Implementation Of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocol Research Articles

Implementation of ERAS Protocols: In Theory and Practice.

The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway is a perioperative care pathway intended to facilitate early recovery and minimize hospital stays among patients undergoing major surgery. Critical factors for successful ERAS implementation, which may vary depending on care processes, include a multidisciplinary team, organizational commitment to change, and a real-time system for compliance and outcome audits. As most clinicians and health organizations can attest, incorporating and implementing new evidence-based practice changes almost always involves overcoming systemic challenges and obstacles. The same holds true for ERAS programs. The main barriers to ERAS protocol implementation have been resistance to change, lack of time and resources, and inadequate communication and coordination among departments. According to evidence-based ERAS guidelines, the best way to efficiently implement all recommendations into practice is to discover. Implementation science aims to identify and address care gaps, support change in practice, and enhance healthcare quality. Implementation research should also build a robust and generalizable evidence base to inform implementation practice. Most implementation investigations focus on one of two approaches to achieving change. Implementation can progress through top-down or bottom-up processes depending on factors such as national policies, organizational properties, or the implementation culture of society, especially for health issues. Although the ERAS guidelines are based on evidence-based knowledge, only a limited number of health centers around the world have officially been able to implement them. The purpose of this review is to analyze the implementation of the ERAS pathways in theory and practice in Turkey, considering the absence of an ERAS-qualified center in Turkey.

Transforming care: Optimizing ERAS pathway in breast cancer surgery with latissimus dorsi flap.

This study aims to establish, execute, and assess the effectiveness of a perioperative enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) clinical care pathway in breast reconstruction patients with LD flap breast cancer treatment. The goal is to improve early recovery outcomes, reduce hospitalization time, and enhance patient satisfaction by implementing a standardized approach to postoperative care. This study was conducted at the University of Malaya Medical Center. The outcomes of 21 breast cancer patients who underwent autologous reconstructive breast surgery with the latissimus dorsi (LD) flap within six months before the implementation of the ERAS pathway (pre-ERAS) were compared with 26 patients who underwent the same surgery with the ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane (ESP) block for the (ERAS protocol implementation) cohort. The study was conducted from November 2019 to October 2020. The length of hospital stay, amount of analgesic usage, and incidence of postoperative nausea vomiting (PONV) were recorded. The implementation of the ERAS clinical care pathway resulted in shorter hospital stays compared with the preceding care. On average, ERAS patients were mostly discharged on Day 2 post-surgery, whereas pre-ERAS patients were mostly discharged on Day 7. ERAS patients had a lower incidence of PONV from Days 1 to 5, starting with 88.5% not experiencing the condition on Days 1 and 2 and increasing to 100% on Day 5. All pre-ERAS patients experienced PONV in the first 5days post-surgery. Fewer ERAS patients required antiemetics post-surgery (88.5%) compared with pre-ERAS patients (42.9%). The implementation of the ERAS protocol as part of clinical care in autologous reconstructive breast surgery with the LD flap can improve recovery by shortening hospital stay, decreasing the use of analgesia, and alleviating PONV.

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocols in One- or Two-Level Posterior Lumbar Fusion: Improving Postoperative Outcomes.

Background/Objectives: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols optimize perioperative care and improve recovery. This study evaluated the effectiveness of ERAS in one- or two-level posterior lumbar fusion surgeries, focusing on perioperative medication use, pain management, and functional outcomes. Methods: Eighty-eight patients undergoing lumbar fusion surgery between March 2021 and February 2022 were allocated into pre-ERAS (n = 41) and post-ERAS (n = 47) groups. Outcomes included opioid and antiemetic consumption, pain scores (numerical rating scale (NRS)), functional recovery (Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and EuroQol 5 Dimension (EQ-5D)), and complication rates. Pain was assessed daily for the first four postoperative days and at 6 months. Linear Mixed Effects Model analysis evaluated pain trajectories. Results: The post-ERAS group showed significantly lower opioid (p = 0.005) and antiemetic (p < 0.001) use. No significant differences were observed in NRS pain scores in the first 4 postoperative days. At 6 months, the post-ERAS group reported significantly lower leg pain (p = 0.002). The time:group interaction was not significant for back (p = 0.848) or leg (p = 0.503) pain. Functional outcomes at 6 months, particularly ODI and EQ-5D scores, showed significant improvement in the post-ERAS group. Complication rates were lower in the post-ERAS group (4.3% vs. 19.5%, p = 0.024), while hospital stay and fusion rates remained similar. Conclusions: The ERAS protocol significantly reduced opioid and antiemetic use, improved long-term pain management and functional recovery, and lowered complication rates in lumbar fusion patients. These findings support the implementation of ERAS protocols in spinal surgery, emphasizing their role in enhancing postoperative care.

Current perioperative care in patients undergoing a beyond total mesorectal excision procedure for rectal cancer: What are the differences with the colorectal enhanced recovery after surgery protocol?

Patients requiring a beyond total mesorectal excision (bTME) procedure for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) and locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC) will probably benefit from enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols. However, implementation of ERAS protocols in such groups of patients is considered challenging. The aims of this study were to evaluate ERAS-related outcomes of patients with LARC or LRRC undergoing bTME and to investigate the possibility of designing a tailored ERAS protocol. This study was divided into four phases. Phase one consisted of a literature study to compare functional recovery and postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing bTME. In phase two, outcomes on ERAS care elements in bTME were retrospectively evaluated. In phase three, differences in ERAS-related outcomes and compliance of the colorectal ERAS protocol in patients who had undergone bTME were studied. In phase four, multidisciplinary team meetings were held to develop an ERAS protocol for bTME patients. Seven studies reported on ERAS-related outcomes in patients undergoing bTME. Median length of hospital stay was 9-19 days, median stay in the intensive care unit was 2-4 days and 30-day postoperative major complication rates were 22.6%-61.3%. Seventy-five bTME patients were included for retrospective analysis. In these patients, length of stay was 9.0 days and major postoperative complications were observed in 40.0%. The overall ERAS compliance was 44.4%. Compared with the colorectal ERAS protocol, the largest differences in management were observed in the use of epidural anaesthesia, the postoperative use of urethral catheters, oral intake and mobilization. Patients undergoing bTME for LARC or LRRC are substantially different from patients treated with the colorectal ERAS protocol, regarding ERAS-related outcomes. A tailored, multimodal ERAS protocol with specific modifications was developed by an expert multidisciplinary team for patients undergoing bTME for LARC or LRRC.

Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) in Pediatric Cardiac Surgery - Status quo of implementation in Europe

ObjectivesEnhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) is a multimodal care pathway to enhance recovery after surgery that is well established in various surgical disciplines. In pediatric cardiac surgery, implementation of ERAS protocols remains inconsistent. We conducted a survey of active European pediatric cardiac surgical centers to assess the current state of ERAS concepts and the current practice in perioperative pediatric cardiac care. DesignProspective, 79-item, web-based cross-sectional survey. SettingWeb-based survey endorsed by the European Association of Cardiothoracic Anesthesiology and Intensive Care (EACTAIC). ParticipantsAnesthesiologists of European pediatric cardiac surgical centers. InterventionsNone Measurements and Main resultsOut of a total of 98 centers, 50 responded. Eight responses were excluded due to incomplete survey forms or non-European location, leaving 42 responses (42,9%) for statistical analysis. Sixteen of the 42 centers (38,1%) follow an ERAS concept. Only 3 (7,1%) have formalized and detailed the ERAS concept in a written document, covering the entire perioperative period, while 13 (31%) have formalized it solely for the intraoperative period.Regarding regional and local anesthesia, 13 (31%) centers regularly practice regional anesthesia blocks, and 11 (26,2%) centers utilize wound infiltration by the surgical team. ConclusionThis European survey revealed that implementation of ERAS concepts in pediatric cardiac surgery is generally low, with considerable heterogeneity in clinical practice regarding the timing of extubation, the choice of surgical procedures triggering on-table extubation, the choice of anesthetic drugs and the use of regional anesthesia. More coordinated efforts are needed to implement ERAS concepts in pediatric cardiac surgery and harvest the benefits of ERAS concepts for the pediatric cardiac population.

Implementation of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Protocols and Return to Intended Oncologic Therapy: Where We Were and Where We are Going?

Objective: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) utilizes a multimodal, evidence-based approach to improvepatient postoperative recovery and return to functional baseline. Among gynecologic oncology patients, ERAS protocols are associated with a decrease in complication rate and shorter hospital stays. With the improved return to baseline function recovery times, oncology patients are able to begin adjuvant therapy within the recommended timeframe as to not impact overall survival. We performed a cohort study at the initiation of our gynecologic Oncology ERAD program to determine if this decreased time to planned adjuvant therapy among gynecologic oncology patients after laparotomy. Secondary endpoints included protocol adherence, length of stay, complication rates, and readmission. Methods: We performed a retrospective chart review of 137 pre-ERAS and 73 post-ERAS patients diagnosed at a NCI-designated comprehensive care center in NJ to compare gynecologic oncologic and peri-operative outcomes before and after implementation of ERAS protocols. The protocols were based on recommendations from the ERAS society for management of gynecologic and gynecologic oncologic patients. Twenty-five interventions were analyzed and 12 were included in the final analysis. Pre-ERAS patients were identified by ICD-10 diagnosis code and CPT laparotomy codes. Patient characteristics, length of hospital stay, and complications rates were recorded. Institutional review board approval was obtained from Rutgers University and the Scientific Review Board approval from the Cancer Institute of New Jersey. Results: Twenty-five protocol elements were investigated, with an overall decrease in readmission rate and complication rate between the pre- and postERAS cohorts. There was no difference in length of hospital stay (median, interquartile range of 5 [4-7] and 5 [3-7] in the pre-ERAS and post-ERAS groups, respectively (P=0.91). Similarly, the two groups did not differ based on time to intended oncologic therapy (38 [29-55] versus 37 [29-53]; P=0.94). Conclusions: This study highlights the need for further research on ERAS protocol on return to intended oncologic therapy which is known to improve overall oncologic outcomes

A Retrospective Comparison Trial Investigating Aggregate Length of Stay Post Implementation of Seven Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Protocols between 2015 and 2022.

(1) Introduction: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols can create a cultural shift that will benefit patients by significantly reducing patient length of stay when compared to an equivalent group of surgical patients not following an ERAS protocol. (2) Methods: In this retrospective study of 2236 patients in a multi-center, community-based healthcare system, matching was performed based on a multitude of variables related to demographics, comorbidities, and surgical outcomes across seven ERAS protocols. These cohorts were then compared pre and post ERAS protocol implementation. (3) Results: ERAS protocols significantly reduced hospital length of stay from 3.0 days to 2.1 days (p <0.0001). Additional significant outcomes included reductions in opioid consumption from 40 morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs) to 20 MMEs (p <0.001) and decreased pain scores on postoperative day zero (POD 0), postoperative day one (POD 1), and postoperative day two (POD 2) when stratified into mild, moderate, and severe pain (p <0.001 on all three days). (4) Conclusions: ERAS protocols aggregately reduce hospital length of stay, pain scores, and opioid consumption.

Impact of structured multicentre enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol implementation on length of stay after colorectal surgery.

Increased length of stay after surgery is associated with increased healthcare utilization and adverse patient outcomes. While enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols have been shown to reduce length of stay after colorectal surgery in trial settings, their effectiveness in real-world settings is more uncertain. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of ERAS protocol implementation on length of stay after colorectal surgery, using real-world data. In 2012, ERAS protocols were introduced at 15 Ontario hospitals as part of the iERAS study. A cohort of patients undergoing colorectal surgery treated at these hospitals between 2008 and 2019 was created using health administrative data. Mean length of stay was computed for the intervals before and after ERAS implementation. Interrupted time series analyses were performed for predefined subgroups, namely all colorectal surgery, colorectal surgery without complications, right-sided colorectal surgery, and left-sided colorectal surgery. Sensitivity analyses were then conducted using adjusted length of stay, accounting for length of stay predictors, including: patient age, sex, marginalization, co-morbidities, and diagnosis; surgeon volume of cases, years in practice, and colorectal surgery expertise; hospital volume; and other contextual factors, including procedure type and timing, surgical approach, and in-hospital complications. A total of 32 612 patients underwent colorectal surgery during the study interval. ERAS implementation led to a decrease in length of stay of 1.05 days (13.7%). Larger decreases in length of stay were seen with more complex surgeries, with a level change of 1.17 days (15.6%) noted for the subgroup of patients undergoing left-sided colorectal surgery. The observed decreases in length of stay were durable for the length of the study interval in all analyses. When adjusting for predictors of length of stay, the effect of ERAS implementation on length of stay was larger (reduction of 1.46 days). Introducing formal ERAS protocols reduces length of stay after colorectal surgery significantly, independent of temporal trends toward decreasing length of stay. These effects are durable, demonstrating that ERAS protocol implementation is an effective hospital-level intervention to reduce length of stay after colorectal surgery.

The awareness of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) cesarean delivery guidelines among anesthesiology and reanimation assistants in Turkey; a questionnaire study

BackgroundTo reduce maternal-fetal morbidity and mortality, it is becoming increasingly important for anesthetists to understand and implement enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) cesarean delivery guidelines. Our aim was to reveal the knowledge of anesthesia assistants in Turkey about ERAS during cesarean delivery and to increase their awareness of ERAS.MethodsThis descriptive study was conducted in the city of Isparta, Turkey in 2023. The survey, which was approved by the ethics committee, was distributed to participants across Turkey via e-mail and online messages. The survey comprises of a total of 42 questions evaluating perioperative ERAS recommendations.ResultsOf the 404 participants in our survey, 59.9% were associated with university hospitals and 65.8% had completed three or more years of education. A total of 87.9% of the participants were familiar with ERAS; however, only 42.8% had received ERAS training. Although 93.8% of the participants’ institutions performed a cesarean delivery, ERAS recommendations were only implemented at a rate of 48%. This may be due to the absence of an ERAS team, which was identified in our survey at a high rate of 66.6%.ConclusionAwareness about ERAS was high among the participants, but the implementation rates of some recommendations were low. The reason for this may be the inability to form a multidisciplinary team and inadequate training of participants. For this purpose, we recommend the formation of a multidisciplinary team for ERAS protocol implementation and increased participant training opportunities.

Six Years of Quality Improvement in Pectus Excavatum Repair: Implementation of Intercostal Nerve Cryoablation and ERAS Protocols for Patients Undergoing Nuss Procedure

BackgroundThe Nuss procedure for pectus excavatum is associated with prolonged hospitalizations due to pain. We evaluated implementation of intercostal nerve cryoablation and enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols on outcomes of Nuss procedures performed over six years at a single institution. MethodsThis retrospective cohort study included patients who underwent Nuss procedure from 10/2017 to 09/2023. Patients received epidurals prior to 06/2019, cryoablation from 06/2019 to 07/2021, and ERAS with cryoablation and intraoperative methadone administration after 07/2021. We used multivariable linear regression to evaluate length of stay (LOS), inpatient morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs), and discharge opioids. We assessed the balancing measures of operative time, postoperative pain scores, and complications. ResultsWe identified 62 patients; 15 who received epidurals, 18 cryoablation, and 29 cryoablation with ERAS. Cryoablation was associated with a 62.3% (p < 0.001) decrease in length of stay, an 86.6% (p < 0.001) decrease in inpatient MMEs, and a 72.9% (p < 0.001) decrease in discharge opioids. Cryoablation was additionally associated with 24.5% (p = 0.02) longer operative times and 46.4% (p = 0.04) higher postoperative day one pain scores. Subsequent implementation of an ERAS protocol was associated with a further 82.8% (p = 0.04) decrease in discharge opioids and a 25.0% (p = 0.04) decrease in postoperative day one pain scores. ConclusionsOver six years of quality improvement efforts, we found the implementation of cryoablation and ERAS protocols to be associated with a significant decrease in length of stay and opioid exposures. Protocolized pain management and cryoablation may work synergistically to improve outcomes without compromising patient experience. Level of EvidenceLevel III – Retrospective comparative study.

Challenges and Elements Hindering the Adoption of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Protocols in Colorectal Surgery and Their Resolutions: A Systematic Review.

This systematic review focuses on the various aspects of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) implementations, such as the various barriers, facilitators, and the role of teamwork. A systematic search was performed in PubMed, PubMed Central (PMC), and the Cochrane Library for studies published between the years 2018 and 2023. Inclusion criteria encompassed studies assessing the various factors hindering the implementation of ERAS protocols on patients undergoing colorectal surgery.It collectively highlights the importance of a multidisciplinary approach, continuing education, supervision, and patient involvement in achieving a successful implementation. Important findings include the positive impact of a performance improvement team, audits and feedback, and patient-centered approaches in reducing hospital length of stay, reducing inflammation, and improving patient outcomes. In addition, the study emphasizes the challenges of complete adherence to all ERAS components and suggests a simplified protocol to improve implementation. This paper also seeks to understudy the hurdles encountered during the adoption of the ERAS protocol and studies the various fundamental components of the protocol.

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS): A budding concept in neonatal intestinal surgery

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) is a multidisciplinary approach, widely used in adults and children for improving patient care with reduced length of hospital stay and medical costs. However, it is poorly established and perceived as unimplementable in neonates. Recently, ERAS guidelines consisting of 17 recommendations for perioperative care in neonatal intestinal surgery are laid down by the ERAS society. To elicit the feasibility of implementing ERAS protocol, we did an observational pilot study in neonates undergoing intestinal surgery at a tertiary centre to know the number of recommendations from ERAS guidelines already being followed routinely.Data was collected for the neonates undergoing intestinal surgery for three months. All the relevant details were noted and analysed to find out the number of recommendations from ERAS guidelines already being implemented and the postoperative outcome of these neonates.Twelve neonates underwent intestinal surgery for obstruction and atresia during the study period. Eight out of 17 ERAS guidelines were already followed as a routine protocol in all these patients. Nine patients were extubated on table, one patient was extubated within 24 hours of surgery and two patients succumbed to death. Ten neonates were discharged from hospital within 6-8 days of surgery. Many recommendations from ERAS guidelines for neonatal intestinal surgery are already being followed routinely, suggesting that the implementation of complete ERAS protocol is easily possible, which may further improve the perioperative outcome with reduced length of hospital stay.

Evaluation of ERAS protocol implementation on complex spine surgery complications and length of stay: a single institution study

BACKGROUND CONTEXTWith the goal of improving patient outcomes, the Integrated Spine Center at UT Southwestern Medical Center implemented an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol which includes pre- and postsurgery guidelines. Numerous studies have shown benefit of implementation of ERAS protocols to standardize perioperative care in line with best practices; however, the literature on complication rates, LOS, and readmissions shows mixed results. PURPOSEThe goal of this study was to investigate the impact of the ERAS protocol implementation on complication rates in the perioperative period, as well as hospital and ICU length of stay and hospital re-admission rates. STUDY DESIGN/SETTINGA retrospective cohort study was performed on all patients who underwent spine surgery between September 2016 and September 2021 at a single institution. Patients who met inclusion criteria were divided into non-ERAS and ERAS groups, and comparative statistics were used to evaluate ERAS protocol effectiveness. PATIENT SAMPLEAll patients who underwent spine surgery at UT Southwestern between September 2016 and September 2021 were evaluated for inclusion in the study. The patient sample was further refined to include only complex patient cases which were able to receive the full ERAS protocol (nonemergent admissions). OUTCOME MEASURESPresence of absence of postoperative complications including surgical site infection, AKI, DVT, MI, sepsis, pneumonia, PE, stroke, shock, and other complications were compared between groups, as were hospital and ICU length of stay, and 7, 30, and 90 day readmissions. Self-reported or functional measures were not used in outcome evaluation. METHODSA database of patient and surgery characteristics was built using an EMR query tool with spot checks performed by the authors. Control and treatment groups were matched for gender, age, BMI, ASA score, and surgery type. Total number of complication rates was compared between ERAS and non-ERAS groups, and comparative statistics were used to determine significance. RESULTSSignificant differences between ERAS versus non-ERAS groups were found in rates of UTI (6.8% vs 3.1%, respectively; p=.031), constipation (20.6% vs 11.4%, respectively; p=.001), and any complications (31.4% vs 19.4%, respectively; p<.001). There was no significant difference in the rates of other complications, in length of hospital or ICU stay, or readmissions at 7, 30, and 90 days. CONCLUSIONSImplementation of the ERAS protocol did not decrease complication rates or length of stay, and ERAS patients had significantly higher rates of UTI, constipation, and any complications. There may have been confounding factors due to the impact of COVID-19 on delivery of care, as well as misalignment between ERAS goals and outcome measures.

Implementation of an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocol for Cleft Palate Repair

Objective This study examines an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol for patients with cleft palate and hypothesizes that patients who followed the protocol would have decreased hospital length of stay and decreased narcotic usage than those who did not. Design Retrospective cohort study. Setting The study takes place at a single tertiary children's hospital. Patients All patients who underwent cleft palate repair during a 10-year period (n = 242). Interventions All patients underwent cleft palate repair with the most recent cohort following a new ERAS protocol. Main Outcome Measures Primary outcomes included hospital length of stay and narcotic usage in the first 24 hours after surgery. Results Use of local bupivacaine during surgery was associated with decreased initial 24-hour morphine equivalent usage: 2.25 vs 3.38 mg morphine equivalent (MME) (P &lt; 0.01), and a decreased hospital length of stay: 1.71 days vs 2.27 days (P &lt; 0.01). The highest 24-hour morphine equivalent a patient consumed prior to the ERAS protocol implementation was 24.53 MME, compared with 6.3 MME after implementation. Utilization of the ERAS protocol was found to be associated with a decreased hospital length of stay: 1.67 vs 2.18 days (P &lt; 0.01). Conclusions Use of the proposed ERAS protocol may lead to lower narcotic usage and decreased length of stay.

The Enhanced Recovery after Surgery Approach in Heart Valve Surgery: A Systematic Review of Clinical Studies.

Background: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols aim to reduce postoperative complications and promote earlier recovery. Although it is well established in noncardiac surgery fields, the ERAS approach has only recently been adopted in cardiac surgery. The aim of this review is to evaluate the status and implementation of ERAS protocols in patients undergoing heart valve surgery and to summarise associated clinical results. Methods: A literature search for the period January 2015 and January 2024 was performed through online databases. Clinical studies (randomised controlled trials and cohort studies) on patients undergoing heart valve surgical procedures and comparing ERAS and conventional approaches were included. The data extracted covered studies and populations characteristics, early outcomes and the features of each ERAS protocol. Results: There were 14 studies that fulfilled the final search criteria and were ultimately included in the review. Overall, 5142 patients were identified in the 14 studies, with 2501 in ERAS groups and 2641 patients who were representative of control groups. Seven experiences exclusively included patients who underwent heart valve surgery. Twelve out of fourteen protocols involved multiple interventions from the preoperative to postoperative phase, while two studies reported actions limited to intraoperative and postoperative care. We found high heterogeneity among the included protocols regarding key actions targeted for improvement and measured outcomes. All the studies showed that ERAS pathways can be safely adopted in cardiac surgery and in most of the experiences were associated with shorter mechanical ventilation time, reduced postoperative opioid use and reduced ICU and hospital stays. Conclusions: As demonstrated in noncardiac surgery, the adoption of structured ERAS protocols has the potential to improve results in patients undergoing heart valve surgery. Further evidence based on larger populations is needed, including more homogenous pathways and reporting further outcomes in terms of patient satisfaction, recovery and quality of life after surgery.

Post-Caesarean Rehabilitation: Evaluation Of Practices

Background: Early Rehabilitation, "Fast-Track Surgery," or Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols have shown significant benefits in various surgical procedures, including caesarean sections. These protocols aim to expedite recovery, reduce hospital stays, and minimize complications through a multidisciplinary approach. Despite their proven effectiveness, the implementation of such protocols in post-caesarean recovery remains uneven and warrants further investigation. Objective: This study aims to evaluate the current practices of early post-caesarean rehabilitation, focusing on pain management, early nutritional intake, mobilization, and mother-child bonding to identify gaps and opportunities for improvement. Methods: A prospective observational multicenter study was conducted between January and April 2021 at the Maternity and Neonatology Center of Tunis and the Principal Military Hospital of Tunis. The study involved 170 parturients undergoing caesarean section under spinal anesthesia, excluding those with contraindications. Data were collected using a standardized form, covering demographic details, medical history, surgical and anesthesia details, and post-operative recovery metrics, including pain assessment (VAS scores), timing of first oral intake, mobilization, and mother-child bonding. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 25. Results: The average age of parturients was 30 ± 5 years. A majority (73%) of caesarean sections were planned, with surgery durations mostly within one to two hours. Post-operative pain management revealed that 73% of parturients reported a VAS ≤ 2 at the 3rd hour, but 77% experienced a VAS ≥ 4 by the 6th hour. Early oral intake was initiated by 66% of parturients before the 6th hour for liquids and before the 12th hour for light meals. The urinary catheter was removed before the 12th postoperative hour in 56% of cases. Early mobilization was achieved by 67% of parturients before the 12th hour, and 82% were breastfeeding naturally, with 79.7% satisfaction with care. Conclusion: The study highlights the partial implementation of ERAS protocols in post-caesarean recovery, pinpointing areas for improvement, particularly in pain management, early oral intake, and mobilization. A standardized approach to early post-caesarean rehabilitation could significantly enhance maternal and neonatal outcomes, reduce complications, and improve patient satisfaction.

Enhanced recovery after elective spinal surgery: an Australian pilot study.

The principles of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) aim to reduce the physiological stress of surgery which in turn improve clinical and health economic outcomes. There is ample evidence in literature supporting ERAS methodologies in other surgical specialties, but its adoption in spinal surgery, especially in Australia remains in infancy. The aim of this project is to describe the early experience with an evidence-based ERAS pathway for simple spine surgery, a first of its kind in Australia. An ERAS protocol was designed using an evidenced-based review of the literature. The authors then conducted a prospective cohort analysis looking at outcome of patients undergoing elective spinal (lumbar and cervical) decompression surgery under ERAS principles by a single surgeon on the Westmead Hospital Campus between March 2021 to May 2023. Primary outcomes were patient length of stay (LOS), patient reported pain and disability scores and complications (including readmissions within 30 days and re-operation within 6 months). Secondary outcomes included predictors of failure for same-day discharge. A total of 52 patients underwent spinal decompression surgeries under the ERAS protocol. Overall 43 out of 52 patients (83.7%) were successfully discharged on the same day as their surgery. Patient reported outcomes were improved at 6 weeks and 6 months confirming durability of intervention. The rates of complications were similar to literature reported rates for simple lumbar or cervical decompression procedures and there were no readmissions within 30 days or re-operations within 6 months of surgery. Being of non-English speaking background [odds ratio (OR) =6.08, P=0.04] and from home alone (OR =10.25, P=0.03) were predictors of failure of same day discharge in this small cohort. Implementation of ERAS protocols for simple spinal decompression surgeries is feasible and produces durable improved patient outcomes while reducing LOS in hospitals. Patient social factors can be predictive of lack of compliance.

A meta-analysis of the implementation of enhanced recovery after surgery pathways in anterior cervical spine surgery for degenerative cervical spine diseases.

To systematically evaluate the perioperative effects of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol on anterior cervical spine surgery by means of meta-analysis. According to the PRISMA guidelines, the article's search on the China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang data resource system, VIP, PubMed database and Cochrane library was conducted to identify clinical studies investigating the effects of ERAS protocols on anterior cervical spine surgery. A quantitative meta-analysis was performed for the clinical outcomes extracted from the studies that met inclusion criteria. Of the 21 studies identified from the article search, 10 studies met inclusion criteria. The meta-analysis showed shorter length of stay (LOS) (MD = -2.16, 95% CI (-2.57, -1.75), P < 0.00001) and higher patient satisfaction for the ERAS protocols (OR = 3.13, 95% CI (1.97, 4.98), P < 0.00001). Furthermore, ERAS programs led to significant decreases in cost (MD = -0.81, 95% CI (-1.08, -0.53), P < 0.00001) and complication rates (OR = 0.15, 95% CI (0.08, 0.27), P < 0.00001), but no difference in 90-day readmission (OR = 0.63, 95% CI (0.30, 1.35), P = 0.24). The data of this study suggest that the implementation of ERAS protocol decreases LOS, cost and complications rates and improve satisfaction for the patients undergoing anterior cervical spine surgery. To support the practice use of ERAS in anterior cervical spine surgery further, controlled trials will be indispensable.

Comparison of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol versus Conventional Approach for Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: An Interventional Study

Introduction: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is considered the gold standard for benign gallbladder disease due to its minimal invasiveness, reduced bleeding, and rapid recovery. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols, recognised for lowering surgical stress and complications, are increasingly adopted for their postoperative benefits. Aim: To assess and compare postoperative outcomes in laparoscopic cholecystectomy patients undergoing ERAS versus conventional approaches. Materials and Methods: This prospective interventional study was conducted at the Surgery Department of Mahatama Gandhi Medical College and Research Institute, Puducherry, India from January 2021 to June 2022. All patients above 18 years of age undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy with American Soceity of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) I and II were included. A total of 90 subjects, 45 subjects in the Group A (ERAS protocol) and 45 subjects in the Group B (Conventional approach), were included based on computer-generated random numbers with concealment of allocation. Key parameters, including length of hospital stay, morbidity, postoperative pain, and protocol compliance, were evaluated between both groups. Continuous variables were presented as means with standard deviations and analysed using unpaired t-tests. Categorical variables were expressed as percentages and compared using chisquare tests. Results: The mean age of the study population in ERAS and conventional was 41.3±7.9 years and 41.6±9.6 years, respectively. Similarly, 17 male participants were from the ERAS group and 15 were from the conventional group, whereas among female participants 28 were from the ERAS group and 30 were from the conventional group. The ERAS group demonstrated significant advantages: shorter hospital stays (91.2% vs. 73.4%, p=0.0274), lower Grade 1 morbidity (p=0.0213), and reduced postoperative pain (p=0.0001). Conclusion: The ERAS group exhibited notable benefits, including a shorter hospital stay, reduced morbidity, and lower postoperative pain. These findings suggest the potential for enhanced recovery outcomes with ERAS protocol implementation in laparoscopic cholecystectomy patients.

The iterative implementation of a comprehensive enhanced recovery after surgery protocol in all spinal surgery in Korea: a comparative analysis of clinical outcomes and medical costs between primary spinal tumors and degenerative spinal diseases.

Most studies on the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol in spine surgery have focused on patients with degenerative spinal diseases (DSDs), resulting in a lack of evidence for a comprehensive ERAS protocol applicable to patients with primary spine tumors (PSTs) and other spinal diseases. The authors had developed and gradually adopted components of the comprehensive ERAS protocol for all spine surgical procedures from 2003 to 2011, and then the current ERAS protocol was fully implemented in 2012. This study aimed to evaluate the impact and the applicability of the comprehensive ERAS protocol across all spine surgical procedures and to compare outcomes between the PST and DSD groups. Adult spine surgical procedures were conducted from 2003 to 2021 at the Seoul National University Hospital Spine Center and data were retrospectively reviewed. The author divided the study periods into the developing ERAS (2003-2011) and post-current ERAS (2012-2021) periods, and outcomes were compared between the two periods. Surgical procedures for metastatic cancer, infection, and trauma were excluded. Interrupted time series analysis (ITSA) was used to assess the impact of the ERAS protocol on medical costs and clinical outcomes, including length of stay (LOS) and rates of 30-day readmission, reoperation, and surgical site infection (SSI). Subgroup analyses were conducted on the PST and DSD groups in terms of LOS and medical costs. The study included 7143 surgical procedures, comprising 1494 for PSTs, 5340 for DSDs, and 309 for other spinal diseases. After ERAS protocol implementation, spine surgical procedures showed significant reductions in LOS and medical costs by 22% (p = 0.008) and 22% (p < 0.001), respectively. The DSD group demonstrated a 16% (p < 0.001) reduction in LOS, whereas the PST group achieved a 28% (p < 0.001) reduction, noting a more pronounced LOS reduction in PST surgical procedures (p = 0.003). Medical costs decreased by 23% (p < 0.001) in the DSD group and 12% (p = 0.054) in the PST group, with a larger cost reduction for DSD surgical procedures (p = 0.021). No statistically significant differences were found in the rates of 30-day readmission, reoperation, and SSI between the developing and post-current ERAS implementation periods (p = 0.65, p = 0.59, and p = 0.52, respectively). Comprehensive ERAS protocol implementation significantly reduced LOS and medical costs in all spine surgical procedures, while maintaining comparable 30-day readmission, reoperation, and SSI rates. These findings suggest that the ERAS protocol is equally applicable to all spine surgical procedures, with a more pronounced effect on reducing LOS in the PST group and on reducing medical costs in the DSD group.