Implant-based Immediate Breast Reconstruction Research Articles

Abstract PO3-22-12: Clinical feasibility of nipple sparing mastectomy (NSM) followed by immediate reconstruction based on direct-to-implant technique

Abstract [Background] The development of NSM approach combined with immediate implant-based breast reconstruction (IBBR) for patients with earlystage breast cancer (BC) preserve the natural skin envelope including nipple-areolar complex (NAC) to able to immediately reconstruct the breast with a permanent implant and simultaneously omit the skin expansion with a tissue expander. We retrospectively analyzed the clinical results of NSM+IBBR and compared the complication rate, outcome of patients who underwent immediate (one-stage) or delayed (two-stage) IBBR followed by standard TM or NSM. [Patients and Results] A total of 108 patients who underwent a TM that included SSM or NSM followed by one- or two-stage IBBR between January 2013 and April 2022. 53 patients underwent a total mastectomy (TM) and 32 patients underwent an NSM followed by two-stage IBBR, and 24 patients underwent an NSM followed by one-stage IBBR. The operation times were 236, 247.2, and 321 min, and the mean surgical bleeding was 60.4, 88.8, and 138 ml, respectively. The complications in the three groups included infection (2.7%, 11.1%, and 6.3%), seroma/hematoma (0%, 5.6%, and 6.3%), flap necrosis (2.7%, 11.1%, and 12.5%), and loss of tissue expander or implant (2.7%, 5.6%, and 6.3%), respectively. At the median 62-month follow-up after the NSM + IBBR, one patient was diagnosed with distant lymph node metastases at the 24-month follow-up and one patient had new primary breast cancer within the reconstructed breast at the 38-month follow-up. But no loco-regional recurrence at the NAC or other distant recurrence were detected in the patients undergone regardless TM or NSM + one-stage or two-stage IBBR. [Summary] Our results suggested that the use of one-stage IBRR tended to increase the operating time and the amount of bleeding compared to two-stage IBRR and the complication rate might be higher in cases in which an NSM is followed by IBBR. Oncological outcome was consistent with the studies showing that loco-regional recurrence is less likely at the NAC regardless of whether the patients underwent one-stage or two-stage IBBR following an NSM. Citation Format: Uhi Toh, Yuko Takao, Yuriko Katagiri, Rie Sugihara, Hidetaka Watanabe. Clinical feasibility of nipple sparing mastectomy (NSM) followed by immediate reconstruction based on direct-to-implant technique [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO3-22-12.

Ten-year trend analysis of breast cancer, oncoplastic, and reconstructive breast surgery in a single institution (2010-2019), what has not changed?

There has been a UK national directive to ensure that patients are offered reconstructive surgical options. We aimed to assess any change in oncoplastic practice over a 10-year period. The surgical management of 7019 breast cancers was retrospectively assessed at Nightingale Breast Centre, Manchester University UK, from 2010 to 2019. The procedures were categorised into breast conservative surgery (BCS) and mastectomy ± immediate reconstruction. The data were analysed using inclusion and exclusion criteria. The overall rates of BCS and mastectomy were 60.1% and 39.9% respectively. No statistically significant change in the overall rates of BCS or mastectomy was observed over the last decade (p = 0.08). The rate of simple wide local excision (WLE) decreased from 98.7% to 89.3% (p < 0.001), whilst the rate of therapeutic mammoplasty (TM) increased from 1.3% to 8% (p < 0.01). The rate of chest wall perforator flaps (CWPF) changed from zero to account for 2.7% of all BCS by 2019. The overall rate of immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) did not significantly change over the study period, but it consistently remained above the national average of 27%. The rate of implant-based IBR increased from 61.3% to 76.5% (p = 0.012), whilst the rate of Latissimus Dorsi (LD) reconstruction decreased from 26.7% to 5.1% (p < 0.05). Additionally, the rate of nipple-sparing mastectomy significantly increased from 5.2% to 24%. No significant changes in the overall rates of BCS was observed, the rates of advanced breast conservation techniques, nipple-sparing mastectomy, and implant-based IBR all have increased, whilst the use of LD reconstruction decreased.

Neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy is safe and feasible for breast conserving surgery or immediate reconstruction

This study aimed to evaluate the survival outcomes of neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy (NARCT) for early breast cancer. Female patients ≤ 80 years old with unilateral T1-T4 invasive ductal breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and radiation therapy (RT) between 2006 and 2015 were enrolled from SEER database. Baseline differences in clinical and pathological characteristics were evaluated using chi-square test. The survival outcomes were estimated by Kaplan–Meier analysis and compared using Cox hazards models. The effects of baseline differences on survival outcome in patients treated with neoadjuvant radiation therapy (NART) and post-operation radiation therapy (PORT) were circumvented by propensity score matching (PSM). Altogether 14,151 patients receiving NAC and RT were enrolled, among whom 386 underwent NART. Based on a 1:4 PSM cohort, NART was an independent unfavorable prognostic factor for breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) and overall survival (OS) for the whole cohort. However, among patients receiving breast conserving surgery (BCS) (HR 1.029, P = 0.915 for BCSS; HR 1.003, P = 0.990 for OS) or implant-based immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) (HR 1.039, P = 0.921 for BCSS; HR 1.153, P = 0.697 for OS), those treated with NART had similar survival outcomes compared with patients treated with PORT. In conclusion, NARCT was a safe and feasible approach for patients undergoing BCS and IBR.

Serratus Anterior Fascia for Immediate Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: A Case Series of 65 Patients With Breast Cancer.

After immediate implant-based breast reconstruction (IIBR) after mastectomy, implant exposure or capsular contracture can occur. This study aimed to evaluate IIBR using serratus anterior fascia in patients with breast cancer. This retrospective case series study enrolled patients with breast cancer underwent IIBR using the serratus anterior fascia after mastectomy in the Department of Breast Surgery of Fujian Cancer Hospital between January 2021 and December 2022. Sixty-five cases with breast cancer underwent IIBR using serratus anterior fascia were enrolled, with a median age of 39 years (range, 24-57 years) and body mass index of 21.32 kg/m 2 (range, 19-25 kg/m 2 ). The aesthetic outcomes of the reconstructed breasts showed good in 53 cases (81.6%), moderate in 11 cases (16.9%), and poor in 1 case (1.5%) due to offset position. Two cases showed poor wound healing, which improved after repeat suturing and 5 cases developed partial ischemic necrosis of the nipple, which scabbed and healed spontaneously. Implant-based breast reconstruction using serratus anterior fascia may provide good aesthetic outcomes with few complications.

Radiotherapy dosimetry and radiotherapy related complications of immediate implant-based reconstruction after breast cancer surgery.

The impact of immediate implant-based breast reconstruction (IBBR) on the delivery of radiotherapy plans remains controversial. This study aimed to compare the differences in radiotherapy dosimetry, complications of radiotherapy, and quality of life in patients who underwent modified radical mastectomy combined with or without IBBR. We retrospectively collected 104 patients with breast cancer who underwent intensity-modulated radiation therapy after modified radical mastectomy with IBBR (n =46) or not (n =58) from January 2017 to December 2021. The dosimetric differences in radiotherapy of planning target volume (PTV) and organs at risk and the differences in complications of radiotherapy between the two groups were compared. We also applied the functional assessment of cancer therapy-breast cancer (FACT-B) score to compare the difference in quality of life. The chi-square test and independent samples t-test were used to analyze the above data. IBBR group was associated with higher PTV volumes, PTV D98, V95, and lower PTV Dmean, D2 compared with the non-reconstruction group (P<0.05). IBBR group also had lower radiotherapy dosimetric parameters in the ipsilateral lung and the heart of left breast cancer patients. The differences in the rates of radiation pneumonia (RP) and radiation dermatitis (RD) between the two groups were not statistically significant (P > 0.05). Moreover, FACT-B scores at 6 months after radiotherapy in patients with IBBR were higher than those without reconstruction (P < 0.05). Patients with IBBR achieved better radiation dosimetry distribution and higher quality of life without more complications of radiotherapy.

Preservation of the pectoralis major fascia has no impact on the long-term oncologic outcomes of patients with breast cancer treated with conservative mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction: A propensity score matching analysis

The oncologic safety of preserving the pectoralis major fascia (PMF) in patients with breast cancer remains controversial. In this study, we aimed to determine the impact of preserving the PMF on long-term oncologic outcomes in patients with breast cancer treated with immediate implant-based breast reconstruction (IBBR) following conservative mastectomy. We selected women with early-stage breast cancer who underwent conservative mastectomy and submuscular IBBR in our center during 2014-2019. The propensity score matching method was used to create well-balanced fascia-preserved and fascia-removed groups. Locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRFS), disease-free survival (DFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and overall survival (OS) rates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using log-rank tests between the fascia-preserved and fascia-removed groups. After matching, there were 219 patients in each group. The mean follow-up time was 64.8±18.1 months for the fascia-preserved group and 64.9±18.4 months for the fascia-removed group. There were no significant differences between the groups in terms of LRFS (91.3% vs. 93.8%; p=0.818), DMFS (94.0% vs. 92.3%; p=0.056), DFS (89.9% vs. 88.4%; p=0.261), and OS (95.8% vs. 95.4%; p=0.783) rates. In the fascia-preserved group, 61.5% of the locoregional recurrence events occurred within 2 years after surgery. Preservation of the PMF did not significantly impact the long-term oncologic outcomes in patients with breast cancer who underwent conservative mastectomy and IBBR. The PMF might be safely preserved in patients without suspicious tumor invasion into this fascia.

Meta-Analysis of Immediate Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction Versus Autologous Breast Reconstruction in the Setting of PMRT.

It is still a controversial debate that which type of immediate breast reconstruction should be operated on breast cancer patients in the setting of postmastectomy radiotherapy. This meta-analysis compared incidence of complications requiring reoperation (CRR), reconstruction failure (RF) and patient-reported outcome between immediate autologous breast reconstruction (ABR) and immediate implant-based breast reconstruction (IBBR), tissue expander/implant reconstruction mostly, in the setting of postmastectomy radiotherapy. Systematic and thorough research was conducted to search for studies published before August 1, 2022, by using three online databases. Studies that covered complications or reconstruction failure between two cohorts were included. To evaluate the possible bias in the included studies, the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was applied. Eight studies presenting 1261 patients were enrolled. The relative risk associated with reconstructive failure favored IBBR (RR = 8.61; 95% CI, 2.84-26.08; P = 0.0001). While the risk for complications requiring reoperation was not significantly different between two groups, either include reconstruction failure (RR = 1.45 95% CI, 0.82-2.55; P = 0.20) or not (RR = 0.63 95% CI, 0.28-1.43; P = 0.27). However, because statistical definitions and methodologies vary, the synthesized result should be taken critically. Patients with IBBR have more possibility experiencing RF compared that with ABR, while the chance for CRR is not that different between two groups. For the purpose of clinical practice refinement, more high-quality studies are needed. This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these evidence-based medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Sentinel lymph node biopsy and immediate two-stage implant-based breast reconstruction: A propensity score-matched analysis

BackgroundThere are important differences between patients requiring sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) and those who do not require axillary surgery at the time of breast reconstruction. We aimed to perform a propensity score-matched analysis to evaluate the impact of SLNB at the time of immediate implant-based breast reconstruction (IBBR) with tissue expanders compared with IBBR alone. MethodsConsecutive female patients undergoing total mastectomy and immediate two-stage IBBR between January 2011 and May 2021 were included. A 1:1 nearest-neighbor matching method without replacement was implemented with a caliper width of 0.01. Patients were matched for age, diabetes, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, premastectomy radiotherapy, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, the plane of prosthesis placement, mastectomy specimen weight, number of drains, and radiation of the expander. ResultsWe included 320 two-stage immediate IBBRs after propensity score matching, 160 reconstructions per group. Relevant surgical variables were comparable between groups. A higher rate of 30-day seroma formation was reported in immediate reconstructions that had SLNB at the time of mastectomy compared with reconstructions that did not have axillary surgery (16.3% versus 8.1%, p = 0.039). The time to complete outpatient expansions and time for expander-to-implant exchange were comparable between patients who underwent IBBRs with SLNB and those who did not. ConclusionSLNB performed at the time of mastectomy and IBBR with tissue expander increased the risk of seroma formation compared with reconstructions that did not have axillary surgery. The rate of infection, hematoma, and unplanned procedures to manage complications did not differ between groups.

Initial experiences and usefulness of porcine acellular dermal matrix-assisted prepectoral breast implant surgery: a case series and systematic review

Background We report our experiences with prepectoral placement breast implant surgery using Supporix (HansBioMed), a porcine acellular dermal matrix (PADM), for cosmetic and reconstructive indications. The clinical efficiency, safety, and cost-effectiveness of PADM were also discussed.Methods A single-center, retrospective study was designed from December 2017 to December 2019. The participants were Korean women who underwent PADM-assisted prepectoral breast implant surgery performed by two surgeons. All complications were registered and analyzed. A systematic review and meta-analysis of complication rates after PADM-assisted prepectoral breast implant surgery were conducted for comparison with other studies. A subgroup analysis was performed according to the operation type: the cosmetic breast surgery (CBS) group, the immediate implant-based breast reconstruction (IIBR) group, and the delayed implant-based breast reconstruction (DIBR) group.Results Twenty breasts in 16 patients were included in our study (median follow-up period, 8.25 months). In a systematic review, 20 publications with a total of 2,504 breasts in 1,921 women were quantitively analyzed. The overall complication rates in our study and other studies were 14% and 24% in the total group analysis, 0% and 12% in the CBS group, 62% and 26% in the IIBR group, and 0% and 28% in the DIBR group, respectively.Conclusions Our data support the effectiveness of PADM-assisted prepectoral breast implant surgery, which was comparable to other studies. PADM was effective for reducing seroma and hematoma in the revision CBS group and the DIBR group. In the IIBR group, it was helpful in preventing implant loss and explantation.

Same Day Discharge After Mastectomy and Immediate Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: A Retrospective Cohort Comparison Using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database.

Currently, overnight admission after immediate implant-based breast reconstruction (IBR) is the standard of care. Our study aims to analyze the safety, feasibility, and outcomes of immediate IBR with same-day discharge as compared with the standard overnight stay. The 2015-2020 National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was reviewed to identify all patients undergoing mastectomy with immediate IBR for malignant breast disease. Patients were stratified into study (patients discharged day of surgery) and control (patients admitted after surgery) groups. Patient demographics, comorbidities, surgical characteristics, implant type, wound complications, readmission, and reoperation rates were collected and analyzed. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression was used to determine independent predictors of same-day discharge versus admission. In addition, Pearson χ2 test was used for comparison of proportions and t test was used for continuous variables unless distributions required subsequent nonparametric analyses. Statistical significance was defined as a P value less than 0.05. A total of 21,923 cases were identified. The study group included 1361 patients discharged same day and the control group included 20,562 patient s admitted for average of 1.4 days (range, 1-86). Average age was 51 years for both groups. Average body mass index for the study group 27 and 28 kg/m2 for the control group, respectively. Total wound complication rates were similar (4.5% study, 4.3% control, P = 0.72). Reoperation rates were lower with same-day discharge (5.7% study, 6.8% control, P = 0.105), though not statistically significant. However, same-day discharge patients had a significantly lower readmission rate compared with the control (2.3% study, 4.2% control, P = 0.001). National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data analysis over a 6-year period reveals that immediate IBR with same-day discharge is associated with a significantly lower readmission rate when compared with the standard overnight stay. The comparable complication profiles show that immediate IBR with same-day discharge is safe, potentially benefiting both patients and hospitals.

Evaluation of Perioperative Versus Extended Courses of Antibiotic Prophylaxis After Immediate Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction.

Immediate implant-based breast reconstruction (IIBR) is the most commonly used method in breast reconstruction in the United States. However, postoperative surgical site infections (SSIs) can cause devastating reconstructive failure. This study evaluates the use of perioperative versus extended courses of antibiotic prophylaxis after IIBR for the prevention of SSI. This is a single-institution retrospective study of patients who underwent IIBR between June 2018 and April 2020. Detailed demographic and clinical information was collected. Patients were divided into subgroups based on antibiotic prophylaxis regimen: group 1 consisted of patients who received 24 hours of perioperative antibiotics and group 2 consisted of patients who received ≥7 days of antibiotics. Statistical analyses were conducted using SPSSv26.0 with P ≤ 0.05 considered statistically significant. A total of 169 patients (285 breasts) who underwent IIBR were included. The mean age was 52.4 ± 10.2 years, and the mean body mass index (BMI) was 26.8 ± 5.7 kg/m2. Twenty-five percent of patients (25.6%) underwent nipple-sparing mastectomy, 69.1% skin-sparing mastectomy, and 5.3% total mastectomy. The implant was placed in the prepectoral, subpectoral, and dual planes in 16.7%, 19.2%, and 64.1% cases, respectively. Acellular dermal matrix was used in 78.7% of cases. A total of 42.0% of patients received 24-hour prophylaxis (group 1), and 58.0% of patients received extended prophylaxis (group 2). Twenty-five infections (14.8%) were identified, of which 9 (5.3%) resulted in reconstructive failure. In bivariate analyses, no significant difference was found between groups in rates of infection (P = 0.273), reconstructive failure (P = 0.653), and seroma (P = 0.125). There was a difference in hematoma rates between groups (P = 0.046). Interestingly, in patients who received only perioperative antibiotics, infection rates were significantly higher in those with BMI ≥ 25 (25.6% vs 7.1%, P = 0.050). There was no difference in overweight patients who received extended antibiotics (16.4% vs 7.0%, P = 0.160). Our data demonstrate no statistical difference in infection rates between perioperative and extended antibiotics. This suggests that the efficacies of current prophylaxis regimens are largely similar, with choice of regimen based on surgeon preference and patient-specific considerations. Infection rates in patients who received perioperative prophylaxis and were overweight were significantly higher, suggesting that BMI should be taken into consideration when choosing a prophylaxis regimen.

Revision Incidence after Immediate Direct-to-Implant versus Two-Stage Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction Using National Real-World Data.

In immediate implant-based breast reconstruction (IBBR), large variation is observed in current practices between a direct-to-implant and a two-stage approach (insertion of a breast implant after a tissue expander). This population-based study aimed to compare unplanned short- and long-term revision incidence between direct-to-implant and two-stage IBBR in The Netherlands. All patients who underwent immediate IBBR following a mastectomy between 2015 and 2019 were selected from the nationwide Dutch Breast Implant Registry. Short- and long-term unplanned revision incidences were studied per immediate IBBR, including revision indications and the total number of additional operations. Confounding by indication was limited using propensity score matching. A total of 4512 breast implants (3948 women) were included, of which 2100 (47%) were for direct-to-implant IBBR and 2412 (53%) were for two-stage IBBR. Median (IQR) follow-up was 29 months (range, 16 to 45 months) and 33 months (range, 21 to 47 months), respectively. Short-term revision incidence was 4.0% and 11.7%, respectively (conditional OR, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.23 to 0.42%). Long-term revision incidence was 10.6% (95% CI, 9.2 to 12.1%) and 16.4% (95% CI, 14.8 to 17.9%), respectively. In the propensity score-matched cohort, similar results were found. In the direct-to-implant group, more breasts were reconstructed within the planned number of operations than in the two-stage group. Unplanned revision surgery occurred less often after direct-to-implant IBBR, and more breasts were reconstructed within the planned number of operations compared to two-stage IBBR. These results, based on real-world data, are important for improving patient counseling and shared decision-making. Risk, II.

Immediate Breast Reconstruction Using the Autologous Dermal Flap

IntroductionDespite the development of breast-conserving surgery in breast cancer treatment, there still remain indications for total mastectomy. Since mastectomy has a significant negative impact on the patients’ quality of life, breast reconstruction is increasingly popular. However, for patients with large ptotic breasts who do not choose tissue-based reconstruction techniques and prefer implant-based breast reconstruction, there is no single-stage breast reconstruction technique other than the classic technique using Acellular Dermal Matrix (ADM). MethodsThis study presents a novel technique for Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy (NSM) and Immediate Breast reconstruction (IBR) in 11 operations (in seven patients) whose treatment decision-making was based on NCCN guidelines. In this technique, the implant/tissue expander is covered by the pectoral muscle in the upper part and an autologous dermal flap in the lower part, replacing an ADM. The dermal flap is created from the de-epithelialized lower mastectomy flap in these large ptotic breasts. Maintaining the nipple-areola complex (NAC) is possible by re-implanting a free nipple split-thickness graft from the NAC of the ipsilateral breast prepared at the beginning of the operation. ResultsAll seven patients had large ptotic breasts ranging from C cup to double D in size and grade 2 and higher breast ptosis. The mean BMI of the patients was 28 (range: 26-33). No major complications occurred postoperatively. There were three minor complications, all managed conservatively. Surgical indications were risk reduction surgery in three patients with BRCA mutations and therapeutic in the remaining patients (three multifocal invasive ductal carcinomas and one diffused ductal carcinoma in situ). None of the patients had a previous reduction mammoplasty as preparation for NSM, and all the patients underwent a single operation. No breast tissue remained under the NAC, which is ideal with the NSM technique. ConclusionsThe proposed technique is excellent for implant-based IBR in patients with large ptotic breasts. It eliminates the use of ADM mesh and reduces the cost and postoperative complication rate associated with ADM. Furthermore, using a free nipple graft technique can eliminate the need for a preparatory mastopexy. This technique can also theoretically reduce the risk of recurrence or new primary breast cancer as there are no remaining ducts beneath the nipple-areola complex.

Dosimetric evaluation of VMAT and helical tomotherapy techniques comparing conventional volumes with clinical target volumes based on new ESTRO ACROP post-mastectomy with immediate implant reconstruction contouring guidelines

BackgroundThe ESTRO-ACROP Consensus Guideline (EACG) recommends implant excluded clinical target volume (CTVp) definitions for post-mastectomy radiation therapy after implant-based immediate breast reconstruction (IBR). The purpose of this study is to investigate the effectiveness of Helical Tomotherapy (HTp) and Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMATp) treatment techniques in terms of CTVp coverage and reduced organ at risk (OAR), normal tissue and implant doses when CTVp was used for treatment planning as the target structure instead of conventional CTV.MethodsEight left-sided and eight right-sided breast cancer patients who underwent IBR after mastectomy were included in this study. Planning CT data sets were acquired during free breathing and patients were treated with HT technique targeted to conventional CTV. Retrospectively, CTVp was delineated based on EACG by the same radiation oncologist, and treatment plans with HTp and VMATp techniques were generated based on CTVp. For each patient, relevant dosimetric parameters were obtained from three different treatment plans.ResultsThere was no statistically significant difference on target coverage in terms of, PTVp-D95, PTVp-Vpres, homogeneity index (p > 0.05) between HTp and VMATp plans. But, the conformity numbers were significantly higher (HTp vs VMATp, 0.69 ± 0.15 vs 0.79 ± 0.12) for VMATp (Z = − 2.17, p = 0.030). While HTp significantly lowered Dmax and Dmean for LAD (LAD-Dmax: χ2 = 12.25, p = 0.002 and LAD-Dmean: χ2 = 12.30, p = 0.002), neither HTp nor VMATp could reduce maximum and mean dose to heart (p > 0.05). Furthermore, heart volume receiving 5 Gy was significantly higher for VMATp when compared to HTp (21.2 ± 9.8 vs 42.7 ± 24.8, p: 0.004). Both techniques succeeded in reducing the mean dose to implant (HTp vs HT, p < 0.001; VMATp vs HT, p < 0.001; VMATp vs HTp, p = 0.005).ConclusionBoth HTp and VMATp techniques succeeded to obtain conformal and homogeneous dose distributions within CTVp while reducing the mean implant dose. HTp was found to be superior to VMATp with regards to lowering all OAR doses except for CB.

Capsular inflammation after immediate breast reconstruction – Gene expression patterns and inflammatory cell infiltration in irradiated and non-irradiated breasts

Capsular contracture following post-mastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) is commonly seen in patients undergoing implant-based immediate breast reconstruction (IBR). Further understanding of the underlying biology is needed for the development of preventive or therapeutic strategies. Therefore, we conducted a comparative study of gene expression patterns in capsular tissue from breast cancer patients who had received versus those who had not received PMRT after implant-based IBR. Biopsies from irradiated and healthy non-irradiated capsular tissue were harvested during implant exchange following IBR. Biopsies from irradiated (n=13) and non-irradiated (n=12) capsules were compared using Affymetrix microarrays to identify the most differentially regulated genes. Further analysis using immunohistochemistry was performed in a subset of materials to compare the presence of T cells, B cells, and macrophages. Enrichment testing using Gene Ontology (GO) analysis revealed that the 227 most differentially expressed genes were mainly involved in an inflammatory response. Twenty-one GO biological processes were identified [p < 0.05, false discovery rate (FDR) < 5%], several with B-cell-associated inflammation. Cell-type Identification by Estimating Relative Subsets of RNA Transcripts (CIBERSORT) analysis identified macrophages as the most common inflammatory cell type in both groups, further supported by immunostaining of CD68. Radiation remarkably increased B-cell infiltration in the capsular region of biopsies, as quantified by immunostaining of CD20 (p=0.016). Transcript analysis and immunohistochemistry revealed inflammatory responses in capsular biopsies regardless of radiotherapy. However, the radiation response specifically involved B-cell-associated inflammatory responses.

Are patients most satisfied with a synthetic or a biological mesh in dual-plane immediate breast reconstruction after 5 years? A randomized controlled trial comparing the two meshes in the same patient

Biological or synthetic meshes are commonly used in implant-based immediate breast reconstruction (IBR). The aim of this study was to compare patient-reported outcome measurements (PROMs) after IBR with a synthetic mesh and a biological mesh, in a single-blinded randomized controlled trial, using the compared materials in the same patient, thereby eliminating patient-related confounders. Twenty-four patients were recruited, and all patients had a prophylactic bilateral mastectomy and a dual-plane reconstruction using anatomical breast implants. The patients' two breasts were randomized preoperatively to a biological or a synthetic mesh, using a simple approach with a parallel design. PROMs were measured with BREAST-Q. Twenty-one patients answered (88%). Most participants were equally satisfied/dissatisfied with the synthetic and the biological mesh sides regarding size of bra, softness, feel to touch, natural part of body, appearance compared with preoperatively, and palpable wrinkles, and about half of the patients regarding shape of bra, natural appearance, and visible wrinkles. The frequency of capsular contracture rate was zero in both groups at 5 years. One mesh type was not clearly superior to the other regarding PROMs, but biological and synthetic meshes seem to give rise to different types of reconstructed breasts, and more studies are needed regarding whether knowledge about the effects of different meshes can be used to tailor breast reconstructions to individual patients' wishes. The rate of complications and corrections in the biological mesh breasts was higher, and this must be considered when the type of mesh is chosen. Trial registration number: ClinicalTrials.Gov identifier NCT02985073.

Long-term outcomes of implant-based immediate breast reconstruction with and without radiotherapy: a population-based study.

Radiotherapy (RT) is a risk factor for impaired outcomes after implant-based immediate breast reconstruction (IBR). Large studies including long-term follow-up are relatively scarce. The purpose of this analysis was to assess long-term effects of RT in implant-based IBR, distinguishing between implant removal because of postoperative complications versus patient preference. This population-based cohort study included all patients with breast cancer who underwent implant-based IBR in Stockholm between 2005 and 2015. Data were collected through national registers and medical charts. The main endpoint was implant removal owing to postoperative complications (wound breakdown, infection, bleeding) or patient preference (dissatisfaction, pain, capsular contracture), with or without conversion to autologous reconstruction. Some 1749 implant-based IBRs in 1687 women were included. Median follow-up was 72 (range 1-198) months. Reconstructions were divided according to receipt of RT: No RT (n = 856, 48.9 per cent), adjuvant RT (n = 749, 42.8 per cent), and previous RT (n = 144, 8.2 per cent). Implant removal occurred after 266 reconstructions (15.2 per cent); 68 (7.9 per cent) in the no RT, 158 (21.1 per cent) in the adjuvant RT, and 40 (27.8 per cent) in the previous RT group. Implant removal was because of postoperative complications in 152 instances (57.1 per cent) and was most common in the first 3 years. This was especially observed in the previous RT group, where 15 of 23 implant removals occurred during the first 6 months. Implant removal owing to patient preference (114 of 266, 42.9 per cent) became more common with increasing follow-up. Implant removal after implant-based IBR is significantly associated with RT. The reason for implant removal shifts over time from postoperative complications to patient preference.

Post-mastectomy adjuvant radiotherapy for direct-to-implant and two-stage implant-based breast reconstruction: A meta-analysis

In recent years, immediate replacement with a prosthesis (direct-to-implant, DTI) is gaining more popularity than two-staged methods (tissue expander followed by an implant, TEI). The safety of immediate implant-based breast reconstruction (IBR) is debatable when postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) is indicated. This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the outcomes of DTI and TEI procedures followed by PMRT. Studies searched in the PubMed/Embase/The Cochrane Library databases (1995-2021) were filtered by exclusion criteria. Cases were divided into PMRT and non-irradiated groups, PMRT with a permanent implant or tissue expander. The outcomes were capsular contracture and other complications. A total of 22 studies with 6964 patients were included. PMRT increased the risk of capsular contracture in DTI patients and caused other complications in TEI patients. In PMRT and non-irradiated groups, the mean rates of capsular contracture were 17.01% versus 3.30% (p<0.01) in IBR and 15.49% versus 5.70% (p<0.01) in DTI. The mean rates of other complications were 22.59% versus 11.29% (p<0.01) in IBR, 31.88% versus 27.87% (p=0.35) in DTI, and 22.11% versus 9.90% (p<0.01) in TEI. Implants and tissue expanders caused a similar rate of capsular contracture and other complications. PMRT is related to a higher risk of complication and capsular contracture in IBR, including DTI procedure. This negative effect may not be related to the type of breast contents during radiotherapy.

Helical tomotherapy for post-mastectomy radiation therapy with or without breast implant: a single institution experience

IntroductionWe report on our experience of using Helical Tomotherapy (HT) in the context of post-mastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT) with or without immediate implant-based breast Reconstruction (IBR). Material and methodsThe study included a total of 173 patients who underwent PMRT with HT between 2013 and 2015 in our institution (87 immediate breast reconstructions with retropectoral implants (IBR + ), 86 without reconstructions (IBR-)). The chest wall target volume included subcutaneous tissue and pectoralis muscle and excluded the posterior region of the implant as well as the ribs. ResultsMedian time to initiation of the first adjuvant treatment from mastectomy was similar between the two groups (p = 0.134). Dose coverage to the chest wall was significantly improved for the IBR + group (V95% = 95.1 % versus 92.0 %; p < 0.0001). The irradiated volume of the ipsilateral lung was significantly decreased in the IBR + group with a median V20Gy of 11.6 %, compared to 15.2 % for the control group (p < 0.0001). The median heart V15Gy was also significantly lower in the IBR + group than in the control group (1.7 vs 2.5 %; p = 0.0280). The reconstruction failure rate was 14.9% (n = 13). After a median follow-up of 65 months, loco regional recurrence rate was low in both groups: 3 patients (3.4%) in the IBR + group and 5 patients (5.8%) in the control group, without any local recurrence in the posterior part of the implant. ConclusionsThe presence of a breast implant reduces cardiac and pulmonary doses during Tomotherapy irradiation, without compromising oncological outcomes.

Patient-reported outcomes following bilateral prophylactic mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction: comparing implant-based with autologous breast reconstruction

BackgroundSince the number of breast cancer genetic gene testing is increasing, more women opt for bilateral prophylactic mastectomy (BPM) followed by breast reconstruction. However, little is known about the differences in Quality of Life (QoL) after various reconstructive surgeries in this population. In this study, the long-term breast-related, body-related, and health-related QoL between immediate implant-based breast reconstruction (IBBR) and autologous breast reconstruction (ABR) were compared, in women who underwent BPM.MethodsIn this cross-sectional study, women who underwent postmastectomy breast reconstruction between January 2015 and December 2018 were invited for an online questionnaire, in which the BREAST-Q, the BODY-Q and the SF-36 were included. Women who underwent BPM and immediate breast reconstruction were included for analysis. Multivariable linear regression analysis was performed to adjust mean differences in patient-reported outcomes between IBBR and ABR for potential confounders.ResultsOf the included women (n = 47), 33 underwent ABR and 14 women underwent IBBR following BPM. BREAST-Q scores were in favor of the ABR group before and after adjustment, with statistically significance on Satisfaction with breasts (mean difference 15.8, p = 0.019) and Physical well-being (mean difference 13.5, p = 0.033). None of the mean differences in BODY-Q and SF-36 scores between groups, before and after adjustment, were statistically significant.ConclusionThis study suggests that there is a higher satisfaction with breasts and better physical well-being in women who underwent immediate ABR compared to those who underwent immediate IBBR after BPM. However, these data should be interpreted carefully as a result of selection bias and a small sample size.Level of Evidence: Level III, risk study.