Implementation Of Duty Hour Restrictions Research Articles

Surgical Skills in General Surgery Residency Program: Current Trends and Future Directions

Today, general surgery residents (GSR) face unorthodox challenges due to variation in caseloads and the implementation of duty hour restrictions. It has been stated that the most concerning change in the education of GSRs was the downward trend in weekly operative cases. The integration of surgical skills labs utilizing human body donors could prove to be beneficial for education. The use of human body donors for anatomy education is not a novel idea, however research needs to be done to better understand pros and cons of different preservation methods for surgical skill training. Traditionally formaldehyde is used as the main preservative however soft‐preservation techniques (such as alcohol and Thiel) and fresh‐frozen methods have been gaining popularity as an educational tool for professional students and surgical residents due to the many lifelike qualities the tissue retains during preservation. Studies using soft preserved donors have investigated skill confidence of GSR which all showed an increase in confidence for surgical skills for all PGY residents. Some of these skills include: surgical airway, tracheoesophageal injuries, thoracotomy‐cardiac injury, solid abdominal organ injury, and more. Integration of human body donors into GSR programs has proven to be advantageous for development of surgical skills and confidence in the capabilities of surgical residents. In an effort to improve anatomy education and surgical skill development for general surgery residents additional research should be done. Future studies need to compare the various educational anatomical models and preservation methods could prove to be advantageous.

Career Satisfaction, Gender Bias, and Work-Life Balance: A Contemporary Assessment of General Surgeons

To identify factors and patterns of career and life satisfaction among general surgery residency graduates who completed all of their general surgery training after the implementation of duty hour restrictions. A 91-point electronic survey was distributed to assess experiences during medical school, residency, current surgical practice and work-life balance. Descriptive statistics and chi-square tests were completed. Twenty-nine ACGME-accredited surgery residencies. Graduates of surgery residencies between 2008 and 2018. Three hundred thirty-six surgeons completed the survey (21% response rate); 42% (n = 141) were female. Seventy-nine percent (n = 81) of female and 92% (n = 138) of male surgeons reported overall career satisfaction (p = 0.004). Overall, 97% and 94% reported feeling competent to practice clinically and operate independently at the conclusion of their training. Thirty-four percent (n = 48) of women experienced gender bias/discrimination while on their medical school surgery rotation, compared to 6% (n = 12) of men (p < 0.001). Sixty-two percent (n = 63) of female surgeons reported gender bias in their practice, compared to 4% (n = 6) of men (p < 0.001). Of respondents with children, female surgeons were more likely to think having a child negatively affected their career advancement (p = 0.004), and 24% of female surgeons and 11% of male surgeons do not think having a family is supported by their practice (p = 0.02). If given the opportunity to choose a career again, 21% of female surgeons and 13% of male surgeons would choose a different profession (p = 0.13). General surgeons who completed their training after implementation of duty hour regulations are confident in their preparation for clinical practice. Female surgeons were less likely to be satisfied with their career and they report significantly more bias during their professional development and career. Work-life balance challenges were similar among men and women. Efforts are necessary to reduce gender bias across the spectrum of general surgeon training/career and to promote well-being among surgeons in practice.

The Effects of 24-Hour Neurosurgical Call on Fine Motor Dexterity, Cognition, and Mood.

Background: Concerns regarding the effects of fatigue on physician performance and quality of life lead to the implementation of duty hour restrictions for residents by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME). These restrictions have been met by strong criticism from the neurosurgical community. This is partly due to a lack of objective evidence that fatigue results in decrements in professional function in neurological surgeons. There is also concern that the restrictions have diminished clinical and operative experience as well as the development of professional responsibility in residency.Objective: To evaluate whether 24-hour neurosurgical call has an objective impact on fine motor dexterity, cognitive thinking skills, and mental well-being.Methods: Subjects were tested before and after taking 24 hours of neurosurgical call. We evaluated fine motor dexterity using the Vienna Test System Motor Performance Series, cognitive thinking abilities using a battery of paper-pencil neuropsychological tests, and mental well-being using the Profile of Mood States. Results: A total of 27 subjects were included in this study, 12 seasoned to neurosurgical call and 15 naive to neurosurgical call. The seasoned subjects demonstrated no statistically significant change in performance after call on any of the tests for fine motor dexterity or cognitive thinking abilities. The nonseasoned subjects demonstrated multiple decrements in fine motor dexterity and cognitive thinking abilities after taking call. In the Motor Performance Series, they had a statistically significant decrease in the speed of untargeted movements in the nondominant hand during the tapping test (p = 0.002), and a decline in the precision of fine motor movements and information processing as evidenced by an increase in the number of errors of the dominant hand in the line tracking test (p = 0.014). There was a statistically significant decline in their immediate memory during Hopkins Verbal Learning Test (p = 0.025), and complex attention, mental flexibility, and visual-motor speed in the Trail Making Test (p = 0.03). The Profile of Mood States found no difference in feelings of anger (p = 0.54), tension (p = 0.358), or depression (p = 0.65). There were increased feelings of confusion (p < 0.001) and decreased feelings of vigor (p < 0.001) and friendliness (p = 0.001). Nonseasoned subjects had an increase in total mood disturbance (p = 0.012) but seasoned subjects did not (p = 0.083). Conclusion: Our results suggest that fatigue-induced decrements in professional function can be ameliorated by experience with prolonged duty hours. In contrast to nonseasoned subjects, those who were conditioned to 24-hour neurosurgical call demonstrated resilience in fine motor dexterity and cognitive thinking skills, and exhibited no change in total mood disturbance. An argument can be made that we are turning the neurosurgical training paradigm upside down with the current ACGME duty hour restrictions.

Impact of Resident Overnight Duty Hour Changes on Obstetrical Outcomes: A Population-Based Cohort Study.

To determine whether obstetrical patient outcomes have changed following the introduction of restricted resident work hours. A population-based retrospective cohort study of the effects of restricted duty hours for residents in July 2013 at three academic hospitals in Toronto, ON using linked health care databases. The study included 6763 deliveries in the 2 years pre-exposure and 5548 deliveries in the 2 years post-exposure. The primary outcome, planned prior to data collection, was a composite index of 29 maternal/fetal outcomes including maternal transfusion/postpartum hemorrhage, maternal infection, fetal mortality, NICU admissions, and surgical/obstetrical complications. There were seven secondary outcomes analysed: NICU admissions; neonatal death; maternal transfusion or postpartum hemorrhage; maternal infection; and three composite measures. A generalized estimating equation model, clustered by institution, was utilized to assess for differences post-intervention. We found no significant differences in baseline demographics between groups. After the implementation of duty hour restrictions, no significant difference was seen in the primary outcome. However, an increased incidence of composite maternal surgical/obstetrical outcomes (OR 1.191; 95% CI 1.037-1.367, P = 0.013) and transfusion/postpartum hemorrhage (OR 1.232; 95% CI 1.074-1.413, P = 0.003) was found. There were no significant differences in other secondary outcomes. Since the implementation of resident duty hour restrictions, there was no overall change in patient outcomes. However, there was an increase in surgical/obstetrical complications and transfusion/postpartum hemorrhage. This suggests that duty hour restrictions may not be beneficial to patient outcomes. It highlights the need to further investigate the clinical impact of a change in resident duty hours.

Reduced Resident Work Hours in Urology: The History and Impact of Duty Hour Restrictions

IntroductionThe ACGME first mandated duty hour restrictions for resident physicians in 2003, setting a limit of 80 hours per week. While the goals of this and later reforms were to improve patient care and safety, the outcomes have been mixed. In this review we report on the history of duty hour regulations and how these changes have impacted resident and patient outcomes. MethodsA literature search was performed, and articles discussing surgical training, resident duty hours, resident wellness and patient outcomes were reviewed. ResultsAfter implementation of duty hour restrictions in 2003, the Harvard Work Hours Health and Safety Group published 3 hallmark studies that suggested duty hour restrictions were associated with improved outcomes. A recently published systematic review reported mixed results from the growing body of research. While 71% of the reviewed studies reported improvement in resident wellness, only 4% illustrated an improvement in resident education, 19% reported improved patient safety outcomes and 13% demonstrated improved patient morbidity. ConclusionsResident duty hour restrictions were based on a body of evidence illustrating that fatigue and sleeplessness negatively impact decision making, resident wellness and patient care. While initial outcomes suggested that these regulations resulted in better resident and patient outcomes, more recent evidence suggests otherwise. There is very little urology specific evidence addressing these matters.

Recruitment of house staff into anesthesiology: a longitudinal evaluation of factors responsible for selecting a career in anesthesiology and an individual training program

Study ObjectiveTo re-evaluate factors responsible for selecting a career in anesthesiology and for selecting an anesthesiology training program. The perceptions of anesthesiology residents about employment opportunities and future job security were also re-examined. Novel data on the impact of duty hour restrictions on residency training were obtained. DesignSurvey instrument. SettingAcademic medical center. Subjects63 residents enrolled in the anesthesiology residency at Mayo Clinic in Rochester, MN (clinical base year and clinical anesthesia years 1-3) during the 2010-11 academic year. All responses were anonymous. MeasurementsCurrent study data were compared to data from two similar studies published by the authors (1995-96 and 2000-01) using an f-exact test. A P-value ≤ 0.05 was considered significant. Main Results55 of 63 (87%) residents responded to the survey. The most frequently cited reasons for selecting a career in anesthesiology were: anesthesiology is a “hands-on” specialty (49%), critical care medicine is included in the scope of training/practice (33%), anesthesiology provides opportunities to perform invasive procedures (31%), and the work is immediately gratifying (31%). When current data were compared with data from the 1995-96 survey, respondents reported significant decreases in interest in physiology/pharmacology (42% vs 21%; P = 0.03), opportunities to conduct research (13% vs 2%; P = 0.05) and opportunities to train in pain medicine (13% vs 0%; P = 0.01) as reasons for selecting anesthesiology. When current data were compared with data from the 2000-2001 survey, respondents reported a significant increase in critical care medicine (7% vs 33%, P = 0.01), significant decreases in time off (36% vs 11%; P = 0.01) and work time mostly devoted to patient care (20% vs 2%; P = 0.01) as factors in selecting anesthesiology as a career. Nearly all (94%) respondents reported a high level of satisfaction with their specialty choice and would choose anesthesiology again if currently graduating medical school. When current data were compared with those from the 2000-2001 survey, a significant increase in respondents who anticipated difficulty securing employment (0% vs 14%; P = 0.01) was noted. However, anticipation of difficulty in securing employment remained significantly lower than what was reported on the 1995-96 survey (54% vs 14%; P = 0.01). Thirty-eight percent of residents reported that implementation of duty hour restrictions had a positive impact on resident education, and 43% of residents reported that duty hour restrictions improved their quality of life. However, most respondents (69%) did not support further duty hour restrictions, and many (43%) expected to work longer hours after graduation. ConclusionsResidents in this study remain highly satisfied with anesthesiology as a career choice and with their training program. However, a resurgence of concern about employment after program completion and about future job security is apparent. The impact of critical care medicine training has significantly increased as a factor in selecting anesthesiology as a career, and the impact of training in pain medicine has significantly decreased. Although work hour restrictions were viewed as having a positive impact on training and well-being by 48% of residents, a majority of respondents in this study (76%) disagreed with further duty hour restrictions.

The ACGME case log: General surgery resident experience in pediatric surgery

BackgroundGeneral surgery (GS) residents in ACGME programs log cases performed during their residency. We reviewed designated pediatric surgery (PS) cases to assess for changes in performed cases over time. MethodsThe ACGME case logs for graduating GS residents were reviewed from academic year (AY) 1989–1990 to 2010–2011 for designated pediatric cases. Overall and designated PS cases were analyzed. Data were combined into five blocks: Period I (AY1989–90 to AY1993–94), Period II (AY1994–95 to AY1998–99), Period III (AY1999–00 to AY2002–03), Period IV (AY2003–04 to AY2006–07), and Period V (AY2007–08 to AY2010–11). Periods IV and V were delineated by implementation of duty hour restrictions. Student t-tests compared averages among the time periods with significance at P < .05. ResultsOverall GS case load remained relatively stable. Of total cases, PS cases accounted for 5.4% in Period I and 3.7% in Period V. Designated pediatric cases declined for each period from an average of 47.7 in Period I to 33.8 in Period V. These changes are due to a decline in hernia repairs, which account for half of cases. All other cases contributed only minimally to the pediatric cases. The only laparoscopic cases in the database were anti-reflux procedures, which increased over time. ConclusionsGS residents perform a diminishing number of designated PS cases. This decline occurred before the onset of work-hour restrictions. These changes have implications on the capabilities of the current graduating workforce. However, the case log does not reflect all cases trainees may be exposed to, so revision of this list is recommended.

Intern Workload and Discontinuity of Care on 30-Day Readmission

Intern Workload and Discontinuity of Care on 30-Day Readmission

Trends in Neurosurgical Complication Rates at Teaching vs Nonteaching Hospitals Following Duty-Hour Restrictions

In 2003 the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education implemented duty-hour restrictions for residents, with an unclear impact on patient care. The authors hypothesize that implementation of duty-hour restrictions is not associated with decreased morbidity for neurosurgical patients. This hypothesis was tested with the Nationwide Inpatient Sample to examine inpatient complications associated with a common elective procedure, craniotomy for meningioma. The Nationwide Inpatient Sample was queried for all patients admitted for elective craniotomy for meningioma from 1998 to 2008, excluding the year 2003. Each case was queried for common in-hospital postoperative complications. The complication rate was compared for 5-year epochs at teaching and nonteaching hospitals before (1998-2002) and after (2004-2008) the adoption of the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education work-hour restriction. Multivariate analysis was performed to control for the effects of age and medical comorbidities. We identified 21177 patients who met inclusion criteria. We identified an effect of age, preexisting medical comorbidity, and timing of surgery on postoperative complication rates. At teaching hospitals, the complication rate increased from 14% to 16% (P < .001). In contrast, this increase was not mirrored at nonteaching hospitals, which saw a nearly constant postoperative complication rate of 15% from 1998 to 2002 and 15% for the years 2004 to 2008 (P = .979). This effect remained significant in a multivariate analysis including age and existing comorbidities as covariates (P = .016). In patients undergoing craniotomy for meningioma, postoperative complication rates increased at teaching hospitals, but not at nonteaching hospitals over the 5-year epochs before and after 2003.

Resident Case Coverage in the Era of the 80-Hour Workweek

The purpose of our study was to evaluate resident case coverage before and after the implementation of duty-hour restrictions and discuss its potential impact on surgical attendings. We reviewed cases before (6/2002 to 6/2003) and after (6/2008 to 6/2009) the implementation of duty-hour restrictions, retrospectively. Academic-affiliated community surgical residency program. Full-time academic faculty and surgical residents. Of 5253 cases performed in the year before the 80-hour workweek, 4466 (85%) were covered by residents and 787 (15%) were uncovered. Of the 6123 cases performed after the 80-hour workweek restrictions, 3694 (60%) were covered by residents and 2429 (40%) were uncovered. Despite an increase in operations and faculty, significantly fewer cases were covered by residents when comparing the time-restricted and non-time-restricted periods (85% vs 60%, p < 0.005). The number of surgical cases without resident participation has increased significantly in the 80-hour workweek. Departments should reevaluate faculty expectations relative to time management, compensation, and nonclinical responsibilities.

“Do One, Teach One” the New Paradigm in General Surgery Residency Training

There is literature examining the total number of procedures performed by surgery residents before and after duty hour restrictions (DHR). There is insufficient literature addressing the effect of DHR on the number of procedures in which residents directly participate as an assistant, rather than as the primary operating surgeon. The operative experience of general surgery residents completing training at the University of Mississippi Medical Center from 2002 to 2008 was retrospectively examined. Data collected included all procedures entered into the General Surgery Operative Log of the American Council on Graduate Medical Education web site in each of the following categories: Surgeon Chief (SC), Surgeon Junior (SJ), Teaching Assistant (TA), and First Assistant (FA). A total of 31 residents completed the program during the study period. Linear regression analysis revealed a significant decrease in the total number of operative procedures (p < 0.05, slope = -55.23, r = -0.99) and the number of procedures reported as FA (p < 0.05, slope = -75, r = -0.89) over the 7-year period. The number of procedures in which residents functioned as the primary surgeon (SJ and SC) or TA remained constant. Since the implementation of DHR at our institution, the number of procedures in which residents participate as a FA has declined. A surgeon is the sum of his or her cumulative operative experience, whether as the operating surgeon or assistant surgeon; one must conclude that the surgical residents' total operative experience at our institution has declined since the inception of the DHR.

Operative Experience in the Era of Duty Hour Restrictions: Is Broad-Based General Surgery Training Coming to an End?

Since the institution of Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) resident work hour restrictions, conflicting evidence exists regarding the impact on resident case volume with most data from single-institution studies. We examined the effect of restrictions on national resident operative experience. After permission from the ACGME, we reviewed the publicly available national resident case log data (1999 through 2008) maintained on the ACGME web site (www.acgme.org), including total major cases with subanalysis of the ACGME-specified categories. The mean cases per resident were compared before (1999 to 2003) and after (2003 to 2008) restrictions. After the implementation of duty hour restrictions, the mean number of total cases per resident significantly decreased (949 +/- 18 vs 911 +/- 14, P = 0.004). Subanalysis showed a significant increase in alimentary tract (217 +/- 7 vs 229 +/- 3, P = 0.004), skin/soft tissue (31 +/- 3 vs 36 +/- 1, P = 0.01), and endocrine (26 +/- 2 vs 31 +/- 2, P = 0.006) cases. However, we observed a significant decrease in head and neck (21 +/- 0.3 vs 20 +/- 0.3, P = 0.01), vascular (164 +/- 29 vs 126 +/- 5, P = 0.01), pediatric (41 +/- 1 vs 37 +/- 2, P = 0.006), genitourinary (10 +/- 2 vs 7 +/- 1, P = 0.004), gynecologic surgery (5 +/- 1 vs 3 +/- 0.6, P = 0.002), plastics (16 +/- 0.3 vs 15 +/- 0.7, P = 0.03), and endoscopy (91 +/- 3 vs 82 +/- 2, P < 0.001) procedures. Analysis of the ACGME-compiled national data confirms that duty hour restrictions have significantly impacted resident operative experience. Importantly, experience in specialty areas, including vascular and endoscopy, appears to have been sacrificed for consolidation of resources into general surgery services as indicated by the increase in alimentary tract and endocrine cases. These findings raise the following question: Is the era of truly broad-based general surgery training coming to an end?

Improvements in Otolaryngology Resident In-Service Scores after Curriculum Interventions

The purpose of our study was to evaluate resident case coverage before and after the implementation of duty-hour restrictions and discuss its potential impact on surgical attendings.We reviewed cases before (6/2002 to 6/2003) and after (6/2008 to 6/2009) the implementation of duty-hour restrictions, retrospectively.Academic-affiliated community surgical residency program.Full-time academic faculty and surgical residents.Of 5253 cases performed in the year before the 80-hour workweek, 4466 (85%) were covered by residents and 787 (15%) were uncovered. Of the 6123 cases performed after the 80-hour workweek restrictions, 3694 (60%) were covered by residents and 2429 (40%) were uncovered. Despite an increase in operations and faculty, significantly fewer cases were covered by residents when comparing the time-restricted and non–time-restricted periods (85% vs 60%, p < 0.005).The number of surgical cases without resident participation has increased significantly in the 80-hour workweek. Departments should reevaluate faculty expectations relative to time management, compensation, and nonclinical responsibilities.