Improve Arm Function Research Articles

Bimanual Arm Trainer Versus Traditional Occupational Therapy Services in Upper Extremity Function.

Upper extremity (UE) dysfunction resulting from stroke significantly affects a person's ability to complete self-care activities, consequently diminishing functional independence. Effective interventions that improve UE function in persons with stroke are needed. To explore the effectiveness of the Bimanual Arm Trainer (BAT) compared with traditional occupational therapy treatment sessions (i.e., a control group) on improving UE function after acute ischemic stroke. Clinical trial, two-group, nonrandomized repeated-measures design. Inpatient rehabilitation facility. Twenty-seven persons with ischemic stroke and an Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) score ≤17. Minimum of three 10-min sessions on the BAT. ARAT, Upper Extremity Fugl-Meyer Assessment of Motor Recovery after Stroke (FMA-UE). Both the intervention and control groups showed significant improvement on the ARAT from evaluation to discharge (main effect of time: p = .02). There was no statistically significant main effect of group and no significant Time × Group interaction (p = .63). FMA-UE scores also improved significantly in the intervention group from evaluation to discharge (p < .001). FMA-UE scores were not available for the control group. Both the intervention and control groups demonstrated significant improvements in UE function from evaluation to discharge. There were no statistically significant differences between groups, indicating that the BAT results in similar improvements in UE function, as would be expected in traditional occupational therapy. Further research is warranted to examine additional BAT programs, use different outcome measures, and assess participants over a longer time span. Plain-Language Summary: The Bimanual Arm Trainer (BAT) is a novel device that can be used in occupational therapy to improve arm function among stroke patients. There is limited research on BAT's effectiveness in improving arm function among stroke patients. In an acute inpatient rehabilitation setting, we compared outcome scores of patients who received traditional occupational therapy services with those who also used the BAT. Both groups achieved significant improvements in arm function from evaluation to discharge. We found that the addition of the BAT interventions did not significantly affect the outcome measure scores for either group. We conclude that more research is needed to examine additional BAT programs, use different outcome measures, and assess participants over a longer period of time.

A Sensor-Based Upper Limb Treatment in Hemiplegic Patients: Results from a Randomized Pilot Study.

In post-stroke patients, the disabling motor deficit mainly affects the upper limb. The focus of rehabilitation is improving upper limb function and reducing long-term disability. This study aims to evaluate the feasibility of using the Gloreha Aria (R-Lead), a sensor-based upper limb in-hospital rehabilitation, compared with conventional physiotherapist-led training in subacute hemiplegic patients. Twenty-one patients were recruited and randomised 1:1 to a sensor-based group (treatment group TG) or a conventional group (control group, CG). All patients performed 30 sessions of 30 min each of dedicated upper limb rehabilitation. The Fugl-Meyer Assessment for Upper Extremity (FMA-UE) was the primary evaluation., both as a motor score and as individual items. Secondary evaluations were Functional Independence Measure; global disability assessed with the Modified Barthel Index; Motor Evaluation Scale for UE in stroke; power grip; and arm, shoulder, and hand disability. All the enrolled patients, 10 in the TG and 11 in the CG, completed all hand rehabilitation sessions during their hospital stay without experiencing any adverse events. FMA-UE scores in upper limb motor function improved in both groups [delta change CG (11.8 ± 9.2) vs. TG (12.7 ± 8.6)]. The score at T1 for FMA joint pain (21.8 vs. 24 best score) suggests the use of the Gloreha Aria (R-Lead) as feasible in improving arm function abilities in post-stroke patients.

Therapists and patients perceptions of a mixed reality system designed to improve trunk control and upper extremity function

A prototype system aimed at improving arm function and trunk control after stroke has been developed that combines mixed-reality (MR) feedback with a mobile seat system (Holoreach). The purpose of this study was to assess the usability of Holoreach in a rehabilitation setting from both the patient and therapist perspective. Ten therapists (eight physiotherapists and two occupational therapists) used the device in their regular therapy programs for fifteen stroke patients with trunk control issues. Each patient received four individual therapy sessions with the device performed under the supervision of the therapist. Therapists and patients kept therapy diaries and used customized questionnaires. At the end of the study two focus groups were conducted to further assess usability. Generally, the prototype system is suitable for training trunk and arm control. The therapists expressed overall positive views on the impact of Holoreach. They characterized it as new, motivating, fresh, joyful, interesting, and exciting. All therapists and 80% of the patients agreed with the statement that training with Holoreach is beneficial for rehabilitation. Nonetheless, improvements are required in the hardware and software, and design. The prototype system contributes at various levels to the rapidly evolving advances in neurorehabilitation, particularly regarding the practical aspect of exercise delivery.

Usage Frequency, Barriers, And Effectiveness of Functional Electrical Stimulation as An Intervention for Stroke Patients

Objective: To determine the frequency of Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES) use in stroke rehabilitation and to identify the barriers and effectiveness of its usage as an intervention for stroke patients. Materials &amp; Methods: This prospective observational study was performed in different clinics and hospitals in Hyderabad. Physical therapists actively practicing in healthcare facilities within Hyderabad, with a minimum of one year of clinical experience in stroke rehabilitation of either gender were included. A questionnaire was structured to collect data on the usage frequency, perceived barriers, and effectiveness related to the utilization of FES in stroke rehabilitation. Results: Most of the participants were using FES frequently and sometimes for shoulder subluxation, improving arm function, enhancing walking function, improving muscle strength and endurance, addressing hypertonia and spasticity, and improving sensation. Respondents when asked about having sufficient time to apply FES, lack of evidence justifying FES use, and regards to workplace support most of the cases &gt;50% agreed strongly agreed, while &lt;50% of study subjects’ believed that does not provide advantages for individuals having a chronic stroke. FES utilization among healthcare professionals in stroke patient rehabilitation, highlighting its potential benefits in improving arm function, shoulder subluxation, walking performance, and hemiplegic shoulder pain. However, there were no significant barriers identified. Conclusion: There was a significant use of FES by physical therapists in Hyderabad to address various aspects of stroke rehabilitation. The study overall highlights its potential for improving arm function, preventing shoulder subluxation, enhancing walking, and reducing hemiplegic shoulder pain, without significant identified barriers.

Measuring Upper Extremity Activity of Children With Unilateral Cerebral Palsy Using Wrist-Worn Accelerometers: A Pilot Study.

Children with unilateral cerebral palsy (UCP) have poor strength and movement control on one side of their body, leading to impaired bimanual coordination skills. To compare duration and intensity of all-day habitual movement of the dominant and nondominant upper extremities (UEs) in typically developing (TD) children and children with UCP. Two-group observational study. Children's naturalistic settings. Convenience sample of 9 TD children and 9 children with UCP. Children wore accelerometers on both wrists all day and night for 1 wk. We compared the extent of asymmetry in bilateral arm use (intensity and duration) between the 2 groups. Compared with TD children who use both UEs equally, children with UCP were more likely to use their dominant or unaffected UE than their nondominant or affected UE during daily activities. There were no differences between groups in dominant UE activity. However, children with UCP engaged in lower levels of moderate to vigorous activity and greater levels of light activity with their nondominant or affected UE than their TD peers. Wrist-worn accelerometry can provide objective information on real-world habitual activity with both arms in children. Accelerometers are nonintrusive, easy to use, and well tolerated by children, and they allow prolonged monitoring of UE activity outside therapeutic contexts. Occupational therapists can use wrist-worn accelerometers as sensitive tools to assess asymmetries in UE use at baseline and as an outcome measure to assess the efficacy of behavioral interventions and carryover into real-world settings among children with UCP. Plain-Language Summary: This pilot study provides promising evidence that supports the use of wrist-worn accelerometry as an accurate, easy-to-use, and objective assessment tool for children with unilateral cerebral palsy (UCP) to detect asymmetries in bilateral real-world arm activity at baseline and after intensive occupational therapy interventions to improve arm function. The authors used wrist-worn accelerometry for one week with 9 typically developing (TD) children and 9 children with UCP to compare dominant or unaffected versus nondominant or affected upper extremity (UE) use for intensity and duration of activity. Compared with TD children, children with UCP had lower relative intensity of activity in the nondominant UE than the dominant UE. Wrist-worn accelerometers seem to be a sensitive measure to detect asymmetries in bilateral all-day UE use in children with UCP. The findings have implications for the use of wrist-worn accelerometers as an outcome measure to assess the efficacy of intensive therapies to improve real-world affected UE activity and bimanual function among children with UCP.

Increasing the delivery of upper limb constraint-induced movement therapy programs for stroke and brain injury survivors: evaluation of the ACTIveARM project

Purpose To increase the number of constraint-induced movement therapy (CIMT) programs provided by rehabilitation services. Methods A before-and-after implementation study involving nine rehabilitation services. The implementation package to help change practice included file audit–feedback cycles, 2-day workshops, poster reminders, a community-of-practice and drop-in support. File audits were conducted at baseline, every three months for 1.5 years, and once after support ceased to evaluate maintenance of change. CIMT participant outcomes were collected to evaluate CIMT effectiveness and maintenance (Action Research Arm Test and Motor Activity Log). Staff focus groups explored factors influencing CIMT delivery. Results CIMT adoption improved from baseline where only 2% of eligible people were offered and/or received CIMT (n = 408 files) to more than 50% over 1.5 years post-implementation (n = 792 files, 52% to 73% offered CIMT, 27%–46% received CIMT). Changes were maintained at 6-month follow-up (n = 172 files, 56% offered CIMT, 40% received CIMT). CIMT participants (n = 74) demonstrated clinically significant improvements in arm function and occupational performance. Factors influencing adoption included interdisciplinary collaboration, patient support needs, intervention adaptations, a need for continued training, and clinician support. Conclusions The implementation package helped therapists overcome an evidence-practice gap and deliver CIMT more routinely.

Task-specific training versus usual care to improve upper limb function after stroke: the "Task-AT Home" randomised controlled trial protocol.

Sixty percent of people have non-functional arms 6 months after stroke. More effective treatments are needed. Cochrane Reviews show low-quality evidence that task-specific training improves upper limb function. Our feasibility trial showed 56 h of task-specific training over 6 weeks resulted in an increase of a median 6 points on the Action Research Arm test (ARAT), demonstrating the need for more definitive evidence from a larger randomised controlled trial. Task-AT Home is a two-arm, assessor-blinded, multicentre randomised, controlled study, conducted in the home setting. The objective is to determine whether task-specific training is a more effective treatment than usual care, for improving upper limb function, amount of upper limb use, and health related quality of life at 6 weeks and 6 months after intervention commencement. Our primary hypothesis is that upper limb function will achieve a ≥ 5 point improvement on the ARAT in the task-specific training group compared to the usual care group, after 6 weeks of intervention. Participants living at home, with remaining upper limb deficit, are recruited at 3 months after stroke from sites in NSW and Victoria, Australia. Following baseline assessment, participants are randomised to 6 weeks of either task-specific or usual care intervention, stratified for upper limb function based on the ARAT score. The task-specific group receive 14 h of therapist-led task-specific training plus 42 h of guided self-practice. The primary outcome measure is the ARAT at 6 weeks. Secondary measures include the Motor Activity Log (MAL) at 6 weeks and the ARAT, MAL and EQ5D-5 L at 6 months. Assessments occur at baseline, after 6 weeks of intervention, and at 6 months after intervention commencement. Analysis will be intention to treat using a generalised linear mixed model to report estimated mean differences in scores between the two groups at each timepoint with 95% confidence interval and value of p. If the task-specific home-based training programme is more effective than usual care in improving arm function, implementation of the programme into clinical practice would potentially lead to improvements in upper limb function and quality of life for people with stroke. ANZCTR.org.au/ACTRN12617001631392p.aspx.

Effects of a lymphedema prevention program based on the theory of knowledge-attitude-practice on postoperative breast cancer patients: A randomized clinical trial.

Breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) is one of the common postoperative complications that severely affects the functions of the arm and quality of life. Since lymphedema is difficult to treat and prone to recurrence, early prevention of lymphedema is crucial. Patient diagnosed with breast cancer (N = 108) were randomized to the intervention (n = 52) or control group (n = 56). In the intervention group, patients were provided the lymphedema prevention program based on the theory of knowledge-attitude-practice during the perioperative period and the first three chemotherapy sessions (mainly includes health education, seminars, knowledge manuals, sports guidance, peer education, and WeChat group).The limb volume, handgrip strength, arm function, and quality of life were measured in all patients at the baseline, 9 weeks (T1), and 18 weeks (T2) after surgery. The incidence of lymphedema in the Intervention group was numerically lower than in the control group after implementing the lymphedema prevention program, but the difference was not statistically significant (T1: 1.9% vs. 3.8%, p = 1.000; T2: 3.6% vs. 7.1%, p = 0.744). However, compared with the control group, the intervention group showed there was less deterioration in handgrip strength (T1 [t = -2.512, p < 0.05] and T2 [t = -2.538, p < 0.05]), improved postoperative upper limb dysfunction (T1 [t = 3.087, p < 0.05] and T2 [t = 5.399, p < 0.05]) and less deterioration in quality of life (T1 [p < 0.05] and T2 [p < 0.05]). Although the investigated lymphedema prevention program improved arm function and quality of life, it did not reduce the incidence of lymphedema in postoperative breast cancer patients.

Three Ways to Improve Arm Function in the Chronic Phase After Stroke by Robotic Priming Combined With Mirror Therapy, Arm Training, and Movement-Oriented Therapy

ObjectiveTo examine the effects of bilateral robotic priming combined with mirror therapy (R-mirr) vs bilateral robotic priming combined with bilateral arm training (R-bilat), relative to the control approach of bilateral robotic priming combined with movement-oriented training (R-mov) in patients with stroke. DesignA single-blind, preliminary, randomized controlled trial. SettingFour outpatient rehabilitation settings. ParticipantsOutpatients with stroke and mild to moderate motor impairment (N=63). InterventionsPatients received 6 weeks of clinic-based R-mirr, R-bilat, or R-mov for 90 min/d, 3 d/wk, plus a transfer package at home for 5 d/wk. Main Outcome MeasuresFugl-Meyer Assessment Upper Extremity subscale (FMA-UE), ABILHAND, and Stroke Impact Scale v3.0 scores before, immediately after, and 3 months after treatment as well as lateral pinch strength and accelerometry before and immediately after treatment. ResultsThe posttest results favored R-mirr over R-bilat and R-mov on the FMA-UE score (P<.05). Follow-up analysis revealed that significant improvement in FMA-UE score was retained at the 3-month follow-up in the R-mirr over R-bilat or R-mov (P<.05). Significant improvements were not observed in the R-mirr over R-bilat and R-mov on other outcomes. ConclusionsBetween-group differences were only detected for the primary outcome, FMA-UE. R-mirr was more effective at enhancing upper limb motor improvement, and the effect has the potential to be maintained at 3 months of follow-up.

The Effect of Robot-Assisted Training on Arm Function, Walking, Balance, and Activities of Daily Living After Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

This meta-analysis aimed to compare the effects of robot-assisted training (RAT) with those of conventional therapy (CT), considering the potential sources of heterogeneity in the previous studies. We searched three international electronic databases (MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library) to identify relevant studies. Risk of bias assessment was performed using the Cochrane's Risk of Bias 1.0 tool. The certainty of the evidence was evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations method. The meta-analyses for each outcome of the respective domains were performed using 24 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on robot-assisted arm training (RAAT) for arm function, 7 RCTs on RAAT for activities of daily living (ADL), 12 RCTs on robot-assisted gait training (RAGT) for balance, 6 RCTs on RAGT for walking, and 7 RCTs on RAGT for ADL. The random-effects model for the meta-analysis revealed that RAAT has significant superiority over CT in improving arm function, and ADL. We also showed that RAGT has significant superiority over CT in improving balance. Our study provides high-level evidence for the superiority of RAT over CT in terms of functional recovery after stroke. Therefore, physicians should consider RAT as a therapeutic option for facilitating functional recovery after stroke.

Seventh Cervical Nerve (C7) Transection for Spastic Arm Paralysis After Cerebral Injury.

Spastic limb paralysis because of cerebral injury can cause long-term disability. Its treatment varies from conservative to operative; however, the optimum treatment is yet to be found. To test the hypothesis that patients with spastic arm paralysis who receive C7 nerve transection to their paralyzed side might have reduction in spasticity, pain, and improvement in arm function. Four patients with spastic hemiparesis that had ceased to improve after 1 year of rehabilitation, having pain and poor function, were included. All 4 patients underwent C7 nerve transection plus rehabilitation. The outcome was assessed at 1, 3, and 6 months by the Fugl-Meyer upper extremity scale for motor recovery, by the Modified Ashworth Scale score for spasticity, and by the visual analogue score for pain. Functional use of the limb was also assessed by performance of activities such as dressing, tying shoe laces, wringing a towel, and operating a mobile phone. At the end of 6 months, there was a significant improvement in mean Fugl Meyer score, reduction in Modified Ashworth score, and Visual Analogue scale for pain. At the beginning of the study, none of the patients could perform any day-to-day activities; however, at the end of 6 months, 3/4 of the patients could perform at least 1 activity. C7 neurectomy leads to improved motor function, reduction of spasticity and pain, and improvement in function in patients with spastic arm paralysis because of cerebral injury.

Evaluation of Three Bridging Tricorticocancellous Bone Grafts in the Treatment of Old Non-uniting Fractured Humerus

Background: Nonunion of humeral shaft fracture after conservative treatments or frequent failed surgical treatment of bone healing exemplify the difficulties in managing a bone defect or severely damaged individuals. Aim of the study: The present study was undertaken to evaluate three bridging tricoticocancellous bone grafts in the treatment of old non-uniting fractured humerus. Materials and Methods: From June 2014 to December 2019, three bridging tricoticocancellous bone grafts were used to treat non-union humeral shaft fractures using dynamic compression plates at Sulaimani Teaching Hospital in Iraq. Results: Sixteen patients, 11 males, and 5 females, varying in age from 28 to 64 years old (mean age 41) were recruited for the study. Six patients had previously undergone conservative treatment, and ten patients had previously undergone surgical treatment, such as open reduction and internal fixation with plates and screws or various intramedullary nails. Four out of ten patients had previously received bone transplants in conjunction with internal fixation. The nonunion lasted between 2 and 4 years (a mean of 3 years). In patients who were treated by recanalization of the medullary canal healing rate of a non-uniting fractured shaft, humerus reached 100% in all 16 patients, indicating improvements in both bone healing and functional index outcomes. The satisfaction rate score was in 15 patients (93.75%). Also, the function score was excellent in 15 patients (93.75%), while the movement score was in 14 patients (87.5%). The union rate, angular deformity, and limb shortening were used to evaluate bone results. Conclusion: When using the technique of medullary recanalization opening the bone canal, and fixation by dynamic compression plate for old non-uniting fractured shaft humerus patients, the findings confirm that three bridging tricoticocancellous bone grafts are superior in healing and union, improved arm function, and a high satisfaction rate as achieved.&#x0D;

Adult experiences of constraint-induced movement therapy programmes: a qualitative study using the Theoretical Domains Framework and Capability, Opportunity, Motivation - Behaviour system.

To explore the experiences of adults who completed a constraint-induced movement therapy (CIMT) programme, and the barriers and enablers to their participation. Qualitative design using semi-structured interviews. Stroke and brain injury survivors (n = 45) who had completed CIMT as part of their usual rehabilitation were interviewed 1 month post-CIMT. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed and imported into Nvivo for analysis. Inductive coding was used to identify initial themes. Themes were then deductively mapped to the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation - Behaviour system, a behaviour change model, to identify barriers and enablers to CIMT programme adherence and engagement. Enablers influencing participation included being provided with education about the programme (Capability - psychological), seeing improvements in arm function (Motivation - reflective), being committed to the programme (Motivation - reflective) and having strong social support from staff, family and allied health students (Opportunity - social). The structured programme was a motivator and offered a way to fill the time, particularly during inpatient rehabilitation (Opportunity - physical). Barriers to participation included experiencing physical and mental fatigue (Capability - physical) and frustration early in the CIMT programme (Motivation - automatic), and finding exercises boring and repetitive (Motivation - automatic). Therapist provision of educational supports for CIMT participants and their families is important to maximise CIMT programme uptake. During CIMT delivery, we recommend the provision of positive feedback and coaching in alignment with CIMT principles, and the inclusion of social supports such as group-based programmes to enhance participant adherence.

Action observation for upper limb rehabilitation after stroke.

Action observation (AO) is a physical rehabilitation approach that facilitates the occurrence of neural plasticity through the activation of the mirror-neural system, promoting motor recovery in people with stroke. To assess whether AO enhances upper limb motor function in people with stroke. We searched the Cochrane Stroke Group Trials Register (last searched 18 May 2021), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (18 May 2021), MEDLINE (1946 to 18 May 2021), Embase (1974 to 18 May 2021), and five additional databases. We also searched trial registries and reference lists. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of AO alone or associated with physical practice in adults after stroke. The primary outcome was upper limb (arm and hand) motor function. Secondary outcomes included dependence on activities of daily living (ADL), motor performance, cortical activation, quality of life, and adverse effects. Two review authors independently selected trials according to the predefined inclusion criteria, extracted data, assessed risk of bias using RoB 1, and applied the GRADE approach to assess the certainty of the evidence. The reviews authors contacted trial authors for clarification and missing information. We included 16 trials involving 574 individuals. Most trials provided AO followed by the practice of motor actions. Training varied between 1 day and 8 weeks of therapy, 10 to 90 minutes per session. The time of AO ranged from 1 minute to 10 minutes for each motor action, task or movement observed. The total number of motor actions ranged from 1 to 3. Control comparisons included sham observation, physical therapy, and functional activity practice. AO improved arm function (standardized mean difference (SMD) 0.39, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.17 to 0.61; 11 trials, 373 participants; low-certainty evidence); and improved hand function (mean difference (MD) 2.76, 95% CI 1.04 to 4.49; 5 trials, 178 participants; low-certainty evidence). AO did not improve ADL performance (SMD 0.37, 95% CI -0.34 to 1.08; 7 trials, 302 participants; very low-certainty evidence), or quality of life (MD 5.52, 95% CI -30.74 to 41.78; 2 trials, 30 participants; very low-certainty evidence). We were unable to pool the other secondary outcomes (motor performance and cortical activation). Only two trials reported adverse events without significant adverse effects. The effects of AO are small for arm function compared to any control group; for hand function the effects are large, but not clinically significant. For both, the certainty of evidence is low. There is no evidence of benefit or detriment from AO on ADL and quality of life of people with stroke; however, the certainty of evidence is very low. As such, our confidence in the effect estimate is limited because it will likely change with future research.

Effect of motor relearning program on the upper limb function in stroke survivors: A systematic review

Background&#x0D; Problems with upper limb impairments are very common after a stroke. Improving arm function is a core element of rehabilitation. Many physiotherapy interventions have been developed some of which has have found to be beneficial.&#x0D; &#x0D; Objective&#x0D; To analyze the effect of motor relearning program (MRP) on the upper limb function in stroke survivors.&#x0D; &#x0D; Data sources&#x0D; This systematic review included Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) and quasi-experimental studies for patients suffering from stroke. The articles were retrieved from&#x0D; Google Scholar, Cochrane and Pub Med. Articles were also accessed from Journals.&#x0D; &#x0D; Study selection&#x0D; Data belonging from 2012 to 2021 were included. RCTs and quasi experimental studies that focused on motor relearning program for upper limb/hand for stroke patients were included in this review.&#x0D; &#x0D; Results&#x0D; Total 10 studies were included in this review with 339 patients. Among them, 217 had received MRP whereas, 122 had received other physiotherapy treatment technique for stroke rehabilitation.&#x0D; &#x0D; Conclusion&#x0D; MRP given alone or in conjunction with other physiotherapeutic treatment is likely to yield beneficial results for improving the upper limb /hand function in stroke patients.&#x0D;

Upper Extremity Contralaterally Controlled Functional Electrical Stimulation Versus Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation in Post-Stroke Individuals: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Background Electrical stimulation has been employed as a safe and effective therapy for improving arm function after stroke. Contralaterally controlled functional electrical stimulation (CCFES) is a unique method that has progressed from application in small feasibility studies to implementation in several randomized controlled trials. However, no meta-analysis has been conducted to summarize its efficacy. Objective To summarize the effect size of CCFES through measures of upper extremity motor recovery compared with that of neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES). Methods The PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases were searched. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were selected and subjected to meta-analysis and risk of bias assessment. Results 6 RCTs were selected and 267 participants were included. The Upper Extremity Fugl-Meyer assessment (UEFMA) was included in all studies, the Box and Blocks test (BBT) and active range of motion (AROM) were included in 3 and 4 studies, respectively. The modified Barthel Index (mBI) and Arm Motor Abilities Test (AMAT) were included in 2 and 3 studies, respectively. The CCFES group demonstrated greater improvement than the NMES did in UEFMA (SMD = .42, 95% CI = .07–.76), BBT (SMD = .48, 95% CI = .10–.86), AROM (SMD = .54, 95% CI = .23–.86), and mBI (SMD = .54, 95% CI = .12–.97). However, the results for AMAT did not differ significantly (SMD = .34, 95% CI = −.03–.72). Conclusion Contralaterally controlled functional electrical stimulation produced greater improvements in upper extremity hemiplegia in people with stroke than NMES did. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42021245831

Huashan perioperative nursing program for stroke patients undergoing contralateral seventh cervical nerve transfer

BackgroundA previous investigation regarding contralateral seventh cervical nerve transfer (CC7) revealed a novel and effective approach to improve arm function in patients with chronic spastic paralysis. The patients who underwent both CC7 and standard rehabilitation showed greater functional improvements and spasticity reductions than patients in the control group, who underwent rehabilitation only. Additional efforts are needed to maximize the benefits in patients and establishing a supporting nursing program is a promising method for achieving this goal.MethodsThe present Huashan nursing program was established in consideration of the following elements: providing routine perioperative care, ensuring surgical safety, and improving patient cooperation. Before surgery, psychiatric nursing, health education, and risk control were emphasized. After surgery, in addition to routine nursing and positioning, special attention was needed for targeted nursing in cases of postoperative adverse events. In addition, we performed descriptive statistical analysis of the clinical data of patients participating in the Huashan nursing program, focusing on postoperative adverse events. In total, 85 patients were included in the study, 10 of whom experienced adverse events, including severe pain (5, 5.88%), neck hematoma (2, 2.35%), dyspnea (2, 2.35%), and hoarseness (1, 1.18%). The above adverse events were alleviated through the targeted nursing care guided by the Huashan program.DiscussionThis article introduces the Huashan nursing program, which is based on preoperative evaluations, educational sessions, postoperative monitoring, and targeted nursing, for patients undergoing CC7. This nursing program helped promote and provided the opportunity to maximize the benefits of CC7.

Cost-Effectiveness of Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy Implementation in Neurorehabilitation: The ACTIveARM Project.

BackgroundConstraint-induced movement therapy (CIMT) is a recommended intervention for improving arm recovery following stroke and traumatic brain injury; however, delivery in practice remains rare.PurposeThe aim of this study was to investigate the costs and cost effectiveness of CIMT delivery, and the use of a CIMT implementation package designed to improve CIMT uptake and delivery by therapists in Sydney, Australia.MethodsThis economic evaluation was conducted with a subset of CIMT programmes (n = 20) delivered by neurological rehabilitation teams at five varied hospitals within a mixed methods implementation study (ACTIveARM). The costs of delivering the CIMT implementation package and publicly funded CIMT were calculated using a bottom-up approach. A cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted, using decision analytic modelling. We compared the uptake and outcomes of people who received CIMT from health services that had received a CIMT implementation package, with those receiving standard upper limb therapy. An Australian health care system perspective was used in the model, over a 3-week time horizon (the average timeframe of a CIMT programme). All costs were calculated in Australian dollars (AUD). Inputs were derived from the ACTIveARM study and relevant literature. The Action Research Arm Test was used to measure arm outcomes. Sensitivity analyses assessed the impact of improving CIMT uptake, scale-up of the implementation package and resource adjustment, including a ‘best-case’ scenario analysis.ResultsThe total cost of delivering the implementation package to nine teams across five hospitals was $110,336.43 AUD over 18 months. The mean cost of delivering an individual CIMT programme was $1233.38 AUD per participant, and $936.03 AUD per participant for group-based programmes. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of individual CIMT programmes was $8052 AUD per additional person achieving meaningful improvement in arm function, and $6045 AUD for group-based CIMT. The ICER was most sensitive to reductions in staffing costs. In the ‘best-case’ scenario, the ICER for both individual and group-based CIMT was $245 AUD per additional person gaining a meaningful change in function.ConclusionTherapists improved CIMT uptake and delivery with the support of an implementation package, however cost effectiveness was unclear.Clinical Trial Registrationhttps://anzctr.org.au/Trial ID: ACTRN12617001147370.Supplementary InformationThe online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s41669-022-00323-9.

Exercise to prevent shoulder problems after breast cancer surgery: the PROSPER RCT.

Upper limb problems are common after breast cancer treatment. To investigate the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a structured exercise programme compared with usual care on upper limb function, health-related outcomes and costs in women undergoing breast cancer surgery. This was a two-arm, pragmatic, randomised controlled trial with embedded qualitative research, process evaluation and parallel economic analysis; the unit of randomisation was the individual (allocated ratio 1 : 1). Breast cancer centres, secondary care. Women aged ≥ 18 years who had been diagnosed with breast cancer and were at higher risk of developing shoulder problems. Women were screened to identify their risk status. All participants received usual-care information leaflets. Those randomised to exercise were referred to physiotherapy for an early, structured exercise programme (three to six face-to-face appointments that included strengthening, physical activity and behavioural change strategies). The primary outcome was upper limb function at 12 months as assessed using the Disabilities of Arm, Hand and Shoulder questionnaire. Secondary outcomes were function (Disabilities of Arm, Hand and Shoulder questionnaire subscales), pain, complications (e.g. wound-related complications, lymphoedema), health-related quality of life (e.g. EuroQol-5 Dimensions, five-level version; Short Form questionnaire-12 items), physical activity and health service resource use. The economic evaluation was expressed in terms of incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-year and incremental net monetary benefit gained from an NHS and Personal Social Services perspective. Participants and physiotherapists were not blinded to group assignment, but data collectors were blinded. Between 2016 and 2017, we randomised 392 participants from 17 breast cancer centres across England: 196 (50%) to the usual-care group and 196 (50%) to the exercise group. Ten participants (10/392; 3%) were withdrawn at randomisation and 32 (8%) did not provide complete baseline data. A total of 175 participants (89%) from each treatment group provided baseline data. Participants' mean age was 58.1 years (standard deviation 12.1 years; range 28-88 years). Most participants had undergone axillary node clearance surgery (327/392; 83%) and 317 (81%) had received radiotherapy. Uptake of the exercise treatment was high, with 181 out of 196 (92%) participants attending at least one physiotherapy appointment. Compliance with exercise was good: 143 out of 196 (73%) participants completed three or more physiotherapy sessions. At 12 months, 274 out of 392 (70%) participants returned questionnaires. Improvement in arm function was greater in the exercise group [mean Disabilities of Arm, Hand and Shoulder questionnaire score of 16.3 (standard deviation 17.6)] than in the usual-care group [mean Disabilities of Arm, Hand and Shoulder questionnaire score of 23.7 (standard deviation 22.9)] at 12 months for intention-to-treat (adjusted mean difference Disabilities of Arm, Hand and Shoulder questionnaire score of -7.81, 95% confidence interval -12.44 to -3.17; p = 0.001) and complier-average causal effect analyses (adjusted mean difference -8.74, 95% confidence interval -13.71 to -3.77; p ≤ 0.001). At 12 months, pain scores were lower and physical health-related quality of life was higher in the exercise group than in the usual-care group (Short Form questionnaire-12 items, mean difference 4.39, 95% confidence interval 1.74 to 7.04; p = 0.001). We found no differences in the rate of adverse events or lymphoedema over 12 months. The qualitative findings suggested that women found the exercise programme beneficial and enjoyable. Exercise accrued lower costs (-£387, 95% CI -£2491 to £1718) and generated more quality-adjusted life years (0.029, 95% CI 0.001 to 0.056) than usual care over 12 months. The cost-effectiveness analysis indicated that exercise was more cost-effective and that the results were robust to sensitivity analyses. Exercise was relatively cheap to implement (£129 per participant) and associated with lower health-care costs than usual care and improved health-related quality of life. Benefits may accrue beyond the end of the trial. Postal follow-up was lower than estimated; however, the study was adequately powered. No serious adverse events directly related to the intervention were reported. This trial provided robust evidence that referral for early, supported exercise after breast cancer surgery improved shoulder function in those at risk of shoulder problems and was associated with lower health-care costs than usual care and improved health-related quality of life. Future work should focus on the implementation of exercise programmes in clinical practice for those at highest risk of shoulder problems. This trial is registered as ISRCTN35358984. This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 26, No. 15. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.

Abstract WMP48: Targeting The Action Selection Network During Functional Arm Training After Stroke: A Feasibility Study

Introduction: Interventions aimed at improving arm function after stroke primarily focus on movement execution. Approaches that target a specific motor planning process during training have been suggested but not systematically studied. Action selection (AS), or selection of a motor response, is an important planning process with well described behavioral (planning time) and neural (frontal-parietal network) correlates. The purpose of this study was to determine the feasibility of adding AS demands to task-oriented arm training in individuals post-stroke. Methods: Thirty individuals with chronic stroke (59.3±11.0 years of age; 34.9±35.6 months post-stroke) and mild to moderate motor impairment (Fugl-Meyer motor score: 41.4±14.7) completed 15 sessions of task-oriented arm training that included AS demands through abstract visual cues; cues dictated movement task or movement direction/distance/height. AS difficulty was progressed throughout training. Before and after training, individuals completed a joystick-based AS task during functional MRI. Results: Despite the added planning demand, movement repetitions were high (averaged 190.1±25.4 per session). AS accuracy (correct response selection) averaged more than 90% across sessions, even as AS difficulty increased. AS response times and activation in the AS neural network decreased from pre- to post-training, especially in premotor and prefrontal cortices. Gains were seen in upper extremity function (Action Research Arm Test: Pre: 38.0±16.3; Post: 41.4±15.3) and hand-related quality of life (Stroke Impact Scale Hand Domain: Pre: 47.2±23.7; Post: 61.8±24.1). Conclusions: Overall, it was feasible to add AS demands to functional arm training after stroke. Targeted engagement of the AS neural network through the addition of AS demands to arm training may challenge this component of the motor network in a manner that improves motor planning performance, upper extremity function, and neural resource utilization.