Impact Of Total Cholesterol Research Articles

Vascular comorbidities in patients with multiple sclerosis and their impact on physical disability.

Aim Given the impact of vascular comorbidities (VC) on the diagnosis, treatment, and outcome of multiple sclerosis (MS), we examined the incidence and correlation of VC and risk factors for vascular disease in people with MS (PwMS) compared to the general population, and the impact on the physical disability of patients. Methods Cross-sectional study involved 100 patients with MS and 50 healthy people from the general population, matched by sex and age. The values of demographic, biochemical, and anthropometric parameters, the presence of VC and risk factors for vascular diseases in both groups, and clinical parameters in PwMS were analysed. Statistical analysis included methods of descriptive statistics, χ2 test, Student's t-test, analysis of variance, correlation and regression analysis. Results Groups differed by a higher frequency of transient ischemic attack in the control group (p=0.024), and the treatment of hypertension (p=0.038) and smoking frequency (p=0.044) in the MS group. Normal triglycerides levels were statistically significantly more prevalent in the MS group (p=0.000). Total body weight and BMI were statistically significantly higher in the control group (p=0.000). The increase in Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score was associated with higher levels of total (p=0.001) and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol (p=0.003), and activated partial thromboplastin time APTT (p=0.002). Conclusion In PwMS it is necessary to pay attention to the higher frequency of smoking than in general population, and the impact of total cholesterol, LDL and APTT levels as significant parameters that affect physical disability.

Comparison of Formula-Based Methods with Diverse TGL: VLDL-C Ratio for Calculating LDL-C in a Tertiary Care Hospital.

Background The most popular Friedewald formula (FF) was tailored with a fixed factor of 5 for triglyceride-very low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (TGL:VLDL-C) ratio. Some of the subsequent studies on diverse population demonstrated modified FF with only altered TGL:VLDL-C ratio, comprising either a fixed or an adjustable factor. Hata and Nakajima as well as Puavilai et al proposed fixed factors of 4 and 6, respectively. Recently, Martin et al recommended an adjustable factor derived as N-strata-specific median TGL:VLDL-C ratio based on TGL and non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C). Aim This comparative retrospective study evaluates the efficacy of LDL-C formulae, varying only in TGL-VLDL-C ratio, using direct LDL-C assay as a reference method in a tertiary care hospital. Materials and Methods A total of 1,747 patient records with lipid profile data were procured. Concordance analysis, absolute difference, and post hoc test were employed as analytical tools. The impact of total cholesterol (TChol), TGL, and HDL-C on formulae was also evaluated. Results Overall, Martin equation had relatively the highest concordance, narrowest absolute difference, and minimal influence of TChol, TGL, and HDL-C. On the contrary, the Hata method revealed comparatively the lowest concordance, widest absolute difference, and high influence of TChol, TGL, and HDL-C. The remaining formula-based approaches, that is, FF and Puavilai calculation, executed mostly inconsistent intermittent features between Martin equation and Hata method. Conclusion Relatively dominant and competitive analytical attributes of the Martin equation with an adjustable TGL:VLDL-C factor outweigh the remaining three formulae-based methods with fixed TGL:VLDL-C factor in Indian adults.

The Relationship between Lipid Profile and Erectile Dysfunction

To evaluate the relationship between serum lipids including cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein (LDL), high-density lipoprotein (HDL), and triglyceride and erectile dysfunction (ED). From January 2000 to June 2003, 100 patients with organic ED, who were referred to our center, were selected and their lipid profile (Cholesterol, Triglyceride, HDL, LDL) were assessed. The results were compared with those in 100 healthy individuals. Mean age of men in the study and control groups were 43.72 +/- 9.76 and 43.59 +/- 10.51 years, respectively. Mean plasma cholesterol and LDL levels in individuals suffering from erectile dysfunction were significantly higher than controls (P = 0.04 and P = 0.02, respectively). However, no difference in the mean plasma triglyceride and HDL levels was seen. Odds Ratios for high plasma cholesterol level (>240 mg/dl) and high plasma LDL level (>160 mg/dl) were 1.74 and 1.97, respectively (r2 = 0.04 and r2 = 0.04). Using linear regression analysis, the regression coefficient for cholesterol and LDL versus the International Index of Erectile Dysfunction Questionnaire (IIEF) score were -0.036 and -0.035, respectively (95% confidence interval: 0.98 - 2.5 for cholesterol and 1.13 - 2.81 for LDL). The impact of total cholesterol and particularly LDL on men's erectile function underlines the role of hyperlipidemia treatment in prevention of ED and emerges a holistic management in ED patients.