Purpose: Hemiarthroplasty with polyvinyl alcohol hydrogel (PVA) cartilage implants in the treatment of hallux rigidus showed initial promise with a 90% success rate. However, recent studies suggest that the implant may shrink and subside, leading to higher than anticipated failure rates. The purpose of this study was to characterize the healing response to polyvinyl implantation by using an ovine model. Methods: An osteochondral defect was created unilaterally in the medial femoral condyle of six sheep and filled with a PVA implant (Cartiva, Wright Medical) (n=4) or left empty (n=2). Sheep were followed for six months. Post-mortem quantitative CT (qCT) evaluations were performed to measure bone density using 5mm-wide ROI delineated in 3D reconstruction around the defect/implant area. Joints were then dissected and evaluated using a modified International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) macroscopic score (I=best, IV=worst). Osteochondral sections were assessed using a modified Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OARSI) histopathology net score (0=best, 20=worst). Synovial membrane histology was scored using the aseptic lymphocyte-dominated vasculitis-associated lesions (ALVAL) scoring system for soft tissue reaction (0=best, 19=worst). Both the synovial membrane and osteochondral sections underwent immunohistochemistry with anti-ionized calcium-binding adapter molecule 1 antibody (Iba1) to identify macrophages. Results: Two of four sheep with the PVA implant showed unrelenting pain and lameness necessitating early euthanasia. These were considered failed implants. qCT scans revealed 2-fold more osteolysis around failed implants than the other two (successful) implants or empty defects (Figure 1A). Grossly, failed implant sheep had ICRS scores of III and IV/V. The two successful implant sheep had ICRS scores of II/V and both empty defect sheep had scores of III/V. Osteochondral histology of failed implants had a mean OARSI score of 13/20 with extensive GAG loss and a stromal inflammatory reaction surrounding the implant that was up to 5-fold wider than successful implants (Figure 1B). This reaction contained abundant fibrovascular tissue with aggregates of lymphocytes and plasma cells. Failed implants revealed strong and diffuse Iba1 staining of macrophages along the implant/bone interface with cells densely packed in multiple rows (Figure 1C). Multinucleated giant cells and macrophages were identified surrounding presumptive implant debris in one failed implant (Figure 1C, red arrow and X). Successful implants and empty defects had few Iba1 positive cells randomly distributed (Figure 1C). Mean synovial membrane ALVAL score for failed implants was 11/19 with presence of an adverse local tissue reaction with lymphocytes and macrophages, vascular reactivity, and synovial hyperplasia (Figure 1D, E). In contrast, synovial membrane in successful implants and empty defects were normal (ALVAL 0/19). Conclusions: Polyvinyl alcohol hydrogel implants had a 50% early failure rate with uncontrollable pain, severe osteolysis, inflammation and an adverse local tissue reaction. Furthermore, the recruitment of macrophages and multinucleated giant cells are evidence of a foreign body reaction typically associated with implant wear debris. Non-degradable biomaterials such as PVA will result in continuous infiltration by macrophages and secretion of proinflammatory cytokines, leading to periprosthetic osteolysis and ultimately implant failure. These Results suggest that the use of this PVA implant should not be continued in human patients without further in vivo safety studies.
Read full abstract