Immune Platelet Refractoriness Research Articles

Platelet antibody detection assays: a single-laboratory comparison of MAIPA, PIFT, and microsphere-based multiplex assays Pak-Lx

Background and ObjectivesThe identification of platelet antibodies is essential for diagnosing and managing conditions such as fetal and neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenic purpura, post-transfusion purpura, and immune platelet refractoriness. Monoclonal antibody immobilization of platelet antigens (MAIPA) is the standard method for detecting anti-human platelet antigen (HPA) antibodies, while the detection of anti-HLA antibodies once relied on the complement-dependent cytotoxicity method, however advanced technologies such as enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and Luminex have significantly improved sensitivity and accuracy in identifying these antibodies. Flow cytometry-based techniques (platelet immunofluorescence test - PIFT) and Luminex platform-driven microsphere-based multiplex assays (Pak-Lx) are widely employed in platelet immunology laboratories owing to their remarkable flexibility and versatility. The present study compared the sensitivity, specificity, and concordance of these different serological techniques used in platelet antibody identification. Material and MethodsOne hundred serum samples from patients suspected of immune-mediated platelet disorders were examined. Initially, the samples underwent testing using the MAIPA method. Subsequently, the results were compared with three alternative methods: PIFT and microsphere-based multiplex assays for both HLA and HPA antibodies. ResultsPak-Lx demonstrated a 94 % agreement with MAIPA, while PIFT had 88 % agreement for HPA antibodies. For HLA antibody detection, Pak-Lx versus DLX had 75 % concordance, MAIPA versus DLX showed 77 %, and PIFT versus DLX displayed an 81 % concordance rate. Remarkably, there were no significant differences in concordance levels between Pak-Lx and PIFT compared to MAIPA and DLX for anti-HPA and HLA antibodies, respectively. ConclusionThis study found no significant differences in concordance among the tested assays for detecting anti-HPA and anti-HLA antibodies. These data suggest that no single method can detect all clinically important antibodies. Therefore, it is advisable that each laboratory develops customized protocols based on their expertise and employs complementary methods for comprehensive patient assessments.

The importance of ABO in platelet refractoriness, an often overlooked option.

ABO-non-identical (ni) platelets provide less of an increase in platelet count and may increase the length of patient transfusions. The paper by Han and Badami showed that ABO-ni platelets may be a risk factor for immune platelet transfusion refractoriness. Commentary on: Han etal. ABO non-identical platelet transfusions, immune platelet refractoriness and platelet support. Br J Haematol 2024;204:2097-2102.

ABO non-identical platelet transfusions, immune platelet refractoriness and platelet support.

ABO-non-identical (ABO-ni) platelets may be another risk factor for immune platelet transfusion refractoriness (i-PTR). We examined the effect of such platelets on i-PTR and subsequent platelet support through retrospective analysis of 17 322 New Zealand patients receiving ≥1 platelets. Immune PTR was defined as PTR with anti-HLA-I/HPA positivity. Univariate and multivariate analyses determined the independent risk factors for i-PTR. One hundred and eighty-eight patients (1.1%) had i-PTR and received more ABO-ni platelets than non-refractory patients (53.2% vs. 29.5%; p < 0.001). More non-O than group O patients had received ABO-ni platelets before i-PTR diagnosis (67.6% vs. 32.5%; p < 0.001). Female sex (p < 0.001), age ≤ 60 years (p = 0.004), haematology patients (p < 0.001) and ≥2 ABO-ni platelets (p < 0.001) were the independent risk factors for i-PTR. More i-PTR patients with anti-HLA-I were non-O compared to group O (90.1% vs. 75.3%; p = 0.007). More with anti-HLA-I + anti-HPA were group O than non-O (24.7% vs. 9.0%; p = 0.003). ABO-ni platelet-exposed i-PTR patients required matched platelets for longer than those receiving only ABO-i platelets (96.5 vs. 59.0 days; p = 0.02). ABO-ni platelets may be a risk factor for i-PTR with dose effect. ABO-i platelets should be considered whenever possible for at-risk patients.

Virtual platelet cross-matching as transfusion management for patients with immune platelet refractoriness.

This study describes the use of the Epvix platform for virtual cross-matching (VC) of human leucocyte antigen (HLA)-compatible platelets for patients with immune platelet refractoriness, and demonstrates effectiveness of the selected platelets. A prospective cohort of haematological patients was evaluated from 2018 to 2022. HLA-typed donor bank profile was previously uploaded to the Epvix platform. Each patient's antibody reactivity panel (PRA) was included in the platform. Then, search, selection and VC were performed, and 24-h-corrected count increment (CCI) platelet transfusion was calculated (reference ≥2500). Six patients were included (four female, two male), with mean age of 61 years. HLA antibodies were detected as the cause of immunity for all patients, whereas four patients also had non-immune causes. High percentage of alloimmunization was detected in all studied patients (mean PRA: 85.7%). Thirty different donors were able to schedule and perform platelet donations. The mean 24-h CCI count was 9882. All platelet transfusions achieved a satisfactory CCI count except for two transfusion events. Presence of non-immune causes identified in these two cases could account for the unsatisfactory CCI. Epvix is a free application hosted on the Web and uses the HLAMatchmaker algorithm to generate histocompatibility reports. This study demonstrates the efficiency of VC performed by Epvix. However, physical cross-matching will still be necessary in some instances, as the platform does not support human platelet antigen polymorphism.

The relevance of a bank with genotyped platelets donors

ObjectiveDescribe the clinical and laboratory characteristics and the transfusion strategy of patients at Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein with platelet refractoriness and identify their etiological characteristics. Standardize the platelet immunofluorescence technique by flow cytometry as a test for platelet compatibility in immune platelet refractoriness in transfusion support. MethodsReview of medical records of refractory platelet patients followed at HIAE from January 2011 to May 2017. Clinical-demographic data, laboratory data and identification of the use of compatible genotyped platelets for patients in need of transfusion therapy were collected. The analyzed patients were classified according to the etiology of their platelet refractoriness. To standardize the FC-PIFT technique, blood group O platelets were incubated with serum from blood group AB donors and anti-IgG monoclonal antibody to determine the negative control. In order to verify the influence of the ABO system, monoclonal anti-IgG antibodies were incubated with blood group A or B platelets and with blood group O donor serum with isohemagglutinins below and above 1/64. ResultsA total of 47 patients were evaluated, a 51% (24/47) preponderance of associated immune and non-immune factors (NIPR + IPR). The most common causes of NIPR + IPR were splenomegaly (54%) and the development of HLA antibodies (88%), consistent with the literature. For patients who required therapeutic transfusion, only a small portion received compatible genotyped platelets. ConclusionAlthough 60% of patients could benefit from the therapeutic transfusion of genotyped platelets, only 10% were actually transfused with this type of blood component. This reaffirms the need for investments in a bank of genotyped platelet donors.

Human Leukocyte Antigen Alloimmunization and Alloimmune Platelet Refractoriness.

Despite significant advancements in the production of platelet products, storage, and transfusion, transfusion refractoriness remains a significant clinical problem, affecting up to 14% of hematological patients receiving platelet transfusions. Human leukocyte antigen (HLA) alloimmunization is a major cause of immune platelet refractoriness, and its rate can be significantly reduced by implementation of leukoreduction. Despite promising preclinical results, pathogen reduction does not reduce HLA alloimmunization. Patients with HLA alloimmune refractoriness are usually managed with HLA-selected platelet transfusions. In this review, we describe the pathophysiology of HLA alloimmunization and alloimmune refractoriness, as well as options to prevent and treat these transfusion complications. We discuss the evidence supporting these options and point out the outstanding gaps. Finally, we review the possible future directions for prevention and treatment of alloimmune refractoriness.

Slot blotting and flow cytometry: two efficient assays for platelet antibody screening among patients with platelet refractoriness.

Frequent platelet transfusion may lead to the formation of alloantibodies and immune-mediated platelet destruction. Currently, identifying economic and effective screening methods is necessary for the management of platelet transfusion while different tests were recommended. The present study aims to challenge the performance of slot blotting (SB) and flow cytometry (FC) assays in detecting immune platelet refractoriness. Sera from 118 patients who received blood components and were clinically suspected of platelet refractoriness were enrolled. Platelet-reactive antibodies were explored in parallel by SB, FC and monoclonal antibody-specific immobilization of platelet antigens (MAIPA) techniques. In a further study, chloroquine-treated platelets were incubated with MAIPA-positive serum, and then, the results of the SB and FC techniques were compared. Using MAIPA as a reference, antibodies were detected in 51 sera, with specificity for human leucocyte antigens (HLA), human platelet antigens (HPA) or both HLA/HPA, in 27, 18 and 6 patients, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of SB and FC were 86·3%, 88·1%, 82·4% and 95·5%, respectively. The Spearman correlation revealed significant (P<0·001) correlations between FC (r=0·763) and SB (r=0·738) with MAIPA. In respect to HPA antibody detection, SB had 83·3% sensitivity and 92·6% specificity compared to 91·7% and 96·3% for FC while both approaches are acceptable (P<0·001, r=0·69; P<0·001, r=0·773) and can be recommended. The present study acknowledges that among the used methods, the flow cytometry's performance is the most appropriate, but slot blotting, with acceptable sensitivity, can be used as an acceptable and convenient procedure for platelet antibody screening.

Frequency of Platelet Crossmatch Positivity and Predictive Value for Poor Platelet Increment Among Paediatric Oncohaematology Patients in India.

Immune platelet destruction is a significant cause for platelet refractoriness. The platelet crossmatch-a solid phase red cell adherence assay utilizes donor platelets and patient serum to assess compatibility and appears to be a feasible option in resource constrained settings. This study was done to evaluate the frequency of platelet crossmatch positivity among Paediatric Oncohaematology patients and also to assess whether a positive crossmatch is predictive of unsuccessful platelet transfusions in this group of patients. Paediatric Oncohaematology patients who received platelet transfusions between March 2013 and September 2013 were included in the study. The pre-transfusion patient sample and a segment from the transfused donor unit were used for performing the platelet crossmatch. A blood sample was collected one hour after the transfusion to assess post-transfusion platelet count. Corrected count increment (CCI) was calculated using the standard formula. CCI ≤ 7500/µL/m2/1011 was considered evidence of an unsuccessful transfusion. Seventy-three platelet crossmatches were performed for 69 patients, of which 30 patient samples (41%) showed crossmatch positivity. 25 (89.2%) of 28 unsuccessful transfusions showed crossmatch positivity, and 40 (88.9%) of 45 successful transfusions showed negative crossmatches (p = 0.03). Crossmatch positivity among transfusion dependent Paediatric Oncohaematology patients was as high as 42%, when ABO matched platelet units were allocated without further testing. Our results indicate that this test may be a reliable tool to select compatible platelet units and an effective intervention in the management of patients at risk of immune platelet refractoriness.

High Incidence of Alloimmunization to Platelets and Platelet Transfusion Refractoriness during Induction Therapy in Patients Diagnosed with Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Introduction: Patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) are treated with intensive chemotherapeutic protocols. They are known to suffer from protracted pancytopenia and need prolonged transfusion support. Despite the administration of leukocyte-reduced and irradiated blood products, long-term transfusion dependency predisposes these patients to alloimmunization to both leukocyte (HLA) and platelet (HPA) antigens, leading to immune platelet transfusion refractoriness, which is a major risk factor for bleeding-associated morbidity and mortality, to longer hospitalizations and higher inpatient hospital costs. The published incidence of immune platelet refractoriness in patients with hematologic malignancies ranges between 7% and 34%. The Rambam Health Care Campus is the only tertiary care medical center in Northern Israel providing services to over 2 million citizens. This population is highly heterogeneousin terms of ethnic and religious background and has a relatively high birth rate (3.2 versus 1.75 in other developed countries). The majority of AML patients in the region are treated at the Rambam Department of Hematology. To the best of our knowledge, the incidence of alloimmunization to platelet antigens and immune platelet refractoriness in this population has never been studied. The aims of the current study were: to estimate the incidence of immune platelet transfusion refractoriness among AML patients in Northern Israel, to define the onset of alloimmunization during the treatment course and to evaluate the efficacy of antibody screening by platelet immunofluorescent test (PIFT) as a follow-up tool to predict the risk for alloimmunization and immune platelet transfusion refractoriness in these patients.Methods: Newly diagnosed AML patients were screened every two weeks for two months since diagnosis and throughout induction therapy for the presence of anti-HPA and anti-HLA antibodies using flow cytometry (PIFT assay). Antibodies were identified by the monoclonal-specific immobilization of platelet antigens (MAIPA) assay. Clinical parameters of patients were consecutively registered. Patients received platelet transfusions according to the institutional transfusion policy, including continuous platelet increment monitoring. Blood counts and platelet transfusion requirements were followed weekly; platelet refractoriness was determined when no increment (defined as an increase <5x109 platelets/L after a single transfusion of 3x1011 platelets) was documented following two consecutive platelet transfusions.Results: One hundred newly diagnosed AML patients (56 males and 44 females; age range 25-60 years) of various ethnic origins were included in the analysis. Platelet refractoriness was revealed in 49 (49%) patients (20 males and 29 females). Forty four (44%) patients developed anti-HLA and/or anti-HPA antibodies, 32/44 (73%) were females, 27 of them with more than two children. Immune platelet refractoriness was revealed in 34/49 (69%) refractory patients (8 males and 26 females); 13/34 (38%) had anti-HPA with (11) or without (2) anti-HLA antibodies and 21/34 (62%) had only anti-HLA antibodies. The average period from the beginning of treatment to antibody appearance was 26 days. The PIFT was found to be a sensitive, specific and efficient method for screening and detection of all anti-platelet antibodies, while MAIPA was found to be the preferred method for anti-platelet antibody identification.Conclusions: Women with more than two children were found to have a significantly higher risk to develop alloantibodies and transfusion refractoriness. Our findings demonstrating a higher incidence of immune platelet refractoriness compared to that reported in the literature may be attributed to the increased prevalence of multiparous women inhabiting our region. Routine antibody screening by PIFT appears to be an efficient tool for early detection of alloimmunized patients. DisclosuresNo relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Stratégies d’exploration de l’allo-immunisation plaquettaire pour la prévention et la prise en charge des inefficacités transfusionnelles plaquettaires

Platelet refractoriness is a serious complication for patients receiving recurrent platelet transfusions, which can be explained by non-immune and immune causes. Human Leukocyte Antigens (HLA) allo-immunization, especially against HLA class I, is the major cause for immune platelet refractoriness. To a lesser extent, allo-antibodies against specific Human Platelet Antigen (HPA) are also involved. Pregnancy, transplantation and previous transfusions can lead to allo-immune reaction against platelet antigens. After transfusion, platelet count is decreased by accelerated platelet destruction related to antibodies fixation on incompatible platelet antigens. New laboratory tests for allo-antibodies identification were developed to improve sensibility and specificity, especially with the LUMINEX® technology. The good use and interpretation of these antibodies assays can improve strategies for platelet refractoriness prevention and management with a patient adapted response. Compatible platelets units can be selected according to their identity with recipient typing or immune compatibility regarding HLA or HPA antibodies or HLA epitope compatibility. Prospective studies are needed to further confirm the clinical benefit of new allo-antibodies identification methods and consensus strategies for immune platelet refractoriness management.

Platelet antibody detection by flow cytometry: an effective method to evaluate and give transfusional support in platelet refractoriness

BackgroundImmune platelet refractoriness is mainly caused by human leukocyte antigen antibodies (80-90% of cases) and, to a lesser extent, by human platelet antigen antibodies. Refractoriness can be diagnosed by laboratory tests and patients should receive compatible platelet transfusions. A fast, effective and low cost antibody-screening method which detects platelet human leukocyte/platelet antigen antibodies is essential in the management of immune platelet refractoriness. ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to evaluate the efficiency of the flow cytometry platelet immunofluorescence test to screen for immune platelet refractoriness. MethodsA group of prospective hematologic patients with clinically suspected platelet refractoriness treated in a referral center in Campinas, SP during July 2006 and July 2011 was enrolled in this study. Platelet antibodies were screened using the flow cytometry platelet immunofluorescence test. Anti-human leukocyte antigen antibodies were detected by commercially available methods. The sensitivity, specificity and predictive values of the immunofluorescence test were determined taking into account that the majority of antiplatelet antibodies presented human leukocyte antigen specificity. ResultsSeventy-six samples from 32 female and 38 male patients with a median age of 43.5 years (range: 5-84 years) were analyzed. The sensitivity of the test was 86.11% and specificity 75.00% with a positive predictive value of 75.61% and a negative predictive value of 85.71%. The accuracy of the method was 80.26%. ConclusionThis study shows that the flow cytometry platelet immunofluorescence test has a high correlation with the anti-human leukocyte antigen antibodies. Despite a few limitations, the method seems to be efficient, fast and feasible as the initial screening for platelet antibody detection and a useful tool to crossmatch platelets for the transfusional support of patients with immune platelet refractoriness.

HLA alloimmunization against platelet transfusions: pathophysiology, significance, prevention and management

Approximately five decades ago, alloimmunization to human leukocyte antigens (HLA) and platelet refractoriness were recognized as potentially serious complications of platelet transfusions. The mechanisms that result in stimulating immunity against blood products are still incompletely understood but are related to both the composition of the donor product transfused and the immune status of the recipient. Based on murine studies of platelet immunity, platelets are inherently immunogenic and there are at least two independent levels of immunoregulation against platelet transfusions. The first level resides within the recipient and is related to antigen processing/presentation events and CD8+ T cell-mediated immunosuppression. The second level relates to the donor product and includes donor antigen presenting cells (APC) levels as well as age-induced changes in donor APC and/or platelets. Implementation of pre-storage leukoreduction of cellular blood components led to a marked reduction in platelet alloimmunization and its dreaded complication, platelet refractoriness. Platelet refractoriness is usually managed by transfusion of matched platelets, selected according to one of the many published methods. It is unclear which of these methods is superior, and given the difficulty of obtaining a perfectly matched product, perhaps the most logical approach is to use a combination of selection strategies. This review discusses the various aspects of platelet alloimmunization and the clinical consequences that may result. It highlights how animal studies have shed light on the immune mechanisms responsible for allogeneic platelet immunity and immunomodulation and reviews relevant literature on clinical and laboratory manifestations of immune platelet refractoriness.

Comments on: frequency of human platelet antigens in oncohematological patients with thrombocytopenia and the probability of incompatibility to platelet transfusions

Comments on: frequency of human platelet antigens in oncohematological patients with thrombocytopenia and the probability of incompatibility to platelet transfusions

A rapid and specific whole blood HPA-1 phenotyping by flow cytometry using two commercialized monoclonal antibodies directed against GP IIIa and GP IIb-IIIa complexes.

The human platelet antigen 1 (HPA-1) system has been implicated in rare but severe diseases, such as neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenic purpura, post-transfusion purpura and immune platelet refractoriness. We developed a flow cytometry assay for HPA-1 phenotyping using two commercial monoclonal antibodies, P2 and SZ21, directed against glycoprotein (GP) IIb-IIIa and GP IIIa respectively. One hundred and twenty-seven healthy controls were studied and ratios of mean fluorescence intensity for P2 and SZ21 discriminated between HPA-1a homozygotes and heterozygotes. These two monoclonal antibodies, coupled with flow cytometry represent a rapid and reliable tool for platelet HPA-1 typing to aid diagnosis.