Implementation Of Collaborative Care Model Research Articles

Collaborative Care for Depression and Anxiety: Racial-Ethnic Differences in Treatment Engagement and Outcomes.

This study aimed to examine racial-ethnic differences in engagement with and clinical outcomes of a collaborative care model (CoCM) implemented in primary care outpatient clinics in an urban academic medical center. Adult patients (N=4,911) who screened positive for symptoms of depression, anxiety, or both on the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 or the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 scale and who identified as non-Hispanic Black, Hispanic, or non-Hispanic White were offered participation in a CoCM implementation. The primary outcome was treatment engagement, defined as receipt of any follow-up visit, minimally adequate 4-week follow-up (at least one visit), and minimally adequate 16-week follow-up (at least three visits) after initial assessment. Secondary outcomes were response and remission of depression or anxiety. After adjustment of analyses for sociodemographic covariates, Black and Hispanic participants were significantly less likely than White participants to have received any or minimally adequate follow-up. Black and Hispanic participants who received any or minimally adequate 16-week follow-up were more likely than White participants to demonstrate depression symptom response and remission of anxiety symptoms. This CoCM implementation appears to have been effective in treating depression and anxiety among Black and Hispanic patients. However, significant disparities in receipt of follow-up care were observed. Efforts must be made to improve the retention of patients from racial-ethnic minority groups in collaborative care.

Associations Between Implementation of the Collaborative Care Model and Disparities in Perinatal Depression Care.

To evaluate whether perinatal collaborative care model implementation was associated with a reduction in racial disparities in depression care. This retrospective cohort study included pregnant and postpartum people who self-identified as either Black or White, and received prenatal care at academic faculty offices affiliated with an urban quaternary medical center. Individuals were divided into two cohorts to reflect the epochs of implementation. The primary outcome was the frequency of depression screening. The secondary outcome was the frequency of provision of a treatment recommendation for those with a positive depression screen. Antenatal and postpartum care were analyzed separately. A propensity score was used in multivariable models to control for confounders chosen a priori across implementation epoch. Interaction terms were created between race and implementation epoch to identify whether effect modification was present. Subgroup analyses were performed for outcomes with significant race-by-epoch interaction terms. Of the 4,710 individuals included in these analyses, 4,135 (87.8%) self-identified as White and 575 (12.2%) self-identified as Black. Before implementation, Black individuals were more likely to receive screening (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.44) but less likely to have a treatment recommended when a positive screen was identified (aOR 0.05). In multivariable models, race-by-epoch interaction terms were significant for both antenatal screening (P<.001) and antenatal treatment recommendation (P=.045), demonstrating that implementation of the perinatal collaborative care model was associated with reductions in extant racial disparities. After implementation, there were no significant differences by race (referent=White) in screening for antenatal depression (aOR 1.22, 95% CI 0.89-1.68) or treatment recommendations for those who screened positive (aOR 0.64, 95% CI 0.27-1.53). Race-by-epoch interaction terms were not significant in multivariable models for either postpartum screening or treatment recommendation. Implementation of the perinatal collaborative care model is associated with a mitigation of racial disparities in antenatal depression care and may be an equity-promoting intervention for maternal health.

Association of psychiatric consultant characteristics with clinical outcomes of collaborative care for depression.

Context: Adult depression treatment in primary care is improved by integrated behavioral health such as the Collaborative Care Model (CoCM) but outcomes vary across health centers. Objective: Identify CoCM team factors associated with variation in clinical outcomes. Study Design: Correlative study of survey with linked clinical data from routine care. Setting or Dataset: Primary care health centers in Washington state participating in two CoCM implementation and sustainment initiatives (MHIP and BHIP). Clinical data from the Care Management Tracking System (CMTS) used as part of routine clinical care in all sites. Population studied: CoCM clinical teams and adults diagnosed with depression and receiving care from 31 distinct clinic sites throughout Washington state. Instrument: A survey for CoCM Care Managers was developed based on qualitative work exploring CoCM team function in eight domains: overall team function (OTF), psychiatric consultant (PsyC), relationship with primary care physicians (RPCP), role in the practice (RP), training experience (TE), thoughts on CoCM (TOC), leadership support (LS), and overall experience with CoCM (EXP). Outcome Measures: Depression symptoms (PHQ-9) measured as part of regular clinical care. Clinically significant improvements were defined as ≥50% improvement, last PHQ-9 measured <10, and a last PHQ-9 measured <5 (remission). Results: Data from 59 Care Manager surveys and 2509 patients from 31 clinics showed psychometric evidence for the 8 survey domains. Unadjusted multilevel mixed-effects logistic regression found the PsyC domain was associated (p<0.05) with >50% change in PHQ-9 (OR=1.32, p=0.046), last PHQ-9 <10 (OR=1.34, p=0.009), and last PHQ-9 <5 (OR=1.25, p=0.029). Adjusting simultaneously for both clinic-level and patient-level variables, the PsyC domain was significantly associated with likelihood of patient remission (last PHQ-9 <5; OR=1.22, p=0.031). Conclusions: An instrument to assess perceived functioning of the CoCM team had psychometric support. Perceived characteristics of psychiatric consultants was associated with likelihood of depression remission. Characteristics included interest in teaching, commitment to the site, making efforts to have weekly meetings, and willingness to assist care managers on adjustment of treatment strategies. This study is the first to quantify variation in CoCM team functioning with patient outcomes and can be used to inform training and the use of the CoCM.

Implementing Collaborative Care in Low-Resource Government, Research, and Academic Settings in Rural Nepal.

The collaborative care model (CoCM) is a strategy of integrating behavioral health into primary care to expand access to high-quality mental health services in areas with few psychiatrists. CoCM is multifaceted, and its implementation is accelerating in high-resource settings. However, in low-resource settings, it may not be feasible to implement all CoCM components. Guidance is lacking on CoCM implementation when only some of its components are feasible. In this column, the authors used a cost-benefit approach to refine strategies for addressing common implementation challenges, incorporating the authors' experiences in what was gained and what was lost at each implementation step in three CoCM programs in diverse clinical settings in rural Nepal.

Collaborative Care Model Promotes Justice and Equity

Collaborative Care Model Promotes Justice and Equity

The effect of collaborative care model training on diabetic foot ulcer patients' quality of life: a semi-experimental study.

The aim of this semi-experimental study was the determination of collaborative care model training on diabetic foot ulcer patients' quality of life. Demographic characteristics and life's quality questionnaires were used, and to implement the collaborative model that included (including four steps of motivation, preparation, engagement, and evaluation), 60 patients divided into two "experiment" and "control" groups. For the experimental group, the program was done by face to face education and pamphlet through one hour in seven sessions. Data were analyzed by descriptive and inferential statistical methods. SPSS 24 was used for data analysis. Findings showed the differences of the scores of life's quality dimensions (except the economic situation), which was significant between both groups after the implementation of the collaborative care model (p < 0.001). The implementation of collaborative care model can be effective to improve diabetic foot ulcer patients' quality of life.

Comparative effectiveness of external vs blended facilitation on collaborative care model implementation in slow-implementer community practices.

To evaluate the comparative effectiveness of external facilitation (EF) vs external+internal facilitation (EF/IF), on uptake of a collaborative chronic care model (CCM) in community practices that were slower to implement under low-level implementation support. Primary data were collected from 43 community practices in Michigan and Colorado at baseline and for 12months following randomization. Sites that failed to meet a pre-established implementation benchmark after six months of low-level implementation support were randomized to add either EF or EF/IF support for up to 12months. Key outcomes were change in number of patients receiving the CCM and number of patients receiving a clinically significant dose of the CCM. Moderators' analyses further examined whether comparative effectiveness was dependent on prerandomization adoption, number of providers trained or practice size. Facilitation log data were used for exploratory follow-up analyses. Sites reported monthly on number of patients that had received the CCM. Facilitation logs were completed by study EF and site IFs and shared with the study team. N=21 sites were randomized to EF and 22 to EF/IF. Overall, EF/IF practices saw more uptake than EF sites after 12months (ΔEF/IF-EF =4.4 patients, 95% CI=1.87-6.87). Moderators' analyses, however, revealed that it was only sites with no prerandomization uptake of the CCM (nonadopter sites) that saw significantly more benefit from EF/IF (ΔEF/IF-EF =9.2 patients, 95% CI: 5.72, 12.63). For sites with prerandomization uptake (adopter sites), EF/IF offered no additional benefit (ΔEF/IF-EF =-0.9; 95% CI: -4.40, 2.60). Number of providers trained and practice size were not significant moderators. Although stepping up to the more intensive EF/IF did outperform EF overall, its benefit was limited to sites that failed to deliver any CCM under the low-level strategy. Once one or more providers were delivering the CCM, additional on-site personnel did not appear to add value to the implementation effort.

Challenges of adopting the role of care manager when implementing the collaborative care model for people with common mental illnesses: A scoping review.

This review aimed to identify the main factors influencing the adoption of the role of care manager (CM) by nurses when implementing the collaborative care model (CCM) for common mental illnesses in primary care settings. A total of 19 studies met the inclusion criteria, reporting on 14 distinct interventions implemented between 2000 and 2017 in five countries. Two categories of factors were identified and described as follows: (i) strategies for the CCM implementation (e.g. initial care management training and supervision by a mental health specialist) and (ii) context-specific factors (e.g. organizational factors, collaboration with team members, nurses' care management competency). Identified implementation strategies were mainly aimed towards improving the nurse's care management competency, but their efficacy in developing the set of competencies needed to fulfil a CM role was not well demonstrated. There is a need to better understand the relationship between the nurses' competencies, the care management activities, the strategies used to implement the CCM and the context-specific factors. Strategies to optimize the adoption of the CM role should not be solely oriented towards the individual's competency in care management, but also consider other context-specific factors. The CM also needs a favourable context in order to perform his or her activities with competency.

Unpacking Collaborative Care for Depression: Examining Two Essential Tasks for Implementation.

This study examined how two key process-of-care tasks of the collaborative care model (CCM) predict patient depression outcomes. Registry data were from a large implementation of the CCM in Washington State and included 5,439 patient-episodes for patients age 18 or older with a baseline Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) score of ≥10 and at least one follow-up contact with the CCM care manager within 24 weeks of initial contact. Key CCM tasks examined were at least one care manager follow-up contact within four weeks of initial contact and at least one psychiatric consultation between weeks 8 and 12 for patients not responding to treatment by week 8. Clinically significant improvement in depression symptoms was defined as achieving a PHQ-9 score of <10 or a 50% or more reduction in PHQ-9 score compared with baseline. Bivariate and multivariate (logistic and proportional hazard models) analyses were conducted to examine how fidelity with either task predicted outcomes. All analyses were conducted with the original sample and with a propensity score-matched sample. Four-week follow-up was associated with a greater likelihood of achieving improvement in depression (odds ratio [OR]=1.63, 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.23-2.17) and a shorter time to improvement (hazard ratio=2.06, CI=1.67-2.54). Psychiatric consultation was also associated with a greater likelihood of improvement (OR=1.44, CI=1.13-1.84) but not with a shorter time to improvement. Propensity score-matched analysis yielded very similar results. Findings support efforts to improve fidelity to the two process-of-care tasks and to include these tasks among quality measures for CCM implementation.