Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors In Colorectal Cancer Research Articles

Immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated gastrointestinal adverse events in patients with colorectal cancer.

e14708 Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are successfully used to treat microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) tumors. While immune checkpoint inhibitor related colitis is a frequent and devastating immune related adverse event (irAE) of these agents, the incidence and characteristics of this inflammatory toxicity in patients with MSI-H colorectal cancers has not been examined. We aimed to describe the characteristics and clinical profile of patients diagnosed with luminal gastrointestinal irAE in patients treated with ICI for colorectal cancer in a tertiary cancer care center. Methods: This is a retrospective analysis that included adult cancer patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer that received ICI between 6/1/2014 and 12/31/2022. We report data on those that developed colitis as an irAE up to 3 months after the last dose of ICI confirmed by laboratory and/or imaging report. We included patients’ demographic characteristics, oncologic profile and outcomes as well as clinical course, endoscopic features as well as treatment and outcomes in terms of luminal gastrointestinal irAEs. Results: Out of 474 patients with colorectal cancer on ICI in our study period, only 18 developed a gastrointestinal irAE with an incidence of 3.8%. Patients were primarily Caucasian (88.8%) males (61.1%) with a median age of 69.5 years. The majority of these patients received combination therapy with anti-PD1/L1 and CTLA-4 (50%). 66.6 % received ICI for MSI-H colorectal cancer. 11.1% of our sample were noted to have a second cancer-melanoma. The major-ity of patients had grade 1-2 colitis (61.2%) and grade 1-2 diarrhea (88.8%). Only 5 patients underwent endoscopic evaluation of whom, 2 had ulcerative inflammation necessitating use of selective immunosuppressive therapy with biologics. 61.1% had to withhold cancer treatment due toxicity. With regards to other gastrointestinal irAEs among this population, 41.4% and 5.8% were noted to have liver and pancreas toxicity respectively, with a median CTCAE grade of severity 2. The most common treatment for these toxicities were steroids. Conclusions: Luminal gastrointestinal irAEs seem to occur less frequently and at a lower severity among patients with MSI-H colorectal cancer after checkpoint inhibitors exposure compared to the overall incidence of the same among other cancers reported in literature. Larger prospective studies are necessary to determine the role of tumor biology and the gut microbiome in the disease profile and severity of immune related adverse events of the GI organ system. [Table: see text]

Molecular insights into clinical trials for immune checkpoint inhibitors in colorectal cancer: Unravelling challenges and future directions.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a complex disease with diverse etiologies and clinical outcomes. Despite considerable progress in development of CRC therapeutics, challenges remain regarding the diagnosis and management of advanced stage metastatic CRC (mCRC). In particular, the five-year survival rate is very low since mCRC is currently rarely curable. Over the past decade, cancer treatment has significantly improved with the introduction of cancer immunotherapies, specifically immune checkpoint inhibitors. Therapies aimed at blocking immune checkpoints such as PD-1, PD-L1, and CTLA-4 target inhibitory pathways of the immune system, and thereby enhance anti-tumor immunity. These therapies thus have shown promising results in many clinical trials alone or in combination. The efficacy and safety of immunotherapy, either alone or in combination with CRC, have been investigated in several clinical trials. Clinical trials, including KEYNOTE-164 and CheckMate 142, have led to Food and Drug Administration approval of the PD-1 inhibitors pembrolizumab and nivolumab, respectively, for the treatment of patients with unresectable or metastatic microsatellite instability-high or deficient mismatch repair CRC. Unfortunately, these drugs benefit only a small percentage of patients, with the benefits of immunotherapy remaining elusive for the vast majority of CRC patients. To this end, primary and secondary resistance to immunotherapy remains a significant issue, and further research is necessary to optimize the use of immunotherapy in CRC and identify biomarkers to predict the response. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the clinical trials involving immune checkpoint inhibitors in CRC. The underlying rationale, challenges faced, and potential future steps to improve the prognosis and enhance the likelihood of successful trials in this field are discussed.

Differential Responses to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors are Governed by Diverse Mismatch Repair Gene Alterations.

The response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) colorectal cancer and endometrial cancer is variable. Here, we explored the differential response to ICIs according to different mismatch repair alterations. Colorectal cancer (N = 13,701) and endometrial cancer (N = 3,315) specimens were tested at Caris Life Sciences. Median overall survival (mOS) was estimated using Kaplan-Meier. The prediction of high-, intermediate-, and low-affinity epitopes by tumor mutation burden (TMB) values was conducted using R-squared (R2). Compared with mutL (MLH1 and PMS2) co-loss, the mOS was longer in mutS (MSH2 and MSH6) co-loss in all colorectal cancer (54.6 vs. 36 months; P = 0.0.025) and endometrial cancer (81.5 vs. 48.2 months; P < 0.001) patients. In ICI-treated patients, the mOS was longer in mutS co-loss in colorectal cancer [not reached (NR) vs. 36 months; P = 0.011). In endometrial cancer, the mOS was NR vs. 42.2 months; P = 0.711]. The neoantigen load (NAL) in mutS co-loss compared with mutL co-loss was higher in colorectal cancer (high-affinity epitopes: 25.5 vs. 19; q = 0.017, intermediate: 39 vs. 32; q = 0.004, low: 87.5 vs. 73; q < 0.001) and endometrial cancer (high-affinity epitopes: 15 vs. 11; q = 0.002, intermediate: 27.5 vs. 19; q < 0.001, low: 59 vs. 41; q < 0.001), respectively. R2 ranged from 0.25 in mutS co-loss colorectal cancer to 0.95 in mutL co-loss endometrial cancer. Patients with mutS co-loss experienced longer mOS in colorectal cancer and endometrial cancer and better response to ICIs in colorectal cancer. Among all explored biomarkers, NAL was higher in mutS co-loss and may be a potential driving factor for the observed better outcomes. TMB did not reliably predict NAL.

Centrosomal Protein 55 (CEP55) Drives Immune Exclusion and Resistance to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Colorectal Cancer.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) currently ranks as the third most common cancer in the United States, and its incidence is on the rise, especially among younger individuals. Despite the remarkable success of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in various cancers, most CRC patients fail to respond due to intrinsic resistance mechanisms. While microsatellite instability-high phenotypes serve as a reliable positive predictive biomarker for ICI treatment, the majority of CRC patients with microsatellite-stable (MSS) tumors remain ineligible for this therapeutic approach. In this study, we investigated the role of centrosomal protein 55 (CEP55) in shaping the tumor immune microenvironment in CRC. CEP55 is overexpressed in multiple cancer types and was shown to promote tumorigenesis by upregulating the PI3K/AKT pathway. Our data revealed that elevated CEP55 expression in CRC was associated with reduced T cell infiltration, contributing to immune exclusion. As CRC tumors progressed, CEP55 expression increased alongside sequential mutations in crucial driver genes (APC, KRAS, TP53, and SMAD4), indicating its involvement in tumor progression. CEP55 knockout significantly impaired tumor growth in vitro and in vivo, suggesting that CEP55 plays a crucial role in tumorigenesis. Furthermore, the CEP55 knockout increased CD8+ T cell infiltration and granzyme B production, indicating improved anti-tumor immunity. Additionally, we observed reduced regulatory T cell infiltration in CEP55 knockout tumors, suggesting diminished immune suppression. Most significantly, CEP55 knockout tumors demonstrated enhanced responsiveness to immune checkpoint inhibition in a clinically relevant orthotopic CRC model. Treatment with anti-PD1 significantly reduced tumor growth in CEP55 knockout tumors compared to control tumors, suggesting that inhibiting CEP55 could improve the efficacy of ICIs. Collectively, our study underscores the crucial role of CEP55 in driving immune exclusion and resistance to ICIs in CRC. Targeting CEP55 emerges as a promising therapeutic strategy to sensitize CRC to immune checkpoint inhibition, thereby improving survival outcomes for CRC patients.

How to overcome resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitors in colorectal cancer: From mechanisms to translation.

Immunotherapy, especially with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), has shown advantages in cancer treatment and is a new hope for patients who have failed multiline therapy. However, in colorectal cancer (CRC), the benefit is limited to a small subset of patients with microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) or mismatch repair-deficient (dMMR) metastatic CRC (mCRC). In addition, 45% to 60% of dMMR/MSI-H mCRC patients showed primary or acquired resistance to ICIs. This means that these patients may have potential unknown pathways mediating immune escape. Almost all mismatch repair-proficient (pMMR) or microsatellite-stable (MSS) mCRC patients do not benefit from ICIs. In this review, we discuss the mechanisms of action of ICIs and their current status in CRC. We then discuss the mechanisms of primary and acquired resistance to ICIs in CRC. Finally, we discuss promising therapeutic strategies to overcome resistance to ICIs in the clinic.

DNAH7 mutations benefit colorectal cancer patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a malignant tumor associated with a high mortality rate. While the advent of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has been a gamechanger, only a small percentage of CRC patients benefit from ICIs. The pathological mechanism of CRC is not well understood, but somatic mutations, especially missense mutations, are believed to play an important role. This study examined the relationship between ICIs in colorectal cancer and missense mutations in the axonemal dynein heavy chain gene 7 (DNAH7). A clinical cohort (n=690) and the CRC data from the publicly available Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) were examined. Gene Set Enrichment Analysis, ESTIMATE analysis, and clinical correlation analysis were performed to explore the effects and mechanisms of DNAH7 mutation on immunotherapy in colorectal cancer. The results showed that CRC patients with DNAH7 mutations can benefit more from ICIs (P<0.05). Patients with DNAH7 mutation had higher ESTIMATE scores, immune scores, and matrix scores, compared to patients without the DNAH7 mutation (P<0.001). The transport of small molecules, keratinization, asthma, autoimmune thyroid disease, allograft rejection, and other pathways were significantly enriched in DNAH7 mutated tissues (P<0.05). The top key genes associated with the DNAH7 mutation included AQP8, MS4A12, GUCA2B, and ZG16 (P<0.01). The current study not only demonstrated the significance of DNAH7 as a risk factor and prognostic feature in CRC, but also revealed that DNAH7 mutations might affect the clinical efficacy of ICIs by impacting the tumor immune microenvironment.

Inhibition of PCSK9 enhances the antitumor effect of PD-1 inhibitor in colorectal cancer by promoting the infiltration of CD8+ T cells and the exclusion of Treg cells.

Immunotherapy especially immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has brought favorable clinical results for numerous cancer patients. However, the efficacy of ICIs in colorectal cancer (CRC) is still unsatisfactory due to the poor median progression-free survival and overall survival. Here, based on the CRC models, we tried to elucidate novel relapse mechanisms during anti-PD-1 therapy. We found that PD-1 blockade elicited a mild antitumor effect in these tumor models with both increased CD8+ T cells and Treg cells. Gene mapping analysis indicated that proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9), low-density lipoprotein receptor, transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β), and CD36 were unexpectedly upregulated during PD-1 blockade. To investigate the critical role of these proteins especially PCSK9 in tumor growth, anti-PCSK9 antibody in combination with anti-PD-1 antibody was employed to block PCSK9 and PD-1 simultaneously in CRC. Data showed that neutralizing PCSK9 during anti-PD-1 therapy elicited a synergetic antitumor effect with increased CD8+ T-cell infiltration and inflammatory cytokine releases. Moreover, the proportion of Treg cells was significantly reduced by co-inhibiting PCSK9 and PD-1. Overall, inhibiting PCSK9 can further enhance the antitumor effect of anti-PD-1 therapy in CRC, indicating that targeting PCSK9 could be a promising approach to potentiate ICI efficacy.

The differential response to immune checkpoint inhibitors in colorectal and endometrial cancer patients according to different mismatch repair alterations.

3625 Background: In colorectal cancer (CRC) and endometrial cancer (EC) patients (pts), preliminary data suggest a differential response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) according to different MMR alterations. The drivers of this difference remain unknown and no reliable predictive biomarker has been found. We explored the genomic alterations, tumor mutation burden (TMB), immune-related gene expressions and signatures, tumor microenvironment (TME), neoantigen load and median overall survival (mOS) inCRC and EC pts treated with ICIs with different MMR alterations. Methods: 13,701 CRC and 3,315 EC specimens were tested at Caris Life Sciences (Phoenix, AZ) with Next Gen Sequencing (NGS) of DNA (592-gene or whole exome) and RNA (whole transcriptome). MMR/MSI status was determined by IHC of MMR protein and/or NGS. Immune cell abundance was quantified using quanTIseq. Gene expression profiles were analyzed for T cell-inflamed signature (TIS) and IFN-gamma scores. Immune epitope prediction was performed using the NetMHCpan v4.0 method in the Immune Epitope Database. Real-world mOS was obtained from insurance claims data and calculated from tissue collection or ICIs start to last contact. Statistical significance was determined using chi-square/Fisher-Exact and adjusted for multiple comparisons (adjusted p &lt; 0.05). Results: In CRC, 84 (0.6%) pts had intact expression of MLH1 and PMS2 and co-loss of MSH2 and MSH6 (MutS) and 648 (4.7%) had co-loss of MLH1 and PMS2 and intact MSH2 and MSH6 (MutL). 117 (0.9%) had other MMR IHC loss. APC, KRAS, ERBB2, ERBB3 and MSH2 mutations rates were higher in MutS while BRAF mutation rate was higher in MutL. B cell, NK cell content and neoantigen load (high affinity epitopes: p &lt; 0.05, intermediate: p &lt; 0.01, low: p &lt; 0.001) were higher in MutS. The mOS in MutS (N = 149) vs. MutL (N = 980) was 56 months (m) vs. 36 m (p = 0.003). In ICI-treated pts, the mOS in MutS (N = 28) vs. MutL (N = 149) was not reached (NR) vs. 32 m (p = 0.005). BRAF mutation didn’t impact survival in MutL. In EC, 48 (1.4%) pts had MutS and 915 (27.6%) had MutL. 81 (2.4%) had other MMR IHC loss. IHC-PD-L1, TMB, neoantigen load (high affinity epitopes: p &lt; 0.01, intermediate: p &lt; 0.0001, low: p &lt; 0.0001), TIS, IFN-gamma scores, immune related gene expressions, TME (Macrophage M1, CD8+) were higher in MutS. The mOS in MutS (N = 94) vs. MutL (N = 1804) was NR vs. 47 m (p &lt; 0.001). In ICI-treated pts, the mOS in MutS (N = 11) vs. MutL (N = 273) was NR vs. NR (p = 0.559). Conclusions: This is the largest study to explore differential response to ICIs in CRC and EC pts with different MMR alterations. In pts with CRC and EC, the mOS was longer in MutS compared to MutL. In ICI-treated pts, the mOS was longer in MutS compared to MutL in CRC but not in EC. Among the explored biomarkers, neoantigen load was higher in MutS compared to MutL in both CRC and EC and maybe the driving factor for differential response to ICIs.

Abstract 1639: Correlation of KMT2C/D loss-of-function mutations with PD-L1 expression and response to immune checkpoint inhibitors in solid tumors

Abstract Background: Dysregulation of histone lysine methyltransferases plays important roles in the development of cancer. KMT2C and KMT2D are enzymatically active proteins that form the core of mammalian COMPASS complexes, which methylate the histone 3 lysine 4 (H3K4). A previous study revealed that PD-L1 expression is tightly controlled by H3K4 trimethylation. PD-L1 expression is a predictive biomarker for the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). We hypothesized that KMT2C/D loss-of-function (LOF) mutations may associate with PD-L1 expression and be a predictor for ICIs efficacy. Therefore, we explored the correlation between KMT2C/D LOF mutations and benefit from ICIs in solid tumors. Methods: A total of 3396 patients were enrolled in our center. The following solid tumor types were selected: NSCLC (n=1080), colorectal cancer (n=509), gastric cancer (n=269), bile duct cancer (n=122), pancreatic cancer (n=199), hepatocellular carcinoma (n=309), glioma (n=778), melanoma (130). Targeted next-generation sequencing was used to determine mutations and PD-L1 expression was assessed by immunohistochemistry assay (22C3 antibody). An ICIs treatment cohort from the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) was used for exploring the correlation between KMT2C/D LOF and ICIs efficacy. TCGA cohorts were also used. We classified the patients into two groups: KMT2C/D LOF (any truncating mutation) and non-LOF. Results: Among all patients in our cohort, 36.4% of patients had PD-L1 expression (TPS&amp;gt;10%) in the LOF group, while 23.6% of patients had PD-L1 expression in the non-LOF group (P = 0.012). However, the correlations of KMT2C/D LOF mutations with PD-L1 expression were only observed in colorectal cancer (P = 0.031) and NSCLC (P = 0.047), but not in other cancer types. In TCGA colorectal cancer cohort, the median PD-L1 expression was significantly higher in the LOF group (1.47 vs 0.60, P &amp;lt; 0.0001). There was a trend suggesting that median PD-L1 expression in the LOF group was higher in NSCLC (P = 0.0754). In addition, there were no correlations between KMT2C/D LOF mutations and PD-L1 expression in other cancer types for TCGA cohorts. In MSKCC cohort, colorectal cancer patients in the LOF group had significantly longer median overall survival (OS) after ICIs therapy (34 vs 13 months, P = 0.0485). Furthermore, the median OS was also higher in the LOF group compared with the non-LOF group in NSCLC (undefined vs 12 months, P = 0.05). Consistently, we did not see the benefit from ICIs for patients in the LOF group in other cancer types. Conclusions: Our data indicated that KMT2C/D LOF mutations were correlated with PD-L1 expression in colorectal cancer and NSCLC. Furthermore, KMT2C/D LOF mutations were also associated with better response to ICIs in colorectal cancer and NSCLC, suggesting that KMT2C/D LOF mutations can be as a useful predictor for ICIs efficacy in these two types of cancer. Citation Format: Naixin Liang, Yanling Niu, Tonghui Ma, Xin Zhang. Correlation of KMT2C/D loss-of-function mutations with PD-L1 expression and response to immune checkpoint inhibitors in solid tumors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr 1639.

Association of KMT2C/D loss-of-function mutations with tumor infiltrating lymphocytes and response to immune checkpoint inhibitors in solid tumors.

2587 Background: Dysregulation of HMTs plays an important role in tumorigenesis. KMT2C and KMT2D are enzymatically active scaffold proteins that form the core of mammalian COMPASS complexes, which methylate the histone 3 lysine 4. Both KMT2C and KMT2D are involved in the regulation of gene expression. Therefore, we explored the associations of KMT2C/D loss-of-function (LOF) mutations with the expression of immune-related genes, the levels of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), and response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Methods: KMT2C/D LOF mutations were defined as nonsense, frameshift, splice site variants within consensus regions, start lost, and stop lost/gained variants. An ICIs treatment cohort from the MSKCC was used for exploring the associations between KMT2C/D LOF mutations and ICIs efficacy. The RNA-Seq data obtained from the TCGA cohort was used for analysis of gene expression and the levels of TILs using CIBERSORT. Results: In MSKCC pan-cancer dataset, patients with KMT2C/D LOF mutations had a relatively longer median overall survival (OS) compared to those with non-LOF mutations, although the result did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.0832). Then we analyzed the predictive roles of KMT2C/D LOF mutations for each cancer type. The results showed that the predictive role of KMT2C/D LOF mutations for the clinical efficacy of ICIs therapy was only observed in colorectal cancer (P = 0.045). However, we did not find the associations of KMT2C/D LOF mutations with ICIs efficacy in bladder cancer, breast cancer, melanoma, glioma, head and neck cancer, renal cell carcinoma, NSCLC, and esophagogastric cancer. Consistently, analysis of TILs in colorectal cancer revealed that KMT2C/D LOF was associated with increased infiltration of several types of immune cells, such as CD8+ T cells (P = 0.0001), activated NK cells (P = 0.0001), M1 macrophage (P = 0.0005), M2 macrophage (P = 0.0115), and neutrophils (P = 0.0209). Meanwhile, regulatory T cells (Tregs) (P = 0.0048) and M0 macrophage (P = 0.0043) were dramatically decreased in KMT2C/D LOF group for colorectal cancer. Moreover, there were no significant relationships between KMT2C/D LOF and the levels of TILs in other cancer types. Our data also demonstrated that KMT2C and KMT2D could regulate the expression of more than 30 immune-related genes in colorectal cancer. Conclusions: Our data indicated that KMT2C/D LOF mutations were significantly correlated with better outcomes of ICIs therapy in colorectal cancer, suggesting it can be as a useful predictor for response to ICIs in colorectal cancer. Meanwhile, we found the associations of KMT2C/D LOF with the levels of TILs in colorectal cancer, but not in other cancer types, indicating that the efficacy of ICIs was consistent with the levels of TILs.

125P - Tumour mutation burden and microsatellite instability in colorectal cancer

BackgroundThe role of tumour mutation burden (TMB) as predictive biomarker of response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) is being explored in colorectal cancer (CRC). Microsatellite instability status (MSI) is currently used to identify CRC patients who may benefit from ICI. However, TMB values vary significantly among MSI CRC. In addition, selected microsatellite stable (MSS) with high TMB might also benefit treatment with ICI. MethodsTMB evaluation was performed with the Oncomine Tumor Mutation Load Assay (OTML, Thermofisher) on the Ion S5XL platform. Data analysis was carried out using Ion Reporter Software v5.10. TMB was calculated as the total number of non-synonymous somatic single nucleotide variants (SNVs) and indels divided by number of bases sequenced. MSI status was analysed by means of the Idylla MSI assay (Biocartis), which evaluates the presence of mutations in 7 novel MSI loci. ResultsTMB analysis was performed on 106 formalin-fixed paraffin embedded CRC samples and the data were compared with the MSI results. The Idylla assay classified 68 samples as MSS and 38 samples as microsatellite instable (MSI-H). The TMB values ranged from zero to 21.22 (median: 5.005) in the MSS and from 13.42 to 204.8 in the MSI-H group (median: 25.66), with a significant difference in median values (P<0.0001). A significant difference in TMB values was also observed when the number of mutated MSI-associated loci was ≥2 versus <2. We next correlated the presence of mutations in a group of driver genes with the TMB values. Significantly different median TMB values were registered when a BRAF (Mann Whitney p value: 0.0023) or PIK3CA mutation (p value: 0.0082) was present, but not when KRAS alterations were detected. ConclusionsThe TMB values assessed with the OTML assay strongly correlated with MSI status in CRC. However, significant heterogeneity in TMB levels were detected among both MSI and MSS tumors, suggesting that TMB testing might provide additional information on sensitivity to ICI in CRC. The correlations with driver gene alterations might help in selecting tumors to be tested for TMB. Legal entity responsible for the studyThe authors. FundingHas not received any funding. DisclosureAll authors have declared no conflicts of interest.