Impact Performance Of Helmets Research Articles

Effects of Including a Penetration Test in Motorcyclist Helmet Standards: Influence on Helmet Stiffness and Impact Performance

Regulation ECE-22.05/06 does not require a helmet penetration test. Penetration testing is controversial since it has been shown that it may cause the helmet to behave in a non-desirable stiff way in real-world crashes. This study aimed to assess the effect of the penetration test in the impact performance of helmets. Twenty full-face motorcycle helmets were penetration tested at multiple locations of the helmet shell. Then, 10 helmets were selected and split into two groups (hard shell and soft shell) depending on the results of the penetration tests. These 10 helmets were then drop tested at front, lateral, and top areas at two different impact speeds (5 m/s and 8.2 m/s) to assess their impact performance against head injuries. The statistical analyses did not show any significant difference between the two groups (hard/soft shell) at 5 m/s. Similar results were observed at 8.2 m/s, except for the top area of the helmet in which the peak linear acceleration was significantly higher for the soft shell group than for the hard shell group (230 ± 12 g vs. 211 ± 11 g; p-value = 0.038). The results of this study suggest that a stiffer shell does not necessarily cause helmets to behave in a stiffer way when striking rigid flat surfaces. These experiments also showed that hard shell helmets can provide better protection at higher impact speeds without damaging helmet performance at lower impact speeds.

Managing head injury risks in competitive skateboarding: what do we know?

ObjectivesThe broad objective of this paper is to inform policy, practice and research regarding the management of head injury risks in competitive skateboarding. The main motivation for the current study...

Density Variation in the Expanded Polystyrene Foam of Bicycle Helmets and Its Influence on Impact Performance.

Bicycle helmets attenuate head impacts using expanded polystyrene (EPS) foam liners. The EPS density plays a key role in determining the helmet and head response during an impact. Prior pilot work in our lab showed that EPS density varied by up to 18 kg/m3 within a single helmet, and thus the purpose of this study was to quantify the regional density variations within and between helmets and to establish how these variations influence helmet impact performance. We evaluated 10-12 samples of two traditional and two bicycle motocross (BMX) bicycle helmets with EPS liners. The bulk liner density and density of 16-19 cores extracted from specific locations on each sample were measured. Additional samples of two of these helmet models were then impacted at 3.0, 6.3, and 7.8 m/s to determine the relationship between local EPS density and helmet impact performance. We found that density varied significantly within each sample in all helmet models and also varied significantly between samples in three helmet models. The density variations were not symmetric across the midline in two of the four helmet models. The observed density variations influenced the helmets' impact performance. Our data suggest that variations in peak headform acceleration during impacts to the same location on different samples of the same helmet model can be partially explained by density differences between helmet samples. These density variations and resulting impact performance differences may play a role in a helmet's ability to mitigate head injury.

A review of laboratory methods and results used to evaluate protective headgear in American football

As head trauma becomes more firmly associated with American football, research has focused on improving the impact performance of protective headgear. Since helmet use became mandatory in 1939–1940, both helmet design and laboratory methods used to evaluate helmet impact performance have evolved. Through a comprehensive review of the literature, this article analyzes the impact results from laboratory evaluations of helmet performance, including a look at the evolution of protective headgear performance in football. In total, 35 separate studies conducted between 1975 and 2017 were used to examine current testing methodologies and reported impact results from headgear performance laboratory assessments. This review showed that the evolution in helmet design over the last 50 years has resulted in a decrease in linear and rotational acceleration of an impacted headform. The most common laboratory methods used to reconstruct football-specific head impacts included (1) linear drop methods, (2) pendulum methods, and (3) pneumatic ram methods. Each method provided greater understanding of helmet impact performance, helmet design, and use in football, with each method having specific limitations in the evaluation of protective headgear performance.

Comparative Study of Motorcycle Helmets Impact Performance

Two sets of new and in-service helmets were impact tested using a drop test machine, in accordance to established helmet test protocols. The first test for full helmets was executed in compliance with standard speed requirements of 5.9 m/s in which three of five new helmets performed poorly. The second set utilized lower impact speed of 4 m/s for individual helmet components test. New helmet liners absorbed 5 times more impact energy than the in-service liners while the new shell was 19.3% better in dispersing impact energy than the in-service shell. The undesirable changes in liner thickness have explicit effect on the liner density which is translated into reduction in energy absorbing potential. In brief, exposure to weathering stresses and use intensities has affected helmet impact performance, regardless of service duration.

Impact dynamics of metal foam shells for motorcycle helmets: Experiments & numerical modeling

To reduce the weight of motorcycle helmet, metal foam for outer shell in place of conventional thermoplastics was tested. The dynamic behaviour of this new helmet was studied through experiments and numerical modeling. Open-face motorcycle helmets were designed with metal foam shell and impact experiments were performed with these helmets fitted on a headform. A finite element model was developed and the predicted acceleration of headform from this model was validated against the experiments. The mechanical behaviour of full-face helmets with metal foam shell was investigated next. The FE analysis was performed separately with rigid and deformable heads. Head injury criterion (with rigid head) and stresses in brain (with deformable head) were evaluated separately for metal foam shell and ABS shell helmets. The helmet impact performance is examined with two separate densities of metal foam. The shell with low-density metal foam (150 kg/m 3) gives a better performance compared to ABS shell. The metal foam shell showed significant visible plastic deformation in the impact region.

Cricket helmet impact performance

Cricket helmet impact performance