Results Of Implementation Research Articles

Implementation evaluation of a school-based intervention on HPV vaccination (the PrevHPV study)

Abstract Background HPV vaccine coverage (VC) remains lower than expected in many countries, particularly France. We developed and evaluated the PrevHPV multicomponent intervention to improve HPV VC among French adolescents. We evaluated the implementation of the school-based components of the intervention. Methods We carried out a mixed-method study embedded in a cluster randomized controlled trial (July 2021-April 2022; 14/25 French school districts). The cluster was the municipality (n = 91). The school-based components of the intervention were ‘education and motivation’ and ‘at-school vaccination’. Quantitative data were collected through standardized activity reports and self-administered questionnaires; the implementation outcomes were fidelity, dose, reach, acceptability and sustainability. Qualitative data were collected through semistructured group interviews with school staff and analyzed using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. Results We found high rates for: fidelity (e.g., 69% of the targeted classes had two educational sessions and 89% of schools invited all pupils for at-school vaccination, as planned); acceptability (e.g., pupils’ participation satisfying in 90% of the sessions, 96% of vaccinated pupils and 78% of school staff satisfied with at-school vaccination); and sustainability (e.g., respectively 91% and 76% of schools considered conducting sessions and vaccination days during the following year). However, the withdrawal of 1/3 of schools before the trial started and difficulties in mobilizing parents negatively impacted dose and reach. Several facilitators and barriers influenced the implementation of the components; they were related to the components’ design, the characteristics of both the external and internal environment of the school, the numerous stakeholders and individuals involved, and the implementation strategies used. Conclusions These results can guide policy making on school-based HPV vaccine promotion in France and Europe. Key messages • The PrevHPV study is supported by the French health authorities and conducted by a multidisciplinary consortium to tackle a long-lasting public health concern in France. • These findings have practical implications for implementing effective and acceptable school-based interventions in real life to improve HPV vaccine uptake and reduce HPV-associated burdens.

Community Health Worker Service: addressing the needs of Gypsy/Travellers in Scotland

Abstract Background Members of the Gypsy/Traveller community in the United Kingdom face significant health inequalities compared to the general population, including lower life expectancy, higher rates of morbidity and suicide and poorer infant and child outcomes. This study evaluated the implementation of community-based lay workers in Scotland - the Gypsy/Traveller Community Health Worker (CHW) service. Methods This multi-method qualitative study (December 2021 to August 2023) included 16 individual interviews, five focus groups, one workshop, two informal discussions, and one site visit. Participants were stakeholders, CHWs, and members of the Gypsy/Traveller community. Additionally, 116 documents were analysed. The framework method, Proctor’s implementation outcomes and thematic analysis were used for data analysis. Results CHWs reached approximately 1,000 individuals across six National Health Services (NHS) Boards. The implementation outcomes showed that the intervention was accepted and feasible. A third-sector organization (Black and Minority Ethnic Carers of People Project - MECOPP), played a crucial role in successfully delivering the CHW service. This innovative intervention employed members of the Gypsy/Traveller community as lay healthcare workers to break down barriers to accessing healthcare and other services (e.g., uptake of cervical screening, vaccination, housing, and sanitation). The CHWs were trusted, ensured healthcare information was culturally appropriate and successfully addressed discriminatory behaviours in health and social care. Limited resources pose challenges to the sustainability of the service. Conclusions The Gypsy/Traveller CHW service enhanced prevention, acted as a bridge between communities and health systems and addressed the wider determinants of health. The Gypsy/Traveller community still faces discriminatory, racist, and stigmatising behaviours, which further impede the quality, delivery, and accessibility of care. Key messages • The Community Health Worker service was acceptable and feasible in the Gypsy/Traveller community, acting as a bridge between community and health systems and increasing access to services. • Community Health Worker Service is an important strategy for delivering healthcare support through their sector organizations to address historical discrimination against minority ethnic groups.

Using critical reflection as formative assessment of learning quality of general English at Nguyen Tat Thanh University

The present study investigates the use of critical reflection as formative assessment of learning outcomes in the context of English as a foreign language. It aims to explore learners’ perception of how effective critical reflection is on the learning quality of knowledge and skills outcomes. Data was obtained from a purposeful sample of 113 participants who used critical reflection to assess their own learning quality against lesson learning outcomes. A questionnaire was employed to elicit responses on the learners’ experience of using critical reflection as well as self-assessment on their own learning quality. The results from pair samples t-test revealed that the participants’ use of critical reflection resulted in differing extents of achievement of knowledge outcomes and skills outcomes. While the findings suggest the helpfulness of the critical reflection as a means of self-assessment, they raised a question of designing critical reflection in a way it is better suited to different types of learning outcomes for optimal implementation in English classrooms.

A Qualitative Study of Implementation Outcomes of a Group-Based Intervention for Immigrant Parents

Abstract Background Inequities in service utilization between immigrant families and native populations have emerged within the Nordic welfare countries, highlighting the need for culturally sensitive parenting support. Despite the proven efficacy of parenting interventions, their implementation phases have not been adequately addressed in extant implementation research, particularly regarding structural racism and inequities. This study aims to contribute to the literature from an implementation perspective by describing a pilot of ‘Being a Parent in Finland,’ a culturally sensitive group-based intervention for migrant parents. Its specific focus is on investigating barriers to and facilitators of implementation outcomes from the perspectives of service providers. Methods The qualitative data consisted of thematic interviews (N = 6) with service providers (N = 9) compiled at distinct phases of the pilot from 2021 to 2023. In addition, data triangulation was utilized through document analysis of 125 pages of various documents regarding the pilot as a supplementary data collection method. Content analysis was conducted on the data using Atlas.ti 23. Results The findings stress the alignment of the target group, service placement, and preventive measures for enhancing parenting intervention’s acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility. Implicit objectives, such as perceiving the target group as ‘at-risk,’ can impede intervention success and exacerbate stigmatization of the target group. Culture- and context-specific adaptations, and community engagement foster parental trust and intervention accessibility. Conclusions The findings underscore the significance of congruent objectives, community engagement, and adaptive iterations in preventive parenting interventions. Advocating for these elements in implementation strategies is crucial for reducing stigmatization and enhancing equity and efficacy in services tailored to minority parents. Key messages • Acknowledging equity in both implementation research and strategies is paramount. • Implementing trust-building is crucial for culturally sensitive parenting interventions.

Implementation of digital patient decision support tools for Atrial Fibrillation treatment: systematic review

Abstract Background/ Introduction Treating atrial fibrillation (AF) involves complex decisions. Digital patient decision-support tools can facilitate shared decision making by significantly reducing decisional conflict and improving patient knowledge [1,2]. Yet, implementation in clinical practice is lagging [3]. Purpose To systematically review trials of digital patient decision-support tools for AF treatment decisions, focusing on factors influencing their implementation in clinical practice. Methods We conducted a systematic review following Cochrane methods. EMBASE, MEDLINE and Scopus were searched from 2005 to 2023. Eligible randomised controlled trials and quasi-experimental trials that evaluated digital patient decision-support tools for AF treatment decisions were included. Two independent reviewers screened title and abstract, extracted data and assessed risk of bias. The implementation outcomes included a description of when and how the tool was used, as well as its characteristics and user satisfaction. Results Thirteen articles reporting on eleven studies (5 RCTs and 6 quasi-experimental trials) met the inclusion criteria (2,714 participants; mean age 71±4.2 years; 26% women; 92% with non-valvular AF, remaining not reported). Risk of bias was low for 2 studies, moderate for one and high for seven studies. All tools (n=11) focused on anticoagulation choice (1: warfarin vs no warfarin; 1: aspirin vs warfarin; 7: Direct Oral Anticoagulants (DOAC) vs antiplatelet or warfarin; 2: unspecified choice). The tools were used either pre-visit (at home or in the waiting room) or during the consultation (n=5). Tools were delivered using a mobile application (n=4), web-based application (n=5), or a desktop (n=2). Of the eleven tools, 2 could automatically calculate individualized stroke risk using data from electronic health records. Most articles reported favourable user feedback regarding use of the digital patient decision-support tools, such as high perceived usefulness, user-friendliness, and overall satisfaction. No significant difference was found in encounter times between intervention and control arms (2 RCTs). Four tools were publicly available and 3 were implemented in healthcare delivery beyond research. Conclusion Despite demonstrated efficacy in reducing decisional conflict and improving patient knowledge, as well as positive clinician and patient experience, only 3 tools were implemented in clinical practice beyond their trial. Future tools could better leverage digital capabilities to integrate with Electronic Health Records, automate stroke and bleeding risk calculations, and personalise content based on patient values and preferences. Additional robust trials and implementation studies are warranted to understand barriers and enablers to the use of these tools.

Prevention of dementia using mobile phone applications (PRODEMOS): a multinational randomised controlled effectiveness-implementation trial

Abstract Background The expected increase of dementia prevalence in the coming decades will mainly be within low-and middle-income countries and those with low socioeconomic status (SES) in high income countries. Forty percent of dementia is associated with modifiable, lifestyle-related cardiovascular risk factors. Mobile health interventions with remote coaching can help reach underserved high-risk populations globally. Methods This open label, blinded endpoint, hybrid effectiveness-implementation randomised controlled trial (RCT) investigated whether a coach-supported mHealth intervention can reduce dementia risk in persons aged 55-75 years of low SES in UK or from the general population in China with at least two dementia risk factors. The primary effectiveness outcome was change in CAIDE dementia risk score (including age, education, sex, systolic blood pressure, total cholesterol, BMI, physical exercise) after 12-18 months of intervention. Main implementation outcomes were coverage, acceptability, appropriateness, adoption, feasibility, sustainability, fidelity, and costs using a mixed methods approach. Findings Between 15th January 2021 and 18th April 2023, 1,488 persons were included and randomised (734 intervention, 754 control), with 1,229 (82·6%) available for analysis of the primary effectiveness outcome. After a mean follow-up of 16 months, the mean CAIDE score improved by 0·16 points in the intervention group vs. 0·01 in the control group (Mean Difference (MD) 0·16, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 0·03-0·29). The effect was larger in those who adhered to the intervention (MD 0·27, 95%CI 0·12-0·44) and those planning to change lifestyle (MD 0·33, 95%CI 0·10-0·57). Ten percent of those invited participated; of these, 81% adopted the intervention and 50% continued active participation throughout the study. For the individual components of the CAIDE score, there were no statistically significant differences for systolic blood pressure, total cholesterol and BMI, but in the intervention group physical inactivity was reduced more than in the control group (MD 6·7%, 95%CI 2·1 to 11·2) and more participants quit smoking (MD -3·1%, 95%CI -4·8 to -1·5). Interpretation A coach-supported mHealth intervention to improve lifestyle is modestly effective in reducing dementia risk factors in those with low SES in the UK and any SES in China. Implementation is challenging in these populations, but those reached actively participated. Whether this will result in less cognitive decline and dementia requires a larger RCT with long follow-up.

Autism Early Intervention - Progress, Steps Backward, and the Reconciliation of Conflicting Narratives.

We review recent research on interventions, services and supports for children on the autism spectrum, examining both advancements and setbacks. Progress has included an increase in quantity and rigor of intervention science, as well as a broadening of disciplines and perspectives engaged in the examination of early interventions, including their effectiveness, social validity and the contextual determinants of implementation outcomes. Setbacks have included the decrease in research involving children on the autism spectrum who have co-occurring profound intellectual disability, minimal or no spoken language, and who require constant assistance with daily living activities. This trend is alarming because it contributes to the marginalization and unmet needs of children who need intervention the most. Additionally, access to early intervention services is unequal and complicated by the misalignment of policy with the evolving evidence base in the field. The recent growth in the depth and breadth of knowledge related to autism early intervention means that policies, practices, advocacy efforts and research directions can be grounded on a more comprehensive evidence base and societal appraisal of autism. Nevertheless, these indisputable markers of success co-exist with conflicting narratives that hinder the establishment of a cohesive agenda to tackle inequities experienced by marginalized subgroups. Reconciliation of conflicting narratives requires a nuanced and compassionate appraisal of sources of tensions and heterogeneity of needs within the autism spectrum.

Exploring Implementation of Reasonable Adjustments in Hospitals for People With Intellectual Disability: Using a Realist Lens.

To explore the factors influencing the implementation of reasonable adjustments in hospitals for people with intellectual disability: using a realist lens. A qualitative study using a realist lens. Data collection involved one focus group interview and three semi-structured interviews with healthcare professionals working in hospital or community settings in September 2023. Data were analysed using qualitative content analysis and findings were mapped to the Context and Implementation of Complex Interventions (CICI) framework across the dimension's context, implementation and setting. Healthcare professionals support the provision of reasonable adjustments in acute hospitals as a person-centred approach to caring for people with intellectual disability. While reasonable adjustments are evident in practice, they are mostly individual-level cases with little evidence of strategic system-level implementation. The factors influencing the implementation of reasonable adjustments in practice were conceptualised using the CICI framework. Context factors spanned the domains of epidemiological (e.g., ageing population), socio-cultural (e.g., historical healthcare), political (e.g., lack of integrated care pathways) and ethical (e.g., provision of person-centred care). Implementation factors spanned the domains of strategies (e.g., leadership strategies), agents (e.g., liaison and advocacy roles) and outcomes (e.g., individual-level reasonable adjustments). The setting for the complex intervention was the acute hospital. System-level indicators for successful implementation include intellectual disability specific policies/procedures for integrated care pathways, education and awareness training for hospital staff, and leadership strategies such as the development of liaison nursing roles and the appropriate allocation of physical and human resources. A radical change is needed where implementation of reasonable adjustments in acute hospitals are broadened beyond isolated individual-level cases to system-level healthcare. This research highlights the importance of exploring the integrated dimensions of context, implementation and setting in complex interventions such as reasonable adjustments and sets foundation for further implementation research in this area. Reasonable adjustments at the system-level within acute hospitals would promote person-centred care and help address the inequities and health disparities experienced by people with intellectual disability. This research uses a realist lens to explore the factors influencing the implementation of reasonable adjustments in acute hospitals for people with intellectual disability. The factors influencing the implementation of reasonable adjustments in practice were conceptualised using the CICI framework across the dimensions of context (domains epidemiological, socio-cultural, political and ethical), implementation (domains strategies, agents and outcomes) and setting. System-level indicators for successful implementation include intellectual disability specific policies/procedures for integrated care pathways, education and awareness training for hospital staff, and leadership strategies such as the development of liaison nursing roles and the appropriate allocation of physical and human resources. This research highlights the importance of exploring the integrated dimensions of context, implementation and setting of complex interventions such as reasonable adjustments and sets a foundation for further implementation research in this area. This research adhered to the Equator research reporting guideline: standards for reporting qualitative research. A parent of a child with intellectual disability was involved in the conduct of this research, specifically in the design, data collection and preparation of the manuscript.

Assessing the implementation of suicide-focused treatments delivered in hybrid telemental health format in a real-world setting

Objective The purpose of this study was to assess the implementation of suicide-focused treatments delivered via a hybrid telemental health (TMH) and in-person format. Method This study was conducted at four university counseling centers (UCCs) across the United States. Treatment-seeking clients were recruited from their local UCCs and participated in adaptive treatment strategies (ATSs) involving Treatment as Usual (TAU), Collaborative Assessment and Management of Suicidality (CAMS), and Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT). Implementation outcomes, including appropriateness, acceptability, feasibility, fidelity, safety, and client satisfaction, were assessed. UCC clinicians participated in qualitative interviews focused on implementation of TMH for clients presenting with suicidal ideation (SI). Results Overall, treatments delivered via hybrid format were reported to be appropriate, acceptable, feasible, and satisfactory by clinicians and clients. Implementation of TMH was reported to be equivalent to in-person treatment across multiple measurement methods. Conclusion Results from this study demonstrate that TMH is an implementable treatment modality for addressing suicidality, particularly for college students presenting to UCCs with SI. This study has implications for real-world clinical settings planning to offer hybrid treatment modalities to address SI. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04728815.

In-person vs mobile app facilitated life skills education to improve the mental health of internally displaced persons in Nigeria: protocol for the RESETTLE-IDPs cluster randomized hybrid type 2 effectiveness-implementation trial

BackgroundInternally displaced persons (IDPs) in Nigeria face a high burden of mental health disorders, with limited access to evidence-based, culturally relevant interventions. Life skills education (LSE) is a promising approach to promote mental health and psychosocial well-being in humanitarian settings. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness and implementation of a culturally adapted LSE program delivered through in-person and mobile platforms among IDPs in Northern Nigeria.MethodsThis cluster-randomized hybrid type 2 effectiveness-implementation trial will be conducted in 20 IDP camps or host communities in Maiduguri, Nigeria. Sites will be randomly assigned to receive a 12-week LSE program delivered either through in-person peer support groups or WhatsApp-facilitated mobile groups. The study will recruit 500 participants aged 13 years and older. Intervention effectiveness outcomes include the primary outcome of change in post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms assessed using the PCL-5 scale, and secondary outcomes of depression, anxiety, well-being, and life skills acquisition. Implementation outcomes will be assessed using the Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM), Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM), and Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM). Both sets of outcomes will be compared between the in-person and mobile delivery groups. Quantitative data will be analyzed using mixed-effects linear regression models, while qualitative data will be examined through reflexive thematic analysis. The study will be guided by the Reach-Effectiveness-Adoption-Implementation-Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework.DiscussionThe RESETTLE-IDPs study addresses key gaps in the evidence base on mental health interventions for conflict-affected populations. It focuses on underserved IDP populations, evaluates the comparative effectiveness of in-person and mobile-delivered LSE, and incorporates implementation science frameworks to assess contextual factors influencing adoption, fidelity, and sustainability. The study employs a community-based participatory approach to enhance cultural relevance, acceptability, and ownership. Findings will inform the development and scale-up of evidence-based, sustainable mental health interventions for IDPs in Nigeria and other humanitarian contexts.Trial sponsorDalhousie University, 6299 South St, Halifax, NS B3H 4R2, Canada.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT06412679 Registered 15 May 2024.

Using Implementation Science to Implement Evidence-Based Practice: A Discursive Paper.

The purpose of this manuscript is to offer an overview of knowledge regarding Evidence-Based Practice and implementation science. It addresses the question: What are the EBP implementation models used in nursing settings? Discursive paper. The databases were searched with the following keywords: 'Nursing Faculty', 'Nurse educator', 'Academic', 'clinic', 'Evidence-based implementation', 'evidence-based practice', 'implementation', 'implementation science', 'undergraduate', 'nurse'. The search strategy aims to identify published studies. Eight databases were searched. There are specific implementation models for implementing EBP: the IOWA Model, the Stetler Model, the Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence-Based Practice Model, the Stevens Star Model, the Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services (PARIHS), the Advancing Research and Clinical practice through close collaboration (ARCC) model. They were analysed according to the Nilsen classification. An evidence-based implementation project must be structured. First, it is necessary to choose an implementation model, then identify one or more implementation strategies, and finally, plan evaluation for implementation outcome. The use of implementation science ensures successful implementation or at least highlights barriers that need adjustment. Effective utilisation of implementation science facilitates the transfer of obtained results to similar contexts. Implementation science complements the EBP process perfectly and ensures the proper implementation of evidence. EBP mentors now have the entire structure of implementation science to succeed in implementing evidence-based data in both academic and clinical settings. The discursive paper addresses the difficulties of implementing evidence in academic or clinical settings. Implementation science is the bridge between evidence and practice. Nurses now have everything they need to implement evidence-based practice successfully. There was no patient or public involvement in the design or writing of this discursive article.

Implementing a group singing intervention for postpartum depression within the Italian health service

BackgroundIn the United Kingdom a singing intervention for Postpartum Depression (PPD) titled “Music and Motherhood” was found to be effective. The World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe coordinated a study to assess the feasibility of implementing and adapting the intervention in other countries. In Italy, recent studies have highlighted the need to promote the availability of effective interventions for PPD in primary care.AimTo describe the implementation of “Music and Motherhood” within the Italian primary care services dedicated to pregnancy and postnatal care in three different geographical locations, thus providing an example of strategies for implementing an arts and health intervention in primary care that can improve health and well-being.MethodsA 10-week group singing intervention for mothers with PPD was conducted as part of a single arm feasibility study. Data were collected through one-to-one interviews, focus groups and questionnaires from the professionals involved in the implementation and selected participating mothers. A conceptual framework including acceptability, appropriateness, feasibility, fidelity, implementation process, costs and sustainability was adopted for analysis. Number of sessions attended by mothers and implementation outcome measures for acceptability, appropriateness and feasibility, each consisting of four items rated on a 5-point Likert scale were also gathered.ResultsThe intervention was found to be inclusive of women from different socio-cultural backgrounds and appropriate to the context. The group setting and the use of an arts-based intervention helped to de-medicalise the process of care maximising resources. Singing helped mothers to express their feelings and find strategies to improve interaction with their child. Attention to mothers’ needs and the co-presence of the professional singing leader and a health professional were among the key factors. The median number of sessions attended was nine out of 10. In terms of acceptability, almost 90% of the professionals were in complete agreement that they liked and approved the intervention.ConclusionOur study adds to the evidence that an arts and health intervention proven effective in one culture and linguistic context can be adapted to another. Collaboration among health professionals and artists in the implementation process and adequate funding are instrumental in moving from project to programme level.

Cluster randomized trial of a team communication training implementation strategy for depression screening in a pediatric healthcare system: a study protocol

BackgroundPediatric depression is a global concern that has fueled efforts for enhanced detection and treatment engagement. As one example, the US Preventive Services Task Force recommends depression screening for adolescents ages 12–18 years. While many health systems have implemented components of depression screening protocols, there is limited evidence of effective follow-up for pediatric depression. A key barrier is timely team communication and coordination across clinicians and staff within and across service areas for prompt service linkage. However, team effectiveness interventions have been shown to improve team processes and outcomes and can be applied in healthcare settings.MethodsThis project aims to refine and test a team communication training implementation strategy to improve implementation of an existing pediatric depression screening protocol in a large pediatric healthcare system. The team will be defined as part of the study but is expected to include medical assistants, nurses, physicians, and behavioral health clinicians within and across departments. The implementation strategy will target team mechanisms at the team-level (i.e., intra-organizational alignment and implementation climate) and team member-level (i.e., communication, coordination, psychological safety, and shared cognition). First, the project will use mixed methods to refine the team training strategy to fit the organizational context and workflows. Next, a hybrid type 3 implementation-effectiveness pilot trial will assess the initial effectiveness of the team communication training (implementation strategy) paired with the current universal depression screening protocol (clinical intervention) on implementation outcomes (i.e., feasibility, acceptability, appropriateness, workflow efficiency) and clinical/services outcomes (increased frequency of needed screening and reduced time to service linkage). Finally, the study will assess mechanisms at the team and team member levels that may affect implementation outcomes.DiscussionTeam communication training is hypothesized to lead to improved, efficient, and effective decision-making to increase the compliance with depression screening and timely service linkage. Findings are expected to yield better understanding and examples of how to optimize team communication to improve efficiency and effectiveness in the pediatric depression screening-to-treatment cascade. This should also culminate in improved implementation outcomes including patient engagement critical to address the youth mental health crisis.Trial registrationNCT06527196.Trial Sponsor: University of California San Diego.

A study of implementation factors for a novel approach to clinical trials: constructs for consideration in the coordination of direct-to-patient online-based medical research

BackgroundTraditional medical research infrastructures relying on the Centers of Excellence (CoE) model (an infrastructure or shared facility providing high standards of research excellence and resources to advance scientific knowledge) are often limited by geographic reach regarding patient accessibility, presenting challenges for study recruitment and accrual. Thus, the development of novel, patient-centered (PC) strategies (e.g., the use of online technologies) to support recruitment and streamline study procedures are necessary. This research focused on an implementation evaluation of a design innovation with implementation outcomes as communicated by study staff and patients for CoE and PC approaches for a randomized controlled trial (RCT) for patients with vasculitis.MethodsIn-depth qualitative interviews were conducted with 32 individuals (17 study team members, 15 patients). Transcripts were coded using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR).ResultsThe following CFIR elements emerged: characteristics of the intervention, inner setting, characteristics of individuals, and process. From the staff perspective, the communication of the PC approach was a major challenge, but should have been used as an opportunity to identify one “point person” in charge of all communicative elements among the study team. Study staff from both arms were highly supportive of the PC approach and saw its promise, particularly regarding online consent procedures. Patients reported high self-efficacy in reference to the PC approach and utilization of online technologies. Local physicians were integral for making patients feel comfortable about participation in research studies.ConclusionsThe complexity of replicating the interpersonal nature of the CoE model in the virtual setting is substantial, meaning the PC approach should be viewed as a hybrid strategy that integrates online and face-to-face practices.Trial registrations1) Name: The Assessment of Prednisone In Remission Trial – Centers of Excellence Approach (TAPIR).Trial registration number: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01940094.Date of registration: September 10, 2013.2) Name: The Assessment of Prednisone In Remission Trial – Patient Centric Approach (TAPIR).Trial registration number: Clinical Trials.gov NCT01933724.Date of registration: September 2, 2013.

Clinic personnel attitudes and baseline implementation outcomes of a lupus decision aid

ABSTRACT To examine the association between clinical personnel’s general attitudes towards new interventions and implementation outcomes related to an evidence-based individualized, culturally tailored, computerized decision aid (DA) for the management of lupus. To assess attitudes, the validated Evidence-Based Practice Attitudes Scale (EBPAS) survey was emailed to personnel in 15 rheumatology clinics across the U.S. The survey also included questions related to three validated implementation outcomes: lupus DA acceptability, appropriateness and feasibility. The baseline round of the survey was fielded from August 2019 to January 2020 and yielded a 56.8% response rate (n = 76 respondents). We also collected organizational characteristics from each clinic and personnel-level control variables. Overall, respondents reported modest levels of lupus DA acceptability, appropriateness and feasibility (3.54, 3.45 and 3.40, respectively, on a scale of 1–5). Multilevel regression analyses demonstrated statistically significant positive relationships between a respondent’s openness to new practices/interventions and perceived lupus DA acceptability (β = 0.31, p < .01) and feasibility (β = 0.28, p < .05). Divergence (a respondent’s perceived difference between current and new practices) was not associated with clinic personnel perceptions of the DA. These findings suggest that understanding clinic personnel general attitudes toward new interventions is an important precursor to implementing evidence-based practices and may provide important diagnostic information about places to intervene in preparation for implementation and improving shared decision-making with patients.

ANALYSIS OF THE INTEGRATION OF TECHNOLOGICAL INNOVATIONS IN THE MOTIVATION STRATEGIES OF THE ENTERPRISE

This article investigates the impact of contemporary technological innovations on corporate motivational strategies, focusing on the integration of digital tools, analytical systems, and mobile applications into employee motivation processes. The relevance of the topic is underscored by the rapid technological advancements that are transforming management practices and employee needs, as well as enhancing business competitiveness. The works of Ukrainian scientists and economists have been analyzed regarding various aspects of the impact of modern technologies on employee motivation, approaches to their implementation, and the practical results they provide for enterprises. The paper examines how technological innovations—particularly digital feedback platforms, analytical systems, mobile applications, and gamification—affect motivational strategies by enabling more personalized and effective motivation management. It explores how these tools contribute to increased employee productivity, reduced turnover, and improved organizational culture. Existing approaches and outcomes of new technology implementations are evaluated, highlighting the need for further research to develop adaptive and dynamic motivational systems. The article offers recommendations for optimizing employee motivation processes through modern digital tools and approaches. The findings are valuable for practitioners and researchers involved in human resource management and technological innovations in business. Attention is drawn to further research on the impact of technological innovations on employee turnover management and the adaptation of new hires. It is determined that assessing the effectiveness of new approaches to employee integration and motivational support during the first months of employment can help develop strategies that reduce turnover rates and increase the engagement of new employees. It is substantiated that the prospects for further research in this field focus on expanding the understanding of how technologies can not only support but also transform motivational strategies, providing businesses with new opportunities to achieve their goals and enhance competitiveness.

Impacts of a sustainable aviation fuel mandate on airline competition — Full-service carrier vs. low-cost carrier

The aviation industry has proposed the collective goal of achieving net-zero carbon emissions by 2050. In addition to the existing market-based methods (MBMs), the use of renewable energies, in particular, sustainable aviation fuel (SAF), could be one of the most promising means for achieving this long-term target. This paper investigates how an SAF mandate from the government can lead to heterogeneous impacts on two types of airlines, namely, full-service carriers (FSCs) and low-cost carriers (LCCs), that compete in the same markets. A game-theoretic economic model is constructed that accounts for the different service quality levels and cost structures (i.e., fuel efficiency) between FSCs and LCCs. Our analytical results suggest that the SAF mandate favors LCCs over FSCs. The share of SAF blended into fuel raises the airfares of both types of airlines while reducing the traffic and profit of FSCs. The impacts on the LCC traffic and profit depend on its fuel efficiency relative to that of FSC. When LCCs are sufficiently fuel efficient, the SAF mandate can increase their traffic and profit. The government subsidy on airline's SAF use is also analyzed, deriving the optimal subsidy levels for FSC and LCC respectively to achieve pareto-improvement in social welfare and consumer surplus. We also examine how air passengers’ environmental awareness affects the outcomes of SAF mandate implementation. Our economic model also accounts for passengers’ heterogeneous preferences in terms of service quality and price sensitivity.

Integrating hypertension detection and management in HIV care in South Africa: protocol for a stepped-wedged cluster randomized effectiveness-implementation hybrid trial

BackgroundHIV clinical guidelines recommend hypertension detection and management to lower cardiovascular disease risk, but these have not been effectively implemented for people living with HIV (PWH). Addressing this implementation gap requires community-engaged implementation studies focused on addressing implementation barriers specific to the HIV care context.MethodsThis protocol describes a type 2 effectiveness-implementation hybrid study conducted in nine primary care clinics in Johannesburg. The study will evaluate the effect of implementation strategies on guideline-recommended blood pressure assessment and management in HIV clinics and the effects of assessment/management on patient blood pressure. A stepped-wedge, cluster randomized study design was used to randomize clinics to the time at which they receive the implementation strategies and patient intervention. The implementation strategies tested include identifying and preparing care champions, changing record systems, conducting ongoing training, providing audit and feedback, and changing the physical structure/equipment. The patient intervention tested includes detection of elevated blood pressure, educational materials, lifestyle modification advice, and medication where needed. Implementation outcomes include adoption, fidelity (co-primary outcome), cost, and maintenance of the blood pressure assessment protocol in participating clinics, while patient outcomes include reach, effectiveness (co-primary outcome), and long-term effects of the intervention on patient blood pressure. These will be assessed via direct observation, study records, staff logs, medical chart reviews, and patient and healthcare worker surveys. To examine effects on the implementation (intervention fidelity) and effectiveness (patient blood pressure changes) co-primary outcomes, we will use the standard Hussey and Hughes model for analysis of stepped-wedge designs which includes fixed effects for both interventions and time periods, and a random effect for sites. Finally, we will examine the costs for the implementation strategies, healthcare worker time, and patient-facing intervention materials, as well as the cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of the intervention using study records, patient surveys, and a time and motion assessment.DiscussionThis study will address knowledge gaps around implementation of cardiovascular disease preventive practices in HIV care in South Africa. In doing so, it will provide a dual opportunity to promote evidence-based care in the South African HIV care context and help refine implementation research methods to better serve HIV populations globally.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05846503. Registered on May 6, 2023. https://classic.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05846503.

Health dialogue intervention versus opportunistic screening in primary care for type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease prevention in settings with low socioeconomic status (DETECT): study protocol for a pragmatic cluster-randomized trial

BackgroundMeta-analyses of randomized trials suggest that health checks and health promotion interventions targeting behavior change in primary care do not prevent cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in the general population. However, whether such interventions are more effective in high-risk populations, such as people living in low socioeconomic settings, remains unclear, as they have been poorly represented in previous trials. Therefore, we aim to evaluate the effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, and implementation of systematic screening followed by an individually oriented, lifestyle-focused, health dialogue intervention for prevention of type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease, as compared to opportunistic screening, in primary care in socioeconomically disadvantaged areas.MethodsUsing an overall pragmatic approach and a cluster-randomized design with two arms, we aim to enroll 3000 participants aged 50–59 years from 30 primary care centers (PCCs) with an above-average level of Care Need Index in Stockholm Region, Sweden. PCCs will be randomized (1:1) either to a health dialogue intervention, which includes inviting enlisted patients to a systematic screening of risk factors followed by an individually oriented lifestyle-focused health dialogue, or to opportunistic screening, which includes screening patients for a smaller set of risk factors during an appointment at their PCC taking place for other reasons. The main outcome will be change in systolic blood pressure during 6- and 12-month follow-ups. Additional short-term outcomes will be changes in other biological risk factors, health-related quality-of-life, and lifestyle habits, as well as process and implementation outcomes, and unintended side effects. The long-term effect on type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease incidence and mortality will be examined using regional and nationwide registers. Changes in systolic blood pressure and other health outcomes will be analyzed using mixed-effect generalized linear modeling and mixed-effect Cox regression to capture variability between and within PCCs. A health economic evaluation will assess resource use and costs in the short- and long-term.DiscussionThis trial of lifestyle-focused health dialogues and opportunistic screening in primary care in socioeconomically disadvantaged areas in the largest region of Sweden has the potential to yield valuable insights that could support evidence-based policymaking.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06067178). Prospectively registered September 27, 2023.

A complex ePrescribing antimicrobial stewardship-based (ePAMS+) intervention for hospitals: mixed-methods feasibility trial results

BackgroundAntibiotic resistant infections cause over 700,000 deaths worldwide annually. As antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) helps minimise the emergence of antibiotic resistance resulting from inappropriate use of antibiotics in healthcare, we developed ePAMS+ (ePrescribing-based Anti-Microbial Stewardship), an ePrescribing and Medicines Administration (EPMA) system decision-support tool complemented by educational, behavioural and organisational elements.MethodsWe conducted a non-randomised before-and-after feasibility trial, implementing ePAMS+ in two English hospitals using the Cerner Millennium EPMA system. Wards of several specialties were included. Patient participants were blinded to whether ePAMS+ was in use; prescribers were not. A mixed-methods evaluation aimed to establish: acceptability and usability of ePAMS+ and trial processes; feasibility of ePAMS+ implementation and quantitative outcome recording; and a Fidelity Index measuring the extent to which ePAMS+ was delivered as intended. Longitudinal semi-structured interviews of doctors, nurses and pharmacists, alongside non-participant observations, gathered qualitative data; we extracted quantitative prescribing data from the EPMA system. Normal linear modelling of the defined daily dose (DDD) of antibiotic per admission quantified its variability, to inform sample size calculations for a future trial of ePAMS+ effectiveness.ResultsThe research took place during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, from April 2021 to November 2022. 60 qualitative interviews were conducted (33 before ePAMS+ implementation, 27 after). 1,958 admissions (1,358 before ePAMS+ implementation; 600 after) included 24,884 antibiotic orders.Qualitative interviews confirmed that some aspects of ePAMS+ , its implementation and training were acceptable, while other features (e.g. enabling combinations of antibiotics to be prescribed) required further development. ePAMS+ uptake was low (28 antibiotic review records from 600 admissions; 0.047 records per admission), preventing full development of a Fidelity Index. Normal linear modelling of antibiotic DDD per admission showed a residual variance of 1.086 (log-transformed scale). Unavailability of indication data prevented measurement of some outcomes (e.g. number of antibiotic courses per indication).ConclusionsThis feasibility trial encountered unforeseen circumstances due to contextual factors and a global pandemic, highlighting the need for careful adaptation of complex intervention implementations to the local setting. We identified key refinements to ePAMS+ to support its wider adoption in clinical practice, requiring further piloting before a confirmatory effectiveness trial.Trial registrationISRCTN Registry ISRCTN13429325, 24 March 2022.