Immunosuppressive Management Research Articles

12339 Rotating Insulin Injection Sites Isn't Enough: A Challenging Case Of Insulin-Induced Lipoatrophic Panniculitis

Abstract Disclosure: J. Hand: None. S. Nemiroff: None. C. Zmijewski: None. C.J. Levy: None. Introduction: Insulin-induced localized lipoatrophy is a rare phenomenon that involves the loss of subcutaneous adipose tissue around sites of insulin injections, and it often presents as a deep, retracted scar on the skin. Its prevalence has dropped significantly given improvements in recombinant and purified insulin and its analogs, from 55% to more recently 1-2%. Lipoatrophy can cause erratic absorption of insulin, leading to suboptimal glycemic control and hypoglycemia. The pathophysiology is not completely understood but is thought to be immune-mediated. Treatment options are limited and often focus on rotating injection sites or changing the type of insulin, though some case reports alternatively describe using corticosteroid injections. Here, we report an unusual case where a patient developed a form of early, localized lipoatrophy called lipoatrophic panniculitis due to insulin. Clinical Case: A 28-year-old male with a 13-year history of type 1 diabetes presented for insulin optimization. The patient was using multiple daily injection (MDI) insulin therapy and later an insulin pump, with careful infusion site rotation. Seven years later, he experienced issues with his pump sites, developing nodules and bruises that became painful and caused labile glycemic control. He underwent dermatologic, rheumatologic, and allergic workup with two biopsies confirming insulin-induced lipoatrophic panniculitis. Immunosuppressive and varying insulin regimens were unsuccessful. Hydroxychloroquine and methotrexate showed limited improvement with intolerable gastrointestinal side effects. Trials of hydrocortisone in his insulin infusion or topical clobetasol with tacrolimus provided no benefit. Various MDI regimens with different concentrations of lispro, aspart, faster aspart, glargine, detemir, and degludec were tried; all elicited varying degrees of pain with suboptimal glycemic response. A supervised trial of inhaled insulin was associated with bronchospasms. An implantable insulin pump was sought through clinical trials but was not feasible due to eligibility. Ultimately, he was successfully referred for pancreas transplantation due to his labile and complicated diabetes, but the procedure was complicated by allograft thrombosis and failure. He is currently awaiting a second transplant. Clinical Lesson: There are few reports of patients with insulin-induced lipoatrophic panniculitis in the literature. It is an important differential to consider for a patient that is having unexpected glycemic excursions, and it is equally as challenging to select an adequate management regimen. Treatment is limited and a broad range of options need to be considered. When these patients fail mainstay immunosuppressive, corticosteroid, and insulin-based management, pancreas transplantation may be considered as an alternative feasible treatment. Presentation: 6/1/2024

Lymphocyte Immune Assays for the Management of Immunosuppression of Kidney Transplant Patients in Sepsis

Lymphocyte Immune Assays for the Management of Immunosuppression of Kidney Transplant Patients in Sepsis

Cancer Screening and Cancer Treatment in Kidney Transplant Recipients.

As the population ages and post-transplant survival improves, pretransplant and post-transplant malignancy are becoming increasingly common. In addition, rapid advances in cancer therapies and improving outcomes prompt us to rethink pretransplant cancer-free wait time and screening strategies. Although kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) are at higher risk of developing cancer, epidemiological data on how to best screen and treat cancers in KTRs are incomplete. Thus, current recommendations are still largely on the basis of studies in the general population, and their validity in KTRs is uncertain. Kidney transplant candidates without prior cancer should be evaluated for latent malignancies even in the absence of symptoms. Conversely, individuals with a history of malignancy require thorough monitoring to detect potential recurrences or de novo malignancies. When treating KTRs with cancer, reducing immunosuppression can enhance antitumor immunity, yet this also increases the risk of graft rejection. Optimal treatment and immunosuppression management remains undefined. As the emergence of novel cancer therapies adds complexity to this challenge, individualized risk-benefit assessment is crucial. In this review, we discuss up-to-date data on pretransplant screening and cancer-free wait time, as well as post-transplant cancer screening, prevention strategies, and treatment, including novel therapies such as immune checkpoint inhibitors and chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapies.

Immunosuppression regimen and latitude impact keratinocyte carcinoma risk in U.S. liver transplant recipients

Immunosuppression after solid organ transplantation is associated with an increased risk of keratinocyte carcinoma (KC). Despite its established morbidity, KC risk in liver transplant (LT) recipients is understudied, including the contribution of immunosuppression regimen and latitude. A retrospective cohort of 9,966 adult first LT alone recipients alive with their native allograft at 1-year post-LT without prior KC between 2007 and 2016 were identified using linked data from the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network and Medicare administrative claims. The primary exposures were immunosuppression regimen and latitude of residence. The primary outcome was incident, de novo KC occurring at least 1-year after LT. Adjusted Cox regression analysis stratified by transplant center was used in all analyses. The cohort was 63.4% male, 70.2% White and with median age 61 years (interquartile range, IQR, 54–66) at transplant. Calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) with anti-metabolite combination was independently associated with incident KC when measured as intention-to-treat (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 1.21 vs. CNI monotherapy, 95% CI 1.02–1.43, p = 0.026), in a time-updating as-treated analysis (aHR 1.61, 95% CI 1.34–1.93; p < 0.001) and when measured as cumulative exposure (aHR 1.13 per 6-month increase, 95% CI: 1.02–1.33; p = 0.027). More southern latitude of residence was also independently associated with incident KC with an aHR of 1.26 per 5°N decrease towards the Equator (95% CI: 1.08–1.47, p = 0.003). We demonstrate independent effects of CNI with antiM immunosuppression regimen and latitude of residence on the risk of post-LT KC, which will better inform screening practices and immunosuppression management.

Genitourinary malignancies in kidney transplant recipients.

Advances in immunosuppressive therapy and postoperative management have greatly improved the graft and patient survival rates after kidney transplantation; however, the incidence of post-transplant malignant tumors is increasing. Post-renal transplantation malignant tumors are associated with renal failure, immunosuppression, and viral infections. Moreover, the risk of developing cancer is higher in kidney transplant recipients than in the general population, and the tendency to develop cancer is affected by the background and environment of each patient. Recently, cancer after kidney transplantation has become the leading cause of death in Japan. Owing to the aggressive nature and poor prognosis of genitourinary malignancies, it is crucial to understand their epidemiology, risk factors, and best practices in kidney transplant recipients. This review has a special emphasis on the epidemiology, risk factors, and treatment protocols of genitourinary malignancies in kidney transplant recipients to enhance our understanding of the appropriate management strategies. Optimal immunosuppressive therapy and cancer management for these patients remain controversial, but adherence to the general guidelines is recommended.

Challenges in Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Review of Current Controversies.

Liver transplantation (LT) remains one of the most effective treatments for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and significantly enhances patient survival. However, the application of LT for HCC faces challenges owing to advancements in cancer-specific treatment modalities and the increased burden of patients' comorbidities. This narrative review explores current controversies and advancements in LT for HCC. Key areas of focus include the management of comorbidities and patient education by advanced practice nurses, impacts of frailty on waitlists and post-LT outcomes, selection criteria for LT in the era of new downstaging tools, role of radiology in patient selection, and implications of potential immunotherapy use both before and after LT. Additionally, the importance of immunosuppression management with strategies aimed at minimizing rejection while considering the risk of HCC recurrence and the role of surveillance for HCC recurrence is highlighted. This review also underscores the importance of a multidisciplinary approach for optimizing outcomes in patients with HCC undergoing LT.

Current Management of Warm Autoimmune Haemolytic Anaemia and Recent Advancements in Research: Interview with a Key Opinion Leader

Warm autoimmune haemolytic anaemia (wAIHA) is a rare, life-threatening disorder caused by autoantibodies that lead to the premature destruction of erythrocytes (haemolysis). There is currently no licensed targeted therapy for wAIHA. Until recently, there has been little research attention on autoimmune haemolytic anaemias (AIHA), with few developments in the field over the past 20 years. The last 3 years have seen a surge in research interest in wAIHA, with the development of potential new therapies for this rare disorder. For this article, the EMJ conducted an interview in June 2024 with key opinion leader, Bruno Fattizzo, from the University of Milan, and Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy, to raise awareness of wAIHA, and explore recent advancements in research on this disease. Fattizzo, who has a wealth of experience and expertise in the clinical management of wAIHA, provided valuable insights into topics such as the clinical and quality of life (QoL) impact of wAIHA on the patient; current management of wAIHA, including steroids, rituximab, immunosuppressants, splenectomy, anticoagulant prophylaxis, and recombinant erythropoietin; and remaining unmet needs in the disease area. Also discussed were potential future therapies for this autoimmune disorder, including tyrosine kinase inhibitors, neonatal fragment crystallisable receptor (FcRn) inhibitors, and B cell activating factor receptor (BAFF-R) antagonists, and the challenges involved in managing patients with wAIHA. Finally, Fattizzo described the patient experience of living with wAIHA, proposed how best to raise awareness of wAIHA among healthcare professionals, the scientific community, patients, and the public, and outlined what the future of the management of patients with wAIHA might look like.

Contemporary Immunosuppression Management and 1-Year Outcomes in Dual Organ Heart Transplantation.

There have been limited reports on immunosuppression strategies and outcomes in dual organ heart transplant populations, primarily from before the 2018 United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) heart allocation policy change. Recent data suggested that outcomes with heart-lung and heart-liver transplants remained comparable in the new allocation era, yet heart-kidney recipients have worse 1-year survival. This single-center retrospective study evaluated adult heart-kidney, heart-liver, and heart-lung transplant recipients from September 2019 to May 2023. Immunosuppression regimen, infectious complications, and graft outcomes were collected for 12 months. A total of 36 patients (kidney n = 20, liver n = 9, and lung n = 7) were included in this study. Basiliximab was the most commonly employed induction strategy across the organ groups (12/20 in kidney, 4/9 in liver, and 7/7 in lung). All patients were on triple immunosuppression at 12 months posttransplant with prednisone wean achieved in one heart-liver recipient. Infection complications were frequently reported (95% kidney, 75% liver, 100% lung group). One patient went back to dialysis due to focal segmental glomerulosclerosis. One chronic lung allograft dysfunction was reported, but no other severe biopsy-proven rejection or retransplant was reported. The 1-year survival was 85% (17/20) in heart-kidney, 78% (7/9) in heart-liver, and 86% (6/7) in heart-lung recipients. This study summarized real-world immunosuppression strategies and outcomes in dual organ heart transplant recipients.

Predictors of relapse of polymyositis/dermatomyositis associated interstitial lung disease.

Polymyositis/dermatomyositis (PM/DM) patients often develop interstitial lung disease (ILD), which can lead to relapse despite anti-inflammatory treatments. This study aims to elucidate the clinical characteristics of relapses in PM/DM-associated ILD patients. We gathered clinical data, including laboratory results, pulmonary function tests, chest high-resolution computed tomography findings from patients treated at Okinawa Chubu Hospital between January 1, 2010 and December 31, 2018. We identified a total of 74 patients, comprising 21 men and 53 women. Among them, 38 patients remained relapse-free with maintenance therapy, while 36 experienced relapses despite immunosuppressive management. We followed these patients until June 30, 2023, and 13 patients died. The median survival period was 51.4 months (range, 0.3-214 months). When comparing clinical variables, relapsed patients tended to be younger (49.9 vs. 64.1 years), reported myalgia and rash more frequently (63.9% vs. 28.9% and 61.15% vs. 21.1%, respectively). In terms of laboratory findings, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels were higher in relapsed patients (613±464 vs. 381±203 U/L). Radiological findings showed that ground glass opacity (GGO) was more prevalent in relapsed patients (58.3% vs. 16.7%). A Cox-proportional hazards model for relapse demonstrated that serum LDH [hazard ratio (HR) 1.005, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.000-1.009, P=0.02] and GGO (HR 1.863, 95% CI: 1.103-3.147, P=0.02) were valuable predictors of relapse. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis of serum LDH indicated that a threshold of 450 correctly classified relapse in PM/DM-associated ILD patients. Serum LDH and GGO may serve as predictors of relapse in PM/DM-associated ILD patients.

Rheumatoid meningitis: a case series report and review of modern therapeutic schemes and outcome.

Rheumatoid meningitis (RM) is an extremely rare extra-articular complication of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), with approximately 165 cases reported world-wide. RM exhibits a broad range of symptoms, with stroke-like episodes and seizures being the most common manifestations. The primary differential diagnoses include vascular and infectious diseases. The influence of immunomodulatory medications on the pathophysiology of RM remains unclear. There are no consensus guidelines on therapeutic regimen. We present four patients with prior history of RA that developed different neurological syndromes in correlation to radiological leptomeningitis. Clinical presentations, comorbid conditions, supplementary diagnostic assessments, treatments, and prognosis are provided. A literature review of recent immunosuppressive management in RM patients was performed. Three patients presented to hospital with recurrent focal seizures. Only two suffered meningism, reporting headache and fever. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed different grades of leptomeningitis across all cases. Notably, three cases demonstrated bilateral involvement extending to the pachymeninges. Two patients exhibited pronounced CSF mononuclear inflammation while extended microbiological evaluations yielded negative results. Two patients required biopsy for confirmation. The initiation of immunosuppressive therapy marked a turning point for three patients who previously exhibited progressive deterioration. Mortality was absent in all cases. Our experience remarks the elusive nature of RM. Rigorous exclusionary diagnostics are imperative to differentiate RM from mimicking conditions. Clinical manifestations oscillate between transient episodes and progressive neurological impairments, punctuated by frequent epileptic seizures. In scenarios where clinical worsening persists or where clinical and radiological evaluations are inconclusive, aggressive immunosuppressive therapy is recommended.

Significant Long-Term Prevention of High Sensitization After Kidney Allograft Failure by Maintaining Calcineurin Inhibitor-Based Immunosuppression.

Broad national or international programs contribute to mitigating the expected longer waiting list (WL) time for sensitized patients but with minor benefits for highly sensitized subjects. Therefore, strategies to prevent high sensitization are urgently required. In this study, we investigated the risk of developing highly sensitized patients with different immunosuppressive (IS) handling after kidney allograft failure (KAF). Data from 185 patients with KAF, retransplanted/relisted from 2010 to 2020 in two regions of Italy that share the same regional WL, were analyzed. Patients were categorized according to IS management at 12 months after KAF as follows: patients maintaining IS with calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) (late withdrawal group [LWG], n = 58) and those who withdrew all IS therapy or were on steroids only (early withdrawal group [EWG], n = 127). Patients in the LWG showed lower panel reactive antibodies (PRA) at 12 (29.0%vs. 85.5%, p < 0.001) and 24 months (61.0%vs. 91.0%, p = 0.001), reduced risk of high sensitization (PRA ≥90%) at 12 (9.4%vs. 40.7%, p < 0.001, OR = 0.15) and 24 months (25.6%vs. 57.3%, p = 0.001, OR = 0.26) and almost no very high sensitization (PRA ≥ 98%) at 12 months (1.9%vs. 18.6%, p=0.003, OR=0.08) after KAF. In the LWG subgroup analysis, patients who maintained IS for up to 24 months after KAF did not show very high sensitization. The LWG showed shorter active WL times (406vs. 813 days, p = 0.001) without an increased risk of complications. CNI maintenance for at least 12 months after KAF could be a useful approach to prevent high sensitization and reduce WL times in patients who are offered retransplantation, without a higher burden of complications.

Cefuroxime induced agranulocytosis during heart transplant period: A case report

Rationale: Cefuroxime is a commonly prescribed antibiotic known for its overall safety profile. However, in rare instances, it can lead to a life-threatening condition known as idiosyncratic drug-induced agranulocytosis (IDIA). While there have been few documented cases linking cefuroxime to this severe adverse reaction, a recent study sheds light on a critical case involving a patient awaiting a heart transplant. Patient concern: In this study, the patient developed agranulocytosis after 16 days and 72 grams of cefuroxime treatment. Agranulocytosis is characterized by a drastic reduction in neutrophil count, in this case dropping to 0/mm3. Diagnosis: IDIA is characterized by a drastic reduction in neutrophil count, in this case dropping to 0/mm3. Intervention: This IDIA coincided with the availability of a donor heart, prompting the medical team to proceed with an immediate heart transplant despite the patient’s compromised immune status. Ceasing cefuroxime administration and initiating treatment with G-CSF for 3 days played a pivotal role in normalizing neutrophil levels. A meticulously planned immunosuppressant regimen was also initiated. Outcomes: Precise management of immunosuppressants contributed to the patient’s successful recovery, leading to discharge. Lessons: The rationale for studying cases like these lies in the need for heightened awareness among healthcare providers. By documenting and analyzing such cases, medical professionals can better understand the risk factors, clinical presentation, and optimal management strategies for this uncommon yet serious adverse reaction. Furthermore, the study underscores the significance of individualized patient care, especially in complex scenarios such as organ transplantation. Precise adjustments to immunosuppressant therapy are crucial to balance the risks of rejection and infection, particularly in patients with compromised immune systems due to drug-induced agranulocytosis. In conclusion, this case serves as a reminder of the unpredictable nature of drug reactions and the importance of vigilant monitoring and rapid intervention in managing potentially life-threatening complications.

Management of immunosuppression in lung transplant recipients and COVID-19 outcomes: an observational retrospective cohort-study

BackgroundThe aim of this study was to assess the impact of immunosuppression management on coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outcomes.MethodsWe performed a single-center retrospective study in a cohort of 358 lung transplant recipients (LTx) over the period from March 2020 to April 2022. All included symptomatic patients had at least one positive SARS-CoV-2 rt-PCR. We used a composite primary outcome for COVID-19 including increased need for oxygen since the hospital admission, ICU transfer, and in-hospital mortality. We assessed by univariate and multivariate analyses the risk factors for poor outcomes.ResultsOverall, we included 91 LTx who contracted COVID-19. The COVID-19 in-hospital mortality rate reached 4.4%. By hierarchical clustering, we found a strong and independent association between the composite poor outcome and the discontinuation of at least one immunosuppressive molecule among tacrolimus, cyclosporine, mycophenolate mofetil, and everolimus. Obesity (OR = 16, 95%CI (1.96; 167), p = 0.01) and chronic renal failure (OR = 4.6, 95%CI (1.4; 18), p = 0.01) were also independently associated with the composite poor outcome. Conversely, full vaccination was protective (OR = 0.23, 95%CI (0.046; 0.89), p = 0.047).ConclusionThe administration of immunosuppressive drugs such as tacrolimus, cyclocporine or everolimus can have a protective effect in LTx with COVID-19, probably related to their intrinsic antiviral capacity.

#2313 Perspectives in immunosuppression management following post renal graft failure: a Portuguese national survey

Abstract Background and Aims The best approach to immunosuppression withdrawal post renal graft failure is controversial. Maintaining immunosuppressive therapy may preserve residual diuresis and prevent allosensitization, which is beneficial for a subsequent transplant. However, prolonged maintenance is associated with an increased risk of infection, metabolic side effects and neoplasia. No standardized protocol exists and immunosuppression is center and nephrologist dependent. Our aim was to document immunosuppression practices nationally amongst Portuguese nephrologists. Method A national survey of 5 short questions was conducted among residents and specialists in Nephrology in Portugal through email distribution by the Portuguese Society of Nephrology. Results We received a total of 90 responses, with 54.4% (n = 49) of participants working at a renal transplant unit. When faced with a patient returning to dialysis after graft loss, 66.7% (n = 60) immediately discontinue the antimetabolite, maintaining the calcineurin inhibitor and prednisolone, 33.3% (n = 30) maintain only the prednisolone and no respondent maintains mycophenolate mofetil or equivalent. Among those who maintain calcineurin inhibitors and steroids, 46.6% (n = 28) wean calcineurin inhibitor within 6 months to 1 year following graft loss, 23% (n = 14) discontinue calcineurin inhibitor within 3 to 6 months, and 30% (n = 18) discontinue calcineurin inhibitors before the first three months after graft loss. Considering steroids, 36.7% (N = 32) discontinue prednisone after one year post graft loss, and 64.3% (N = 58) of the Nephrologists maintain steroids indefinitely or until graft removal or steroid associated complications. The majority (83.3%, n = 75) agreed that the risk of the toxic rejection of the graft is the main factor deciding to maintain immunosuppression, followed by the possibility of re-transplantation (56.7%, n = 51) and the risk of infection was the major concern to withdrawal (55.6%, n = 50). All the participants considered this is an important or very important issue in kidney transplantation, that needs further investigation. Conclusion Immunosuppression management is one of the most challenging issues in patients with a failing or failed graft. Several working groups are being developed to discuss the best approach of the patients with a failing graft but only the British Transplantation Society have published guidelines. In this survey we can observe important disparity of different approaches, mostly physician/centre dependent. The current evidence is weak, calling the need for larger studies and a standardized protocol-based approach.

COVID-19 vaccinations and infections among individuals with systemic sclerosis: A Scleroderma Patient-centered Intervention Network (SPIN) Cohort study

Background/PurposeWe previously surveyed adults with systemic sclerosis (SSc) regarding COVID-19 vaccination in April-May 2021. The objective of the present study was to update through June-July 2022 and assess self-reported (1) COVID-19 vaccination rates, including boosters; (2) vaccine-related adverse events; (3) peri‑vaccination immunosuppressive medication management; (4) vaccine hesitancy; and (5) prevalence and severity of COVID-19 infections. MethodsIn April-May 2021 and June-July 2022, SPIN Cohort participants completed surveys on COVID-19 vaccination and infection. Primary vaccine series was defined according to the standard for each COVID-19 vaccine; additional vaccine administrations were considered booster doses. Fully vaccinated was defined as having completed a primary vaccine series and at least one booster dose. Results544 participants completed the 2021 survey only, 101 the 2022 survey only, and 388 both surveys. Among 489 participants with 2022 data, 437 (89 %) had received both primary and booster vaccines. Among all 1,033 participants, 960 (93 %) received at least one dose. At least one adverse reaction was reported by 34 % (330 of 960 participants) following first, 48 % (314 of 657 participants) following second, and 34 % (147 of 437 participants) following booster vaccine doses (primarily sore arm and fatigue); no severe adverse reactions were reported. SSc symptom worsening was reported in 6 % (53 of 960) after the first, 6 % after the second (39 of 657), and 4 % (17 of 437) after the booster dose. Of participants taking methotrexate or mycophenolate (including Cellcept or Myfortic), 34 of 266 (13 %) reported that they temporarily stopped or decreased their medication at the first dose, 32 of 215 (15 %) at the second dose, and 28 of 148 (19 %) for booster vaccination. Of 52 individuals not fully vaccinated with primary and booster doses in 2022, 29 (56 %) reported worry about vaccine related SSc flares. 172 of 489 (35 %) 2022 participants reported a history of at least one COVID-19 infection; 114 (66 %) occurred after receiving at least a primary vaccine series. Among initial COVID-19 infections, 9 (5 %) were asymptomatic, 66 (38 %) involved mild symptoms, 82 (48 %) moderate symptoms, and 15 (9 %) required hospitalization. ConclusionMost people with SSc in the study were fully vaccinated, and most continued their methotrexate or mycophenolate post-primary and booster vaccinations. Over half of vaccine-hesitant participants were concerned regarding risk of SSc flare; however, few vaccinated participants reported this. These data may be useful for counselling people with SSc regarding COVID-19 vaccine safety and outcomes.

Immunosuppression in liver transplant oncology: position paper of the Italian Board of Experts in Liver Transplantation (I-BELT).

Liver transplant oncology (TO) represents an area of increasing clinical and scientific interest including a heterogeneous group of clinical-pathological settings. Immunosuppressive management after LT is a key factor relevantly impacting result. However, disease-related guidance is still lacking, and many open questions remain in the field. Based on such a substantial lack of solid evidences, the Italian Board of Experts in Liver Transplantation (I-BELT) (a working group including representatives of all national transplant centers), unprecedently promoted a methodologically sound consensus conference on the topic, based on the GRADE approach. The group final recommendations are herein presented and commented. The 18 PICOs and Statements and their levels of evidence and grades of recommendation are reported and grouped into seven areas: (1) risk stratification by histopathological and bio-molecular parameters and role of mTORi post-LT; (2) steroids and HCC recurrence; (3) management of immunosuppression when HCC recurs after LT; (4) mTORi monotherapy; (5) machine perfusion and HCC recurrence after LT; (6) physiopathology of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and immunosuppression, the role of inflammation; (7) immunotherapy in liver transplanted patients. The interest in mammalian targets of rapamycin inhibitors (mTORi), for steroid avoidance and the need for a reduction to CNI exposure emerged from the consensus process. A selected list of unmet needs prompting further investigations have also been developed. The so far heterogeneous and granular approach to immunosuppression in oncologic patients deserves greater efforts for a more standardized therapeutic response to the different clinical scenarios. This consensus process makes a first unprecedented step in this direction, to be developed on a larger scale.

Management of immunosuppressive therapy after functional renal graft failure: results of a practice survey of French-speaking nephrologists

The management of patients with kidney transplant failure (KTF) remains a complex process involving multiple stakeholders. A working group of the Transplantation Commission of the French-speaking Society of Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplantation (SFNDT) conducted a survey on the management of immunosuppressants (IS) after KTF among nephrologists at transplant centres and general nephrologists in France, Switzerland and Belgium between March and June 2023. We analysed 232 replies from 58 nephrologists at transplant centres and 174 general nephrologists, aged 43.6 (+10.6) years. In the first three months following KTF, nephrologists reported discontinuing antimetabolite, calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) and corticosteroid treatment in 83%, 39.9% and 25.8% of cases respectively. Conversely, some nephrologists reported that they were continuing to use CNI (14%) and corticosteroids (19.1%) on a long-term basis. The patient’s comorbidities associated with the discontinuation of IS treatment are cancer and opportunistic infections as KT’s complications and presence of diabetes mellitus at KTF, whereas humoral rejection encourages the IS to be maintained. Transplantectomy is proposed by nephrologists most often for graft intolerance syndrome (86.5%), more rarely to discontinue IS (17.6%) or in the absence of plans of new transplantation (9.3%). In multivariate analyses, the presence of a protocol in the centre facilitated the management of IS by the general nephrologists. The management of IS after AFG by French-speaking nephrologists is heterogeneous. Specific prospective studies are needed to establish new best practice recommendations, based on more robust evidence, which could encourage better adherence by nephrologists.

OA15 A case series of idiopathic granulomatous mastitis patients and their immunosuppressive management

Abstract Background/Aims Rheumatologists are experts in managing immunosuppression and are asked to supervise immunosuppression for non-rheumatic conditions. Thus, it is important to be aware of these conditions and the regimes required. Idiopathic granulomatosis mastitis (IGM) is a rare inflammatory breast condition which can have systemic manifestations including arthritis. Methods Our index case presented with peripheral ankle synovitis/tenosynovitis, struggling to weight bear, whilst being investigated for a breast mass. Breast US, mammogram and biopsy (acute and chronic inflammatory cells including multi-nucleated giant cells) were completed and there was little response to 3 courses of antibiotics. No mycobacteria were seen on microscopy, ZN stain negative, CXR normal, T spot negative and serum ACE normal. There was no rash and no conditions associated with a seronegative spondyloarthropathy. RF, anti-CCP and ANA were negative. A moderate course of prednisolone immediately resolved the peripheral arthritis, but high-dose steroids were required to reduce the breast mass. The mass recurred upon weaning prednisolone requiring the addition of azathioprine as a steroid-sparing agent. Results Our case series includes the immunosuppressive management of 3 other IGM patients: 1) 43-year-old referred after an 8 year history of alternating breast ‘abscesses’ and sinuses treated with courses of antibiotics to little avail. High dose prednisolone and methotrexate resolved the breast mass within a month. 2) 37-year-old referred with a 14 year history of breast masses and fistulae previously treated with surgery and antibiotics. Currently asymptomatic so commenced on methotrexate. 3) 39-year-old referred with a 3 year history of recurrent sterile breast abscesses previously managed with antibiotics, incision and drainage. Recent small masses had settled with NSAIDs. Conclusion IGM is a rare benign inflammatory breast disease of unknown aetiology, commonest in Middle Eastern populations, median age 30s. The most common presentation is a unilateral painful mass, which can ulcerate, fistulate and form abscesses. Management of IGM varies from expectant/topical steroids/NSAIDs to high dose steroids and DMARDs. A literature review shows that the usual starting dose of prednisolone is 40-60mg; the addition of methotrexate and azathioprine increases likelihood of successful treatment and allows for faster steroid tapering. Surgery for specific types of IGM can also be useful; for example, where there is duct granuloma, surgical excision can be curative. IGM can associate with arthritis, erythema nodosum, and episcleritis. One case series found that 14% of patients with IGM had concomitant arthritis. Key points: In our local experience we have had four patients with IGM, all previously treated with antibiotics or surgical methods but subsequently diagnosed with IGM and referred for immunosuppressive therapy. Being a rare condition, we feel it’s important for clinicians to be aware of IGM and its link with inflammatory arthritis. Disclosure S. Islam: None. P. Stonelake: None. H. John: None.

Clinical relevance of HLA-DQ eplet mismatch and maintenance immunosuppression with risk of allosensitization after kidney transplant failure.

The optimal immunosuppression management in patients with a failed kidney transplant remains uncertain. This study analyzed the association of class II HLA eplet mismatches and maintenance immunosuppression with allosensitization after graft failure in a well characterized cohort of 21 patients who failed a first kidney transplant. A clinically meaningful increase in cPRA in this study was defined as the cPRA that resulted in 50% reduction in the compatible donor pool measured from the time of transplant failure until the time of repeat transplantation, death, or end of study. The median cPRA at the time of failure was 12.13% (interquartile ranges = 0.00%, 83.72%) which increased to 62.76% (IQR = 4.34%, 99.18%) during the median follow-up of 27 (IQR = 18, 39) months. High HLA-DQ eplet mismatches were significantly associated with an increased risk of developing a clinically meaningful increase in cPRA (p = 0.02) and de novo DQ donor-specific antibody against the failed allograft (p = 0.02). We did not observe these associations in patients with high HLA-DR eplet mismatches. Most of the patients (88%) with a clinically meaningful increase in cPRA had both a high DQ eplet mismatch and a reduction in their immunosuppression, suggesting the association is modified by immunosuppression. The findings suggest HLA-DQ eplet mismatch analysis may serve as a useful tool to guide future clinical studies and trials which assess the management of immunosuppression in transplant failure patients who are repeat transplant candidates.

Pediatric Transplant Experience from a Single Center in South India

Background and Objective: Pediatric renal transplantation is a life-saving procedure for children with end-stage renal disease. This study aims to analyze the outcomes of pediatric renal transplants at our center, focusing on patient demographics, donor sources, surgical techniques, posttransplant complications, graft survival, and rejection rates. Methodology: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 43 pediatric kidney transplant recipients. Data on recipient age, gender, donor type, pretransplant dialysis, donor characteristics, surgical techniques, native kidney disease, induction therapy, maintenance immunosuppression, posttransplant infections, graft survival, and rejection episodes were collected and analyzed. Results: We performed 43 pediatric kidney transplants in total. The average age was 13.7 years (±3.81), with 8 (18.6%) being under the age of ten, 11 (25.6%) being between the ages of eleven and fourteen, and 24 (55.8%) being between the ages of fifteen and eighteen. There were 43 recipients: 27 males and 16 females. There were four (9.3%) deceased donor renal transplants and 39 (90.7%) live-related kidney transplants. Right internal iliac artery and right external iliac vein anastomosis were found in 32 (74.4%) cases, right external iliac artery and right external iliac vein in 9 (20.9%), right common iliac artery and right common iliac vein in 1 (2.3%), and right common iliac and right internal iliac in 1 (2.3%). Induction was used in 27 recipients (62.8%). Graft survival was seen at 1 year in 42 (97.7%) patients and at 5 years in 34 (81%). Biopsy-proven rejection occurred in 22 (51.2%) of the recipients, with antibody-mediated rejection occurring in 8 (18.6%) and cellular rejection occurring in 22 (51.2%). Graft loss was caused by acute cellular rejection in three (23.1%) cases, graft pyelonephritis in 2 (15.4%), and an unknown cause in 2 (15.4%). There were no significant connections with antibody-mediated rejection. Conclusion: Our study provides valuable insights into the outcomes of pediatric renal transplantation at our center. Despite the challenges of graft rejection and posttransplant infections, favorable graft survival rates were achieved. Cellular rejection emerged as a significant risk factor for graft survival, highlighting the importance of effective immunosuppressive management. Our findings emphasize the need for close follow-up, infection control measures, and individualized immunosuppressive strategies to optimize long-term outcomes in pediatric renal transplant recipients. Further research is warranted to refine protocols and address the specific needs of this vulnerable patient population.