Impact Of Empirical Antibiotic Therapy Research Articles

Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bloodstream Infections Presenting with Septic Shock in Neutropenic Cancer Patients: Impact of Empirical Antibiotic Therapy.

This large, multicenter, retrospective cohort study including onco-hematological neutropenic patients with Pseudomonas aeruginosa bloodstream infection (PABSI) found that among 1213 episodes, 411 (33%) presented with septic shock. The presence of solid tumors (33.3% vs. 20.2%, p < 0.001), a high-risk Multinational Association for Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) index score (92.6% vs. 57.4%; p < 0.001), pneumonia (38% vs. 19.2% p < 0.001), and infection due to multidrug-resistant P. aeruginosa (MDRPA) (33.8% vs. 21.1%, p < 0.001) were statistically significantly higher in patients with septic shock compared to those without. Patients with septic shock were more likely to receive inadequate empirical antibiotic therapy (IEAT) (21.7% vs. 16.2%, p = 0.020) and to present poorer outcomes, including a need for ICU admission (74% vs. 10.5%; p < 0.001), mechanical ventilation (49.1% vs. 5.6%; p < 0.001), and higher 7-day and 30-day case fatality rates (58.2% vs. 12%, p < 0.001, and 74% vs. 23.1%, p < 0.001, respectively). Risk factors for 30-day case fatality rate in patients with septic shock were orotracheal intubation, IEAT, infection due to MDRPA, and persistent PABSI. Therapy with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and BSI from the urinary tract were associated with improved survival. Carbapenems were the most frequent IEAT in patients with septic shock, and the use of empirical combination therapy showed a tendency towards improved survival. Our findings emphasize the need for tailored management strategies in this high-risk population.

The Impact of Early Antibiotic Use on Clinical Outcomes of Patients Hospitalized with COVID-19: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.

Early empiric antibiotics were prescribed to numerous patients during the Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. However, the potential impact of empiric antibiotic therapy on the clinical outcomes of patients hospitalized with COVID-19 is yet unknown. In this retrospective cohort study, early antibiotics use cohort was defined as control group, which was compared with no antibiotic use and delayed antibiotic use cohorts for all-cause mortality during hospitalization. The 1:2 propensity score matched patient populations were further developed to adjust confounding factors. Survival curves were compared between different cohorts using a Log rank test to assess the early antibiotic effectiveness. We included a total of 1472 COVID-19 hospitalized patients, of whom 87.4% (1287 patients) received early antibiotic prescriptions. In propensity-score-matched datasets, our analysis comprised 139 patients with non-antibiotic use (with 278 matched controls) and 27 patients with deferred-antibiotic use (with 54 matched controls). Patients with older ages, multiple comorbidities, severe and critical COVID-19 subtypes, higher serum infection indicators, and inflammatory indicators at admission were more likely to receive early antibiotic prescriptions. After adjusting confounding factors likely to influence the prognosis, there is no significant difference in all-cause mortality (HR=1.000(0.246-4.060), p = 1.000) and ICU admission (HR=0.436(0.093-2.04), p = 0.293), need for mechanical ventilation (HR=0.723(0.296-1.763), p = 0.476) and tracheal intubation (HR=1.338(0.221-8.103), p = 0.751) were observed between early antibiotics use cohort and non-antibiotic use cohort. Early antibiotics were frequently prescribed to patients in more severe disease condition at admission. However, early antibiotic treatment failed to demonstrate better clinical outcomes in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 in the propensity-score-matched cohorts.

Impact of empiric antibiotic therapy on the clinical outcome of acute calculous cholecystitis

PurposeAlthough mortality and morbidity of severe acute calculous cholecystitis (ACC) are still a matter of concern, the impact of inadequate empirical antibiotic therapy has been poorly studied as a risk factor. The objective was to assess the impact of the adequacy of empirical antibiotic therapy on complication and mortality rates in ACC.MethodsThis observational retrospective cohort chart-based single-center study was conducted between 2012 and 2016. A total of 963 consecutive patients were included, and pure ACC was selected. General, clinical, postoperative, and microbiological variables were collected, and risk factors and consequences of inadequate treatment were analyzed.ResultsBile, blood, and/or exudate cultures were obtained in 76.3% of patients, more often in old, male, and severely ill patients (P < 0.001). Patients who were cultured had a higher overall rate of postoperative complications (47.4% vs. 29.7%; P < 0.001), as well as of severe complications (11.6% vs. 4.7%; P = 0.008). Patients with positive cultures had more overall complications (54.8% vs. 39.6%; P = 0.001), more severe complications (16.3% vs. 6.7%; P = 0.001), and higher mortality rates (6% vs. 1.9%; P = 0.012). Patients who received inadequate empirical antibiotic therapy had a fourfold higher mortality rate than those receiving adequate therapy (n = 283; 12.8% vs. 3.4%; P = 0.003). This association was especially marked in severe ACC TG–III patients (n = 132; 18.2 vs. 5.1%; P = 0.018) and remained a predictor of mortality in a binary logistic regression (OR 4.4; 95% CI 1.3–15.3).ConclusionPatients with positive cultures developed more complications and faced higher mortality. Adequate empirical antibiotic therapy appears to be of paramount importance in ACC, particularly in severely ill patients.

Impact of Empirical Antibiotic Therapy on Outcomes of Outpatient Urinary Tract Infection Due to Nonsusceptible Enterobacterales.

ABSTRACTResistance to oral antibiotics commonly used to treat outpatient urinary tract infections (UTIs) is increasing, but the implications of empirical treatment of resistant pathogens are not well described. Using an electronic records database, we reviewed the outcomes of patients >18 years of age who developed an outpatient UTI and had an outpatient urine culture result showing a member of the order Enterobacterales along with prescription data for an oral antibiotic filled on the day before, day of, or day after the culture was collected. Linear probability models were used to estimate partial effects of select clinical and demographic variables on the composite outcome. In all, 4,792 patients had 5,587 oral antibiotic prescriptions. Of 5,395 evaluable episodes, 22% of patients received an antibiotic to which the pathogen was resistant in vitro, and those patients were almost twice as likely to require a second prescription (34% versus 19%) or be hospitalized (15% versus 8%) within 28 days of the initial prescription fill compared to patients who received an antibiotic to which the pathogen was susceptible. Approximately 1% of Enterobacterales isolates were resistant to all commonly available classes of oral antibiotics. A greater risk of treatment failure was seen in patients over 60 years of age, patients with diabetes mellitus, men, and those treated with an antibiotic when prior culture identified an organism resistant to that class. The increasing resistance among members of Enterobacterales responsible for outpatient UTIs is limiting the effectiveness of empirical treatment with existing antibiotics, and consequently, outpatients with UTI are more likely to require additional courses of therapy or be hospitalized.IMPORTANCE Resistance rates for bacteria that cause urinary tract infections (UTIs) have increased dramatically. Regional rates of resistance to commonly prescribed antibiotics now exceed 20%, which is the threshold at which the Infectious Diseases Society of America recommends therapy be guided by culture. Our goals were to describe outcomes for outpatients with UTIs caused by bacteria resistant to empirically chosen antibiotics and to create a simple stratification schema for clinicians to identify UTI patients at increased risk of treatment failure due to antibiotic mismatch. These data are relevant to clinicians, given how common uncomplicated UTIs are, and highlight the need for clinicians to understand local resistance rates and the importance of culture-guided treatment, especially in vulnerable patients. These findings also showed that 1% of bacteria were resistant to all major classes of oral antibiotics, underscoring the need for new antibiotics to treat patients with UTIs due to resistant bacteria.

Impact of Empirical Antibiotic Therapy on the 28-Day Mortality of SARS-CoV-2 Patients with Sepsis

Impact of Empirical Antibiotic Therapy on the 28-Day Mortality of SARS-CoV-2 Patients with Sepsis

Clinical Impact of Empirical Antibiotic Therapy in Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019 Requiring Oxygen Therapy.

Despite the low prevalence of secondary bacterial infection in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients, most of them were administered antibiotic therapy empirically. However, the prognostic impact of empirical antibiotic therapy has not been evaluated. We conducted retrospective propensity score-matched case-control study of 233 COVID-19 patients with moderate to severe illnesses who required oxygen therapy and evaluated whether empirical antibiotic therapy could improve clinical outcomes. Empirical antibiotic therapy did not improve clinical outcomes including length of stay, days with oxygen requirement, the proportion of patients with increased oxygen demand, the proportion of patients who required mechanical ventilation, and overall mortality. This finding implies that routine administration of antibiotics for the treatment of COVID-19 is not essential and should be restricted.

Adherence to Treatment Guideline Improves Patient Outcomes in a Prospective Cohort of Adults Hospitalized for Community-Acquired Pneumonia.

BackgroundUnderstanding local epidemiology and etiologies of community-acquired pneumonia in hospitalized patients is crucial for determining the appropriateness of treatment guidelines. We aim to determine the etiologies, severity, and outcomes in adults hospitalized for community-acquired pneumonia and to study the impact of empirical antibiotic therapy on patient outcomes.MethodsWe performed a prospective observational cohort study involving adults hospitalized for community-acquired pneumonia in Hong Kong. Sputum, nasopharyngeal aspirate, blood, and urine were collected for bacterial culture, molecular tests for detection of viruses and atypical pathogens, and antigen tests. Multivariable logistic regression model and Cox proportional hazard models were performed to determine independent factors associated with prolonged hospitalization and mortality.ResultsFrom February 2017 to July 2018, 258 patients were enrolled. The median age was 73 (interquartile range, 61–80) years, 66% were male, 57% had underlying chronic illnesses, 13% had CURB-65 score ≥3, and 10% had higher 1-year mortality. Pathogens were identified in 45% of patients; 20% had viral, 15% had bacterial, and 9% had polymicrobial pneumonia. Streptococcus pneumoniae (12%), influenza virus (12%), and Mycoplasma pneumoniae (1.2%) were the most common bacterial, viral, and atypical pathogens, respectively. Nonadherence to local empirical antibiotic treatment guidelines (primarily recommending beta-lactam and doxycycline) was observed in 25% and was independently associated with prolonged hospitalization (≥7 days) and higher mortality, after adjustment for age, underlying chronic illness, and disease severity.ConclusionsAdherence to treatment guidelines was associated with shorter hospitalization and improved survival. We provided evidence for the use of doxycycline for coverage of atypical pathogens in nonsevere pneumonia.

The relationship between clinical outcomes and empirical antibiotic therapy in patients with community-onset Gram-negative bloodstream infections: a cohort study from a large teaching hospital.

Antibiotic-resistant Gram-negative bacteraemias (GNB) are increasing in incidence. We aimed to investigate the impact of empirical antibiotic therapy on clinical outcomes by carrying out an observational 6-year cohort study of patients at a teaching hospital with community-onset Escherichia coli bacteraemia (ECB), Klebsiella pneumoniae bacteraemia (KPB) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteraemia (PsAB). Antibiotic therapy was considered concordant if the organism was sensitive in vitro and discordant if resistant. We estimated the association between concordant vs. discordant empirical antibiotic therapy on odds of in-hospital death and ICU admission for KPB and ECB. Of 1380 patients, 1103 (79.9%) had ECB, 189 (13.7%) KPB and 88 (6.4%) PsAB. Discordant therapy was not associated with increased odds of either outcome. For ECB, severe illness and non-urinary source were associated with increased odds of both outcomes (OR of in-hospital death for non-urinary source 3.21, 95% CI 1.73-5.97). For KPB, discordant therapy was associated with in-hospital death on univariable but not multivariable analysis. Illness severity was associated with increased odds of both outcomes. These findings suggest broadening of therapy for low-risk patients with community-onset GNB is not warranted. Future research should focus on the relationship between patient outcomes, clinical factors, infection focus and causative organism and resistance profile.

Community-acquired pneumonia: impact of empirical antibiotic therapy without respiratory fluoroquinolones nor third-generation cephalosporins.

Guidelines for inpatients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) propose to use respiratory fluoroquinolone (RFQ) and/or third-generation cephalosporins (Ceph-3). However, broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy is associated with the emergence of drug-resistant bacteria. We established a guideline in which RFQ and Ceph-3 were excluded as a first course. Our aim was to evaluate the impact of our therapeutic choices for CAP on the length of hospital stay (LOS) and patient outcome. This was a cohort study of patients with CAP from July 2005 to June 2014. We compared patients benefiting from our guideline established in 2008 to those receiving non-consensual antibiotics. Disease severity was evaluated through the Pneumonia Severity Index (PSI). The empirical treatment for PSI III to V was a combination therapy of amoxicillin-clavulanic acid (AMX-C) + roxithromycin (RX) or AMX + ofloxacin. Adherence to guidelines was defined by the prescription of one of these antibiotic agents. Requirement for intensive care or death defined unfavorable outcome. Among 1,370 patients, 847 were treated according to our guideline (61.8%, group 1) and 523 without concordant therapy (38.2%, group 2). The mean PSI was similar: 82 vs. 83, p > 0.5. The mean LOS was lower in group 1: 7.6days vs. 9.1 days, p < 0.001. An unfavorable outcome was less frequent in group 1: 5.4% vs. 9.9%, p = 0.001. In logistic regression models, concordant therapy was associated with a favorable outcome: adjusted odds ratio (AOR) [95 % confidence interval (CI)] 1.85 [1.20-2.88], p = 0.005. CAP therapy without RFQ and Ceph-3 use was associated with a shorter LOS and fewer unfavorable outcomes.

Epidemiology of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection and empirical antibiotic therapy for MRSA infection: multicenter investigation

Background The epidemiology of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) maybe changed by strict infection control measures, and the impact of empirical antibiotic therapy on the outcomes of MRSA infection was not clear. We aimed to investigate the present epidemiological status of MRSA infection and empirical antibiotic therapy for MRSA infection in university teaching hospitals in mainland China. Methods The present study was a multicenter prospective observational study conducted in five university teaching hospitals. Patients who were consecutively admitted to the intensive care unit and signed a consent form from March 3, 2011 to May 31, 2011 were included. Patients with age &lt;18 years or with a length of hospital stay &lt;48 hours were excluded from this study. The following variables were collected or recorded: demographic data, general status, APACHE II score of the patient at the time of admission, infections, and the use of antibiotics during a stay. Primary outcomes and prognostic indicators included length of hospital stay and 28-day and 90-day mortality. The differences between the patients with appropriate empirical therapy and patients with inappropriate therapy were analyzed to detect the influences of antibiotic therapy on the prognosis of MRSA infection. Results A total of 682 cases were enrolled. Thirty (66.2%) of 88 MRSA cases were treated with effective antibiotics for MRSA infection; only 20% received appropriate empirical antibiotic treatment. The empirical therapy group compared with the target therapy group had a shorter length of stay, but there were no significant differences in mortality rates. There were no significant differences in the length of hospital stay, length of stay, and 28-day and 90-day mortality between MRSA-infected patients who received or not received effective antibiotics. Two hundred and eighteen cases received sensitive antibiotics for MRSA. Conclusions The MRSA infection rates are at relatively low levels in university teaching hospitals in China. The empirical use of sensitive antibiotics for MRSA infection was at relatively high rate, and there is a tendency of overusing in patients without MRSA infection. On the other hand, the rate of appropriate empirical antibiotic therapy for patients with MRSA infection is relatively low.

Impact of empirical antibiotic therapy and mortality in the elderly with septic shock

Impact of empirical antibiotic therapy and mortality in the elderly with septic shock