Impact Of Previous Abdominal Surgery Research Articles

Impact of Previous Abdominal Surgery and Timing of Peritoneal Metastases on Accuracy of Imaging in Predicting the Surgical PCI: A Report From the PRECINCT Study.

In this report from Phase 1 of the prospective, observational, PRECINCT (Pattern of peritoneal dissemination and REsponse to systemic Chemotherapy IN Common and uncommon peritoneal Tumours) study, a correlation was performed between the radiological PCI (peritoneal cancer index; rPCI) and surgical PCI (sPCI). The impact of timing of peritoneal malignancy (PM) and previous abdominal surgery was also studied. The rPCI and sPCI were considered the 'same' if they differed by ≤ 3 points. The agreement was assessed using Bland-Altman analysis and the strength of the agreement was assessed using the concordance correlation coefficient (CCC). The extent of prior surgery was classified according to prior surgical score (PSS). In 707 (79.4%) patients, rPCI and sPCI concurred in 280 (39.6%). In the Bland-Altman analysis, < 40% patients were in the ±3 PCI points limit of acceptable difference. The average difference between the two scores was 4.5 points (95% CI- -5.16 to -3.92). The CCC- was 0.59 for the whole cohort ('moderate' concordance) and was not influenced by imaging modality, timing of PM or PSS. The rPCI underestimated sPCI by an average of 4.5 points. The role of peritoneal MRI in patients undergoing iterative procedures and the performance of imaging according to sites of recurrence need further evaluation.

Feasibility of a novel unassisted single-channel transcolonic endoscopic appendectomy for the treatment of appendiceal lesions (with video).

Transcolonic endoscopic appendectomy (TEA) is rapidly evolving and has been reported as a minimally invasive alternative to appendectomy. We aimed to characterize the feasibility and safety of a novel unassisted single-channel TEA. We retrospectively investigated 23 patients with appendicitis or appendiceal lesions who underwent TEA from February 2016 to December 2022. We collected clinicopathological characteristics, procedure‑related parameters, and follow‑up data and analyzed the impact of previous abdominal surgery and traction technique. The mean age was 56.0years. Of the 23 patients with appendiceal lesions, fourteen patients underwent TEA and nine underwent traction-assisted TEA (T-TEA). Eight patients (34.8%) had previous abdominal surgery. The En bloc resection rate was 95.7%. The mean procedure duration was 91.1 ± 45.5min, and the mean wound closure time was 29.4 ± 18.6min. The wounds after endoscopic appendectomy were closed with clips (21.7%) or a combination of clip closure and endoloop reinforcement (78.3%), and the median number of clips was 7 (range, 3-15). Three patients (13.0%) experienced major adverse events, including two delayed perforations (laparoscopic surgery) and one infection (salvage endoscopic suture). During a median follow-up of 23months, no residual or recurrent lesions were observed, and no recurrence of abdominal pain occurred. There were no significant differences between TEA and T-TEA groups and between patients with and without abdominal surgery groups in each factor. Unassisted single-channel TEA for patients with appendiceal lesions has favorable short- and long-term outcomes. TEA can safely and effectively treat appendiceal disease in appropriately selected cases.

The impact of previous abdominal surgery on colorectal cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery.

The current study aimed to investigate whether previous abdominal surgery (PAS) could affect the outcomes of colorectal cancer (CRC) surgery. We conducted the search strategy in three databases (PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library) from inception to May 26, 2022. The short-term and long-term outcomes were compared between the PAS group and the non-PAS group. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled up. Stata (V.16.0) software was used for data analysis. We included 34,827 patients from 14 studies in the current study. After pooling up all the data, we found that there were higher proportions of overall complications (OR = 1.12, I2 = 4.65%, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.23, P = 0.01), ileus (OR = 1.96, I2 = 59.74%, 95% CI 1.12 to 3.44, P = 0.02) and mortality (OR = 1.26, I2 = 0.00%, 95% CI 1.11 to 1.42, P = 0.00) in the PAS group than the non-PAS group. Patients with a history of PAS had higher risks of overall complications and death following CRC surgery. However, it did not appear to significantly affect the short-term outcomes apart from ileus. Surgeons should raise awareness of patients with a history of PAS, and take steps to reduce postoperative complications and mortality.

Impact of previous abdominal surgery on the outcome of fundoplication for medically refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease in children and young adults

Summary Importance Fundoplication (FP) is a well-established surgical treatment for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) refractory to medical therapy in children and young adults. During FP, previous abdominal surgery (PAS) can impair the patient’s outcome by causing technical difficulties and increasing intra- and postoperative complication rates. Objective The aim of this study was to determine the impact of PAS on the short- and long-term outcome following FP for refractory GERD in a cohort of patients aged &lt; 23 years. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 182 patients undergoing a total of 201 FP procedures performed at our university center for pediatric surgery from February 1999 to October 2019. Pre-, intra-, and postoperative variables were recorded and their impact on the rate of intraoperative complications and revision FP (reFP) was analyzed. Results A total of 201 FP procedures were performed on 182 patients: 119 (59.2%) as Thal-FP (180° anterior wrap) and 82 (40.8%) as Nissen-FP (360°circular wrap; 67.2% laparoscopic, 32.8% open, 8.9% conversion). The presence of PAS (95 cases, 47.3%) was associated with significantly longer operative times for FP (153.4 ± 53.7 vs.126.1 ± 56.4 min, p = 0.001) and significantly longer hospital stays (10.0 ± 7.0 vs. 7.0 ± 4.0 days, p &lt; 0.001), while the rates of intraoperative surgical complications (1.1% vs. 1.9%, p = 1.000) and the rate re-FP in the long term (8.4% vs. 15.1%, p = 0.19) during a follow-up period of 53.4 ± 44.5 months were comparable to the group without PAS. Conclusion In cases of PAS in children and young adults, FP for refractory GERD might necessitate longer operative times and longer hospital stays but can be performed with surgery-related short- and long-term complication rates comparable to cases without PAS.

Impact of previous abdominal surgery on laparoscopic donor hepatectomy for living donor liver transplantation

Jaehun YANG, Jong Man KIM*, Sunghae PARK, Young Ju OH, Sang Oh YUN, Manuel LIM, Eun Sung JEONG, Ji Eun KWON, Kyeoung Deok KIM, Jinsoo RHU, Gyu-Seong CHOI, Jae-Won JOH. Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2022;26:S184. https://doi.org/10.14701/ahbps.2022S1.LV-PP-2-3

Impact of previous abdominal surgery on laparoscopic donor hepatectomy for living donor liver transplantation

Impact of previous abdominal surgery on laparoscopic donor hepatectomy for living donor liver transplantation

Impact of previous abdominal surgery on robotic-assisted rectal surgery in patients with locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma: a propensity score matching study

BackgroundThe application of minimally invasive surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) and a history of previous abdominal surgery (PAS) remains controversial. This retrospective study with propensity score matching (PSM) investigated the impact of PAS on robotic-assisted rectal surgery outcomes in patients with locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma undergoing preoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT).MethodsIn total, 203 patients with locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma who underwent preoperative CCRT and robotic-assisted rectal surgery between May 2013 and December 2019 were enrolled. Patients were categorized into PAS and non-PAS groups based on the PAS history. The PSM caliper matching method with 1-to-3 matches was used to match PAS patients with non-PAS.ResultsOf the 203 enrolled patients, 35 were PAS patients and 168 were non-PAS patients. After PSM, 32 PAS patients and 96 non-PAS patients were included for analysis. No significant between-group differences were noted in the perioperative outcomes, including median console time (165 min (PAS) vs. 175 min (non-PAS), P = 0.4542) and median operation time (275 min (PAS) vs. 290 min (non-PAS), P = 0.5943) after PSM. Postoperative recovery and overall complication rates were also similar (all P > 0.05). Moreover, the between-group differences in pathological or short-term oncological outcomes were also nonsignificant (all P > 0.05). No 30-day postoperative deaths were observed in either group.ConclusionThe current results indicate that robotic-assisted surgery is safe and feasible for PAS patients with locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma undergoing preoperative CCRT. However, future prospective randomized clinical trials are required to verify these findings.

The Impact of Previous Abdominal Surgery in a High-Acuity Liver Transplant Population

BackgroundIt is not uncommon for liver transplant (LT) recipients to have had previous abdominal surgery (PAS) preceding transplant. The impact of PAS on morbidity and mortality in LT patients remains unclear. In this study, we investigated the correlation between PAS and LT outcomes in a high-acuity patient population. Materials and methodsThis is a single-center retrospective review of 936 adult primary LT recipients between 2012 and 2018. Patients were divided based on PAS history. PAS was subdivided into upper abdominal surgery (UAS) and lower abdominal surgery (LAS). UAS was separated into high-impact UAS and low-impact UAS. Finally, we studied patients with PAS ≤90 d versus PAS >90 d. ResultsExtensive adhesiolysis was the only significant perioperative factor between the PAS group (n = 367) and the non-PAS group (n = 569) (P < 0.001). Red blood cell (RBC) transfusion (20U versus 17U, P = 0.044) and abdominal packing (24.2% versus 13.3%, P = 0.008) were significantly higher in the UAS group (n = 186) versus the LAS group (n = 181). Patients with high-impact UAS required greater RBC (P = 0.021) and fresh frozen plasma transfusion (P = 0.005), and arterial conduits (P = 0.016) during LT. Compared with recipients with PAS >90 d (n = 338), recipients with PAS ≤90 d (n = 29) had significantly higher RBC transfusion (P = 0.046), fresh frozen plasma transfusion (P = 0.022), and abdominal packing (P = 0.025). No differences in patient and graft survival was observed. ConclusionsThese findings suggest that, with appropriate care in the perioperative setting, PAS is not a contraindication to successful LT. Careful consideration is warranted when risk stratifying patients with multiple comorbidities who had PAS, especially those with UAS or PAS ≤90 d.

Impact of previous abdominal surgery on the outcome of laparoscopy-assisted open appendicovesicostomy (Mitrofanoff) creation in children: a comparative study

For patients who require self-intermittent catheterization, a continent catheterizable stoma is a viable option. This patient population often has had previous abdominal surgery (PAS), a risk factor for complicated laparoscopic procedures. Therefore, the authors aim to determine whether PAS has an impact on the peri-operative outcomes of the laparoscopic-assisted Mitrofanoff procedure in children. A research ethics board-approved retrospective review was performed to assess peri-operative outcomes amongpediatric patients who underwent laparoscopic-assisted Mitrofanoff procedures in the authors institution from May 2000 to March 2016. Patients with no PAS were compared with those with intraperitoneal PAS. Demographic/baseline characteristics and peri-operative outcomes such as operative time, estimated blood loss, hospital stay, unanticipated additional operations, stomal stenosis, and urinary continence were compared. To ensure there is no confounding based on PAS characteristics, subgroups were created to compare the recency (PAS <1 year ago) and extent (ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt vs non-VP shunt PAS) to assess their peri-operative outcomes. Fisher's exact test and Mann-Whitney U test were used to determine statistical significance. Thirty-four patients (15 no PAS and 19 PAS) were included in the analysis. No significant difference in demographics and baseline characteristics was noted between the patient groups. The median age was 6.5 years (interquartile range [IQR] 4.8-14.0) and 9.9 years (4.2-14.3), respectively (NS). Peri-operative outcomes of operative time, estimated blood loss, and hospital stay were similar between the PAS and no PAS groups. There was no statistical difference in complications requiring surgical intervention (n=3, 20.0%; n=9, 47.4%). The median follow-up period was 25.9 (IQR 7.7-47.2) months and 28.0 (IQR 13.0-53.0) months, respectively (NS). Patients with VP shunts as their only PAS had higher estimated blood loss compared with no PAS group (50 [IQR 25-150], 25 [IQR 25-50], respectively) but without other differences in peri-operative outcomes. Findings support the use of a minimally invasive approach in this patient population as it is feasible, comparable, and safe but with careful consideration for risk factors that may predispose PAS patients to postsurgical complications requiring intervention. Although limited by small sample size, this study provides valuable insight into performing laparoscopic operations in children who have undergone prior surgeries and invites future studies to compare the outcomes between patients undergoing open, pure laparoscopic, and robotic-assisted laparoscopic Mitrofanoff procedures for children with PAS. Laparoscopic-assisted Mitrofanoff creation may be safely performed in children with PAS.

Deep Inferior Epigastric Artery Perforator Flap Breast Reconstruction in Women With Previous Abdominal Incisions: A Comparison of Complication Rates.

The deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap is currently the most widely used method for autologous microsurgical breast reconstruction. There are mixed data in the literature regarding the impact of previous abdominal surgery on DIEP flap success in breast reconstruction. With this study, we take a closer look at the effect of prior abdominal surgery on DIEP flap and donor-site complications, with a particular focus on the different types of incisions and their influence on surgical outcomes. A retrospective cohort study was conducted over a 6-year period. Five hundred forty-four consecutive DIEP flaps were divided into a control group (321 flaps) without previous abdominal surgery and an incision group (223 flaps) with previous abdominal surgery. A comparison between both groups was made in terms of flap and donor-site complications followed by a subgroup analysis based on single types of abdominal incisions. There were no significant differences between both groups in terms of age, body mass index, flap weight, smoking history, prior radiotherapy, diabetes, and coagulopathy (P > 0.05). The most common incision was low transverse incision (n = 116) followed by laparoscopy port (n = 103) and midline (n = 46) incisions. We found no significant differences between the control group and incision group in terms of flap complications. Subgroup analysis revealed that none of the 3 types of incision increase the flap or donor-site complications. Smoking and flap weight were the only 2 independent predictors for donor-site complications. The results from this large series of consecutive DIEP flaps from our institution confirm that autologous breast reconstruction with DIEP flap can be safely performed in patients who have had previous abdominal surgeries; however, counseling patients about smoking is critical to avoid potential donor-site complications.

The impact of previous abdominal surgery on clinical characteristics and prognosis of pyogenic liver abscess: A 10-year retrospective study of 392 patients.

Many pyogenic liver abscess (PLA) patients underwent abdominal surgery before. However, little is known about the impact of previous abdominal surgery on the clinical characteristics and prognosis of PLA.The clinical data of 392 adult PLA patients who received treatment at our hospital from January 1, 2007 to December 31, 2016 were collected. The demographic data, cause, comorbidities, surgery history, clinical features, laboratory results, imaging findings, microbiological characteristics, choices of treatment, and clinical outcomes were analyzed.In all, 177 PLA patients (45.2%) underwent abdominal surgery before. The median time for the occurrence of PLA after the most recent abdominal surgery was 2.0 (interquartile range 0.25, 6.0) years. PLA patients with a previous abdominal surgery history were more likely to have underlying diseases and presented with more abnormal laboratory values. Klebsiella pneumonia and Escherichia coli were the most common pathogens. Previous abdominal surgery appeared to increase the incidence of E coli. More PLA patients without a previous abdominal surgery history required surgical drainage. However, there were no differences in PLA-related complications, days required for temperature normalization, and length of hospital stay between the 2 groups.Because a large number of PLA patients had a history of abdominal surgery, and proper screening should be performed for patients with any suspicion of a liver abscess after abdominal surgery. Despite the differences in the coexisting conditions, clinical and microbiological characteristics between PLA patients with and without a previous abdominal surgery history, the overall short-term outcomes were comparable.

Impact of previous abdominal surgery on laparoscopic transperitoneal partial and radical nephrectomy

Impact of previous abdominal surgery on laparoscopic transperitoneal partial and radical nephrectomy

Does previous abdominal surgery adversely affect perioperative and oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic radical cystectomy?

BackgroundLaparoscopic radical cystectomy (LRC) has been shown to have less estimated blood loss (EBL), transfusion rate, narcotic analgesic requirement, earlier return of bowel function, and shorter hospital stay. The aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility, peri-operative and oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic radical cystectomy (LRC) in patients with previous abdominal surgery (PAS).MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed 243 patients undergoing open radical cystectomy (ORC) or LRC with bilateral pelvic lymph node dissection and urinary diversion or cutaneous ureterostomy at a single center from January 2010 to December 2015. Demographic parameters, intra-operative variables, peri-operative records, pathologic outcomes, and complication rate were reviewed to assess the impact of PAS on peri-operative and oncologic outcomes.ResultsPatients in both ORC and LRC subgroups were homogeneous in terms of demography characteristics including age, gender, BMI, ASA score, and comorbidity. Estimated blood loss (EBL) was higher in patients with PAS undergoing ORC compared to those with no PAS (P = 0.008). However, there was no significant difference of EBL among patients undergoing LRC with or without PAS (P = 0.896). There was no statistical difference in peri-operative parameters and pathological outcomes. Patients with PAS undergoing ORC and ileal conduit had a higher vascular injury rate (P = 0.017). Comparing patients with PAS performed by LRC and ORC, the number of patients with the vascular injury was higher in ORC groups regardless of the type of diversion (ileal conduit, P = 0.001, cutaneous ureterostomy, P = 0.025). There is no significant difference in other complications.ConclusionThe presence of adhesions from PAS is not a contraindication to LRC. Patients with PAS may benefit from LRC with lower estimated blood loss, fewer transfusion rates, and vascular injuries. Furthermore, the overall oncologic outcomes and complication rate are similar between LRC and ORC patients with PAS.

Laparoscopic and Robotic Surgeries for Patients With Colorectal Cancer Who Have Had a Previous Abdominal Surgery.

PurposeThe impact of previous abdominal surgery (PAS) on surgical outcomes from laparoscopic and robot surgeries is inconclusive. This study aimed to investigate the impact of PAS on perioperative outcomes from laparoscopic and robotic colorectal surgeries.MethodsFrom March 2007 to February 2014, a total of 612 and 238 patients underwent laparoscopic and robotic surgeries, respectively. Patients were divided into 3 groups: those who did not have a PAS (NPAS), those who had a major PAS, and those who had a minor PAS. We further divided the patients so that our final groups for analysis were: patients with NPAS (n = 478), major PAS (n = 19), and minor PAS (n = 115) in the laparoscopy group, and patients with NPAS (n = 202) and minor PAS (n = 36) in the robotic surgery group.ResultsIn the laparoscopy group, no differences in the conversion rates between the 3 groups were noted (NPAS = 1.0% vs. major PAS = 0% vs. minor PAS = 1.7%, P = 0.701). In the robotic surgery group, the conversion rate did not differ between the NPAS group and the minor PAS group (1.0% vs. 2.8%, P = 0.390). Among the groups, neither the operation time, blood loss, days to soft diet, length of hospital stay, nor complication rate were affected by PAS.ConclusionPAS did not jeopardize the perioperative outcomes for either laparoscopic or robotic colorectal surgeries. Therefore, PAS should not be regarded as an absolute contraindication for minimally invasive colorectal surgeries.

Right hepatectomy in living donors with previous abdominal surgery

Few studies have evaluated the impact of previous abdominal surgery (PAS) on living donor right hepatectomy (LDRH). The aim of this study was to investigate the outcomes of liver transplantation using right lobe grafts of living donors with PAS. Data were reviewed from LDRH patients at the authors' institution between March 2008 and November 2014. LDRH patients with PAS were divided into two groups according to upper PAS (group 1) or lower PAS (group 2), and they were compared to those without PAS (group 3) who were matched 1:1 based on age, gender, and body mass index. Perioperative data, complications by the Clavien classification, and the outcomes with more than 14 months follow-up were compared. Twenty-three (4.9%) of a total of 471 LDRH donors had PAS. Eleven donors were assigned to group 1, 12 to group 2, and 23 to group 3. Intraperitoneal adhesions were found in 20 (87.0%) of 23 donors with PAS, of whom 5 (21.7%) had adhesiolysis-related injuries that happened more commonly in group 1 than in group 2 (P=0.025). LDRH was successfully completed under upper midline laparotomy in all donors. No donors received perioperative blood transfusion. The peak postoperative AST, ALT, INR, and total bilirubin levels made no difference between the three groups. Compared with group 3, groups 1 and 2 had a longer operative time (P=0.012) and a higher grade I complication rate (P=0.047). All donors recovered fully to their routine activities. The 23 recipients of grafts from donors with PAS showed good liver function with 1-year graft and patient survivals of 100%. A history of PAS is not a contraindication to LDRH in the current era of advanced surgical techniques.

Impact of previous abdominal surgery on the outcome of laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer: a case-control study in 756 patients

BackgroundA history of previous abdominal surgery (PAS) may increase the complexity of laparoscopic colorectal surgery. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of PAS on the outcomes of laparoscopic colorectal resection for colorectal cancer. MethodsA total of 378 colorectal cancer patients (group A) with a history of PAS were 1:1 matched to 378 controls (group B) without PAS from our prospective laparoscopic colorectal surgery database. The two groups were matched for age, gender, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiology score, tumor location, type of surgical procedure, and tumor stage. ResultsPatients in the two groups were well balanced with respect to baseline demographic and clinical characteristics. Group A was associated with significantly longer median operating time (220 versus 200 min; P = 0.002). Conversion rate in group A (63/378, 16.67%) was almost twice as high as that in group B (36/378, 9.55%; P = 0.004). Conversions caused by adhesion were more common in patients with a history of PAS (55.56% [35/63] versus 27.78% [10/36], P = 0.008). Postoperative recovery time, length of postoperative hospital stay, perioperative mortality and morbidity rate, lymph nodes harvested, circumferential resection margin positive rate, 3-y disease-free survival, and overall survival rate were not significantly different between the two groups. ConclusionsLaparoscopic colorectal surgery for colorectal cancer patients with PAS is time consuming, but the incidence of a successfully completed laparoscopic colorectal resection remains high, and the short- and long-term outcomes are not affected by PAS.

Single-port laparoscopic colectomy is safe and feasible in patients with previous abdominal surgery

BackgroundThe aim of this study was to assess the impact of previous abdominal surgery (PAS) on single-port laparoscopic colectomy (SPLC). MethodsWe studied 429 consecutive patients who underwent SPLC in our department from May 2009 to December 2013. Patients were divided into 2 groups: those with PAS (PAS group) and those with NPAS (NPAS group). Operative parameters and outcomes were analyzed between the 2 groups retrospectively. ResultsSPLC was performed in 152 PAS patients and 277 NPAS patients. Eight patients in the PAS group and 6 patients in the NPAS group were converted to multiport laparoscopic colectomy (5.3% vs 2.2%, respectively; P = .077). Three patients in the PAS group and 2 patients in the NPAS group had inadvertent enterotomy (2.0% vs .7%, respectively; P = .352). No patients were converted to open surgery. There were no significant differences between the 2 groups in terms of blood loss, operative time, and postoperative outcomes. ConclusionOur experience has demonstrated the safety and feasibility of SPLC in patients with PAS.

Impact of previous abdominal surgery on short-term outcomes in laparoscopy-assisted radical resection for rectal cancer

To investigate the impact of previous abdominal surgery on short-term outcomes in laparoscopy-assisted radical resection for rectal cancer. Clinical data of 731 consecutive patients with rectal cancer who underwent laparoscopy-assisted radical resection in Union Hospital from January 2000 to December 2012 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were classified as having previous abdominal surgery(PAS group, n=121) or not having previous abdominal surgery (NPAS group, n=610). Short-term outcomes including intraoperative and postoperative parameters were compared. Data were analyzed by independent sample t-test, Chi-square test or Fisher's exact probability. The mean number of lymph nodes dissected was 18.8 ± 7.9 in PAS group and 18.9 ± 8.2 in NPAS group, the length of proximal resection margin was (15.0 ± 1.2) cm and (15.1 ± 1.3) cm respectively, the length of distal resection margin was (3.9 ± 1.4) cm and (3.8 ± 1.5) cm respectively. The differences between the two groups were not statistically significant(all P>0.05). Moreover, there were no significant differences in operative time, intraoperative blood loss, intraoperative blood transfusion, sphincter preservation operation rate, conversion rate, time to first flatus, time to liquid intake, postoperative ambulation time, postoperative hospital stay, -and postoperative complication rate between the two groups(all P>0.05). However, postoperative ileus was more frequent in PAS group than that in NPAS group(5.0% vs. 1.5%, P<0.05). Laparoscopy- assisted radical resection is safe and feasible for patients with rectal cancer who experienced abdominal operations. But the prevention and treatment of postoperative ileus should be handled with caution.

Impact of Previous Abdominal Surgery on Laparoscopic Cystectomy/Oophorectomy Results: A Comparative Clinical Study

Introduction: In the past, patients with previous abdominal surgery were discouraged from laparoscopic surgery because of perceived increased risk of bowel injury caused by needle and trocar insertion. However, data on the feasibility and safety of surgery of this nature is increasing. We aim to evaluate the surgical outcome of laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy/oophorectomy in previous abdominal surgery. Methods: This is a cross-sectional study with descriptive analysis of retrospective data collection from the electronic medical records of women with laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy/ oophorectomy from January 2000 until Dec 2008. Results from patients with previous abdominal surgery were compared with those of women without prior abdominal surgery. Results: Three hundred and seventeen (317) laparoscopic cystectomies/ oophorectomies were performed during the study period. 71 patients (22.5%) had previous history of abdominal surgery. Adhesions were found in 72% of patients versus 40% (p=0.001) who had previous abdominal surgery but the conversion to open surgery rate was similar (3%, p &lt; 0.05). There was no significant difference in blood loss (134.1 ml ±18.6 vs 119.0 ml ± 9.5), operating time (107 min ± 42.0 versus 102.6 min ± 42.6) and postoperative hospital stay (1.92 days ± 1.0 vs 1.91 days ± 0.7 ). The incidence of peri-operative and post-operative complication showed no significant difference in those who had undergone previous abdominal surgery than those without prior abdominal surgery (p=0.7). The overall complication rate in this series was 0.32 %. Conclusion: Laparoscopic cystectomy/ oophorectomy in the previous abdominal surgery is safe with no increase in morbidity.

Impact of previous abdominal surgery on the outcome of laparoscopic colectomy: a case-matched control study

Adhesions are a major risk for visceral injury and can increase the difficulty of both laparoscopic and open colectomy. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the impact of previous abdominal surgery on laparoscopic colectomy in terms of early outcome. We performed a case-control study of patients who underwent laparoscopic colectomy for colorectal disease. The case group comprised 91 patients with a history of prior abdominal surgery, while the 91 controls had no such history. Case and controls were matched for age, gender, site of primary disease, comorbidity on admission and body mass index. The two groups were homogeneous for demographic and clinical characteristics. Conversion rate was 16.5% in the case group and 8.8% in the control group (p=0.18). Of the 7 patients who underwent conversion because of adhesions, six had prior surgery (cases) and one did not (p=0.001). Operative time was 26 minutes longer in the case group than in the control group (p=0.001). Morbidity rate was 25.3% among cases and 23.1% for controls. Patients in the two groups experienced a similar time to recovery of bowel function, length of postoperative stay, and 30-day readmission rate. Laparoscopic colectomy in previously operated patients is a time-consuming operation, but it does not appear to affect the short-term postoperative outcome.