Implementation Of Health Services Research Articles

Test Smart, Treat Smart-using clinician feedback to adapt a catheter-associated urinary tract infection intervention for spinal cord injury.

Catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI) prevention is a major target for hospital quality metrics because it is linked to increased morbidity, mortality, and health care costs. Health care systems use strict protocols surrounding catheterization and maintenance, which often disregard the clinical needs of special populations (eg, spinal cord injury [SCI]). However, for populations that rely on chronic instrumentation of the bladder, asymptomatic (ie, nonpathogenic) bacterial colonization in the bladder is common but not linked to adverse outcomes. Additionally, alterations in neurologic and sensory function after SCI make it difficult for clinicians to discern asymptomatic bacteriuria from acute urinary tract infection requiring antibiotics. Institutional policies for screening urine during SCI annual exams often lead to detection of bacteriuria but create a clinical decision-making challenge when determining whether antibiotic treatment is appropriate. To conduct preimplementation SCI-focused adaptations to the evidence-based practice (EBP) "Kicking CAUTI"-to develop a guide for SCI providers surrounding testing and treatment of CAUTI. Four 1-hour focus groups were conducted with SCI clinicians (prescribers and nursing staff) to assess insights on needed modifications to adapt Kicking CAUTI for SCI. The Framework for Reporting Adaptations and Modifications to Evidence-based Implementation Strategies (FRAME-IS) was used to plan and report adaptations in this work and the integrated Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services (i-PARIHS) framework to guide adaptation of the EBP for the SCI population. Content and thematic analysis guided our process. The clinical algorithm was simplified, a urinary symptom assessment added, and provider- and patient-facing educational materials were developed to support implementation efforts to create the Test Smart Treat Smart Intervention. Traditional CAUTI protocols do not adequately address the needs of those with SCI and modifications are needed. Provider feedback provides valuable insights when adapting population appropriate interventions.

Advanced Practice Nurse-Led Research: Challenges and Approaches to Digital Health Programs' Evaluation Using Big Data.

Advanced practice nurse leaders are in key positions within health systems to provide time and resources for implementation and evaluation of digital health services. As virtual monitoring programs become more embedded within nursing, nurse leaders and educators need to ensure that nurses are prepared to work within interprofessional teams to administer and evaluate them. This article discusses challenges and implementation strategy considerations for data curation and analysis using large datasets from the Medicaid population for research.

Preference of mHealth versus in-person treatment for depression and post-traumatic stress disorder in Kenya: demographic and clinical characteristics

ObjectivesWe conducted an implementation science mental health treatment study in western Kenya, testing strategies for scale up of evidence-based mental health services for common adult disorders using a non-specialist workforce, integrated with existing primary care (Sequential Multiple, Assignment Randomized Trial of non-specialist-delivered psychotherapy (Interpersonal Psychotherapy) and/or medication (fluoxetine) for major depression and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) (SMART DAPPER)). Because study launch coincided with the COVID-19 pandemic, participants were allowed to attend treatment visits via mHealth (audio-only mobile phone) or in-person. We conducted a secondary data analysis of the parent study to evaluate preference for mHealth or in-person treatment among our study participants, including rationale for choosing in-person or mHealth treatment modality, and comparison of baseline demographic and clinical characteristics.Design, setting, participants and interventionsParticipants were public sector primary care patients at Kisumu County Hospital in western Kenya with major depression and/or PTSD and were individually randomised to non-specialist delivery of evidence-based psychotherapy or medication (n=2162).OutcomesTreatment modality preference and rationale were ascertained before randomised assignment to treatment arm (psychotherapy or medication). The parent SMART DAPPER study baseline assessment included core demographic (age, gender, relationship status, income, clinic transport time and cost) and clinical data (eg, depression and PTSD symptoms, trauma exposures, medical comorbidities and history of mental healthcare). Given that this evaluation of mHealth treatment preference sought to identify the demographic and clinical characteristics of participants who chose in-person or mHealth treatment modality, we included most SMART DAPPER core measurement domains (not all subcategories).Results649 (30.3%) SMART DAPPER participants preferred treatment via mHealth, rather than in person. The most cited rationales for choosing mHealth were affordability (18.5%) (eg, no transportation cost) and convenience (12.9%). On multivariate analysis, compared with those who preferred in-person treatment, participants who chose mHealth were younger and had higher constraints on receiving in-person treatment, including transport time 1.004 (1.00, 1.007) and finances 0.757 (0.612, 0.936). Higher PTSD symptoms 0.527 (0.395, 0.702) and higher disability 0.741 (0.559, 0.982) were associated with preference for in-person treatment.ConclusionsTo our knowledge, this is the first study of public sector mental healthcare delivered by non-specialists via mHealth for major depression and/or PTSD in Sub-Saharan Africa. Our finding that mHealth treatment is preferred by approximately one-third of participants, particularly younger individuals with barriers to in-person care, may inform future mHealth research to (1) address knowledge gaps in mental health service implementation and (2) improve mental healthcare access to evidence-based treatment.Trial registration numberNCT03466346.

Co-designing a blueprint for spreading person-centered, Whole Health care to HIV specialty care settings: a mixed methods protocol

BackgroundSince 2013, the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) has advanced a person-centered, Whole Health (WH) System of Care, a shift from a disease-oriented system to one that prioritizes “what matters most” to patients in their lives. Whole Health is predicated on patient-provider interactions marked by a multi-level understanding of health and trusted relationships that promote well-being. Presently, WH implementation has been focused largely in primary care settings, yet the goal is to effect a system-wide transformation of care so that Veterans receive WH across VHA clinical settings, including specialty care. This sort of system-wide cultural transformation is difficult to implement.MethodsThis three-aim mixed methods study will result in a co-designed implementation blueprint for spreading WH from primary to specialty care settings. Taking HIV specialty care as an illustrative case- because of its diverse models of relationships to primary care - to explore how to spread WH through specialty care settings. We will use the integrated Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services (i-PARIHS) framework to organize quantitative and qualitative data and identify key determinants of WH receipt among Veterans living with HIV. Through a co-design process, we develop an adaptable implementation blueprint that identifies and matches implementation strategies to different HIV specialty care configurations.DiscussionThis study will co-design a flexible implementation blueprint for spreading WH from VHA primary care throughout HIV specialty care settings. This protocol contributes to the science of end-user engagement while also answering calls for greater transparency in how implementation strategies are identified, tailored, and spread.

Identifying factors influencing emerging innovations in hospital discharge decision making in response to system stress: a qualitative study

BackgroundThe purpose of this qualitative study was to identify emergent rehabilitation innovations and clinician perceptions influencing their implementation and outcomes related to hospital discharge decision-making during the Coronavirus 2019 pandemic.MethodsRehabilitation clinicians were recruited from the Veterans Affairs Health Care System and participated in individual semi-structured interviews guided by the integrated Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services (i-PARIHS) framework. Data were analyzed using a rapid qualitative, deductive team-based approach informed by directed content analysis.ResultsTwenty-three rehabilitation clinicians representing physical (N = 11) and occupational therapy (N = 12) participated in the study. Three primary themes were generated: (1) Innovation: emerging innovations in discharge processes included perceived increases in team collaboration, shifts in caseload prioritization, and alternative options for post-acute care. (2) Recipients: innovations emerged as approaches to communicating discharge recommendations changed (in-person to virtual) and strong patient/family preferences to discharge to the home challenged collaborative goal setting; and (3) Context: the ability of rehabilitation clinicians to innovate and the form of innovations were influenced by the broader hospital system, interdisciplinary team dynamics, and policy fluctuations. Innovations described by participants included (1) use of technological modalities for interdisciplinary collaboration, (2) expansion of telehealth modalities to deliver care in the home, (3) changes in acute care case prioritization, and (4) alternative options for discharge directly to home.ConclusionsOur findings reinforce that rehabilitation clinicians developed innovative strategies to quickly adapt to multiple systems-level factors that were changing in the face of the COVID-19 pandemic. Future research is needed to assess the impact of innovations, remediate unintended consequences, and evaluate the implementation of promising innovations to respond to emerging healthcare delivery needs more rapidly.

Using Implementation Science to Implement Evidence-Based Practice: A Discursive Paper.

The purpose of this manuscript is to offer an overview of knowledge regarding Evidence-Based Practice and implementation science. It addresses the question: What are the EBP implementation models used in nursing settings? Discursive paper. The databases were searched with the following keywords: 'Nursing Faculty', 'Nurse educator', 'Academic', 'clinic', 'Evidence-based implementation', 'evidence-based practice', 'implementation', 'implementation science', 'undergraduate', 'nurse'. The search strategy aims to identify published studies. Eight databases were searched. There are specific implementation models for implementing EBP: the IOWA Model, the Stetler Model, the Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence-Based Practice Model, the Stevens Star Model, the Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services (PARIHS), the Advancing Research and Clinical practice through close collaboration (ARCC) model. They were analysed according to the Nilsen classification. An evidence-based implementation project must be structured. First, it is necessary to choose an implementation model, then identify one or more implementation strategies, and finally, plan evaluation for implementation outcome. The use of implementation science ensures successful implementation or at least highlights barriers that need adjustment. Effective utilisation of implementation science facilitates the transfer of obtained results to similar contexts. Implementation science complements the EBP process perfectly and ensures the proper implementation of evidence. EBP mentors now have the entire structure of implementation science to succeed in implementing evidence-based data in both academic and clinical settings. The discursive paper addresses the difficulties of implementing evidence in academic or clinical settings. Implementation science is the bridge between evidence and practice. Nurses now have everything they need to implement evidence-based practice successfully. There was no patient or public involvement in the design or writing of this discursive article.

Feasibility of a culturally adapted technology-delivered, family-based childhood obesity intervention for Latino/Hispanic families in rural Nebraska: the Hispanic Family Connections study protocol

IntroductionAddressing childhood obesity risk factors like home environment, parental roles, excess weight, physical activity and healthy eating among Latino/Hispanic (L/H) families living in rural communities is an important priority. However,...

Development of Protocol for the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) task force study to strengthen the implementation of National Programme for Prevention and Control of Non-Communicable Diseases (NP-NCD) in tribal population.

Understanding the health culture of tribal community is important as health problems among tribal communities and their care is influenced by sociocultural factors, which will help in the implementation of health services. The conventional way of improving the access for the general populations may not suit the tribal populations owing to their distinct culture and owing to health systems factors as well. A stepwise process was followed for the development of a protocol to study to strengthen the implementation of National Programme for Prevention and Control of Non-Communicable Diseases. The study was planned to be carried out across six tribal districts of India. A detailed protocol was built around Implementation Research Logic Model, primarily as a method for planning, executing, reporting, and synthesizing the implementation.

A qualitative study identifying implementation strategies using the i-PARIHS framework to increase access to pre-exposure prophylaxis at federally qualified health centers in Mississippi

BackgroundMississippi (MS) experiences disproportionally high rates of new HIV infections and limited availability of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP). Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs) are poised to increase access to PrEP. However, little is known about the implementation strategies needed to successfully integrate PrEP services into FQHCs in MS.PurposeThe study had two objectives: identify barriers and facilitators to PrEP use and to develop tailored implementation strategies for FQHCs.MethodsSemi-structured interviews were conducted with 19 staff and 17 PrEP-eligible patients in MS FQHCs between April 2021 and March 2022. The interview was guided by the integrated-Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services (i-PARIHS) framework which covered PrEP facilitators and barriers. Interviews were coded according to the i-PARIHS domains of context, innovation, and recipients, followed by thematic analysis of these codes. Identified implementation strategies were presented to 9 FQHC staff for feedback.ResultsData suggested that PrEP use at FQHCs is influenced by patient and clinic staff knowledge with higher levels of knowledge reflecting more PrEP use. Perceived side effects are the most significant barrier to PrEP use for patients, but participants also identified several other barriers including low HIV risk perception and untrained providers. Despite these barriers, patients also expressed a strong motivation to protect themselves, their partners, and their communities from HIV. Implementation strategies included education and provider training which were perceived as acceptable and appropriate.ConclusionsThough patients are motivated to increase protection against HIV, multiple barriers threaten uptake of PrEP within FQHCs in MS. Educating patients and providers, as well as training providers, are promising implementation strategies to overcome these barriers.

Barriers and Facilitators to the Implementation of Digital Health Services for People With Musculoskeletal Conditions in the Primary Health Care Setting: Systematic Review.

In recent years, the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of digital health services for people with musculoskeletal conditions have increasingly been studied and show potential. Despite the potential of digital health services, their use in primary care is lagging. A thorough implementation is needed, including the development of implementation strategies that potentially improve the use of digital health services in primary care. The first step in designing implementation strategies that fit the local context is to gain insight into determinants that influence implementation for patients and health care professionals. Until now, no systematic overview has existed of barriers and facilitators influencing the implementation of digital health services for people with musculoskeletal conditions in the primary health care setting. This systematic literature review aims to identify barriers and facilitators to the implementation of digital health services for people with musculoskeletal conditions in the primary health care setting. PubMed, Embase, and CINAHL were searched for eligible qualitative and mixed methods studies up to March 2024. Methodological quality of the qualitative component of the included studies was assessed with the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. A framework synthesis of barriers and facilitators to implementation was conducted using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). All identified CFIR constructs were given a reliability rating (high, medium, or low) to assess the consistency of reporting across each construct. Overall, 35 studies were included in the qualitative synthesis. Methodological quality was high in 34 studies and medium in 1 study. Barriers (-) of and facilitators (+) to implementation were identified in all 5 CFIR domains: "digital health characteristics" (ie, commercial neutral [+], privacy and safety [-], specificity [+], and good usability [+]), "outer setting" (ie, acceptance by stakeholders [+], lack of health care guidelines [-], and external financial incentives [-]), "inner setting" (ie, change of treatment routines [+ and -], information incongruence (-), and support from colleagues [+]), "characteristics of the healthcare professionals" (ie, health care professionals' acceptance [+ and -] and job satisfaction [+ and -]), and the "implementation process" (involvement [+] and justification and delegation [-]). All identified constructs and subconstructs of the CFIR had a high reliability rating. Some identified determinants that influence implementation may be facilitators in certain cases, whereas in others, they may be barriers. Barriers and facilitators were identified across all 5 CFIR domains, suggesting that the implementation process can be complex and requires implementation strategies across all CFIR domains. Stakeholders, including digital health intervention developers, health care professionals, health care organizations, health policy makers, health care funders, and researchers, can consider the identified barriers and facilitators to design tailored implementation strategies after prioritization has been carried out in their local context.

Implementation of a population mental health and wellness text-message service: a mixed-methods study

BackgroundDespite the growing adoption of digital health tools as a means to support mental health, many individuals remain unaware of the variety of mental health resources available to them through this format. To address this knowledge gap, this study advanced the design, development, and implementation of a text-based service called SaskWell to raise awareness of evidence based mental health resources and create more immediate connections to these tools. The two primary objectives of the study were to assess and evaluate the adoption of SaskWell by focusing on user acceptance, satisfaction, and perceived benefit, and to identify factors which contributed to user engagement with the SaskWell text-based service. Both quantitative and qualitative data contributed to the final study results.ResultsThis study utilized a co-designed text-messaging service to provide residents of Saskatchewan an important connection to digital mental health and wellness resources during the height of the COVID-19 pandemic. Using the RE-AIM framework as an implementation guide, four distinct cycles of SaskWell were delivered with modifications to the service in each subsequent cycle based on user engagement, feedback, and the direction of a community advisory group. Quantitative data was collected through user engagement text message response data, along with enrollment and exit surveys, while semi-structured interviews served as the primary means of qualitative data collection. In addition to the quantitative user data, these user interviews resulted in themes exploring motivation to sign-up for the service, perceptions of texting as a mechanism to deliver mental health resources, the impact of SaskWell on mental health and well-being, and beliefs on the future potential of text-based mental health supports.ConclusionsBoth the user engagement survey and the qualitative data supported the worth of ongoing efforts to refine and extend the use of text messaging as a means to engage citizens around the awareness and use of digital mental health and wellness resources. As the pandemic has receded into the background in many peoples’ daily lives, for healthcare providers, and others who continue to be impacted more heavily by the persistent challenges of this global event, this type of service may continue to be timely.

Applying the extension for community healthcare outcomes (ECHO) model to promote collaborative and effective school mental health services.

School staff increasingly seek to implement evidence-based school mental health services to promote student mental health. However, barriers to accessing programming and support mean that implementing these programs is difficult. Popular strategies to address these challenges, like one time professional development, often fail to be effective or sustainable. This study used mixed methods to evaluate how a set of training activities-sequential online learning modules combined with interprofessional telementoring, following the extension for community healthcare outcomes (ECHO) model-influenced provision of school mental health services. School counselors, nurses, psychologists, and social workers (n = 46) participated in training activities, which included nine, cohort-based ECHO sessions and 12 modules. We used a concurrent mixed methods design in which quantitative (implementation data and pre-post surveys) and qualitative (posttraining focus groups with a subset of participants, n = 11) data were used to evaluate training. Quantitative results indicated statistically significant pre-post improvements in participants' clinical self-efficacy (d = .83) and knowledge of evidence-based practices (d = .37). Qualitative data corroborated quantitative results. Post training, focus groups described positive reactions, learning, and behavior change, particularly with respect to equitable service provision and interprofessional teaming. ECHO appeared to facilitate the application of evidence-based strategies to real-life practice and improved participants' understanding of effective coordination of services. Taken together, findings suggest that group-based telementoring may be a high-impact strategy for supporting the implementation of effective, culturally specific, and collaborative school mental health services. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

Effectiveness of Indigenously Developed Clinical Supervision in Therapeutic Setting

Clinical supervision is a process in which a supervisor assists the supervisee in reflecting their own clinical work in a therapeutic setting. In this regard, cultural competency is important in clinical supervision and religion plays a substantial role in culture. Therefore, the American Psychological Association has focused on religion in psychology. However, despite acceptance of the importance of religious integration into clinical practice, very few psychologists receive training, which is important for addressing the integration of religious values in therapeutic settings. Therefore, the current study was designed to assess the effectiveness of indigenously developed clinical supervision, based on the general guidelines of the development model of supervision. It was designed for an inclusive environment that respects diverse spiritual and religious perspectives. The study included 15 supervisees who received clinical supervision from trained clinical supervisors who were trained on an indigenously developed clinical supervision model. Supervisors provided regular supervision to the supervisee over a period of six months. The effectiveness of the protocol was measured by using the Clinical Skills Assessment Rating Form (CSA-RF). The CSA-RF is 32 items scale, facilitating in the measurement of the effectiveness of the protocol in the five domains of demonstrating professional therapeutic engagement, creating a secure base, formulation, facilitating mutual understanding and session structure. The results showed that the supervisee who received supervision through the indigenous clinical supervision protocol brought significant changes in their therapeutic skills (p=.001). These findings have significant implications in the development and implementation of mental health services, particularly in therapeutic settings.

The implementation study of nurses’ work related low back pain prevention and care guideline: A quasi-experimental study

AimTo understand the implementation process and outcomes of nurses' work related low back pain (WLBP) prevention and care guideline. BackgroundWLBP is a common occupational injury for clinical nurses. We developed the first evidence-based guideline of nurses' WLBP prevention and care of its kind both at home and abroad, and it is necessary for us to explore its feasibility, appropriateness and effectiveness in practice. MethodsBased on the model of the integrated Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services, we performed a four-phase implementation study in a tertiary hospital. The study was a non-randomized concurrent controlled trial design，and multilevel measures were examined including implementation outcomes and clinical outcomes. ResultsFor the implementation outcomes, the tailored recommendations of the guideline were found to be acceptable, appropriate, feasible, and well adopted both at the unit level and the hospital level. The clinical outcomes indicated that, compared with the control unit, nurses of the treatment unit performed better in awareness, knowledge, practice of WLBP prevention and care. ConclusionsThe implementation study supports the successful application of the guideline, which can serve as a valuable evidence-based document to improve back health of nursing personnel.

Goal-oriented temperature management in severely traumatized children in the emergency department: an evidence-based practice project.

Hypothermia commonly occurs in trauma patients. Evidence-based practices for hypothermia prevention are not strictly followed by all medical staff in the emergency department. This study aimed to assess compliance with evidence-based practices regarding goal-oriented temperature management for severely traumatized children in a Chinese hospital. This project used the JBI Evidence Implementation Framework to translate evidence into practice. The Integrated-Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services (i-PARIHS) framework was used to identify barriers to compliance with best practices. A goal-oriented temperature management strategy for trauma patients was developed based on the identified barriers, along with a simulation training module, and the supply of warming materials. Field observation, review of medical records, and interviews with medical staff and patients were used to assess baseline and follow-up audit compliance with best practices. Twelve criteria were audited in the baseline and follow-up audits, with 11 and 37 trauma patients, respectively. In the follow-up audit, compliance with all criteria increased, with a reduction in shivering and cold discomfort scores. Except for two patients who died, hypothermia did not occur in any of the patients. The JBI Evidence Implementation Framework was used to successfully improve compliance with best practices. Future audits should be conducted to sustain the evidence-based behavior of all medical staff. http://links.lww.com/IJEBH/A234.

Avoidable Mortality in Korea 1997-2001: Temporal Trend and its Contribution to All-cause Mortality.

This study analyzed the mortality trends from avoidable causes in Korea from 1997 to 2021, to estimate its contribution to the overall mortality in different subgroups, including. Gender, age, and cause of disease. The all-cause and avoidable mortality were presented as a time series plot and average annual percent change. Trend of avoidable mortality was also analyzed by subgroups, disease causes and the percentage attributed to each causes. The decline in avoidable mortality accounted for 82.6% of all-cause mortality reduction. Preventable mortality showed a more pronounced decline than treatable mortality, explaining 72.3% of the avoidable mortality reduction. In 1997-2001, avoidable death occurred in 72.2% (537,024 cases) of all-cause deaths, which declined to 60.0% (342,979 cases) in 2017-2021. The contribution of avoidable mortality in the decline of all-cause morality was greater in males (83.6%) than in females (79.3%). The decline in avoidable mortality and its contribution to the all-cause mortality reduction implies general improvement of the population health in Korea. Nevertheless, the heterogenous trend within different subgroups warrants more equitable design and implementation of health services and policies.

SNAP: Supportive non-invasive ventilation for acute chest syndrome prevention for hospitalized children with sickle cell disease: Perspectives of patients, parents, and the healthcare team.

Acute chest syndrome (ACS) often develops during hospitalizations for sickle cell disease (SCD) vaso-occlusive episodes and may be triggered by a combination of chest wall splinting, opioid use, hypoventilation, and atelectasis. In 2017, Boston Medical Center's general pediatric inpatient unit instituted the novel use of bi-level positive airway pressure (BiPAP) as "supportive non-invasive ventilation for ACS prevention" (SNAP) to prevent ACS and respiratory decompensation. The goals of this qualitative study were to identify perceived benefits, harms, facilitators, and barriers to use of SNAP. We conducted semi-structured key informant interviews at three sites with different levels of SNAP implementation (Site 1: extensive implementation; Site 2: limited implementation; Site 3: not yet implemented) regarding experiences with and/or perceptions of SNAP. Interviews and coding were guided by the Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services (PARiHS) framework. Thirty-four participants (physicians, nurses, respiratory therapists, child life specialists, psychologists, youth with SCD, and parents) completed interviews. Major themes included: (i) participants perceive BiPAP as effective at preventing ACS, and for those with medically stable ACS, for preventing respiratory decompensation. (ii) BiPAP use is appropriate on the general pediatric inpatient unit for medically stable patients with SCD. (iii) Improving the patient experience is the most important factor to optimize acceptance of BiPAP by patients and families. SNAP is perceived as effective and appropriate for hospitalized pediatric patients with SCD. Improving the patient experience is the biggest challenge. These data will inform a future protocol for a multicenter hybrid effectiveness/implementation trial of SNAP.

Variability in public health programming and priorities to address health inequities across public health units in Ontario, Canada.

In 2018, Ontario Public Health Standards were updated to include the foundational Health Equity Standard to guide planning, implementation, and evaluation of public health programs and services. Public health units (PHUs), the regional public health bodies, are now required to address health equity through four requirements: (a) Assessing and Reporting; (b) Modifying and Orienting Public Health Interventions; (c) Engaging in Multi-sectoral Collaboration; and (d) Health Equity Analysis, Policy Development, and Advancing Healthy Public Policies. This qualitative descriptive study explored how the 27 participating PHUs (out of 34) serving urban (N = 10), mixed urban-rural (N = 15), and rural (N = 9) populations addressed the Health Equity Standard. Using document analysis, we inductively and deductively coded the content of 68 PHU Annual Service Plan and Budget Submissions from a 3-year period (2018-2020) received from the 27 PHUs. Emergent categories were organized into the four requirements and one additional emergent theme: Organizational Implementation of Health Equity. The approaches of embedding health equity into PHUs' activities varied across groups. Urban PHUs presented more diverse strategies, including working with a larger number of organizations, and participating in academic research projects. We found more process standardization and greater discussion of capacity building in urban and mixed urban-rural PHUs. Rural PHUs strategically addressed the needs of their diverse populations through relationship building with Indigenous communities. Findings suggest broad implementation of health equity approaches in public health independent of PHUs' geographic size and population dispersion, though strategies and key challenges differ across units.

Participatory action research on framework of promoting action on research implementation in health services: A pathway to evidence-based changes in the development of medical science education

Participatory action research on framework of promoting action on research implementation in health services: A pathway to evidence-based changes in the development of medical science education

Türk Yetişkinler İçin Öznel Yaşam Kalitesi Ölçeği Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması

As defined by the World Health Organization, quality of life is a concept that is associated with the individual's personal perception in the context of the culture, value systems, and life experiences in which they live. Therefore, quality of life measurement requires a multifaceted process consisting of both objective and subjective dimensions. However, the fact that quality of life is based on subjective perceptions leads to the lack of a standardized measurement tool and a lack of consensus in the measurement of quality of life. This research is based on the assumption that subjective perceptions are the main determinant in the evaluation of quality of life. In this context, the aim of the study is to develop a valid and reliable measurement tool that can measure non-economic quality of life elements based on people's subjective perceptions. The study group consisted of 742 adults aged 18 and over, including Kırıkkale High Specialization Hospital staff and Ankara Yenimahalle Municipality employees. As a result of the analyses, a structure consisting of five sub-dimensions and 17 items that can be considered a valid and reliable measurement tool for measuring subjective quality of life was obtained. This study emphasizes the subjective dimension of the concept of quality of life and focuses on individuals' evaluation of quality of life based on their own experiences and perceptions. The obtained measurement tool can be used in further research in the field of quality of life and can contribute to the literature in this field. It can also be an important source of information for the planning and implementation of health policies and services. Keywords: World Health Organization, subjective quality of life, Kırıkkale Yüksek İhtisas Hospital, Ankara Yenimahalle Municipality