Implementation Of Risk Minimization Measures Research Articles

Assessment of the implementation of risk minimization measures for bosentan: a retrospective study

ABSTRACT Background Bosentan is associated with adverse hepatic effects. To minimize such risk, regulators implemented risk minimization measures (RMMs), including testing for liver injury biomarkers (alanine and aspartate transaminase and bilirubin) prior to therapy initiation and monthly throughout therapy. This study aimed to examine the adherence to hepatic monitoring requirements. Research design and methods This retrospective cohort study collected data about bosentan new-users from the Real-world Evidence Research Network from 2016 to 2022. We ascertained hepatic tests from laboratory files. Adherence to RMM definition was performing the required tests within 90 days before initiation and categorized adherence to monthly testing requirement based on the expected number of tests throughout therapy as low (<50%), moderate (50–74%), and high (≥75%). Results One hundred patients entered the study cohort and 71% were females, with a median age of 25 years. Adherence to testing prior to bosentan initiation was 60%. Adherence to monthly testing was low in the majority of patients (58.2%). Conclusions Adherence to bosentan RMMs relevant to minimizing risk of hepatotoxicity either before starting or throughout therapy was low. Our findings could be used as a baseline for monitoring trends in implementation of RMMs over time or to compare performance of various minimization strategies.

Review of Studies Evaluating Effectiveness of Risk Minimization Measures Assessed by the European Medicines Agency Between 2016 and 2021.

The European Medicines Agency (EMA) supervises medicines' safe and effective use throughout the product's life cycle by, for example, monitoring the implementation of risk minimization measures (RMMs). Limited information is available on factors associated with effectiveness of RMMs. This study reviews post-authorization safety studies (PASS) evaluating the effectiveness of RMMs assessed by the Pharmacovigilance Risk Assessment Committee (PRAC) between 2016 and 2021. PASS assessment reports finalized by PRAC between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2021, were compiled from non-public EMA databases and PASS characteristics were extracted. Of the 93 PASS included, 62.4% aimed to measure healthcare professionals' awareness, knowledge, and behavior regarding RMMs. There were 67.7% of the 93 PASS that used primary data, 24.7% used secondary data sources, and 7.5% used both. A cross-sectional study design was most frequently applied (77.4%), followed by a cohort study design (29.0%). Nearly 40% of the included PASS did not render a conclusion on RMM effectiveness. Of the 60% that did render a conclusion, 82.1% were deemed effective. Only minor differences in characteristics were found when stratified by outcome (i.e., effective RMM, ineffective RMM, and no conclusion on RMM effectiveness). To conclude, 4 out of 10 PASS assessing impact of RMMs did not render a conclusion on RMM effectiveness. No clear differences in PASS characteristics were found in relation to their outcomes, indicating that additional research is needed to understand better the underlying reasons for PASS being inconclusive.

Implementation of risk minimization measures to reduce the risk of tuberculosis among tumor necrosis factor medication users.

To examine the adherence to risk minimization measures (RMMs) in newly treated patients with anti-tumor necrosis factor-alpha (anti-TNF-α) medications at one of the largest tertiary care hospitals in Saudi Arabia. We included patients who had at least one prescription of infliximab or adalimumab. The index date was the first recorded date of infliximab or adalimumab prescription. New users of anti-TNF-α were divided into pre- and post-RMM implementation groups. The outcome of interest was the proportion of patients that received tuberculosis (TB) screening, including a chest X-ray (CXR) or a QuantiFERON test within 1 month prior to the index date. A pre-post RMM implementation comparison of TB screening among infliximab users showed a significant increase in the rates of CXR tests (from 7.5% before RMM implementation to 13.8% after RMM implementation, p < 0.001) and the rates of QuantiFERON tests (4.5% before RMM implementation to 24.1% after RMM implementation, p < 0.001). RMMs were introduced to the study site at the same time as adalimumab was approved and the proportion of patients receiving TB screening was 25.2%. TB screening prior to initiation of infliximab or adalimumab was not optimal. However, we noted an improvement in TB screening after the implementation of RMMs for infliximab. Future research may address reasons for low adherence to testing requirements for TB prior to initiation of anti-TNF-α medications.

A drug utilization study of thiocolchicoside-containing medicinal products for systemic use in France and Italy: A cross-sectional electronic medical records database study.

The risk minimization measures (RMM) for systemic use of thiocolchicoside (TCC) was implemented across Europe during 2014-2016. RMM included restriction of use in age <16 years, maximum dose and duration, chronic conditions, contraindication in pregnancy, lactation or in women of childbearing potential [WOCBP] without appropriate contraception. The current Drug Utilization Study was aimed to describe the prescribing practices of TCC in France and Italy. The study analyzed data (demographic, prescription, diagnosis, and concomitant treatment) from electronic medical record databases. It compares drug utilization during pre-implementation (baseline: year 2013) and post-implementation (years 1, 2, and 3) of RMM. This study included panels of general practitioners (FGP) and rheumatologists (FRH) in France and Italy (IGP). TCC was largely prescribed as adjuvant therapy in both pre-implementation (FGP: 93.5%, FRH: 88.8%, IGP: 86.6%) and post-implementation (FGP: 92.3%, FRH: 89.5%, IGP: 89.0%) periods. Prescribing patterns were different in France and Italy, with FGP and FRH mainly prescribing oral formulation (>95% and >80%, respectively), while IGP prescribing intramuscular formulation (>70%). Prescriptions to patients aged ≥16 years were >99% in all panels during both periods. An improvement was observed in compliance with treatment duration for oral formulation in the FGP panel post-implementation versus pre-implementation (66.2% vs. 46.7%; p < 0.001). There was no change in prescription rate post RMM implementation in pregnant (FGP: 0.5%, IGP: 4.7%) and in WOCBP without appropriate contraception (FGP: 89.3%, IGP: 93.4%). These results highlighted changes in prescribing practices of TCC after RMM implementation, which varied across panels and measures.

Risk management strategies and implementation of risk minimization measures for medicinal products

Risk management strategies and implementation of risk minimization measures for medicinal products

Analysis of Transfusion-Transmitted Bacterial Infections according to German Hemovigilance Data (2011–2020)

Introduction: Following the first assessment of the effects of safety measures taken against transfusion-transmitted bacterial infections (TTBI), the Paul-Ehrlich-Institut (PEI) decided to newly analyze risk minimization measures (RMM) using German hemovigilance data from 2011 to 2020, focusing on blood components, recipients, and bacterial strains. Materials and Methods: The PEI assessed the imputability of all reported serious adverse reactions (SAR) relying mainly on microbiological test results. Reporting rates (RR) of suspected, confirmed, and fatal confirmed TTBI were calculated and compared to the previous reporting 10-year period (2001–2010) using Poisson regression to estimate RR ratios (RRR). Furthermore, details on blood component age, patients’ medical history, and bacterial pathogenicity were collected. Results: With respect to the previous 10-year period, the number of suspected TTBI increased (n = 403), while fewer cases were confirmed (n = 40); the number of deaths remained more or less unchanged (n = 8). The RR for suspected TTBI were 7.9, 18.7, and 1.6 cases per million units transfused for red blood cells (RBC), platelet concentrates (PC), and fresh frozen plasma (FFP), respectively. RRR showed a statistically significant 2.5-fold increase in the RR for suspected TTBI after RBC administration from 2001–2010 to the period under review (p < 0.0001). The RR for confirmed TTBI were 0.4, 5.0, and 0.0 cases per million units transfused for RBC, PC, and FFP, respectively. Compared to the period 2001–2010, there was a statistically significant decrease in the RR of confirmed TTBI by half for PC (p = 0.0052). The RR for confirmed PC-caused TTBI with fatal outcome was 1.4 cases per million units transfused. Regardless of type of blood product transfused and outcome of SAR, the majority of TTBI occurred after administration of a product at the end of shelf life (40.0%) and to recipients of advanced age (median age: 68.5 years) and/or with severe immunosuppression (72.5%) due to decreased myelopoiesis (62.5%). 72.5% of the involved bacteria had a middle/high human pathogenicity. Conclusion: Despite a significant decrease in confirmed TTBI following PC transfusion in Germany after implementation of RMM, the current manufacture of blood products can still not prevent TTBI with fatal outcomes. As demonstrated in various countries, RMM like bacterial screening or pathogen reduction may measurably improve the safety of blood transfusion.

Effectiveness of risk minimization measures for valproate: a drug utilization study based on implementation of a risk minimization programme in Europe, analysis of data from the UK

Objective Since 2014, valproate has not been recommended for use in girls and women of childbearing potential unless other treatments are ineffective or not tolerated. Risk minimization measures (RMMs) of valproate were implemented to reduce the potential risks of developmental disorders among pregnant women. A drug utilization study was carried out to assess the effectiveness of RMMs. Methods This was a multinational, non-interventional cohort study. For the UK, existing data from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink database were used. The primary study endpoint was a change in the proportion of valproate initiations preceded by other medications relevant for valproate indications before and after implementation of RMMs. Results The proportion of valproate initiations preceded by medications related to valproate indications increased after RMM implementation in incident female users in the UK from 66.4% to 72.4%. The proportion of incident prescriptions for epilepsy and bipolar disorder with prior medication related to valproate indications increased, from 36.2% to 44.1% and 72.9% to 77.8%, respectively. The incidence rate of valproate-exposed pregnancies decreased from 16.9 to 10.9 per 1000 person-years in the pre- and post-implementation periods, respectively. Conclusions Results from this study indicated some improvement in physician prescribing and a potential reduction in valproate-exposed pregnancies in the UK. Given only modest improvement has been achieved, additional RMMs were implemented in 2018.

The implementation of risk minimization measures to prevent teratogenic pregnancy outcomes related to oral retinoid and valproate use in Belgium

ABSTRACT Introduction Both oral retinoid and valproate containing medicines are highly teratogenic. Their use by women of childbearing age is controlled by risk minimization measures (RMMs) introduced by the European Medicine Agency, including the pregnancy prevention programme (PPP). In 2018, the RMMs were revised as previous measures were insufficient to prevent the use of these medicines during pregnancies. Aim & Methods A cross-sectional survey was conducted among patients, physicians and pharmacists to evaluate the implementation of the revised RMMs in Belgium. The primary outcome was compliance with key aspects of the PPP. Differences in compliance between oral retinoid and valproate stakeholders were investigated. The relationship between potential determinants (population characteristics and RMM usage) and compliance was studied via multiple logistic regression. Results A total of 317 eligible patients, physicians and pharmacists participated. The majority of the studied patients fail to comply with the PPP, mainly driven by poor implementation of pregnancy testing. A large number of healthcare providers is unaware of the available educational materials. Conclusion It is likely that a substantial part of Belgian women of childbearing age using oral retinoids or valproate insufficiently meet the PPP requirements. We propose to better inform healthcare providers about the mandatory PPPs and available educational materials as well as to support them with the implementation of such programmes to improve the safe use of these teratogenic medicines.

Aspects of the industrial manufacture of concentrates for haemodialysis

The import dependence of the pharmaceutical market of Ukraine on concentrates for hemodialysis determines the relevance of their manufacture. Elaboration of the transfer of drug development to industrial manufacture and, accordingly, the development of industrial technology of liquid acid concentrates for hemodialysis involves scaling the process, organization of production control, establishing critical points of the production and determining cleanliness classes for concentrates and risks, including ecological ones.&#x0D; The aim of the work is to develop approaches to the development of technology for industrial manufacture of acid concentrates for hemodialysis, identification of risks in the technological process and quality control, as well as analysis of major ecological risks and development of methods for their reduction.&#x0D; The object of the study was the regulatory and technical documentation regarding the requirements for hemodialysis concentrates, characterization of the hazard profile of acid concentrates as a source of pharmaceutical wastes and generalization of the information about them in the manufacture of acid concentrates. We used the results of our own experimental research on the development of concentrates. The system-survey method of research and content analysis were used in the analysis.&#x0D; On the basis of researches, it was to work up the approaches to the development of technology of industrial manufacture of acid concentrates. Requirements of various normative and technical documents for water for the manufacture were generalized, classes of cleanliness of industrial premises for the preparation of containers, preparation, filtering, and packing of solutions are offered. The scheme of pharmaceutical wastes of acid concentrates, which are formed during pharmaceutical development, industrial manufacture, and medical administration, is presented. The profile of their unsafety is given. Potential and real ecological risks in the manufacture of acid concentrates for hemodialysis and ways to minimize them are presented. The proposed stages of risk management for pharmaceutical waste during the manufacture of acid concentrates of hemodialysis include: determining the hazard profile of acid concentrates for the environment; identification of risks, as well as replenishment of knowledge about the hazard profile; planning and implementation of risk minimization measures as well as evaluation of the effectiveness of these risk reduction measures. Methods for eliminating the safety of pharmaceutical wastes of acid hemodialysis concentrates (dilution with water or electrolysis to obtain by-products) have been developed.

Medication safety: Evaluating and enhancing implementation of risk minimisation measures in Malaysia.

Medication safety: Evaluating and enhancing implementation of risk minimisation measures in Malaysia.

Effectiveness of risk minimisation measures for valproate: a drug utilisation study in Europe, analysis of data from Spain.

Risk minimisation measures for valproate were implemented in Spain in 2015. The objective of this study is to assess the effectiveness of valproate risk minimisation measures in Spain intended to decrease the use of valproate as a first-line therapy, and to evaluate the prescribing patterns of valproate in women, including women of childbearing potential, in the pre- and post-implementation risk minimisation measures periods. The prescribing patterns of valproate in females and women of childbearing potential before and after risk minimisation measures implementation were examined using the longitudinal patient data database, which includes patient information from two panels: primary care physicians and neurologists/psychiatrists. Primary endpoint was the proportion of initial valproate prescriptions with at least one medication related to the valproate indications before the valproate initiation date. The proportion of incident valproate prescriptions with previous use of medication related to valproate indications was 78.0% (95% CI, 73.9%; 81.5%), and 78.2% (74.5%; 81.4%) in the main pre-and post-implementation periods in the primary care physician panel. The corresponding figures for women of childbearing potential were 79.6% (73.6%; 84.5%) and 75.5% (69.7%; 80.6%), respectively. The incidence rate of pregnancies exposed to valproate (per 1,000 person-years) in women of childbearing potential decreased from 17.4 the entire pre-implementation to 8.5 in the entire post-implementation periods. After the implementation of risk minimisation measures for valproate in Spain, no meaningful change in prescribing was observed regarding the proportion of valproate initiations preceded by prior medication related to valproate indications. The preventative measures recommended for use of valproate in women of childbearing potential should be considered.

Effectiveness of risk minimisation measures for valproate: A drug utilisation study in Europe.

PurposeThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of the risk minimisation measures (RMMs) implemented in Europe in 2014 for valproate‐containing products to mitigate their risk during pregnancy and to characterise valproate prescribing patterns in women of childbearing potential (WCBP) before and after implementation of RMMs.MethodsA multinational cohort study based on existing data sources using a pre‐/post‐ design was performed in five European countries (France, Germany, Spain, Sweden, UK) in an outpatient setting. Effectiveness of RMMs was assessed by comparing the proportion of valproate initiations as second (or subsequent) line therapy before and after implementation of RMMs (primary outcome) with an increase in this proportion indicating success of RMMs. Overall use of valproate and incidence of pregnancies in WCBP were also examined.ResultsThe proportion of valproate initiations as second line therapy increased after implementation of RMMs in incident female users in Sweden (from 81.1%, 95% CI 79.9%‐82.3% to 84.5%, 95% CI 83.5%‐85.5%) and the UK (from 66.4%, 95% CI 64.5%‐68.3% to 72.4%, 95% CI 70.0%‐74.9%), it remained the same in Germany and Spain and decreased in France from 48.7% (95% CI 45.6%‐51.9%) to 40.6% (95% CI 37.6%‐43.7%). In Sweden and the UK, the incidence of pregnancies exposed to valproate decreased in the post‐implementation period: 8.0 vs 9.5 and 10.9 vs 16.9 per 1000 person‐years, respectively.ConclusionThe results on primary outcome of this study suggest limited effectiveness of the RMMs. Additional RMMs were implemented in 2018.

Allopurinol-induced severe cutaneous adverse drug reactions: Risk minimization measures in Malaysia.

To describe risk minimization measures (RMMs) implemented in Malaysia for allopurinol-induced severe cutaneous adverse drug reactions (SCARs) and examine their impact using real-world data on allopurinol usage and adverse drug reaction (ADR) reports associated with allopurinol. Data on allopurinol ADR reports (2000-2018) were extracted from the Malaysian ADR database. We identified RMMs implemented between 2000 and 2018 from the minutes of relevant meetings and the national pharmacovigilance newsletter. We obtained allopurinol utilization data (2004-2018) from the Pharmaceutical Services Programme. To determine the impact of RMMs on ADR reporting, we considered ADR reports received within 1 year of RMM implementation. We used the Pearson χ2 test to examine the relation between the implementation of RMMs and allopurinol ADR reports. The 16 RMMs for allopurinol-related SCARs implemented in Malaysia involved nine risk communications, four prescriber or patient educational material, and three health system innovations. Allopurinol utilization decreased by 21.5% from 2004 to 2018. ADR reporting rates for all drugs (n = 144 507) and allopurinol (n = 1747) increased. ADR reports involving off-label use decreased by 6% from 2011. SCARs cases remained between 20% and 50%. RMMs implemented showed statistically significant reduction in ADR reports involving off-label use for August 2014 [χ2(1, N = 258) = 5.32, P = .021] and October 2016 [χ2(1, N = 349) = 3.85, P = .0499]. RMMs to promote the appropriate use of allopurinol and prescriber education have a positive impact. We need further measures to reduce the incidence and severity of allopurinol-induced SCARs, such as patient education and more research into pharmacogenetic screening.

Reported Severe Hypersensitivity Reactions after Intravenous Iron Administration in the European Economic Area (EEA) Before and After Implementation of Risk Minimization Measures.

IntroductionSevere hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs) such as anaphylaxis are of great clinical concern because of their life-threatening potential. The adverse events attributable to intravenous iron products include HSRs. An investigation by the European Medicines Agency presented in late 2013 resulted in the implementation of risk minimization measures (RMMs).ObjectiveThis study evaluated the number of severe HSRs reported for intravenous iron substances related to exposure for the 4-year periods before and after this implementation.MethodsThis was a retrospective pharmacoepidemiologic study with a case-population design. We obtained information from the safety surveillance database EudraVigilance on spontaneously reported severe HSRs using the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities preferred terms “anaphylactic reaction/shock” and “anaphylactoid reaction/shock”. Exposure was estimated using IQVIA MIDAS sales data in European economic area countries.ResultsReporting rates for individual products were heterogenous, and the implementation of RMMs appeared to have no clear impact. Reporting rates remained low for the full study period for iron sucrose (0.03–0.20) and ferric gluconate (0.02–0.14) and were higher at the beginning and lower at the end of the study period for ferric carboxymaltose (1.47–0.18). No clear trend was detected for iron dextran (range 0.22–2.80) and iron (III) isomaltoside 1000 (range 0–7.94).ConclusionsFuture research is needed to investigate whether the wide variability in reporting rates for severe HSRs associated with these intravenous iron products are due to potential differences in the safety profiles of these substances.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (10.1007/s40264-019-00868-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Drug utilization patterns of flupirtine following implementation of risk minimization measures in Germany

Objectives: This report characterizes flupirtine prescribing patterns before and after the implementation of risk minimization measures (RMM) in Germany as a complementary analysis to support previous study findings.Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted using a patient-level longitudinal prescription database (IMS LRx) in Germany. The study population included patients who were prescribed flupirtine-containing products. One-year periods before (2012) and after (April 2015–March 2016) RMM implementation were assessed for the following measures: flupirtine use of up to two weeks, flupirtine use when other analgesics are contraindicated and concomitant use of drugs with a known potential to induce liver injury.Results: The number of flupirtine users decreased by 41.0% from 248,738 patients in the pre-RMM implementation period to 146,764 in the post-implementation period. The proportion of patients prescribed flupirtine for up to 14 days increased significantly by 22.7%, from 67.9% to 90.6% in the pre- to post-implementation periods, respectively. Over half the patients received long-term medications for conditions contraindicated with the use of other analgesics within 12 months prior to the first flupirtine prescription in the pre- and post-implementation periods (57.1% and 52.3%, respectively). Concomitant prescriptions of drugs with known potential hepatotoxic effects were recorded in 36.6% and 34.2% of flupirtine prescriptions during the pre- and post-implementation periods, respectively.Conclusions: While physicians generally restricted flupirtine prescriptions to the short-term treatment duration recommended in the labeling, the other labeling recommendations were not as stringently adopted. Findings of this investigation support a previous study conducted in an electronic medical record database.

A drug utilization study to evaluate effectiveness of risk minimization measures for trimetazidine in France, Hungary, Romania and Spain.

The approved indication for trimetazidine (TMZ) was restricted to "add-on therapy for the symptomatic treatment of patients with stable angina pectoris who are inadequately controlled by or intolerant to first-line antianginal therapies" in 2012 by the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP). TMZ was no longer indicated for ophthalmology and otolaryngology (ENT) indications. This drug utilization study analysed actual utilization of TMZ before and after the restriction on its indications to evaluate the effectiveness of risk minimization measures (RMM). This was a multi-national, cross-sectional, non-interventional drug utilization study using European databases: IMS Prescribing Insights (PI) for France and Spain, National Diagnostic Index (NDI) for Romania and National Prescription Audit (NPA) for Hungary. TMZ prescriptions issued by Ear-Nose-Throat (ENT) specialists, ophthalmologists, cardiologists and General Physicians (GPs)/others were analysed during the 24-month period before (reference period) and after RMM implementation (assessment period). During the assessment period, most of the TMZ prescriptions for ENT and ophthalmology indications (un-authorized indications) were made by GPs/others followed by ENT specialists, ophthalmologists and cardiologists in most of the countries. The proportion of TMZ prescriptions for ENT or ophthalmological indications after the restrictions on indication was reduced in Hungary (by 0.4%) and Spain (by 11.8%), remained the same in Romania and increased in France (by 3.7%). This study showed that a significant proportion of TMZ prescriptions was off-label for ENT or ophthalmological indications following the RMM implementation. More effective RMM strategies are required to reduce off-label prescriptions of TMZ.

Study design, process and outcome indicators of post‐authorization studies aimed at evaluating the effectiveness of risk minimization measures in the EU PAS Register

Risk minimization measures (RMMs) represent an essential tool for preventing the occurrence of safety-related outcomes. The evaluation of RMMs effectiveness is essential to prove their success and ensure protection of public health. The aim of this qualitative review was to assess the design, process and outcome indicators used for attesting successful implementation of RMMs. We searched the EU Post-Authorization Studies Register up to 30 June 2018 for studies having the scope defined as 'effectiveness evaluation'. Study titles and objectives were screened to select the ones evaluating the effectiveness of RMMs. We described and assessed the extent to which these studies aligned with Good Pharmacovigilance Practices guidelines recommendations. Out of 360 registered studies, we identified 35 studies on evaluation of RMMs effectiveness, 29 being eligible for review. Twenty-six studies evaluated additional RMMs, employed in case routine interventions are considered insufficient. All studies assessed process indicators, five also assessing outcome indicators, thus using a dual-evidence approach as recommended by the guidelines. However, none of the latter used a pre-post design, comparing the frequency of the adverse outcome before and after the implementation of RMMs. Behaviour and knowledge were the most often assessed process indicators. Outcome indicators included occurrence of adverse reactions, pregnancy, off-label use and medication errors. Only four studies had an established threshold, all for process indicators. Stricter adherence to existing recommendations would allow for a more robust design for reaching established endpoints for RMM effectiveness evaluation. It would also infer harmonization, facilitate review and further more detailed guidance on conducting these studies.

Effectiveness of risk minimization measures for the use of cilostazol in United Kingdom, Spain, Sweden, and Germany.

PurposeThe purpose of the study is to evaluate the effectiveness of risk minimization measures—labeling changes and communication to health care professionals—recommended by the European Medicines Agency for use of cilostazol for the treatment of intermittent claudication in Europe.MethodsObservational study of cilostazol in The Health Improvement Network (United Kingdom), EpiChron Cohort (Spain), SIDIAP (Spain), Swedish National Databases, and GePaRD (Germany).Among new users of cilostazol, we compared the prevalence of conditions targeted by the risk minimization measures in the periods before (2002‐2012) and after (2014) implementation. Conditions evaluated were prevalence of smoking, cardiovascular conditions, concurrent use of ≥2 antiplatelet agents, concurrent use of potent CYP3A4/CYP2C19 inhibitors and high‐dose cilostazol, early monitoring of all users, and continuous monitoring of users at high cardiovascular risk.ResultsWe included 22 593 and 1821 new users of cilostazol before and after implementation of risk minimization measures, respectively. After implementation, the frequency of several conditions related to the labeling changes improved in all the study populations: prevalence of use decreased between 13% (EpiChron) and 57% (SIDIAP), frequency of cardiovascular contraindications decreased between 8% (GePaRD) and 84% (EpiChron), and concurrent use of high‐dose cilostazol and potent CYP3A4/CYP2C19 inhibitors decreased between 6% (Sweden) and 100% (EpiChron). The frequency of other conditions improved in most study populations, except smoking, which decreased only in EpiChron (48% reduction).ConclusionsThis study indicates that the risk minimization measures implemented by the EMA for the use of cilostazol have been effective in all European countries studied, except for smoking cessation before initiating cilostazol, which remains an area of improvement.

A review of studies evaluating the effectiveness of risk minimisation measures in Europe using the European Union electronic Register of Post-Authorization Studies.

PurposeAn important element of risk management is the planning and implementation of risk minimisation measures (RMMs) and the evaluation of their effectiveness by process or outcome indicators. The aim of this review is to summarize the characteristics of risk minimisation (RM) effectiveness studies in Europe and provide an overview of RMMs and their effectiveness.MethodsThis was a qualitative review of RM effectiveness studies in the European Union electronic Register of Post‐Authorization Studies (EU PAS Register); data extracted included study design, population, sample size, data sources, drug information, RMMs, study period, indicators, and their reported effectiveness.ResultsOf the 872 records in the EU PAS Register, 19 studies evaluating the effectiveness of RMMs were included. Eleven were cross‐sectional surveys and 8 used secondary data sources. Eighty‐nine percent (17/19) evaluated additional RMMs (used when routine RMMs are considered insufficient), and 36% (7/19) evaluated changes in routine RMMs (applicable to all medicinal products). A total of 42 effectiveness indicators were identified: 18 process and 24 outcomes. Half of the indicators (21/42) were successful; 2% (1/42) indicators were partially successful; 17% (7/42) indicators were inconclusive. Effectiveness of the remaining 31% (13/42) indicators could not be determined owing to limited information. The United Kingdom was the most frequent country for the conduct of RM effectiveness studies.ConclusionsMost of the included studies evaluated additional RMMs. Half of the effectiveness indicators (process and/or outcome) were reported as successful. This review provides evidence to support the development of future guidance on the effectiveness of RM in Europe.

An Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Risk Minimization Measures for Tigecycline in the European Union

Risk minimization measures (RMM) were implemented from February 2011 in the European Union to address risks of superinfection, off-label use and lack of efficacy associated with tigecycline. The objective of this study was to evaluate RMM effectiveness by describing prescription patterns among adults and children treated with any dose of tigecycline for any indication pre- and post-RMM implementation; incidence proportions of superinfection and lack of efficacy among adults treated with approved doses of tigecycline for complicated intra-abdominal infection and complicated skin and soft tissue infection were also evaluated. This was an observational, retrospective chart-abstraction study, including charts from 777 patients (399 pre-RMM, 378 post-RMM) at 13 sites across Austria, Germany, Italy, Greece and the United Kingdom (UK). Potential superinfection and lack of efficacy cases among those using tigecycline for on-label indication, age, dose, and duration were adjudicated. The distribution of indications for tigecycline was analyzed overall (i.e. across both study periods) and stratified by study period. Numbers and incidence proportions of superinfection and lack of efficacy cases (potential and adjudicated) were calculated overall and by study period. Off-label use (indication or age) decreased from 54.2% [95% confidence interval (95% CI): 49.0, 59.3%] pre-RMM to 35.7% (95% CI 30.4, 41.2%) post-RMM. Overall, 45.7% (95% CI 41.9, 49.5%) of patients were prescribed tigecycline off-label; the most commonly reported off-label indications were characterized as “other” (25.5%), hospital acquired pneumonia (8.2%), other pneumonia (6.3%), bacteremia (5.2%) and diabetic foot infection (1.5%). Across study periods, incidence proportions of definite or probable superinfection and lack of efficacy in adults treated for approved indications, authorized treatment doses and duration were 4.5% (95% CI 2.1, 8.4%) and 5.5% (95% CI 2.8, 9.7%), respectively. Off-label use of tigecycline decreased following RMM implementation. Overall incidence proportions of definite or probable superinfection and lack of efficacy were low. EU PAS register number: EUPAS3674