Administration Of Immune Globulin Research Articles

Rh D Immune Globulin Administration After Abortion or Pregnancy Loss at Less Than 12 Weeks of Gestation.

This Clinical Practice Update provides revised guidance on Rh testing and Rh D immune globulin administration for individuals undergoing abortion or experiencing pregnancy loss at less than 12 0/7 weeks of gestation. This document updates Practice Bulletin No. 225, Medication Abortion Up to 70 Days of Gestation (Obstet Gynecol 2020;136:e31-47); Practice Bulletin No. 200, Early Pregnancy Loss (Obstet Gynecol 2018;132:e197-207); and Practice Bulletin No. 181, Prevention of Rh D Alloimmunization (Obstet Gynecol 2017;130:e57-70).

RhD-Alloimmunization in Adult and Pediatric Trauma Patients

The actual risk of providing RhD-positive units to RhD-negative recipients remains debatable. There is no standard of care in the United States (US) to guide transfusion decisions regarding RhD type for patients with an unknown blood type, except for women of childbearing age and neonates. The risk of alloantibody formation by an RhD-negative patient exposed to RhD-positive blood is reported to be from 3% to 70%. Due to such wide variations, this review was undertaken to determine the prevalence of anti-D alloimmunization in trauma patients who are RhD-negative and were transfused RhD-positive blood products. This study used the “Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses” (PRISMA) approach to answer the question, “In trauma patients who were transfused blood, what is the prevalence of alloimmunization to the D-antigen?” The review included all published articles through April 3, 2022 in databases. Articles published after the search period found by the authors were added to the manuscript if they addressed the primary question and there was unanimous consensus. There were 1683 full-text articles that met the search criteria, with 19 studies meeting eligibility criteria. In addition, 57 references were added after the search period had closed. The incidence of anti-D alloimmunization in adult trauma patients receiving whole blood varied from 7.8% to 42.7%. In contrast, incidence varied in patients receiving red blood cells (RBCs), from 0 to 94%, depending on number of categories analyzed. Anti-D alloimmunization with platelet transfusions varied from 0% to 19%. The alloimmunization rate increased with age and was detected only in children older than 5 years. Recent guidelines recommend the administration of Rh immune globulin (RhIG) to all traumatically injured patients who are both RhD-negative and pregnant. However, there is no specific guidance focused on the RhD-negative patient, pregnant or nonpregnant, and who have received RhD-positive red blood cells (RBC) and platelets. While numerous studies have attempted to evaluate the frequency of RhD alloimmunization rate in trauma settings, emerging data suggests that many factors affect this phenomenon. Additionally, the role of RhIG administration in cases of RhD-incompatible transfusions within the trauma setting adds complexity. As our trajectory propels us towards precision medicine and tailored transfusion practices, gaining a big data approach becomes indispensable.

A tale of two societies: implications of conflicting Rh-immunoglobulin guidelines

National guidance conflicts regarding the use of RhD immune globulin administration <12w. Recent Society for Maternal Fetal Medicine (SMFM) guidelines suggest liberal use of this product while other guidelines, including Society of Family Planning and the World Health Organization, propose a more conservative approach. Medicine is not practiced in a vacuum, and potential harms must include not only individual but communal and public health effects. We aim to critically examine the practical implications of the new SMFM guidelines with a focus on equity and access.

Safety and tolerability of pooled human immune globulins after topical ophthalmic administration in New Zealand White rabbits

Purpose To evaluate the safety and tolerability of pooled human immune globulins, Flebogamma® 5% DIF and Flebogamma® 10% DIF, administered by topical ophthalmic instillation to New Zealand White (NZW) rabbits. Methods Male NZW rabbits were used in this study. In the acute single dose tolerability study, rabbits (n = 12) received a single topical dose of Flebogamma® 5% DIF. In the two-week repeated-dose tolerability study, rabbits (n = 5 for each group) were administered either Flebogamma® 5% DIF or Flebogamma® 10% DIF by topical bilateral administration four times daily (q.i.d.) between 8 am and 6 pm for a period of two weeks. Full ophthalmic examinations were conducted to evaluate ocular tolerability at baseline, Day 7, and Day 14. Results In the acute single dose study, mild hyperaemia was observed in 1 out of 4 eyes at each 4 h and 24 h post-instillation of Flebogamma® 5% DIF. In the repeated dose study, no ocular signs were detected after q.i.d. topical instillation of Flebogamma® 5% DIF, while Flebogamma® 10% DIF resulted in mild hyperaemia in 8 out of 10 eyes on Day 7, and 5 out of 10 eyes on Day 14. No positive corneal fluorescein staining was detected. Schirmer tear test results were unremarkable. No other ocular signs were observed. Administration of immune globulins had no effect on intraocular pressure. Conclusions Flebogamma® 5% DIF and Flebogamma® 10% DIF were well-tolerated by NZW rabbits following single and repeat dose topical ophthalmic administration, supporting the future development of topical pooled human immune globulins for the treatment of ocular surface disease.

When and why is red blood cell genotyping applicable in transfusion medicine: a systematic review of the literature.

This review aims to provide a better understanding of when and why red blood cell (RBC) genotyping is applicable in transfusion medicine. Articles published within the last 8 years in peer-reviewed journals were reviewed in a systematic manner. RBC genotyping has many applications in transfusion medicine including predicting a patient's antigen profile when serologic methods cannot be used, such as in a recently transfused patient, in the presence of autoantibody, or when serologic reagents are not available. RBC genotyping is used in prenatal care to determine zygosity and guide the administration of Rh immune globulin in pregnant women to prevent hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn. In donor testing, RBC genotyping is used for resolving ABO/D discrepancies for better donor retention or for identifying donors negative for high-prevalence antigens to increase blood availability and compatibility for patients requiring rare blood. RBC genotyping is helpful to immunohematology reference laboratory staff performing complex antibody workups and is recommended for determining the antigen profiles of patients and prospective donors for accurate matching for C, E, and K in multiply transfused patients. Such testing is also used to determine patients or donors with variant alleles in the Rh blood group system. Information from this testing aides in complex antibody identification as well as sourcing rare allele-matched RBC units. While RBC genotyping is useful in transfusion medicine, there are limitations to its implementation in transfusion services, including test availability, turn-around time, and cost.

Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine Statement: RhD immune globulin after spontaneous or induced abortion at less than 12 weeks of gestation

Guidelines for management of first-trimester spontaneous and induced abortion vary regarding RhD testing and Rho(D) immune globulin administration. These existing guidelines are based on limited data that do not convincingly demonstrate the safety of withholding Rho(D) immune globulin for first-trimester abortions or pregnancy losses. Given the adverse fetal and neonatal outcomes associated with RhD alloimmunization, prevention of maternal sensitization is essential in RhD negative patients who may experience subsequent pregnancies. In care settings where RhD testing and Rho(D) immune globulin administration are logistically and financially feasible and do not hinder access to abortion care, we recommend both RhD testing and RhIg administration for spontaneous and induced abortion at <12 weeks of gestation in unsensitized, RhD-negative individuals.

Real-world evidence of rabies post-exposure prophylaxis in Serbia: Nation-wide observational study (2017–2019)

BackgroundRabies remains a deadly zoonotic disease, primarily prevalent in Eastern European countries, with a significant global burden in Asia and Africa. Post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) is critical to prevent clinical rabies. Serbia, a country with a relatively low animal rabies incidence, has been implementing a 4-dose Essen PEP regimen for 13 years. This real-world study aimed to assess the effectiveness of the 4-dose Essen regimen, considering demographic and clinical factors, after WHO Category III exposure. MethodThe study included 601 patients who received the 4-dose Essen PEP and 79 who received an additional 5th dose. ResultsAge emerged as a critical factor influencing seroconversion rates after the 4-dose regimen, with older individuals exhibiting lower RVNA titers. Logistic regression indicated a 3.18% decrease in seroconversion odds for each added year of age. The Cox proportional hazards mixed model highlighted age-related risks, with age groups 45–60 and 75–92 at the highest risk of non-seroconversion. Human Rabies Immune Globulin (HRIG) administration was associated with lower RVNA values after the 4-dose regimen, suggesting interference with vaccine immunogenicity among people who received larger doses of HRIG. ConclusionsThis study provides valuable real-world evidence for rabies PEP in a non-homogeneous population with potential comorbidities. The results underscore the importance of optimizing PEP strategies, particularly in older individuals, and reconsidering HRIG dosing to improve seroconversion rates.

Risk Reduction Strategies for Rabies Exposures and Prophylaxis in Children

Annually, 59,000 people die of rabies, the world’s oldest known infectious disease, globally. In the United States, canine rabies has been virtually eliminated but the risk of rabies due to wildlife, especially raccoons, skunks, and bats, has required post exposure prophylaxis (PEP) be administered to more than 60,000 patients annually1. In 2021, 5 people in the United States2 died of rabies mostly due to misinformation or improper treatment. Rabies post exposure prophylaxis consists of three steps, wound washing, administration of human rabies immune globulin (HRIG) and a full course of vaccine3. In 2022, Whitehouse4 published that there were 122 breakthrough rabies infections when PEP was given due to four factors: 1) deviations from core practice 2) delays in seeking health care 3) errors in administration of HRIG 4) comorbidities or immunosuppression. It is estimated that over 40% of PEP administration is given inappropriately. The publication,” Safety, and efficacy of rabies immunoglobulin in pediatric patients with suspected exposure”, Human Vaccines &amp; Immunotherapeutics, 17:7, 2090–20965, was the first study that prospectively reviewed the use of human rabies immune globulin 150 IU/ml in 30 pediatric patients ages 0.5–14.9 years old. Globally, 40% of people bitten by animals suspected of being infected with the rabies virus are children under the age of 15.6 This paper will look at risk reduction strategies that will include: Proper Identification of major rabies vectors Special risks associated with bat exposures in children Administration of human rabies immune globulin with volume considerations in children Special administration consideration for rabies vaccines “Just -in- time “Education for health care providers Illustrative cases will be used to demonstrate each of these strategies of risk as well as the strategies for risk reduction.

Rh(D) immune globulin administration in pregnancy: Retrospective audit of patient safety events followed by targeted educational intervention with Bayesian analysis.

To examine local patient safety events related to the administration of anti-Rh(D) immune globin (RhIG) during pregnancy, and to follow-up with targeted educational intervention to improve knowledge of this process. Administration RhIG is established treatment for the prevention of haemolytic disease of the foetus and newborn (HDFN). However, patient safety events in relation to its correct use continue to occur. A retrospective audit of patient safety events related to RhIG administration during pregnancy was performed. Targeted educational intervention in the form of PowerPoint® presentation were given to nursing staff, laboratory staff and physicians and evaluated with pre- and post-tests using multiple-choice questions given immediately before and after the presentation. An annual incidence of 0.24% of patient safety events related to the administration of RhIG during pregnancy was found. These events were mostly in the preanalytical phase, for example mislabelled samples or samples for D-rosette/Kleihauer-Betke testing drawn from the baby, not the mother. Using Bayesian analysis, the probability of positive effect for the targeted educational intervention was 100% with a median improved score of 29%. This was compared with a control group using standard curriculum education intervention based on the current curriculum for nursing, laboratory and medical students which showed a median improved score of only 4.4%. Administration of RhIG during pregnancy is a multistep process involving health care professionals of several disciplines providing opportunities to enhance the curriculum for nursing, laboratory and medical students and to ensure on-going education.

Implementation of Clinical Decision Support on Emergency Department Delivery of Human Rabies Immune Globulin

Fatal human rabies infections can be prevented through appropriate rabies postexposure prophylaxis (PEP). Errors in patient selection and administration of human rabies immune globulin in the emergency department (ED) setting were identified in a previous study of rabies PEP administration. To test the a priori hypothesis that implementation of a rabies PEP bundle in the ED would improve full adherence to 6 human rabies immune globulin quality indicators compared with preimplementation controls. This quality improvement study was conducted in 15 EDs in a US multihospital health system. Patients who received human rabies immune globulin or rabies vaccine in the ED from January 2015 to June 2018 were included in the preimplementation control group and from December 2019 to November 2020 were included in the postimplementation intervention group. Data were analyzed in January 2021. The PEP bundle was implemented in December 2019 and consisted of electronic health record enhancements, including clinical decision support, ED staff education, and patient education. Full adherence to 6 human rabies immune globulin quality indicators: patient selection, dose, timing, infiltration into wounds, administration distant from rabies vaccine site, and administration that avoids the buttock. The study included 324 patients; 254 patients were in preimplementation group (mean [SD] age, 39 [21] years; 135 [53%] women) and 70 in the postimplementation group (mean [SD] age, 38 [19] years; 33 [47%] women). Most patients presented to EDs embedded in a community hospital (231 patients [71%]). Full adherence increased from 37% in the preimplementation group to 61% postimplementation (absolute increase, 24%; 95% CI, 11% to 37%; P < .001). Adherence improved for quality indicators for infiltration into wounds (137 of 254 patients [54%] to 50 of 70 patients [71%]; P = .009), administration distant from rabies vaccine site (180 of 254 [71%] to 58 of 70 [83%]; P = .04), and administration that avoids the buttock (168 of 254 [66%] to 58 of 70 [83%]; P = .007). No instances of sciatic nerve injury or compartment syndrome were observed. In this quality improvement study, implementation of a rabies PEP bundle was associated with improved patient selection and delivery of human rabies immune globulin in EDs across a multihospital health system. Although the bundle included ED staff education and patient discharge education, the observed improvement was likely driven by clinical decision support from the rabies PEP ED order set. Future research should evaluate implementation of this clinical decision support at other health systems.

Assessment of rabies immune globulin dose rounding at a university health system

PurposeDescribe a dose rounding strategy for rabies immune globulin (RIG) administration. MethodsMulticenter, retrospective, observational review of patients that received RIG following an exposure from an animal with potential to transmit rabies infection in one health-system from March 2011 through December 2021. The primary outcome was to describe the RIG dose rounding strategy and population of patients that received RIG rounded to the nearest vial size compared to those that did not. Secondary outcomes evaluated additional costs and RIG international units (IU) wasted that could have occurred (rounded group) or did occur (not rounded group), re-presentation to the ED or primary care provider (PCP) within 7 days due to RIG related complaint, and occurrence of rabies infection. Data collection included patient demographics, exposure information, and RIG dose administered. Descriptive data and univariate analyses are reported. Cost and RIG IU wasted were calculated for the dosing strategies. Results426 patients were included; 373 (88%) had RIG rounded to the nearest vial size and 53 (12%) did not (mean age 36.1 years ±20.5, 51.6% male, most common exposures were bats [50%], type was bite [58%], and category III exposures [92%]). Those that had RIG rounded were younger and had lower total RIG doses, but similar IU/kg doses to those not rounded. A cost savings of $144,815 and prevention of 40,572 RIG IU wasted was calculated from those patients that had RIG rounded. There was no difference in the rate of re-presentation within 7 days and no cases of human rabies infection in the region during the study period. ConclusionsRIG dose rounding to the nearest vial size is associated with cost savings and prevention of wasting RIG IU. There was no association with re-presentation to the ED or PCP with RIG related issues within 7 days from administration.

Immune globulin therapy and kidney disease: Overview and screening, monitoring, and management recommendations.

PurposeThis report calls attention to the potential risks of diminished kidney function when administering immune globulin (IG). The goal is to increase awareness of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and kidney function impairment in patients receiving IG and provide recommendations for screening, monitoring, and management to promote risk prevention and mitigation.SummaryHuman IG preparations for intravenous (IVIG) or subcutaneous (SCIG) administration are the mainstay of treatment in patients with primary immunodeficiency diseases. Increasingly, IVIG at high doses (1,000 to 2,400 mg/kg) is also used as a treatment for a variety of autoimmune and inflammatory conditions. Although some autoinflammatory disorders respond to a single course of IVIG therapy, the majority of patients require long-term, regular infusions, thereby increasing the overall risks. Often, both patients and physicians treating adults with IG are unaware of underlying CKD or kidney function impairment. This lack of awareness constitutes a major risk factor for potential worsening, particularly when using high doses of IVIG. Therefore, screening of all patients for CKD and kidney function impairment before the use of IG is essential. Identification of the cause of kidney impairment is strongly encouraged, as IG therapy may need to be modified.ConclusionAs detailed here, there are potential risks to patients with impaired kidney function with administration of IG, particularly at high doses. Product selection, volume, route of administration, and rate of infusion may impact those with compromised kidney function. Therefore, screening of all patients for CKD and kidney function impairment before the use of IVIG and SCIG, as well as ongoing monitoring and management, is critical. As with all potential adverse drug reactions, the best approach is to prevent them.

Missed anti-D immune globulin administration to postpartum patients in 2 health systems: an unrecognized patient safety risk

BACKGROUNDMaternal-fetal Rh-alloimmunization is a rare but potentially fatal event, most often caused by maternal exposure to D-antigen-presenting Rh-positive erythrocytes at the time of delivery. Prophylaxis with anti-D immune globulin is highly effective with a low side-effect profile and results in a dramatically decreased risk of alloimmunization. Postpartum anti-D immune globulin prophylaxis is recommended by national societies to reduce Rh-alloimmunization. We hypothesized that a small number of postpartum patients do not receive prophylaxis as indicated. OBJECTIVEWe investigated patients in 2 separate health systems that did not receive indicated prophylaxis and devised a suite of Electronic Health Record interventions to prevent future errors.STUDY DESIGNWe reviewed charts retrospectively from Electronic Health Record data of 2 urban academic health systems, the MetroHealth System and Oregon Health & Science University. We identified all Rh-negative postpartum patients and their infants delivering from 2014 to 2019. The primary outcome was the proportion of postpartum patients not receiving indicated anti-D immune globulin prophylaxis. Once cases of missed anti-D immune globulin prophylaxis were identified, we reviewed individual charts to determine the relevant clinical circumstances and potential causes for error.RESULTSOf 29,801 deliveries over 5 years (15,444 at MetroHealth System and 14,357 at Oregon Health & Science University), there were 3087 Rh-negative postpartum patients, of whom 7 were alloimmunized and ineligible for prophylaxis. Anti-D immune globulin was indicated for 2162 (70.0%) women as they delivered an Rh-positive infant. A total of 37 indicated patients did not receive postpartum anti-D immune globulin. Twenty patients were offered prophylaxis and declined. We missed a total of 17 opportunities, thus our institutions appropriately offered indicated anti-D prophylaxis to 99.2% of patients over a period of 5 years. Of the 17 true misses, anti-D immune globulin was ordered for some patients, whereas others did not have an anti-D immune globulin order placed. A toolkit in the Electronic Health Record consisting of decision-support hard stops, automated documentation, and longitudinal reporting was implemented at the MetroHealth System in the year after its inception. The Toolkit identified and helped prevent 4 potential misses, resulting in a 100% anti-D prophylaxis rate at the MetroHealth System.CONCLUSIONGiven the serious nature of Rh-alloimmunization, we believe missed prophylaxis should be a never event. Through examination of our current processes, we identified areas of improvement and developed a Postpartum Anti-D Immune Globulin Prophylaxis Electronic Health Record Toolkit, which showed improvement in administration rates. Such a toolkit has the potential to identify patients appropriately and avoid missed anti-D immune globulin prophylaxis events.

Guillain-Barré Syndrome During the COVID-19 Pandemic and Pre-pandemic Periods

Background: Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS) is an autoimmune disease that may occur after infections. As Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) may bring about GBS, it is important to assess the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on this disease Objectives: This study aimed to compare the distribution and characteristics of GBS during and before the COVID-19 pandemic in an academic referral hospital in the north of Iran. Materials &amp; Methods: This retrospective study assessed GBS distribution and characteristics during the COVID-19 pandemic period (from March 2020 to the end of February 2021) and before the pandemic (from March 2019 to the end of February 2020) on 5340 patients referred to the Neurology Ward of Poursina Hospital of Guilan Province, in Iran. Results: There was no significant difference between GBS distribution during (0.03%) and before (0.04%) the COVID-19 pandemic (P=0.413). There were also no differences between the two periods regarding the gender (P=0.659) and age (P=0.417) of the patients. The most common subtype of GBS during the COVID-19 pandemic was Acute Motor and Sensory Axonal Neuropathy (AMSAN) (71.4%). In both periods, the most common type of treatment was intravenous administration of immune globulin. There was no significant difference between the two periods (P=0.838) regarding the patients’ treatment response. Conclusion: The distribution of GBS, its subtypes, type of treatment, and response to treatment were not different between the two study periods.

Live Immunization Practices for Chronically Transfused Pediatric Patients

Introduction: Children with hemoglobinopathies often require chronic transfusion as a part of their care. The Canadian Immunization Guide, the National Advisory Committee on Immunizations, and the Centre for Disease Control recommend avoidance of live vaccination for a period following blood product transfusion. The literature indicates that human derived blood products contain significant amounts of antibodies to infectious agents that are prevalent in the general population, due to natural disease or vaccination of the donor, such as the measles virus and varicella zoster virus. The recommended time interval between packed red blood cell (PRBC) transfusion and live vaccination was extrapolated from a study which assessed vaccine responses after administration of Intravenous immune globulin. If practitioners adhere to guidelines, many chronically transfused pediatric patients would not be eligible to receive live vaccinations due to concerns of non-response to the vaccine. Thecomposition of blood products has changed over time and current immunization recommendations may not reflect the blood products being utilized today. Specifically, the amount of residual plasma in PRBCs has been reduced substantially, reducing passive antibody concentration and likely reducing interference in the immune response. To our knowledge, the immune response to live vaccines has not been formally studied in pediatric patients who undergo chronic transfusion with PRBCs. We aimed to determine the current live immunization practices of health care providers (HCPs) caring for chronically transfused pediatric patients.Hypothesis: Is there heterogeneity in the live immunization practices of North American Pediatric HCPs who care for chronically transfused children?Methods: The study was approved by the University of Alberta Research Ethics Board. A cross-sectional online survey was circulated to North American hematology HCPs. The survey was peer-reviewed by 7 practitioners prior to distribution for content and face validity with 3 versions before final approval and distribution. The survey was distributed via the Canadian Hemoglobinopathy Association (CanHaem,186 members) and the American Society of Pediatric Hematology/ Oncology (ASPHO, 1991 members) listservs. Responses were collated from June 2017-July 2017 in a REDcap database. Data was analyzed using descriptive statistics.Results: There were 60 respondents total. 60% of HCPs were from the U.S.A., and 70% cared for 1-19 patients meeting study criteria. The majority had 1-10 patients who travelled to measles endemic countries annually, and 33% of HCPs reported there had been a local outbreak of Measles, Mumps, Rubella or Varicella (MMRV) within the past year. Despite this, 50% were unaware of the MMRV immune-status of their patients. Eighty-seven percent of HCPs continued to administer live vaccinations as per the routine immunization schedule. Less than 10% had a protocol for the care of chronically transfused patients, and <25% complete pre-and-post vaccination serologies to assess immune-status in the transfused population. Respondents reported various follow-up strategies, including education of patients (40%), documentation of potential susceptibility to MMRV (15%), and education of the HCP's administering live vaccines (20%). Only 24/55 (44%) of respondents were aware of the recommendation to avoid live vaccinations in transfused patients, and 44% of respondents did not have a follow-up strategy for chronically transfused patients regarding immune-status.Conclusion: Live immunization practices for chronically transfused pediatric patients vary across North America. Many HCPs are unaware of the recommendations around avoidance of live immunizations post transfusion. Most respondents immunize their chronically transfused pediatric patients as per the routine schedule, but the immune-status post-vaccination is often unknown. Given changes to the processing of blood products over the last several decades, further research is needed in this area. Determination of pre-and-post-immunization serologies may help to establish the response of chronically transfused patients to live vaccinations, and allow for the development of evidence-based guidelines for live-immunization of this vulnerable patient population. DisclosuresBruce:Bristol-Meyers-Squibb - consultant 2016-2017: Consultancy; ovartis consult and ad board 2015-2016: Consultancy; Apopharma 2015: Consultancy.

Benefits and Risks of Antiviral Treatment during Pregnancy in Patients with Chronic Hepatitis B.

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) is a main cause of chronic liver disease worldwide and can lead to severe liver diseases. The World Health Organization has planned to eliminate viral hepatitis, including hepatitis caused by HBV and hepatitis C virus, by 2030. As mother-to-child transmission (MTCT) of HBV is a main cause of chronic HBV infection, MTCT prevention is the main target to reduce the risk of chronic HBV infection and eliminate the disease. Recent clinical trials and meta-analyses found that antiviral therapy could prevent MTCT effectively in mothers with ≥200,000 IU/mL of HBV DNA, in combination with serial vaccination and hepatitis B immune globulin administration in infants. Despite the preventive role of antivirals for MTCT of HBV, there are several concerns regarding antiviral therapy with respect to the safety of the mother and fetus during pregnancy. This review summarizes the benefits and risks of antiviral treatment during pregnancy in women with chronic HBV infection.

A review regarding virology, etiology, prevalence and associated risk factors of Hepatitis A.

Hepatitis A is an infectious disorder of the liver prompted by Hepatovirus A virus (HAV). It is a kind of viral hepatitis. It has naked nucleocapsid virus with a single stranded, positive polarity RNA. It is devoid of virion polymerase and has a single serotype. Transmission is via fecal–oral route. In contrast to Hepatitis B virus and Hepatitis C virus, blood borne transmission of HAV is infrequent because viremia is short-term and of low titer. Mostly instances, have few or no signs, specifically in younger ones. The virus replicates in the gastrointestinal tract and then spreads to the liver during a short-term viremic period. HAV is not cytopathic for the hepatocyte. Hepatocellular injury is triggered by immune attack by the cytotoxic T cells. The time among the infection and signs, in patients that progress them, is among two and six weeks. When the signs occur, they commonly last 8 weeks and might encompass nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, jaundice, pain in abdomen and fever. Around 10 to 15 percent of patients undergo a recurrence of signs at some stage in the six months after the preliminary infection. Acute liver failure may also seldom occur, with this being extra regular in elderly. No antiviral medication is available. The most suitable test to diagnose acute infection is IgM antibody. Isolation of the virus from clinical samples is not done. Vaccine consists of killed virus. Administration of immune globulin in the course of the incubation can alleviate the disease.

Combined thrombogenic effects of vessel injury, pregnancy and procoagulant immune globulin administration in mice

BackgroundPregnant women are at increased risk of thrombotic adverse events. Plasma derived immune globulin (IG) products, which are used in pregnancy for various indications, may contain procoagulant impurity activated coagulation factor XI (FXIa). Procoagulant IG products have been associated with increased thrombogenicity but their effect in pregnancy is unknown.MethodsLate pregnant (gestation days 17–20) or early lactation (days 1–3) and control female mice were treated with IGs supplemented with human FXIa then subjected to ferric chloride (FeCl3) vessel injury. Occlusion of blood vessel was assessed by recording blood velocity in the femoral vein for 20 min using doppler ultrasound laser imaging. FXIa dose was selected by the ability to increase thrombin generation in mouse plasma in vitro.ResultsFXIa produced robust thrombin generation in mouse plasma ex vivo. Following FeCl3 injury, pregnant and non-pregnant mice receiving IG + FXIa exhibited faster reduction of blood velocity in femoral vein compared to IG alone or untreated controls. In vitro, thrombin generation in plasma samples collected after thrombosis in FXIa-treated animals was elevated and could be reduced by anti-FXI antibody.ConclusionsOur results suggest that intravenously-administered FXIa may contribute to thrombosis at the site of vascular injury in both pregnant and non-pregnant animals.

Measles Exposure Investigation in a Children’s Hospital Emergency Department— Denver Metropolitan Area, Colorado, 2019

Background: On December 14, 3 unvaccinated siblings with recent international travel presented to Children’s Hospital Colorado emergency department (CHCO-ED) with fever, rash, conjunctivitis, coryza, and cough. Measles was immediately suspected; respiratory masks were placed on the patients before they entered an airborne isolation room, and public health officials (PH) were promptly notified. Notably, on December 12, 1 ill sibling presented to CHCO-ED with fever only. We conducted an investigation to confirm measles, to determine susceptibility of potentially exposed ED contacts and healthcare workers (HCWs), and to implement infection prevention measures to prevent secondary cases. Methods: Measles was confirmed using polymerase chain reaction testing. Through medical record review and CHCO-ED unit-leader interviews, we identified patients and HCWs in overlapping ED areas with the first sibling, until 2 hours after discharge. Measles susceptibility was assessed through interviews with adults accompanying pediatric patients and HCW immunity record reviews. Potentially exposed persons were classified as immune (≥1 documented measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccination or serologic evidence of immunity), unconfirmed immune (self-reported MMR or childhood vaccination without documentation), or susceptible (no MMR vaccine history or age &lt;12 months). Susceptibility status directed disease control intervention, and contact follow-up was 21 days. Results: On December 14, all 3 siblings (ages 8–11 years) had laboratory-confirmed measles and were hospitalized. CHCO’s rapid isolation of the 3 cases within 5 minutes after presentation to the ED eliminated the need for exposure assessment on the day of hospitalization. However on December 12, the 1 ill sibling potentially exposed 258 ED contacts (90 patients, 168 accompanying adults) and 22 HCWs. The PH department identified 158 immune contacts (61%), 75 unconfirmed immune contacts (29%), and 19 susceptible contacts (8%); 6 contacts (2%) were lost to follow-up. Overall, 15 susceptible contacts received immune globulin (IG) postexposure prophylaxis and 4 contacts were placed on 21-day quarantine. Unconfirmed immune contacts self-monitored for measles symptoms and were contacted weekly by PH for 21 days. Moreover, 20 immune HCWs monitored symptoms daily; 2 susceptible HCWs were placed on 21-day quarantine. No secondary cases were identified. Conclusions: Rapid measles identification and isolation, high levels (90%) of immunity among contacts, prompt administration of IG, and effective collaboration between PH and CHCO prevented transmission.Funding: NoneDisclosures: None

Case Management for COVID-19 Pneumonia: Literature Review

Introduction: Coronavirus is a collection of viruses that can infect the respiratory system. In many cases, this virus only causes mild respiratory infections, such as flu. However, this virus can also cause severe respiratory infections, such as lung infections (pneumonia). The method is a literature review research in the form of case reports through the search of accredited journal sites such as Scientdirect and Elsevier with the keyword COVID-19 pneumonia in the period of 2015-2020. Research Results: in handling COVID-19 cases each country has its own way which consists of a physical examination, blood laboratory examination, chest CT scan, swab test, urine test, oxygen installation, mechanical ventilation, Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygention (ECMO) ), as well as the administration of drugs Ceftriaxone, Azithromycin, Piramivir, iopinavir-Ritonavir, Nafamostat and Intravenous Immune Globulin (IVIG), each patient differs based on history of illness. Conclusion: every region and every country has its own way of handling COVID-19 cases because until now there has been no definitive treatment or vaccine that can treat cases of COVID-19 that have struck all over the world.