Impact Of Antimicrobial Stewardship Interventions Research Articles

P02 Evaluating the impact of antimicrobial stewardship interventions in a UK paediatric emergency department

P02 Evaluating the impact of antimicrobial stewardship interventions in a UK paediatric emergency department

Point Prevalence Survey of Antimicrobial Prescription and Consumption in a Nigerian Tertiary Hospital: A Gateway to the Antimicrobial Stewardship Program

Background: Antimicrobial stewardship is an important action plan for curbing the rising trend of antimicrobial resistance (AMR). Surveillance of antimicrobial use and consumption is needed as baseline data and for monitoring the impact of antimicrobial stewardship interventions. The survey was done to understand the burden of AMR, in view of establishing an antimicrobial stewardship program in our hospital. Methods: A point prevalence survey (PPS) of antimicrobial use and consumption was conducted on all inpatients admitted before 8.00 am on the days of the survey using a standardized questionnaire. The collected data were entered online into the Global PPS web-based application (www.global-pps.com), for analysis. Result: Of the 178 patients admitted during the survey period, 50.6% were on one or more antimicrobial agents. All the patients in adult intensive care units were on antibiotics (100%), followed by neonatal intensive care units (83.3%), with the least being adult medical wards (39.4%). Beta-lactam antibiotics were the most frequently prescribed antimicrobial for various infections, especially skin and soft tissue infections, 41.3%, which were the most common diagnoses treated with antibiotics. The infection was mostly community-acquired (81.6%), of which 94.9% were treated empirically. There was no written guideline in existence. Conclusion: The present study revealed a poor prescribing habit because of a high rate of empirical treatment. The need for antimicrobial stewardship cannot be overemphasized as it will help streamline and improve the prescribing pattern.

Impact of antimicrobial stewardship interventions on peripartum antibiotic prescribing in patients with penicillin allergy

Beta-lactam antibiotics (eg, penicillins, cephalosporins, and carbapenems) are preferred for group B streptococcus prophylaxis, intra-amniotic infection, and cesarean surgical site infection prophylaxis. Non-beta-lactam alternatives are associated with inferior efficacy and contribute to higher rates of surgical site infection and longer lengths of stay. Most patients who report a penicillin allergy can tolerate penicillins without any adverse reaction. There are low rates of cross-reactivity between penicillins and other beta-lactams, including cephalosporins and carbapenems. Efforts to evaluate penicillin allergy and promote the use of beta-lactams are needed. This study aimed to evaluate whether an antimicrobial stewardship intervention improved the use of first-line antibiotics for peripartum indications in patients with a reported penicillin allergy, following updates to institutional guidelines. This was a retrospective study of adult patients presenting for vaginal or cesarean delivery at 2 hospitals within a healthcare system. Patients received at least 1 dose of antibiotics for a peripartum indication between May 1, 2018, and October 31, 2018 (preintervention group) and May 1, 2020, to October 31, 2020 (postintervention group). The stewardship intervention bundle, which was implemented between March 2019 and April 2020, included updates to institutional antibiotic guidelines, reclassification of severe penicillin allergy, development of obstetrical prophylaxis and treatment order sets, promotion of allergy referral services, and establishment of a physician champion. The primary outcome was the composite rates of patients with reported penicillin allergy who received a preferred antibiotic for a peripartum indication. The secondary measures included maternal and neonatal outcomes. A total of 192 patients with a history of documented penicillin allergy were evaluated (96 patients in the preintervention group and 96 patients in the postintervention group). Hives were the most commonly reported index symptom in both groups (40/96 [41.7%] vs 39/96 [40.6%]; P=.883). After stewardship interventions, there was a significant increase in the rate of preferred antibiotic use (33/96 [34.3%] vs 81/96 [84.3%]; P<.001). The effect was the greatest in patients with nonsevere allergy (14/76 [18.4%] vs 68/82 [82.9%]; P<.001). There was no difference in the rates of postpartum endometritis, 30-day readmission, 90-day surgical site infection, or neonatal early-onset sepsis between the pre- and postintervention groups. Of note, 1 patient in the postintervention group experienced itching, and another patient developed a rash, both of which resolved with medical management. A comprehensive antibiotic stewardship intervention was associated with a 50% increase in the use of preferred antibiotics for peripartum indications in patients with penicillin allergy. Allergic reactions with first-line beta-lactams were minimal and manageable.

Impact of antimicrobial stewardship interventions on days of therapy and guideline adherence: A comparative point-prevalence survey assessment

BackgroundAntimicrobial stewardship (AMS) is a crucial tool for rationalizing the use of antimicrobial agents and reducing the burden of antimicrobial resistance. We aimed to assess the impact of AMS interventions on antimicrobial utilization and adherence to antimicrobial guidelines.MethodsWe conducted a prospective quasi-experimental study at a major tertiary hospital in the United Arab Emirates. Using standardized World Health Organization’s methodology, point-prevalence surveys (PPS) were performed in November 2019 and January 2022. Core AMS interventions consisted of proactive bloodstream infection service, proactive and reactive infectious diseases consult service, prospective audit and feedback by clinical pharmacists, development of antimicrobial guidelines based on cumulative antibiograms, and implementation of induction programs for new clinical staff. Days of therapy (DOT) per 1000 patient days present and rate of compliance with antimicrobial guidelines were compared before and after the core interventions. Multiple logistic regression analysis was carried out to adjust for the potential confounding effects of age, gender, hospitalization within 90 days, central or peripheral line insertion, urinary catheterization, and mechanical ventilation. P-value&amp;lt;0.05 was considered statistically significant.ResultsPre- and post-intervention PPSs included 292 and 370 patients, respectively. Both had similar age and gender distribution. Patients receiving antimicrobials were 51% (149/292) in 2019 and 45% (166/370) in 2022 (p 0.12). Univariate analysis showed a reduced post-intervention DOT per 1000 patients present (6.1 +/- 16.2 vs 2.4 +/-5.1, p&amp;lt;0.01) and an improved post-intervention guideline compliance (59% vs 67%, p 0.23). Following multiple logistic regression, the reduction in post-intervention DOT remained statistically significant (co-efficient -0.17 (95% CI -8.58 to -1.94, p&amp;lt;0.01), and the improvement in guideline adherence became statistically significant (adjusted odds ratio 1.91 (95% CI 1.05 to 3.45, p 0.03).ConclusionCoordinated and sustained AMS interventions have a significant impact on improving antimicrobial utilisation and adherence to guidelines.

Factors Influencing the Implementation of Antimicrobial Stewardship in Primary Care: A Narrative Review.

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is directly driven by inappropriate use of antibiotics. Although the majority of antibiotics (an estimated 80%) are consumed in primary care settings, antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) activities in primary care remain underdeveloped and factors influencing their implementation are poorly understood. This can result in promising stewardship activities having little-to-no real-world impact. With this narrative review, we aim to identify and summarize peer-reviewed literature reporting on (1) the nature and impact of AMS interventions in primary care and (2) the individual and contextual factors influencing their implementation. Reported activities included AMS at different contextual levels (individual, collective and policy). AMS activities being often combined, it is difficult to evaluate them as stand-alone interventions. While some important individual and contextual factors were reported (difficulty to reach physicians leading to a low uptake of interventions, tight workflow of physicians requiring implementation of flexible and brief interventions and AMS as a unique opportunity to strengthen physician-patients relationship), this review identified a paucity of information in the literature about the factors that support or hinder implementation of AMS in primary care settings. In conclusion, identifying multilevel barriers and facilitators for AMS uptake is an essential step to explore before implementing primary care AMS interventions.

891. Challenging the Dogma of Beta-Lactam Allergies: Impact of an Antimicrobial Stewardship Program

Abstract Background Penicillin allergies are reported in approximately 10% of patients in the US but ∼90% of these allergies can be de-labeled. Consequences of inappropriate allergy labeling leads to use of alternative agents associated with increased adverse events and resistance rates, leading to worse outcomes. Though all beta-lactam agents share the core beta-lactam ring, the R1 side chain has been identified as the focus of cross-reactivity. Agents that do not share the same or similar R1 side chain are likely to have negligible risk of hypersensitivity reactions. The purpose of this study was to assess the incidence of hypersensitivity reactions in patients with a documented beta-lactam allergy that received a beta-lactam agent with a different side chain based on recommendation by an antimicrobial stewardship clinical pharmacist. Methods This was a retrospective, single-center, observational study of patients admitted to NYU Langone Hospital – Long Island from October 2019 to February 2022. Data was collected by review of the electronic medical record and descriptive statistics were generated as appropriate. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients that experienced a hypersensitivity reaction to a beta-lactam agent with a different side chain. Secondary outcomes included impact of antimicrobial stewardship intervention by clinical pharmacists, avoidance of alternative antibiotics, and cost comparison between agents requested and recommended. Results A total of 181 patients were included in the final analysis, including 37 patients with a history of anaphylaxis. No patients with a documented beta-lactam allergy experienced a hypersensitivity reaction upon receiving a beta-lactam agent with a different side chain. Within the cost comparison, meropenem accounted for 45.6% and 75.9% of the total minimum and maximum wholesale costs of requested agents, respectively. Conclusion The results of this study suggest that receipt of a beta-lactam agent with a different side chain is safe in patients with a history of beta-lactam allergy, including anaphylaxis history, and supports 'in the moment' antimicrobial stewardship intervention to ensure patients receive optimal therapy when access to in-depth allergy history or detailed patient interview is not feasible. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures.

Impact of antimicrobial stewardship intervention in clean and clean-contaminated surgical procedures at a Vietnamese national hospital.

We investigated the characteristics of prophylactic antimicrobial use in clean and clean-contaminated surgical procedures and assessed the efficacy of a prophylactic antimicrobial stewardship intervention at Thong Nhat Hospital, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. A cross-sectional study was conducted on 354 patients who underwent either clean or clean-contaminated surgical procedures at Thong Nhat Hospital. Eligible patients were classified with respect to three periods of intervention from 2017 to 2020. Data collection included surgical procedures, patient characteristics, and prophylactic antimicrobial usage. We determined the efficacy of antimicrobial stewardship intervention based on comparisons among the primary outcome (the appropriateness of prophylactic antimicrobials) and secondary outcomes (postoperative antimicrobial prophylaxis (AP) prolongation, length of postoperative hospital stay, and cost of antimicrobials). The mean age of patients in periods 1, 2, and 3 was 54.5 ± 16.6, 50.2 ± 16.5, and 52.8 ± 17.3years, respectively, with an overall male/female ratio of 1.1/1. No significant differences were detected in basic patient characteristics during the three periods. Majority of the surgical procedures were clean (56%-59%) and scheduled (85%-86%). Prophylactic antimicrobial stewardship intervention enhanced AP appropriateness (by 12.7%, 12.7%, and 39.0% in periods 1, 2, and 3, respectively, p < 0.001), decreased postoperative prophylactic antimicrobial duration [3.0 (0-6), 1.5 (0-5), and 0.0 (0-1) days, respectively, p < 0.001], and reduced average antimicrobial expenses (p < 0.001). The prophylactic antimicrobial stewardship interventions introduced at Thong Nhat Hospital had several positive impacts on the appropriateness of prophylactic antimicrobial use and treatment costs.

39. Impact of Antimicrobial Stewardship Interventions in a Community Hospital setting: An Interrupted Times Analysis

Abstract Background Community hospitals have fewer resources for antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASP) compared to larger tertiary hospitals. At our 312-bed community hospital, Long Island Jewish Forest Hills/Northwell, a combination of modified preauthorization, prospective audit feedback, and ASP education was implemented starting in August 2019 (Monday through Friday 9 am to 5 pm). Methods This retrospective study evaluated the impact of ASP interventions on the rate of targeted antimicrobial use over a 7 month pre- vs 7 month post- intervention period (Aug 2018 to Feb 2019 vs Aug 2019 to Feb 2020). Targeted antimicrobials included piperacillin-tazobactam, vancomycin, daptomycin, and carbapenems. The primary outcome was the monthly mean for overall targeted antimicrobial use measured by the rate of antimicrobial days per 1000 days present. Secondary outcomes were the individual rates of antimicrobial days per 1000 days present for each of the targeted antimicrobials, and the hospital’s overall standardized antimicrobial administration ratio (SAAR). Data were analyzed as a segmented regression of interrupted time series. Results Pre-intervention, there was an increasing trend (positive slope, p&amp;lt; 0.05) in the monthly mean, hospital SAAR, vancomycin and piperacillin-tazobactam use. Post-intervention, there was a significant change in slope for these same metrics, indicating a decrease in the mean use. Immediate impact of ASP interventions, measured by the difference in antibiotic use between the end of each intervention period, was visually evident in all cases except carbapenems (Fig. 1 through 4). The immediate impact on the overall monthly mean represented a significant reduction in the rate of antimicrobial days per 1000 days present, -12.72 (CI -21.02 to -4.42, P &amp;lt; 0.0066). The pre- vs post- ASP gap for all measures was negative and consistent with fewer days of antibiotic use immediately following intervention. Conclusion A targeted, multifaceted ASP intervention utilizing modified preauthorization, prospective audit feedback, and education significantly reduced antibiotic use in a community hospital. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

137. Impact of Antimicrobial Stewardship Interventions on Post-Elective Caesarean Antibiotic Prophylaxis and Surgical Site Infections

BackgroundAntimicrobial stewardship programs (ASP) aim to improve appropriate antimicrobial use. Post-operative antibiotics are generally not necessary, especially those without surgical site infections risk factors (e.g. obesity). Few studies have described the impact of ASP interventions on patient outcomes especially in unique populations such as obstetrics. This study aims to evaluate the impact of ASP interventions on post-elective caesarean (eLSCS) oral antibiotic prophylaxis use and patient outcomes including SSI rates.MethodsThis pre-post quasi-experimental study was conducted over 9 months (2 months pre- and 7 months post-intervention) in all women admitted for eLSCS in our institution. Interventions included eLSCS surgical prophylaxis guideline dissemination, where a single antibiotic dose within 60 minutes before skin incision was recommended. Post-eLSCS oral antibiotics was actively discouraged in those without SSI risk factors. This was followed by ASP intervention notes (phase 1) for 3 months, and an additional phone call to the ward team for the next 7 months (phase 2). Phase 3 (next 6 months) constituted speaking to the operating consultant. The primary outcome was post-operative oral antibiotics prescription rates. Secondary outcomes included rates of 30-day post-operative SSI.ResultsA total of 1751 women was reviewed. Appropriateness of pre-operative antibiotic prophylaxis was 98% in our institution. There were 244 women pre-intervention, 274 in post-intervention phase 1, 658 in phase 2 and 575 in phase 3. Pre-intervention post-eLSCS antibiotic prescribing rates was 82% (200), which reduced significantly post-intervention to 54% (148) in phase 1, 50% (331) in phase 2 and 39% (226) in phase 3 (p< 0.001). There was no significant difference in patients who developed post-operative SSI pre-post intervention (0.8%, 2 of 242 vs. 1.9%, 28 of 1479, p=0.420) and among who received post-operative oral antibiotics compared to those without (1.9%, 17 of 905 vs. 1.5%, 13 of 846, p=0.582).ConclusionASP interventions can reduce post-eLSCS antibiotic prophylaxis rates without adversely impacting patient safety.Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Implementation of Veterans Affairs Primary Care Antimicrobial Stewardship Interventions For Asymptomatic Bacteriuria And Acute Respiratory Infections.

Background Outpatient antimicrobial prescribing is an important target for antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) interventions to decrease antimicrobial resistance. The objective of this study was to design, implement, and evaluate the impact of AMS interventions focused on asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB) and acute respiratory infections (ARIs) in the primary care setting.MethodsThis stepped-wedge trial evaluated the impact of multifaceted educational interventions to providers on adult patients presenting to primary care clinics for ARIs and ASB. The primary outcome was percentage of overall antibiotic prescriptions as a composite of prescriptions for ASB, acute bronchitis, upper respiratory infection not otherwise specified, uncomplicated sinusitis, and uncomplicated pharyngitis. Secondary outcomes were the individual components of the primary outcome; a composite safety endpoint of related hospital, emergency department, or primary care visits within 4 weeks; antibiotic selection appropriateness; and patient satisfaction surveys.ResultsA total of 887 patients were included (405 preintervention and 482 postintervention). After controlling for type I error using Bonferroni correction, the primary outcome was not significantly different between groups (56% vs 49%). There was a statistically significant decrease in prescriptions for acute bronchitis (20.99% vs 12.66%; P = .0003). Appropriateness of antibiotic prescriptions for uncomplicated sinusitis (odds ratio [OR], 4.96 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 1.79–13.75]; P = .0021) and pharyngitis (OR, 5.36 [95% CI, 1.93–14.90]; P = .0013) was improved in the postintervention vs the preintervention group. The composite safety outcome and patient satisfaction surveys did not differ between groups.ConclusionsMultifaceted educational interventions targeting providers can improve antibiotic prescribing for indications rarely requiring antimicrobials without increasing re-visits or patient satisfaction surveys.

PIN3 Impact of Antimicrobial Stewardship Interventions on Compliance with Surgical Antibiotic Prophylaxis: A Systematic Review

There is paucity of data describing the effectiveness of antimicrobial stewardship in improving compliance with surgical antibiotic prophylaxis. This review evaluated the impact of antimicrobial stewardship interventions on compliance with surgical antibiotic prophylaxis measures, surgical site infection and economic outcome. PubMed, Scopus, Science Direct, and Google Scholar databases were searched to identify eligible studies that reported the impact of antimicrobial stewardship on compliance with surgical antibiotic prophylaxis and/or antibiotic utilization, surgical site infections from 2000 to 2017. Fourteen studies were selected; eight (57%) uncontrolled before-and-after studies, and two each randomized trial, interrupted time series and controlled before-and-after studies. Clinician education, organizational changes and audit and feedback were the most common stewardship interventions. Stewardship interventions improved compliance with antibiotic selection (1% - 90%); timing of first dose (5% - 96%); intra-operative re-dosing (28% - 53%); and total compliance (19% - 44%). Duration of antibiotic prophylaxis had the least improvement (7% - 25%) after stewardship interventions. Generally, studies with low baseline compliance rate showed greater improvements after stewardship interventions. Stewardship interventions reduced antibiotic utilization (20% - 35% Defined Daily Dose/100 procedures), surgical site infections (0.8% - 5.6%), and the costs of antibiotic prophylaxis per procedure ($ 2.5 - $ 345). Participation of stakeholders in antimicrobial stewardship program was vital for the success of the interventions. Low quality evidence shows that stewardship interventions improve compliance with surgical antibiotic prophylaxis measures, and reduced antibiotic utilization, surgical site infections and cost of surgical antibiotic prophylaxis.

Roll out of a successful antimicrobial stewardship programme in Lagos University Teaching Hospital Nigeria using the Global-Point Prevalence Survey

Background: Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) has become a public health emergency with increasing rates and spread globally. Antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) has been advocated to reduce the burden of antimicrobial resistance, promote rational and appropriate use of antibiotics and improve clinical outcomes. Education and training are one of the AMS interventions to improve antimicrobial use. We present the roll out of a successful AMS programme with education and training using the Global-PPS as data collection tool to measure AMS interventions and impact.Methodology: This was a cross sectional study on the implementation of an AMS programme at the Lagos University Teaching Hospital. Global PPS was conducted in 2015 to collect baseline data which was used to identify targets for quality improvement in AMS and was repeated in 2017 and 2018 to measure impact of AMS interventions. AMS interventions included education, feedback of Global-PPS result and writing of the hospitalwide antibiotic policy based on the baseline data.Results: Out of the 746 inpatients surveyed, 476 (68.3%) had received at least one antimicrobial on the days of Global-PPS. The antimicrobial prescribing rates reduced significantly over the three time periods. In 2015, 82.5% were placed on antimicrobials, 65.5% in 2017 and 51.1% in 2018 (p&lt;0.00001). The documentation of indication for treatment significantly improved from 53.4% in 2015 to 97.2% in 2018 (p&lt;0.0001). Stop review date also significantly improved from 28.7% to 70.2% in 2018 (p&lt;0.00001). Surgical prophylaxis for more than 24 hours reduced significantly from 93.3% in 2015 to 65.7% in 2018 (p=0.002) even though the prevalence was still high. The three most commonly administered antimicrobial groups were third generation cephalosporins, imidazole derivatives and quinolones. The most commonly prescribed antibiotics for surgical prophylaxis were ceftriaxone and metronidazole in 2015 and ceftriaxone in 2017.Conclusion: The use of education and training as AMS intervention in a limited resource setting clearly made impact on antimicrobial prescribing patterns in the hospital. Global-PPS is useful to set quality improvement targets and for monitoring, evaluation and surveillance of an AMS programme.&#x0D; Keywords: Antibiotic, Stewardship, Resistance, Education, Global-PPS

Impact of antimicrobial stewardship interventions on reducing antifungal use in hospitals in Jordan.

Impact of antimicrobial stewardship interventions on reducing antifungal use in hospitals in Jordan.

Impact of an antimicrobial stewardship intervention in neonatal intensive care: Recommendations and implementation.

To (i) determine the appropriateness of antimicrobial prescribing in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) and (ii) assess the impact of a collaborative antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) intervention on prescribing practices. The intervention was a weekly AMS audit-feedback joint ward round (6-month period) of Neonatology and Infectious Diseases clinicians in a tertiary neonatal intensive care unit in Melbourne, Australia. Antibiotic prescriptions were audited and recommendations delivered in real time. The proportion of recommendations implemented was used to assess acceptability of the intervention. During the study period, there were 23 AMS rounds, during which 249 patients were reviewed at 627 separate episodes. Of these, 233 (37%) episodes were for patients receiving antimicrobials. Of these, 147 (63%) received empirical antimicrobial treatment, 43 (18%) targeted antimicrobial treatment and 43 (18%) antimicrobial prophylaxis. There were 58 (25%) of 233 episodes of inappropriate antibiotic use, and 62 recommendations for improvement. Most common recommendations were to narrow (33/62, 53%) or stop (12/62, 19%) antimicrobials. The majority (45, 73%) of recommendations were accepted, resulting in significant improvement in the proportion of the 233 episodes that had completely appropriate antibiotic prescribing: 175 (75%) to 217 (93%) (relative risk 1.2, 95% confidence intervals 1.1-1.3, P < 0.001). A collaborative audit-feedback AMS intervention was effective in identifying inappropriate antimicrobial prescriptions and impacted positively on treatment plans. Ancillary benefits were improved communication between departments and the revision of antimicrobial prescribing guidelines.

The role of antimicrobial stewardship in preventing KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae.

Antimicrobial stewardship programmes are widely considered to be a core component of the response to the antimicrobial resistance threat. However, a positive impact of these interventions in terms of microbiological outcomes remains difficult to demonstrate, especially when focusing on specific resistant phenotypes. The first part of this review aims to explore the complex relationship between antibiotic exposure and resistance development in KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae. In the second part we aim to summarize published examples of antimicrobial stewardship interventions intended to impact on the epidemiology of KPC-producing K. pneumoniae. For this purpose, a literature search was performed and seven studies were included in the review. Both restrictive and non-restrictive interventions were associated with an overall reduction in antibiotic consumption, and a decrease in carbapenem resistance rates was observed in five studies. The overall quality of the evidence was low, mainly due to the poor reporting of microbiological outcomes, lack of a control group and suboptimal study design. Although the link between antibiotic use and resistance development is supported by strong evidence, demonstrating the impact of antimicrobial stewardship interventions on microbiological outcomes remains difficult. Studies with adequate design and appropriate outcome measures are needed to further promote antimicrobial stewardship and elucidate which interventions are more successful for controlling the spread of KPC-producing K. pneumoniae.

Defining the Scope of Antimicrobial Stewardship Interventions on the Prescription Quality of Antibiotics for Surgical Intra-Abdominal Infections.

Background: The aim of this study was to assess the impact of antimicrobial stewardship interventions on surgical antibiotic prescription behavior in the management of non-elective surgical intra-abdominal infections, focusing on postoperative antibiotic use, including the appropriateness of indications. Methods: A single-center quality improvement study with retrospective evaluation of the impact of antimicrobial stewardship measures on optimizing antibacterial use in intra-abdominal infections requiring emergency surgery was performed. The study was conducted in a tertiary hospital in Germany from January 1, 2016, to January 30, 2020, three years after putting a set of antimicrobial stewardship standards into effect. Results: 767 patients were analyzed (n = 495 in 2016 and 2017, the baseline period; n = 272 in 2018, the antimicrobial stewardship period). The total days of therapy per 100 patient days declined from 47.0 to 42.2 days (p = 0.035). The rate of patients receiving postoperative therapy decreased from 56.8% to 45.2% (p = 0.002), comparing both periods. There was a significant decline in the rate of inappropriate indications (17.4% to 8.1 %, p = 0.015) as well as a significant change from broad-spectrum to narrow-spectrum antibiotic use (28.8% to 6.5%, p ≤ 0.001) for postoperative therapy. The significant decline in antibiotic use did not affect either clinical outcomes or the rate of postoperative wound complications. Conclusions: Postoperative antibiotic use for intra-abdominal infections could be significantly reduced by antimicrobial stewardship interventions. The identification of inappropriate indications remains a key target for antimicrobial stewardship programs.

141. Implementation of Veterans Affairs Outpatient Antimicrobial Stewardship Interventions for Asymptomatic Bacteriuria and Acute Respiratory Infections, a Stepped Wedge Randomized Study

BackgroundOutpatient antimicrobial prescribing is an important target for antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) interventions to decrease antimicrobial resistance in the United States. The objective of this study was to design, implement and evaluate the impact of AMS interventions focused on asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB) and acute respiratory infections (ARIs) in the outpatient setting.MethodsThis randomized, stepped-wedge trial evaluated the impact of educational interventions to providers on adult patients presenting to primary care (PC) clinics for ARIs and ASB from 10/1/19 to 1/31/20. Data was collected by retrospective chart review. An antibiotic prescribing report card was provided to PC providers, then an educational session was delivered at each PC clinic. Patient education materials were distributed to PC clinics. Interventions were made in a step-wise (figure 1) fashion. The primary outcome was percentage of overall antibiotic prescriptions as a composite of prescriptions for ASB, acute bronchitis, upper-respiratory infection otherwise unspecified, uncomplicated sinusitis, and uncomplicated pharyngitis. Secondary outcomes included individual components of the primary outcome, a composite safety endpoint of related hospital, emergency department or primary care visit within 4 weeks, antibiotic appropriateness, and patient satisfaction surveys.Figure 1 ResultsThere were 887 patients included for analysis (405 pre-intervention, 482 post-intervention). Baseline characteristics are summarized in table 1. After controlling for type 1 error using a Bonferroni correction the primary outcome was not significantly different between groups (56% vs 49%). There was a statistically significant decrease in prescriptions for bronchitis (20.99% vs 12.66%; p=0.0003). Appropriateness of prescriptions for sinusitis (OR 4.96; CI 1.79–13.75; p=0.0021) and pharyngitis (OR 5.36; CI 1.93 – 14.90; p=0.0013) was improved in the post-intervention group. The composite safety outcome and patient satisfaction survey ratings did not differ between groups.Table 1 ConclusionMultifaceted educational interventions targeting providers can improve antibiotic prescribing for indications rarely requiring antimicrobials without increasing re-visit or patient satisfaction surveys.Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

55. Ertapenem for surgical prophylaxis: the impact of antimicrobial stewardship interventions on inappropriate carbapenem utilization at a community teaching hospital

BackgroundInternal analysis of ertapenem utilization revealed overuse for surgical prophylaxis in intra-abdominal (IA) procedures. Our Antimicrobial Management Team (AMT) initiated a multimodal intervention to promote the appropriate use of ertapenem. The primary objective of this study is to describe and evaluate the impact of our interventions targeting ertapenem utilization for IA surgical prophylaxis.MethodsFrom March to October 2019, a pre-post study was performed to evaluate ertapenem utilization for surgical prophylaxis. Our AMT interventions which were formally implemented in June 2019 included the following: targeted provider feedback, review and update of our surgical prophylactic antibiotic protocol (SPAP), policy, and order set addition of Cefoxitin to formulary, extensive provider education, and monitoring of SPAP compliance. Data was abstracted from the electronic medical record for IA cases and included antibiotics prescribed, procedure type, and prescriber information. In addition, surgical site infection (SSI) rates and Clostridium difficile infection rates were monitored throughout the study period.ResultsIn total, 1,080 IA surgical cases were reviewed. The set quality measure of less than 5 percent ertapenem utilization was achieved each month after AMT interventions in June 2019, as demonstrated by monthly ertapenem use for surgical prophylaxis: 13.7 percent in March, 13.4 percent in April, 4.9 percent in May, 8.9 percent in June, 3.1 percent in July, 2.2 percent in August, 4.5 percent in September, and 3.4 percent in October. Overall, the number of ertapenem cases was 58 pre-study (March to June) versus 16 post-study (July to October), accounting for a 72.4 percent reduction in ertapenem utilization for IA surgical prophylaxis. The rate of SSI among IA surgeries and Clostridium difficile infection did not increase as a consequence of our interventionsConclusionCarbapenem use for surgical prophylaxis was consistently within threshold limits following the stewardship interventions. Incidence of surgical site infections and Clostridium difficile infection did not increase during the interventions suggesting that alternate antimicrobial agents in the SPAP are safe and effective for IA surgeries in our patient population.Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

69. Impact of antimicrobial stewardship interventions on post-elective caesarean antibiotic prophylaxis and surgical site infections

BackgroundAntimicrobial stewardship programs (ASP) aim to improve appropriate antimicrobial use. This study aims to evaluate the impact of ASP interventions on post-elective caesarean (eLSCS) oral antibiotic prophylaxis use. In a subgroup of those without surgical site infection (SSI) risk factors, 30-day SSI rates was compared in those who received post-eLSCS oral antibiotics vs. those without.MethodsThis pre-post quasi-experimental study was conducted over 9 months (2 months pre- and 7 months post-intervention) in all women admitted for eLSCS in our institution. Interventions included eLSCS surgical prophylaxis guideline dissemination, where a single antibiotic dose within 60 minutes before skin incision was recommended. Post-eLSCS oral antibiotics was discouraged in those without SSI risk factors (e.g. obesity). This was followed by ASP intervention notes (phase 1) for 3 months, and an additional phone call to the ward team for the next 4 months (phase 2).ResultsA total of 894 women were reviewed. There were 244 women in the pre-intervention phase, 274 in post-intervention phase 1 and 376 in phase 2. Pre-intervention post-eLSCS antibiotic prescribing rates was 82% (200), compared to 54% (148) in phase 1 and 49% (180) in phase 2 (p< 0.001). There were 560 women without SSI risk factors. Of these, only 4 of 301 (1.3%) who received oral antibiotics, and 3 of 259 (1.2%) without oral antibiotics developed post-op SSI (p=1.000).ConclusionASP can reduce post-eLSCS antibiotic prophylaxis. In those without SSI risk factors, use of post-eLSCS oral antibiotics did not impact SSI rates.Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Impact of Antimicrobial Stewardship Interventions on Antibiotic Exposure in Pediatric Surgical Patients

Impact of Antimicrobial Stewardship Interventions on Antibiotic Exposure in Pediatric Surgical Patients