Improvement In Hamilton Rating Scale For Depression Scores Research Articles

Efficacy and safety of sulforaphane for treatment of mild to moderate depression in patients with history of cardiac interventions: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial.

Depression has been recognized as one of the disorders associated with cardiac interventions such as percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG). In the present study, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of sulforaphane in treatment of depression induced by cardiac interventions. After initial screening, 66 patients with previous history of at least one cardiac intervention and current mild to moderate depression were randomly assigned to two parallel groups receiving either sulforaphane (n= 33) or placebo (n= 33) for six successive weeks. Efficacy was assessed using the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) at baseline and week 2, 4, and 6. Safety of the treatments was checked during the trial period. Sixty participants completed the clinical trial (n= 30 in each group). Baseline demographic and clinical parameters were all similar among groups. Repeated measures analysis indicated that the sulforaphane group exhibited greater improvement in HAM-D scores throughout the trial (P< 0.001). Response to treatment (≥50% reduction in the HAM-D score) rate was higher in the sulforaphane group at trial endpoint (30% vs 6.67%, P= 0.042). Remission (HAM-D score ≤ 7) rate was also higher in the sulforaphane group; however, the difference was not significant (23.33% vs 3.33%, P=0.052). Finally, no significant difference was observed between the two groups in terms of frequency of side effects. Sulforaphane could safely improve depressive symptoms induced by cardiac interventions. Further clinical trials with larger sample sizes and longer follow-up periods are warranted to confirm our results.

Efficacy and safety of pentoxifylline combination therapy in major depressive disorder: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial.

In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial, we assessed the efficacy and safety of pentoxifylline combination therapy with sertraline in treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD). A total of 56 patients with MDD were assigned into two parallel groups to receive sertraline (100 mg/day) plus placebo or sertraline (100 mg/day) plus pentoxifylline (400 mg three times daily) for six weeks. Patients were evaluated with the Hamilton rating scale for depression (HAM-D) at baseline and weeks 2, 4 and 6. The sertraline plus pentoxifylline group demonstrated greater improvement in HAM-D scores from baseline to all three study time points (P = 0.013, 0.007 and 0.016 for week 2, 4 and 6, respectively). Response to treatment rate was also significantly higher in the sertraline plus pentoxifylline group compared to the sertraline plus placebo group at week 4 [57.1 vs. 21.4%, P = 0.013] and the study endpoint [96.4 vs. 57.1%, P = 0.001]. However, the remission rate, time to remission and time to treatment response did not show any significant difference between trial groups. Our findings support the efficacy and safety of pentoxifylline combination therapy in patients with MDD.

Efficacy and safety of tipepidine as adjunctive therapy in major depressive disorder: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial.

Tipepidine, a synthetic, non-opioid expectorant, has been shown to improve depressive-like behavior in animal models of depression. In this study, we assessed the efficacy and tolerability of tipepidine combination therapy with citalopram in treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD). In a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled clinical trial, 62 patients with MDD were assigned into two parallel groups to receive citalopram (up to 40 mg/day) plus placebo or citalopram plus tipepidine (30 mg twice daily) for 6 weeks. Participants were assessed with the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) at baseline and Weeks 2, 4, and 6. Fifty-six patients completed the trial. The tipepidine group showed greater improvement in HAM-D scores from baseline to all three study time points (P = 0.048 for all). The remission and response-to-treatment rates were significantly higher in the tipepidine group (53.6% and 100%) compared to the placebo group (25.0% and 75%) at the study end-point (P = 0.029 and 0.005, respectively). The remission and response times in patients in the tipepidine group were also shorter compared with the placebo group (log-rank P = 0.020 and 0.004). There was no significant difference between the two groups in baseline parameters or frequency of side-effects. Tipepidine combination therapy with citalopram can effectively improve symptoms of patients with MDD in a shorter period of treatment. However, further studies with larger sample sizes and longer follow-up treatment are needed to confirm our findings.

Connectome-based models can predict early symptom improvement in major depressive disorder

BackgroundMajor depressive disorder (MDD) is a debilitating mental illness with more than 50% of patients not achieving an adequate response using first-line treatments. Reliable models that predict antidepressant treatment outcome are needed to guide clinical decision making. We aimed to build predictive models of treatment improvement for MDD patients using machine learning approaches based on fMRI resting-state functional connectivity patterns. MethodsResting-state fMRI data were acquired from 192 untreated MDD patients at recruitment, and their severity of depression was assessed by Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAMD) at baseline. Patients were given medication after the initial MR scan and their symptoms were monitored through HAMD for a period of six months. Connectome-based predictive modeling (CPM) algorithms were implemented to predict the improvement in HAMD score at one month from resting-state connectivity at baseline. Additionally, by selectively combining the features from all leave-one-out iterations in the model building stage, we created a consensus model that could be generalized to predict improvement in HAMD score in samples of non-overlapping subjects at different time points. ResultsUsing baseline functional connectivity, CPM successfully predicted symptom improvement of depression at one month. In addition, a consensus ‘MDD improvement model’ could predict symptom improvement for novel individuals at the two-week, one-month, two-month and three-month time points after antidepressant treatment. ConclusionsIndividual pre-treatment functional brain networks contain meaningful information that can be gleaned to build predictors of treatment outcome. The identified MDD improvement networks could be an appropriate biomarker for predicting individual therapeutic response of antidepressant treatment. Replication and validation using other large datasets will be a key next step before these models can be used in clinical practice.

Brexanolone for postpartum depression.

Postpartum depression (PPD) is defined as a major depressive episode occurring during pregnancy or within 4 weeks of delivery that may have significant consequences for mother and infant. Antidepressants are used to treat PPD, but their effectiveness may be limited by a slow time to peak effect. Brexanolone is Food and Drug Administration-approved for the management of PPD; its use requires patient participation in a risk evaluation and mitigation strategies (REMS) program. This review evaluates the efficacy and safety of brexanolone in PPD. Four completed studies, 1 quasi-experimental study and 3 randomized controlled trials (RCTs), were reviewed. Females who had moderate or severe PPD during the third trimester or within 4 weeks of delivery and were less than 6 months postpartum at initiation of therapy were included. Improvement in Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) scores was assessed in addition to safety outcomes and scores on other depression rating scales. All studies demonstrated statistical improvement in HAM-D scores from baseline with brexanolone vs placebo use at the end of infusions (ie, hour 60). Results with regard to sustained HAM-D score improvements were mixed in the RCTs at 30-day follow-up. The most frequent adverse events in brexanolone-treated patients were sedation, dizziness, somnolence, and headache. The severe or serious adverse effect of presyncope, syncope, or loss of consciousness was reported by 4% of participants. With a rapid onset of action, brexanolone could be considered advantageous over traditional therapies for PPD in patients for whom a rapid response is required due to severity of disease. Significant concerns remain regarding sustained effect and use in patients outside of the clinical trial setting.

The Phosphodiesterase Inhibitor Pentoxifylline as a Novel Adjunct to Antidepressants in Major Depressive Disorder Patients: A Proof-of-Concept, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial

Background: There is evidence for an association between major depressive disorder (MDD) and both inflammatory and phosphodiesterase (PDE) pathways. This study aimed to evaluate the adjunct role of the PDE inhibitor pentoxifylline (PTX), a compound with anti-inflammatory properties, in the treatment of adult patients with MDD. Methods: This was a prospective, 12-week, double-blind study of parallel groups. Eighty adult outpatients who met the DSM-IV criteria for MDD participated in the trial. Patients were required to have a baseline Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) score of at least 18. Patients were allocated randomly: 40 received escitalopram 20 mg/day plus placebo while the other 40 received escitalopram 20 mg/day plus PTX (400 mg b.i.d.). Patients were assessed by a psychiatrist at baseline, and 4, 8, and 12 weeks after the medication had been started. The serum levels of TNF-α, IL-6, IL-10, BDNF, 8-OHdG, and serotonin were measured at baseline and after therapy. Results: After 8 and 12 weeks, the PTX group showed a statistically significantly greater improvement in HAM-D score compared to the control group (least squares mean difference [LSMD] –3.29, p = 0.000 and LSMD –3.49, p = 0.000, respectively). Moreover, the PTX group showed a statistically significantly greater reduction in the serum levels of TNF-α, IL-6, IL-10, and 8-OHdG along with a statistically significant increase in the levels of BDNF and serotonin in comparison with the control group after the treatment. Conclusion: The findings of this study suggest that PTX could be a promising adjunct to antidepressants in the treatment of MDD patients.

The superiority of antidepressant medication to cognitive behavior therapy in melancholic depressed patients: a 12-week single-blind randomized study

To pursue the previously long-standing but formally untested clinical view that melancholia is preferentially responsive to antidepressant medication in comparison with psychotherapy [specifically Cognitive Behavior Therapy (CBT)]. Second, to determine whether a broader action antidepressant medication sequencing regimen is superior to a Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor (SSRI) alone. We sought to recruit a large sample of participants with melancholic depression for a 12-week trial but inclusion criteria compromised recruitment and testing the second hypothesis. The first hypothesis was evaluated by comparing 18 participants receiving antidepressant medication to 11 receiving CBT. Primary study measures were the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) and the Hamilton Endogenous Subscale (HES), rated blindly, while several secondary measures also evaluated outcome. Participants receiving medication had a superior 12-week outcome to those receiving CBT, with significant differences present on primary measures as early as 4 weeks. At trial conclusion, the percentage improvement in HAM-D scores was 61.1% vs. 34.4%, respectively [Number Needed to Treat (NNT) = 3.7] and with those in receipt of medication returning non-significantly higher HAM-D responder (66.6% vs. 36.4%, NNT = 2.8) and remission (66.7% vs. 45.4%, NNT = 4.7) rates. As the sample size was small and participants evidenced only moderate levels of depression severity, the study risked being underpowered and idiosyncratic. Despite the small sample, the superiority of antidepressant medication to CBT in those with a melancholic depression was distinctive in this pilot study.

Cognitive Predictors of Response to Treatment for Depression in Multiple Sclerosis

Cognitive Predictors of Response to Treatment for Depression in Multiple Sclerosis

Coadministration of a beta-adrenergic antagonist and a tricyclic antidepressant: A pilot study

After a 7-day washout period, 16 subjects suffering from unipolar depression were randomly assigned to either desipramine (DMI) or DMI plus propranolol treatment for 21 days. Both groups showed a significant improvement in their scores on the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD) after 21 days of drug treatment. However, there was no significant difference in the improvement in HRSD scores between the two groups. The results of this pilot study support the need to reevaluate the popular belief that propranolol induces or worsens depression.

Antidepressant or antianxiety? A study of the efficacy of antidepressant medication

The authors analyzed the relative contributions of improvement in depressive and anxiety symptoms, as measured by the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD) and the Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety (HRSA), respectively, after 1 week of treatment to the prediction of improvement in HRSD score after 6 weeks of antidepressant pharmacotherapy. Fifty-six subjects completed 6 weeks of treatment with either desipramine ( n = 20), alprazolam ( n = 18), or a desipramine-alprazolam combination ( n = 18). The results showed that early improvement in the HRSD was a moderately strong predictor of the total 6-week improvement in HRSD score, and a better predictor than early improvement in the HRSA. Partial correlations showed that early HRSD improvement was significantly related to total HRSD improvement within the alprazolam group. This pattern of response differed from those observed for the other treatment groups. Desipramine-treated subjects showed gradual improvement over the course of the study, and the improvement in week 1 was not so strongly predictive of overall improvement. The relationship between early and total HRSD improvement for the combination treatment group was intermediate to the other two groups. These findings are discussed in the context of the relationship between depression and anxiety, and potential implications for the treatment of these overlapping and often mixed syndromes.