Impact Of Long-acting Injectable Antipsychotics Research Articles

Impact of long-acting injectable antipsychotics vs. oral medication on relapses of patients with psychosis and bipolar disorder

Relapse associated with multiple hospital readmissions of patients with chronic and severe mental disorders, such as psychosis and bipolar disorder, is frequently associated with non-adherence to treatment. The primary aim of the study was to compare the effectiveness of long-acting injectable (LAI) treatment, vs. oral medication in reducing readmissions of patients with psychotic or bipolar disorder in a community sample of 164 patients with psychosis and 29 patients with bipolar disorder (n = 193), with poor adherence to oral medication. The mean follow up period was 5.6 years and the number of readmissions were compared for an equal-length period of oral treatment preceding the onset of LAI administration. We observed a significant decrease of 45.2 % in total hospital readmissions after receiving LAIs treatment. The effect was significant both for patients with a pre-LAI treatment history of predominantly voluntary hospitalizations and with predominantly involuntary admissions. In addition, we observed equal effectiveness of first- vs. second-generation LAIs in reducing total hospital readmissions regardless of type of pre-treatment admission history (voluntary vs. involuntary). LAIs appear to be effective in reducing both voluntary and involuntary hospital readmissions in patients with psychosis and bipolar disorder with a history of poor adherence to treatment.

Clinical and economic impact of long-acting injectable antipsychotics in patients previously treated with short-acting oral antipsychotics.

BACKGROUND: Available literature supports the use of long-acting injectable (LAI) antipsychotics over short-acting oral (SAO) formulations. The majority of evidence is centered on patients with schizophrenia insured under the Medicaid benefit. OBJECTIVE: To assess real-world clinical and economic outcomes of LAI compared with SAO antipsychotics in patients with psychiatric conditions insured under commercial, health care exchange, or Medicare plans. METHODS: In this exploratory treatmenteffectiveness study, a retrospective, before and after study design was used to evaluate differences in clinical and economic outcomes in patients switching from SAO to LAI antipsychotics. Patients who had at least 1 claim for an LAI antipsychotic and a psychiatric diagnosis were considered eligible for the study if they were continuously enrolled in a commercial, health care exchange, or Medicare plan for 12 months before (preperiod) and 12 months after (postperiod) their first LAI antipsychotic claim. During the preperiod, patients were required to have filled at least a 30-day supply of any SAO antipsychotic medication. Clinical outcomes included health care resource utilization (eg, hospitalizations per member per year [PMPY]), adherence measures, and medication switch trends. Economic outcomes included total per member per month (PMPM) spending across the medical benefit alone, the pharmacy benefit alone, and the combined spending across both benefits. Additionally, we examined patient costs and health plan spending within each of these categories. RESULTS: There was a significant decrease in overall hospitalizations PMPY (1.80 vs 0.88; P < 0.001) and psychiatric hospitalizations PMPY (0.65 vs 0.20; P <0.001) when comparing patients treated with SAO antipsychotics in the preperiod to the same patients treated with LAI antipsychotics in the postperiod, respectively. No differences were observed in the percentage of days covered with SAO and LAI agents (87.4% vs 85.8%; P=0.312). More patients switched between SAO antipsychotics during the preperiod, as compared with the number who switched between LAI antipsychotics during the postperiod (57.4% vs 10.3%; P < 0.001). On average, patients switched medications sooner in the preperiod vs the postperiod (114.50 vs 211.26 days; P < 0.001). No difference was observed between the preperiod and postperiod in total spending PMPM ($3,798.76 vs $3,702.63; P = 0.826) CONCLUSIONS: Patients switching from SAO to LAI antipsychotics experienced fewer hospitalizations, with no change in overall spending. Adherence was similar, though fewer medication switches occurred and there was a longer time before switching medications with LAI compared with SAO antipsychotics DISCLOSURES: Funding for this study was provided by Highmark Inc., but the sponsor had no role in the study outside the final review of the submitted manuscript.

Hospitalizations and emergency room visits after initiation of long-acting injectable antipsychotics.

Introduction:Long-acting injectable antipsychotics (LAIs) serve as a means to ensure medication adherence with the intention of improving outcomes for psychiatric patients. Evidence remains inconclusive regarding the impact of LAIs on relapses and psychiatric hospitalizations rates.Methods:The primary objective of this retrospective pre/post study was to determine whether initiating an LAI in a veteran population with schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, or bipolar disorder is associated with a decrease in the 1-year rate of psychiatric hospitalizations and emergency room (ER) visits.Results:For the combined primary endpoint, the 1-year rate of psychiatric hospitalizations and ER visits for patients with schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, or bipolar disorder was not significantly reduced after initiation of LAIs (n = 50, median [interquartile range]: 1.5 [1, 3] to 1 [0, 3], P = .055). However, the secondary endpoint of the 1-year rate of psychiatric hospitalizations was reduced (1 [0, 3] to 0 [0, 2], P = .026). Additionally, for those who received injections on a regular basis, the 1-year rate of hospitalizations and ER visits was significantly reduced (2 [1, 3] to 0 [0, 1.5], P = .009).Discussion:This retrospective study suggests that the initiation of LAIs is associated with a reduced rate of psychiatric hospitalizations as well as a reduced rate of psychiatric hospitalizations and ER visits for those patients who receive injections on a regular basis.

Impact of long-acting injectable antipsychotics on the illness progression in schizophrenia

Several data suggest an association between repeated psychotic episodes in patients with schizophrenia and poor outcomes on the course of the illness, including worse psychosocial functioning and quality of life, deterioration and stigma. However, there is strong evidence showing antipsychotic efficacy for relapse prevention in chronic and first-episode patients. Non-adherence and partial adherence to antipsychotic treatment is a common feature that has been detected in half or more patients with schizophrenia. The use of long-acting injectable antipsychotics (LAIs) is a valuable treatment option in order to prevent non-adherence rates and the risk of relapse in patients with schizophrenia. Nevertheless, LAIs are an underutilized, yet efficacious, treatment option. This underutilization is due, at least in part, to patients and clinicians reluctance to use LAIs because of needle pain, time constraints, stigmatization, and cost. However, results from recent meta-analytic evidences including randomized control trials (RCTs) are in contrast with those from naturalistic cohort studies or mirror-image studies in showing superiority of LAIs versus oral antipsychotics (OAPs) in preventing relapse in patients with schizophrenia. After a review of updated data, guidance will be offered concerning the appropriate use of LAIs in patients with schizophrenia.

Impact of long-acting injectable antipsychotics on medication adherence and clinical, functional, and economic outcomes of schizophrenia

Schizophrenia is a debilitating chronic disease that requires lifelong medical care and supervision. Even with treatment, the majority of patients relapse within 5 years, and suicide may occur in up to 10% of patients. Poor adherence to oral antipsychotics is the most common cause of relapse. The discontinuation rate for oral antipsychotics in schizophrenia ranges from 26% to 44%, and as many as two-thirds of patients are at least partially nonadherent, resulting in increased risk of hospitalization. A very helpful approach to improve adherence in schizophrenia is the use of long-acting injectable (LAI) antipsychotics, although only a minority of patients receive these. Reasons for underutilization may include negative attitudes, perceptions, and beliefs of both patients and health care professionals. Research shows, however, significant improvements in adherence with LAIs compared with oral drugs, and this is accompanied by lower rates of discontinuation, relapse, and hospitalization. In addition, LAIs are associated with better functioning, quality of life, and patient satisfaction. A need exists to encourage broader LAI use, especially among patients with a history of nonadherence with oral antipsychotics. This paper reviews the impact of nonadherence with antipsychotic drug therapy overall, as well as specific outcomes of the schizophrenia patient, and highlights the potential benefits of LAIs.