Improve Trauma Care Research Articles

Natural Language Processing-Based Deep Learning to Predict the Loss of Consciousness Event Using Emergency Department Text Records

The increasing adoption of electronic medical records (EMRs) presents a unique opportunity to enhance trauma care through data-driven insights. However, extracting meaningful and actionable information from unstructured clinical text remains a significant challenge. Addressing this gap, this study focuses on the application of natural language processing (NLP) techniques to extract injury-related variables and classify trauma patients based on the presence of loss of consciousness (LOC). A dataset of 23,308 trauma patient EMRs, including pre-diagnosis and post-diagnosis free-text notes, was analyzed using a bilingual (English and Korean) pre-trained RoBERTa model. The patients were categorized into four groups based on the presence of LOC and head trauma. To address class imbalance in LOC labeling, deep learning models were trained with weighted loss functions, achieving a high area under the curve (AUC) of 0.91. Local Interpretable Model-agnostic Explanations analysis further demonstrated the model’s ability to identify critical terms related to head injuries and consciousness. NLP can effectively identify LOC in trauma patients’ EMRs, with weighted loss functions addressing data imbalances. These findings can inform the development of AI tools to improve trauma care and decision-making.

Analysis of Fatal Blunt Force Head Injuries in cases of Road Traffic Accidents- A study from Civil Hospital, Ahmedabad

Road traffic accidents are a leading cause of death and disability worldwide, with significant implications in India due to its vast and diverse population. Post-mortem studies provide crucial insights into the epidemiology, causes and characteristics of fatal head injuries, informing prevention and management strategies in case of road traffic accidents. This study aims to analyse the epidemiological profile of head injury cases subjected to post mortem, identifying patterns in demographic factors, causes of injury and anatomical characteristics of blunt force head trauma. In this study, analysis was done for blunt force head injury in road traffic accident cases brought to the mortuary of Civil Hospital, B.J Medical College, Ahmedabad, over a one year period from January to December (2019). Among 1138 cases of road traffic accidents, 847 cases with head injury were selected. Data on age, gender, cause of injury, type and location of blunt force head trauma and associated injuries were collected, analysed and compared with other similar studies. Of 847 head injury cases, majority were males and age group of 21 – 40 Years. 43 % of study population died within 1 hour. Predominantly two wheeler’s were involved in RTA and without safety measures. 43.5% of cases showed laceration as external injury and 53.4% of study population showed linear fracture of skull. This study on blunt head injury cases reveals critical epidemiological trends, emphasizing the need for enhanced road safety measures and public awareness. The findings underscore the importance of targeted prevention strategies and improved trauma care to reduce fatalities from head injuries in India.

Effects of major trauma care organisation on mortality in a European level 1 trauma centre: A retrospective analysis of 2016-2023.

The centralisation of care for trauma patients in trauma centres, alongside the creation of inclusive trauma networks, has proven to reduce mortality. In Europe, such structured trauma programs and trauma networks are in development. To describe the aetiology and evolution of in-hospital mortality in a developing European level 1 trauma centre, to determine the early effect of trauma care reorganisation on mortality and to identify the areas for future investments in trauma care. This retrospective analysis included the calculation of the standardised mortality ratio (SMR), the time to in-hospital death and the cause of in-hospital death of all primary major trauma admissions to the Antwerp University Hospital from 2016 to 2023. A total of 1470 patients was included with a crude mortality of 16.4 %, a median Revised Injury Severity Classification II (RISC II) adjusted mortality of 1.47 %, and a SMR of 1.12. A limitation of care directive was registered for 18.1 % of the patients. The causes of in-hospital death were traumatic brain injury (TBI) in 60 %, haemorrhagic shock in 15 %, organ failure in 10 %, miscellaneous in 14 % and unknown in 1 %. Sixty percent died in the first 48 h of hospital admission (mainly due to TBI and haemorrhagic shock) and 27 % died after more than seven days (mainly due to organ failure and TBI). In 24 % of the deceased patients with severe TBI, a non-TBI related cause of death was found. Overall, the SMR showed a nonsignificant decreasing trend, with a significant decrease of the SMR in the highest risk group (RISCII > 75 %) and a nonsignificant increase in the lowest risk group (RISC II <15 %). The standardised mortality ratio declined over a period of 8 years, even though the SMR increased nonsignificantly in the lowest risk-adjusted mortality group. Future analysis of this subgroup could clarify whether this trend is due to an increase of limitation of care directives and if these deaths could have been prevented with improved trauma care. There might be opportunities to increase the survival of patients with severe TBI who have a non-TBI cause of death.

3.Y.2. Road traffic injuries, disability burden and implications for compensation schemes in Europe

Abstract Reducing traffic fatalities and injuries is a complex challenge, but it is one that is of paramount importance for public health and safety worldwide. In recent years, there have been improvements in trauma care and injury prevention efforts, which reduced mortality rates and increased survival after serious injury. However, an increased heterogeneity in recovery times is observed with survivors of road traffic injuries differing in their adjustment compared to other traumas in terms of symptoms’ onset, variability and chronicity. The recovery trajectory seems to vary widely with a large percentage of survivors in need of extensive time periods for full recovery. Attention has now been shifted towards the adverse effects of non-fatal injuries on functional, mental health, economic and societal outcomes. The capacity of a person to continue functioning, inability to work, sickness absence and reliance on welfare benefits to compensate for loss of income are some of the injury-related long-term consequences, causing great concern for health and social security systems across Europe, as they have been shown to account for more than one third of total road traffic incident costs. These figures fail to include individuals who sustain “minor” injuries, which do not require hospitalisation, yet still impair their ability to work. Despite the rapidly growing epidemiological and clinical attention, there are still several issues missing from research, policy and practice. A universal definition of recovery after a road traffic injury is still missing, and this has been seen as critical for improved understanding of risk factors of poor recovery as well as improved identification of those in need of welfare benefits. Furthermore, long-term sickness absence and disability following road traffic injury in Europe is still understudied and evidence on the different return to work pathways and compensation schemes is scarce. Evidence is still limited on the context in which return to work occurs, the injury profiles most dependent on long term compensation schemes and the policy settings of injury compensation schemes that impact return to work outcomes post injury. Data availability and data linkage issues often cause misclassification errors when granting disability pensions and this remains unattended long after an injury. Welfare benefits are often poorly connected with the injury or other medical diagnoses and this makes it difficult to assess the contribution of injuries on disability pensions and other welfare benefits, especially in comorbid and multimorbid conditions. The current workshop aims to improve our understanding of the long-term consequences and the challenges faced by those injured in road traffic injuries and aid the development of interventions that seek to enable sustained recovery, and help inform policy and practice of healthcare and injury compensation systems. Key messages • Timely access to quality healthcare, rehabilitation therapies, and assistive technologies can significantly improve outcomes and reduce the strain on social security and compensation systems. • Ensuring equitable access to social security benefits for injured individuals, requires efficient compensation schemes that recognize the full impact of the disability on individuals’ life.

Exploring the long-term disability outcomes in Trauma patients: study protocol

ObjectivesTrauma registries are essential tools for improving trauma care quality and efficiency, but many fail to capture long-term patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Focusing on these outcomes is crucial for understanding the extent of disability patients experience and identifying potential post-discharge interventions to optimize recovery. Studies reflecting the experience from low- and middle-income countries in this area are limited. Therefore, we aim to develop a digital trauma registry in Pakistan to prospectively capture patient-reported outcome measures at one, three, six, and twelve months post-injury.MethodsWe will develop and implement a digital trauma registry at two tertiary care facilities in Karachi, Pakistan: Aga Khan University Hospital and Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Center. The registry will include all admitted adult trauma patients (≥ 18 years). Data collection will be conducted digitally using tablets, with mortality, level of disability, functional status, and quality of life as primary outcomes. Follow-up data will be collected through telephone interviews with patients and caregivers. We will employ descriptive statistics to summarize participant’s socio-demographic and clinical characteristics. Additionally, we will perform survival analysis using Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazard models and utilize mixed-effects linear regression to adjust for potential confounders for primary outcomes.DiscussionThe trauma registry will fill the current gap in knowledge regarding long-term outcomes among trauma patients in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). This study will delineate future direction for capturing post-discharge data, enhancing our understanding of recovery, and informing the design of interventions aimed at improving long-term outcomes.

Forensic Pathologists and Clinical Trauma Reviews: Performance Improvement, Public Health, and a Concise Autopsy Documentation Guide.

As a powerful tool for discovering and documenting injury, the forensic autopsy has been incorporated into trauma care quality improvement. Autopsy findings are used to determine the Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) and Injury Severity Score (ISS) to assess a patient's trauma severity. Clinical trauma services use autopsy reports to educate, improve patient care, and strengthen the information used in epidemiological and injury prevention studies. However, there is sometimes a disconnect between the forensic pathologist's injury descriptions and the information needed by the trauma service and for AIS/ISS coding.We formed a collaboration between forensic pathologists and trauma teams to improve this communication. Accordingly, we describe injuries that are commonly overlooked or poorly described in autopsy reports, useful injury terminology, opportunities for trauma care improvement revealed by autopsies, and which medical examiner/coroner cases will most benefit from attention to specific injury details. We demonstrate how differences in injury description impact AIS/ISS results, and distill the detailed AIS manual into a pragmatic, concise, "quick reference" autopsy-directed guide for the forensic pathologist. Collaborations between trauma teams and forensic pathologists benefit each other and help communicate autopsy findings in a more clinically useful way to stakeholders to further benefit the living.

Survival of the fastest? A descriptive analysis of severely injured trauma patients primarily admitted or secondarily transferred to major trauma centers in a Danish inclusive trauma system

BackgroundTrauma systems are crucial for enhancing survival and quality of life for trauma patients. Understanding trauma triage and patient outcomes is essential for optimizing resource allocation and trauma care.AimsThe aim was to explore prehospital trauma triage in Region Zealand, Denmark. Specifically, characteristics for patients who were either primarily admitted or secondarily transferred to major trauma centers were described.MethodsA retrospective descriptive study of severely injured trauma patients was conducted from January 2017 to December 2021.ResultsThe study comprised 744 patients including 55.6% primary and 44.4% secondary patients. Overall, men accounted for 70.2% of patients, and 66.1% were aged 18–65 years. The secondary patients included more women—34.2% versus 26.3% and a higher proportion of Injury Severity Score of ≥ 15—59.6% versus 47.8%, compared to primary patients. 30-day survival was higher for secondary patients—92.7% versus 87%. Medical dispatchers assessed urgency as Emergency level A for 98.1% of primary patients and 86.3% for secondary patients. Physician-staffed prehospital units attended primary patients first more frequently—17.1% versus 3.5%. Response times were similar, but time at scene was longer for primary patients whereas time from injury to arrival at a major trauma center was longer for secondary patients.ConclusionsSecondary trauma patients had higher Injury Severity Scores and better survival rates. They were considered less urgent by medical dispatchers and less frequently assessed by physician-staffed units. Prospective quality data are needed for further investigation of optimal triage and continuous quality improvement in trauma care.

Closing the Trauma Performance Improvement Loop With In-situ Simulation

IntroductionContinuous performance improvement (PI) programs are essential for excellent trauma care. We incorporated PI identified from trauma cases into an in-situ simulation-based medical education curriculum. This is a proof-of-concept study exploring the efficacy of high-fidelity pediatric trauma simulations in improving self-reported provider comfort and knowledge for identified trauma PI issues. MethodsThis study was performed at an American College of Surgeons-verified Level I Pediatric Trauma Center. Several clinical issues were identified during the trauma PI process, including management of elevated intracranial pressure in traumatic brain injury and the use of massive transfusion protocol. These issues were incorporated into a simulation-based medical education curriculum and high-fidelity in-situ trauma mock codes were held. In-depth debriefing sessions were led by a senior faculty member after the simulations. The study participants completed pre- and postsimulation surveys. Univariate statistics are presented. ResultsTwenty three providers completed surveys for the pediatric trauma simulations. Self-reported provider confidence Likert scale improved from pre- to postsimulation (P = 0.02) and trauma experience and knowledge scores improved from 82% presimulation to 93% postsimulation (P = 0.02). ConclusionsHigh-fidelity pediatric trauma simulations enhance provider comfort, knowledge, and experience in trauma scenarios. By integrating high-fidelity trauma simulations to address clinical issues identified in the trauma PI process, provider education can be reinforced and practiced in a controlled environment to improve trauma care. Future studies evaluating the implementation of clinical pathways and patient outcomes are needed to demonstrate the effectiveness of simulations in PI pathways.

Evaluation of just-in-time trauma training for international surgical military preparedness at a US Civilian Levell Trauma Center: A proof of concept.

Increasing global conflicts continue to heighten the need for increased focus on preparedness for military physicians and surgeons. Simulation has recently been adopted by civilian surgical trainees to offset the problem of increased work hour restrictions and shift the current focus toward minimally invasive techniques. We hypothesized that just-in-time trauma training, incorporating both focused clinical and simulated experience at our civilian Level I Trauma Center, would increase the competence and confidence of international military physicians in trauma care. We performed a feasibility study of five Ukrainian physicians (four surgeons and one anesthesiologist) undergoing an intensive 2-week trauma course taught by 25 American clinicians. The training consisted of several previously validated courses including Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS®), Advanced Surgical Skills for Exposure in Trauma (ASSE'J®), Advanced Trauma Operative Management (ATO ), and Basic Endovascular Skills for Trauma (BES'J®), among several additional simulated and clinical experiences. Pre- and post-course surveys were analyzed using paired t-tests to assess improvement in trauma care. All five physicians had significant improvement in confidence following the completion of the course, including the management of injuries to the neck, chest, abdomen, and extremities. Additionally, each clinician significantly improved in their confidence to perform common ATLS procedures and resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta skills. Overall, the mean confidence over all survey responses improved significantly following the completion of the course, 2.28 (precourse confid ence range 1.25-3.35) to 3.66 (post-course confidence range 2.95-4.22), p-value = 0.002. All five Ukrainian physicians successfully passed the corresponding post-tests and were certified as having completed ATLS, ATOM, ASSET, and BEST Conclusions: A military and civilian partnership in trauma preparedness is feasible to improve surgeon confidence in trauma care.

Consensus recommendations for acute trauma care & outcomes in LMICs from the transdisciplinary research, advocacy & implementation network for trauma in India.

Background & objectives Injuries profoundly impact global health, with substantial deaths and disabilities, especially in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). This paper presents strategic consensus from the Transdisciplinary Research, Advocacy, and Implementation Network for Trauma in India (TRAIN Trauma India) symposium, advocating for enhanced, system-level trauma care to address this challenge. Methods Five working groups conducted separate literature reviews on pre-hospital trauma care, in-hospital trauma resuscitation and training, trauma systems, trauma registries, and India's Towards Improving Trauma Care Outcomes (TITCO) registry. Using a Delphi approach, the TRAIN Trauma India Symposium generated consensus statements and recommendations for interventions to streamline trauma care and reduce preventable trauma mortality in India and LMICs. Experts prioritized interventions based on cost and difficulty. Results An expert panel agreed on four pre-hospital consensus statements, eight hospital resuscitation consensus statements, six system-level consensus statements, and six trauma registry consensus statements. The expert panel recommended six pre-hospital interventions, four hospital resuscitation interventions, nine system-level interventions, and seven trauma registry interventions applicable to the Indian context. Of these, 14 interventions were ranked as low cost/low difficulty, five high cost/low difficulty, five low cost/high difficulty, and three high cost/high difficulty. Interpretation & conclusions This consensus underscores the urgent need for integrated and efficient trauma systems to reduce preventable mortality, emphasizing the importance of comprehensive care that includes community engagement and robust pre-hospital and acute hospital trauma care pathways. It highlights the critical role of inclusive, system-wide approaches, from enhancing pre-hospital care and in-hospital resuscitation to implementing effective trauma registries to improve outcomes and streamline care across contexts.

Use of resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) for trauma and its performance in Japan over the past 18 years: a nationwide descriptive study

BackgroundResuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) has been used to control massive hemorrhages. Although there is no consensus on the efficacy of REBOA, it remains an option as a bridging therapy in non-trauma centers where trauma surgeons are not available. To better understand the current landscape of REBOA application, we examined changes in its usage, target population, and treatment outcomes in Japan, where immediate hemostasis procedures sometimes cannot be performed.MethodsThis retrospective observational study used the Japan Trauma Data Bank data. All cases in which REBOA was performed between January 2004 and December 2021 were included. The primary outcome was the in-hospital mortality rate. We analyzed mortality trends over time according to the number of cases, number of centers, severity of injury, and overall and subgroup mortality associated with REBOA usage. We performed a logistic analysis of mortality trends over time, adjusting for probability of survival based on the trauma and injury severity score.ResultsOverall, 2557 patients were treated with REBOA and were deemed eligible for inclusion. The median age of the participants was 55 years, and male patients constituted 65.3% of the study population. Blunt trauma accounted for approximately 93.0% of the cases. The number of cases and facilities that used REBOA increased until 2019. While the injury severity score and revised trauma score did not change throughout the observation period, the hospital mortality rate decreased from 91.3 to 50.9%. The REBOA group without severe head or spine injuries showed greater improvement in mortality than the all-patient group using REBOA and all-trauma patient group. The greatest improvement in mortality was observed in patients with systolic blood pressure ≥ 80 mmHg. The adjusted odds ratios for hospital mortality steadily declined, even after adjusting for the probability of survival.ConclusionsWhile there was no significant change in patient severity, mortality of patients treated with REBOA decreased over time. Further research is required to determine the reasons for these improvements in trauma care.

The Mental Abuse Matters Virtual Reality Project: creative practice in cinematic VR and immersive sound

ABSTRACT This article discusses my practice work The Mental Abuse Matters VR Project; a live action narrative drama and Virtual Reality experience where the user is an embodied victim, experiencing an episode of emotional abuse in a domestic setting. Immersive sound is used to replicate emotions in the body such as shame, dread, anxiety, humiliation and panic in the user and to represent inner thoughts, memories and states of dissociation, with the goal of moving beyond language towards a visceral narrative. This is a prototype intervention that aims to be used as an empathy training tool for frontline Health and Social Care and Justice sector staff to improve trauma care, and potentially a therapeutic VR experience for victims and perpetrators of mental abuse. The article aims to discuss the development, creative practice and planned dissemination of this pilot VR experience, evaluating it in the context of traditional study methods and existing health and social care interventions in VR.

Effect of trauma quality improvement initiatives on outcomes and costs at community hospitals: A scoping review

BackgroundDue to complex geography and resource constraints, trauma patients are often initially transported to community or rural facilities rather than a larger Level I or II trauma center. The objective of this scoping review was to synthesize evidence on interventions that improved the quality of trauma care and/or reduced healthcare costs at non-Level I or II facilities. MethodsA scoping review was performed to identify studies implementing a Quality Improvement (QI) initiative at a non-major trauma center (i.e., non-Level I or II trauma center [or equivalent]). We searched 3 electronic databases (MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL) and the grey literature (relevant networks, organizations/associations). Methodological quality was evaluated using NIH and JBI study quality assessment tools. Studies were included if they evaluated the effect of implementing a trauma care QI initiative on one or more of the following: 1) trauma outcomes (mortality, morbidity); 2) system outcomes (e.g., length of stay [LOS], transfer times, provider factors); 3) provider knowledge or perception; or 4) healthcare costs. Pediatric trauma, pre-hospital and tele-trauma specific studies were excluded. ResultsOf 1046 data sources screened, 36 were included for full review (29 journal articles, 7 abstracts/posters without full text). Educational initiatives including the Rural Trauma Team Development Course and the Advanced Trauma Life Support course were the most common QI interventions investigated. Study outcomes included process metrics such as transfer time to tertiary care and hospital LOS, along with measures of provider perception and knowledge. Improvement in mortality was reported in a single study evaluating the impact of establishing a dedicated trauma service at a community hospital. ConclusionsOur review captured a broad spectrum of trauma QI projects implemented at non-major trauma centers. Educational interventions did result in process outcome improvements and high rates of self-reported improvements in trauma care. Given the heterogeneous capabilities of community and rural hospitals, there is no panacea for trauma QI at these facilities. Future research should focus on patient outcomes like mortality and morbidity, and locally relevant initiatives.

When Equality Is Not Equity: The Ethics of Access to Trauma Care A Surgical Perspective.

The purpose of this surgical perspective is to describe the trauma care needs of the South Side of Chicago and the creation of an adult trauma center at the University of Chicago Medicine and associated hospital-based violence intervention program. Traumatic injury is a leading cause of death and disability in the US. Disparities across the continuum of trauma care exist, which are often rooted in the social determinants of health. Trauma center distribution is critical to timely treatment and should be based on the trauma needs of the area. The previous trauma ecosystem of Chicago was incongruent with the concentration of violent injuries on the south and west sides of the city leading to a fallacy of distributive justice. A descriptive analysis of community partners, trauma program leadership, trauma surgeons and the violence intervention program director was performed. The UCM trauma center opened in May 2018 and has since been one of the busiest trauma centers in the country with a 40% penetrating trauma rate. There have been significant reductions in patient transport time on the South Side up to 8.9 minutes (P<0.001). The violence intervention program employs credible messengers with lived experience representing the community and has engaged over 8000 patients since 2018 developing both community-based and medical legal partnerships. The persistent efforts of the community and key stakeholders led to a system change improving trauma care for the South Side of Chicago.

Massive transfusion protocol reactivation as a novel marker of physician team under-triage after injury.

Large trauma centers have protocols for the assessment of injury and triaging of care with attempts to over-triage to ensure adequate care for all patients. We noted that a significant number of patients undergo a second massive transfusion protocol (MTP) activation in the first 24 h of care and conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients involved over a 3-year period. Transfusion service records of MTP activations 2019-2021 were linked to Trauma Registry records and divided into cohorts receiving a single versus a reactivation of the MTP. Time of activation and amounts of blood products issued were linked to demographic, injury severity, and outcome data. Categorical and continuous data were compared between cohorts with chi-squared, Fisher's, and Wilcoxan tests as appropriate, and multivariable regression models were used to seek interactions (p < .05). MTP activation was recorded for 1884 acute trauma patients over our 3-year study period, 142 of whom (7.5%) had reactivation. Factors associated with reactivation included older age (46 vs. 40 years), higher injury severity score (ISS, 27 vs. 22), leg injuries, and presentation during morning shift change (5-7 a.m., 3.3% vs. 7.7%). Patients undergoing MTP reactivation used more RBCs (5 U vs. 2 U) and had more ICU days (3 vs. 2). Older patients and those presenting during shift change are at risk for failure to recognize their complex injury patterns and under-triage for trauma care. The fidelity and granularity of transfusion service records can provide unique opportunities for quality assessment and improvement in trauma care.

Platelets in Hemostasis, Thrombosis, and Inflammation After Major Trauma.

Trauma currently accounts for 10% of the total global burden of disease and over 5 million deaths per year, making it a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Although recent advances in early resuscitation have improved early survival from critical injury, the mortality rate in patients with major hemorrhage approaches 50% even in mature trauma systems. A major determinant of clinical outcomes from a major injury is a complex, dynamic hemostatic landscape. Critically injured patients frequently present to the emergency department with an acute traumatic coagulopathy that increases mortality from bleeding, yet, within 48 to 72 hours after injury will switch from a hypocoagulable to a hypercoagulable state with increased risk of venous thromboembolism and multiple organ dysfunction. This review will focus on the role of platelets in these processes. As effectors of hemostasis and thrombosis, they are central to each phase of recovery from injury, and our understanding of postinjury platelet biology has dramatically advanced over the past decade. This review describes our current knowledge of the changes in platelet behavior that occur following major trauma, the mechanisms by which these changes develop, and the implications for clinical outcomes. Importantly, supported by research in other disease settings, this review also reflects the emerging role of thromboinflammation in trauma including cross talk between platelets, innate immune cells, and coagulation. We also address the unresolved questions and significant knowledge gaps that remain, and finally highlight areas that with the further study will help deliver further improvements in trauma care.

Total Number of Rtas that were Brought to the Gujranwala Teaching Hospital's Trauma Center, along with their Results

Background: Trauma, particularly arising from road traffic accidents (RTAs), is a significant public health issue worldwide, with a notably high incidence in Pakistan. The vulnerability to traumatic injuries is exacerbated by socio-economic, environmental, and infrastructural factors. Young males are disproportionately affected, reflecting societal roles and risk behaviors. The efficiency of trauma care, influenced by the location and resources of trauma centers, plays a crucial role in patient outcomes. Objective: This study aims to assess the patterns, causes, and outcomes of trauma cases treated at the Gujranwala Teaching Hospital (GTH) trauma center, with a focus on identifying demographic trends, predominant injury mechanisms, and the effectiveness of trauma care facilities. Methods: An institution-based cross-sectional study was conducted from November 2021 to February 2022 at the GTH trauma center. Ethical approval was obtained from the Department of Emergency Medicine Ethics Committee at GMC Teaching Hospital. Data were collected using a WHO-guided pre-tested form, documenting sociodemographic profiles, clinical profiles, injury mechanisms, and outcomes. The study involved 813 trauma patients, with data analysis performed using SPSS version 25. Descriptive and inferential statistics were employed to analyze patient demographics, injury patterns, and outcomes. Results: The study comprised 813 patients, predominantly male (75.3%). The median age was 33 years, ranging from 1.5 to 85 years. RTAs were the most common injury mechanism (78.6%), primarily affecting passengers (70.9%) and pedestrians (29.1%). Head injuries were the most frequent anatomical site of injury (45.75%). The triage categories showed 73.76% of patients in the 'Yellow' category. The overall mortality prevalence was 3.6%. Conclusion: The study highlights the high prevalence of RTAs as a cause of trauma, particularly among young males. The findings underscore the need for improved trauma care facilities, stricter enforcement of traffic safety laws, and public awareness campaigns on road safety. Establishing well-equipped trauma centers near highways and enhancing prehospital care could significantly reduce trauma-related fatalities.

A population-based epidemiological and health economic analysis of fracture-related infection.

The aim of this study was to perform the first population-based description of the epidemiological and health economic burden of fracture-related infection (FRI). This is a retrospective cohort study of operatively managed orthopaedic trauma patients from 1 January 2007 to 31 December 2016, performed in Queensland, Australia. Record linkage was used to develop a person-centric, population-based dataset incorporating routinely collected administrative, clinical, and health economic information. The FRI group consisted of patients with International Classification of Disease 10th Revision diagnosis codes for deep infection associated with an implanted device within two years following surgery, while all others were deemed not infected. Demographic and clinical variables, as well as healthcare utilization costs, were compared. There were 111,402 patients operatively managed for orthopaedic trauma, with 2,775 of these (2.5%) complicated by FRI. The development of FRI had a statistically significant association with older age, male sex, residing in rural/remote areas, Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander background, lower socioeconomic status, road traffic accident, work-related injuries, open fractures, anatomical region (lower limb, spine, pelvis), high injury severity, requiring soft-tissue coverage, and medical comorbidities (univariate analysis). Patients with FRI had an eight-times longer median inpatient length of stay (24 days vs 3 days), and a 2.8-times higher mean estimated inpatient hospitalization cost (AU$56,565 vs AU$19,773) compared with uninfected patients. The total estimated inpatient cost of the FRI cohort to the healthcare system was AU$156.9 million over the ten-year period. The results of this study advocate for improvements in trauma care and infection management, address social determinants of health, and highlight the upside potential to improve prevention and treatment strategies.

Classification of trauma-related preventable death; protocol of a Delphi procedure.

Trauma-related (preventable) death is used to evaluate the management and quality of trauma care worldwide. Therefore, it is necessary to identify fatalities in the trauma care population and assess them on preventability. However, the definition on trauma-related preventable death lacks validity due to differences in terminology and classifications. This study aims to reach consensus on the definition of trauma-related preventable death by performing a Delphi procedure, thereby, improving the assessment of trauma-related preventable death and thereby enhancing the quality of trauma care. Based on the results of a recently performed systematic review Hakkenbrak (2021). The definitions used to describe trauma-related preventable death could be divided into four categories: 1) Clinical definition based on panel review or expert opinion, 2) Trauma prediction algorithm, 3) Clinical definition with an additional trauma prediction algorithm and 4) Others (e.g., errors in care or detailed clinical definition). A three round, electronic Delphi study will be performed in the Netherlands to reach consensus. Experts from the department of Trauma surgery, Neurosurgery, Forensic medicine, Anaesthesiology and Emergency medicine, of the designated Level 1 trauma centres in the Netherlands, will be invited to participate. In the first round the panel will comment on the composed categories and trauma prediction algorithms. In the second and third round a feedback report will be presented and the questions with disagreement will be retested. The identification and assessment of trauma-related preventable death is necessary to evaluate and improve trauma care. Therefore, a valid, fair, and applicable definition of trauma-related preventable death is required. The Delphi technique is utilized to reach group consensus to obtain a scientifically valid definition of trauma-related preventable death.

GERIATRICS TRAUMA CO-MANAGEMENT: PRELIMINARY DESCRIPTIVE DATA FROM A SINGLE ACADEMIC INSTITUTION

Abstract Background Traumatic injuries cause higher mortality and complications in older patients than in younger individuals. Orthogeriatric co-management programs improve outcomes and quality of care and may be a model for trauma management. We theorized that geriatricians could improve trauma care in older adults with the early identification of geriatric syndromes. Methods A retrospective chart review was conducted for patients aged &amp;gt; 65 years admitted to the trauma surgery service at a Level 2 trauma center between October 2022 and January 2023, who were co-managed by geriatricians as part of a pilot program. Results 67 patients were included in this study. The mean age was 81 (65-99), and 38% were male. The most common injuries were rib fractures (39%), subdural hematomas (32%), and spinal fractures (10%). Geriatric syndromes identified and managed by a geriatrician included frailty (47%), major or minor cognitive impairment (48%), delirium (19%), malnutrition (13%), and polypharmacy (65%), with a mean number of 6.7 home medications. As per Beers criteria, 63% of patients were taking inappropriate medications. Geriatrician-led interventions in advance care planning included identification and documentation of healthcare proxies (i.e., increased to 87% from 11% on admission) and goals of care conversations (54%). Conclusions Given the high prevalence of geriatric syndromes and complex medical and social needs in older patients with trauma, geriatric co-management may enable timely diagnosis and treatment of conditions that cause poor outcomes. Further research is warranted to assess the impact of geriatric co-management models on the long-term clinical outcomes in older individuals after injury.