Impact Of Peripheral Arterial Disease Research Articles

Peripheral artery disease, antithrombotic treatment and outcomes in European and Asian patients with atrial aibrillation: a report from 2 prospective observational registries

Abstract Background In patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), the impact of peripheral artery disease (PAD) on oral anticoagulant (OAC) therapy use and the risk of outcomes remains unclear. Objective To analyse the epidemiology of PAD in a large cohort of European and Asian AF patients, and the impact on treatment patterns and risks of adverse outcomes. Methods We analysed AF patients from two large prospective observational registries. We identified patients with PAD as reported by the investigators. Logistic regression analysis was used to assess factor associated with the presence of PAD at baseline. OAC prescription and risk of outcomes were analyzed according to the presence of PAD, using adjusted Logistic and Cox regression analyses. The primary outcome was the composite of all-cause death and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs). Interaction analyses were also performed according to different subgroups. Results 15,497 patients with AF (mean age 68.9, SD 11.6 years; 38.6% female, 30% from Asia) were included in the analysis. PAD was found in 941 patients (6.1%), with higher prevalence among European individuals compared to Asian (8.1% vs 1.2%, p<0.001). Patients with PAD were older, more likely with permanent AF, more symptomatic and with higher thromboembolic and bleeding risk. On logistic regression analysis, European patients had 6-fold higher odds of presenting with PAD compared with Asians (Figure 1, Panel A). Other comorbidities and increasing age were associated with higher odds of prevalent PAD (Figure 1 Panel A). Conversely, female sex was associated with lower odds of having PAD at baseline. With age modelled as a continuous variable, and odds of PAD at baseline, there was a non-linear relationship, with the odds of PAD increasing almost linearly until 70 years, plateauing afterwards (Figure 1 Panel B). After adjustments, PAD was associated with lower use of OAC (OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.57-0.85). On Cox regression analysis, PAD was associated with a higher risk of the primary composite outcome (HR 1.28, 95%CI: 1.08-1.52) and all-cause death (HR 1.40, 95%CI: 1.16-1.69). A significant interaction was observed between PAD and age, with greater risks of PAD found in younger patients (<65 years) for the primary outcome (pint=0.014, Figure 2, panel A). Consistent results were observed when we analysed the interaction between PAD and age, modelled as a restricted cubic spline, where the risk of the primary outcome followed a J-curve across age, while patients without PAD showed an approximately linear relationship (pint<0.001, Figure 2, Panel B). Conclusions In patients with AF, PAD is associated with lower use of OAC and higher risk of adverse outcomes, with a greater risk seen in younger patients.Figure 1Figure 2

Impact of Peripheral Arterial Disease on Outcomes of Acute Coronary Syndrome

Impact of Peripheral Arterial Disease on Outcomes of Acute Coronary Syndrome

Peripheral artery disease in chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention.

The impact of peripheral artery disease (PAD) on the outcomes of chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is not well studied. We analyzed the association of PAD with CTO-PCI outcomes using data from the PROGRESS-CTO registry of procedures performed at 47 centers between 2012 and 2023. The prevalence of PAD among 12 961 patients who underwent CTO PCI during the study period was 13.9% (1802). PAD patients were older, more likely to be current smokers, and had higher rates of dyslipidemia, diabetes, cerebrovascular disease, hypertension, prior myocardial infarction, PCI, and coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Their PROGRESS-CTO (1.35 vs 1.22; P < .001) and J-CTO (2.63 vs 2.33; P < .001) scores were higher, lesion length was longer, and angiographic characteristics were more complex. Their access site was more likely to be bifemoral (33.6% vs 30.9%; P = .024) compared with patients with no PAD. Technical (82.9% vs 87.7%; P < .001) and procedural (80.5% vs 86.6%; P < .001) success rates were lower in patients with PAD, while the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) was higher (3.1% vs 1.8%; P < .001), with higher mortality (0.8% vs 0.4%; P = .034), acute myocardial infarction rate (0.9% vs 0.4%; P = .010), and perforations rate (6.6% vs 4.5%; P < .001). In multivariable analysis, PAD was associated with higher MACE (odds ratio [OR]: 1.53; 95% CI, 1.01-2.26; P = .038) and lower technical success (OR: 0.82; 95% CI, 0.69-0.99; P = .039). PAD patients undergoing CTO PCI have higher comorbidity burden, more complex CTOs, higher MACE, and lower technical success.

Uncertainty quantification of the impact of peripheral arterial disease on abdominal aortic aneurysms in blood flow simulations.

Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) and abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) often coexist and pose significant risks of mortality, yet their mutual interactions remain largely unexplored. Here, we introduce a fluid mechanics model designed to simulate the haemodynamic impact of PAD on AAA-associated risk factors. Our focus lies on quantifying the uncertainty inherent in controlling the flow rates within PAD-affected vessels and predicting AAA risk factors derived from wall shear stress. We perform a sensitivity analysis on nine critical model parameters through simulations of three-dimensional blood flow within a comprehensive arterial geometry. Our results show effective control of the flow rates using two-element Windkessel models, although specific outlets need attention. Quantities of interest like endothelial cell activation potential (ECAP) and relative residence time are instructive for identifying high-risk regions, with ECAP showing greater reliability and adaptability. Our analysis reveals that the uncertainty in the quantities of interest is 187% of that of the input parameters. Notably, parameters governing the amplitude and frequency of the inlet velocity exert the strongest influence on the risk factors' variability and warrant precise determination. This study forms the foundation for patient-specific simulations involving PAD and AAAs which should ultimately improve patient outcomes and reduce associated mortality rates.

Prognostic impact of peripheral artery disease in patients with and without high bleeding risk undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

Peripheral artery disease (PAD) is associated with worse outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The aim of this study was to assess the prognostic impact of PAD according to high bleeding risk (HBR) status. Consecutive patients undergoing PCI with drug-eluting stent implantation at a tertiary-care center (Mount Sinai Hospital) between 2012 and 2019 were stratified according to HBR and PAD status. The primary outcome was major adverse cardiac events (MACE), a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction (MI), and stroke 1 year after PCI. Secondary outcomes included major bleeding. Out of 16,750 patients, 43% were HBR and 57% were no-HBR. Within the two groups, PAD patients were 14% and 6%, respectively, and were more likely to have comorbidities and to undergo complex PCI than no-PAD patients. Within the HBR group, PAD was associated with an increased risk of MACE (11.4% vs. 7.3%, hazard ratio [HR]: 1.59, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.27-1.99, p < 0.001) and a numerical nonsignificant increase of major bleeding (8.5% vs. 6.9%, HR: 1.25, 95% CI: 0.98-1.59, p = 0.066) as compared with no-PAD. Among no-HBR patients, rates of MACE and major bleeding were numerically but not significantly higher in the PAD group. After multivariable adjustment, PAD was no longer a predictor of adverse outcomes, irrespective of HBR status. At 1-year after PCI, PAD was associated with increased 1-year risks of MACE in HBR patients. After adjustment for cardiovascular risk factors and comorbidities, the effect of PAD on adverse events was largely attenuated.

TCT-222 Impact of Peripheral Arterial Disease Among Patients Hospitalized for ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A U.S. Population-Based Cohort Study

TCT-222 Impact of Peripheral Arterial Disease Among Patients Hospitalized for ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A U.S. Population-Based Cohort Study

Impact of Peripheral Artery Disease on Bleeding Complications and Major Adverse Cardiac and Cerebrovascular Events During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Impact of Peripheral Artery Disease on Bleeding Complications and Major Adverse Cardiac and Cerebrovascular Events During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Outcomes of a multidisciplinary Diabetic Foot Day Unit

ObjectiveTo analyse the main characteristics of patients and the health outcomes obtained and to evaluate the impact of peripheral artery disease (PAD) in patients treated in our multidisciplinary Diabetic Foot Unit. Research design and methodsObservational prospective study. 273 patients from two different populations (with and without PAD – classified according to the presence of distal pulses) treated over a 14-month period in the multidisciplinary Diabetic Foot Unit were included. The data on patient characteristics and outcomes were analysed for the purpose of comparison. For the inference study, a comparison of medians with the non-parametric test for independent samples for the quantitative variables and a χ2 test for the comparison of proportions in qualitative variables were performed. ResultsPatients with PAD ulcers were older (60 (54–67) vs. 64 (75–81), p=0.000) and had a higher macrovascular burden (8.1% vs. 29% for ischaemic heart disease history, p=0.000; 6.7% vs. 18.1% for cerebrovascular disease history, p=0.004). Their Texas Score was higher (p=0.000) and their major amputation rate was higher (1.4% vs. 12.3%, p=0.001). They had less background of previous ulcers (52.6% vs. 26.8%, p=0.000), their episode duration was shorter (4 (0–10) vs. 0 (0–3) weeks, p=0.000), and their proportional need for antibiotic therapy was lower (64.4% vs. 51.4%, p=0.03). ConclusionsThe differences found between ulcers with and without vascular involvement support the need for a different approach and for the inclusion of vascular surgeons on the team. The multidisciplinary care model for diabetic foot patients could be effective and improve health outcomes.

CRT-100.47 Impact of Peripheral Artery Disease on Bleeding Complications and Major Adverse Cardiac and Cerebrovascular Events During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

CRT-100.47 Impact of Peripheral Artery Disease on Bleeding Complications and Major Adverse Cardiac and Cerebrovascular Events During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

The Independent Impact of Peripheral Arterial Disease on Mortality in Nonagenarians and Centenarians Who Were Treated in an Intensive Care Unit: A Consecutive Cohort of 1 108 Patients

To investigate the clinical characteristics, risk factors, and outcomes of inpatients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD) including lower extremity PAD, abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), and carotid artery disease in a large cohort of critically ill patients aged ≥ 90 years. A retrospective analysis was conducted of all adult patients aged ≥ 90 years consecutively admitted to the intensive care unit at a tertiary care centre in Hamburg, Germany, between 1 January 2008 and 30 April 2019. Multivariable regression and Kaplan-Meier methods were used to determine the independent impact of PAD on short and long term mortality endpoints. The analyses were adjusted for confounding by several sociodemographic and clinical parameters including Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) and established clinical risk scores. A total of 1 108 eligible patients were identified (92.3 years, 33% men). Of these, 24% had PAD (9% lower extremity PAD, 2% AAA, 15% coronary artery disease) and 76% did not have any history of PAD and were used as a comparison group. When compared with the comparison group, patients with PAD had a higher CCI (2 vs. 1, p < .001), more often had chronic kidney disease (28% vs. 21%, p= .019), and renal replacement therapy (5% vs. 2%, p= .016). Furthermore, they needed vasopressors (48% vs. 40%, p= .027) and parenteral nutrition (10% vs. 6%, p= .041) more often. After adjusting for confounding, PAD was independently associated with increased in hospital (hazard ratio [HR] 1.97, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.39 - 2.81, p < .001) and long term mortality rates (HR 1.32, 95% CI 1.05 - 1.66, p= .019). One of four critically ill nonagenarians and centenarians in an ICU in Germany had PAD. PAD was associated with both higher short and long term mortality rates while its impact outweighed higher age. Future studies should address this increasingly important population beyond 89 years of age.

Abstract 15310: Impact of Peripheral Artery Disease on Outcomes in High-Bleeding Risk Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Introduction: Peripheral artery disease (PAD) has been shown to be related to worse outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Little is known about the prognostic impact of PAD in patients with concomitant high bleeding risk (HBR) undergoing PCI. Hypothesis: The aim of this study was to assess ischemic and bleeding complications at 1 year after PCI in HBR patients with or without concomitant PAD. We hypothesized that in HBR patients with PAD, the risk of ischemic and, to a lesser extent, bleeding complications would be higher than in non-PAD patients. Methods: Consecutive patients undergoing PCI with drug-eluting stent implantation (DES) at a large tertiary-care center (Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, USA) between 2012 and 2019 and fulfilling the Academic Research Consortium HBR criteria were included. The primary outcome was major adverse cardiac events (MACE), a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction (MI) and stroke 1 year after PCI. The key secondary outcome was major bleeding, according to a study specific definition. Results: Out of 7,192 HBR patients, 975 (13.6%) had concomitant PAD. Compared to non-PAD patients, PAD patients were more likely to have cardiovascular risk factors and comorbidities and to undergo a complex PCI. MACE occurred in 93 (11.4%) patients with PAD and 382 (7.3%) without PAD. The increased risk of MACE (HR 1.59, 95% CI 1.27-1.99, p&lt;0.001) was mainly driven by an excess of all-cause death and MI in PAD patients ( Figure 1 ). Bleeding was observed in 80 (8.5%) PAD and 410 (6.9%) non-PAD patients (HR 1.25, 95% CI 0.98-1.59, p=0.066). Conclusions: Among HBR patients undergoing PCI with DES implantation, PAD was associated with a higher risk of MACE and a borderline increase in bleeding events.

Abstract 14328: The Impact of Peripheral Arterial Disease in Major Bleeding and Major Cardiac and Cerebrovascular Events in Patient Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Contemporary Assessment

Introduction: Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) has been associated with adverse outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, there are controversial reports regarding its impact in the current era of radial interventions. Hypothesis: We assessed the hypothesis that patients with PAD and patients without PAD undergoing PCI have similar major bleeding complications and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE). Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of data collected from 6 New York metropolitan area tertiary care hospitals and submitted to the NCDR between 2010 and 2018. Major bleeding events were classified using Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) classification. Severe bleeding was defined as a BARC ≥3. Hierarchical logistic regression was utilized to assess the association of PAD with post-PCI adverse outcomes, as appropriate. Results: A total of 2,933 PAD patients (9.4%) underwent PCI (without PAD, n = 28,172). Results are shown in the Table. PAD patients had a significantly higher odds of MACCE and major bleeding complications, including blood transfusions and in-hospital mortality. Access site bleeding and the need for post PCI dialysis did not reach statistical significance. A multivariable analysis will be presented. Conclusions: In conclusion, PAD continues to be a major risk factor for patients undergoing PCI. When compared with patients without PAD, these patients are at an increased risk of major adverse outcomes, including a 67% increase in mortality risk and a 44% in major bleeding complications risk.

Outcomes of a multidisciplinary Diabetic Foot Day Unit

ObjectiveTo analyse the main characteristics of patients and the health outcomes obtained and to evaluate the impact of peripheral artery disease (PAD) in patients treated in our multidisciplinary Diabetic Foot Unit. Research design and methodsObservational prospective study. 273 patients from two different populations (with and without PAD – classified according to the presence of distal pulses) treated over a 14-month period in the multidisciplinary Diabetic Foot Unit were included. The data on patient characteristics and outcomes were analysed for the purpose of comparison. For the inference study, a comparison of medians with the non-parametric test for independent samples for the quantitative variables and a χ2 test for the comparison of proportions in qualitative variables were performed. ResultsPatients with PAD ulcers were older (60 (54–67) vs. 64 (75–81), p=0.000) and had a higher macrovascular burden (8.1% vs. 29% for ischaemic heart disease history, p=0.000; 6.7% vs. 18.1% for cerebrovascular disease history, p=0.004). Their Texas Score was higher (p=0.000) and their major amputation rate was higher (1.4% vs. 12.3%, p=0.001). They had less background of previous ulcers (52.6% vs. 26.8%, p=0.000), their episode duration was shorter (4 (0–10) vs. 0 (0–3) weeks, p=0.000), and their proportional need for antibiotic therapy was lower (64.4% vs. 51.4%, p=0.03). ConclusionsThe differences found between ulcers with and without vascular involvement support the need for a different approach and for the inclusion of vascular surgeons on the team. The multidisciplinary care model for diabetic foot patients could be effective and improve health outcomes.

Impact of peripheral artery disease on prognosis after percutaneous coronary intervention: Outcomes from the multicenter prospective e-ULTIMASTER registry

Background and aimsPatients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) represent a high risk group, and have an increased risk of cardiovascular events and worse cardiovascular outcomes. Our aim was to study the impact of PAD among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with a newer-generation thin-strut DES. MethodsIn this analysis of the e‐ULTIMASTER registry, patients with and without known PAD undergoing PCI were compared. A propensity-score was used to adjust for differences between the groups. The primary outcome was target lesion failure (TLF): a composite of cardiac death, target‐vessel related myocardial infarction, and/or clinically driven target lesion revascularization at 1‐year follow‐up. ResultsOf 33,880 patients included in the analysis, PAD was present in 2255 (6.7%). Patients with PAD were older (69.0 ± 10.0 vs. 63.8 ± 11.3 years) with a higher burden of comorbidities. Patients with PAD were less likely to present with STEMI (9.6% vs. 21%), and more likely to undergo complex PCI (left main 5.5% vs. 3.0% ostial lesions 10.4% vs. 7.0%, bifurcations 14.5% vs. 12.3% and calcification 26.8% vs. 17.8%). PAD was found to be independently associated with 41% increased risk for TLF. The risk for all cause death and for cardiac death was 75% and 103% higher, respectably. No difference was found in the rates of stent thrombosis, clinically driven target lesion revascularization, or myocardial infarction (MI). ConclusionsPatients with PAD are at higher risk for (cardiac) death post PCI, but not target vessel or lesion repeat revascularizations. The PAD cohort represents a population with a higher risk clinical profile. Further research combining medical and device therapies is needed to further improve the outcomes in this high-risk population.

Peripheral Artery Disease on The Prognosis Value of Patients with Stable Coronary Artery Disease Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Retrospective, Single-Center Cohort Study.

The purpose of this investigation aimed to clarify the impact of peripheral artery disease (PAD) on the prognosis value of patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD) who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The SPSS 16 software was used for secondary analysis of DRYAD database data. A total of 204 patients were enrolled from Shinonoi General Hospital for newly diagnosed stable CAD and received PCI performance between October 2014 and October 2017. Patients with old myocardial infarction (MI) were excluded. We divided patients into two groups with PAD and without PAD. The primary endpoints were major adverse cardiac events (MACE, defined as all-cause death, non-fatal MI, and non-fatal stroke) and cardiovascular events (defined as cardiovascular death, non-fatal MI, and non-fatal stroke). The secondary outcomes were the individual components of the composite primary outcomes. The median follow-up time was 783 days. No statistical difference was found between PAD and non-PAD patients of lesional characteristics. Spearman's rank correlations indicate diabetes mellitus (DM) (P = 0.019) and HbA1c (P = 0.009) are positively correlated with PAD. In Kaplan-Meier analysis, patients with PAD predicted poor prognosis in MACE (P < 0.05) and cardiovascular events (P < 0.05). In Multivariable Cox proportional hazards analysis, patients with PAD independently predicted MACE and cardiovascular events. PAD is a significant mediator for the prognosis of patients with stable CAD who underwent PCI treatment.

The impact of peripheral artery disease on major adverse cardiovascular events following myocardial infarction

AimsPeripheral artery disease (PAD) constitute a high-risk with adverse clinical outcomes. We aimed to investigate the cardiovascular outcomes following myocardial infarction (MI). Methods and resultsThis nationwide, Danish register-based follow-up study includes all patients experiencing an MI between 2000 and 2017. Patients with and without PAD were compared. Multivariable logistic regression was used to derive relative risks of 1-year major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE; all-cause mortality, reinfarction, stroke or heart failure). Individual components, cardiovascular mortality, and bleeding, standardized to age, sex and comorbidity distributions of all patients were assessed. MI patients with PAD (n = 5083, 2.9%) were older and more comorbid compared to patients without PAD (n = 174,673). After standardization, PAD was associated with higher 1-year relative risks of MACE (RR 1.21 [95% CI 1.17;1.25]), all-cause (RR 1.29 [95% CI 1.24;1.35]) and cardiovascular mortality (RR 1.3 [95% CI 1.24;1.36]), reinfarction (RR 1.17 [95% CI 1.11;1.22]), stroke (RR 1.12 [95% CI 0.92;1.32]), heart failure (RR 1.22 [95% CI 1.12;1.32]), and bleeding episodes (RR 1.25 [95% CI 1.04,1.46]). Similar results were seen in 30-day survivors after adjustment for antithrombotic post-discharge medication for MACE (RR 1.25 [95% CI 1.20,1.31]), all-cause mortality (RR 1.47 [95% CI 1.37,1.57], cardiovascular mortality (RR 1.49 [95% CI 1.37,1.61]), reinfarction (RR 1.17 [95% CI 1.08,1.12]) and heart failure (RR 1.22 [95% CI 1.12,1.32]). ConclusionComparing to patients without PAD, patients with PAD had increased 1-year relative risk of MACE, all-cause mortality, reinfarction, stroke, heart failure, cardiovascular mortality and bleeding following MI. The low prevalence of PAD is suggestive of considerable under-diagnosing.

The Impact of Peripheral Artery Disease (PAD) on Lower Limb Kinematics in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.

BACKGROUNDPeripheral artery disease (PAD) and diabetes mellitus are factors known to influence gait characteristics. However, there is a lack of knowledge on the extent to which type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) and PAD as comorbidities cause limb and gait complications.AIMThe purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of PAD as a complication of T2D on ankle joint dorsiflexion and knee joint flexion angles using an optoelectronic motion analysis system and to find out whether these alterations are complications secondary to neuropathy or reduced blood perfusion.METHODSNinety participants were recruited in this quantitative study which applied a prospective, comparative, non-experimental approach. Participants with T2D and PAD (n = 60), categorized according to the severity of PAD (mild and severe group), were compared with a control group consisting of patients with T2D alone. An optoelectronic motion capture system was used to record mean maximum flexion angles of the knee joint and maximum mean dorsiflexion angles of the ankle joint during gait.RESULTS180 limbs were analyzed. Both mild and severe PAD participants exhibited a significant increase in mean maximum ankle joint dorsiflexion angles (p = 0.001) and a significant decrease in mean maximum flexion of the knee joint compared with the control subjects (p = 0.001).CONCLUSIONSThis study shows that T2D and PAD alter ankle joint and knee joint kinematics. This research provides biomechanical understanding of limb and gait alterations in this specific patient population which may contribute to an improved understanding of gait alterations and clinical management. The findings suggest that the reduction in ankle joint dorsiflexion commonly attributed to glycosylation in diabetes may be secondary to neuropathy and not to reduced blood perfusion.

The impact of peripheral arterial disease on left ventricular assist device implantation: A propensity-matched analysis of the nationwide inpatient sample database.

Left ventricular assist device (LVAD) candidacy screening includes evaluation for peripheral arterial disease (PAD). However, given current evidence, the impact of PAD on post-LVAD complications remains unknown. The National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database (2002-2017) was utilized to identify all LVAD cases. The in-hospital safety endpoints included major cardiovascular adverse events and its components. A propensity-matched analysis was used to obtain adjusted odds ratios (aOR). A subgroup analysis of patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) with PAD was also performed. A total of 27 424 patients with LVAD implantation (PAD: 516 [1.8%] and no-PAD 26908 [98.2%]) were included. There were significant intergroup differences in the demographics and baseline comorbidities. A weighted sample of 1053 (no-PAD 537, PAD 516) propensity-matched population was selected. The adjusted odds for in-hospital mortality (aOR 1.7; 95% CI, 1.2-2.44, P=.004) were found to be significantly higher for LVAD-patients with PAD. There was no significant difference in the adjusted odds of MACE (aOR 1.16, 95% CI 0.87-1.5), postprocedure bleeding (aOR 0.88, 95% CI 0.62-1.26, P=.54) and risk of pneumonia (aOR 0.67, 95% CI 0.44-1.15, P=.63) between the two groups. A selected cohort of DM-only population (7339) consistently showed a higher adjusted mortality rate in PAD patients with LVAD implantation (aOR 2.3, 95% CI 1.2-4.47, P=.01). The rate of MACE (P=.17), myocardial infarction (P=.12), stroke (P=.60), postprocedural (0.10), and major bleeding (P=.51) remained identical between patients with PAD and those with no-PAD. PAD confers an increased risk of in-hospital all-cause mortality in patients undergoing LVAD implantation. This risk increases further in patients with a concomitant diagnosis of DM.

The Impact of Peripheral Arterial Disease on Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation a Propensity Matched Analysis of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample Database

<h3>Purpose</h3> Left ventricular assist device (LVAD) candidacy screening includes evaluation for peripheral arterial disease (PVD). However, given current evidence, the impact of PAD on post-LVAD complications remains unknown. <h3>Methods</h3> The National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database (2002-2017) was utilized to identify all LVAD cases. The in-hospital safety endpoints included major cardiovascular adverse events (MACE) and its components. A propensity-matched analysis was used to obtain adjusted odds ratios (aOR). A subgroup analysis of patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) with PAD was also performed. <h3>Results</h3> A total of 27424 patients with LVAD implantation [PAD: 516 (1.8%) and no-PAD 26908 (98.2%)] were included. There were significant intergroup differences in the demographics and baseline comorbidities. A weighted sample of 1053 (no-PAD 537, PAD 516) propensity-matched population was selected. The adjusted odds for in-hospital mortality (aOR 1.7; 95% CI, 1.2-2.44, P=0.004) were found to be significantly higher for LVAD-patients with PAD. There was no significant difference in the adjusted odds of MACE (aOR 1.16, 95% CI 0.87-1.5), post-procedure bleeding (aOR 0.88, 95% CI 0.62-1.26, P=0.54) and risk of pneumonia (aOR 0.67, 95% CI 0.44-1.15, P=0.63) between the two groups.(Figure) A selected cohort of DM-only population (7339) consistently showed a higher adjusted mortality rate in PAD patients with LVAD implantation (aOR 2.3, 95% CI 1.2-4.47, p=0.01). The rate of MACE (p=0.17), myocardial infarction (p=0.12), stroke (p=0.60), post-procedural (0.10) and major bleeding (p=0.51) remained identical between patients with PAD and those with no-PAD. <h3>Conclusion</h3> PAD confers an increased risk of in-hospital all-cause mortality in patients undergoing LVAD implantation. This risk increases further in patients with a concomitant diagnosis of DM.

Multifaceted needs of individuals living with peripheral arterial disease: A qualitative study

To ascertain a comprehensive perspective of the impact of peripheral arterial disease (PAD) on people including needs for access to disease specific information, education, services, and support. Participants were recruited from outpatient clinics at a tertiary hospital in metropolitan Australia. Telephone and face-to-face semi-structured interviews were conducted with nine individuals living with PAD and analysed using qualitative content thematic analysis. The nine participants were on average 74.2 (SD 10.9) years and predominantly women (67%). Lack of understanding of PAD and inconsistent information resulted in confusion regarding self-management strategies. Effects of pain and mobility problems were amplified for participants who lived alone and did not have an informal carer. Poor quality of life in PAD reflects pain, social isolation and fear of falls. Multidisciplinary teams with case managers should consider older people's living situations and needs for additional support services and education to facilitate integrated care.