent central review, and safety. The data cutoff date for this analysis was November 14, 2023. Results: 1069 pts were randomized to pembro + gem/cis (n = 533) or placebo + gem/cis (n = 536). At a median follow-up of 36.6 mo (range, 29.2-49.4), the OS benefit of pembro + gem/cis was maintained (HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.75-0.98). Median OS was 12.7 mo (95% CI 11.5-13.6) for the pembro arm vs 10.9 mo (95% CI 9.9-11.6) for the placebo arm. At 24 mo, the OS rate was 24.6% (95% CI 21.0-28.3) in the pembro arm vs 19.2% (95% CI 16.0-22.6) in the placebo arm. OS in key subgroups continued to favor the pembro arm. Median PFS was 6.5 mo (95% CI 5.7-6.9) for the placebo arm vs 5.6 mo (95% CI 4.9-6.5) for the pembro arm (HR 0.85, 95% CI 0.75-0.97). ORR was 28.7% (n = 153) in the pembro arm vs 28.7% (n = 154) in the placebo arm. DOR was 8.3 mo (range: 1.2+ to 44.3+) for the pembro arm vs 6.9 mo (1.1+ to 41.1+) for the placebo arm; at 18 mo, estimates of ongoing response were 24% in the pembro arm vs 14% in the placebo arm. 378 (71.5%) out of 529 treated pts in the pembro arm had grade 3-5 treatment-related adverse events (AEs) vs 370 (69.3%) out of 534 treated pts in the placebo arm. 31 (5.9%) pts in the pembro arm died vs 50 (9.4%) in the placebo arm. There were no additional treatment-related deaths since the final analysis. Conclusions: With a median follow-up of 36.6 mo, the clinically meaningful improvement in OS with pembro + gem/cis was maintained, with no new safety signals, compared with placebo + gem/cis in pts with unresectable or advanced BTC. These data support pembro + gem/cis as first-line treatment for advanced BTC.

The impact of metformin on clinical outcomes of metastatic colorectal cancer with known molecular profile treated with cytotoxic chemotherapy or immune checkpoint inhibitor.

e15580 Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer in the US, with a dismal 5-year OS of 13% in mCRC. Concomitant metformin with chemotherapy or immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) revealed improved outcomes in various cancers. Metformin's anti-cancer effects stem its effects on cancer metabolism, cell cycle modulation, cancer stem cells, gut microbiota, immunomodulatory properties. The aim of this retrospective study was to study the impact of concomitant metformin use with the type of systemic therapy (chemotherapy or ICIs) in CRC. Methods: CRC tumors were analyzed by NGS of DNA (592-gene) and RNA (whole transcriptome) at Caris Life Sciences. MSS was assessed by NGS, with MSI-H and MSS patients subcategorized by concomitant metformin use with ICI or with chemotherapy, respectively. Real-world OS, derived from insurance claims data, was calculated from the time of CRC sample collection to the last contact. Hazard ratio (HR) was calculated using the Cox proportional hazards model, with p values calculated using the log-rank test. Results: The study cohort included 31,083 CRC cases (male: female = 1.2, age: 80% &gt; = 50 years). Common molecular alterations included TP53 (73.6%), APC (77.6%), KRAS (47.4%), CTNNB1 (2.0%), and HER2 amplification (1.7%). 1,503 patients were MSI-H (4.83%), 21,330 as MSS (68.6%), and 8,250 indeterminate. MSI-H patients receiving concurrent ICI/metformin had similar OS (52.7 vs. 55.4 months, HR = 0.78, 95% CI: 0.41 – 1.51, p = 0.462). Conversely, OS was increased in MSS patients on concomitant chemotherapy and metformin (38.1 vs 31.1 months, HR = 0.77, 95% CI: 0.69 – 0.86, p &lt; 0.00001). In comparing real-world OS between left-sided and right-sided colorectal cancer (CRC), regardless of metformin use, multivariate analysis incorporating molecular alterations revealed longer OS for left-sided MSS CRC compared to right-sided (HR = 0.80, 95% CI: 0.76 – 0.84, p &lt; 0.00001). However, further improvement in OS was associated with concurrent metformin use in both right-sided and left-sided tumors. Conclusions: In this retrospective analysis of real-world clinical outcomes, patients receiving concomitant metformin and cytotoxic chemotherapy had improved clinical outcomes in MSS CRC compared to those not on concurrent metformin. However, the concurrent use of metformin with ICIs in MSI-H CRC did not show an impact on clinical outcomes given low sample size. These results add to the existing body of literature on the potential benefits of metformin in the context of MSS CRC and underscore the importance of a prospective controlled study of concurrent metformin use with systemic chemotherapy in metastatic CRC. Limitations of this study involves the potential inclusion of cases with prior metformin use, small sample size, retrospective analyses, and the lack of control for the patients with type II DM.

A randomized phase II trial of adjuvant pembrolizumab versus observation following curative resection for stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with primary tumors between 1-4 cm: Big Ten Cancer Research Consortium BTCRC-LUN18-153.

TPS8118 Background: Each year, approximately 35,000 patients are diagnosed with stage I lung cancer in the United States. Despite early detection, the 5-year overall survival for this population remains disappointing, ranging between 73-86% with recurrence rates from 18-38%. The current standard of care for stage I NSCLC is surgery alone followed by observation as prior trials of adjuvant chemotherapy in this subgroup have failed to show benefit. More modern therapies such as programmed death-1 (PD-1) inhibitors have not been evaluated in the stage I setting but have demonstrated significant improvements in pathologic complete response, event free survival, and overall survival when added to chemotherapy for patients with fully resected stage II and III disease. The use of PD-(L)1 inhibition has also demonstrated clinically and statistically significant improvements in OS in both unresectable stage III NSCLC following chemoradiation and in the metastatic setting. Given the activity of PD-(L)1 inhibition in nearly every other subset of NSCLC patients, we aimed to evaluate this therapy following resection in stage I NSCLC patients. Methods: This study is a randomized phase II multicenter trial of adjuvant Pembrolizumab versus observation alone following complete resection of stage I NSCLC with tumors between 1-4cm. The trial randomizes patients 1:1 to either Pembrolizumab 400mg IV every 6 weeks for up to 9 cycles or observation alone. Patients are stratified by PD-L1 score (PD-L1 ≥50% vs. &lt; 50%) and tumor size (1-2cm vs. &gt; 2-4cm), and they undergo repeat CT imaging every 12 weeks. The study is being conducted through the Big Ten Cancer Research Consortium, and there are currently 11 sites open to accrual with one additional site pending activation. The primary endpoint is disease free survival with secondary endpoints including OS, DFS at multiple timepoints (1-, 2-, and 3-years), and safety. The trial initially opened to accrual at the lead site, Indiana University, in May 2020, and enrollment is currently at 95 patients with a planned enrollment of 244. (NCT04317534) Clinical trial information: NCT04317534 .

Impact of exposure on outcomes with enfortumab vedotin in patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer.

4503 Background: Enfortumab vedotin (EV) is approved in combination with pembrolizumab and as a monotherapy for locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer (la/mUC). EV, alone and in combination with pembrolizumab, has demonstrated an OS benefit and a generally manageable safety profile in patients (pts) with previously treated or untreated la/mUC. Dose modifications, including reductions and interruptions, are recommended to manage EV-related AEs. This analysis evaluates the association between EV plasma exposure, which is impacted by dose modifications, and safety and efficacy outcomes. Methods: Characterization of dose- and exposure-response for efficacy and exposure-response for safety outcomes included pts in EV-101 (EV monotherapy 0.75, 1.0, and 1.25 mg/kg on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle [3Q4W]), EV-201, and EV-301 (EV monotherapy 1.25 mg/kg 3Q4W). Time-averaged exposure up to an event of interest, Cavg, was computed using a population PK model. PK assessment included multiple samples in first 2 cycles, and pre-dose samples in subsequent cycles. Results: Dose modifications were common, including dose reductions to 1.0 mg/kg (EV-201 42.1%; EV-301 35.1%) and 0.75 mg/kg (EV-201 13.6%; EV-301 11.1%). EV showed consistent improvement in median PFS and OS vs chemotherapy across all exposure quartiles in EV-301 inclusive of dose modifications (Table). Greater initial EV exposure in the first 2 cycles was associated with a higher ORR and was consistent with dose-response (0.75 mg/kg 21.4% [sample size {n} = 14]; 1.0 mg/kg 18.5% [n = 27]; 1.25 mg/kg 40-51.1% across studies [n = 613]). Lower EV exposure was associated with lower risk of EV-related Grade ≥3 rash or skin reactions, Grade ≥2 peripheral neuropathy, and Grade ≥3 hyperglycemia (P&lt;0.0001 for all). Conclusions: EV improved PFS and OS outcomes vs chemotherapy in pts with la/mUC across all exposure quartiles. The starting dose of 1.25 mg/kg 3Q4W resulted in EV exposure that maximized likelihood of response. Recommended dose modifications are effective for managing EV-related AEs and should be used as clinically indicated. Clinical trial information: NCT02091999 , NCT03219333 , and NCT03474107 . [Table: see text]

Prognostic and predictive value of ultrasensitive ctDNA monitoring in a metastatic pan-cancer cohort treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors in the context of phase 1 clinical trials.

2510 Background: Determining which patients will achieve clinical benefit from immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) therapy remains an open question. Liquid biopsy tests to assess baseline and early dynamics of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) may allow clinicians to track response more granularly and predict ICI response or resistance prior to imaging. However, lack of sensitivity may hinder accurate detection of low ctDNA levels in tumors with low shedding rates or during substantial drops and clearance in response. Methods: This study represents a cohort of 175 patients with refractory metastatic tumors from 18 different cancer types, who received 1-3 successive lines of ICI treatment in the context of phase-1 clinical trials. Thus far, 609 plasma samples from 90 stage-IV cancer patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatment have been processed. ctDNA was profiled using the NeXT Personal assay, a liquid biopsy platform that leverages whole-genome sequencing of tumor and normal samples to create custom, patient-specific panels that include up to 1,800 somatic variants. This enables the detection of molecular residual disease (MRD) down to a detection threshold of 1 part per million (PPM) of ctDNA. Results: NeXT Personal assay detected positive levels of ctDNA in 99% (81/82) of plasma baseline samples, with a wide dynamic range, extending from 4.2 PPM (~0.00042% TF) to ~640,000 PPM (~64% TF) (median limit of detection = 2 PPM, 0.0002% TF). Lower ctDNA values at baseline were correlated with increased duration of PFS (log-rank p=0.017, HR=0.57, 95% CI 0.36-0.91) and extended OS (log-rank p=0.002, HR=0.46, 95% CI 0.28-0.75). Early reduction in ctDNA level from baseline to treatment cycle 3 was associated with significant increases in PFS (log-rank p=0.001, HR=0.36, 95% CI 0.19-0.67) and OS (log-rank p=0.015, HR=0.44, 95% CI 0.22-0.87), representing a &gt;3-fold increase in both median PFS and OS. ctDNA clearance resulted in significant improvement in both PFS and OS (PFS: log-rank p=0.002, HR=0.24, 95% CI 0.09-0.62; OS: log-rank p=0.01, HR=0.29, 95% CI 0.1-0.8). All plasma timepoints from periods of durable complete response (CR) assessed via RECIST 1.1 were ctDNA-negative, with a molecular clearance lead time of 277 days over radiographically confirmed CR. Conclusions: We demonstrate that early ctDNA dynamics are predictive of long-term ICI response in the advanced, pan-cancer ECT setting. Even in this refractory advanced cancer cohort, an ultra-sensitive assay was required for accurate MRD status determination, with low ctDNA detections down to 4.2 PPM that might otherwise have been missed. Taken together, these findings suggest a high sensitivity ctDNA assay is crucial for accurate monitoring of ICI response, providing information for more accurate patient management.

Alisertib in patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer: The phase 2 ALISCA-Lung1 study.

TPS8128 Background: Treatment options are limited for patients (pts) with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) whose disease has progressed on or after platinum-based chemotherapy. Therefore, there is an urgent need for evaluation of novel agents in this setting. Aurora kinase A (AURKA) is a key regulator of mitosis and AURKA expression is associated with worse prognosis in multiple solid tumor types. Alisertib is a highly selective, reversible, ATP-competitive, orally administered, small-molecule AURKA inhibitor under investigation for treating SCLC. Phase 1/2 clinical trials of alisertib as either monotherapy or in combination with paclitaxel for relapsed/refractory solid tumors (including SCLC) reported response rates of 21–22%. The most common treatment-related grade ≥3 AEs were neutropenia, febrile neutropenia, and leukopenia. Preclinically, greater alisertib sensitivity has been reported in models with high c-Myc expression and/or loss of RB1 function. In a clinical study of alisertib + paclitaxel vs placebo + paclitaxel in SCLC, either c-Myc expression or mutation in RB1, RBL1, RBL2, or CDK6 showed strong correlation with an improvement in both PFS and OS in the alisertib arm. Methods: ALISCA-Lung1(NCT06095505) is a phase 2 study to determine whether there is a biomarker-defined population of pts with extensive-stage SCLC that derives increased benefit from alisertib monotherapy. Key inclusion criteria: ≥18 years of age; progression on or after first-line treatment with platinum-based chemotherapy + anti-PD-L1 immunotherapy; ≥1 measurable lesion per RECIST v1.1; availability of tissue sample for retrospective biomarker evaluation. Key exclusion criteria: prior treatment with AURKA-specific or pan-Aurora-targeted agents; active infection; immunocompromise; unstable brain metastases; inability/unwillingness to swallow tablets. Primary objective: to determine whether any biomarker(s) correlate with increased benefit to alisertib monotherapy. Biomarkers will be assessed by next-generation sequencing, mRNA expression analysis, and immunohistochemistry. Candidate biomarkers include, but are not limited to, RB1 loss of function, c-Myc expression, TP53mutation, AURKA expression, and SCLC molecular subtype. Secondary objectives: to determine investigator-assessed efficacy, survival, safety, and population pharmacokinetics. Eligible pts will receive alisertib 50 mg orally BID d1−7 q21d (including primary prophylaxis with G-CSF) until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent. All pts will undergo sparse pharmacokinetic sampling. Recruitment is underway and up to 60 pts will be enrolled at ~20 centers in the USA. Findings are anticipated to identify a biomarker-defined pt population that derives the greatest clinical benefit from alisertib. Future development of alisertib in SCLC is anticipated to focus on this biomarker-defined population. Clinical trial information: NCT06095505 .

TRITON: Phase 3b study of tremelimumab (T) + durvalumab (D) vs pembrolizumab (P), in combination with chemotherapy (CT), in non-squamous (NSQ) metastatic NSCLC (mNSCLC) with STK11and/or KEAP1 and/or KRAS mutations.

TPS8655 Background: Mutations in STK11 and KEAP1, present in approximately 20% and 15% of patients (pts) respectively with NSQ mNSCLC, lead to an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment and are associated with inferior clinical outcomes with anti-PD-(L)1 based chemo-immunotherapy, especially when co-mutated with KRAS. Pts with tumors bearing STK11, KEAP1and/or KRAS mutations may benefit from combinations with CTLA-4 inhibitors, aimed at increasing immune responses. In the phase 3 POSEIDON trial (NCT03164616), first-line (1L) T+D+CT significantly improved overall survival (OS; HR 0.77 [95% CI 0.65–0.92]; P=0.0030) vs CT. These results were maintained after a median follow-up of &gt;5 years. Subgroup analyses showed sustained OS improvement with T+D+CT vs CT in pts with mNSCLC with STK11 (NSQ), KEAP1(all histologies, due to small sample size), and KRAS (NSQ) mutations (HR [95% CI] 0.57 [0.32–1.04), 0.43 [0.16–1.25], and 0.55 [0.36–0.83], respectively). The TRITON study will further investigate the signal of efficacy observed in the POSEIDON subgroup analysis. The study will compare T+D+CT vs P+CT (a standard treatment for NSQ mNSCLC) in pts with STK11 and/or KEAP1 and/or KRASmutations. The results will help to inform clinical practice and to establish a biomarker-driven treatment strategy for these difficult-to-treat pts. Methods: TRITON (NCT06008093) is a phase 3b, multicenter, open-label, 2-arm parallel randomized study. Eligible pts, aged ≥18 years, must have NSQ mNSCLC (no EGFR or ALK alterations), with STK11, KEAP1, or KRAS mutations/co-mutations, no prior systemic therapy for mNSCLC, and ECOG performance status of 0/1. Approximately 280 pts will be randomized 1:1 to receive either T+D+CT or P+CT. In the T+D+CT arm, pts will receive T (75 mg) + D (1500 mg) + carboplatin (AUC 5 or 6)/cisplatin (75 mg/m2) + pemetrexed (500 mg/m2) every 3 weeks (Q3W) for 4 cycles (a fifth dose of T [75 mg] will be given in combination with D, post-platinum at week 16), followed by maintenance D (1500 mg) + pemetrexed (500 mg/m2) Q4W until disease progression (PD). In the P+CT arm, pts will receive P (200 mg) + carboplatin (AUC 5 or 6)/cisplatin (75 mg/m2) + pemetrexed (500 mg/m2) Q3W for 4 cycles, followed by maintenance P (200 mg) + pemetrexed (500 mg/m2) Q3W until PD, for up to 24 months. Randomization is stratified by mutation type ( KRAS [without STK11 or KEAP1] mutations are capped at 33% of the total sample) and tumor PD-L1 expression (≥1% vs &lt;1%). Primary endpoints are OS in all pts and in the subset with STK11 or KEAP1 mutations/co-mutations. Key secondary endpoints include OS rates at 12 and 24 months, progression-free survival, objective response rate, duration of response (all RECIST v1.1; investigator-assessed) and safety/tolerability (CTCAE v5.0). Enrollment is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT06008093 .