Implantable Cardioverter-defibrillator For Secondary Prevention Research Articles

Abstract 4120434: A Rare Case Of Localized Ventricular Tachycardia Due To Mitral Annular Disjunction And a Subvalvular Aneurysm

Introduction: Mitral annular disjunction (MAD) is an abnormality of the mitral valve where a portion of the mitral annulus and valve leaflets insert into the left atrium away from the fibrous annulus. Since its identification in 1981 its diagnosis has increased due to the advancements in cardiac imaging. It’s association with ventricular arrythmia (VA) and sudden cardiac death (SCD) underscores the importance of its identification. We present a case of ventricular tachycardia (VT) that is attributed to MAD with associated sub-mitral valve left ventricular aneurysm (SMA) formation. Case: A 51-year-old African American male with history of posterior papillary muscle premature ventricular contractions (PVC), PVC induced cardiomyopathy, and family history of sudden cardiac death in his mother who presented to the emergency department due to palpitations. Electrocardiogram (ECG) showed sustained monomorphic VT at a rate of 160 bpm. This converted to normal sinus rhythm with intravenous amiodarone and metoprolol. Further work up included cardiac magnetic resonance which identified a 4 x 1.8 x 1.4 cm SMA on the basal inferior and inferolateral walls. There was near transmural late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) of the aneurysm and an associated 7 mm of MAD with posterior mitral valve prolapse (MVP). He underwent left heart catheterization which was normal. ECG showed a superior right axis with associated right bundle branch block which correlated to a basal inferolateral exit and to the location of the SMA. Ultimately the patient underwent implantation of secondary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillator and initiation of sotalol. Discussion: The prevalence of MAD is approximately 30% in those with MVP and 8% in the general population. Those patients with MAD and MVP appear to be at higher risk for VA and SCD. The most likely mechanism for this association is the fibrotic changes that occur in the basal inferolateral left ventricle because of mechanical stretch on the papillary muscles by the prolapsing leaflets. The scar and aneurysm that develop can serve as substrate for reentrant VA. Treatment for this involves surgical repair of the mitral valve annulus and correction of the MAD distance which has been shown to improve arrythmia. Conclusion: This case illustrates an important but poorly understood arrhythmogenic entity that will increase in incidence as cardiac imaging advances. Its implications in VA and SCD warrant further research.

Implantable cardioverter defibrillators among elderly survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

Abstract Background Survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) with a shockable rhythm are at increased risk of cardiac arrest, and clinical practice guidelines recommend placement of an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) in the absence of a reversible cause and an expected meaningful survival of at least one year. Contemporary data on the prevalence of secondary prevention ICD placement among OHCA survivors remain limited. Purpose Examine patterns of secondary prevention ICD implantation in survivors of OHCA due to a shockable rhythm in a large national registry. Methods Using 2013-2019 data from the Cardiac Arrest Registry to Enhance Survival (CARES) linked to Medicare files, we identified 3,226 patients aged >65 years who survived to discharge following OHCA due to an initial shockable rhythm from January 1, 2013 to December 31, 2019. Patients with severe neurological disability, prior history of cancer, and those discharged to hospice were excluded. We calculated cumulative prevalence of ICD implantation at discharge, 90 days, and 6 months post cardiac arrest. Multivariable hierarchical regression models with random hospital effects were used to determine the adjusted association of patient characteristics with ICD implantation and quantify the extent of variation in ICD implantation across sites, using a median odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). Results Patients’ mean age was 72.2 years; 23.5% were women, 10% were Black and 4% Hispanic. Among 3,226 OHCA patients, 997 (30.9%) received an ICD before discharge; 1,266 (39.2%) received an ICD within 90 days of cardiac arrest, and 1,287 (39.9%) received an ICD by 6 months. After adjusting for differences in demographics and co-morbidities, the odds of receiving an ICD at discharge were significantly lower in patients aged 85 years and older, women, patients with prior history of stroke or diabetes, patients who presented with acute myocardial infarction (P<0.05 for all). There was no significant difference in ICD implantation by race and ethnicity (P=0.94) (Table 1). Even after adjusting for patient demographics, co-morbidities, and presentation with acute myocardial infarction, there was large variation in hospital rate of ICD implantation at discharge, with a median odds ratio of 1.65 (95% CI 1.41-1.86). Conclusion Fewer than 1 in 3 patients with OHCA due to a shockable rhythm are discharged with a secondary prevention ICD. Although implantation of ICD was associated with patient variables, there was no difference in ICD implantation by race and ethnicity. There was large variation across hospitals in ICD implantation even after adjusting for patient variables highlighting an opportunity for improving post-arrest management of cardiac arrest survivors.

Motor vehicle crash risk after cardioverter-defibrillator implantation: a population-based cohort study

BackgroundLimited empirical evidence informs driving restrictions after implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation. We sought to evaluate real-world motor vehicle crash risks after ICD implantation.MethodsWe performed a retrospective cohort study using 22...

Incidence and risk factors for first and recurrent ICD shock therapy in patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator.

Advances in medical treatment and outcomes in implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) recipients incentivize a need for improved candidate selection and identification of risk factors for ICD therapy. We examined contemporary rates of and risk factors for ICD therapy. Patients with ICD for primary (PP) or secondary prevention (SP), implanted between January 2010 and December 2020, were followed for appropriate and inappropriate incident and recurrent shock. Overall, 2998 patients (mean age 61.8 ± 12.7years, 20% female, 73% ICD carriers, and 47.1% SP) were analyzed with a median follow-up of 4.3 (interquartile range (IQR) 2.1-7.4) years. A total of 426/2998 (14.2%) patients had shock; 364/2998 (12.1%) had appropriate and 82/2998 (2.7%) inappropriate shock, with annualized event rates of 2.34 (2.11-2.59) and 0.49 (0.39-0.61) per 100 person-years, respectively. Of those with shock, 133/364 (36.5%) experienced recurrent appropriate shock and 8/364 (2.2%) received recurrent inappropriate shock, with event rates of 10.57 (8.85-12.53) and 0.46 (0.20-0.92), respectively. In multivariable analyses, female sex was associated with a reduced risk of incident appropriate shock (hazard ratio 0.69 [95% confidence interval 0.52; 0.91]). Of other variables, only revascularization status was associated with recurrent appropriate shock in PP, and CRT-D with recurrent appropriate shock in the overall cohort. One in eight ICD recipients received appropriate shock 2-7years after guideline-directed implantation. More than one-third of patients with a first shock experienced recurrent shock. Few clinical variables showed potential in predicting shocks, illustrating a need for more advanced tools to select candidates for implantation.

Arrhythmic prognosis according to left ventricular systolic dysfunction severity in cardiac sarcoidosis

BackgroundCurrent guidelines present varying classes of recommendations for implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) utilization in patients with cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <50%. ObjectiveThe purpose of this study was to investigate the ventricular arrhythmia risk in CS patients with ICDs and varying degrees of left ventricular systolic dysfunction. MethodsThe study included CS patients with an ICD and LVEF <50% at index evaluation. The primary outcome was survival free of sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT)/ventricular fibrillation (VF) after ICD implantation and was assessed comparatively for LVEF ≤35% vs 36%–49% and for primary vs secondary prevention ICD indication. ResultsThe study included 61 patients (median age 57 years; 61% male) with LVEF 36%–49% (n = 23) or LVEF ≤35% (n = 38). An ICD was implanted for secondary prevention in 24% and 44% of the LVEF ≤35% and 36%–49% groups, respectively (P = .11). The primary outcome did not differ between the 2 groups in univariable analysis (LVEF ≤35% vs 36%–49%: hazard ratio [HR] 0.85; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.39–1.82; P = .67). In multivariable analysis, secondary prevention ICD indication was the only significant predictor of incident sustained VT/VF (HR 2.86; 95% CI 1.23–6.67; P = .015). Mean sustained VT/VF event burden was higher in the secondary compared with the primary prevention ICD patients (0.47 vs 0.11 events per patient-year; P = .005) but did not differ significantly between LVEF ≤35% and 36%–49% patients. ConclusionCS patients with ICD indications and LVEF 36%–49% carry similarly high arrhythmic risk as those with LVEF ≤35%. Patients with secondary prevention ICDs have the highest overall risk.

Rate of Appropriate and Inappropriate Therapy in Patients with Non-Ischaemic Cardiomyopathy—A Comparison Between Primary and Secondary Prevention Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Patients

Rate of Appropriate and Inappropriate Therapy in Patients with Non-Ischaemic Cardiomyopathy—A Comparison Between Primary and Secondary Prevention Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Patients

Disparities in the implantation of secondary prevention implantable cardioverter defibrillator in the United States.

The annual incidence of sudden cardiac death is over 300,000 in the United States (US). Historically, inpatient implantation of secondary prevention implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) has been variable and subject to healthcare disparities. To evaluate contemporary practice trends of inpatient secondary prevention ICD implants within the US on the basis of race, sex, and socioeconomic status (SES). The study is a retrospective analysis of the National Inpatient Sample from 2016 to 2020 of adult discharges with a primary diagnosis of ventricular tachycardia (VT), ventricular flutter, and fibrillation (VF). Adjusted ICD implantation rates based on race, sex, and SES and associated temporal trends were calculated using multivariate regression. A total of 193,600 primary VT/VF discharges in the NIS were included in the cohort, of which 57,895 (29.9%) had ICD placement. There was a significant racial and ethnic disparity in ICD placement for Black, Hispanic, Asian, and Native American patients as compared to White patients; adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 0.86 [p<.01], 0.90 [p = .03], 0.81[p<.01], 0.45 [p<.01], respectively. Female patients were also less likely to receive an ICD compared to male patients (aOR: 0.75, p<.01). Disparities in ICD placement remained stable over the study period (ptrend ≥.05 in all races, both sexes and income categories). Racial, sex, and SES disparities persisted for secondary prevention ICD implants in the US. An investigation into contributing factors and subsequent approaches are needed to address the modifiable causes of disparities in ICD implantation as these trends have not improved compared to historic data.

Aerobic Exercise Improves Heart Rate Variability After an Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (ICD).

Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT00522340.

Sex differences in hospitalization for ventricular arrhythmia after a first myocardial infarction in patients without indication for implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation

Abstract Background Ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) represent a serious complication of myocardial infarction (MI). Incidence rate of VAs and sudden cardiac death is commonly reported to be lower in women than in men after MI (1,2). While data regarding SCD and VAs after MI in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) are well described, data regarding the incidence of readmissions for VA in patients without ICD implantation criteria after a first MI are scarce, as well as the impact of sex on their occurrence. Objective This study aims to investigate the impact of sex on VA occurrences in post-MI patients without ICD implantation criteria. Methods This study was conducted using the French national health data system using electronic codes for procedures (CCAM) and hospitalizations data (PMSI). The study population consisted of patients discharged after a first MI and without criteria for ICD implantation. Results Between January 2014 and January 2015, 137,736 patients were hospitalized in France with a diagnosis of first MI and were followed using CCAM and PMSI codes. Among the 112,465 alive at discharge, 6838 patients were excluded due to criteria for the implantation of an ICD for primary or secondary prevention. Of the remaining 105,629 patients, 1600 (1.51%) were rehospitalized for VA with a median delay of 505 days (IQR 110-1208). Men had almost twice the risk of VA than women after initial discharge for MI (OR 1.88, 95% CI 1.65-2.14; p&amp;lt;0.0001). Among the 72,103 men included, 1240 (1.72%) were rehospitalized for VA with a median delay of 514 days (IQR 107-1212). Factors independently associated with VA in men were previous atrial fibrillation (OR 1.91, 95% CI 1.66 - 2.21, p&amp;lt;0.0001), previous vascular disease (OR 1.28, 95% CI 1.10 - 1.50, p=0.002), absence of coronary angioplasty (OR 1.28, 95% CI 1.10 - 1.50, p=0.002), previous diabetes (OR 1.19, 95% CI 1.04 - 1.36, p=0.012), previous hypertension (OR 1.19, 95% CI 1.05 - 1.34, p=0.007), previous or in-hospital congestive heart failure (OR 1.47, 95% CI 1.03-2.08, p=0.032 and OR 1.65, 95% CI 1.32-2.07, p&amp;lt;0.0001), and age (patients between 60 and 79 yo being at the higher risk of VA compared to &amp;lt;60 and &amp;gt;80yo patients, p=0.002 and &amp;lt;0.0001 respectively). Among the 33,526 women included, 360 (1.07%) were rehospitalized for VA with a median (IQR) delay of 461 days (116-1159) after MI. Factors independently associated with VA were previous atrial fibrillation (OR 1.68, 95% CI 1.30 - 2.18, p&amp;lt;0.0001), previous vascular disease (OR 1.37, 95% CI 1.01 - 1.84, p=0.041), and age (patients between 60 and 79 yo being at the higher risk of VA compared to &amp;gt;80yo patients, p=0.001). Conclusion The risk of readmission for VAs after a first MI is significantly lower in women compared to men, with distinct predictive factors. These findings suggest that sex-specific VA risk stratification and management strategies may be warranted after an initial MI.Sexe influence on post-MI VAs occurence

Safety, efficacy, and reliability evaluation ofa novel small-diameter defibrillation lead: Global LEADR pivotal trial results

BackgroundImplantable cardioverter-defibrillators last longer, and interest in reliable leads with targeted lead placement is growing. The OmniaSecure defibrillation lead is a novel, small-diameter, catheter-delivered lead designed for targeted placement, based on the established SelectSecure SureScan MRI Model 3830 lumenless pacing lead platform. ObjectiveThis trial assessed safety and efficacy of the OmniaSecure defibrillation lead. MethodsThe worldwide LEADR pivotal clinical trial enrolled patients indicated for de novo implantation of a primary or secondary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillator or cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator, all of whom received the study lead. The primary efficacy end point was successful defibrillation at implantation per protocol. The primary safety end point was freedom from study lead–related major complications at 6 months. The primary efficacy and safety objectives were met if the lower bound of the 2-sided 95% credible interval was >88% and >90%, respectively. ResultsIn total, 643 patients successfully received the study lead, and 505 patients have completed 12-month follow-up. The lead was placed in the desired right ventricular location in 99.5% of patients. Defibrillation testing at implantation was completed in 119 patients, with success in 97.5%. The Kaplan-Meier estimated freedom from study lead–related major complications was 97.1% at 6 and 12 months. The trial exceeded the primary efficacy and safety objective thresholds. There were zero study lead fractures and electrical performance was stable throughout the mean follow-up of 12.7 ± 4.8 months (mean ± SD). ConclusionThe OmniaSecure lead exceeded prespecified primary end point performance goals for safety and efficacy, demonstrating high defibrillation success and a low occurrence of lead-related major complications with zero lead fractures.

Sex Differences in Outcomes of Patients with an Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator for the Secondary Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death.

Background: In patients with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) for secondary prevention, sex differences may exist in clinical outcomes. We sought to investigate sex differences in appropriate ICD therapy, appropriate and inappropriate shock, and all-cause mortality in this patient population. Methods: A total of 257 patients who received an ICD for a secondary prevention indication in the University Medical Centre Groningen (UMCG) between 1 January 2012 and 31 December 2018 were retrospectively included in a consecutive manner. Appropriate ICD therapy, comprising shock and antitachycardia pacing (ATP) for ventricular fibrillation (VF) or ventricular tachycardia (VT), was the primary outcome. Results: The patient population included 257 patients, of whom 45 (18%) were women and 212 (82%) were men. The median of the age was 64 (interquartile range (IQR) 53-72) years. During follow-up (median duration 6.2 (IQR 4.8-7.8) years), first appropriate device therapy took place in 10 (22%) patients for women and 85 (40%) patients for men. Female sex was negatively associated with the rate of appropriate ICD therapy, univariably (hazard ratio (HR) 0.48 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.25-0.93]; p = 0.030) and multivariably (HR 0.44 [95% CI 0.20-0.95]; p = 0.036). Conclusions: Women with secondary prevention ICDs were less likely than men to receive appropriate ICD therapy.

Multicenter prospective observational study to clarify the current status and clinical outcome in Japanese patients who have an indication for implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) or wearable cardioverter defibrillator (WCD) (TRANSITION JAPAN‐ICD/WCD study): Rationale and design of a prospective, multicenter, observational, comparative study

AbstractBackgroundDespite the positive impact of implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) and wearable cardioverter defibrillators (WCDs) on prognosis, their implantation is often withheld especially in Japanese heart failure patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (HFrEF) who have not experienced ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF) for uncertain reasons. Recent advancements in heart failure (HF) medications have significantly improved the prognosis for HFrEF. Given this context, a critical reassessment of the treatment and prognosis of ICDs and WCDs is essential, as it has the potential to reshape awareness and treatment strategies for these patients.MethodsWe are initiating a prospective multicenter observational study for HFrEF patients eligible for ICD in primary and secondary prevention, and WCD, regardless of device use, including all consenting patients. Study subjects are to be enrolled from 31 participant hospitals located throughout Japan from April 1, 2023, to December 31, 2024, and each will be followed up for 1 year or more. The planned sample size is 651 cases. The primary endpoint is the rate of cardiac implantable electronic device implementation. Other endpoints include the incidence of VT/VF and sudden death, all‐cause mortality, and HF hospitalization, other events. We will collect clinical background information plus each patient's symptoms, Clinical Frailty Scale score, laboratory test results, echocardiographic and electrocardiographic parameters, and serial changes will also be secondary endpoints.ResultsNot applicable.ConclusionThis study offers invaluable insights into understanding the role of ICD/WCD in Japanese HF patients in the new era of HF medication.

Distinguishing Primary Prevention From Secondary Prevention Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators Using Administrative Health and Cardiac Device Registry Data

BackgroundAdministrative health data and cardiac device registries can be used to empirically evaluate outcomes and costs after implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) implantation. These datasets often have incomplete information on the indication for implantation (primary vs secondary prevention of sudden cardiac death). MethodsWe used 16 years of population-based cardiac device registry and administrative health data from British Columbia, Canada, to derive and internally validate statistical models that predict the likely indication for ICD implantation. We used chart review data as the reference standard for ICD indication in the Cardiac Device Registry database (CDR; 2004-2012 [Cardiac Services BC]) and nonmissing indication as the reference standard in the Heart Information System registry database (HEARTis; 2013-2019 [Cardiac Services BC]). We created 3 logistic regression prediction models in each database: one using only registry data, one using only administrative data, and one using both registry and administrative data. We assessed the predictive performance of each model using standard metrics after optimism correction with 200 bootstrap resamples. ResultsModels that used registry data alone demonstrated excellent predictive performance (sensitivity ≥ 89%; specificity ≥ 87%). Models that used only administrative data performed well (sensitivity ≥ 84%; specificity ≥ 70%). Models that used both registry and administrative data showed modest gains over those that used registry data alone (sensitivity ≥ 90%; specificity ≥ 89%). ConclusionsAdministrative health data and cardiac device registry data can distinguish secondary prevention ICDs from primary prevention ICDs with acceptable sensitivity and specificity. Imputation of missing ICD indication might make these data resources more useful for research and health system monitoring.

Expanded application of wearable cardioverter defibrillators beyond current guidelines: proposal for a European register explained through single clinical scenarios

The wearable cardioverter defibrillator (WCD) is becoming a more and more widely used instrument for the prevention of sudden cardiac death of patients either with a secondary prevention implantable cardioverter...

Hybrid Magnetic Resonance Positron Emission Tomography Is Associated With Cardiac-Related Outcomes in Cardiac Sarcoidosis

BackgroundImaging with late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) magnetic resonance (MR) and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) PET allows complementary assessment of myocardial injury and disease activity and has shown promise for improved characterization of active cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) based on the combined positive imaging outcome, MR(+)PET(+). ObjectivesThis study aims to evaluate qualitative and quantitative assessments of hybrid MR/PET imaging in CS and to evaluate its association with cardiac-related outcomes. MethodsA total of 148 patients with suspected CS underwent hybrid MR/PET imaging. Patients were classified based on the presence/absence of LGE (MR+/MR−), presence/absence of 18F-FDG (PET+/PET−), and pattern of 18F-FDG uptake (focal/diffuse) into the following categories: MR(+)PET(+)FOCAL, MR(+)PET(+)DIFFUSE, MR(+)PET(−), MR(−)PET(+)FOCAL, MR(−)PET(+)DIFFUSE, MR(−)PET(−). Further analysis classified MR positivity based on %LGE exceeding 5.7% as MR(+/−)5.7%. Quantitative values of standard uptake value, target-to-background ratio, target-to-normal-myocardium ratio (TNMRmax), and T2 were measured. The primary clinical endpoint was met by the occurrence of cardiac arrest, ventricular tachycardia, or secondary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) before the end of the study. The secondary endpoint was met by any of the primary endpoint criteria plus heart failure or heart block. MR/PET imaging results were compared between those meeting or not meeting the clinical endpoints. ResultsPatients designated MR(+)5.7%PET(+)FOCAL had increased odds of meeting the primary clinical endpoint compared to those with all other imaging classifications (unadjusted OR: 9.2 [95% CI: 3.0-28.7]; P = 0.0001), which was higher than the odds based on MR or PET alone. TNMRmax achieved an area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve of 0.90 for separating MR(+)PET(+)FOCAL from non-MR(+)PET(+)FOCAL, and 0.77 for separating those reaching the clinical endpoint from those not reaching the clinical endpoint. ConclusionsHybrid MR/PET image–based classification of CS was statistically associated with clinical outcomes in CS. TNMRmax had modest sensitivity and specificity for quantifying the imaging-based classification MR(+)PET(+)FOCAL and was associated with outcomes. Use of combined MR and PET image–based classification may have use in prognostication and treatment management in CS.

Risk of Atrial Fibrillation and Adverse Outcomes in Patients With Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices.

Comprehensive epidemiological data are lacking on the incident atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs). This study aimed to examine the incidence, risk factors, and AF-related adverse outcomes of patients with CIEDs. This was an observational cohort study that analyzed patients without prevalent AF who underwent CIED implantation in 2009-2018 using a Korean nationwide claims database. The subjects were divided into three groups by CIED type and indication: pacemaker (n=21,438), implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD)/cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) with heart failure (HF) (n=3,450), and ICD for secondary prevention without HF (n=2,146). The incidence of AF, AF-associated predictors, and adverse outcomes were evaluated. During follow-up, the incidence of AF was 4.3, 7.3, and 5.1 per 100 person-years in the pacemaker, ICD/CRT with HF, and ICD without HF cohorts, respectively. Across the three cohorts, older age and valvular heart disease were commonly associated with incident AF. Incident AF was consistently associated with an increased risk of ischemic stroke (3.8-11.4-fold), admission for HF (2.6-10.5-fold), hospitalization for any cause (2.4-2.7-fold), all-cause death (4.1-5.0-fold), and composite outcomes (3.4-5.7-fold). Oral anticoagulation rates were suboptimal in patients with incident AF (pacemaker, 51.3%; ICD/CRT with HF, 51.7%; and ICD without HF, 33.8%, respectively). A substantial proportion of patients implanted CIED developed newly diagnosed AF. Incident AF was associated with a higher risk of adverse events. The importance of awareness, early detection, and appropriate management of AF in patients with CIED should be emphasized.

Sex-Related Differences in Ventricular Tachyarrhythmia Events in Patients With Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator and Prior Ventricular Tachyarrhythmias

BackgroundData on the risk of ventricular tachycardia (VT), ventricular fibrillation (VF), and death by sex in patients with prior VT/VF are limited. ObjectivesThis study aimed to assess sex-related differences in implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD)-treated VT/VF events and death in patients implanted for secondary prevention or primary prevention ICD indications who experienced VT/VF before enrollment in the RAID (Ranolazine Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator) trial. MethodsSex-related differences in the first and recurrent VT/VF requiring antitachycardia pacing or ICD shock and death were evaluated in 714 patients. ResultsThere were 124 women (17%) and 590 men observed during a mean follow-up of 26.81 ± 14.52 months. Compared to men, women were at a significantly lower risk of VT/VF/death (HR: 0.67; P = 0.029), VT/VF (HR: 0.68; P = 0.049), VT/VF treated with antitachycardia pacing (HR: 0.59; P = 0.019), and VT/VF treated with ICD shock (HR: 0.54; P = 0.035). The risk of recurrent VT/VF was also significantly lower in women (HR: 0.35; P < 0.001). HR for death was similar to the other endpoints (HR: 0.61; P = 0.162). In comparison to men, women presented with faster VT rates (196 ± 32 beats/min vs 177 ± 30 beats/min, respectively; P = 0.002), and faster shock-requiring VT/VF rates (258 ± 56 beats/min vs 227 ± 57 beats/min, respectively; P = 0.30). There was a significant interaction for the risk of VT/VF by race (P = 0.013) with White women having significantly lower risk than White men (HR: 0.36; P < 0.001), whereas Black women had a similar risk to Black men (HR: 1.06; P = 0.851). ConclusionsWomen with a history of prior VT/VF experienced a lower risk recurrent VT/VF requiring ICD therapy when compared to men. Black Women had a risk similar to men, whereas the lower risk for VT/VF in women was observed primarily in White women. (Ranolazine Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Trial; NCT01215253)

N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide for prediction of ventricular arrhythmias: data from the SMASH Study

Abstract Background Elevated N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) concentrations predict heart failure (HF) and mortality, but whether NT-proBNP predicts ventricular arrhythmias (VA) is not clear. Purpose We hypothesize that high NT-proBNP concentrations associate with the risk of incident VA, defined as adjudicated ventricular fibrillation or sustained ventricular tachycardia. Methods In a prospective, observational study of patients treated with implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD), we analyzed NT-proBNP concentrations at baseline and after mean 1.4 years in association to incident VA. Results We included 491 patients (age 66±12 years, 83% men) out of whom 51% had a primary prevention ICD indication. The median NT-proBNP concentration was 567 (25-75 percentile 203-1480) ng/L, and patients with higher concentrations were older with more HF and ICD for primary prevention. During mean 3.1±0.7 years, 136 patients (28%) had ≥1 VA. Baseline NT-proBNP concentrations were associated with risk of incident VA (HR 1.39 [95%CI 1.22-1.58], p&amp;lt;0.001) (Figure1), HF hospitalizations (HR 3.38 [95%CI 2.69-4.25], p&amp;lt;0.001) and all-cause mortality (HR 2.49 [2.05-3.04], p&amp;lt;0.001) (Figure2), which persisted after adjusting for age, sex, BMI, CAD, HF, renal function, and LVEF. The association with VA was stronger in secondary vs primary prevention ICD indication: HR 1.59 (95% CI 1.34-1.88 C-statistics 0.71) vs HR 1.25 (1.02-1.52, C-statistics 0.55), p-for-interaction=0.06. Changes in NT-proBNP during the first 1.4 years did not associate with subsequent VA. Conclusions NT-proBNP concentrations are associated with the risk of incident VA after adjustment for established risk factors, with the strongest association in patients with a secondary prevention ICD indication.

Neurohormonal status is associated with long-term appropriate implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy for life-threatening ventricular arrhythmia

Abstract Background Neurohormonal status is associated with the risk of life-threatening ventricular arrhythmia. Purpose We aimed to assess whether neurohormonal status in patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) is correlated with the risk of long-term appropriate shock or overdrive delivered by the ICD for life-threatening arrhythmia. Methods A total of 331 clinically stable patients with ICD without any past history of shock or overdrive for life-threatening ventricular arrhythmia were enrolled in a two-center prospective cohort and followed up for a median time of 7.9 years. At enrolment, patients’ medical history, treatment, clinical and imaging data were recorded and, blood and, blood samples were drawn for the assessment of standard biological parameters as well as 3 neurohormones (aldosterone, A type NT-pro-Atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) and MR-pro-Adrenomedullin (ADM). The primary endpoint of the study was the occurrence of appropriate shock or overdrive delivered by the ICD (ICD therapy). A multivariable cox model adjusted on age, gender, primary or secondary prevention ICD as well as all baseline variables unequally distributed between groups with or without ICD therapy was used for the assessment of the relationship between the 3 neurohormones and the primary endpoint. Results The population consisted of patients with a mean age of 60±15 years, among which 59(18%) women and 160(48%) with a secondary prevention indication for ICD. At baseline all data were similar between patients with or without ICD therapy with the exception of weight, systolic blood pressure, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and serum potassium and creatinine levels. No other variable, including MADIT and SHOCKED score were significantly associated with the risk of ICD therapy. Death was recorded in 114(34%) patients and a total of 78(24%), 76(23%) and 106(33%) patients had appropriate shock, overdrive and ICD therapy respectively during the follow-up. On multivariable analysis, highest levels of ANP and lowest levels of ADM but not aldosterone were independently associated with life-threatening ventricular arrhythmia requiring ICD therapy (table). Other correlates of ICD therapy were lower LVEF and, higher weight, serum potassium and creatinine concentrations. ANP and ADM had a stepwise additive impact on the risk of ICD therapy. (Figure 1) Conclusions In a stable all comer population with ICD and no history of ICD therapy, blood levels of neurohormones ANP and ADM are associated with the risk of life-threatening ventricular arrhythmia requiring ICD-delivered shock or overdrive independent of other correlates. ANP and ADM concentrations may be useful in identifying patients at high risk of such arrhythmia and who may most benefit from ICD implantation.

Long-term follow-up in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy after defibrillator implantation: analysis of appropriate and inappropriate therapy

Abstract Background Treatment with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD) is effective for prevention of sudden cardiac death (SCD) in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). Assessment of SCD risk and identification of patients most likely to benefit from primary prevention ICD is challenging. Purpose To investigate the long-term incidence of appropriate and inappropriate ICD therapy in patients with HCM. Methods This was a retrospective cohort study including all patients with HCM and ICDs implanted between 1995 to 2022 in our region (population 2.6 million). Both patients treated with primary and secondary prevention ICD were included. Data was retrieved from medical records. Patients with an ICD implanted for primary prevention were stratified into risk groups according to European Society of Cardiology HCM Risk-SCD score. Results We included 187 patients (65% male) with HCM and ICDs implanted for primary (80%) or secondary (20%) prevention. The median age at ICD implantation was 50 years (IQR: 40 to 61 years). During a mean follow-up of 9 years (IQR: 4 to 12 years), 53 patients (28%) experienced appropriate ICD therapy (antitachycardia pacing and/or shock), while 17 (9%) patients received inappropriate therapy. Patients with an ICD as secondary prevention were almost twice as likely to receive appropriate ICD therapy compared to patients with a primary prevention ICD (42% vs. 25%, p=0.04). The proportion of patients receiving appropriate shocks was 7 times higher in patients with an HCM Risk-SCD score ≥6% compared to patients with a risk score &amp;lt;4% (29% vs. 4%, p&amp;lt;0.001). There was no significant difference in the proportion of appropriate shocks between patients with a HCM Risk-SCD score ≥6% and patients with a risk score of 4%-6% (29% vs. 21%, p=0.49). (Figure 1). Conclusion One in four patients with HCM treated with an ICD experienced appropriate device intervention during 9 years of follow up. Patients with an HCM Risk-SCD score ≥6% had a 7-fold higher risk of appropriate ICD therapy compared to patients with an HCM Risk-SCD score &amp;lt;4%. There was no significant difference in the risk of appropriate shock therapy between patients with a risk score ≥6% and patients with a risk score of 4%-6%. The findings indicate the need for improved selection of patient with HCM for implantation of ICD’s.