Immunonutrition In Patients Research Articles

Effectiveness of Preoperative Immunonutrition in Improving Surgical Outcomes after Radical Cystectomy for Bladder Cancer: Study Protocol for a Multicentre, Open-Label, Randomised Trial (INu-RC).

Radical cystectomy (RC) with pelvic lymph node dissection is the standard treatment for patients with limited-stage muscle-invasive bladder cancer. RC is associated with a complication rate of approximately 50-88%. Immunonutrition (IMN) refers to the administration of substrates, such as omega-3 fatty acids, arginine, glutamine, and nucleotides, that modulate the immune response. IMN has been associated with improved outcomes following surgery for esophagogastric, colorectal and pancreatic cancer. In this paper, we describe a study protocol for a multicentre, randomised, open-label clinical trial to evaluate the effect of IMN in patients undergoing RC for bladder cancer. A 7-day preoperative course of IMN is compared with a standard high-calorie high-protein oral nutritional supplement. The primary outcome of this study is the rate of complications (infectious, wound-related, gastrointestinal, and urinary complications) in the first 30 days after RC. Secondary outcomes include time to recovery of bowel function and postoperative mobilisation, changes in muscle strength and body weight, biochemical modifications, need for blood transfusion, length of stay, readmission rate, and mortality. The results of this study may provide new insights into the impact of IMN on postoperative outcomes after RC and may help improve IMN prescribing based on patient nutritional status parameters.

Impact of Perioperative Immunonutrition on Postoperative Outcomes in Patients with Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

There is no consensus on the efficacy of perioperative immunonutrition in patients with upper gastrointestinal (GI) cancer surgery. We clarified the impact of perioperative immunonutrition on postoperative outcomes in patients with upper GI cancers. We searched MEDLINE (PubMed), MEDLINE (OVID), EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science Core Selection, and Emcare from 1981-2022 using search terms related to immunonutrition and upper GI cancer. We included randomized controlled trials. Intervention was defined as immunonutritional therapy, including arginine, n-3 omega fatty acids, or glutamine during the perioperative period. The control was defined as standard nutritional therapy. The primary outcomes were infectious complications, defined as events with a Clavien-Dindo classification grade ≥ II that occurred within 30 days after surgery. After screening, 23 studies were included in the qualitative synthesis and in the quantitative synthesis. The meta-analysis showed that immunonutrition reduced infectious complications (relative risk ratio: 0.72; 95% confidence interval: 0.57-0.92; certainty of evidence: Moderate) compared with standard nutritional therapy. In conclusion, nutritional intervention with perioperative immunonutrition in patients with upper GI cancers significantly reduced infectious complications. The effect of immunonutrition for upper GI cancers in reducing the risk of infectious complications was about 30%.

Impact of Perioperative Immunonutrition on Postoperative Outcomes for Patients Undergoing Head and Neck or Gastrointestinal Cancer Surgeries: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

To clarify whether perioperative immunonutrition is effective in adult patients with or without malnutrition undergoing elective surgery for head and neck (HAN) or gastrointestinal (GI) cancers. It is important to avoid postoperative complications in patients with cancer as they can compromise clinical outcomes. There is no consensus on the efficacy of perioperative immunonutrition in patients with or without malnutrition undergoing HAN or GI cancer surgery. We searched MEDLINE (PubMed), MEDLINE (OVID), EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science Core Selection, and Emcare from 1981 to 2022 using search terms related to immunonutrition and HAN or GI cancer. We included randomized controlled trials. Intervention was defined as immunonutritional therapy including arginine, n-3 omega fatty acids, or glutamine during the perioperative period. The control was defined as standard nutritional therapy. The primary outcomes were total postoperative and infectious complications, defined as events with a Clavien-Dindo classification grade ≥ II that occurred within 30 days after surgery. Of the 4825 patients from 48 included studies, 19 had upper GI cancer, 9 had lower, and 8 had mixed cancer, whereas 12 had HAN cancers. Immunonutrition reduced the total postoperative complications (relative risk ratio: 0.78; 95% CI, 0.66-0.93; certainty of evidence: high) and infectious complications (relative risk ratio: 0.71; 95% CI, 0.61-0.82; certainty of evidence: high) compared with standard nutritional therapy. Nutritional intervention with perioperative immunonutrition in patients with HAN and GI cancers significantly reduced total postoperative complications and infectious complications.

Phase Angle and Postoperative Complications in a Model of Immunonutrition in Patients with Pancreatic Cancer.

The aim of this study was to determine the influence of our own model of immunonutrition on phase angle and postoperative complications. Our goal was to establish modern prehabilitation procedures for patients operated on for pancreatic cancer. Patients with pancreatic cancer who qualified for surgical treatment were divided into two groups. Group I (20 patients; 12 with pancreatic head cancer, 8 with pancreatic tail/body cancer) was given immunonutrition (Impact Oral 3× a day, 237 mL, for 5 days before surgery, and after surgery for an average of 3.5 days). Group II (20 patients; 12 with pancreatic head cancer, 8 with pancreatic tail/body cancer) did not receive immunonutrition. Body weight, body mass index and phase angle were assessed on admission to the hospital, after preoperative immunonutrition, on the third and eighth postoperative days. C-reactive protein and Interleukin-1 α were measured on admission to the hospital, after preoperative immunonutrition, on the eighth postoperative day. Postsurgical complications were assessed via Clavien-Dindo classification. On admission to the hospital, the phase angle was 5.0° (4.70-5.85) in Group I and 5.1° (5.00-6.25) in Group II. After 5 days of using preoperative immunonutrition, it increased statistically significantly (p < 0.02) to 5.35°. In Group I, on the third day after surgery, it decreased statistically significantly (p < 0.001) to 4.65°, and then, increased to 4.85° on the eighth day. In Group II, statistically significant decreases in the phase angle were observed on the third (4.5°; p < 0.002) and eighth (4.55°; p < 0.008) days after surgery. A statistically significant increase in CRP (86.6 mg/dL; p < 0.02) and IL-1α (18.5 pg/mL; p < 0.03) levels was observed on the eighth day after surgery in this group. In Group I, a statistically significant negative correlation (R -0.501106; p < 0.002) of the phase angle after 5 days of preoperative immunonutrition with postoperative complications was observed. This study used our own model of immunonutrition in patients undergoing surgery for pancreatic cancer. The applied model of perioperative IN improved the postoperative course of patients operated on due to pancreatic cancer. Fewer complications were observed in patients in the group receiving IN. Also, the PA value increased after the 5-day preoperative IN, and the use of perioperative IN improved the PA value on the eighth postoperative day compared to the group that did not receive IN. On this day, an increase in inflammatory parameters was also observed in the group that did not receive IN. In addition, PA correlated negatively with complications. The PA can be a useful tool to assess the effectiveness of the applied IN, and thus, to predict the occurrence of postoperative complications. Therefore, there is a further need for studies on larger groups of patients.

Immunonutrition in patients who underwent major abdominal surgery: A comprehensive systematic review and component network metanalysis using GRADE and CINeMA approaches

BackgroundThe benefits of immunonutrition in patients who underwent major abdominal surgery have been recently established, but the optimal combination of immunonutrients has remained unclear. The aim is to clarify this point. MethodsA systematic search of randomized clinical trials about immunonutrition in major abdominal surgery was made. A frequentist random-effects component network meta-analysis was conducted, reporting the P score and odds ratio or mean difference with a 95% confidence interval. The best components and best plausible strategies were described. The critical endpoints were morbidity and mortality rates. The important endpoints were infectious complication rate and length of stay. ResultsThe meta-analysis includes 87 studies and 8,375 patients. The best approach for morbidity rate, with a moderate grade of certainty, was the use of perioperative enteral/oral immunonutrition with arginine, glutamine, and polyunsaturated fatty acids (odds ratio 0.32; 0.10 to 0.98; P score of 0.93). The mortality rate was reduced by postoperative enteral immunonutrition with RNA, arginine, and polyunsaturated fatty acids (odds ratio 59; 0.29 to 1.22; P score 0.84) but with a low grade of certainty. No significant heterogeneity or incoherence is observed. The length of stay and infectious results are “at risk” for high heterogeneity or network meta-analysis incoherence. The component analysis confirmed that postoperative oral/enteral use of 2 or 3 components is crucial to reducing morbidity rate. ConclusionThe oral/enteral immunonutrition in the postoperative period, with multiple immunonutrients, can reduce the morbidity rate in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery. The effect of immunonutrition on mortality, infectious disease, and length of stay is unclear.

Role of preoperative immunonutrition in patients with colorectal cancer: a narrative review

Role of preoperative immunonutrition in patients with colorectal cancer: a narrative review

Immunonutrition in Radical Cystectomy: State of the Art and Perspectives.

Preoperative nutritional status is a pivotal aspect to consider in patients with cancer undergoing radical cystectomy (RC), as those at risk of malnutrition or already malnourished are more prone to post-surgical complications. The loss of muscle mass is a major consequence of cancer-related malnutrition. It is associated with increased risk of hospital readmission, longer hospitalization, and higher mortality. Nowadays, the close relationship between nutritional and immunological aspects under stressful conditions, such as surgery, represents an emerging scientific and clinical issue. Indeed, the synergistic action of reduced food intake and systemic inflammation generates metabolic derangements with tissue catabolism, including skeletal muscle breakdown, which is, in turn, associated with immune system dysfunction. In order to offer an additional immune-nutritional boost to the post-surgical phase, particularly in malnourished patients, nutritional support may include oral nutritional supplements and/or enteral formulas enriched with specific nutrients such as omega-3 fatty acids, arginine, glutamine, and nucleotides, with acknowledged immune-modulating effects. In the present narrative review, we addressed the state of the art of the available scientific literature on the benefit of immunonutrition in patients undergoing RC for cancer and suggest possible future perspectives to be explored. Although the role of immunonutrition was found to be little explored in the context of urologic oncology, the preliminary available data on radical cystectomy, summarized in the present paper, are promising and suggest that it may improve postoperative outcomes through immunomodulation, regardless of nutritional status before surgery.

The Effect of immunonutrition in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BackgroundPancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is a complex and traumatic abdominal surgery with a high risk of postoperative complications. Nutritional support, including immunonutrition (IMN) with added glutamine, arginine, and ω-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids, can improve patients’ prognosis by regulating postoperative inflammatory response. However, the effects of IMN on PD patients’ outcomes require further investigation.MethodsPMC, EMbase, web of science databases were used to search literatures related to IMN and PD. Data such as length of hospital stay, infectious complications, non-infectious complications, postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF), delayed gastric emptying (DGE), mortality, systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) duration, IL-6, and C-reactive protein (CRP) were extracted, and meta-analyses were performed on these data to study their pooled results, heterogeneity, and publication bias.ResultsThis meta-analysis involved 10 studies and a total of 572 patients. The results showed that the use of IMN significantly reduced the length of hospital stay for PD patients (MD = -2.31; 95% CI = -4.43, -0.18; P = 0.03) with low heterogeneity. Additionally, the incidence of infectious complications was significantly reduced (MD = 0.42; 95% CI = 0.18, 1.00, P = 0.05), with low heterogeneity after excluding one study. However, there was no significant impact on non-infectious complications, the incidence of POPF and DGE, mortality rates, duration of SIRS, levels of IL-6 and CRP.ConclusionThe use of IMN has been shown to significantly shorten hospital stays and decrease the frequency of infectious complications in PD patients. Early implementation of IMN is recommended for those undergoing PD. However, further research is needed to fully assess the impact of IMN on PD patients through larger and higher-quality studies.

Effects of Immunonutrition on Cancer Patients Undergoing Surgery: A Scoping Review.

There is a large body of evidence about immunonutrition formulas; however, there are still doubts about their usefulness in routine clinical practice as compared with standard formulas. In the age of personalized medicine, new studies appear every year regarding several types of patients; therefore, an updated point of view on these formulas is necessary. The Embase database was searched from 2016 to 14 March 2022. Our criteria were articles published in English and Spanish. The evidence quality was evaluated using GRADEpro, and the review was developed according to the PRISMA statement. In this review, a total of 65 unique records were retrieved; however, 36 articles did not meet the inclusion criteria and were thus excluded. In total, 29 articles were included in the final analysis. In the last few years, many meta-analyses have attempted to identify additional existing studies of surgical patients with certain pathologies, mainly oncological patients. Immunonutrition prior to oncological surgery was shown to cause a decrease in inflammatory markers in most of the studies, and the main clinical events that changed were the infectious complications after surgery. The length of stay and mortality data are controversial due to the specific risk factors associated with these events. The use of immunonutrition in patients who have undergone oncological surgery decreases the levels of inflammatory markers and infectious postoperative complications in almost all localizations. However, more studies are needed to assess the use of immunonutrition based on Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols.

Value of immunonutrition in patients undergoing pancreatic resection: a trial sequential meta-analysis

BackgroundThe benefits of immunonutrition (IM) in patients who underwent pancreatic surgery are unclear. MethodsA meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing IM with standard nutrition (SN) in pancreatic surgery was carried out. A random-effects trial sequential meta-analysis was made, reporting Risk Ratio (RR), mean difference (MD), and required information size (RIS). If RIS was reached, false negative (type II error) and positive results (type I error) could be excluded. The endpoints were morbidity, mortality, infectious complication, postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) rates, and length of stay (LOS). ResultsThe meta-analysis includes 6 RCTs and 477 patients. Morbidity (RR 0.77; 0.26 to 2.25), mortality (RR 0.90; 0.76 to 1.07), and POPF rates were similar. The RISs were 17,316, 7,417, and 464,006, suggesting a type II error. Infectious complications were lower in the IM group, with a RR of 0.54 (0.36–0.79; 95 CI). The LOS was shorter in IM (MD -0.3 days; −0.6 to −0.1). For both, the RISs were reached, excluding type I error. ConclusionThe IM can reduce infectious complications and LOS The small differences in mortality, morbidity, and POPF make it impossible to exclude type II error due to large RISs.

Multicentre, randomised, open-label, parallel-group, clinical phase II study to evaluate immunonutrition in improving efficacy of immunotherapy in patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer, undergoing systematic nutritional counseling

BackgroundNutritional support, including nutritional counseling and oral nutritional supplements (ONS), has been recommended as a first-line strategy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Evidence on the efficacy of immunonutrition during immunotherapy in these patients is positive, but still limited some secondary endpoints, such as treatment toxicity and tolerance. We hypothesize that early systematic provision of ONS with a high-protein-high calorie mixture containing immunonutrients (Impact®) in addition to nutritional counseling, compared to nutritional counseling alone, is beneficial to patients with NSCLC receiving immunotherapy with or without chemotherapy.We designed the present study to evaluate the efficacy of early systematic provision of ONS enriched with immunonutrients compared to nutritional counseling alone, in patients with NSCLC undergoing immunotherapy. Study endpoints were: treatment response (primary endpoint: progression-free survival), treatment tolerance and toxicity, body weight, body composition, protein-calorie intake, quality of life, fatigue, muscle strength and immunological profile.MethodsThis is a pragmatic, multicentre, randomized (1:1), parallel-group, open label, controlled, pilot clinical trial (N = 180).DiscussionThe improvement of efficacy of nutritional support in oncology still deserves many efforts. Immunonutrition represents a promising approach also in patients with NSCLC, but evidence on its efficacy on clinical outcomes during immunotherapy is still inconclusive. The present pilot study, which guarantees early high-quality nutritional care (assessment and treatment) to all patients in agreement with current guidelines and recommendations, could represent one of the first proofs of efficacy of early oral immunonutrition in patients with cancer undergoing immunotherapy. Further large randomized trials addressing the improvement of supportive care could be hypothesized, accordingly.Trial registrationThis study is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05384873.

SP5.2.9 Perioperative immunonutrition in reducing the infectious complications in patients undergoing colorectal cancer resections: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Abstract Objective Perioperative nutritional interventions have been reported to improve colorectal rectal cancer surgery outcomes. The objective of this article is to assess the influences of immunonutrition intervention during perioperative period in patients undergoing colorectal cancer resections. Method Meta-analysis was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. Systematic search of medical databases like MEBASE, MEDLINE and pubmed was performed to find studies exclusively reporting the perioperative use of immunonutrition in patients undergoing colorectal cancer resections and relevant published randomized, controlled trials (RCT) were shortlisted according to the inclusion criteria. The analysis of the pooled data was done using the RevMan statistical software. Result Ten RCTs on 1218 patients with colorectal cancer fulfilled the inclusion criteria. In the random effects model analysis, the use of perioperative immunonutrition in patients undergoing colorectal cancer resections statistically reduced the risk [odds ratio 0.59, 95% CI (0.35–1.0), z= 1.96, p=0.05] of infectious complications. However, there was significant heterogeneity [Tau2 = 0.35; Chi2= 19.11, df = 9 (P &amp;lt; 0.02; I2 = 53%)] among included studies. The variables of postoperative mortality [odds ratio 2.1, 95% CI (0.33–12.36), z= 0.75, p=0.45] and length of hospitalization [standardized mean difference 0.16, 95% CI (-0.08–0.39), z= 1.31, p=0.19] were statistically similar in patients using immunonutrition or standard conventional perioperative nutrition. Conclusion Perioperative immunonutrition in patients undergoing colorectal resections seems to reduce infectious complications but this study failed to demonstrate its role in reducing the postoperative mortality and length of hospitalization.

Benefits of immunonutrition in patients with head and neck cancer receiving chemoradiation: A phase II randomized, double-blind study

The benefits of immunonutrition in patients with head and neck cancer (HNC), especially for those undergoing definitive concurrent chemoradiation (CCRT), remain unclear. We evaluated the benefits of immunonutrition regarding the prevention of severe oral mucositis. Secondary objectives included assessments of other treatment-related toxicities, changes of nutritional and inflammatory marker levels, treatment tolerance, and survival. In total, 110 patients with HNC undergoing definitive CCRT including 3-week cycles of cisplatin were enrolled in our double-blind phase II study. Patients were randomly assigned to receive an immunonutrient formula containing omega-3-fatty acids, arginine, dietary nucleotides, and soluble fiber (n=55) or an isocaloric isonitrogenous control (n=55). All patients received the assigned product 5 consecutive days before each chemotherapy session. The proportion of patients with severe oral mucositis was compared between the immunonutrients and control groups. The rates of nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC) were 67% and 51% in the immunonutrients and control groups, respectively. All patients had 100% compliance to the assigned product. There was no difference of the proportion of patients with grade 3-4 oral mucositis between the two groups (62% vs. 67%, p=0.690). At the time of analyses, survival tended to be better in the immunonutrients group. The 3-year progression-free survival rates were 69% (95% confidence interval [CI]=55%-80%) and 44% (95% CI=30%-57%) in the immunonutrients and control groups, respectively (p=0.056), whereas the 3-year overall survival rates in these groups were 69% (95% CI=54%-80%) and 50% (95% CI=36%-66%; p=0.065), respectively. In subgroup analyses according to the primary tumor location, the survival benefits were apparently maintained in patients with NPC. Although our study did not demonstrate a reduced risk of severe oral mucositis, we found that immunonutrition might improve survival. Larger studies are needed to determine the optimal dose and schedule of immunonutrition to prevent oral mucositis. In addition, randomized phase III trials evaluating the survival benefits of immunonutrition in patients with cancer are required, and NPC might be a primary malignancy of interest. ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT05101889.

Impact of perioperative enteral immunonutrition in patients with gastrointestinal cancer undergoing elective surgery: a randomized controlled trial

Rationale: Major cancer surgery poses a significant risk to patient’s nutritional intake, especially among gastrointestinal cancer patients. Patients are often at high risk of a remarkable weight loss and impaired functional capacity after surgery. The aim of our study is to investigate the effects of two immune-modulating formulas on nutritional status and functional capacities in patients undergoing elective surgery.

An emerging role for immuno-nutrition in patients undergoing radical cystectomy

An emerging role for immuno-nutrition in patients undergoing radical cystectomy

The effect of immunonutrition in patients with acute pancreatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

The effect of immunonutrition is controversial compared to standard supplementation with respect to the management of patients with acute pancreatitis. An online literature search on four databases (PubMed, Cochrane, Embase and Web of Science) was performed to identify all of the randomised controlled trials assessing the effects of enteral or parenteral immunonutrition in acute pancreatitis. A fixed or random effects model was chosen using revman, version 5.3 (https://revman.cochrane.org). The count data were analysed using the risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). Five hundred and sixty-eight patients were included via our search in which 14 articles matched our criteria for enrolling the meta-analysis. Immunonutrition significantly reduced the risk of organ failure (RR=0.42; 95% CI=0.26-0.70, P=0.0008), infectious complications (RR=0.78; 95% CI=0.62-0.99; P=0.04) and mortality (RR=0.37; 95% CI=0.21-0.66; P=0.006). Length of hospital stay was also shorter in patients who received immunonutrition (mean difference=-1.73days; 95% CI=-2.36 to -1.10; P<0.00001). Total interventions of patients were decreased (RR=0.73; 95% CI=0.55-0.97; P=0.03). Body mass index in patients with immunonutrition was reduced more than standard nutrition (mean difference=-2.00; 95% CI=-3.96 to -0.04; P=0.05). Immunonutrition support such as glutamine and ω-3 fatty acids is potentially beneficial with respect to improving clinical outcomes in patients with acute pancreatitis.

Immunonutrition in Patients with Pancreatic Cancer Undergoing Surgical Intervention: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Immunonutrition is administered to improve the outcome of patients with pancreatic cancer undergoing surgery. However, its effect and mechanism of action remain unclear. Therefore, we conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis to assess its effects on postoperative outcome and the immune system. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were identified and data extracted by two reviewers independently from electronic databases from their inception to 31 October 2019. The result was expressed as the risk ratio (RR) for categorical variables and mean difference (MD) for continuous variables with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Six RCTs published from 1999 and 2016, with a total of 368 patients, were included. The results revealed that immunonutrition significantly decreased the rate of infectious complications (RR = 0.47, 95% CI (0.23, 0.94), p = 0.03) and the length of hospital stay (MD = −1.90, 95% CI (−3.78, −0.02), p = 0.05) by modulating the immune system, especially in preoperative group in subgroup analysis. We therefore recommend that patients with pancreatic cancer undergoing surgery could take the advantage of immunonutrition, especially in the preoperative period.

The Role of Immunonutrition in Patients Undergoing Pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is one of the most difficult and complex surgical procedures in abdominal surgery. Malnutrition and immune dysfunction in patients with pancreatic cancer (PC) may lead to a higher risk of postoperative infectious complications. Although immunonutrition (IN) is recommended for enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in patients undergoing PD for 5–7 days perioperatively, its role in patients undergoing pancreatectomy is still unclear and controversial. It is known that the proper surgical technique is very important in order to reduce a risk of postoperative complications, such as a pancreatic fistula, and to improve disease-free survival in patients following PD. However, it has been proven that IN decreases the risk of infectious complications, and shortens hospital stays in patients undergoing PD. This is a result of the impact on altered inflammatory responses in patients with cancer. Both enteral and parenteral, as well as preoperative and postoperative IN, using various nutrients, such as glutamine, arginine, omega-3 fatty acids and nucleotides, is administered. The most frequently used preoperative oral supplementation is recommended. The aim of this paper is to present the indications and benefits of IN in patients undergoing PD.

Effect of preoperative immunonutrition on outcomes of colon cancer surgery: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

BackgroundCurrent guidelines recommend the prescription of immune-enriched oral nutritional supplements for malnourished patients before major gastrointestinal surgery. However, the benefit of preoperative immunonutrition is still controversial. This randomized controlled trial aims to evaluate the effect of preoperative immunonutrition on the outcomes of surgery for colon cancer.Methods/designPatients with primary colon cancer will be included as study participants after screening. They will be randomly assigned (in a ratio of 1:1) to receive preoperative immunonutrition added to the normal diet (experimental arm) or consume normal diet alone (control arm). Patients in the experimental arm will receive oral supplementation (400 mL/day) with arginine and ω-3 fatty acids for 7 days before elective surgery. The primary endpoint is the rate of infectious complications, while the secondary endpoints are postoperative complication rate, change in body weight, length of hospital stay, and nature of fecal microbiome. The authors hypothesize that the rate of infectious complications would be 13% in the experimental arm and 30% in the control arm. With a two-sided alpha of 0.05 and a power of 0.8, the sample size is calculated as 176 patients (88 per arm).DiscussionAlthough there have been many studies demonstrating significant benefits of preoperative immunonutrition, these were limited by a small sample size and potential publication bias. Despite the recommendation of immunonutrition before surgery in nutritional guidelines, its role in reduction of rate of infectious complications is still controversial. This trial is expected to provide evidence for the benefits of administration of preoperative immunonutrition in patients with colon cancer.Trial registrationClinical Research Information Service KCT0003770. Registered on 15 April 2019.

Effects of Immunonutrition in Patients With Pneumonia

Effects of Immunonutrition in Patients With Pneumonia