Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Regimens Research Articles

The predictive value of coronary artery calcium deposit for cardiovascular events in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy

Abstract Background Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are now a standard of care for the treatment of wide variety of cancers, due to their dramatically improved patient's outcomes. Nevertheless, their use may lead to significant cardiovascular immune-related adverse events (CV irAEs). Objectives We aimed to assess whether pre-treatment coronary artery calcium (CAC) deposit may play as a risk factor for CV irAEs development in patients treated with ICIs therapy. Methods A retrospective single center cohort of patients treated with ICIs therapy, who performed pre-treatment chest computed tomography. Visual CAC assessment was performed, categorized to positive or negative calcium deposit in the coronary arteries. Patients with pre-existing ischemic heart disease were excluded. The primary endpoint was to evaluate the association between positive CAC deposit and the composite CV irAEs, including myocarditis, acute coronary syndrome, heart failure, and arrhythmias. The secondary endpoint was to evaluate its association to all-cause mortality. Results The cohort included 238 patients, with mean age 65±13 years and 53% male representative. The most prevalent type of cancer was lung (36%) and the prominent ICIs regimen was pembrolizumab (54%). High incidence of cardiac risk factors was observed, including hypertension (39%), hyperlipidemia (35%) and diabetes (23%). Overall, 145 (61%) patients were included in the positive CAC deposit group. No significant differences were observed between the positive and negative groups regarding cancer type, ICIs therapy and baseline cardiac risk factors or medical therapy. Over a 12-months follow-up period, positive CAC deposit was not associated with the development of CV irAEs (p=0.139), or increased all-cause mortality (p=0.884). Conclusion The presence of pre-treatment positive CAC deposit did not demonstrate a predictive role in assessing the risk of CV irAEs or all-cause mortality in patients treated with ICIs.

Clinical benefit evaluation of drug treatment regimens for advanced lung cancer-based on ASCO-VF and ESMO-MCBS

BackgroundWith the increasing use of novel targeted drugs and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) for lung cancer (LC), the life expectancy of patients with LC has notably increased. In China, many drugs with the same mechanism of action have been approved by the National Medical Products Administration (NMPA) through phase III randomized controlled trials (RCTs). However, differences occur in these drugs’ efficacy and adverse effects, all of which have been compared with standard treatments, and data from head-to-head studies are lacking. MethodsThe key RCTs of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs), ALK-TKIs, and ICIs approved by NMPA in advanced LC in China were searched and divided into five groups. The American Society of Clinical Oncology Value Framework (ASCO-VF v2) and European Society for Medical Oncology Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale (ESMO-MCBS v1.1) were used to evaluate the net health benefits (NHB) of RCTs, including efficacy, adverse reactions, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs), etc. The consistency of the ASCO-VF and ESMO-MCBS was compared. ResultsAs of September 2024, 37 RCTs have been included in the ASCO-VF and ESMO-MCBS. NHB scores ranged from 12.30 to 93.25. Nineteen trials met the ASCO-VF “substantial benefit”, and 28 trials achieved the ESMO-MCBS “substantial benefit”. Except for icotinib, dacomitinib, and befotertinib, all EGFR-TKIs and ALK-TKIs met the threshold of two frameworks. In the ICI regimens, eight regimens met the threshold of “ substantial benefit ” as defined by the two frameworks and nine studies showed conflicting results. The correlation coefficient of the 37 pairs of scores in the advanced LC study was estimated to be 0.473(Spearman), and the consistency analysis showed fair agreement.(κ = 0.265, p = 0.001). ConclusionsASCO-VF and ESMO-MCBS focus on clinical efficacy and consider the adverse effects of drugs and PROs. We look forward to head-to-head studies on the different treatment options and advocate refining the ESMO-MCBS.

Real-world efficacy and safety of durvalumab-tremelimumab as second-line systemic therapy after atezolizumab-bevacizumab in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.

The efficacy and safety of immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) for the treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma are known. We explored ICI rechallenges with direct switching from 1 ICI regimen to another. This retrospective study included 16 patients who received atezolizumab-bevacizumab (Atezo+Bev) and durvalumab-tremelimumab (Dur+Tre) as the first-line and second-line combination therapy, respectively, at Hiroshima University Hospital. The radiological response and adverse event were evaluated in all patients. Of the 16 patients, 12 were male, and the median age at Atezo+Bev induction was 71 years. The reasons for medication changes were disease progression in 11 patients and adverse events in 5 patients. With Atezo+Bev and Dur+Tre initiation, the Barcelona-Clinic Liver-Cancer stage (A/B/C) progressed in 9/6/3 and 3/4/9 patients and the Child-Pugh classification (A/B/C) progressed in 12/4/0 and 9/6/3 patients, respectively. The disease control rate and overall response rate of Atezo+Bev were 87.5% and 58.3%, respectively, and of Dur+Tre were 62.5% and 0%, respectively. The most common immune-related adverse event in both the Atezo+Bev and Dur+Tre groups was colitis; 3 of the 5 patients with colitis on Atezo+Bev treatment had colitis with Dur+Tre, and 2 had exacerbations. Regarding liver function, ALBI score significantly decreased during Atezo+Bev, but not Dur+Tre, treatment. In patients with colitis following Atezo+Bev, subsequent Dur+Tre treatment may induce colitis recurrence or exacerbation. For immune-related adverse events other than colitis, Dur+Tre could provide relatively safe disease control while maintaining liver function.

Infusion-related reactions from immune checkpoint inhibitors: A proportional and network meta-analysis.

38 Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have become the standard of care for the treatment of patients with solid tumors. Infusion-related reactions (IRRs) to ICIs have been reported in up to 20%, but the incidence varies among ICIs. Therefore, we aimed to report and compare the incidence of IRRs to each ICI therapy. Methods: We searched PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science to identify phase 3 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating ICIs (CTLA-4, PD-1, PD-L1, and LAG-3 inhibitors) in solid tumors. We performed a random-effects model network meta-analysis to compare the odds ratio (OR) of IRRs by using RCTs comparing dual ICIs, ICI monotherapy, and placebo/observation. For a proportional meta-analysis, treatment arms evaluating ICI monotherapy, or dual ICIs, were selected to pool the incidence of IRRs. Results: A total of 25,250 patients from 47 phase 3 RCTs were included in the analysis. A network meta-analysis of treatment-related IRRs included 10 RCTs and showed that avelumab (OR 70.2, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 4.32-1140) and atezolizumab (40.72, 2.47-671.4) had a significantly higher risk of treatment-related IRRs compared with placebo/observation. Network ranking revealed that avelumab, atezolizumab, and relatlimab plus nivolumab were the top three therapies with risk of treatment-related IRRs. Proportional meta-analyses revealed that the pooled incidence of treatment-related IRRs was 5.39% for PD-1 plus CTLA-4 inhibitors, 8.25% for PD-L1 (avelumab: 13.1%, non-avelumab: 1.93%), 1.97% for CTLA-4, and 1.95% for PD-1 inhibitors. Results of immune-related IRRs were relatively consistent with those of treatment-related IRRs (Table). Conclusions: Avelumab has the highest risk of IRRs followed by atezolizumab and dual ICIs. This comparative study provides insight into the incidence of IRRs with ICI regimens. These results are useful in assessing which systemic therapies are responsible for IRRs, particularly when ICIs are combined with other agents. [Table: see text]

22 Association of a germline single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) in the interleukin-7 (IL7) gene with immune-related adverse events (irAEs)

Abstract Background Adverse events (AEs) can limit treatment immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) efficacy and worsen patient outcomes. Our group recently identified a germline IL7 SNP as a potential biomarker for prediction of irAEs (Groha, Nat Med 2022). In the current study, we sought to replicate the association between this IL7 SNP (rs16906115) and AEs in two clinical trials of patients with cancer treated with ICI regimens. Methods In the CheckMate-025 (CM025) trial (NCT01668784), involving patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) randomized to either nivolumab (NIVO) or everolimus (EVE), whole-exome sequencing (WES) data from tumor and peripheral blood samples were analyzed. The Cancer Genome Analysis pipeline was utilized to identify somatic alterations, and the STITCH pipeline was employed to determine SNP carrier status. In the BinTA-0037 (BTA-0037) trial (NCT03631706), focusing on patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC), the carrier status of a surrogate SNP rs16906062 (R2=0.66) was determined from tumor WES in the pembrolizumab (PEMBRO) arm. Within each treatment arm, time to incident AEs were compared between carriers (SNP+) and non-carriers (SNP-) via multivariable Cox regression, controlling for age, sex, race, ECOG and sample purity. A SNP´treatment interaction term was also included in the entire CM025 cohort. Censoring for AEs occurred at death or last follow-up. A recurrent event analysis for AEs was conducted using the Andersen-Gill model, controlling for the same variables. Additionally, overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were also assessed. Results In total, 534 pts were included (NIVO: n=189, PEMBRO: n=152, EVE: n=193), among which 82 (15.4%) were SNP+. There were no differences in clinical and pathological characteristics between SNP+ and SNP-, except for sex (SNP+ 16.1% vs. SNP- 30.1% in females, P=0.046). Similarly, no differences in somatic alterations, including single nucleotide and copy number variants were seen between SNP+ and SNP- in CM025. SNP carrier status had no effect on OS nor PFS in all treatment arms (all P≥0.22). The rate of grade 2+ AEs was significantly higher in SNP+ vs. SNP- in the NIVO arm (Figure A, HR=2.91[1.48-5.72]), but not in the EVE (Figure B, control, non-ICI) arm (HR=0.63[0.3-1.29], SNP´treatment Pinteraction=0.002). Similarly, the rate of all grade AEs in the PEMBRO arm of BTA-0037 was higher in SNP+ vs. SNP- (Figure C, HR=2.30[1.60-4.60]). The rate of recurrent grade 2+ AEs was also significantly higher in SNP+ vs. SNP- in the NIVO arm (HR=3.43[1.83-6.43]), whereas a trend for fewer recurrent grade 2+ AEs was seen in SNP+ vs. SNP- in the EVE arm (HR=0.46[0.17-1.25], SNP´treatment Pinteraction=0.0005). Figure: Kaplan-Meier curves showing the cumulative rate of adverse events in the NIVO (A) and EVE (B) arms of CM025, as well as the PEMBRO arm of BTA0037 (C), in SNP- and SNP+. Conclusions The IL7 SNP (rs16906115) is associated with significantly higher rates of grade 2+ AEs, including recurrent events, in pts with mRCC or mNSCLC treated with single agent PD-1 inhibitors but not with non-ICI regimens, with no effect on survival and efficacy outcomes. These results confirm the SNP’s predictive potential as a biomarker for irAEs to guide therapeutic decisions in pts treated with ICIs.

Thyroid dysfunction caused by immune checkpoint inhibitors improves cancer outcomes.

A common immune-related adverse event (irAE) with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is thyroid dysfunction (TD-irAEs). The clinical presentation can be varied, and its association with prognosis remains unclear. We investigated the characteristics of TD-irAEs and their association with clinical outcomes among cancer patients treated with ICIs in a real-life setting. Response to treatment was assessed using RECIST v1.1. We calculated the probability of recurrence and survival associated with TD-irAEs using multivariable-adjusted regression and Cox proportional hazards models. In this single-center retrospective analysis, we included 238 patients (72% male) with a median age of 69.5 years. Primary tumors were melanoma (23.1%), lung (60.5%), or urothelial cancer (16.4%), treated with atezolizumab (23.1%), pembrolizumab (44.5%), ipilimumab (0.4%), and/or nivolumab (25.6%). Seventy (29%) patients developed TD-irAEs in a median time of 69 days (41-181). The incidence of TD-irAEs with combination therapy was higher than with monotherapy (67% vs 6.3%, P = 0.011). TD-irAE patients showed a higher objective response rate (ORR) than those without TD-irAEs (60% vs 42.3%, P = 0.013) and longer overall survival (OS) 45 vs 16 months, P < 0.006. Patients who developed TD-irAEs had a relative reduction of 77% (OR 0.23, 95% CI 0.11-0.47) in the risk of progression and of 47% in the risk of mortality (HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.36-0.80), independent of age, sex, primary tumor, or ICI regimen. TD-irAEs occur in nearly 30% of our patients receiving ICIs. In our analysis, TD-irAEs appeared to be associated with higher ORR and longer OS and showed a reduction in the risk of progression and mortality.

Real-world use of immune checkpoint inhibitors in advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer

ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to describe real-world use of immune checkpoint inhibitors for women with advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer.MethodsAdult women with advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer who...

International, open-label phase 2 study of regorafenib plus pembrolizumab in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) previously treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI).

4007 Background: The optimal second-line treatment for HCC after ICI is not established. Regorafenib is approved for treatment of advanced HCC after sorafenib. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the activity of regorafenib plus pembrolizumab in patients with advanced HCC who progressed on only one prior ICI regimen. Methods: Patients aged ≥18 years, CP Class A, BCLC stage B or C, and ECOG PS of 0 or 1 received oral regorafenib 90 mg once daily 3 weeks (wk) on/1 wk off plus i.v. pembrolizumab 400 mg every 6 wk. The daily regorafenib dose could be escalated to 120 mg after the first 4-wk cycle of regorafenib if tolerated. Pembrolizumab dose reductions were not allowed. Cohorts were defined by prior treatment: Cohort 1 = atezolizumab + bevacizumab; Cohort 2 = any other ICI regimen (alone or combination). Primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR) by independent central review (RECIST 1.1). Results: 95 patients were treated in 8 countries; Cohort 2 appeared to have more favorable disease characteristics (Table). Most common prior ICIs in Cohort 2 were durvalumab (30%), nivolumab (30%), ipilimumab (22%), and pembrolizumab (19%). Overall, median follow up was 7.1 months (mo). Median duration of regorafenib/pembrolizumab treatment (including interruptions, delays) was shorter in Cohort 1 vs Cohort 2 (11.0/9.4 wk vs 21.4/24.1 wk). ORR was 5.9% in Cohort 1 and 11.1% in Cohort 2; stable disease rates were 48.5% and 63.0%, respectively. Median PFS was 2.8 mo in Cohort 1 and 4.2 mo in Cohort 2. Overall, treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE) were grade 3 in 56% of patients and grade 4 in 5%; drug-related grade 3 and 4 TEAE occurred in 37% and 3%, respectively. One patient (Cohort 1) had a grade 5 drug-related TEAE (cardiac arrest). Most common drug-related TEAE were palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia syndrome (39%), asthenia (33%), decreased appetite (32%), diarrhea (28%), and hypertension (20%). Biomarkers assessed in paired biopsies (baseline and wk 6/day 1) showed on-treatment reductions in macrophages and angiogenesis RNA signatures. Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is the first prospective evaluation of a kinase inhibitor plus an ICI following first-line ICI therapy for HCC. Regorafenib plus pembrolizumab had modest activity in second line after first-line ICI regimens. The safety profile of the combination was consistent with those of either drug. Optimal treatment for patients with advanced HCC who progress after an ICI regimen remains an unmet need. Biomarker findings will be detailed in presentation. Clinical trial information: NCT04696055 . [Table: see text]

Neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitors for patients with resectable stage III/IV melanoma: A nationwide real-life study in France (NEOMEL).

9578 Background: Several studies have shown the efficacy of neoadjuvant treatment (NT) with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) for resectable stage III/IV melanoma. However, real-life data are lacking. Methods: NEOMEL is a national multicenter retrospective study assessing the efficacy and tolerability of NT with ICI (NT-ICI) for resectable metastatic melanoma in a real-life setting. Data were obtained in patients (pts) with resectable stage III/IV melanoma who initiated NT-ICI (at least one infusion). Primary endpoint was pathologic complete response (pCR) (i.e no residual tumor) rate. Secondary endpoints were pathologic response (pR) according to INMC, radiologic response (RECIST), safety profile (CTCAE) and survival outcomes. Results: A total of 166 pts with resectable stage III/IV melanoma were included. Median age was 67 years (range, 24-96). Most pts had primary cutaneous melanoma (n=157, 89%), stage IIIB-D disease (n=156, 94%); a BRAF V600-mutant melanoma was observed in 47% (n=78); 8% (n=14) pts had received a previous systemic treatment. The median number of infusions of NT-ICI was 3 (range, 1-5). ICI regimens were anti-PD-1 monotherapy (n=122, 73%) or nivolumab + ipilimumab (NIVO + IPI) (n=44, 27%). Median follow-up was 6.5 months (range, 1-85). Overall, 143 pts (86%) underwent surgery. A pCR was observed in 44% of pts (n=63/143), including 52% (n=51/99) treated with anti-PD-1 monotherapy, and 27% (n=12/44) treated with NIVO + IPI. Of note, 78 pts (54%) were treated with 3 infusions of pembrolizumab (PBZ) (according to SWOG 1801 protocol) and had a pCR in 45% (n=35). A pR was assessed according to INMC criteria in 58% of pts (n=83/143): 51% of pCR (n=42), 8% of near-pCR (n=7) corresponding to a major pR of 59% (n=49/83), 16% of pathologic partial response (n=13) and 25% of pathologic non-response (n=21). Twenty-three pts (14%) did not undergo surgery because of progressive disease (n=10), clinical and radiologic responses (8 complete responses, 1 partial response, 1 stable disease), toxicity (n=2) or patient’s choice (n=1). Radiologic overall response rate according to RECIST (data available after NT in 49% of pts) was 54% (n = 44/82). All grade immune-related adverse events (irAEs) of NT-ICI occurred in 31% (n=51) of pts, including grade 3-4 irAEs in 10% (n=17) and one grade 5 irAE (pneumonitis with PBZ). Severe irAEs (grade 3 or more) were observed in 4% (n=4/99) of pts treated with anti-PD1 monotherapy and 32% (n=14/44) of pts treated with NIVO + IPI. Adjuvant treatment was started for 120 pts (84%). At last follow-up, 26 pts (18%) have had recurrence after surgery, including 3 pts with a pCR and 23 pts with a non-pCR to NT-ICI. Survival data are not yet available. Conclusions: NT-ICI for advanced melanoma demonstrated its efficacy with high rates of pCR in a real-life setting and an acceptable safety profile, particularly NT anti-PD1 monotherapy.

Germline variation and risk of immune-related adverse events (irAEs): A real-world BioVU study.

10582 Background: IrAEs are prevalent in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) and mimic classical autoimmune diseases. IrAE risk prediction could improve clinical decision making and patient safety for ICI-treated patients. Classical autoimmune diseases show strong associations with germline polymorphisms and with Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA) variants, though it is unclear if these same genetic risk factors predispose to irAEs. To identify both tolerant and irAE patients, we mined Vanderbilt University Medical Center (VUMC) BioVU, a biorepository of &gt;300K DNA samples linked to de-identified medical records and evaluated genome-wide and imputed HLA class I and II associations with irAE risk. Methods: We identified 1,472 ICI-treated BioVU subjects: 428 with ≥ 1 irAE, and 1044 with no irAEs ≤ 6 months from last ICI treatment. Genotyping was performed by Illumina MEGAEX array. Records were screened for use of irAE therapies ( e.g. systemic corticosteroids, infliximab, levothyroxine) after ICI treatment, with chart adjudication. Association tests were performed using Firth’s logistic regression adjusting for age, sex, ICI regimen, and 3 principal components to assess 1) HLA Class I and II alleles; 2) HLA evolutionary divergence; and 3) GWAS to evaluate total irAEs, organ-specific irAEs, or other specific irAEs (sample size permitting). Endocrine irAEs were excluded to be presented in a separate focused study. Results: In GWAS analyses, 53 SNPs and 23 SNPs were identified significantly (nominal p ≤ 5e-8) associated with GI and neuro-toxicity, respectively. We did not identify any significant HLA class I or II associations with irAE or organ-grouped irAEs, including most evolutionary divergence association tests. We noted marginal association (FDR=0.12, OR=6.85) of rheumatic irAEs with HLA-DRB1*10:01, an HLA class II allele with RA-specific epitope motif. Patients experiencing lung irAEs were more likely to have a high HLA class I and II evolutionary divergence sum (p = 0.013 and p=0.046, respectively). Assessment of associations with specific irAEs, validation of known associations with irAEs or autoimmune disorders, including polygenic risk scores, are underway. Conclusions: We had several SNP-irAE associations, though appropriate classification schemas to maximize power and detect genetic variation remain challenging. We will soon expand with 1,800 additional ICI-treated patients (n=~3,300 in toto), creating a robust resource for irAE genetic associations. [Table: see text]

Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) rechallenge after immune-related adverse events (irAE) requiring hospitalization: A single-center 10-year experience.

e14609 Background: ICI rechallenge after irAE has become a significant clinical dilemma, with irAE recurrence rates of 30-40% after rechallenge. Here we examine factors influencing ICI rechallenge rates across a 10-year period at the Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH), where the Severe Immunotherapy Complications service is available to provide multidisciplinary irAE expertise. Methods: We included patients admitted to MGH for an irAE from August 2011 to July 2023. We collected baseline demographics, ICI regimens, and irAE features. The choice of ICI used at rechallenge was grouped into 3 categories: 1) restarting an ICI within the same class, 2) switching classes (CTLA-4 to PD-(L)1 or vice versa), or 3) de-escalating from combination to monotherapy. Chi-square and Mann-Whitney U tests were applied to descriptive statistics. Results: Among 5882 patients treated with ICI, 671 (11.4%) patients were admitted for irAE. The median age was 67.6 (IQR, 59-74.9) years and 58% were male. Initial ICI regimens consisted of anti-PD-(L)1 (64.8%), anti-CTLA4 (10.9%), and ICI combinations (24.3%). 174 of 671 patients (25.9%) were rechallenged after an irAE requiring hospitalization. Rechallenge was common after rheumatologic, endocrine, dermatologic irAE and GI irAE, but rare after cardiac, neurologic, or pulmonary irAE (Table 1). The median time to rechallenge was 25 days (IQR 18-91) after endocrine irAE and 72 days (IQR 40-209) after non-endocrine irAE (p&lt;0.001). Rechallenge was more common in melanoma (35%, p&lt;0.001), and less common in lung (13.6%, p&lt;0.001) and GU cancers (10%, p=0.003). Rechallenge rates were significantly higher in patients initially on combination therapy (39.6%) versus PD-(L)1 monotherapy (15.5%), p&lt;0.001. Of those rechallenged, 43.2% initially on combination therapy were de-escalated to monotherapy and 53% were restarted within the same class. Amongst the PD-(L)1 monotherapy group, 88.4% were restarted within the same class and 11.6% switched classes. Conclusions: Here we examine practice patterns at a large academic center, where 25.9% of patients with irAE requiring hospitalization were rechallenged. Rechallenge was more prevalent in patients with melanoma or on ICI combination therapy, whereas it was less frequent following cardiac, neurologic, or pulmonary irAE. Under adequate risk-benefit evaluation, close monitoring, and multidisciplinary care, ICI rechallenge can be considered. [Table: see text]

Cardiomyopathy among recipients of immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy: A prospective study.

e24025 Background: Patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) may develop cardiomyopathy, but data are limited on the rate of cardiomyopathy incidence. The aim of this study was to assess the occurrence of cardiomyopathy among ICI recipients. Methods: In this prospective surveillance study, echocardiograms and EKG were performed at baseline, and quarterly during the first year of ICI therapy. New or worsening cardiomyopathy was defined as left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) decline of &gt; 10% from baseline to &lt; 50%. B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) and troponin were assessed weekly during the first three weeks of ICI therapy. Subsequent troponin for myocarditis assessment was tested as needed per treating oncology team. Results: A total of 23 patients were enrolled with mean age 73±10 years, 35% female, 74% Caucasian, and body mass index 31±7 kg/m2. Cardiovascular risk factors included hypertension (86%), diabetes mellitus (29%), myocardial infarction (19%) and smoking (10%), and prior radiation treatment (30%). Malignancies included lung cancer (50%), renal cell carcinoma (14%), and Merkel cell carcinoma or urothelial carcinoma (9% each). ICI regimen included pembrolizumab (48%), nivolumab (43%), and ipilimumab or atezolizumab (4% each). There was no change in weekly troponin or BNP, or quarterly QRS duration on EKG, and no myocarditis cases were observed. Between baseline and at 1-year since ICI therapy initiation, there was no change in QRS duration on EKG, as well as no change in median LVEF (59% [IQR 46-67] vs 61% [IQR 58-65], p = 0.48), or global longitudinal strain (18% [IQR 15-20]) vs 19% [IQR 18-21], p = 0.11). New cardiomyopathy occurred in 1 (4%) patient at 3 months following ICI initiation with LVEF drop from 53% to 38% and without troponin elevation to suggest myocarditis, corresponding to an incidence rate of 43.5 cases per 1000 person-years of observation. Conclusions: In this prospective surveillance study, new cardiomyopathy was observed after ICI treatment, although the incidence was low. Larger studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Adverse events associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors in non-small cell lung cancer: a safety analysis of clinical trials and FDA pharmacovigilance system.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the application of ICIs can also cause treatment-related adverse events (trAEs) and immune-related adverse events (irAEs). This study was to evaluate both the irAEs and trAEs of different ICI strategies for NSCLC based on randomized clinical trials (RCTs). The study also examined real-world pharmacovigilance data from the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) regarding claimed ICI-associated AEs in clinical practice. Based on Pubmed, Embase, Medline, and the Cochrane CENTRAL, we retrieved RCTs comparing ICIs with chemotherapy drugs or with different ICI regimens for the treatment of NSCLC up to October 20, 2023. Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA) was performed using odds ratios (ORs) with 95% credible intervals (95%CrI). Separately, a retrospective pharmacovigilance study was performed based on FAERS database, extracting ICI-associated AEs in NSCLC patients between the first quarter (Q1) of 2004 and Q4 of 2023. The proportional reports reporting odds ratio was calculated to analyze the disproportionality. The NMA included 51 RCTs that involved a total of 26,958 patients with NSCLC. Based on the lowest risk of any trAEs, cemiplimab, tislelizumab, and durvalumab were ranked as the best. Among the agents associated with the lowest risk of grades 3-5 trAEs, tislelizumab, avelumab, and nivolumab were most likely to rank highest. As far as any or grades 3-5 irAEs are concerned, atezolizumab plus bevacizumab plus chemotherapy is considered the most safety option. However, it is associated with a high risk of grades 3-5 trAEs. As a result of FAERS pharmacovigilance data analysis, 9,420 AEs cases have been identified in 7,339 NSCLC patients treated with ICIs, and ICIs were related to statistically significant positive signal with 311 preferred terms (PTs), and comprehensively investigated and identified those AEs highly associated with ICIs. In total, 152 significant signals were associated with Nivolumab, with malignant neoplasm progression, death, and hypothyroidism being the most frequent PTs. These findings revealed that ICIs differed in their safety profile. ICI treatment strategies can be improved and preventive methods can be developed for NSCLC patients based on our results.

Multicentre phase II trial of cabozantinib in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma after immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment

Prospective data on treatment after immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are lacking. We conducted a phase II multicentre study on cabozantinib after ICI treatment in HCC. This is an investigator-initiated, single-arm, clinical trial involving academic centres in Hong Kong and Korea. Key eligibility criteria included diagnosis of HCC, refractoriness to prior ICI-based treatment, and Child-Pugh A liver function. A maximum of two prior lines of therapy were allowed. All patients were commenced on cabozantinib at 60mg/day. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Forty-seven patients were recruited from Oct 2020 to May 2022; 27 and 20 patients had received one and two prior therapies, respectively. Median follow-up was 11.2 months. The median PFS was 4.1 months (95% CI 3.3-5.3). The median overall survival (OS) was 9.9 months (95% CI 7.3-14.4), and the 1-year OS rate was 45.3%. Partial response and stable disease occurred in 3 (6.4%) and 36 (76.6%) patients, respectively. When used as a second-line treatment (n= 27), cabozantinib was associated with a median PFS and OS of 4.3 (95% CI 3.3-6.7) and 14.3 (95% CI 8.9-NR) months, respectively. The corresponding median PFS and OS were 4.3 (95% CI 3.3-11.0) and 14.3 (95% CI 9.0-NR) months, respectively, for those receiving ICI-based regimens with proven benefits (n= 17). The most common grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse event was thrombocytopenia (6.4%). The median dose of cabozantinib was 40mg/day. The number of prior therapies was an independent prognosticator (one vs. two; hazard ratio= 0.37; p= 0.03). Cabozantinib demonstrated efficacy in patients who had received prior ICI regimens; survival data for second-line cabozantinib following first-line ICI regimens provide a reference for future clinical trial design. The number of prior lines of treatment may be considered a stratification factor in randomised studies. Prospective data on systemic treatment following prior immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are lacking. This phase II clinical trial provides efficacy and safety data on cabozantinib in patients who had received prior ICI-based treatment. Exploratory analyses showed that the performance of cabozantinib differed significantly when used as a second- or third-line treatment. The above data could be used as a reference for clinical practice and the design of future clinical trials on subsequent treatment lines following ICIs. NCT04588051.

Abstract 6118: Sex-related disparity in immune checkpoint inhibitor benefit for patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract Sex-related dimorphism in cancer incidence and immune response is widely recognized, yet the impact of an individual's sex on the effectiveness of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICIs) for patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) remains poorly understood. In this study, we conducted a comprehensive meta-analysis to evaluate the heterogeneity of ICIs in patients with advanced ESCC. We collected studies from PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus, spanning from the inception of the databases to September 30, 2023. These studies focused on phase III randomized trials comparing first-line ICIs (PD-1/PD-L1) plus chemotherapy with chemotherapy alone for advanced or metastatic ESCC. Additionally, we reviewed abstracts and presentations from AACR, ASCO, ESMO, and WCLC. Inclusion criteria mandated the reporting of overall survival (OS) data stratified by sex and nonselective baseline PD-L1 expression. The study adhered to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The analysis included 6 randomized clinical trials comprising 3603 ESCC patients, of whom 3090 (85.8%) were male and 513 (14.2%) were female. A significant OS benefit was observed for ICIs plus chemotherapy in all patients (HR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.62-0.74; P &amp;lt; 0.001). Similarly, ICIs plus chemotherapy correlated with a significantly prolonged OS in males (HR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.61-0.74, P &amp;lt; 0.001). However, there was no significant OS benefit observed in females with ICIs plus chemotherapy (HR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.58-1.09; P = 0.148). Females had a tendency toward less benefit than males (pooled HR, 1.18; 95% CI, 0.89-1.57; P = 0.245). Our findings suggest that there is no statistically significant association between patient sex and the efficacy of ICIs for ESCC patients. Importantly, we report, for the first time, a lack of survival benefit with the ICI plus chemotherapy regimen in the first-line setting compared to chemotherapy alone in female ESCC patients. Citation Format: Chaoqi Zhang, Peng Wu, Jingjing Liu, Dongyu Li, Nan Sun, Jie He. Sex-related disparity in immune checkpoint inhibitor benefit for patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 6118.

Abstract 912: CheckpointPx, an interpretable radiology AI tool, predicts checkpoint blockade benefit independent of PDL1 status in non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC): A multi-institutional validation study

Abstract Background: Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICIs) are a cornerstone in the treatment of cancers such as Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC). Despite the standard use of biomarkers such as PD-L1 expression for selecting ICI regimens, recent studies suggest missed opportunities for benefit in PD-L1 low/negative patients. Therefore, there is an urgent need for new biomarker strategies capable of guiding the use of ICIs in NSCLC. We introduce and validate an AI-powered radiology tool for ICI patient selection that provides interpretable predictions by quantifying aspects of tumor biology on baseline CT scans directly associated with ICI efficacy, such as tumor heterogeneity and twistedness of the tumor-associated vasculature. Methods: We analyzed CT scans of 439 patients treated with ICI at 4 institutions (D1-D4) using the Picture Health Px platform. Experienced radiologists and physicians across institutions delineated target lesions on baseline CT scans. A deep learning model was used to segment pulmonary vessels. CheckpointPx v1.11, an interpretable neural network incorporating quantitative features extracted from within the tumor and its vasculature, was trained to predict ICI response (defined as disease control per RECIST best overall response) on n=247 patients (D1-D3). It was assessed with respect to response and progression free-survival (PFS) on 192 patients (D2-D4), with D4 (n=105) being an external validation set. CheckpointPx was also evaluated within PDL1 subsets among testing set patients where available (n=138). Results: The cohort was predominantly late stage (Stage 3/4) (&amp;gt;85%) and was mixed with respect to ICI line of treatment (1st-4th). 122 of 247 (49%) and 119 of 192 (62%) were responders in training and test cohorts respectively. CheckpointPx included 16 features, such as entropy-based heterogeneity and quantitative vessel tortuosity (twistedness). The model predicted response to ICI with an AUC=0.65 on the test set. The CheckpointPx High Risk group significantly stratified patients by PFS (HR=1.67 [1.22-2.28], p=0.001). This separation remained significant within the subset of PDL1-negative (HR=2.71 [1.35-5.44], p=0.005) and PDL1-positive patients (HR=2.05 [1.22-3.46], p=0.007). Conclusions: From baseline radiology, CheckpointPx was shown to strongly predict ICI outcomes across multiple institutions, NSCLC stages, and lines of ICI. Furthermore, the tool stratified patients by ICI benefit within both PDL1-positive and negative subsets - suggesting the potential of CheckpointPx to address critical gaps in the NSCLC biomarker landscape. CheckpointPx is driven by interpretable imaging biomarkers, and thus its predictions are tied to specific and quantifiable phenotypic attributes of the tumor and its microenvironment. Citation Format: Amogh Hiremath, Seyoung Lee, Jeeyeon Lee, Peter Haseok Kim, Kai Zhang, Salie Lee, Monica Yadav, Maria Jose Aguilera Chuchuca, Taegyu Um, Myungwoo Nam, Liam Il-Young Chung, Hye Sung Kim, Jisang Yu, Trie Arni Djunadi, Leeseul Kim, Youjin Oh, Sungmi Yoon, Zunairah Shah, Yuchan Kim, Ilene Hong, Grace Kang, Jessica Jang, Amy Cho, Soowon Lee, Cecilia Nam, Timothy Hong, Yury S. Velichko, Amit Gupta, Vamsidhar Velcheti, Anant Madabhushi, Nathaniel Braman, Young Kwang Chae. CheckpointPx, an interpretable radiology AI tool, predicts checkpoint blockade benefit independent of PDL1 status in non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC): A multi-institutional validation study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 912.

Clinical spectrum and evolution of immune-checkpoint inhibitors toxicities over a decade—a worldwide perspective

Immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have revolutionized cancer treatment by harnessing the immune system but ICI can induce life-threatening immune-related adverse events (irAE) affecting every organ. We extracted irAE from VigiBase, the international pharmacovigilance database, first reported in 2008 until 01/2023 to characterize irAE reporting trends, clinical features, risk factors and outcomes. We distinguished 25 types of irAE (n=50,347cases, single irAE/case in 84.9%). Cases mainly involved anti-PD1 (programmed-death-1) monotherapy (62.4%) in male (61.7%) aged 64.3±12.6 years. After 2020 vs. prior to 2016, proportion of anti-CTLA4 (Cytotoxic-T-Lymphocyte-Antigen-4) monotherapy prescription almost vanished (1.6% vs. 47%, respectively) contrasting with increased use of anti-PDL1 (PD1-ligand) monotherapy (18% vs. 0.9%) and anti-CTLA4+anti-PD(L)1 combination (20% vs. 8.9%). Anti-LAG3 (Lymphocyte-Activation-Gene-3) prescription was limited (<1%) in the studied timeframe. After 2020, over 14 different cancer types were treated vs. almost exclusively melanoma and lung cancers before 2016. Overall, the most reported irAE were skin reactions (22.9%), pneumonitis (18.5%), enterocolitis (14.4%) and thyroiditis (12.1%). ICI-myotoxicities (6.6%) included myositis, myocarditis and myasthenia-gravis like syndrome and were the most overlapping irAE (up to 30% overlap, vs. <3% in general for other inter-irAE overlap). The top factors associated with specific irAE (odds-ratio>5) were presence of thymic cancer for ICI-myotoxicities or hepatitis; presence of melanoma for vitiligo, uveitis or sarcoidosis; specific types of ICI regimen (anti-LAG3 for meningitis, anti-CTLA4 for hypophysitis); and specific reporting regions (eastern Asia for cholangitis). Median time-to-onset ranged from 31 to 273 days, being shortest for myotoxicities and most delayed for skin-bullous auto-immune reactions. Overall fatality was highest for myocarditis=27.6%, myasthenia=23.1%, severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCAR)=22.1%, myositis=21.9%, pneumonitis=21%, and encephalomyelitis=18%; generally decreasing after 2020, except for myasthenia and SCAR. When reported, irAE recurrence rate after rechallenge was 28.9% (n=275/951). This up-to-date comprehensive worldwide pharmacovigilance study defines the spectrum, characteristics, and evolution of irAE reporting summarizing over a decade of use. Multiple risk factors and clinical peculiarities for specific irAE have been identified as signals to guide clinical practice and future research. Paul Gougis was supported by the academic program: "Contrats ED: Programme blanc Institut Curie PSL" for the conduct of his PhD. Baptiste Abbar was supported by "the Fondation ARC Pour le Rechercher Sur le Cancer". The RT2L research group (Institut Curie) was supported by the academic program "SHS INCa", Sanofi iTech award, and by Monoprix∗.

Comparative safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors in recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

To indirectly compare the safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in the treatment of recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M HNSCC) by network meta-analysis (NMA). Through August 1, 2023, we searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov for randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of ICI-based treatment for R/M HNSCC. Outcomes of interest included overall and organ-specific immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Addis 16.5 software was used to perform NMA. Confidence in Network Meta-Analysis (CINeMA) was used to assess confidence in the evidence. Nine RCTs were included in this NMA, involving a total of 4016 patients. The general safety of ICI-based treatments in descending order was as follows: Durvalumab + Tremelimumab, Camrelizumab + Chemotherapy, Durvalumab, Toripalimab + Chemotherapy, Pembrolizumab, Pembrolizumab + Chemotherapy, Nivolumab, Tremelimumab. There were differences in the toxicity profile among Toripalimab + Chemotherapy (dermatologic irAEs), Camrelizumab + Chemotherapy (hypothyroidism), Nivolumab + Ipilimumab (hyperthyroidism, pneumonitis), Pembrolizumab (nephrotoxicity), Pembrolizumab + Chemotherapy (colitis). ICI-based treatment increased the incidence of endocrine irAEs (hyperthyroidism and hypothyroidism) and pneumonitis compared to conventional therapy. Besides, the combination of dual ICIs resulted in a greater occurrence of irAEs compared to the use of a single ICI. The safety ranking of treatments based on ICIs is significantly influenced by specific irAEs. These irAEs, which vary in type and severity, play a crucial role in determining the overall safety profile of each ICI regimen. PROSPERO CRD42023460267.

ADGRE5-centered Tsurv model in T cells recognizes responders to neoadjuvant cancer immunotherapy.

Neoadjuvant immunotherapy with anti-programmed death-1 (neo-antiPD1) has revolutionized perioperative methods for improvement of overall survival (OS), while approaches for major pathologic response patients' (MPR) recognition along with methods for overcoming non-MPR resistance are still in urgent need. We utilized and integrated publicly-available immune checkpoint inhibitors regimens (ICIs) single-cell (sc) data as the discovery datasets, and innovatively developed a cell-communication analysis pipeline, along with a VIPER-based-SCENIC process, to thoroughly dissect MPR-responding subsets. Besides, we further employed our own non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) ICIs cohort's sc data for validation in-silico. Afterward, we resorted to ICIs-resistant murine models developed by us with multimodal investigation, including bulk-RNA-sequencing, Chip-sequencing and high-dimensional cytometry by time of flight (CYTOF) to consolidate our findings in-vivo. To comprehensively explore mechanisms, we adopted 3D ex-vivo hydrogel models for analysis. Furthermore, we constructed an ADGRE5-centered Tsurv model from our discovery dataset by machine learning (ML) algorithms for a wide range of tumor types (NSCLC, melanoma, urothelial cancer, etc.) and verified it in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) sc datasets. Through a meta-analysis of multimodal sequential sc sequencing data from pre-ICIs and post-ICIs, we identified an MPR-expanding T cells meta-cluster (MPR-E) in the tumor microenvironment (TME), characterized by a stem-like CD8+ T cluster (survT) with STAT5-ADGRE5 axis enhancement compared to non-MPR or pre-ICIs TME. Through multi-omics analysis of murine TME, we further confirmed the existence of survT with silenced function and immune checkpoints (ICs) in MPR-E. After verification of the STAT5-ADGRE5 axis of survT in independent ICIs cohorts, an ADGRE5-centered Tsurv model was then developed through ML for identification of MPR patients pre-ICIs and post-ICIs, both in TME and PBMCs, which was further verified in pan-cancer immunotherapy cohorts. Mechanistically, we unveiled ICIs stimulated ADGRE5 upregulation in a STAT5-IL32 dependent manner in a 3D ex-vivo system (3D-HYGTIC) developed by us previously, which marked Tsurv with better survival flexibility, enhanced stemness and potential cytotoxicity within TME. Our research provides insights into mechanisms underlying MPR in neo-antiPD1 and a well-performed model for the identification of non-MPR.

Incidence of Cutaneous Immune-Related Adverse Events and Outcomes in Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Containing Regimens: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are used to treat many cancers, and cutaneous immune-related adverse events (cirAEs) are among the most frequently encountered toxic effects. Understanding the incidence and prognostic associations of cirAEs is of importance as their uses in different settings, combinations, and tumor types expand. To evaluate the incidence of cirAEs and their association with outcome measures across a variety of ICI regimens and cancers, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of published trials of anti-programmed death-1/ligand-1 (PD-1/PD-L1) and anti-cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4) ICIs, both alone and in combination with chemotherapy, antiangiogenic agents, or other ICIs in patients with melanoma, renal cell carcinoma, non-small cell lung cancer, and urothelial carcinoma. Key findings of our study include variable cirAE incidence among tumors and ICI regimens, positive association with increased cirAE incidence and response rate, as well as significant association between increased vitiligo incidence and overall survival. Across 174 studies, rash, pruritis, and vitiligo were the most reported cirAEs, with incidences of 16.7%, 18.0%, and 6.6%, respectively. Higher incidence of cirAEs was associated with ICI combination regimens and with CTLA-4-containing regimens, particularly with higher doses of ipilimumab, as compared to PD-1/L1 monotherapies. Outcome measures including response rate and progression-free survival were positively correlated with incidence of cirAEs. The response rate and incidence of pruritis, vitiligo, and rash were associated with expected rises in incidence of 0.17% (p = 0.0238), 0.40% (p = 0.0010), and 0.18% (p = 0.0413), respectively. Overall survival was positively correlated with the incidence of pruritis, vitiligo, and rash; this association was significant for vitiligo (p = 0.0483). Our analysis provides benchmark incidence rates for cirAEs and links cirAEs with favorable treatment outcomes at a study level across diverse solid tumors and multiple ICI regimens.