Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy Research Articles

Immune checkpoint inhibition as a therapeutic strategy for HIV eradication: current insights and future directions.

HIV-1 infection contributes substantially to global morbidity and mortality, with no immediate promise of an effective prophylactic vaccine. Combination antiretroviral therapy (ART) suppresses HIV replication, but latent viral reservoirs allow the virus to persist and reignite active replication if ART is discontinued. Moreover, inflammation and immune disfunction persist despite ART-mediated suppression of HIV. Immune checkpoint molecules facilitate immune dysregulation and viral persistence. However, their therapeutic modulation may offer an avenue to enhance viral immune control for patients living with HIV-1 (PLWH). The success of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy in oncology suggests that targeting these same immune pathways might be an effective therapeutic approach for treating PLWH. Several ICIs have been evaluated for their ability to reinvigorate exhausted T cells, and possibly reverse HIV latency, in both preclinical and clinical HIV-1 studies. Although there are very encouraging findings showing enhanced CD8+ T-cell function with ICI therapy in HIV infection, it remains uncertain whether ICIs alone could demonstrably impact the HIV reservoir. Moreover, safety concerns and significant clinical adverse events present a hurdle to the development of ICI approaches. This review provides an update on the current knowledge regarding the development of ICIs for the remission of HIV-1 in PWH. We detail recent findings from simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV)-infected rhesus macaque models, clinical trials in PLWH, and the role of soluble immune checkpoint molecules in HIV pathogenesis.

Immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy associated with IgA nephropathy: a case report and literature review

Immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy associated with IgA nephropathy: a case report and literature review

Clinical evidence for the prognostic impact of metformin in cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors

BackgroundPreclinical studies suggest that metformin might enhance the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and potentially influence the prognoses of cancer patients undergoing ICIs treatment. This study endeavors to assess the prognostic significance of metformin in cancer patients undergoing ICIs therapy, aiming to furnish evidence-based insights for clinical practice. MethodsA thorough literature search was conducted across electronic databases to encompass all potential records published before November 20th, 2023. A meta-analysis was executed utilizing Stata 17.0 to derive pooled hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for both overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). ResultsA total of 22 studies encompassing 9,011 patients met the inclusion criteria. Meta-analyses revealed a significant correlation between metformin use and poorer OS (HR, 1.13; 95 %CI, 1.04–1.23; P = 0.004) rather than PFS (HR, 1.04; 95 %CI, 0.96–1.14; P = 0.345) among cancer patients undergoing ICIs treatment. Subgroup analysis delineated that the concurrent administration of metformin and ICIs significantly associated with adverse prognoses in the European population (OS: HR, 1.23; 95 %CI, 1.10–1.39; P = 0.001; PFS: HR, 1.14; 95 %CI, 1.02–1.28; P = 0.024). ConclusionBased on current clinical evidence, concomitant metformin use does not appear to improve the prognostic outcomes for cancer patients undergoing ICIs therapy and may potentially correlate with inferior prognoses. Further studies are imperative to comprehensively elucidate the impact of metformin within the realm of ICIs therapy.

Epithelial-mesenchymal transition induced by tumor cell-intrinsic PD-L1 signaling predicts a poor response to immune checkpoint inhibitors in PD-L1-high lung cancer.

We investigated the role of tumor cell-intrinsic PD-L1 signaling in the epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and the role of EMT as a predictive biomarker for immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy. PD-L1-overexpressing or PD-L1-knockdown NSCLC cells underwent RNA-seq and EMT phenotype assessment. Mouse lung cancer LLC cells were injected into nude mice. Two cohorts of patients with NSCLC undergoing ICI therapy were analyzed. RNA-seq showed that EMT pathways were enriched in PD-L1-high NSCLC cells. EMT was enhanced by PD-L1 in NSCLC cells, which was mediated by transforming growth factor-β (TGFβ). PD-L1 promoted the activation of p38-MAPK by binding to and inhibiting the protein phosphatase PPM1B, thereby increasing the TGFβ production. Tumor growth and metastasis increased in nude mice injected with PD-L1-overexpressing LLC cells. In the ICI cohort, EMT signature was higher in patients with progressive disease than in those with responses, and EMT was significantly associated with poor survival in PD-L1-high NSCLC. In PD-L1-high NSCLC, EMT was associated with increased M2-macrophage and regulatory T-cell infiltrations and decreased cytotoxic T-cell infiltration. Tumor cell-intrinsic PD-L1 function contributes to NSCLC progression by promoting EMT. EMT may predict an unfavorable outcome after ICI therapy in PD-L1-high NSCLC.

Efficacy of Pembrolizumab vs. Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab in Metastatic NSCLC in Relation to PD-L1 and TMB Status

The efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy concerning programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) status is well established in patients diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, there remains a paucity of evidence regarding the efficacy concerning tumor mutational burden (TMB) in both clinical trials and real-world data (RWD). In the current article, clinicopathological and molecular epidemiological data were meticulously collected, and treatment modalities were meticulously recorded. The final analysis included a study population of 194 patients. Median age was 67 years (range 37–86), with the majority being male (71.13%), and 85.71% of patients were either current or former smokers at diagnosis. Adenocarcinoma accounted for most diagnoses (71.65%), followed by squamous cell carcinoma (24.23%). In terms of PD-L1 status, 42.78% had an expression level below 1%, 28.35% had an expression between 1–49%, and 28.87% had an expression above 50%. The TMB ranged from 0 to 75, with a median of 10.31 (range 0–75) for PD-L1 expression below 1%, with a median of 9.73 (range 0.95–39.63) for PD-L1 expression between 1–49%, and a median of 9.72 (range 0.95–48) for PD-L1 expression above 50%. Corresponding to patients with low PDL-1 less than 1% and low TMB (0–5), the median overall survival (mOS) was 16 (p = 0.18), and 15 months (p = 0.22), patients with medium PDL-1 (1–49%) and medium TMB (5–10), the mOS was 15 (p = 0.18) and 16 months (p = 0.22), patients with high PDL-1 (>50) and high TMB (>10), the mOS was 24 (p = 0.18) and 21 (p = 0.22) months. This study represents the largest academic RWD dataset concerning PD-L1 and TMB status in patients with locally advanced and metastatic NSCLC.

Case report: Is severe toxicity the price to pay for high sensitivity to checkpoint inhibitors immunotherapy in desmoplastic melanoma?

BackgroundDesmoplastic melanoma (DM) is a rare subtype of melanoma characterized by high immunogenicity which makes it particularly suitable for immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) treatment.Case presentationWe report the case of a 53-year-old man with metastatic DM successfully treated with the combination of anti-CTLA-4 and anti-PD-1 antibodies, who developed serious immune-related adverse events (irAEs). The primary tumor was characterized by absent PD-L1 expression and no-brisk lymphocytes infiltration. NGS showed absence of BRAF mutation, a high tumor mutational burden, and an UV-induced DNA damage signature. Metastatic lesions regressed rapidly after few cycles of ICIs until complete response, however the patient developed serious irAEs including hypothyroidism, adrenal deficiency, and acute interstitial nephritis which led to the definitive suspension of treatment. Currently, the patient has normal renal functionality and no disease relapse after 26 months from starting immunotherapy, and after 9 months from its definitive suspension.ConclusionEfficacy and toxicity are two sides of the same coin of high sensitivity to ICIs in DM. For this reason, these patients should be closely monitored during ICIs therapy to promptly identify serious side effects and to correctly manage them.

Single-cell transcriptomic analyses reveal distinct immune cell contributions to epithelial barrier dysfunction in checkpoint inhibitor colitis.

Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy has revolutionized oncology, but treatments are limited by immune-related adverse events, including checkpoint inhibitor colitis (irColitis). Little is understood about the pathogenic mechanisms driving irColitis, which does not readily occur in model organisms, such as mice. To define molecular drivers of irColitis, we used single-cell multi-omics to profile approximately 300,000 cells from the colon mucosa and blood of 13 patients with cancer who developed irColitis (nine on anti-PD-1 or anti-CTLA-4 monotherapy and four on dual ICI therapy; most patients had skin or lung cancer), eight controls on ICI therapy and eight healthy controls. Patients with irColitis showed expanded mucosal Tregs, ITGAEHi CD8 tissue-resident memory T cells expressing CXCL13 and Th17 gene programs and recirculating ITGB2Hi CD8 T cells. Cytotoxic GNLYHi CD4 T cells, recirculating ITGB2Hi CD8 T cells and endothelial cells expressing hypoxia gene programs were further expanded in colitis associated with anti-PD-1/CTLA-4 therapy compared to anti-PD-1 therapy. Luminal epithelial cells in patients with irColitis expressed PCSK9, PD-L1 and interferon-induced signatures associated with apoptosis, increased cell turnover and malabsorption. Together, these data suggest roles for circulating T cells and epithelial-immune crosstalk critical to PD-1/CTLA-4-dependent tolerance and barrier function and identify potential therapeutic targets for irColitis.

Pre-first-line chemotherapy risk stratification for overall survival in advanced urothelial carcinoma in sequential therapy era.

To explore pre-treatment risk factors for overall survival (OS) in advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC) patients treated with first-line (1L) chemotherapy in sequential therapy (ST) era. Additionally, to evaluate the proportion of patients who were not able to undergo subsequent immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy according to the subgroups stratified by the risk factors. A multicenter retrospective study was conducted. Metastatic or locally advanced UC patients treated between 2017 and 2022 were included. The Kaplan-Meier method with the log-rank test and multivariate Cox regression models were used to address OS. Three hundred and fourteen patients treated with 1L chemotherapy were included in the study and 57 (18.2%) patients were not able to proceed to subsequent ICI therapy. Pre-chemotherapy risk factors for OS in 314 patients were ECOG-PS 1 or more, having no primary site resection, C-reactive protein (CRP) level of 3mg/dL or more, and non-cisplatin-based regimen. Patients having 3 or 4 risk factors had higher risk for not being able to receive ST (Mann-Whitney U test, P < 0.001). As risk factors for OS in 230 patients who were able to receive ST, having no primary site resection, a neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio of 3 or more, and the presence of liver metastasis were identified. We reported the risk factors for OS in advanced UC patients treated with 1L chemotherapy in ST era. Patients with high risk for OS may not be able to proceed to subsequent ICI therapy even in the ST era.

Real-world efficacy and safety of BRAF-targeted therapy for patients with advanced melanoma: A single-center retrospective study in Japan.

Most clinical trials investigating targeted therapies for patients harboring BRAF V600 mutations have included mostly White patients, and data for Asian patients are scarce. Although there are several retrospective studies in Japanese patients, they have investigated only the dabrafenib + trametinib regimen, and have had a short follow-up period. We conducted a single-center retrospective study to update previous studies and compare the outcomes with those in White patients. We analyzed 89 patients who received dabrafenib + trametinib or encorafenib + binimetinib, including 11 who received both treatment regimens. The overall response rate was 79.8%, with complete response in 25 patients (28.1%) and partial response in 45 patients (51.7%). The median progression-free survival was 13.7 months, and the median overall survival was 32.9 months. The 3-year progression-free and overall survival rates were 31.8% and 47.9%, respectively. Although the two regimens showed no significant differences in efficacy, their safety profiles differed, as reported in clinical trials. Therefore, the most frequent adverse event associated with the dabrafenib + trametinib regimen was pyrexia (61.3%) and that of encorafenib + binimetinib was blurred vision (32.0%). Switching directly to another targeted therapy after progressive disease showed no clinical response; however, rechallenge followed by immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy showed a certain response. As a prognostic factor, performance status was associated with progression-free survival, and performance status, serum lactate dehydrogenase level, and dose interruption were associated with overall survival in the multivariate analysis. Real-world data on targeted therapy for patients with melanoma in Japan suggest that both dabrafenib + trametinib and encorafenib + binimetinib show similar efficacy and safety in Asian and White patients.

Lactate dehydrogenase B as a metabolism-related marker for immunotherapy in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

BackgroundHead and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is one of the most common malignancies. Lactate dehydrogenase family genes (LDHs) play a critical role in tumor metabolism, but their functions in HNSCC have not been investigated thoroughly. Thus, we aimed to explore the value of LDHs in HNSCC. MethodsThe association between LDHs expression and mutations, methylation, copy number variations (CNVs), alternative splicing (AS) and competing endogenous RNA (ceRNA) was investigated in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). The expression level of LDHs in OSCC tissues and adjacent normal tissues was verified by qPCR. Algorithms, such as ssGSEA, ESTIMATE, xCell and TIDE were utilized to analyze the characteristics of immune infiltration. Pathway alternations were enriched by GO, GSEA and KEGG analysis. The Mantel test was employed to elucidate the correlation between metabolism and the tumor microenvironment (TME). Subsequently, MTT and colony formation assays were utilized to assess the impact of LDHB knockdown on cellular proliferation. Additionally, ATP and lactate assays were performed to examine metabolic alterations. Co-culture experiments further investigated the effect of LDHB knockdown on T cell differentiation. ResultsLDHs were completely analyzed in multiple databases, among which LDHB was differentially expressed in HNSCC and significantly associated with prognosis. Low LDHB expression had better clinicopathological characteristics. Downregulated LDHB expression was associated with enhanced immune cell infiltration and could influence tumor metabolism. Despite having worse cytotoxic T lymphocyte dysfunction, the LDHBlow group was predicted to respond more favorably to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) therapy. Moreover, the correlation between metabolism and TME was depicted. In vitro, LDHB knockdown resulted in inhibited cell proliferation, increased lactate levels and decreased ATP levels, while promoted the Th1 differentiation of T cells. ConclusionsOur study provided a comprehensive analysis of the LDHs and illustrated low LDHB expression could inhibit tumor cell proliferation and ATP production by influencing metabolism, with improved immune cell infiltration and better response to immunotherapy.

Immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy in patients with cancer and pre-existing systemic sclerosis

ObjectiveImmune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapies have dramatically improved outcomes in multiple cancers. ICI's mechanism of action involves immune system activation to augment anti-tumor immunity. Patients with pre-existing autoimmune diseases, such as systemic sclerosis (SSc), were excluded from initial ICI clinical trials due to concern that such immune system activation could precipitate an autoimmune disease flare or new, severe immune related adverse events (irAE). In the present study, we report our experience with ICIs in patients with pre-existing SSc. MethodsPatients with SSc who received ICI therapy for cancer were identified from the Johns Hopkins Scleroderma Center Research Registry. Through chart review and prespecified definitions, we identified whether patients experienced worsening SSc activity or new irAEs. SSc disease activity worsening was pre-defined as an increase in modified Rodnan skin score (mRSS), new scleroderma renal crisis, progression of interstitial lung disease (ILD) on CT scan, increased Raynaud's phenomenon frequency or severity, new pulmonary hypertension, or myositis flare. IrAEs also included active inflammatory arthritis and dermatitis. ResultsEight patients with SSc who received ICI therapy for cancer were included. Overall, SSc symptoms remained stable during and after ICI therapy. None of the patients with long-standing sine or limited cutaneous SSc (lcSSc) had progressive skin thickening after ICI therapy. One patient, who was early in his diffuse cutaneous SSc (dcSSc) disease course, experienced worsening skin thickening and renal crisis. Three patients (38 %) experienced a total of five irAEs (grade 2: diarrhea, mucositis and dermatitis; grade 3: pneumonitis, and grade 4: nephritis). The patient with grade 4 nephritis developed scleroderma renal crisis and immune checkpoint related nephritis simultaneously. There were no deaths due to irAEs. ConclusionIn this study, ICI therapy was well tolerated in patients with longstanding, sine or lcSSc. IrAE were common but generally manageable. Patients with early, active SSc may be at greater risk from ICI therapy, but more research is needed.

Emerging Innate Immune Cells in Cancer Immunotherapy: Promises and Challenges.

Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based therapy has made an unprecedented impact on survival benefit for a subset of cancer patients; however, only a subset of cancer patients is benefiting from ICI therapy if all cancer types are considered. With the advanced understanding of interactions of immune effector cell types and tumors, cell-based therapies are emerging as alternatives to patients who could not benefit from ICI therapy. Pioneering work of chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) therapy for hematological malignancies has brought encouragement to a broad range of development for cellular-based cancer immunotherapy, both innate immune cell-based therapies and T-cell-based therapies. Innate immune cells are important cell types due to their rapid response, versatile function, superior safety profiles being demonstrated in early clinical development, and being able to utilize multiple allogeneic cell sources. Efforts on engineering innate immune cells and exploring their therapeutic potential are rapidly emerging. Some of the therapies, such as CD19 CAR natural killer (CAR-NK) cell-based therapy, have demonstrated comparable early efficacy with CD19 CAR-T cells. These studies underscore the significance of developing innate immune cells for cancer therapy. In this review, we focus on the current development of emerging NK cells, γδ T cells, and macrophages. We also present our views on potential challenges and perspectives to overcome these challenges.

Abstract PO2-06-10: Prevalence of genomic alterations in Xerna tumor microenvironment subtypes in triple negative breast cancer patients

Abstract Introduction: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are an important therapeutic option for patients with triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). However, identification of patients most likely to respond is challenging. PD-L1 positivity by immunohistochemistry is the standard biomarker used for ICI therapy selection in TNBC. However, other biomarkers, such as analysis of the tumor microenvironment (TME) may be more accurate in predicting response. The XernaTM TME Panel uses RNA sequencing data and machine learning to analyze the TME, utilizing the angiogenic and immunogenic biology of the TME to classify tumors into four TME subtypes. In this study, the distribution of Xerna TME subtypes and associated genomic alterations in TNBC were investigated for their potential use in therapy selection. Methods: A total of 203 TNBC patient samples underwent tumor-normal whole-exome, whole-transcriptome sequencing testing with the OncoExTraTM assay. The whole-transcriptome expression data were analyzed using the Xerna TME Panel to assign each sample to one of four subtypes: Immune Active (IA), Immune Suppressed (IS), Immune Desert (ID) and Angiogenic (A). The IA and IS subtypes both have high immune scores that may be particularly sensitive to ICI therapy. Actionable alterations, defined as those with FDA-approved matched therapies in any cancer, with matched clinical trials, or with evidence in cancer guidelines or the literature for possible matched therapies, were also identified and associations across Xerna subtypes were explored. Results: Approximately half (100 of 203; 49.3%) of the patient samples had high (IA+IS) immune subtypes (Table 1). Targetable alterations associated with an FDA-approved therapy were present in 114 (56.2%) patients. No biomarkers were significantly associated (p &amp;lt; 0.05) with high (IA+IS) versus low (ID+A) immune scores. Biomarkers associated with ICI response, namely mismatch repair gene alterations (MSH2/3/6, MLH1/3, PMS1/2), high tumor mutational burden (TMB-high) and microsatellite instability were detected in only 6 (3.0%), 3 (1.5%) and 1 (0.5%) patient samples respectively, and all but 1, an MSH6 alteration, were in high immune subtype samples. Conclusions: The Xerna TME Panel classified 49.3% of TNBC patient tumors to IA or IS, suggesting they may respond to ICI therapy. Many (56.2%) patient tumors harbored alterations associated with FDA-approved therapies, providing the potential for novel combination therapies. These findings warrant further study and clinical validation in TNBC patients treated with ICI therapy. Table 1. Frequency of actionable biomarkers that were present in at least 10 (5%) TNBC patient samples. Citation Format: Gargi Basu, Janine Lobello, Snehal Thakkar, Jessica Aldrich, Matthew Halbert, Patrick Eimerman, Cynthia Flannery, Nishitha Therala, David Hall, Daniel Pointing, Lea Vohar, Roman Luštrik, Luka Ausec, Mark Uhlik, Seema Iyer, Laura Benjamin, Frederick Baehner. Prevalence of genomic alterations in Xerna tumor microenvironment subtypes in triple negative breast cancer patients [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO2-06-10.

Abstract PO2-18-11: Short-term Pre-OPerative Durvalumab (MEDI 4736) in early small triple negative breast cancer patients (POP-Durva)

Abstract Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are one of the major therapeutic advancements in cancer treatment. Anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (Anti-PD1)/PD-L1 ICIs have improved progression-free survival in patients with metastatic triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) and pathologic complete response (pCR) and event-free survival in patients with early TNBC. Nevertheless, some patients treated with anti-PD(L)1 ICIs experience recurrence or do not achieve sustained clinical benefit. In addition, very interesting data show the existence of a subgroup of patients with exceptional tumour responses to monotherapy with anti-PD(L)1 ICIs. These exceptional responses are observed in various tumour types, such as colorectal or breast cancer. Although in colorectal cancer, the determinants for this extreme sensitivity to immunotherapy treatment are identified (existence of MSI) in breast cancer, this is not the case. There is still a lack of knowledge about predictive biomarkers and mechanisms of action for ICIs. Trial Design: POP-Durva (NCT05215106) is a prospective, one-arm-only study aiming at determining the pCR rate after two administrations of Durvalumab monotherapy in patients with stage I TNBC. This window-of-opportunity study will recruit 195 consecutive cases of stage I TNBC (ER &amp;lt; 1%, PR &amp;lt; 1%, HER2 negative) and TILs≥5%, eligible for short-term treatment with durvalumab. Study treatment consists of two administrations of intravenous Durvalumab monotherapy, 10mg/kg, at two weeks intervals. After study treatment, patients will receive a standard treatment strategy (surgery or neoadjuvant systemic treatment) as per physician choice. The primary endpoint is the pCR rate after treatment with Durvalumab, defined as the absence of invasive disease in the breast and negative axillary nodes (ypT0/yTis ypN0). Assessment of the primary endpoint will be performed at the surgery or at the biopsy at the end of treatment) for patients undergoing neoadjuvant treatment. For patients in whom neo-adjuvant therapy is the first standard treatment strategy (i.e. after study treatment) a breast ultrasound-guided biopsy is mandatory at the end of the treatment visit. If the biopsy-proven residual disease is demonstrated, patients can receive standard neoadjuvant therapy at the discretion of the treating investigator. Patients with biopsy-proven residual disease will be considered as having no pCR. Those with a complete response may proceed directly to surgery. The expected pCR rate with Durvalumab monotherapy is 20%. The sample size of 195 patients will allow us to estimate this expected pCR rate with a 95% confidence interval of a precision of 6.2%. Secondary objectives are objective response rate and safety. Exploratory objectives are to: a. describe immune cell dynamics associated with exceptional responses to ICI (using spectral cytometry analysis), b. describe somatic genetic contributions to the determination of immune responsiveness (using whole exome sequencing (WES) and in a subset of patient's single-cell RNA-seq), c. characterize tumour cells – immune cells' interaction/spatial distribution(using imaging mass cytometry), d. explore the association between gut microbiome composition/signatures predictive of response to ICI (using 16s rRNA sequencing) and e. identify predictive tissue/blood-based biomarkers of response and to anti-PD(L)1 ICIs therapy. A total of two dedicated FFPE samples and two fresh biopsies will be collected at the time of inclusion and at the end of treatment biopsy or on the surgical specimen. In addition, we will collect stool samples pre and at the completion of all Durvalumab treatments and blood samples at the time of inclusion, during treatment (before each Durvalumab administration) and at the end of treatment for serum and plasma extraction and whole blood to serve as a control for WES. Citation Format: Joana Mourato Ribeiro, Isabelle Pic, Quentin Blampey, Elie Rassy, Nusaibah Ibrahimi, Laura Salabert, Olivier Trédan, Monica Arnedos, Semih Dogan, Kamar Serhal Serhal, Clementine Mahaut, Alessandro Viansone, Salim Laghouati, Barbara Pistilli, Charles-Antoine Dutertre, Magali Lacroix-Triki, Jean-Yves Scoazec, Lisa Derosa, Laurence Zitvogel, Corinne Balleyguier, Nadege Bercovici, Paul-Henry Cournede, Stefan Michiels, Fabrice André. Short-term Pre-OPerative Durvalumab (MEDI 4736) in early small triple negative breast cancer patients (POP-Durva) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO2-18-11.

Abstract PO5-19-08: Neoadjuvant HER2-targeted Therapy +/- Immunotherapy with Pembrolizumab (neoHIP): An Open Label Randomized Phase II Trial

Abstract Background: Immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) is synergistic with HER2-directed therapy in pre-clinical models. Clinically, pembrolizumab (K)-mediated ICI plus HER2-directed therapy with trastuzumab (H) was safe and demonstrated modest activity in H-resistant HER2-positive (HER2+) metastatic breast cancer. Because ICI may confer more robust activity when administered earlier in the course of disease, H and K administered in the curative-intent, treatment-naive setting may allow for de-escalation of cytotoxics; confer life-long, tumor-specific immunity; and ultimately, improve cure rates. Moreover, the synergy of H and K with paclitaxel (T) may overcome the need for dual HER2-blockade with H plus pertuzumab (P). In this randomized, multicenter, phase II, open-label trial the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant THP vs THP-K vs TH-K are explored. Methods: Patients (pts) ≥18y with previously untreated, stage II-III, HER2+ breast cancer are being randomized and stratified by clinical nodal status (positive vs. negative) and hormone receptor status (positive vs. negative). In arm A, pts receive T at 80mg/m2 weekly for 12 weeks, H at 8mg/Kg (loading dose) and then 6mg/Kg every 3 weeks x 3 doses, P at 840 mg (loading dose) and then 420mg/Kg every 3 weeks x 3 doses (THP). In arm B, pts receive THP plus K at 200mg every 3 weeks x 4 doses (THP-K). In arm C, pts receive TH-K. After enrollment of 22 pts to arm C, a prespecified interim efficacy analysis was conducted, and enrollment to this arm was subsequently terminated. Enrollment to the other arms continues with 32/58 pts enrolled to arm A and 33/58 pts enrolled to arm B as of 2/14/2023. Definitive surgery is 3-6 weeks after the last dose. After surgery, pts are treated per the treating physician’s discretion per local clinical standard. The primary end point is pathologic complete response (pCR) rate in the breast and axilla (ypT0/Tis ypN0). Secondary end points include pCR rate by ypT0ypN0 and ypT0/Tis, residual cancer burden index, event free survival, breast conserving surgery rate, safety and overall survival. Exploratory correlative studies will characterize potential immune biomarkers predictive of efficacy and/or toxicity. Funding sources: BCRF, Merck NCT03747120 Citation Format: Heather McArthur, Jorge Henrique Santos Leal, Isaac Chan, Nisha Unni, Stephen Shiao, Joshua Gruber, Samira Syed, Namrata Peswani, Navid Sadeghi, Glenda Delgado, Dawn Klemow, Reva Basho, Meredith Carter, Mai Badran, Nasir Qureshi, Jessica Curtin, Joshua Weese, Stephanie Rice, Michelle Phillips, David Chan, Hugo Hool, Dorothy Park, Mary El-Masry, Philomena McAndrew, Swati Sikaria, Laura Spring, Aditya Bardia, Mourad Tighiouart, Farnaz Dadmanesh, Armando Giuliano, Katherine Sanchez, David Page. Neoadjuvant HER2-targeted Therapy +/- Immunotherapy with Pembrolizumab (neoHIP): An Open Label Randomized Phase II Trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO5-19-08.

Abstract PS14-07: Exploring Circulating Leukocyte RNA Expression: Implications for Treatment Outcomes and Immune-Related Adverse Events in Patients with Triple Negative Breast Cancer Enrolled in the GeparNuevo Trial

Abstract Abstract Exploring Circulating Leukocyte RNA Expression: Implications for Treatment Outcomes and Immune-Related Adverse Events in Patients with Triple Negative Breast Cancer Enrolled in the GeparNuevo Trial Background: Significant research has been conducted on the influence of immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy on tumor microenvironment, particularly with regard to tumor-infiltrating immune cells. Nevertheless, our understanding of the circulating immune repertoire and its association with treatment outcomes remains limited. Consequently, our subproject of the GeparNuevo trial aimed to explore the RNA phenotype of circulating leukocytes and its impact on overall survival (OS), and adverse events of patients enrolled in the GeparNuevo trial (Loibl S et al. Annals Oncol 2022). Methods: The GeparNuevo phase II trial focused on the effects of neoadjuvant nab-paclitaxel followed by epirubicin/cyclophosphamide (nabP-EC) chemotherapy combined with the anti-PD-L1 immune checkpoint inhibitor durvalumab versus placebo in patients with non-metastatic triple-negative breast cancer. RNA-stabilizing PAXgene tubes were used to collect blood samples prior to treatment initiation. RNA was extracted from circulating leukocytes of 117 patients and analyzed using a custom NanoString nCounter CodeSet, including 290 immune-related target genes. The associations between 16 immune cell scores, 26 immune signaling scores, 31 individual gene expression patterns, OS, and immune-related adverse events (irAEs) were analyzed. Results: Univariate Cox regression analysis using continuous scores revealed a significant correlation between PIP3 activates AKT signaling, T cells, CDK2, and TIMP1 expression with OS in the placebo arm. Higher expression of PIP3 activates AKT signaling, T cells, and CDK2, as well as lower expression of TIMP1, were associated with prolonged survival. Notably, T cell scores and CDK2 expression exhibited a significant interaction with the treatment arm (p=0.0489 and 0.0210, respectively). Multivariate Cox regression analysis demonstrated a significant association of DPP4, ICOS and MYC expression with OS. Additionally, CDK2, CDKN2A, F5 and HLA-DRA expression were linked to the presence of irAEs. In the durvalumab arm, TNFR2 non canonical NFkB pathway signaling, CDK2 and CDKN2A expression showed an inverse association with the occurrence of irAEs. Conclusions: Our study provides preliminary evidence that RNA derived from circulating leukocytes may serve as a potential biomarker for predicting treatment outcomes and identifying patients prone to develop side effects during standard-of-care chemotherapy or immune checkpoint therapy. These findings highlight the potential utility of peripheral immune cell RNA profiling in improving treatment strategies and patient management. Further research and validation are necessary to fully comprehend the clinical significance and broader implications of these findings. Citation Format: Hanna Hübner, Matthias Ruebner, Andreas Schneeweiss, Carsten Denkert, Hans-Peter Sinn, Michael Braun, Thomas Karn, Bruno V. Sinn, Dirk-Michael Zahm, Jörg Thomalla, Jens Huober, Claus Hanusch, Michael Untch, Christine Solbach, Theresa Link, Natalie Filmann, Julia Rey, Johannes Holtschmidt, Sibylle Loibl, Peter A. Fasching. Exploring Circulating Leukocyte RNA Expression: Implications for Treatment Outcomes and Immune-Related Adverse Events in Patients with Triple Negative Breast Cancer Enrolled in the GeparNuevo Trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PS14-07.

Abstract PO2-20-10: Exceptional long-term disease control on pembrolizumab monotherapy in a patient with TMB-high PMS2-mutated MMR-deficient triple negative breast cancer brain metastasis

Abstract Introduction The brain is among the most common sites of breast cancer (BC) spread. Prognosis of BC brain metastasis (BCBM) differs by receptor subtype, with poorest median overall survival (OS) for triple-negative (TN) BCBM at under 5 months. Though treatment guidelines have evolved in recent years, most strategies have focused on local therapies including surgery and stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT), rather than on systemic agents. The 2020 FDA approval of pembrolizumab (pembro) for patients (pts) with metastatic high-tumor mutational burden (TMB-h, ≥ 10 mutations/megabase) solid tumors, agnostic of primary site, combined with clinical trials in melanoma reporting efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) against BM, suggest a potential use of ICI for pts with TMB-h BCBM. Results of the TAPUR study supported modest therapeutic benefit of pembro for 28 pts with metastatic BC selected for TMB-h, with median OS of 30.6 weeks, but did not include pts with active BCBM. TMB-h is uncommon in BC, and further genomic signatures remain to be elucidated to identify pts with BCBM responsive to ICI. We present a remarkable case of a pt with Lynch Syndrome (LS) due to a germline PMS2 mutation, who developed TMB-h, mismatch repair (MMR)-deficient TN BCBM, and has maintained stable disease for over 6 years on pembro monotherapy. Case description A 62-y.o. woman underwent screening mammography that identified a right breast mass. Pt has a family history of a mother with uterine and pancreatic cancer, and father with bladder cancer. Biopsy confirmed invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC), grade 1 (G1), ER/PR-positive, HER2 score 0. She underwent partial mastectomy, axillary dissection, radiation, and received adjuvant anastrozole. Three years later, while still on anastrozole, she presented with a 6 cm right breast mass. Mastectomy disclosed G3, ER/PR-negative, HER2-positive (3+, Her2:CEP17 ratio 5.6) IDC. She received adjuvant chemotherapy (AC-T) and 1 year of trastuzumab. Seven years later, pt presented with headaches and word finding difficulties. MRI identified a 3.6 cm frontal mass, which biopsy revealed as TN BCBM. Systemic imaging ruled out distant metastases. Pt proceeded with SRT and exemestane (despite receptor staining ER- in case of a possible false negative result). Despite radiotherapy, pt had BCBM progression within the same year with the largest mass diameter grown to 4.8 cm. Resection (followed by SRT) identified the dominant histology as G3 TNBC. Following transition of care to our institution, germline testing revealed a pathogenic mutation in PMS2 (c943C &amp;gt;T). Tumor sequencing of the resected brain metastasis showed TMB of 48 and MMR deficiency. Therefore, systemic therapy with pembro monotherapy was initiated and maintained with good tolerability. Two years later, concern for progression from rising tumor markers led to addition of concurrent carboplatin/gemcitabine for 5 cycles. Imaging and tumor markers stabilized, and pt returned to pembro monotherapy. Today, 3 years later, and over 6.5 years after initial TN BCBM diagnosis, pt continues to have stable disease on pembro with an excellent performance status (ECOG 0) and no evidence of intracranial or extracranial progression. Discussion We document an exceptional case of prolonged benefit to pembro in a pt with TMB-h PMS2-mutated MMR-deficient TN BCBM. This case highlights two major pragmatic points to clinical practice; (i) the significance of germline testing in all pts with metastatic BC, and (ii) the impact of molecular testing of tumor tissue to identify rare alterations which may have dramatic effects on pt outcomes. Altogether, this case is a remarkable addition to growing evidence that TMB could be a biomarker for predicting response to ICI therapy and provides an example of ICI efficacy in the setting of BCBM. Further research on additional genomic, clinical, and pathologic features associated with ICI responsiveness is warranted for greater precision in BCBM management. Citation Format: Jaeyoon Cha, Albert Grinshpun, Lauren Buckley, Brian Alexander, Sara Tolaney, Nancy Lin. Exceptional long-term disease control on pembrolizumab monotherapy in a patient with TMB-high PMS2-mutated MMR-deficient triple negative breast cancer brain metastasis [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO2-20-10.

Identification of ATM Mutation as a Potential Prognostic Biomarker for Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Therapy

Background: Ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM), an apical DNA damage response gene, is a commonly mutated gene in tumors, and its mutation could strengthen tumor immunogenicity and alter the expression of PD-L1, which potentially contributes to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) therapy. Methods: The characteristics of ATM mutation and its relationship with the ICIs-treated clinical prognosis have been analyzed comprehensively in this paper. The overall frequency of ATM mutations has been found to be 4% (554/10953) in the cancer genome atlas (TCGA) cohort. Results: Both the TMB and MSI levels in patients with ATM mutations were significantly higher than those in patients without mutations (P &lt; 0.0001). The median TMB was positively correlated with the frequency of ATM mutations (r = 0.54, P = 0.003). In the TCGA cohort, patients with ATM mutations had better clinical benefits in terms of overall survival (OS, hazard ratio (HR) = 0.736, 95% CI = 0.623 - 0.869), progression-free survival (PFS, HR = 0.761, 95% CI = 0.652 - 0.889), and disease-free survival (DFS, HR = 0.686, 95% CI = 0.512 - 0.919)] than patients without ATM mutations. Subsequently, the verification results showed ATM mutations to be significantly correlated with longer OS in ICIs-treated patients (HR = 0.710, 95% CI = 0.544 - 0.928). Further exploration indicated ATM mutation to be significantly associated with regulated anti-tumor immunity (P &lt; 0.05). Conclusion: Our findings highlight the value of ATM mutation as a promising biomarker to predict ICIs therapy in multiple tumors.

Management of Hepatitis B Virus and Hepatitis C Virus Infections in Patients with Cancer Receiving Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors.

Patients with cancer with hepatitis B virus (HBV) or hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection are excluded from many cancer clinical trials of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Therefore, data are limited regarding the management of HBV and HCV infections in patients with cancer treated with ICIs. To address this gap, we reviewed the literature on management of HBV and HCV infections in patients with cancer receiving ICIs. We searched MEDLINE and PubMed for all original research articles, case reports, and systematic reviews published in English between Jul 2013 and Jul 2023 on patients with cancer with HBV or HCV infection receiving ICIs. We found 28 studies (three prospective clinical trials, seven retrospective cohort studies, nine retrospective case series, and nine case reports) that evaluated the safety of ICI therapy in patients with HBV infection and cancer. The overall rate of HBV reactivation was 1.4% (38/2799), and no HBV-related deaths were reported. The frequency of HBV reactivation in patients with chronic and past HBV infections was 2% (35/1667) and 0.3% (3/1132), respectively. The risk of HBV reactivation was significantly higher among patients with chronic HBV infection not receiving antiviral prophylaxis than among those receiving antivirals (17% vs 1%, p < 0.05). Based on high-quality evidence, for patients with chronic HBV infection, antiviral prophylaxis is recommended before ICI therapy initiation. For patients with past HBV infection, monitoring and on-demand antiviral treatment are sufficient. We found 11 studies (five clinical trials, five retrospective studies, and one prospective observational study) that evaluated the safety of ICI therapy in patients with HCV infection and cancer. The overall rate of HCV reactivation was 0.5% (2/387), and no HCV-related deaths were reported. HCV reactivation occurs primarily in patients receiving immunosuppressants for ICI-related toxic effects. ICIs are safe for HCV-infected patients with solid tumors. Chronic HBV or HCV infection should not be considered a contraindication for ICI therapy. Specific risk assessment, monitoring, and management strategies are necessary to reduce the risk of ICI-related liver injury in patients with cancer and chronic HBV or HCV infection.

Unanticipated pathological clearance in two cases of clinical T4b dMMR/MSI-h advanced colorectal cancer: the potential of immune checkpoint inhibitors despite positive positron-emission tomography results.

The standard treatment for colorectal cancer consists of surgery and chemotherapy, which can be combined to improve outcomes. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are a significant advancement in the standard treatment of metastatic, unresectable colorectal cancer with deficient mismatch repair (dMMR). However, limited data are available about the use of ICI in the neoadjuvant and conversion settings. Here, we present two cases treated with ICI. Case 1: A 75-year-old male with a large, borderline resectable rectal cancer diagnosed as cT4bN1bM0 who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy, followed by combination ICI consisting of ipilimumab and nivolumab. After four courses of ICI, the tumor significantly shrank, but positron emission tomography still showed a positive result and R0 resection was performed. Pathological analysis revealed no residual cancer cells. The patient has been monitored without adjuvant chemotherapy, and no recurrences have occurred after one year. Case 2: A 60-year-old male with locally advanced sigmoid colon cancer who received neoadjuvant treatment with pembrolizumab. The tumor partially shrank after three courses, and continued pembrolizumab monotherapy resulted in further tumor shrinkage which still showed positive positron emission tomography. Curative sigmoidectomy with partial resection of the ileum and bladder was performed, and the pathological outcome was pCR. There was no viable tumor in the specimen. The patient has been monitored without adjuvant chemotherapy for six months, and no recurrence has been observed. The present study reports two cases, including a large, borderline resectable rectal cancer after failure of chemotherapy followed by combination treatment with nivolumab and ipilimumab and one case of sigmoid colon cancer after pembrolizumab treatment, which resulted in pathological complete response. However, it remains unknown whether ICI therapy can replace surgery or diminish the optimal extent of resection, or whether adjuvant chemotherapy is needed after surgery in the case of achieving pCR after ICI therapy. Overall, this case report suggests that ICI before colorectal surgery can be effective and potentially a 'watch-and-wait" strategy could be used for cases in which ICI is effective.