Imperative Statement Research Articles

Analysis of Imperative Sentences in Tasya Farasya's Skincare Video Tutorial on YouTube

In order to follow the procedures for utilizing good and appropriate skincare in the Tasya Farasya skincare lesson youtube video, this study intends to uncover the types of imperative sentences in the film. Sentences with imperatives are those that issue commands. Oral or written instructions may be given for this. According to the Great Dictionary of the Indonesian Language (KBBI), imperative sentences serve as directives or orders in general. An imperative statement directs or asks the listener to act in the speaker's preferred way. The research methodology utilized in this study is qualitative research, which aims to understand what the research subject is feeling by expressing it in language or words in a context using a scientific technique. The author of this study has chosen to use a qualitative method of research because the researcher's title is more focused on describing something, and the qualitative design is consistent with the researcher's title given that this study also aims to analyze the imperative sentences found in Tasya Farasya's YouTube videos. This study adopted a descriptive qualitative methodology.

Law myth as a value basis of the law reality of Russia

The purpose of this article is an axiological research of the role of the law myth in the construction and functioning of the law reality of Russia. The methodological basis of the research is a postclassical paradigm, which focused on an interdisciplinary philosophical and law research of law phenomena in a broad historical and sociocultural context, and the corresponding socio-constructivist approach, which involving the research of law reality as a result of human subjective and intersubjective creative activity. One of the areas of human activity is the law myth, which plays a large role in the creation and functioning of law reality. Results: Axiological research of law myths allows to identify their theoretical and practical potential in the law life of a person and law reality. Each epoch has its own authoritarian and stable law myths, which are designed to create a certain image of law reality, which correlates with the value expectations of subjects of law consciousness and law culture. The law myth always has its core law value. The law myth appears as an internally-ordered imperative statement, which is aimed at the formation of a certain element of the image of law reality. Through law mythology, there is a legitimization of the processes taking place in society, primarily in the most normative spheres of society in politics and law. There is an attribution one or another meaning to social phenomena. Thus, law myths penetrate to legislation, acquiring the role of an ideological source of law. Identification of the myth by the law conscience turns it into a definite matrix, which serves as a standard for assessing the relevant law behavior. The law myth has a dichotomous nature. On the one hand, it is intended to interpret law reality. On the other hand, myths construct reality not only mentally, but also verbally.

The Effects of Age and Type of Imperative Statement on Behavioral Intention and Recall

The Effects of Age and Type of Imperative Statement on Behavioral Intention and Recall

Pembelajaran dengan Metode Kisah (storytelling): Ekstensi dan Intensi Metode Linguistik dalam Bahasa Al Qur’an dengan Bentuk Imperatif

Long before writing, the only culture was oral and oral culture. Storytelling means participating, and helping children participate, in one of the most ancient human habits. The meaning we can draw from Gabriel's hadith as a way to understand the world of 'religious meaning' and be reminded that formal learning remains significant but that, interestingly, the Qur'an does not mention these activities while imperatively declaring "telling stories story (fa-qsis al-qasas) ". This paper aims to describe: how learning with storytelling methods: extension and intention of linguistic methods in the language of the Qur'an with an imperative form. The results of the discussion can be summarized as follows: the imperative statement in the verses of the Qur'an is not strange; has been the subject of much debate. The commandment has been mentioned in various forms in the Quran which imply reproach, ridicule, obedience, exclamation and so on. This method is associated with the rhetorical aspects of the Quran while the rhetoric is related to the linguistic wonders of the Quran

Статусно-ролевые отношения коммуникантов в ситуациях уговаривания

The speech genre (SG) “persuasion” is investigated on the material of literary-fictitious dialogues in Russian literature. The relevance of the study is determined by the presence of many unresolved issues in the field of the theory of SG, the existence of transitional and hybrid forms of SG, the need to analyze socio-cultural factors of achieving communicative agreement. The novelty of the study is seen in the fact that there is a difference between SG “persuasion” in the narrow sense of the word (as one of the components in the communicative whole of a higher level) and in the broad sense - as a complex dialogical speech macrogenre of everyday communication, including, along with the actual persuasion, imperative statement, primary refusal (one or more) in the response, and the final statement with the final meaning of refusal or consent. Persuasion modelling depends on the initial mandatory subgenre, explicitness / implicitness of optional elements, repeatable structural components, achieving / not achieving illocutionary aims. Special attention is paid to the analysis of sociocultural factors of success / failure of speech actions: status-role relations of communicants, explicit and / or hidden illocutionary goal, the use of emotional and logical verbal means, the inclusion of elements of the related genre of coercion, a set of communicative strategies and tactics.

Kelsen: A Purely Empty Theory of Law

Kelsen's position is founded upon an epistemology which is both objectivist, regarding the existence of truths, and subjectivist, regarding normative positions. This epistemological bifurcation leads to a variety of contradictions in Kelsen's positions, and explains his reversals regarding the possibility of normative inference, the real or metaphorical existence of a fundamental norm, and constructivism. Aside from these contradictions, this 'split' explains certain terminological ambiguities: Kelsen confounds conditionals (statements in the form of 'if then') with imperatives under one term, 'norm'. This ambiguity is not resolved through the distinction between and statement, for the distinction between legal norm and legal statement is a distinction between the domain of legal science and of law. The confusion of an order (an imperative statement) and a conditional (a statement in the form of if then) remains, for the distinction between legal statement and statement of legal science refers to another thing entirely: the epistemological distinction between two different domains of study, and not to the epistemological distinction between two different intentional entities. Reversals on constructivism, normative inference, and the real or metaphorical character of the fundamental norm reveal that Kelsen's theory suffers from a fundamental conceptual flaw in the definition of his basic unit of analysis. The result is a theory that is not merely devoid of prescriptive utility (no normative content) but also is internally incoherent. Table of Contents Kelsen : A Purely Empty Theory of Law 1 A. Normative Inference 3 1. Refusal of Normative Inference 4 2. The Normative Syllogism 13 3. Demonstration of Legal Inferencing 15 B. Critique: 18 1. Terminology 18 a. Polysemy 18 b. Ambiguity: 20 c. Confusion 21 d. What neutrality? 22 2. Useless Complexity 23 a. Terminological Multiplication 23 b. Multiplication of syllogisms 23 c. Imputation: A useless Distinction 24 d. A Special Juridical Logic? 24 e. The Posthumous Character of the ATN 24 3. Methodological Apory 25 4. Problem of Postulats 25 a. Separation of law and morality 25 b. The Basic Norm 25 5. Tautology of the Basic Norm 26 6. Rationalisation 26 7. From Subjective to Objective Signification 28 C. Conclusion 28

2.1.1 Automated Requirements Quality Analysis through Requirements Comparisons

AbstractGiven the importance of key requirements documents such as the function and performance specification to the outcome of a systems engineering project, it is important to ensure that a system's requirements are captured and managed well. While contemporary requirements engineering tools are effective at the latter, they offer little assistance in preparing and assessing a set of requirements. This issue has been the subject of an ongoing research project within the Defence and Systems Institute at the University of South Australia that has led to the definition of a context‐free grammar that underpins both a requirements entry wizard and a requirements assessment engine. This engine performs what we call Level 1 assessment in that it ensures that all the necessary components of the imperative statement are present and that the requirement passes elementary tests for reasonableness. This paper describes how through automated comparison of requirements statements much more powerful requirement assessments can be performed. The paper opens by describing a methodology to assess sets of requirements that can be applied at what we call the second and third levels of our three‐tiered requirement assessment approach: namely, consistency checking across the requirements set and context‐based reasoning that seeks to apply a degree of real‐world reasoning based on a comparison of the requirements for the system of interest against industry norms. To facilitate the comparison processes, this paper introduces and describes a finite set of comparison outcomes that can be used to characterise each comparison and become the input for further reasoning. The paper proceeds by showing how the second‐tier assessment can be achieved by comparing each requirement within a requirements set against all of the other requirements thus identifying inconsistent and contradictory requirements. Similarly, the paper shows how the third‐tier assessment can be achieved by comparing the overall meaning of the requirements set against that of benchmark sets. While the paper describes requirements matching concepts that are useful, it also identifies that there are numerous issues that need to be addressed to allow the concept to reach its full potential.

The Saint in the Brothel: Or, Eloquence Rewarded

THE FIFTY-THIRD DECLAMATION IN Lazarus Piot's 1596 translation Alexander Silvayn's Orator tells a tale of her who having killed a man being in stewes, for her chastity and innocencie to be an Abbesse. narrative is prefaced by an imperative statement in guise a law: The order religious women is such, as they must be pure, chast, and free from all crime, but Abbesse must be chastest all rest. declamation that follows subjects this fictive law to a narrative that challenges its implicit definitions chastity and purity: It chanced that a certaine yoong Nunne Naples was to saile into Sicilie to be an Abbesse there; but en route she was captured by pirates, who sold her to a brothel. When clients were brought to her, she persuaded them to give her the accustomed reward while leaving her a virgin. A soldier who could not be so persuaded tried to rape her. She killed him with his own sword. She stood trial for murder and was acquitted. Then she sailed on to Sicily, where she claimed for her chastity and innocencie to be an Abbesse. Piot's declamation, printed as an analogue to Shakespeare's Pericles in Bullough's Narrative and Dramatic Sources Shakespeare, emerges from a nexus legal, religious, literary, and rhetorical contexts that form prehistory brothel scenes in Pericles.1 declamation was originally gathered among those Seneca Elder as controversia Sacerdos Prostituta. Like would-be abbess Piot's declamation, Senecan character Prostitute Priestess has been abducted by pirates, sold to a pimp, and held captive in a brothel. She has defended herself against rape, first through eloquence and then through homicide, killing soldier who

The structure of programming languages

The following are identified as major components of every programming language: (1) the elementary program statement, (2) mechanisms for linking elementary statements together, (3) the means by which a program can obtain data inputs. Several alternative forms of each of these components are described, compared and evaluated. Many examples, frequently from list processing languages, illustrate the forms described. Elementary program statements usually take the form of commands , requirements , or implicit specifications . A command is an imperative statement that commands the action to be taken. A requirement describes the effect to be achieved without saying anything about the actions to be taken. An implicit specification is similar to a requirement, but the programmer must understand what actions will be taken to achieve the desired effect. Subroutines may be entered explicitly , by execute call , or by function composition . Explicitly called subroutines generally require special linkage conventions. An execute subroutine call is syntactically indistinguishable from a basic instruction of the programming language. Function composition is a convenient alternative to the explicit call. The three principal ways of getting inputs for routines are (1) by referring to the data itself, (2) by referring to the data by a “name”, and (3) by referring to it implicitly by means of variables or functions. Names are useful entry points into permanent data structures, but can be error-causing distractions in other contexts. The author discusses advantages, disadvantages, and factors influencing the choice of a form of component for a language. He concludes by suggesting the evolution of programming languages toward one which will permit all